Elective Neurosurgical Procedures Research Articles

Efficiency of a Neurosurgical Operating Room According to Nursing Characteristics in a University Hospital: From Operating Times to a Cost-Benefit Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of operating room nurse (ORN) characteristics on the duration of elective neurosurgical procedures in adults. In addition, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis of various strategies for organizing the workflow of ORNs. METHODS: We collected and analyzed operating times for adult elective neurosurgical procedures, categorizing them by surgeon, procedure complexity (dichotomized as technologically complex and simple), and ORN characteristics (dichotomized as ORN dedicated to neurosurgery [dORN] and ORN not dedicated to neurosurgery [ndORN]). The monetary valuation of operating times is based on the unitary cost per minute of the operating room, including opportunity costs of ORN, as well as their training costs and salaries. Cost-benefit analysis adopted the hospital perspective. RESULTS: Analysis of operating times reveals an approximately 20-minute difference for complex procedures when performed with ndORN. However, there is no significant difference in operating times for simple procedures, whether they are conducted by dORN or ndORN. The additional annual cost incurred by complex procedures performed with ndORN is estimated at CHF 68 144.4 for the Geneva University Hospitals. CONCLUSION: Complex neurosurgical procedures exhibit shorter durations when performed by dORNs. We explore several hypotheses to explain this difference. By adapting available human resources and optimizing workflow organization, hospitals can potentially achieve a net benefit.

Medical History and Preoperative Coagulation Profile as Predictors of Outcomes in Elective Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

In patients with unremarkable medical history, comprehensive preoperative hemostasis screening in elective neurosurgery remains debated. Comprehensive medical history has shown to be noninferior to coagulation profile to evaluate surgical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the predictiveness of preoperative coagulation screening and medical history for surgical outcomes. Databases were searched until April 2023 for observational cohort studies that reported preoperative hemostasis screening and clinical history prior to elective neurosurgical procedures. Outcomes of interest included postoperative transfusion, mortality, and complications. Pooled relative risk ratios (RRs) were analyzed using random-effects models. Out of 604 studies, 3 cohort studies met our inclusion criteria, adding a patient population of 83,076. Prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT; RR=1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.14, 1.77, P=0.002), elevated international normalized ratio (INR; RR=2.01, 95% CI=1.14, 3.55, P=0.02), low platelet count (RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.34, 1.86, P<0.00001), and positive bleeding history (RR=2.14, 95% CI=1.16, 3.93, P=0.01) were associated with postoperative transfusion risk. High PTT (RR=2.42, 95%CI=1.24, 4.73, P=0.010), High INR (RR=8.15, 95% CI=5.97, 11.13; P<0.00001), low platelet count (RR=4.89, 95% CI=3.73, 6.41, P<0.00001), and bleeding history (RR=7.59, 95% CI=5.84, 9.86, P<0.00001) were predictive of mortality. Prolonged PTT (RR=1.53, 95% CI=1.25, 1.86, P=<0.0001), a high INR (RR=3.41, 95% CI=2.63, 4.42, P=< 0.00001), low platelets (RR=1.63, 95% CI=1.40, 1.90, P=<0.00001), and medical history (RR=2.15, 95% CI=1.71, 2.71, P=<0.00001) were predictive of complications. Medical history was a noninferior predictor to coagulation profile for postoperative transfusion, mortality, and complications. However, our findings are mostly representative of elective spinal procedures. Cost-effective alternatives should be explored to promote affordable patient care in patients with unremarkable history.

COVID-19 and Surgical Practice in Slovenia: Managing the Crisis in Neurosurgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Worldwide, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a significant threat to global health. Worldwide, COVID-19 has affected the health service also in Slovenia. During this time, neurosurgery is facing difficulties in its service, both in emergency and elective surgeries. In the article, we describe the anti-COVID-19 measures taken at our neurosurgical department in a medical centre in Ljubljana, Slovenia, and analysed and compared the number of emergency and elective neurosurgical procedures during the time of the pandemic.

Perioperative continuation or ultra-early resumption of antithrombotics in elective neurosurgical cranial procedures.

Discontinuation of antithrombotics (AT) prior to elective cranial procedures is common practice, despite the higher risk of thromboembolic complications in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risks and benefits of a new perioperative management protocol of continuation or ultra-early AT resumption in elective cranial procedures. This study was an analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of patients undergoing elective cranial surgery with (AT group) and without (control group) AT. For extraaxial or shunt surgeries, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was continued perioperatively. For intraaxial pathologies, ASA was discontinued 2 days before surgery and resumed on postoperative day 3. All other AT were discontinued according to their pharmacokinetics, and resumed on postoperative day 3 after unremarkable postoperative imaging. Additionally, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients with AT who underwent surgery before implementation of this new AT management protocol (historical AT group). Primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications within 3 months after surgery. Outcomes of 312 patients were analyzed (83 [27%] in the AT group, 106 [34%] in the control group, and 123 [39%] in the historical AT group). For all 3 patient groups, the most common type of surgery was craniotomy for intraaxial tumors (14 [17%] in the AT group, 28 [26%] in the control group, and 60 [49%] in the historical AT group). The most commonly used AT were ASA (38 [46%] in the AT group and 78 [63%] in the historical AT group), followed by non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (32 [39%] in the AT group and 18 [15%] in the historical AT group). The total perioperative discontinuation time in the AT group was significantly shorter than in the historical AT group (median of 4 vs 16 days; p < 0.001). The rate of hemorrhagic complications was 4% (95% CI 1-10) (n = 3/83) in the AT group, 6% (95% CI 2-12) (n = 6/106) in the control group, and 7% (95% CI 3-13) (n = 9/123) in the historical AT group (p = 0.5). The rate of thromboembolic complications was 5% (95% CI 1-12) (n = 4/82) in the AT group, 8% (95% CI 3-15) (n = 8/104) in the control group, and 7% (95% CI 3-13) (n = 8/120) in the historical AT group (p = 0.7). The presented perioperative management protocol of continuation or ultra-early resumption of AT in elective cranial procedures does not seem to increase the hemorrhagic risk. Moreover, it appears to potentially protect patients from thromboembolic complications.

Utility of Routine Preoperative Urinalysis in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections

Preoperative assessment is important for neurosurgical risk stratification, but the level of evidence for individual screening tests is low. In preoperative urinalysis (UA), testing may significantly increase costs and lead to inappropriate antibiotic treatment. We prospectively evaluated whether eliminating preoperative UA was noninferior to routine preoperative UA as measured by 30-day readmission for surgical site infection in adult elective neurosurgical procedures. A single-institution prospective, pragmatic study of patients receiving elective neurosurgical procedures from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. Patients were allocated based on same-day versus preoperative admission status. Rates of preoperative UA and subsequent wound infection were measured along with detailed demographic, surgical, and laboratory data. The study included 879 patients. The most common types of surgery were cranial (54.7%), spine (17.4%), and stereotactic/functional (19.5%). No preoperative UA was performed in 315 patients, while 564 underwent UA. Of tested patients, 103 (18.3%) met criteria for suspected urinary tract infection, and 69 (12.2%) received subsequent antibiotic treatment. There were 14 patients readmitted within 30 days (7 without UA [2.2%] vs. 7 with UA [1.2%]) for subsequent wound infection with a risk difference of 0.98% (95% confidence interval-0.89% to 2.85%). The upper limit of the confidence interval exceeded the preselected noninferiority margin of 1%. In this prospective study of preoperative UA for elective neurosurgical procedures using a pragmatic, real-world design, risk of readmission due to surgical site infection was very low across the study cohort, suggesting a limited role of preoperative UA for elective neurosurgical procedures.

Effectiveness of Scalp Nerves Block in Reducing the Immediate Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy in Elective Neurosurgical Procedures

Objective: To determine the usefulness of regional scalp block in controlling pain after craniotomy. Methodology: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at the Pakistan Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad from November 2021 to April 2022. Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years, scheduled for elective craniotomy for neurosurgical procedures with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, of either gender, were included. Patients underwent craniotomy for their respective lesions. Patients were randomized into two groups: one receiving a regional scalp nerve block of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine after general anesthesia, and the other undergoing general anesthesia as a placebo. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at baseline (preoperatively), at 1 hour postoperatively, and at 6 hours postoperatively. Results: The mean age of patients in the treatment group was 43.14 years, while in the control group, it was 42.55 years. The treatment group had 26 males (54.2%) and 22 females (45.8%), while the control group had 25 males (52.1%) and 23 females (47.9%). There was no significant difference in the VAS score preoperatively (p &gt; 0.05). Patients undergoing surgeries lasting less than 3 hours showed that the treatment group had a significantly lower mean VAS score of 3.08 at 1 hour compared to the control group's score of 5.11 (p = 0.027), while at the 6-hour post-surgery it was insignificant (p = 0.844). For surgeries lasting more than 3 hours, the treatment group had a significantly lower mean VAS score at 1 hour and at 6 hours post-surgery compared to the control group (p &lt; 0.05). There were no overall complications associated with the subcutaneous injection of epinephrine and bupivacaine in blocking the scalp nerves. Conclusion: The administration of scalp nerve blocks using bupivacaine and epinephrine prior to surgical incisions has demonstrated notable advantages in terms of postoperative pain management. Such nerve blocks can offer superior postoperative analgesia compared to the control group.

Allocating operating room capacity to non-elective neurosurgical patients improves access and safety for elective patients at Aarhus University Hospital

Introduction This study addresses surgical scheduling within the Department of Neurosurgery at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH). The department provides neurosurgical care to a population of 1.3 million in central Denmark, and has treatment obligations for specific neurosurgical diseases for the entire country, which has a population of 5.8 million. Efficient utilisation of the department’s four operating suites is crucial to ensure that patients have timely access to both non-elective and elective neurosurgical procedures. Historically, the elective operating room (OR) schedule was made without consideration of the possible arrival of non-elective patients; consequently, elective surgeries were often cancelled to accommodate those with more urgent indications. The challenge was thus to introduce a structured way of planning for these non-elective surgical procedures that would minimise the need for cancelling elective surgeries without decreasing overall productivity. Methods Using a mathematical model developed in a previous study at Leiden University Medical Center, the effect of allocating OR time during regular working hours for non-elective neurosurgical procedures at AUH was analysed, so that a weighted trade-off could be made between cancellations of elective patients due to an overflow of non-elective patients and unused OR time due to excessive reservation of time for non-elective patients. This allocation was tested in a six-week pilot study during weeks 24 & 25 and weeks 34–37 of 2020 before being implemented in 2021. Results In the 35 weeks following the implementation, the new allocation strategy resulted in a significant 77% decrease in the cancellation of elective neurosurgical procedures when compared with the same time period in 2019, with a significant 16% increase in surgical productivity. Conclusions This study shows that with mathematical modelling complex problems in the distribution of neurosurgical OR capacity can be solved, improving both patient safety and the working environment of neurosurgeons and OR staff.

Serum sodium and water imbalance after sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar surgeries: A prospective and observational study

Background: Sodium and water imbalance is common after sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar surgeries. A wide variation in the diagnostic criteria of diabetes insipidus (DI) has been noted in literature. A highly variable incidence of DI and hyponatraemia has been reported. There is paucity of Indian studies. Aims and Objectives: The study was designed to evaluate serum sodium level and water imbalance after sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar surgeries. This was evaluated in terms of occurrence of hyponatraemia and central DI on day 1 and day 7 in the post-operative period. Materials and Methods: Patients of either sex, aged from 18 to 65 years, ASA physical status I-II, GCS score ≥13, with baseline normal electrolyte level, posted for elective neurosurgical procedures for sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar tumours, were included for this study after satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A convenient sampling of 50 patients was considered for this study. The primary outcome measures were to determine the incidence of hyponatraemia and central DI. Other adverse event and any requirement of desmopressin in the post-operative period were also noted. Results: In the present study, the majority (74%) of patients were 31–50 years. Female preponderance was noted with male: female ratio as 1:1.4. Out of 50 cases 41 (82%) had transcranial surgery and 9 (18%) had transphenoidal surgery. The incidence of sodium and water disturbances (SWD) was observed in 22% (11/50) patients. Out of these 11 patients, nine developed DI and two had hyponatremia on day 1 in the post-operative period. Both the abnormalities were found to recover on day 7. Only 1 patient (2%) required desmopressin. Conclusion: The incidence of SWD after sellar, suprasellar, and parasellar surgeries was found to be common (22%). The hyponatraemia and DI responded to the therapy and were transient in nature.

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl-Based Anesthetic Protocols Under Patient State Index Guidance in Patients Undergoing Elective Neurosurgical Procedures with Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Objectives The study was designed to elucidate the effects of dexmedetomidine as an anesthetic adjunct to propofol in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on anesthetic dose reduction, the quality of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) recordings, analgesic requirements, and recovery parameters in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures with neurophysiological monitoring. Methods A total of 54 patients for elective neurosurgical procedures with IONM were randomized to group D (dexmedetomidine) and group F (fentanyl). A loading dose of the study drug of 1µg/kg followed by 0.5 µg/kg/h infusion was used in two groups. Propofol-based TIVA with a Schneider target-controlled infusion model was used for induction and maintenance with effect site concentration of 4-5 and 2.5-4 µg/mL, respectively, titrated to a Patient State Index (PSI) of 25-40. Baseline IONM recordings were obtained after induction. The mean propofol consumption, number of patient movements, quality of IONM recordings, number of fentanyl boluses, hemodynamic characteristics, and recovery parameters were recorded. Results The mean propofol consumption was significantly lower in group D when compared to group F (101.4 ± 13.5 µg/kg/min vs 148.0 ± 29.8 µg/kg/min). Baseline IONM recordings were acquired in all patients without any difficulty. The two groups were comparable with respect to the number of additional boluses of fentanyl, patient movements, and recovery characteristics. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol in TIVA reduces the requirement of the latter, without affecting the IONM recordings. The addition of dexmedetomidine also ensures stable hemodynamics and decreases the requirement of opioids with similar recovery characteristics.

A Randomized Trial to Compare Ultrasound-Guided Dorsalis Pedis Versus Posterior Tibial Artery Cannulation in Neurosurgical Patients.

Introduction Dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery is selected as an alternative to radial artery cannulation when there is no access or unsuccessful cannulation of a radial artery. This study aimed to compare the two major arteries of the foot (dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial) in terms of their ultrasound (USG)-guided cannulation characteristics in patients posted for elective neurosurgical procedures. Methods All consenting patients, 18-65 years of age, scheduled for elective neurosurgical procedures under general anesthesia requiringarterial cannulations were enrolled. The first-pass success rate, assessment time, cannulation time, total procedural time, and the number of cannulation attempts for both procedures were estimated. Results A total of 90 patients were included in the study. The assessment time, cannulation time, and total time for arterial cannulation were significantly greater in the dorsalis pedis artery group than in the posterior tibial artery group (p < 0.001). Successful arterial cannulation in the first attempt was 73.3% in the dorsalis pedis, whereas it was 80% in the posterior tibial group but comparable (p = 0.455). The successful cannulation outcome was slightly more in the posterior tibial artery group but comparable (p = 1.00). Conclusion First-pass successful cannulation rates in the posterior tibial and the dorsalis pedis artery are comparable. However, the assessment time, cannulation time, and total procedural time are higher and statistically significant for dorsalis pedis artery cannulation compared to the posterior tibial artery group.

Perioperative Continuation or Ultra-Early Resumption of Antithrombotics in Elective Neurosurgical Cranial Procedures

Perioperative Continuation or Ultra-Early Resumption of Antithrombotics in Elective Neurosurgical Cranial Procedures

Clinical Utility of Routine Postprocedural Computed Tomography of the Head Following Elective Neuroendovascular Interventions

Little evidence supports acquisition of routine head imaging after uncomplicated elective neurosurgical procedures for patients with unchanged neurological examinations; however, imaging is still performed by some neurointerventionalists. We assessed the clinical utility of routine computed tomography of the head (CTH) following elective neuroendovascular interventions, including aneurysm coiling, aneurysm stent-assisted coiling, aneurysm flow diversion, arteriovenous malformation/fistula embolization, middle meningeal artery embolization for subdural hematoma, extracranial carotid artery stenting, and venous sinus stenting. Retrospective chart review identified patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention from 2011 to 2021 at our institution. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables, including presenting signs and symptoms, antiplatelets and/or anticoagulant medications, intraprocedural complications, postprocedural CTH findings, and postprocedural neurological examinations, were recorded. Association of clinical variables with an abnormal postprocedural CTH was assessed with univariate analysis. Patients with ruptured vascular pathology, preoperative embolizations, and missing postprocedural CTH images and/or reports were excluded. Of 509 procedures identified, 354 were eligible for analysis; 4.8% of patients (17/354) had abnormal findings on postprocedural CTH. Nine patients had intraprocedural complications or new postprocedural neurological deficits that would have prompted imaging regardless of institutional practice. None of the remaining 8 (2.3%) patients required additional procedures. New postprocedural neurological deficit was the only significant predictor of abnormal postprocedural CTH (odds ratio= 6.79; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-20.32; P= 0.0009). In a large cohort of patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular intervention, no patients were identified for whom routine postprocedural CTH alone meaningfully altered their clinical care. Routine CTH is not necessary after uncomplicated elective neuroendovascular interventions performed with careful postprocedural neurological assessment.

Effects of COVID-19 on Neurosurgical Service: Perspective from a Tertiary Medical Center in Nigeria.

Background The outbreak of COVID-19 caused a significant impact on neurosurgical case volume in Nigeria due to the widespread recommendation to minimize elective procedures and redistribute healthcare resources to support COVID-19 patients. This study aims to analyze the effect of COVID-19 in one tertiary care Nigerian hospital on the demographic characteristics, diagnostic classes, and elective/non-elective procedure statuses. Methods A retrospective single-center chart review study was conducted to review all patients undergoing a neurosurgical procedure between March to June in 2019 and 2020. Descriptive data on patient age, gender, sex, diagnosis, surgical procedure, elective/non-elective surgery status, and month and year of admission were recorded. Diagnoses were categorized into one of seven types by author review. Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Tests were utilized to test for independence of the categorical variables to the year of patient admission, and a Welch two-sample t-test was used to test for a significant difference in mean age between the two cohorts. Results A total of 143 cases were reviewed. There was a 59.8% reduction in overall neurosurgical case volume with an 82% reduction in elective procedures (39 vs. 7, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.15 – 8.77) between 2019 and 2020. No significant differences were noted in patient cohorts when comparing demographic characteristics, diagnosis type, or month of admission between the two years. Conclusion There was a significant reduction in elective neurosurgical procedures during the early months of COVID-19 in Nigeria. Further studies should consider examining the effects of COVID-19 into 2021.

Choose Your Patients Wisely: A Preoperative Protocol to Reduce Surgical Site Infection Rates in Elective Neurosurgical Procedures

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common and costly of all hospital-acquired infections, occurring in 5 percent of patients and accounting for 20% of all hospital-acquired infections. Preoperatively, we developed a protocol where patients were screened using hemoglobin A 1c (HbA1c) and nasal swabs. If HbA1c was greater than 9, patients were rescheduled for surgery when their HbA1c was less than 9. All patients then underwent nasal swabs to identify methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus/methicillin-resistant S.aureus in addition to standard chlorhexidine gluconate bathing. If positive, mupirocin ointment was used to treat the patients 5 days prior to surgery. We sought to measure the effectiveness of this protocol in reducing SSI in elective neurosurgical patients who were undergoing hardware implantation or had a procedure anticipated to last greater than 2 hours. This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures at Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center from 1/1/2014 to 06/30/2016. The intervention period was from 7/1/2016 to 12/20/2018, which included the patients undergoing the protocol. The preintervention group consisted of 817 cases with a 2.7% infection rate (22 SSIs). The intervention group consisted of 822 cases with a 0.1% infection rate (1 SSI). This observed difference was statistically significant (P= 0.003). This retrospective review of a presurgical protocol with measuring of HbA1c and nasal swabs revealed a significant decrease in the infection rate of patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. Additional investigations are necessary; however, we recommend its use.

Predictive risk factors for venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients: A retrospective analysis single center cohort study

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) has a major effect on morbidity and mortality in neurosurgical patients. However, identifying risk factors that may be useful in practice is a challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and determine the predictors of VTE in patients undergoing neurosurgery. Materials and methodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted on adult patients admitted to a private hospital for a primary elective neurosurgical procedure between January 2015 and December 2020. Univariate analysis was used to examine clinical factors, and multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of VTE. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve demonstrated the fitting model and discrimination power. ResultsA total of 350 patients who underwent neurological surgery were identified. There were 26 patients (7.4%) with VTE. The final predictors were found to be statistically significant in the multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, including non-Asian populations (p value < 0.001, odds ratio [OR]: 6.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.20–16.89), lack of postoperative ambulation (p value = 0.009, OR: 9.25, 95% CI = 1.17–48.83), and septic shock complication (p value = 0.001, OR: 5.36, 95% CI = 1.46–19.62). The AUROC was 0.708 (95% CI 0.61–0.80). ConclusionAlthough the incidence of VTE in patients receiving neurosurgery is minimal, it is also higher in non-Asian patients, those who lack of postoperative ambulation, and patients with septic shock complications. This approach may be useful to predict thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients. External validation of the prognostic model requires more investigation.

Patterns and outcomes of neurosurgery in England over a five-year period: A national retrospective cohort study

BackgroundNeurosurgical practice has seen major changes over several decades. There are no recent evaluations of national neurosurgical practice. The aim of this observational study was to describe neurosurgical practice in England and to use outcomes to assess and benchmark the quality of care in neurosurgery. Material and methodsThis national retrospective cohort study analysed Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data from April 2013 to March 2018 for all adult admissions with a specialty code for neurosurgery. The epidemiology of patients and RCS Charlson comorbidities were derived and procedure incidence rates per 100,000 person-years calculated. Post-operative outcomes for elective and non-elective patients included: median length of stay, the proportion of patients requiring additional inpatient neurosurgical procedures, the proportion of patients discharged to their usual address, and in-hospital mortality rates. ResultsDuring the 5-year study period, there were 371,418 admissions to neurosurgery. The proportion of admissions involving a neurosurgical procedure was 77.3% (n = 287,077). Of these, 45% were for cranial surgery and 37% for spinal. Overall, 68.3% were elective procedures. The incidence rates of most procedures were low (<20 per 100,000 person-years). Following elective neurosurgical procedures, in-hospital mortality rates for cranial and spinal surgery were 0.5% (95% CI, 0.5–0.6) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0.04–0.1), respectively. After non-elective neurosurgery, mortality rates were 7.4% (95% CI, 7.2–7.6) and 1.3% (95% CI, 1.2–1.5) for cranial and spinal surgery, respectively. Approximately 1 in 4 patients had additional procedures following non-elective cranial surgery (24%; 95% CI, 23.6–24.3). Outcomes were highly variable across different subspecialty areas. ConclusionsThe incidence rates of neurosurgical procedures are low within England, and neurosurgical units have a high volume of non-surgical admissions. In-hospital mortality rates after elective neurosurgery are low but there may be opportunities for quality improvement programmes to improve outcomes for non-elective surgery as well as ensuring equitable access to treatment.

REDUCING POST OPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING (PONV) IN NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES: OUR TERTIARY CARE EXPERIENCE

Aim:Patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures were observed to determine the therapeutic efficacy of two different dosages of palonosetron. Materials and Methods:Patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures were randomly allocated to one of three groups: control (n = 30), 0.05 mg palonosetron (n = 30), or 0.075 mg palonosetron (n = 30). At the start of the dura mater closure, the medicines were administered intravenously. Anesthesia was maintained with 1 MAC sevoflurane in a 50/50 combination of air and oxygen. The patients were observed for 72 hours after extubation for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results:The 0.075 mg palonosetron group had considerably less nausea than the control group in the first 6 hours (P = 0.019). At 0–72 hours after surgery, the incidences of nausea, retching, and vomiting in the 0.075 mg palonosetron group were considerably lower than in the 0.05 mg palonosetron or saline groups (P 0.001). Conclusion:PONV was decreased more efficiently in the 0.075 mg palonosetron group than in the 0.05 mg palonosetron and control groups in neurosurgicalpatients.

Incidence and perioperative risk factors for surgical site infections in neurosurgery: prospective observational study

BackgroundSurgical site infections (SSI) represent a burden on the health care system especially in developing countries with significant morbidity and mortality. In Egypt, especially in our institution, there is no registry for the SSI rate or the contributing factors with no clear guidelines regarding the regimen of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Our study was conducted to assess the local practice and to calculate the rate and risk factors of SSI.Patients and methodsA prospective registry was established at the Neurosurgery Department, Demerdash teaching hospital Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. All patients who underwent elective neurosurgical procedures were included in this study. Trauma patients were excluded. Patients were followed-up for incident SSI for 1 month postoperatively. SSIs were identified based on CDC criteria and a standardized data collection form predictor variables including patient characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors along with the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis.ResultsThe study included 248 patients with 1-month postoperative follow-up. An SSI rate of 19% was recorded being mainly in patients below 10 years of age. Postoperative CSF leak was noticed to be the most significant risk factor of SSI in our study (p value < 0.01). Sixty five percent of culture results showed infection with gram-negative bacilli with the predominance of Acinetobacter.ConclusionProlonged use of perioperative antibiotics does not seem to have an added benefit in SSI prevention. Tailoring of the used antibiotic regimen is highly recommended according to the latest antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines and the local culture and sensitivity results.

Evaluation of the HemoCue® for blood loss estimation in suction fluid in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures: A prospective observational study.

Blood loss in neurosurgical procedures can be rapid and tremendous leading to consequential hemodynamic instability. HemoCue is a portable photometer used for the measurement of blood hemoglobin concentration. Using this point of care device, we contemplated this study to assess the reliability of HemoCue for suction hemoglobin determination and calculation of surgical blood loss by comparing with the gold standard laboratory Coulter Counter method in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. This prospective observational study was conducted in 233 patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures in the age group of 18 to 60 years and having preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) values above 9 g/dL. Values of preoperative hemoglobin, suction hemoglobin, and volume in the suction container were used to obtain the estimated blood loss. The normality of the data was tested using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Bland Altman analysis was used to test the reliability of HemoCue in estimating hemoglobin and blood loss with reference to the gold standard laboratory Coulter Counter automated hematology analyzer. Median blood loss calculated in our study using HemoCue was 554.65 mL with an interquartile range of 336.81 mL to 982.39 mL. Laboratory counter method estimated median blood loss was 533.37 mL with an interquartile range of 335.21 mL to 994.73 mL. The majority of the data obtained and analyzed using the Bland and Altman analysis method were within a 95% confidence interval. The HemoCue method is a reliable method and henceforth can be used to estimate blood loss in suction fluid in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Thromboprophylaxis in Pediatric Neurosurgery and Spinal Injury: Current Trends and Literature Review

Although the entities of venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, and thromboprophylaxis in adult patients undergoing brain tumor and spine surgery, traumatic brain injury and elective neurosurgical procedures are widely elucidated, the same is not valid when pediatric patients are under consideration. An attempt to review the peculiarities of these patients through a comprehensive bibliographic review is undertaken. We performed a narrative summary of the relevant literature dedicated to pediatric patients, centered on traumatic brain injury, the general incidence of thromboembolic disease in this patient population, the role of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE, and its role in elective neurosurgical procedures, including spinal operations. Additionally, the risk of deep venous thrombosis in elective neurosurgical procedures is reviewed. Due to inherent limitations of the current studies, particularly a restricted number of patients, our data are underpowered to give a definitive protocol and guidelines for all the affected patients. Our current conclusions, based only on pediatric patients, argue that there is limited risk of VTE in pediatric patients suffering from brain tumors and that the possibility of VTE is very low in children undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures. There is no consensus regarding the exact incidence of VTE in traumatic brain injury patients. LMWH seems to be a safe and effective choice for the "at risk" pediatric patient population defined as being older than 15 years, venous catheterization, nonaccidental trauma, increased length of hospital stays, orthopaedic (including spinal) surgery, and cranial surgery.