Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Research Articles

Response to “A Call to Action to Remove ACPE Limits on Non-Patient Care Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences”

Response to “A Call to Action to Remove ACPE Limits on Non-Patient Care Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences”

A Call to Action to Remove ACPE Limits on Non-Patient Care Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences

The terms practice ready and direct patient care are evolving as the pharmacy profession transforms into a wide-ranging field of highly trained individuals. In a crowded job market, students are seeking opportunities to utilize their training beyond traditional patient care roles. As pharmacy colleges and schools update curricula to reflect current practice and drive this transformation, they are faced with the challenge to accommodate student interest in these growing nontraditional areas with the limit of two non-patient-care elective advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). This Commentary aims to bring attention to the curricular confinement by accreditation standards on elective APPEs. The time is right as ACPE is gathering input for standards revision. This is a call to action to remove the restriction of non-patient-care elective APPEs, support nontraditional career interests, and enhance opportunities for advocacy, leadership development, and innovation without sacrificing developing proficient direct patient-care skills for all future pharmacy professionals.

An Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience in Leadership Development

Objective. To describe the development and implementation of an advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in leadership.Methods. A leadership APPE was created and continuously improved over five years from being mostly content-oriented to being more of an experiential offering by identifying and implementing rich, practical leadership experiences. Activities included PhotoVoice, Power of Full Engagement, What's Your Passion?, Transformational Leadership, Speech Acts, a Mindfulness Retreat, PeoplePack Dynamics, and a rowing experience at an Olympic training facility. After five years of developing and refining the APPE, faculty coordinators sought student feedback on the APPE beyond using a standardized APPE evaluation form students complete at the end of each rotation.Results. The majority of students agreed with all of the evaluation items. Items with the highest mean agreement included: content from previous didactic leadership courses were reinforced in the rotation; relevance of the rotation to one's career; rotation objectives facilitated learning; and a variety of teaching methods helped in applying knowledge to future practice. Analysis of comments regarding the leadership APPE identified three main themes: gratitude, development, and more connection.Conclusion. An elective APPE with the primary purpose of leadership training and development can be created and incorporated into the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. This leadership APPE can serve as an example for other institutions interested in implementing a similar experience.

Factors That Influence Students’ Selection of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience

Objective. To determine factors influencing Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' selection of advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) in one school of pharmacy. Methods. In their final year, PharmD students are required to complete a minimum of 1440 hours of experiential education, including ambulatory, community, inpatient general medicine, and hospital/health system APPEs, and elective APPEs. Third-year (P3) and fourth-year (P4) PharmD students were invited to complete an anonymous online survey to determine what factors impacted their decision process when selecting their required experiences. Students selected up to five factors that most influenced their selection of APPEs. Factors included areas of interest, size of institution, location, future employment, preceptor reputation, rotation hours, faculty rotation, non-faculty rotation, peer recommendation, cost/housing, level of difficulty, size of institution, and whether the site offered a residency program. Results. Of the 143 students enrolled, 100% responded to the survey. Students in both classes (71 P3 and 72 P4 students) selected location as the number one factor that influenced their decision when selecting required APPEs. Cost/housing was the second most important factor overall for P3 students, while peer recommendation was the second most important factor overall for P4 students. Conclusion. Location was the driving factor behind P3 and P4 pharmacy students' selection of APPE sites. Schools should consider establishing more APPE sites that offer housing to reduce cost. Further research into the factors that influence ranking on APPE electives is warranted.

Student perceptions of the value they bring to APPE sites

IntroductionPartner institutions invest much time and effort into educating pharmacy students, and ideally students should be viewed as valuable to those sites. Prior studies have demonstrated the perceptions that preceptors and administrators have about the value of students at their sites. However, students' perceptions of their own value at practice sites have not been described. Students do have perceptions about their own value to sites, and such information could be useful in learning about potential areas in which students perceive they are making an impact on patient care. MethodsFive hundred qualitative student responses to an evaluation question regarding perceived value were analyzed from a United States pharmacy school. Nineteen categories of value were extracted. Responses fit into multiple categories, resulting in 783 data points for analysis. The categories were analyzed overall and with respect to advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) type (acute care, community, hospital, ambulatory care, and elective). Descriptive statistics were used. ResultsProviding patient counseling (15.7%) and therapeutic recommendations (14.7%) were the highest perceived values. In adult acute care and hospital APPEs, “providing therapeutic recommendations” (24.4% and 19.1% respectively) were rated highest. In community, ambulatory care, and elective APPEs, “providing patient counseling” (25%, 23%, and 13.8%, respectively) was highest rated. ConclusionsStudents perceive they are valuable to practice sites in several ways. These results demonstrate that students' self-reported perceptions of the value they bring to their sites are consistent with other literature reports based on perception of preceptors regarding student value to patient care.

An interprofessional clinical toxicology advanced pharmacy practice experience

Background and purposeClinical toxicology is a blend of science, research, and patient management practices involving human poisonings from exposure to natural and synthetic toxins. The objective of this study was to describe the components of an elective advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in clinical toxicology at California Poison Control System (CPCS). Educational activity and settingThe APPE requirements included a mix of active participation in case management and supplemental educational exercises, case presentations and consultations, and a structured self-study component consisting of readings and on-line modules. In addition, there were two active learning activities, high acuity poisoning simulation scenarios utilizing a high-fidelity mannequin, and an antidote tasting session. FindingsFrom April 2012 to October 2017, 82 student pharmacists completed this APPE. Pharmacy students completed 85 pre-simulation surveys and 80 post-simulation surveys. Survey results showed an increase in pharmacy student beliefs that a clinical pharmacist should be involved in the differential diagnosis and management of patients (60% pre-simulation vs. 78.8% post-simulation, p = 0.009). APPE pharmacy students completed an evaluation of the preceptors(s), site, and learning experience. The average score for all areas on the preceptor and site evaluations was >4.5 on a 5-point Likert scale. Qualitative data themes included student satisfaction with opportunities, feedback, and the interprofessional and collaborative environment. SummaryAn APPE in the CPCS was successfully designed and implemented. The APPE provides an interprofessional collaborative learning environment that allows student pharmacists to understand the unique role of the pharmacist in this setting.

A Qualitative Study Designed to Build an Experiential Education Curriculum for Practice-Ready Community Pharmacy-Bound Students

Objective. To design an experiential education curriculum that sequentially and deliberately prepares community pharmacy-bound graduates to practice at the level of the care provider and display the skills needed to be a pharmacist-in-charge. Methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacy stakeholders. Transcriptions from the interviews were analyzed to identify common themes in needed community pharmacy training for core and elective advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). The themes were used to distinguish key elements of a community pharmacy experiential education curriculum that would meet the project objective. Results. Forty-two individuals were interviewed: 11 were interviewed individually and 31 in focus groups, with each group comprising two to six individuals. There were 11 focus groups. Theme analysis allowed differentiation of activities and performance levels for the community pharmacy introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE) and the core APPE as well as the goal of the core APPE for all program graduates. Participants identified two important elective APPEs for students planning to practice in community pharmacy after graduation: an advanced patient care experience and a management experience. Participants emphasized the importance of sequencing the core and advanced elective APPEs so that the advanced electives could build upon the skills demonstrated in the core APPE. Participants identified knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed for practice-readiness upon graduation. Conclusion. The identified experiential education curriculum for students planning to practice in the community pharmacy setting upon graduation will prepare them to provide care to complex community-dwelling patients and function as a pharmacist-in-charge in this setting.

The Offering, Scheduling and Maintenance of Elective Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) provides standards for colleges of pharmacy to assist in the provision of pharmacy education to student pharmacists. An integral part of all college educational programs includes the provision of experiential learning. Experiential learning allows students to gain real-world experience in direct patient care during completion of the curriculum. All college of pharmacy programs provide several Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPEs), which include a balance between the four required experiences and a number of other required or elective APPEs. Required APPEs include advanced community, advanced institutional, ambulatory care, and general medicine. The elective APPEs include a myriad of opportunities to help provide a balanced education in experiential learning for student pharmacists. These unique opportunities help to expose student pharmacists to different career tracks that they may not have been able to experience otherwise. Not all colleges offer enough elective APPEs to enable the student pharmacist to obtain experiences in a defined area. Such an approach is required to produce skilled pharmacy graduates that are capable to enter practice in various settings. Elective APPEs are scheduled logically and are based upon student career interest and site availability. This article describes the offering, scheduling and maintenance of different elective APPEs offered by The University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy.

Complete-block scheduling for advanced pharmacy practice experiences

An innovative approach to meeting increased student demand for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) is described, including lessons learned during a two-year pilot project. To achieve more efficient allocation of preceptor resources, the University of Florida College of Pharmacy (UFCOP) adopted a new APPE rotation model in which 20 pharmacy students per year complete all required and elective APPEs at one practice site, an affiliated academic medical center. Relative to the prevailing model of experiential training for Pharm.D. students, the "complete-block scheduling" model offers a number of potential benefits to students, preceptors, and the pharmacy school. In addition to potentially reduced student housing expenses and associated conveniences, complete-block scheduling may enable (1) more efficient use of teaching resources, (2) increased collaboration among preceptors, (3) greater continuity and standardization of educational experiences, and (4) enhanced opportunities for students to engage in longer and more complex research projects. The single-site APPE rotation model also can provide value to the training site by enabling the extension of clinical pharmacy services; for example, UFCOP students perform anticoagulation monitoring and discharge medication counseling at the host institution. Despite logistical and other challenges encountered during pilot testing of the new scheduling model, the program has been well received by students and preceptors alike. Complete-block APPE scheduling is a viable model for some health systems to consider as a means of streamlining experiential education practices and helping to ensure high-quality clinical rotations for Pharm.D. students.

Variety and Quantity of Professional Electives

To compare the elective courses offered by US colleges and schools of pharmacy to establish a benchmark for individual colleges and schools to use in assessing whether they offer a sufficient amount and variety of electives. Internet Web sites of US doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) programs were reviewed to identify the number of elective lecture-based courses and elective advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPE) offered and required. Elective courses were grouped into categories to determine the variety of offerings. Pharmacy students were required to complete a mean of 7 hours of classroom-based elective courses. Thirty-two lecture-based elective courses were offered per college or school, and the mean number of categories of courses offered was 24. An average of 3 required APPEs was offered within 24 categories. Pharmacy programs varied in the number of and requirements for elective courses. Most elective courses expanded on what was taught in the required curriculum vs informing on unique concepts or skills.

Planning a Pharmacy-Led Medical Mission Trip, Part 3: Development and Implementation of an Elective Medical Missions Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) Rotation

With an increasing number of new pharmacy schools/colleges and expansion of existing ones, pharmacy schools/colleges are often in need of elective rotation experiences as part of the final year advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) program. Offering a medical missions elective APPE in either a domestic or international setting is a unique opportunity to expose pharmacy students to direct patient care. APPE students can be involved in triaging patients, compounding and dispensing medications, and providing patient education. As part of this APPE, pharmacy students are expected to complete projects such as formulary development, case presentations, book club discussions, journal reflections, manuscript preparations, and trip logistics planning. An elective APPE focused on medical missions facilitates the learning process and promotes the emergence of team leaders and leadership skills in general.

Medication Therapy Management Services Provided by Student Pharmacists

To evaluate the impact of student pharmacists delivering medication therapy management (MTM) services during an elective advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE). Student pharmacists provided MTM services at community pharmacy APPE sites, documented their recommendations, and then made follow-up telephone calls to patients to determine the impact of the MTM provided. Students were surveyed about the MTM experience. Forty-seven students provided MTM services to 509 patients over 2 years and identified 704 drug-related problems (average of 1.4 problems per patient). About 53% of patients relayed the recommendations to their physician and 205 (75%) physicians accepted the recommendations. Eighty-eight percent of patients reported feeling better about their medications after receiving MTM services. A majority of the students perceived their provision of MTM services as valuable to their patients. Providing MTM services to patients in a pharmacy practice setting allowed student pharmacists to apply skills learned in the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.