Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Articles

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

Procedural and long-term outcomes of elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians

The aim of the study was to compare the immediate and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between patients under and over the age of 80 with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). From 2011 to 2017, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with AAA patients who received elective EVAR. Primary outcomes included hospital mortality, length of stay, acute kidney injury, and the need for re-interventions. Secondary outcomes included aneurysm-related mortality, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. A total of 77 (62.6%) patients under the age of 80 years old and 46 (37.4%) octogenarians were included in the study. The male gender and AAA diameter did not differ among groups (92.2% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.11 and 5.4 cm [4.9-6.2 cm] vs. 5.4 cm [5-6 cm], p = 0.53, respectively). The younger patients had a higher prevalence of tobacco use (72.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.01). There were no deaths during the index hospitalization. The incidence of reinterventions (5.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.11) and acute kidney injury (14.3% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.18) did not differ between groups, but the length of stay was longer for octogenarian patients (3 days [2-4] vs. 2 days [2-3, p = 0.04)]. Endoleaks were the most common cause for re-interventions (81.8%), with a prevalence of 34% across the entire cohort. There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes between groups. In octogenarian patients with AAA, EVAR represents a safe procedure both during the index hospitalization and during long-term follow-up.

Stationäre Frührehabilitation nach endovaskulärer und offener Versorgung eines Bauchaortenaneurysmas bei über 65-Jährigen: Indikation und langfristiges Outcome

BackgroundIn Germany, there is no data available on the frequency of inpatient rehabilitation (IR) after elective endovascular (EVAR) and open (OAR) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. ObjectiveTo report for the first time on the outcome of patients 65 years and older and thus of retirement age with and without IR after AAA repair in a retrospective analysis of routine data from all eleven regional companies of the AOK health insurance fund (AOK-Gesundheit). MethodsAnonymized data of 16,358 patients 65 years and older with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with EVAR (n = 12,960) or OAR (n = 3,398) between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2016 were analyzed. Patients with postoperative IR (n = 1,531) were compared to those without postoperative IR (n = 14,827) with respect to general patient characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, and survival. The average follow-up of patients with postoperative and without postoperative IR was 49.9 months and 51.8 months, respectively. Results5.4% of EVAR patients, but 24.6% of OAR patients were referred to IR (p < 0.001). Patients with IR were sicker than those without IR. Parameters significantly influencing the use of IR included OAR vs EVAR (Odds Ratio [OR] 6.03), condition after cerebral infarction (OR 1.53), and women vs men (OR 1.49). Perioperative influencing parameters were cerebral infarction (OR 2.40), blood transfusions (OR 2.21) and complex critical care (OR 2.15). After nine years, the Kaplan-Meier estimated survival was 41.9% for patients with vs 43.4% for those without IR in the EVAR group (p = 0.178). For OAR, it was 50.2% for patients with IR vs 49.8% for patients without IR (p = 0.006). In multivariate regression analysis, postoperative IR had a significant effect on long-term survival in OAR but not in EVAR patients. ConclusionThere are no generally binding guidelines for the indication of IR after AAA repair. It should therefore be a requirement for the future that the fitness of each patient with elective AAA repair be determined with a score before and after the procedure in order to make indications for AHB more comparable. The score should be documented in the hospital discharge letter.

Octogenarians fare better under local anesthesia for elective endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveWith an aging patient population, an increasing number of octogenarians are undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in the United States. Multiple studies have shown that, for the general population, use of local anesthetic (LA) for EVAR is associated with improved short-term and long-term outcomes as compared with performing these operations under general anesthesia (GA). Therefore, this study aimed to study the association of LA for elective EVARs with perioperative outcomes, among octogenarians. MethodsThe Vascular Quality Initiative database (2003-2021) was used to conduct this study. Octogenarians (Aged ≥80 years) were selected and sorted into two study groups: LA (Group I) and GA (Group II). Our primary outcomes were length of stay and mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, return to operating room, cardiopulmonary complications, and discharge location. ResultsOf the 16,398 selected patients, 1197 patients (7.3%) were included in Group I, and 15,201 patients (92.7%) were in Group II. Procedural time was significantly shorter for the LA group (114.6 vs 134.6; P < .001), as was estimated blood loss (152 vs 222 cc; P < .001). Length of stay was significantly shorter (1.8 vs 2.6 days; P < .001), and patients were more likely to be discharged home (LA 88.8% vs GA 86.9%; P = .036) in the LA group. Group I also experienced fewer pulmonary complications; only 0.17% experienced pneumonia and 0.42% required ventilator support compared with 0.64% and 1.02% in Group II, respectively. This finding corresponded to fewer days in the intensive care unit for Group I (0.41 vs 0.69 days; P < .001). No significant difference was seen in 30-day mortality cardiac, renal, or access site-related complications. Return to operating room was also equivocal between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis confirmed GA was associated with a significantly longer length of stay and significantly higher rates of non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59; P < .001 and AOR, 1.40; P = .025, respectively). When stratified by the New York Heart Association classification system, classes I, II, III, and IV (1.55; P < .001; 1.26; P = .029; 2.03; P < .001; 4.07; P < .001, respectively) were associated with significantly longer hospital stays. ConclusionsThe use of LA for EVARs in octogenarians is associated with shorter lengths of stay, fewer respiratory complications, and home discharge. These patients also experienced shorter procedure times and less blood loss. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality, return to operating room, or access-related complications. LA for octogenarians undergoing EVAR should be considered more frequently to shorten hospital stays and decrease complication rates.

Abstract 14618: Comparative Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Preoperative Cardiac Stress Testing

Introduction: The use of cardiac stress testing (CST) before endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) repair is controversial. While prior research has explored the utility of CST before EVAR, EVAR outcomes in patients with different CST results have not been studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate EVAR outcomes in patients with abnormal CST. Hypothesis: Patients with abnormal CST before EVAR have inferior outcomes compared to patients with normal CST. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database for EVAR was reviewed. Patients who underwent CST prior to elective EVAR were included. In VQI, abnormal CST is defined as having ischemia, infarction, or both ischemia and infarction (BII). Outcomes of patients with normal and abnormal CST were compared, including a subgroup analysis of CST abnormalities. Results: A total of 19,964 patients were included and 23.7% (4,723) had abnormal CST. Patients with abnormal CST were more commonly males with comorbidities. Patients with abnormal CST had significantly more perioperative complications including MACE and one-year mortality compared to patients with normal CST. ( Table ) Regression analysis revealed that abnormal CST was independently associated with increased perioperative MACE (OR=1.59 [1.28-1.97]) and one-year mortality (HR=1.11 [1.00-1.23]). Subgroup analysis of patients with abnormal CST showed that patients with BII had significantly more perioperative MACE (6.8% vs 4.1%, P =0.002) and mortality (1.1% vs 0.4%, P =0.040) compared to patients with either ischemia or infarction. BII was independently associated with MACE (OR=1.62 [1.06-2.41]) and 30-day mortality (OR=3.28 [1.21-8.16]) compared to either abnormality. Conclusions: Patients with abnormal CST have worse outcomes after elective EVAR compared to patients with normal CST, particularly patients with BII. CST is a useful tool for perioperative and long-term risk stratification in patients undergoing elective EVAR.

Predictors of 30-Day Postoperative Outcome after Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Tertiary Referral Center Experience.

We evaluated the 30-day postoperative outcome after elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the possible predictors for the 30-day postoperative outcome. Demographics, medical history, laboratory values, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 30-day complications classified as major (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), acute kidney injury (AKI) and death of any cause) and minor (postimplantation syndrome (PIS), postoperative delirium (POD), urinary tract infection (UTI) and technical graft failure) were documented (March 2016 to February 2019). We included 322 patients. The majority were managed under general anesthesia (83%) with femoral cutdown (98.1%). Overall, 121 (37.5%) complications, mostly minor (n = 103, 31.9%), were recorded. In total, 11 patients (3.4%) developed MACEs, 5 (1.6%) experienced AKI and 2 (0.6%) died in the ICU. Moreover, 77 patients (23.9%) suffered from PIS, 11 from POD, 11 from UTI and 4 from technical graft failure. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that aneurysm diameter (p = 0.01) and past smoking (p = 0.003) were predictors for complications. PAD was an independent predictor of MACEs (p = 0.003), preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of AKI (p = 0.003) and past smoking of PIS (p = 0.008), respectively. Our study showed that the 30-day morbidity after EVAR exceeded 35%. However, the majority of complications were minor, and the associated mortality was low. Aneurysm diameter and past smoking were independent predictors for postoperative outcome.

Development and Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol to Reduce Length of Stay following Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be performed safely with a short postoperative length of stay (LOS). We aimed to develop and assess the impact of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) on LOS after elective EVAR. Pre-ERP development single center retrospective review of elective EVAR procedures from January 2012 to December 2019. ERP was developed by targeting factors associated with prolonged LOS (>2days) elucidated from semistructured interviews and Bayesian additive regression tree analysis. Post-ERP development, a subsequent retrospective review of elective EVAR performed from January 2018 to June 2021 was performed to evaluate LOS before and after ERP. Primary outcome was LOS. Two hundred sixteen patients underwent elective infrarenal EVAR from 2012 to 2019. Periprocedural factors identified as associated with LOS >2days included noncommercial insurance (43.6% vs. 26.5%; P=0.01), preoperative anemia (hemoglobin 12.56 g/dL vs. 13.57 g/dL; P=0.001), worse renal function (creatinine 1.31 mg/dL vs. 1.01/dL; P=0.004), open femoral access (74.4% vs. 26.5%; P<0.001), intensive care unit (ICU) stay (2.7days vs. 0.9days; P<0.001), postoperative anemia (9.8 g/dL vs. 11.9 g/dL; P<0.001), postoperative creatinine (1.55 mg/dL vs. 0.97 mg/dL; P<0.001), and beta blocker need on discharge (45.5% vs. 25%; P=0.003) as significant between patients with short and prolonged LOS groups. Semistructured interviews revealed postoperative day 1 complete blood count/chemistry, postoperative physical therapy evaluation, ICU admission, urinary retention, patient expectations, and unavailability of transportation home as modifiable factors that delayed early discharge. A 14-component ERP was created to target the factors identified from combined qualitative and quantitative results. Post-ERP development, 74 elective EVAR patients were reviewed from 2018 to 2021 (37 pre-ERP and 37 post-ERP). Following ERP development, the mean LOS was reduced from 2.6 (standard deviation: 1.9) to 1.3days (standard deviation: 1.3); P<0.01. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission, postoperative complications, emergency room visits, or 90-day mortality before and after the ERP was used. Practice and procedural factors can be modified through an informed and safe process to reduce LOS after elective EVAR. LOS following elective EVAR was safely reduced following the use of a systematically developed ERP.

The Roles of Liver Fibrosis Scores and Modified Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio Values in Predicting Contrast-Induced Nephropathy after Elective Endovascular Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) methods are higher preferred for the treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Various markers, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, have been used to predict the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), and modified stress hyperglycemia ratio (mSHR) values in predicting CIN. Patients who had undergone elective endovascular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in our clinic between January 2015 and January 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Patients who did not develop contrast-induced nephropathy after the procedure were identified as Group 1, and those who did were referred to as Group 2. A total of 276 patients were included in the study. The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, and left ventricular ejection fraction. In Group 2, the FIB-4 score, APRI, and mSHR values were significantly higher (p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In Group 2, the contrast volume and number of packed blood products used (median 1 (1-4) vs. 2 (1-5)) were significantly higher (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively). In this study, we demonstrated that we may predict the risk of CIN development with preoperatively calculated, noninvasive liver fibrosis scores and mSHR.

Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers increases the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the major treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); however, EVAR still carries a considerable risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). The present study aimed to investigate the risk factors for AKI after elective EVAR procedures. This was a retrospective observational study. Eligible patients who underwent EVAR from September 2011 to March 2019 in West China Hospital were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of AKI within two days after EVAR, which was defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guideline. Demographics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory tests, anatomical parameters of AAA, and relative operative details were collected as variables. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to identify the risk factors among variables, and covariate interactions were further assessed. A total of 679 eligible patients were included. The incidence of postoperative AKI was 8.2% (56/679) in the whole cohort, and it was associated with a lower 5-year survival rate (63.5% vs . 80.9%; χ 2 = 4.10; P = 0.043). The multivariable logistic regression showed that chronic kidney disease (OR, 5.06; 95% CI: 1.43-17.95; P = 0.012), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (OR, 2.60; 95% CI: 1.17-5.76; P = 0.019), and short neck (OR, 2.85; 95% CI: 1.08-7.52; P = 0.035) were independent risk factors for postoperative AKI. In the covariate interaction analysis, the effect of ACEIs/ARBs use on postoperative AKI was similar across all subgroups ( P > 0.05), thereby suggesting a robust effect of ACEIs/ARBs use in all patients undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Postoperative AKI was associated with lower survival rate, and the use of ACEIs/ARBs was the only adjustable independent risk factor. Clinicians should consider withdrawing ACEIs/ARBs in high-risk patients undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to prevent postoperative AKI.

Female sex is associated with reintervention and mortality following elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Although sex differences in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes have been increasingly reported, the determination of contributing factors has not reached a consensus. We investigated the disparities in sex-specific outcomes after elective EVAR at our institution and evaluated the factors that might predispose women to increased morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective medical record review of all patients who had undergone elective EVAR from 2011 to 2020 at a suburban tertiary care center. The primary outcomes were 5-year survival and freedom from reintervention. The Fisher exact test, t tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis using the rank-log test were used to investigate the associations between sex and outcomes. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model controlling for age and common comorbidities evaluated the effect of sex on survival and freedom from reintervention. A total of 273 patients had undergone elective EVAR during the study period, including 68 women (25%) and 205 men (75%). The women were older on average than were than the men (76years vs 73years; P ≤ .01) and were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (38% vs 23%; P= .01), require home oxygen therapy (9% vs 2%; P=.04), or dialysis preoperatively (4% vs 0%; P= .02). The distribution of other common vascular comorbidities was similar between the sexes. The 30-day readmission rate was greater for the women than for the men (18% vs 8%; P= .02). The women had had significantly lower survival at 5years (48%± 7.9% vs 65%± 4.3%; P< .01) and significantly lower 1-year (women, 89%± 4.1%; vs men, 94%± 1.7%; P= .01) and 5-year (women, 69%± 8.9%; vs men, 84%± 3.3%; P= .02) freedom from reintervention. On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.9), congestive heart failure (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-3.9), and older age (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1) were associated with 5-year mortality. Female sex remained as the only variable with a statistically significant association with 5-year reintervention (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9). Female sex was associated with decreased 5-year survival and increased 1- and 5-year reintervention after elective EVAR. Data from our institution suggest that factors beyond patient age and baseline health risk likely contribute to greater surgical morbidity and mortality for women after elective EVAR.

Investigation of Renal Decline and New Onset Dialysis Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

The purpose of this study is to identify variables significantly associated with renal function decline after elective endovascular infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and to identify the rate and risks of subsequent progression to dialysis. Specifically, we investigate the long-term impact of supra-renal fixation, female gender, and physiologically stressful perioperative events on renal function following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Review of all EVAR cases in the Vascular Quality Initiative between 2003 and 2021 was conducted to investigate variable associations with three primary outcomes: postoperative acute renal insufficiency (ARI); greater than 30% decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients beyond 1year of follow up; and new onset dialysis requirement at any point in follow up. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed for the events of acute renal insufficiency and new onset dialysis requirement. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed regarding long term GFR decline. Postoperative ARI occurred in 3.4% (1692/49772) of patients. Significant (P < .05) association with postoperative ARI was noted for: age (OR 1.014/year, 95% CI 1.008-1.021); female gender (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.27-1.67); hypertension (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.50); anemia (OR 4.24, 95% CI 3.71-4.84); reoperation at index admission (OR 7.86, 95% CI 6.47-9.54); baseline renal insufficiency (OR 2.29, 95% CI 2.03-2.56); larger aneurysm diameter; increased blood loss; and higher volumes of intra-operative crystalloid. Risk factors (P < .05) correlating with a decline of 30% in GFR at any time beyond 1year were: female gender (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.24-1.65); body mass index (BMI) less than 20 (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.74); hypertension (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.64); diabetes (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17-1.53); COPD (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07-1.37); anemia (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.52-2.42); baseline renal insufficiency (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.49); absence of discharge ace-inhibitor (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.42); long term re-intervention (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.84-3.21) and larger AAA diameter. Patients who experienced long term GRF decline had a significantly higher long-term morality. New onset dialysis following EVAR occurred in .47% (234/49772) of those meeting inclusion criteria. Higher rate (P < .05) of new onset dialysis was associated with age (OR 1.03/year, 95% CI 1.02-1.05); diabetes (OR 1.376, 95% CI 1.005-1.885); baseline renal insufficiency (OR 6.32, 95% CI4.59-8.72); Reoperation at index admission (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.03-5.67); postoperative ARI (OR 23.29, 95% CI 16.99-31.91); absence of beta blocker (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.12-2.49); long term graft encroachment on renal arteries (OR 4.91, 95% CI 1.49-16.14). New onset dialysis following EVAR is a rare event. Perioperative variables influencing renal function following EVAR include blood loss, arterial injury, and reoperation. Supra-renal fixation is not associated with postoperative acute renal insufficiency or new onset dialysis in long term follow up. Renal protective measures are recommended for patients with baseline renal insufficiency undergoing EVAR as acute renal insufficiency following EVAR portends a 20-fold increased risk of new onset dialysis in long term follow up.

Late Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Tertiary Low-Volume Hospital in Brazil

The aim of this study is to report early and long-term results of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a tertiary low-volume hospital in Brazil. Between October 2006 and May 2017, 120 patients underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The interventions were reviewed retrospectively, focusing on 30-day mortality, long-term survival, and freedom from reintervention. Late outcomes were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. The follow-up's median and interquartile range was 3 (1-5) years. Overall, most patients were males (75%) and the median age was 74years. Mostly patients were at a high risk for intervention (79.1%) and the majority was classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists III (53.3%). Preoperative aneurysm diameter median was 60mm, interquartile range was 52.7-69. As per the postoperative aneurysm sac evolution, the number of patients with a reduction, stabilization, or an increase was 93 (77.5%), 18 (15%), and 9 (7.5%), respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6.6% and no late aneurysm-related deaths were identified. The overall incidence of late endoleaks was 24.1%, with the predominance of type II (23.3%), followed by type IA (0.8 %). Secondary interventions were necessary for 9 patients (7.5%). The 6-year analyses revealed freedom from reintervention and overall survival of 87.9% and 57.7%, respectively. The Cox regression analyses identified age > 75years as an adverse factor for overall survival (hazard ratio=2.5; P=0.021). In the present study, EVAR in a low-volume center was associated with high 30-day mortality, but satisfactory long-term results were identified.

Long-term Outcomes Associated With Open vs Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Medicare-Matched Database

Endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with a significant reduction in perioperative mortality and morbidity compared with open aneurysm repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, this benefit decreases over time owing to increased reinterventions and late aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair. To compare long-term outcomes of endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. This multicenter retrospective cohort study used deidentified data with 6-year follow-up from the Medicare-matched Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. Patients undergoing first-time elective endovascular or open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from 2003 to 2018 were propensity score matched. Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, concomitant procedures, or prior history of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, were excluded. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2018. First-time elective endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The primary long-term outcome of interest was 6-year all-cause mortality, rupture, and reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and perioperative complications. Among a total of 32 760 patients (median [IQR] age, 75 [70-80] years; 25 706 [78.5%] men) who underwent surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, 28 281 patients underwent endovascular repair and 4479 patients underwent open repair. After propensity score matching, there were 2852 patients in each group. Open repair was associated with significantly lower 6-year mortality compared with endovascular repair (548 deaths [35.6%] vs 608 deaths [41.2%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = .002), with increases in mortality starting from 1 to 2 years (84 deaths [4.3%] vs 126 deaths [6.7%]; HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.83; P = .001) and 2 to 6 years (211 deaths [25.8%] vs 241 deaths [30.6%]; HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61-0.88; P = .001). Open repair, compared with endovascular repair, also was associated with significantly lower rates of 6-year rupture (117 participants [5.8%] vs 149 participants [8.3%]; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.97; P < .001) and reintervention (190 participants [11.6%] vs 267 participants [16.0%]; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80; P < .001). Open repair was associated with significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.41-5.26; P < .001) and complications. These findings suggest that overall mortality after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was higher with endovascular repair than open repair despite reduced 30-day mortality and perioperative morbidity after endovascular repair. Endovascular repair additionally was associated with significantly higher rates of long-term rupture and reintervention. These findings emphasize the importance of careful patient selection and long-term follow-up surveillance for patients who undergo endovascular repair.

Female Sex Predicts for Five-Year Reintervention and Mortality After Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Although sex differences in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes have been increasingly reported, the causes have remained ill-defined. We investigated the disparities in sex-specific outcomes after elective EVAR at our institution and evaluated the factors that might predispose women to increased morbidity and mortality.

The impact of obesity on perioperative and postoperative outcomes after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Obesity is a common and growing health problem in vascular surgery patients, as it is in all patient groups. Evidence regarding body mass index (BMI) on endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) outcomes is not clear in the literature. We aimed to determine the impact of obesity on perioperative and midterm outcomes of elective EVAR between obese and non-obese patients. Under a retrospective study design, a total of 120 patients (109 males, 11 females, mean age: 74.45 ± 8.59 (53-92 years)) undergoing elective EVAR between June 2012 and May 2020 were reviewed. Patients were stratified into two groups: obese (defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2) and non-obese (mean BMI < 30kg/m2 (32.25 ± 1.07kg/m2 vs 25.85 ± 2.69kg/m2)). Of the 120 patients included in the study, 81 (67.5%) were defined as "nonobese," while 39 (32.5%) were obese. The mean BMI of the study group was 27.93 ± 3.78kg/m2. In obese patients, the procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product (DAP) values were longer than those of non-obese patients: 89.74 ± 20.54 vs 79.69 ± 28.77 min (p = 0.035), 33.23 ± 10.14 vs 38.17 ± 8.61 min (p = 0.01) and 133.69 ± 58.17 vs 232.56 ± 51.87Gy.cm2 (p < 0.001). Although there was no difference in sac shrinkage at 12-month follow-up, there was a significant decrease at 6-month follow-up in both groups (p = 0.017). Endoleak occurred in 17.9% (n = 7) of the obese group versus 11.1% (n = 9) of the non-obese group (p = 0.302). Iliac branch occlusion developed in four patients, 3 (3.7%) in the non-obese group and 1 (2.6%) in the obese group (p = 0.608). The all-cause mortality rate was slightly higher in the obese group; however, it did not differ between the groups (p = 0.463). In addition to the longer procedure times, fluoroscopy times, and DAP values in obese patients, regardless of obesity, significant sac shrinkage in the first 6months of follow-up was observed in both groups. No difference was documented with regards to mortality or morbidity following EVAR.

Monitored Anesthesia Care Without Foley Placement Decreases Hospital Length of Stay in Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Hospital length of stay (LOS) plays a significant role in healthcare costs and efficiency. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms has the advantage of a shorter LOS compared with open repair. Based on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, the LOS after EVAR is 2.9 days, with only 19% requiring >4 days of hospitalization. We assessed whether the LOS can be safely shortened with a protocol of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) without Foley catheter placement in EVAR.

Effect of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy on Perioperative Mortality After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

One in five patients undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) will have left ventricular dysfunction. Yet, little is known about the perioperative risks of the different types of cardiomyopathy. We compared the outcomes of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) undergoing EVAR with those of patients with non-ICM (NICM).

Female Sex Predicts for Risk of Reintervention After Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Sex differences in outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been increasingly reported, although the factors influencing this disparity have not been well-defined. We investigated the sex differences for elective EVAR outcomes at our institution and evaluated the factors that might predispose women to increased morbidity and mortality.

The relation between physical fitness, frailty and all-cause mortality after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BackgroundAccurate determination of probable surgical outcomes is fundamental in decision-making regarding appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment. These outcomes depend, among other factors, on patient-related factors such as physical fitness. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between physical fitness, measured by the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score and the five-factor Modified Frailty Index (MFI-5), and all-cause mortality. MethodsFour hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing elective endovascular treatment of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) from January 2011 to September 2018 were identified in an existing local abdominal aortic aneurysm database. Physical fitness was measured by the MFI-5 and the METs as registered during preoperative screening. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality and secondary end points included 5-year all-cause mortality, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm-related reinterventions. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman's rho and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. The effect of physical fitness on mortality was assessed by binary logistics regression analyses. ResultsThere was a positive correlation between the MFI-5 and 1-year all-cause mortality (Rho = 0.163; P = .001), but not between the METs and 1-year all-cause mortality (Rho = –0.083; P = .124). A significant correlation between both MFI-5 and METs and 5-year all-cause mortality was observed (Rho = 0.255; P < .001 and Rho = –0.154; P = .004). When stratified by the MFI-5, the 1- and 5-year follow-up survival rates were 95.1% and 85.9%, respectively, in the group with the lowest MFI-5 and 74.5% and 33.1% in the group with the highest MFI-5 score (P = .007 and P < .001). When stratified by METs categories for 1-year follow-up, no significant differences in survival between the groups were observed (P = .090). The 5-year follow-up survival rate was 39.4% in the lowest METs category and 76.3% in the highest METs category (P = .039). Logistic regression analysis, assessing the impact of age, sex, METs, and the MFI-5 on the risk of all-cause mortality, showed that only age and the MFI-5 made a significant contribution. ConclusionsThere is a significant positive association between the MFI-5 and both the 1- and 5-year all-cause mortality rates after EVAR; METs only correlated with the 5-year all-cause mortality. Only age and the MFI-5 contributed to predicting overall survival after EVAR; therefore, it could be recommended to add the MFI-5 for guidance in preoperative counselling.

Impact of frailty on acute outcomes of endovascular thoracic and abdominal aneurysm repair

BackgroundWhile coding-based frailty tools may readily identify at-risk patients, they have not been adopted into screening guidelines for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or thoracic endovascular aortic repair at the national level. We aimed to characterize the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes and resource use after endovascular aneurysm repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair using a nationally representative cohort. MethodsThe 2005 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify all adults undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients were considered “frail” if they suffered from any frailty-defining diagnoses in the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups. Multivariable regression models were used to identify independent associations with outcomes of interest including in-hospital mortality, nonhome discharge, and hospitalization costs. ResultsOf an estimated 301,869 patients, 273,415 (90.6%) underwent endovascular aneurysm repair and the remainder thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Frailty prevalence was lower in the endovascular aneurysm repair cohort (2.3%) compared with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (4.7%). After adjustment, frailty was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (endovascular aneurysm repair odds ratio 4.0; thoracic endovascular aortic repair odds ratio 2.5), nonhome discharge rates (endovascular aneurysm repair odds ratio 7.2; thoracic endovascular aortic repair odds ratio 4.2), and predicted costs (endovascular aneurysm repair ß coefficient +$10.6K; thoracic endovascular aortic repair ß coefficient +$38.2K) for both cohorts. ConclusionGiven that frailty portends inferior outcomes for both endovascular aneurysm repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair, its inclusion in existing risk models may better inform shared decision-making.