Elbasvir/grazoprevir Research Articles

An observational, prospective, multicenter study on the utilization and effectiveness of elbasvir-grazoprevir treatment association for chronic hepatitis C in France (ZEPHYR study).

The efficacy and safety profiles of elbasvir-grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) has been established in more than 10 clinical trials. However, the characteristics of patients treated in routine clinical practice may differ. The present study was therefore designed to assess the real-life effectiveness of EBR/GZR therapy in the general population and among subgroups with a high hepatitis C virus(HCV) prevalence in France. The Zephyr study was designed as a French, multicentre, prospective, observational study on EBR/GZR use and effectiveness in current practice in chronic hepatitis Cpatients. These results are based on data regardingthe adult patients who received at least one dose of EBR/GZR between December 2017 and June 2019 in 67 French hospitals and clinics. Overall, 478 patients were included. The Full Analysis Setcorresponded to the 467 patients who met all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. Gender was balanced and the mean age was 55.7 ± 13.3 years. The patients were mainly treatment-naive (89.5%) and infected with Genotype 1b (70.4%). Among the 75 patients with HCV Gt1a genotype, 56% had HCV RNA ≥ 800,000 IU/ml. F3-F4 fibrosis stage involved 24.2% of our population. Our subgroups were distributed among 110 migrants (23.6%), 58 (15.3%) using opioid agonist treatment, including people who inject drugs, 30 (6.8%) with chronic kidney disease Stages 3-5, 9 (1.9%) with aninherited blood disorder, and 4 (0.9%) coinfected with HIV. The remaining 269 (58.7%) were included in the general population subgroup. Overall, sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment reached 98.0% and remained consistent among genotype, HCV RNA values, fibrosis stage, and the subgroup of interest. The rate of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption​​​and Life Habit questionnaire completion was high at each visit, with data suggesting alcohol consumption decrease and an improvement in quality of life. Using real-world evidence data on a French population representative of HCV patients, we confirmed the results obtained during EBR/GZR development program.

High real-world effectiveness of 12-week elbasvir/grazoprevir without resistance testing in the treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1a infection in Norway

Background and aims The recommended treatment duration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a (GT1a) infection with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in the presence of a high baseline viral load and resistance associated substitutions (RAS) is 16 weeks with ribavirin added. The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and regardless of baseline viral load and RAS testing. Method This retrospective, observational cohort study was performed at five Norwegian hospitals that did not systematically utilize RAS testing. All adult patients with chronic HCV GT1a and compensated liver disease who had received 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without ribavirin and baseline RAS testing, were included. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12), or if not available, at week 4 (SVR4). Results We included 433 patients and attained SVR data on 388. The mean age was 45.7 years (22–73 years). 67.2% were male. HIV co-infection was present in 3.8% (16/424) and cirrhosis in 4% (17/424). The viral load was >800 000 IU/mL in 55.0% (235/427) of patients. Overall SVR was achieved in 97.2% (377/388). SVR was achieved in 98.3% (169/172) of those with viral load ≤800 000 IU/mL and in 96.2% (202/210) of those with viral load >800 000 IU/mL. Conclusion We observed high SVR rates among patients with HCV GT1a infection treated with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks without ribavirin, with no regard to baseline viral load and no RAS testing.

Sustainable and equivalent improvements in symptoms and functional well-being following viral cure from ledipasvir/sofosbuvir versus elbasvir/grazoprevir for chronic hepatitis Cinfection: Findings from the randomized PRIORITIZE trial.

The PRIORITIZE trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02786537) was the first comparative effectiveness study to directly compare ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A secondary aim of this study was to compare LDV/SOF and EBR/GZR on sustainable changes in several HCV-associated symptoms and functional well-being in patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). PRIORITIZE, a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2016 and 2020, evaluated change in six PROMIS® symptom scores (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive disturbance, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain) and functional well-being using the disease-specific HCV-PRO instrument. Survey assessments were administered at baseline, early post-treatment (median=6months) and late post-treatment (median=21 months). Constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate within-treatment change and between-treatment differences. Data from 793 participants (average 55 years old, 57% male, 44% black, 17% with cirrhosis) were analysed. From baseline to early post-treatment, 5 out of 6 symptoms and functional well-being significantly improved (all p's < .05). In the LDV/SOF arm, mean changes ranged from -3.73 for nausea to -6.41 for fatigue and in the EBR/GZR, mean changes ranged from -2.19 for cognitive impairment to -4.67 for fatigue. Change of >3 points was consider clinically meaningful. Improvements in most symptoms slightly favoured LDV/SOF, although the magnitude of differences between the regimens were small. Both regimens demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms and functional well-being that were sustained during the late post-treatment phase. EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF regimens had clinically equivalent and durable improvements in HCV symptoms and functional well-being up to two years after SVR.

Geographic Distribution of HCV Genotypes and Efficacy of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Chronic HCV-Infected Patients in North and Northeast China: A Real-World Multicenter Study.

Objective To assess the geographic distribution of HCV genotypes, effectiveness, and safety of DAA treatment for HCV-infected patients in North and Northeast China. Methods The geographic distribution of HCV genotypes was analyzed in 2162 patients recruited from April 2018 to February 2021. Sustained virologic response rates at 12 (SVR12) or 24 (SVR24) weeks posttreatment and safety were analyzed in 405 patients who completed DAA treatment according to patient baseline characteristics and treatment. Results Four genotypes and six subtypes were identified as follows: 1b (1187, 54.90%), 2a (790, 36.54%), 3a/b (134, 6.20%), 6a/n (44, 2.04%), mixed genotypes (2a-6a or 2a-3a) (7, 0.32%). Overall, 99.01% patients achieved SVR12, while 98.43% achieved SVR24. All patients treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin (SOF/VEL ± RBV), and SOF/ledipasvir (LDV) achieved SVR12 or SVR24; 92.86% SVR12 and 95.83% SVR24 were observed in patients using SOF + RBV. SVR12 was higher in noncirrhosis versus compensated cirrhosis patients (100% vs. 97.09%, p=0.022). No severe drug-related adverse event was observed. Conclusions Genotypes 1b and 2a were dominant subtypes in North and Northeast China. The approved drug regimens EBR/GZR and SOF/LDV for subtype 1b and SOF/VEL for nongenotype 1b are the optimal effective and safety profile.

A Retrospective Cohort Study: Safety and Effectiveness of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir ± Ribavirin Compared With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir/Dasabuvir ± Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection.

Background: The direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents are widely used to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 infection, while it may cause severe liver damage. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and recurrence rates in HCV GT 1 infection.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study that included patients diagnosed with HCV GT 1 infection, who had received intervention and treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) ± ribavirin (RBV) versus ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) + dasabuvir ± RBV (as control group) for 12 or 24 weeks at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between April 2016 and August 2018. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of DILI via Poisson regression, and the secondary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of two treatment regimens expressed as a percentage.Results: The study included 149 patients in the control group and 105 patients in the intervention group of which 99.33 and 98.1% patients, respectively, achieved SVR12. In the control group, one patient experienced relapse, whereas in the intervention group, two patients relapsed. Furthermore, in the control group, a total of nine patients developed DILI as determined during follow-up care. Of these patients, three were 55–84 years old. In the intervention group, six patients developed DILI. The IRR of DILI caused by EBR/GZR treatment was 2.84 times higher than that caused by the OBV/PTV/r treatment regimen.Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the studied DAA regimens regarding the incidence of DILI and effectiveness during the treatment. DILI occurrence during therapy did not affect the cure rate of medication. The present study results can provide reference data for drug selection among patients with HCV.Trial registration: The study was approved by DMF-CYCH (CYCH IRB No: 2018067).

Elbasvir/Grazoprevir Treatment in a Hemodialysis Patient with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2a Infection, not Responded to Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Combination Therapy

Since 2017, direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are the first-line treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In hemodialysis (HD) patients, however, a small percentage of patients failed to respond, and the data for the treatment of DAAs for such patients with HCV are lacking. Herein, we report a 57-year-old Libyan female patient on regular HD therapy for 18 years who did not achieved HCV clearance 12 weeks after the treatment with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. Later, she was treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for 12 weeks and achieved a sustained virological response at the end of the treatment (12 weeks) and 12 months after the end of the treatment. No obvious side effects were reported during the treatment. Thus, EBR/GZR was effective and safe in this hemodialyzed patient with HCV genotype 2b infection who was failed to respond to12 week-treatment with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir combination.

Impact of recent drug use on the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir for HCV-infected people on opioid agonist therapy.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) use in drug users on opiate agonist therapy (OAT) is supported by the C-EDGE Co-STAR trial. SVR rates in this study were within those found in the rest of patients included by the EBR/GZR development programme. In clinical practice, however, efficacy could theoretically be lower. Thus, we aimed at evaluating the SVR rates of EBR/GZR among people who injected drugs (PWID) with and without OAT in clinical practice. Patients starting EBR/GZR included in the HEPAVIR-DAA (NCT02057003), recruiting HIV/HCV-coinfected patients or the GEHEP-MONO (NCT02333292), including HCV-monoinfected individuals, prospective cohorts were analysed. Overall SVR12 (ITT), discontinuations due to adverse effects and drop-outs were evaluated. The same analysis was carried out for PWID with and without OAT. 336 patients had started EBR/GZR and reached the SVR12 evaluation date. 318 [95%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 92%-98%] patients achieved SVR12. SVR12 was 97% (95% CI: 93%-99%, n/N=141/145) among people who never used injecting drugs, 94% (95% CI: 88%-97%, n/N=117/125) among PWIDs without OAT and 91% (95% CI: 81%-97%, n/N=60/66) among PWIDs with OAT (p=0.134). Five (1.5%) patients showed relapses, and two (0.6%) individuals showed viral breakthrough. The SVR12 rate for recent drug users was 69% (n/N=18/26) compared with 97% (n/N=276/284) for individuals without recent drug use (in the prior year) (p<0.001). Among recent drug users, three (12%) showed relapses, and five (19%) were lost-to-follow-up. The SVR rates achieved with EBR/GZR were high in real-world conditions of use. However, PWID with recent drug use reach suboptimal response rates with EBR/GZR.

Elbasvir and grazoprevir for the treatment of hepatitis C

ABSTRACT Introduction: Hepatitis C is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease. The direct-acting-antivirals has revolutionized the chronic hepatitis C treatment. DAAs can achieve a sustained virological response rate >95% in different populations. Area covered: This review summarizes the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR). Expert opinion: EBR/GZR is a combination of NS5A and NS3/4A inhibitors. The performance in the EBR/GZR combination’s safety and tolerability is appreciated in clinical treatment. EBR/GZR also has a higher barrier to resistance-associated substitutions. Based on clinical trials and real-world experience, elbasvir/grazoprevir is effective in the HCV GT1, 4 infections.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals for Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C.

All oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have shown excellent efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). However, the cost of DAAs used to be expensive; therefore, large numbers of patients had no access to DAAs in China. Recently, prices have been greatly reduced. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) in Chinese CHC patients stratified by hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT), cirrhosis status, and treatment history. On the basis of a Chinese healthcare perspective, a Markov model was constructed to estimate the lifetime costs and health outcomes of patients treated with different DAA regimens. Chinese-specific clinical, cost, and utility inputs were obtained or calculated from published sources and expert opinions. Costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were reported as primary outcomes. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. At a willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$30,081/QALY (calculated by three times the GDP per capita in China), SOF/VEL was cost-effective in patients with HCV GT 1, 3, and 6 infections, and the probabilities that SOF/VEL was cost-effective were 9.7-75.7%, 39.1-63.9%, and 35.6-88.0%, respectively. For GT2 patients, noncirrhotic patients, treatment-naïve patients, and treatment-experienced patients, LDV/SOF was the most cost-effective regimen, and the probabilities of cost-effectiveness for each of these groups was 92.1-99.8%, 89.9-99.0%, 61.6-91.2%, and 99.3-100.0%, respectively below the WTP threshold. The GLE/PIB regimen (12-week duration) was the most cost-effective in cirrhotic patients, whereas the probability of its cost-effectiveness varied with that of EBR/GZR (4.1-93.8% versus 6.2-93.3%) below the WTP threshold. Overall, SOF/VEL and LDV/SOF regimens are more likely to be cost-effective among various subgroups of Chinese patients with CHC.

Safety and tolerability of elbasvir/grazoprevir in chronic hepatitis C virus therapy: Integrated analysis from clinical trials.

Direct-acting antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are generally safe; however, understanding the safety profile of each regimen is essential for their continued use. Safety data were pooled from 12 clinical trials of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) that enrolled adult participants with HCV infection. Pooled analyses are presented for participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12weeks and those receiving EBR/GZR plus ribavirin (RBV) for 16-18weeks. Safety data are also presented for participants with comorbidities receiving EBR/GZR for 12weeks in individual clinical trials (chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage 4/5, inherited blood disorders [IBLD] or receiving opioid agonist therapy [OAT]). Among 1743 participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12weeks, 1068 (61.3%) reported≥1 adverse event (AE) and 491 had AEs (28.2%) considered drug-related. The most frequent AEs were headache (10.6%), fatigue (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (5.8%), nausea (5.1%) and diarrhoea (5.0%). Serious AEs were reported by 37 participants (2.1%), and 12 (0.7%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. In populations with CKD 4/5 or IBLD or receiving OAT, safety was similar in participants receiving EBR/GZR for 12weeks and those receiving placebo. Some AEs occurred at higher frequencies in participants receiving RBV compared with those receiving EBR/GZR alone: fatigue (32.7% vs 8.7%); headache (21.6% vs 10.6%); and nausea (15.8% vs 5.1%). Safety was similar in participants with and those without cirrhosis. Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported in 0.7% participants. EBR/GZR is a safe treatment option for individuals with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or GT4 infections, even those with challenging comorbidities such as CKD or IBLD and those receiving OAT.

The Z-Profile Study: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study toassess the real-world use and effectiveness of elbasvir/grazoprevir in Canadian adult patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Canada was the first country to approve elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic HCV infection for genotypes 1 and 4 with or without ribavirin and genotype 3 with sofosbuvir, with no recommendation for baseline resistance testing. The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of EBR/GZR and the profile of patients selected for treatment in a Canadian real-world setting. This multicenter retrospective study of HCV-infected patients treated with EBR/GZR took place among selected Canadian health care providers, with no exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measures included parameters associated with patient profile and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) and 24 weeks after treatment. A total of 408 patients were included; 244 had available SVR12 information (per-protocol population [PP]). Genotype distribution included 1a (54.7%), 1b (17.2%), 3(11.8%), 4 (10.0%), and other (6.4%). The majority (88.7%) of participants were treated for 12 weeks without ribavirin. Fifty-nine (14.5%) participants, predominantly with genotype 1a (49/59) infection, were tested for baseline resistance-associated substitutions (bRAS). SVR12 was achieved by 95.9% of the PP. In an exploratory analysis assessing potential predictors of SVR12, participants who had undergone bRAS testing (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64) and participants who had undergone liver transplant (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.68) had significantly lower odds of achieving SVR12. This study supports the real-world effectiveness of EBR/GZR-including a broad range of genotypes and diverse fibrosis stages-in the absence of bRAS testing and in special populations.

Cost–utility of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir versus other direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1b infection in China

ObjectiveThis study aimed to estimate the cost–utility of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) compared with other direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in Chinese patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV).DesignA Markov model was developed to estimate...

Treatment outcomes in hepatitis C virus genotype 1a infected patients with and without baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions.

The presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) reduced sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a infected patients treated with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir (EBR/GZR). This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of NS5A RASs and treatment outcomes in patients for whom EBR/GZR was intended. We sequenced NS5A in 832 samples from German genotype1a-infected DAA-naïve patients population-based, which were collected in the European Resistance Database. Treatment outcomes and clinical parameters were evaluated in 519 of these patients retrospectively. Overall, 6.5% of patients harbored EBR-specific NS5A RASs at baseline, including Q30H/R (3.3%), L31M (1.8%), Y93H (1.6%) and other individual variants. Antiviral treatment, including EBR/GZR, was initiated in 88% of patients. In the absence of RASs, the majority of patients received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (57%) and the SVR rate was 97% compared to 99% SVR achieved using other DAA regimens (LDV/SOF±RBV, G/P, PrOD+RBV, VEL/SOF). Various regimens were used in the presence of RASs and SVR rates were high following treatment with LDV/SOF (100%), G/P (83%), PrOD/RBV (100%), VEL/SOF (100%), SMV/SOF (100%) and EBR/GZR+RBV for 16 weeks (100%). However, two patients received EBR/GZR for 16 weeks without RBV and one relapsed. EBR/GZR treatment with or without RBV for 12 or 16 weeks according to a baseline RAS analysis was highly effective with ≥97% SVR in patients with genotype 1a. EBR/GZR without RBV should be avoided in patients with RASs. High SVR rates were also achieved using other 8 or 12 weeks DAA regimens.

Efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir in treatment-naive Chinese adults with hepatitis C virus infection: A randomized trial.

Background and AimIn China, clinical experience with direct‐acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is still emerging. C‐CORAL is a phase 3, multinational, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in participants with HCV infection from the Asia‐Pacific region and Russia. Here, we report the data from participants enrolled in China.MethodsTreatment‐naive participants with chronic HCV genotype (GT) 1, GT4, or GT6 infection were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg EBR/100 mg GZR for 12 weeks (immediate‐treatment group, ITG) or placebo followed by deferred treatment with EBR/GZR (deferred‐treatment group, DTG). The primary efficacy end‐point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after completing treatment (SVR12), and the primary safety end‐point was a comparison of safety between participants receiving EBR/GZR and placebo (NCT02251990; Protocol PN‐5172‐067).ResultsA total of 152 participants in China were randomly assigned (ITG, n = 115; DTG, n = 37). SVR12 was achieved in 96.7% (146/151) participants overall and in 97.3% (142/146) of those with GT1b infection. Four participants relapsed (GT1b, n = 3; GT6a, n = 1). Drug‐related AEs were reported in 25 (21.7%) and 9 (24.3%) participants receiving EBR/GZR and placebo, respectively; no drug‐related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. Two (1.7%) participants receiving EBR/GZR had late hepatic transaminase elevations. Patient‐reported outcomes indicate improved quality of life at follow‐up week 4 in participants receiving EBR/GZR compared to placebo.ConclusionEBR/GZR administered for 12 weeks represents a highly effective and safe treatment option for Chinese individuals with HCV GT1 infection.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b East-Asian patients receiving hemodialysis

Data regarding the efficacy and tolerability of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for East-Asian hepatitis C virus genotype 1b (HCV GT1b) patients receiving hemodialysis were limited. We prospectively recruited 40 HCV GT1b hemodialysis patients who received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks at 6 academic centers in Taiwan. The efficacy endpoints were sustained virologic response 12 weeks off-therapy (SVR12) by intention-to-treat (ITT) modified ITT (mITT) analyses. Patients’ baseline characteristics, early viral kinetics and HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at HCV non-structural 3 and 5 A (NS3 and NS5A) regions potentially affecting SVR12 were analyzed. The tolerability for EBR/GZR was also assessed. The SVR12 rates by ITT and mITT analyses were 95% (38 of 40 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 83.5–98.6%) and 100% (38 of 38 patients; 95% CI: 90.8–100%), respectively. Patients’ baseline characteristics, on-treatment viral decline, and baseline HCV RASs did not affect SVR12. All patients tolerated treatment well. Among 5 patients who had serious adverse events (AEs) including one death due to on-treatment suicide and the other death due to off-therapy acute myocardial infarction, none of these events were judged related to EBR/GZR. The common AEs included upper respiratory tract infection (7.5%), fatigue (5.0%) and anorexia (5.0%). Nine (22.5%) and 8 (20.0%) patients had on-treatment hemoglobin levels of 9.0–10.0 g/dL and 7.0–9.0 g/dL. Three (7.5%) patients had on-treatment elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) quotient > 2.5, in whom one (2.5%) had EBR/GZR-induced late ALT elevation. No patients developed hyperbilirubinemia or hepatic decompensation. In conclusion, treatment with EBR/GZR is effective and well-tolerated for East-Asian HCV GT1b patients receiving hemodialysis.

Elbasvir/grazoprevir is effective and tolerable for the treatment of HCV GT1-infected patients: A real world multicenter observatory study in Taiwan.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) was found to be efficacious and well tolerated in clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of EBR/GZR in the treatment of HCV genotype 1-infected Taiwanese patients. Chronic hepatitis C patients infected with GT1b or 1a without resistance-associated substitution, and treated with 12-week EBR/GZR were enrolled from 10 hospitals in Taiwan between August 2017 and December 2018. All clinical and virologic data were collected at each participating center. Primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) after end of the EBR/GZR therapy, assessed in the per-protocol population, which excluded patients with important deviations from the protocol. Analysis was also performed based on the modified full analysis set, which included all allocated patients receiving at least 4-week medication. Virologic failure was recorded as breakthrough, nonresponse, or relapse. Safety was assessed through collection of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs, and standard laboratory evaluations. Per protocol SVR12 rates were 99.5% (1169/1175) for all HCV genotype 1 patients. Among patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney diseases, 100% (107/107) achieved SVR12. In univariate analyses, variables associated with SVR12 were treatment termination (P<0.0001) and treatment adherence (P<0.0001) in the mFAS population. Overall, 22.3% of the patients experienced adverse events during treatment. Seven patients did not complete the treatment, five due to liver-unrelated deaths, one due to adverse event and one due to epilepsy. EBR/GZR treatment was highly effective and well tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Real-World Single-Center Experience in Tianjin, China.

ObjectiveToward the limited real-world data concerning the treatment response to brand direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) therapy, we proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAAs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in mainland China.MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, all HCV-infected adult patients treated with brand DAA drugs covered by Tianjin local health insurance (Apr 2018–Sept 2019) and responding to other specific inclusion criteria were recruited. The five available DAA regimens included sofosbuvir + ribavirin (SOF + RBV), elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r/DSV) ± RBV, daclatasvir + asunaprevir (DCV + ASV), and SOF + DCV ± RBV. Demographic, virologic, clinical, and adverse effects data obtained during and after DAAs treatment were collected. We evaluated the rate of sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12), the incidence of adverse effects, and assessed the factors associated with SVR12.ResultsFour hundred ninety-four patients finished the treatment and completed the 12-week post-treatment follow-up. The overall SVR12 rate was estimated at 96.96%. SVR rates greater than 95% were achieved in most of the HCV genotypes with the exception of GT1a (0%), GT3a (93.33%), and GT3b (88.24%). SVR12 for patients treated with DCV + ASV, EBR/GZR, OBV/PTV/r/DSV ± RBV, SOF + DCV ± RBV, and SOF + RBV for 12 or 24 weeks was 86.67%, 100%, 98.11%, 97.56%, and 95.06%, respectively. Subjects with compensated cirrhosis (92.73%) and prior treatment experience (77.78%) had significantly lower SVR rates when compared to chronic hepatitis C (98.15%) and treatment-naive (97.69%) groups. In Tianjin, the available DAA regimens were generally well-tolerated, and not a single serious adverse event was reported.ConclusionIn this large real-life single-center HCV cohort from China, oral DAAs were highly effective and well-tolerated. Further and larger-scale studies are needed to evaluate their clinical safety and efficacy.

The efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir treatment in HCV genotype 1 patients in Taiwan.

BackgroundElbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) is a new generation, fixed‐dose, combination antiviral drug used in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 1 or 4 infection. Our study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of EBR/GZR after its launch in Taiwan.MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study. Patients who had received EBR/GZR for chronic HCV GT 1 between June 2017 and April 2018 were recruited. Patients’ age, sex, HCV GT, changes in HCV RNA level before and after treatment, sustained virologic response 12 weeks (SVR12) after the cessation of drug administration, side effects, and interaction effects were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety.ResultsA total of 149 patients were recruited. Of them, 145 (97.3%) had HCV GT 1b, and the rest had HCV GT 1a; most of the EBR/GZR‐related side effects in this study were mild. Three participants were discontinued because their alanine transaminase levels were elevated to over 10 times the upper limit of normal. The therapeutic effect analyses revealed a rapid virologic response rate of 95.3% and an SVR12 rate of 98%. Subgroup analyses performed using SVR12 as the outcome variable revealed three demographic factors HCV GT 1, hepatocellular carcinoma medical history, and noncirrhosis plus HCV RNA level.ConclusionsThis study confirmed that EBR/GZR is safe and effective for treating patients with HCV GT 1 and exhibited excellent overall clinical efficacy in Taiwan. The therapeutic effects are unrelated to factors such as sex, HCV RNA level before treatment, and history of liver cirrhosis.

Limited drug–drug interaction of elbasvir/grazoprevir for chronic hepatitis C

The assessment of drug-drug interaction (DDI) is important not only for safety but also for maintaining the efficacy of direct acting antivirals in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). This study aims to evaluate DDI before and during elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) treatment. CHC patients who treated with EBR/GZR in five hospitals were enrolled. The patients' demographic data, comorbidities, concomitant medications taken before and during EBR/GZR were recorded. DDI was evaluated using a tool from the HEP Drug Interactions (www.hep-druginteractions.org) website. In addition to the evaluation of DDI for EBR/GZR, the virtual DDI of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) were evaluated. Degrees of DDI were classified as "do not co-administer", "potential interaction", and "potentially weak interaction". A total of 460 patients were enrolled. At baseline, 80.1% of patients had one or more comorbidities and 72.8% took one or more medications. Cardiovascular diseases (43.9%), gastrointestinal diseases (37.4%), and metabolic diseases (36.7%) were the three most common comorbidities. The prevalence of DDI before EBR/GZR treatment was 12.8% (59 patients). Among the same population, the prevalence of virtual DDI of SOF/VEL, GLE/PIB, and LDV/SOF were 38.5% (179 patients), 48.8% (220 patients), and 57.0% (262 patients), respectively. During EBR/GZR treatment, 167 patients (36.3%) took newly prescribed medications. One patient (0.2%) and seven patients (1/5%) exhibited do-not-co-administer and potential interaction with EBR/GZR, respectively. DDI was limited in treatment with EBR/GZR. DDI can occur upon the administering of a new medication during antiviral treatment and attention should be paid to it. NCT03706222.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Fixed-Dose Combinations of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine and Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in Healthy Adult Participants.

Treatment of individuals coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) requires careful consideration of potential drug-drug interactions. The pharmacokinetic interaction of the HCV fixed-dose combination treatment of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) when coadministered with the fixed-dose combination HIV treatment of elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (EVG/COB/TDF/FTC) was evaluated in 22 healthy adults. In period 1, oral doses of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC (150mg/150mg/300mg/200mg) were administered once daily for 7 days. In period 2, oral doses of EBR/GZR (50mg/100mg) were administered once daily for 10 days. In period 3, oral doses of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were coadministered with EBR/GZR once daily for 10 days. The pharmacokinetics of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were not clinically meaningfully altered by concomitant EBR/GZR administration. Geometric mean ratios (90%CIs) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24 ) in the presence/absence of EBR/GZR were 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) for elvitegravir; 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) for emtricitabine; 1.2 (1.1, 1.2) for tenofovir; and 1.5 (1.4, 1.6) for cobicistat. In comparison, the AUC0-24 of elbasvir was ∼2 times higher and the AUC0-24 of grazoprevir was ∼5 times higher following concomitant administration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR. Geometric mean ratios (90%CI) for AUC0-24 in the presence/absence of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC were 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for elbasvir and 5.4 (4.5, 6.4) for grazoprevir. Coadministration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR was generally well tolerated in healthy adults in this study. Nevertheless, because of the increased GZR exposure that occurs with coadministration of EVG/COB/TDF/FTC and EBR/GZR, coadministration of this combination is not recommended in those coinfected with HIV and HCV.