Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

Spontaneous Inferior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes

The incidence and related factors of spontaneous occlusion of a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) without pre-emptive embolisation remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the incidence, clinical implications and predictors of spontaneous IMA occlusion after EVAR. This was a single centre, retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2007 and 2022 were categorised into three groups (group 1, spontaneous IMA occlusion; group 2, patent IMA with no type II endoleak (T2EL) from IMA; group 3, T2EL from IMA). Endpoints were the incidence of spontaneous IMA occlusion, sac enlargement, freedom from re-intervention, and overall survival after EVAR. Of 372 cases of elective EVAR for AAA, 230 who had patent IMA pre-operatively were analysed, after excluding 127 with pre-occluded IMA and 15 who underwent pre-emptive IMA embolisation. Spontaneous IMA occlusion occurred in 101 patients (43.9%). Sac enlargement rate was lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3. Freedom from re-intervention rate was higher in group 1 than in group 3 but did not differ between groups 1 and 2. Multivariate analysis revealed the absence of antiplatelet therapy, pre-operative higher haematocrit, absence of concomitant iliac artery aneurysm, posterior thrombus in the sac, and use of Endurant as predictors associated with spontaneous IMA occlusion. Spontaneous IMA occlusion was observed in 7.1% and 77.5% of patients with zero and four or five predictors, respectively. Spontaneous IMA occlusion occurred in nearly half of cases and was associated with positive clinical outcomes. In patients with a high prediction of spontaneous IMA occlusion, pre-emptive IMA embolisation may be omitted.

Impact of frailty on outcomes of patients undergoing elective endovascular thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Frailty and it score assessment by the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) have been recently proposed in surgery to overcome chronological age and major comorbidities as predictor tools of the surgical risks. We aim to evaluate the impact of frailty on outcomes of patients undergoing TAAA endovascular repair and whether CFS may be used as screening tool in the preoperative work-up and peri-operative risk stratification. REtrospective analysis of 76 patients (61 male, 74.9±6.9 years) undergoing elective branched-EVAR. Patients were divided in Group A (CFS<5) and Group B (CFS≥5). Post-operative morbidity, access-site related-complications, ICU- and in-hospital length-of-stay, reintervention rate, surgery- and all-causes related mortality were evaluated. Fifty-four patients (71.1%) were classified as CFS<5, whereas twenty-two as CFS≥5. Demographics and comorbidities were homogeneous regardless of CFS class. No differences in term of MAE and of access-site related-complication but a greater perioperative and early mortality rate in the group of frail patients was noted (P=0.009, OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.35-3.58; P=0.019, respectively), as a longer hospitalization (P=0.007) and more frequent non-home discharge. Mid-term aneurysm- and all-causes related mortality was similar in both groups. Frailty seems to be associated with worse perioperative outcomes. CFS is a reliable tool to quantify the degree of disability due to frailty and to better assess the risks and benefits of endovascular TAAA repair. Frailty is not equated with inoperability but indicate the need for a tailored approach for the more vulnerable patients. Larger studies and a widespread use of frailty screening methods are needed to confirm its efficacy in the prediction of outcomes after endovascular interventions.

Presence of Atherosclerosis in Multiple Arterial Beds is Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Patients with polyvascular disease are considered high risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). This retrospective study utilised the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database to quantify the effect of polyvascular disease on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The VQI database was queried from to 2012 - 2022 for elective EVAR. Patients were identified as having peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, or cerebrovascular disease, and then stratified based on the number of arterial beds involved (one to three). Primary outcomes were peri-operative death and MACEs. Multivariate analysis was performed to find associations between comorbidities and primary outcomes. Of the 21 160 patients with arterial disease included in the study, 83.7% were male and the mean age was 73.73 ± 8.57 years. After stratification, 16 892 patients had atherosclerosis in one arterial bed, 3 869 in two arterial beds, and 399 in three arterial beds. Pre-operatively, patients with atherosclerosis in three arterial beds were more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and renal failure (all p < .001). Post-operatively, patients with disease in three arterial beds were more likely to experience a post-operative complication (11.5% vs. 8.3% vs. 5.4%; p < .001), including MACE (4.6% vs. 4.1% vs. 2.8%; p < .001) and death (3.0% vs. 2.5% vs. 1.7%; p < .010). On multivariate analysis, polyvascular disease was associated with MACEs (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.29 - 1.84; p < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimates showed statistically significant differences in survival at approximately the three year follow up (p < .001). In this review of patients undergoing elective EVAR, patients with polyvascular disease experienced worse peri-operative outcomes, including death and MACEs, the latter of which was confirmed on multivariable analysis. These patients should be considered high risk and managed accordingly.

The Association between Plasma Proinflammatory Cytokine Concentrations and Endoleak after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The most common complication after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is continuous sac perfusion, known as endoleak. Evaluating markers released from the aneurysm wall into circulation has been suggested as a possible alternative for detecting endoleaks. The aim of this study was to examine whether circulating concentrations of different proinflammatory interleukins (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were elevated in patients with endoleak after EVAR. A prospective observational study with 100 patients undergoing elective EVAR was conducted. Blood samples were taken before surgery, at 7 days, 6 months, and 12 months after EVAR to quantify the mentioned cytokines using a Bio-Plex assay. Patients were followed up for 12 months to detect endoleak occurrence. In patients with endoleak, mean concentrations of certain cytokines in plasma differed significantly from those without endoleak: preoperative IL-8 (9.83; p<0.001), preoperative MCP-1 (75.94; p=0.003), preoperative TNF-α (5.46; p=0.05), among others. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative IL-8 (p=0.003), MCP-1 at 7 days postoperative (p = 0.002), and IL-1 at 12 months postoperative were significantly associated with endoleak, with IL-1 being the most influential biomarker (OR=2.2). A ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.7, with cutoff points of 33.4 for preoperative IL-8, 145 for MCP-1 at 7 days postoperative, and 2.3 for IL-1 at 12 months postoperative. This study suggests that inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-1, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α have the potential to serve as important adjuncts to conventional imaging techniques in monitoring patients post-EVAR. These biomarkers may help identify individuals at higher risk of developing endoleaks, guiding more focused and timely imaging follow-up. However, their practical applicability requires further investigation.

The Safety and Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Elderly: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) increases with age. Previous trials confirm that elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an effective intervention for AAA. However, few elderly patients were recruited into randomized trials, whereas in contemporary clinical practice, elective repair is commonly performed on octogenarians. We evaluated the safety and outcome of elective EVAR in elderly patients to inform clinical practice and vascular service provision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting risk of complications and death in patients undergoing elective EVAR was performed (PROSPERO CRD: 42022308423). Observational studies and interventional arms of randomized trials were included if the outcome rates or raw data were provided. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were longer-term mortality, 30-day major adverse events, and aneurysm-related mortality. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Exclusion criteria were emergency procedures, non-infrarenal aneurysms, and lack of octogenarian data. A total of 41 studies were eligible from 10 099 citations, including 10 national and 5 international registries, 26 retrospective studies, and our own prospective cohort. The analysis included 208 997 non-octogenarians (mean age=70.19 [SD=0.62]) and 106 188 octogenarians (mean age=83.75 [SD=0.35]). The 30-day mortality post-elective EVAR was higher in octogenarians (1.08% in non-octogenarians, 2.31% in octogenarians, odds ratio [OR]=2.27 [2.08-2.47], p<0.0001). Linear regression demonstrated a 0.83% increase in 30-day mortality for every 10-year age increase above 60 years old. Mortality for octogenarians increased significantly during follow-up: 11.35% (OR=1.87 [1.65-2.13], p<0.001), 22.80% (OR=1.89 [1.52-2.35], p<0.001), 32.00% (OR=1.98 [1.66-2.37], p<0.001), 47.53%, and 51.08% (OR=2.40 [1.90-3.03], p<0.001) at 1-through-5-year follow-up, respectively. The 30-day major adverse events after elective EVAR were higher in octogenarians (OR=1.75-2.83, p<0.001). Octogenarians experience higher but acceptable peri-operative morbidity and mortality compared with younger patients. However, 3-year to 5-year survival is very low among octogenarians. Our findings challenge the notion of routine intervention in elderly patients and support very careful selection for elective EVAR. Many octogenarians with peri-threshold (<6 cm) AAAs may derive no benefit from EVAR due to limited 3-year to 5-year overall survival and low risk of aneurysm rupture with conservative management. An adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted. Octogenarians with infra-renal AAA are increasingly managed with elective EVAR. Previous studies have demonstrated that EVAR is safer than open repair for octogenarians, with lower peri-operative mortality and major adverse events. However, randomised trials, on which much of contemporary evidence is based, recruited a relatively younger population of participants. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a contemporary synthesis of the literature comparing outcomes in octogenarians to younger patients. The results of this analysis, together with low rupture rates amongst octogenarians in existing literature, question the benefit of routine elective intervention for peri-threshold aneurysms and an adjusted threshold for intervention in octogenarians may be warranted.

Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Managed with the EndurantTM Endograft under Elective Setting.

Background/Objectives: Device selection during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remains an important issue for ensuring endograft durability. This study evaluated the early and follow-up outcomes of elective EVAR with the Endurant platform. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted including consecutive elective EVAR procedures with the Endurant II/IIs (2008 to 2024) device. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality and major complications at 30 days. Survival, endoleak I/III and freedom from reintervention were secondary outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were employed for risk-adjusted follow-up outcomes. Results: In total, 361 patients were included (72.7 ± 7 years; 96% males; mean AAA diameter 62 ± 14 mm); 92% received a bifurcated device, and 89% conformed to the instructions for use. Technical success was 99.7%. Intra-operative adjunctive procedures included 4.4% proximal cuffs and 1.7% endoanchors. The thirty-day mortality rate was 0.6%, and the major complication rate was 4.1%. Survival was 81% (SE 4.8%), 72% (SE 6.4%) and 52% (SE 9.2%) at 4, 6 and 8 years, with aneurysm-related mortality at 1.7%. Freedom from endoleak Ia was 76% (SE 7.3%) at 6 years, freedom from endoleak Ib was 79% (SE 7.4%) at 7 years and freedom from endoleak III was 94% (SE 3.7%) at 5 years. Freedom from reintervention was 71% (SE 6.1%) and 55% (SE 7.9%) at 5 and 7 years, respectively. No device-related co-factor affected long-term outcomes. Conclusions: Endurant II/IIs endograft is a safe and effective EVAR solution with excellent early outcomes and low long-term aneurysm-related mortality. The need for reintervention in the long term affected less than 50% of cases.

Impaired Pre-operative Ambulatory Capacity in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Associated with Increased Peri-operative Death

While ambulatory capacity is a readily assessable clinical indicator of functional status, its association with outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between pre-operative ambulatory status and outcomes following elective EVAR. A retrospective review of the multi-institutional Vascular Quality Initiative database was conducted for all patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR from 2009 - 2022. Patients were categorised into independent ambulation and impaired ambulation groups. A propensity score matched analysis was performed to produce two well matched cohorts in a 1:1 ratio without replacement. The primary outcome was 30 day death. Secondary outcomes included one year survival and in hospital major complications. Among 11 474 patients, 10 539 (91.8%) were independently ambulatory pre-operatively. Propensity score matching resulted in 885 matched pairs. The impaired ambulation group, although older (mean 77.6 vs. 76.3 years; p= .001), showed comparable baseline characteristics. Post-operatively, the impaired ambulation group had higher cumulative in hospital complications and death as well as 30 day death. Even after adjustment for age, impaired pre-operative ambulation was associated with increased in hospital and 30 day death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26 - 3.95; p= .006). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increasing cumulative risk of 30 day death in the setting of impaired pre-operative ambulatory status with age > 75 years requiring post-operative red blood cell transfusion > 2 units (HR 5.75, 95% CI 2.09 - 15.88; p < .001). Beyond 30 days, impaired pre-operative ambulation was not associated with increased one year death (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.81 - 1.48; p= .570). Among patients who underwent elective infrarenal EVAR in this matched analysis, impaired pre-operative ambulatory capacity was associated with an increased risk of in hospital and 30 day death, further compounded by advanced age and post-operative transfusion. As such, a threshold higher than the traditional size criteria should be considered in shared decision making when determining options for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm in this high risk cohort.

Factors associated with nonhome discharge after endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThis study aims to identify preoperative factors associated with nonhome discharge (NHD) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). NHD has implications for patient care, readmission, and long-term mortality; nevertheless, the existing literature lacks information regarding factors associated with NHD for patients undergoing EVAR. In contrast, our study assesses preoperative factors associated with NHD for this population by using national data from the Vascular Quality Initiative. MethodsWe identified adult patients who underwent elective EVAR in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2003-2022) and excluded those who were not living at home preoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify preoperative factors associated with NHD. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox-regression analyses were used to assess the impact of NHD on 5-year survival as a secondary outcome. ResultsWe included 61,792 patients, of which 3155 (5.1%) had NHD. NHD patients were more likely to be older (79 years [interquartile range, 73-18 years] vs 73 years [interquartile range, 67-79 years]), female (33.7% vs 18.2%; P < .001), non-White (16.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), and have more comorbidities. NHD patients had higher rates of postoperative complications (acute kidney injury, 11.9% vs 2.0% [P < .001]; myocardial infarction, 3.8% vs 0.5% [P < .001]; and in-hospital reintervention, 4.7% vs 0.5% [P = .033]). Multivariable analysis revealed many preoperative characteristics were associated with higher odds of NHD: most notably, age (per additional decade: odds ratio [OR], 2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-2.28; P < .001), female sex (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.63-1.95; P < .001) and aneurysm diameter >65 mm (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.98-2.39; P < .001), along with potentially modifiable factors, including anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, weight, and diabetes. In contrast, aspirin, statin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocekr use were associated with lower odds of NHD. NHD was associated with higher hazards of 5-year mortality, even after adjusting for confounders (40% vs 14%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.86-2.44; P < .001). ConclusionsSeveral factors were associated with higher odds of NHD after elective EVAR, including nonmodifiable factors such as female sex and larger aortic diameter, and potentially modifiable factors such as anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic heart failure, body mass index, and diabetes. Special attention should be given to populations with nonmodifiable factors, and efforts at optimizing medical conditions with higher NHD likelihood seems appropriate to improve patient outcomes and quality of life after EVAR.

Metformin Use and Long-term Outcomes Including Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following EVAR for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: "A Retrospective Study".

Metformin, widely used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM), has shown potential for inhibiting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth by reducing extracellular matrix remodeling and inflammation. However, its influence on clinical outcomes and aneurysm sac dynamics after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains uncertain. This retrospective study aims to explore the effects of metformin on long-term outcomes following EVAR. Patients who underwent elective standard EVAR for infrarenal AAA at a single academic Dutch hospital from 2000 to 2022 were included. We collected baseline patient demographics, comorbid conditions, anatomical and operative characteristics, and 30-day postoperative events. Metformin use was defined as using it preceding EVAR. The primary outcome, the postoperative aneurysm sac volume over time, was investigated using linear mixed-effects modeling. The secondary outcomes, 8-year all-cause mortality and freedom from graft-related events, were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods. We analyzed 685 patients, including 634 (93%) non-metformin users and 51 (7%) metformin users. The median follow-up period was similar (4.0 years [IQR=1.5, 6.5] vs 5.0 years [IQR=2.0, 8.0]; p=0.091). Patients on metformin had a preoperative aneurysm sac volume of 153 cc (IQR=114, 195) compared with 178 cc (IQR=133, 240) for non-metformin patients (p=0.054). At 30 days post-EVAR, metformin patients had a comparable mean aneurysm sac volume compared with non-metformin patients (metformin: -19.4 cc [95% confidence interval [CI]: -47.4, 8.5]; p=0.173). The effect of metformin on aneurysm growth over time was not significant (-3.9 cc/year; [95% CI: -22.7, 14.9]; p=0.685). Following risk-adjusted analysis, metformin use was associated with similar rates of all-cause mortality (metformin vs no metformin: 50% vs 44%; hazard ratio [HR]=1.11, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.88; p=0.688) and freedom from graft-related events (metformin vs no metformin: 63% vs 66%; HR=1.82, 95% CI: 0.98, 3.38; p=0.059). Although metformin use may reduce preoperative AAA growth, it does not seem to influence overall/long-term post-EVAR AAA sac dynamics, all-cause mortality, or freedom from graft-related events. These findings suggest that the potential protective effect of metformin on AAA may not be sustained after EVAR. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying the potential role of metformin in AAA management following EVAR. There is currently no approved pharmacological treatment available to slow the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth rate and reduce the related risk of rupture. In our retrospective analysis including 685 patients undergoing EVAR for infrarenal AAA, we found that metformin use was not associated with improved post-EVAR outcomes, such as a reduction of aneurysm sac volume over time, eight-year all-cause mortality, or freedom of graft-related events. These findings suggest that the potential protective effect of metformin on AAA may not be sustained after EVAR and underscore the need for ongoing research into this area.

Postimplantation syndrome after endovascular aortic repair: Impact of endograft material and a review of the literature

Aim: Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a systemic inflammatory response occurring acutely after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with reported incidence ranging from 14% to 60%. This study aimed to evaluate the association of different endograft materials with the manifestation and severity of PIS and the role of thrombus formation with type II endoleak incidence. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent elective EVAR between January 2021 and January 2024. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 171 patients were included. The patients had a mean age of 70.3±8.6 years and 93% were male. Patients were divided into PIS and Non-PIS groups, with a subgroup analysis within the PIS group comparing polyester and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) materials. Patient outcomes post-discharge and within the first-year post-surgery were evaluated. Results: No early mortality was observed. PIS was diagnosed in 39.2% of the patients. There was no significant difference on longer intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital stays among the PIS and Non-PIS groups. The incidence of PIS was significantly higher in the polyester subgroup (60%) compared to the ePTFE subgroup (25%). Univariate logistic regression identified polyester material as the factor associated with PIS (P=0.03). First-year computed tomographic angiography (CTA) follow-ups showed a statistically significant lower incidence of type II endoleak (p=0.01) and higher new thrombus formation (p=0.04) in the polyester group. Conclusion: Following EVAR, the patients experience systemic inflammatory responses influenced by the choice of endograft material. Polyester endografts are associated with a higher incidence of PIS and thrombogenicity but a lower incidence of type II endoleak in our study.

Leveraging The Vascular Quality Initiative To Reduce Length Of Stay Following Elective Carotid Endarterectomy And Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Leveraging The Vascular Quality Initiative To Reduce Length Of Stay Following Elective Carotid Endarterectomy And Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, computed tomography-derived body composition, systemic inflammation and survival after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A retrospective cohort study.

Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPEX) is selectively used before intervention for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Sarcopenia, a chronic condition defined by reduced skeletal muscle function and volume, can be assessed radiologically by computed tomography (CT)-derived body composition analysis (CT-BC), and is associated with systemic inflammation. The aim was to describe the association between CT-BC, CPEX, inflammation and survival in patients undergoing elective intervention for AAA. Patients were recruited retrospectively from a single, secondary-care centre-operative database. Cases undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) between 31 March 2015 and 25 June 2020 were included. There were 176 patients (130 EVAR, 46 OSR) available for analysis in the final study; median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 60.5 [27] months, and all completed a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Preoperative CPEX tests were recorded. CT sarcopenia score [CT-SS, range 0 to 2, calculated based on normal/low SMI (0/1) and normal/low SMD (0/1)] assessed radiological sarcopenia. Preoperative modified Glasgow Prognostic score (mGPS) was used to assess systemic inflammation. Mean [95% confidence interval (CI) survival in the CT-SS 0 vs. CT-SS 1 vs. CT-SS 2 subgroups was 80.1 (73.6 to 86.6) months vs. 70.3 (63.5 to 77.1) months vs. 63.8 (53.4 to 74.2) months] ( P = 0.01). CT-SS was not associated with CPEX results ( P > 0.05). Elevated CT-SS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.89, P < 0.01] was independently associated with increased hazard of long-term mortality; however, CPEX results were not ( P > 0.05). CPEX test results were not consistently associated with body composition and did not have significant prognostic value in patients undergoing elective treatment for AAA.

Impact of Frailty and Sarcopenia on Thirty-Day and Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of frailty and sarcopenia on the survival of patients with AAA undergoing elective endovascular repair (EVAR). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE). The association of frailty or sarcopenia with 30-day mortality and late survival was expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis random effects models were applied. The five-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used as a frailty metric and sarcopenia was determined using computed tomography angiography (CTA) with measurements of the total psoas muscle area. Frailty was defined as patients with mFI-5 ≥ 0.6 and sarcopenia was defined as the total psoas muscle area (TPA) within the lowest tertile. Results: Thirteen observational cohorts reporting a total of 56,756 patient records were eligible for analysis. Patients with frailty (mFI-5 ≥ 0.6) had significantly increased 30-day mortality than those without frailty (random effects method: OR, 4.84, 95% CI 3.34-7.00, p < 0.001). Patients with sarcopenia (lowest TPA tertile) had significantly increased 30-day mortality according to the fixed effects method (OR, 3.30, 95% CI 2.17-5.02, p < 0.001), but not the random effects method (OR, 2.64, 95% CI 0.83-8.39, p = 0.098). Patients with sarcopenia or frailty had a significantly increased hazard ratio (HR) for late mortality than those without frailty or sarcopenia according to the random effects method (HR, 2.39, 95% CI 1.66-3.43, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity of the studies was low (I2: 0.00%, p = 0.86). The relation of frailty to age extracted from four studies demonstrates that the risk of frailty increases with age according to the random effects method (standard mean differences, SMD, 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.61, p < 0.001). The heterogeneity of the studies was low (I2: 0.00%, p = 0.64). Conclusions: Patients with sarcopenia or frailty have a significantly increased risk of mortality following elective EVAR. Prospective studies validating the use of frailty and sarcopenia for risk prediction after EVAR are needed before these tools can be used to support decision making.

Outcomes and Survivability in Octogenarians After Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Outcomes and Survivability in Octogenarians After Elective Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair under local anesthesia through bilateral percutaneous femoral access is a safe strategy to improve early outcomes and reduce hospital stay.

To estimate the impact of anesthetic conduct, alone and in combination with the type of femoral access, on early results after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A retrospective multicenter analysis on patients undergoing elective standard EVAR at four academic centers was performed. Patients undergoing the procedure through either local or general anesthesia were compared. Comparative subanalyses of the two groups were performed for the type of femoral access to evaluate further impact on outcomes. Five hundred twenty-four patients underwent elective standard EVAR, of which 207 (39.5%) under general anesthesia and 317 (60.5%) under local anesthesia. Patients who underwent general anesthesia had higher 30-day mortality rates (3.4% vs. 0.3%, P=0.005), as well as slightly worse 30-day major systemic complication rates (8.2% vs. 5.4%, P=0.195). There were no differences in terms of reinterventions (2.1% vs. 2.5%, P=0.768) and aneurysm-related mortality (0% vs. 0.4%, P=0.422) at one year. Total intervention times were significantly longer in the general anesthesia group (126 vs. 89 minutes, P=0.001), as well as the total length of hospital stay (7.6 vs. 5.3 days, P=0.007). At subanalyses, the combination of local anesthesia with bilateral percutaneous femoral access further improved 30-day outcomes and determined an additional reduction in total intervention times and ICU stays. EVAR performed under local anesthesia has a significantly better impact on early results when compared to general anesthesia. Combining percutaneous bilateral femoral access to local anesthesia reduced procedural times, ICU stays and consequently improved early results.

Hospital Volume of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair as a Predictor of Mortality After Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Registry data suggest that centralising abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery decreases the mortality rate after AAA repair. However, the impact of higher elective volumes on ruptured AAA (rAAA) repair associated mortality rates remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine associations between intact AAA (iAAA) repair volume and post-operative rAAA death. Using data from official national registries between 2015 - 2019, all iAAA and rAAA repairs were separately analysed across 10 public hospitals. The following were assessed: 30 day and 12 month mortality rate following open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Associations between the 5 year hospital iAAA repair volumes (organised into tertiles) and rAAA associated mortality rate were analysed, regardless of treatment modality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to identify iAAA volume thresholds for decreasing the rAAA mortality rate. Subanalysis by treatment type was conducted. Threshold analysis was repeated with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to confirm the findings. A total of 1 599 iAAAs (80.2% EVAR, 19.8% OSR) and 196 rAAAs (66.3% EVAR, 33.7% OSR) repairs were analysed. The median and interquartile range of the volume/hospital/year for all iAAA repairs were 39.2 (31.2, 47.4). The top volume iAAA tertile exhibited lower rAAA associated 30 day (odds ratio [OR] 0.374; p= .007) and 12 month (OR 0.264; p < .001) mortality rates. The ROC analysis revealed a threshold of 40 iAAA repairs/hospital/year (EVAR+ OSR) for a reduced rAAA mortality rate. Middle volume hospitals for open iAAA repair had reduced 30 day (OR 0.267; p= .033) and 12 month (OR 0.223; p= .020) mortality rates, with a threshold of five OSR procedures/year. The MCMC procedure found similar thresholds. No significant association was found between elective EVAR volumes and ruptured EVAR mortality. Higher iAAA repair volumes correlated with a lower rAAA mortality rate, particularly for OSR. The recommended iAAA repair threshold is 40 procedures/year and five procedures/year for OSR. These findings support high elective volumes for improving the rAAA mortality rate, especially for OSR.

The Ratio Between the Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameter Is a Predictor of Durable Proximal Seal After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

The aim of this study was to assess whether the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the suprarenal aortic diameter is a predictor for a durable proximal seal after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A total of 439 patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2004 and 2018 in a single vascular referral center met our inclusion criteria. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 different suprarenal aortic diameters. Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak (n=20) or proximal neck dilatation mandating revision (n=8) were compared with the 411 patients without long-term proximal seal complications. Patients who developed a late type 1A endoleak had more frequently hypertension, a shorter infrarenal neck length, and a larger mean infrarenal neck diameter. The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to all 4 suprarenal aortic diameters was higher in the late type 1A endoleak group compared with the group without a late type 1A endoleak. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression identified a combination of 6 variables as the best combination to predict a late type 1A endoleak: presence of hypertension, increased mean infrarenal neck diameter, decreased aneurysm neck length, larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), larger ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the upper renal artery, and increased β-angle. Of these, based on both the univariate area under the curve (AUC) and optimal LASSO model restricted to a single predictor, the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA (AUC, 0.770; cutoff value, 0.997) was considered the best prognostic variable. The ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. Patients with mean infrarenal neck diameter larger than the diameter proximal to the SMA (ratio >1) are at risk for a late type 1A endoleak. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we found that the ratio of the mean infrarenal neck diameter to the aortic diameter proximal to the SMA is a good predictor for a late type 1A endoleak. We conclude that the suprarenal diameter must be taken into account before assessing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair eligibility. Patients with a ratio >1 may not be the best candidates for a durable result after EVAR and may be better off with fenestrated EVAR or open repair.

Local Anesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Allows for Accurate Graft Deployment with Durable Results

ObjectiveLocal anesthesia (LA) is sparsely used in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) despite short term benefit, likely secondary to concerns over patient movement preventing accurate endograft deployment. The objective of this study is to examine the association between anesthesia type and endoleak, sac regression, reintervention, and mortality. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative database was queried for all EVAR cases from 2014-2022. Patients were included if they underwent percutaneous elective EVAR with anatomical criteria within instructions for use of commercially approved endografts. Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score weighting lysis was used to determine the association between anesthesia type on the risk of any endoleak noted by intra-operative completion angiogram and sac regression. Multivariable survival analysis with propensity score weighting was used to determine the association between anesthesia type and endoleak at 1 year, long-term reintervention and mortality. Results13932 EVARs met inclusion criteria: 1075 (8%) LA and 12857 (92%) general anesthesia (GA). On completion angiogram, LA was associated with fewer rates of any endoleaks overall (16% vs 24%, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis with propensity score weighting, LA was associated with similar adjusted odds of any endoleak on intra-operative completion angiogram (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.47-0.68) as well as combined type 1a and type 1b endoleaks (OR 0.72, 05%CI 0.47-1.09). Follow-up computed tomography imaging at 1 year was available for 4892 patients, 377 (8%) LA and 4515 (92%) GA. At 1 year, LA was associated similar rate of freedom from any endoleaks compared to GA (0.66 (95%CI 0.63-0.69) vs 0.71 (95%CI 0.70-0.72), p=0.663) and increased rates of sac regression (50% vs 45% p=0.040). On multivariable analysis with propensity score weighting, LA and GA were associated with similar adjusted odds of sac regression (OR 1.22, 05%CI 0.97-1.55). LA and GA had similar rates endoleak at 1 year (HR 0.14, 95%CI 0.63-1.07), however LA was associated with decreased hazards of combined type 1a and 1b endoleaks at 1 year (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.80-0.96). LA and GA had similar adjusted long-term reintervention rate (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.44-1.38) and long-term mortality (HR 1.100, 95%CI 079-1.25). ConclusionLA is not associated with increased adjusted rates of any endoleak on completion angiogram or at 1-year follow-up compared to GA. LA is associated with decreased adjusted rates of yype 1a and type1b endoleak at 1 year, but similar rates of sac regression, long term reintervention and mortality. Concerns for accurate graft deployment should not preclude use of LA and LA should be increasingly considered when deciding on anesthetic type for standard elective EVAR.

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

The aim of the study was to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between patients under and over the age of 80 with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). From 2011 to 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with AAA patients who received elective EVAR. Primary outcomes included hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, and the need for re-interventions. Secondary outcomes included aneurysm-related mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. A total of 77 (62.6%) patients under the age of 80 years old and 46 (37.4%) octogenarians were included in the study. The male gender and AAA diameter did not differ among groups (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 and 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectively). The younger patients had a higher prevalence of tobacco use (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). There were no deaths during the index hospitalization. The incidence of reinterventions (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) and acute kidney injury (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) did not differ between groups, but the length of stay was longer for octogenarian patients (3 days [2-4] vs. 2 days [2-3, p = 0.04)]. Endoleaks were the most common cause for re-interventions (81.8%), with a prevalence of 34% across the entire cohort. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes between groups. In octogenarian patients with AAA, EVAR represents a safe procedure both during the index hospitalization and during long-term follow-up.