EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

EGFR-TKIs or EGFR-TKIs combination treatments for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a network meta-analysis

Abstract Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and EGFR-TKI combination treatments have become the standard first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the best option has yet to be determined. This study compares the efficacy and safety of various first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapies and combination treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials databases, and several international conferences to identify randomized controlled trials reporting on first-line EGFR-TKI treatments for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The study quality was assessed using the revised tool for risk of bias in randomized trials. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the included treatments were compared by network meta-analysis based on a frequentist approach. Results We identified 26 trials (8,359 patients) investigating 14 treatment groups, including first, second, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs and their combination treatments. Osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab showed the highest efficacy in improving progression-free survival. New third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated comparable efficacy to osimertinib alone but did not surpass it. Subgroup analyses revealed slight variation in treatment efficacy based on mutation types and patient demographics. Combination treatments were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. Conclusion These results reveal that osimertinib plus chemotherapy and lazertinib plus amivantamab are superior first-line options for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, these combinations are associated with higher adverse event rates.

In brief: A new non-small cell lung cancer indication for osimertinib (Tagrisso).

The oral kinase inhibitor osimertinib (Tagrisso – AstraZeneca), which has been available for years for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adults with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, has now been approved for treatment of unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC.1 About 20-30% of patients with NSCLC have locally advanced stage III NSCLC, and 60-90% of these patients have unresectable disease. Osimertinib is the first targeted therapy to be approved for the new indication.

Loss of CDKN2A Enhances the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a common driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While mutant EGFR has been reported to limit the efficacy of immunotherapy, a subset of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. A better understanding of how co-occurring genomic alterations in oncogenic driver genes impact immunotherapy efficacy may provide a more complete understanding of cancer heterogeneity and identify biomarkers of response. Here, we investigated the effects of frequent EGFR co-mutations in EGFR mutant lung cancer models and identified loss-of-function mutation of CDKN2A as a potential sensitizer to anti-PD-1 treatment in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, CDKN2A loss impacted the composition of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) by promoting the expression of PD-L2 through reduced ubiquitination of c-Myc, and mutant EGFR cooperated to upregulate c-Myc and PD-L2 by activating the MAPK pathway. Blocking PD-L2 induced anti-tumor immune responses mediated by CD8+ T cells in EGFR/CDKN2A co-mutated lung cancer. Importantly, a small-molecule PD-L2 inhibitor, zinc undecylenate, remodeled the TIME of EGFR/CDKN2A co-mutant tumors and enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Collectively, these results identify EGFR/CDKN2A co-mutation as a distinct subtype of NSCLC that shows superior sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade and reveals a potential combined therapeutic strategy for treating this NSCLC subtype.

Efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in treating advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: Up to May 26, 2024, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, China Science and Technology Journal, and Wanfang were searched, and the randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed the quality of the included literature, and extracted the literature data. Revman5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 824 patients were included in 10 RCTs. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group (osimertinib alone), the experimental group (osimertinib plus bevacizumab) had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (relative risk [RR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–1.47, P = .02), and the experimental group could significantly reduce the expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (mean difference [SMD] = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.30–1.35, P = .002), vascular endothelial growth factor (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.13–0.73, P = .005), neuron-specific enolase (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.60–1.17, P < .00001), cytokeratin 19 fragments (SMD = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.34–2.33, P = .009), and carbohydrate antigen 125 (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.15–0.77, P = .004) in serum. However, the experimental group did not significantly improve the disease control rate (DCR) (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00–1.36, P = .05), 1- and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00–1.33, P = .05; RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.74–1.40, P = .92), 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.92–1.36, P = .28; RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.84–1.18, P = .95). Interestingly, the results of subgroup analysis showed that the experimental group significantly improved ORR, DCR, 1-year PFS, and OS rates in the Chinese population and patients under 65 years old (P < .05). In addition, when the dose of bevacizumab was 7.5 mg/kg q3w in the experimental group, ORR, DCR, 1-year PFS, and OS rates were significantly better than those in the control group (P < .05). In terms of adverse events of drugs, the incidence of proteinuria, hypertension, oral mucositis, bleeding, nausea, and vomiting in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group (P < .05). Conclusion: For patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, osimertinib plus bevacizumab has some clinical benefit compared with osimertinib alone. Still, it does not provide additional long-term survival benefits and has higher toxicity. More well-designed, multicenter RCTs are needed to identify the subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from this combination regimen and to validate the optimal dose of this combination regimen.

Afatinib and Necitumumab in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

IntroductionAlthough tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations, acquired resistance is inevitable. Preclinical studies suggest combining EGFR TKI and monoclonal antibody therapies may have activity in EGFR-mutated NSCLC that has progressed on TKI therapy alone. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated afatinib plus necitumumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. MethodsThis was a phase I dose-escalation, dose-expansion trial assessing the safety and efficacy of afatinib plus necitumumab. Patients had advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC with progression after: (1) first-generation TKI if T790M-negative; (2) subsequent line third-generation TKI if T790M-positive; or (3) third-generation TKI in the first-line setting. Dose-escalation followed a 3+3 design. The primary endpoint of dose-expansion was objective response rate (ORR). ResultsA total of 22 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was afatinib 40 mg oral daily plus necitumumab 600 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. There were no Grade 4-5 adverse events observed, and seven patients (32%) experienced Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (3 rash; 1 each oral mucositis, diarrhea, headache, and ventricular arrhythmia and tachycardia). In the entire cohort, there were no responses observed, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 36% but varied between subgroups. ConclusionsAfatinib plus necitumumab was safe but showed limited activity in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Biomarker studies may identify patient subgroups that are more likely to benefit.

Osimertinib in Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Impact on Survival, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes

Osimertinib in Early-Stage EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Impact on Survival, Safety, and Clinical Outcomes

Therapeutic strategies to overcome ALK-fusion and BRAF-mutation as acquired resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: two case reports

Therapeutic strategies to overcome ALK-fusion and BRAF-mutation as acquired resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: two case reports

Changing Treatment and Metastatic Disease Patterns in Patients with EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ATOMIC Registry Analysis

IntroductionOsimertinib is now a standard 1L therapy for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to characterize patterns of therapy and longitudinal risk of brain and liver metastasis in a cohort of EGFRm NSCLC. MethodsPatients with metastatic EGFRm NSCLC who received 1L systemic therapy at sites within the Academic Thoracic Medical Investigator’s Consortium (ATOMIC) were included; demographic and clinical data including treatment patterns were described. Analyses of overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and incident brain and liver metastasis were performed on patients who started 1L therapy in ≥2015 using Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression, and cumulative incidence functions. ResultsThe full cohort included 1,132 patients; mean age 63.4 years, 53% White, 68% female, 67% nonsmoker; 830 patients received 1L systemic therapy in ≥2015. The predominant first EGFR-TKI was erlotinib (65%) prior to 2018 and osimertinib (81%) after 2018. The median TTNT after start of 1L therapy was 13.9 months overall, and longest in patients receiving 1L osimertinib (28 months). In the post 2015 cohort, the baseline prevalence of brain metastasis (BM) was 54% and among patients without baseline brain metastasis, the probability of incident BM at 12, 24, and 48 months was 8%, 22% and 44%, respectively. Development of an on-treatment brain metastasis among patients without baseline brain metastasis was associated with a 3.2 times higher risk of death. ConclusionEven in a contemporary era with prevalent osimertinib use, baseline and longitudinal risk of BM development was high. The ongoing risk of developing BM, together with the associated survival detriment, argues for routine surveillance brain MRIs for patients with EGFRm NSCLC, which are not currently included in guidelines.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer transformed into small-cell lung cancer after treatment

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations who developed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods: We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data for 21 patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC who developed SCLC transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment at Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2015 to December 2021. The clinical characteristics were summarized and the prognosis analysis was conducted. Patients were followed up until February 2024. The efficacy was evaluated using Solid Tumor Response Evaluation Criteria, and survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival time (OS) between limited stage and extensive stage in transformed SCLC patients. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the influencing factors of survival after SCLC transformation. Results: Among the 21 patients, there were 5 males and 16 females, with an age range of 33-74 years old [(58.9±2.6) years old]. All 21 patients were adenocarcinoma with sensitive EGFR mutations. There were 18 cases (85.7%) with EGFR gene 19del mutation, including 1 case of 19del+anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation, and 3 cases of L858R mutation. Among the transformed SCLC, there were 11 cases of pure SCLC and 10 cases of mixed SCLC (coexisting of adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma components). The median time from diagnosis of NSCLC to SCLC transformation was 12.0 months (95%CI: 7.6-16.3 months). Among the 21 cases of SCLC transformation, there were 13 cases with the extensive stage and 8 cases with the limited stage. Among them, 16 patients received systemic chemotherapy based on etoposide, of which 13 cases could be evaluated for efficacy, 11 cases could be calculated for PFS. Five cases had partial remission, 5 cases were stable, 3 cases had disease progression, and 3 cases cloud not be evaluated. The median progression free survival time (PFS) was 4.8 months (95%CI: 2.8-6.8 months). The median survival time (OS) after SCLC transformation in 21 patients was 10.6 months (95%CI: 7.0-14.2 months), with a median OS of 8.8 months (95%CI: 6.3-11.4 months) for patients with the extensive stage and 27.5 months (95%CI: 9.6-34.4 months) for patients with the limited stage, with statistically significant differences (P=0.002). Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that the limited stage after SCLC transformation was a protective factor for OS (HR=0.32, 95%CI: 0.12-0.73, P=0.010). The median OS of 21 patients from the diagnosis of lung cancer was 24.9 months (95%CI: 13.0-36.7 months). Conclusions: NSCLC patients with SCLC transformation are all adenocarcinomas, and the proportion of EGFR19del mutations is relatively high. After SCLC transformation, the standard chemotherapy regimen for SCLC is generally used for treatment. The OS after SCLC transformation is related to the stage, and the prognosis is better in the limited stage.

Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Egfr-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Osimertinib: Real-World Outcomes and Insights

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated superior efficacy over first-generation TKIs in the FLAURA trial, resulting in its approval as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of these trial results requires an evaluation of sequential therapeutic strategies. Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study utilized data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform, which includes information on patients treated for lung cancer since 2015. Out of 39,974 patients in the database, 624 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line (L1, n = 198) or second-line (L2, n = 426) treatment after first- or second-generation TKIs (n = 1262) were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, and disease progression were examined. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: In the study population (n = 624), 73.4% were female, with a median age of 70 years (range 28–93). Brain metastases at the start of osimertinib treatment were observed in 282 patients. ECOG PS-2 was reported in 29.4% of patients. The T790M mutation in exon 20 was identified in 257/426 patients (60.3%) receiving osimertinib in L2. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI [10.7–14.7]) for L1 and 7.4 months (95% CI [6.2–8.7]) for L2. Median overall survival (OS) from advanced diagnosis was 28.5 months (95% CI [26.3–38.7]) for osimertinib L1 and 29.9 months (95% CI [28.6–31.8]) for osimertinib L2 (HR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.75–1.16]; p = 0.50). For L1, median OS was 27.1 months (95% CI [22.0–30.2]) for patients with cerebral metastases and 38.7 months (95% CI [26.3–52.8]) for those without (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.48–1.11]; p = 0.15). Discussion: Patients in the real-world ESME database exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those in the FLAURA trial. The presence of cerebral metastases at diagnosis worsens the prognosis.

Sintilimab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 in EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC patients who progressed on EGFR TKI therapy: A China-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305, versus chemotherapy alone for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. 10-year Markov model was developed using a 21-day cycle length. Transition probabilities were derived from the ORIENT-31 trial, while cost and health state utilities were obtained from publicly databases, local hospitals, and published literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the primary model output and compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of $15,289.34 to $38,223.34 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. In the base-case analysis, sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy had an ICER of $53,266.32/QALYs, exceeding the upper WTP threshold. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy had an ICER of $15,329.11/QALY, slightly above the lower WTP threshold. Subgroup analysis yielded consistent results. Deterministic sensitivity analyses found no ICER for sintilimab plus chemotherapy beyond the upper WTP threshold. Most model input changes did not decrease the ICER of sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy below the upper WTP threshold. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses further demonstrated the cost-effectiveness superiority of sintilimab plus chemotherapy over sintilimab plus IBI305 and chemotherapy. This study supports the cost-effectiveness of using sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of combining sintilimab with IBI305 and chemotherapy in this particular patient group may be lacking.

Bioinformatics analysis of PSAT1 loss identifies downstream pathways regulated in EGFR mutant NSCLC and a selective gene signature for predicting the risk of relapse.

The majority of malignant tumors exhibit an altered metabolic phenotype that ultimately provides the required energy and molecular precursors necessary for unregulated cell division. Within this, phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 (PSAT1) is involved in de novo serine biosynthesis and its activity promotes various biochemical processes, including one-carbon metabolism. It also directly generates α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), a Kreb cycle intermediate and epigenetic-regulating metabolite. Prior studies examining PSAT1 depletion have identified individual affected downstream pathways, such as GSK3β and E2F, in several cancer types, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, global gene expression examination in response to PSAT1 loss, particularly in EGFR mutant NSCLC, has not been unexplored. Transcriptional profiling of EGFR mutant NSCLC cells with or without stable knock-down of PSAT1 identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) enriched in several metabolic pathways required for cell division, including amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis. Supplementation studies involving non-essential amino acids, nucleosides and α-KG partially restored defects in anchorage-independent growth due to the knockdown of PSAT1. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis identified potential impacts on actin cytoskeleton arrangement and β-catenin activity, which were rescued by PSAT1 re-expression. Finally, a comparative analysis of PSAT1 DEGs against transcripts enriched in patient EGFR mutant lung tumors identified a gene signature that is associated with overall and relapse-free survival (RFS) and was able to distinguish low or high-risk populations for RFS in early-stage EGFR mutant NSCLC. Overall, investigating genes altered by PSAT1 loss confirmed known PSAT1-regulated cellular pathways, identified a previously unknown role in the mediation of cytoskeleton arrangement in EGFR mutant NSCLC cells and allowed for the characterization of a gene signature with putative predictive potential for RFS in early-stage disease.

Optimal first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a comparative analysis of osimertinib and second-generation EGFR-TKIs

BackgroundOsimertinib is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is the preferred first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. However, limited research has compared its clinical effectiveness with second-generation (2nd G) EGFR-TKIs.Materials and methodsThis study recruited patients diagnosed with stage IIIb-IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received first-line treatment with either 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib and dacomitinib) or osimertinib between April 2020 and April 2023.ResultsThe final analysis included 168 patients, of whom 113 received 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (afatinib or dacomitinib) and 55 received osimertinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between 2nd G EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib (del 19: 17.6 months; L858R: 20.0 months vs. 28.3 months, p = 0.081). In patients with the EGFR exon 19 deletion, osimertinib conferred a longer median PFS (28.3 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.118) and time to treatment failure (30.2 vs. 22.7 months, p = 0.722) than 2nd G EGFR-TKIs. However, the differences were not statistically significant. In patients with with the EGFR exon 19 deletion and central nervous system metastasis, the median PFS did not differ significantly between those treated with osimertinib (14.3 months) and those treated with 2nd G EGFR-TKIs (17.6 months; p = 0.881). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the NSCLC stage was the only independent negative predictor of PFS. The treatment patterns in the second line also differed significantly between groups (p = 0.008).ConclusionsThis study found comparable effectiveness between osimertinib and 2nd G EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with only the NSCLC stage identified as a negative predictor of PFS. However, whether the different second-line treatments affect overall survival should be examined.

P1.03D.05 A Novel DNA Repair-Gene Model to Predict Responses to Immunotherapy and Prognosis in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

P1.03D.05 A Novel DNA Repair-Gene Model to Predict Responses to Immunotherapy and Prognosis in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Assessing platelet-lymphocyte ratio in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: An analysis across TKI generations.

Introduction : The prognostic utility of laboratory markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is an ongoing area of research. The utility of the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients treated with osimertinib is undetermined. Methods : 151 patients treated with EGFR TKIs in Los Angeles were grouped into one of two groups according to generation of TKI. Differences in progression free survival (PFS) by stratification by PLR was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences in median change in laboratory markers by generation of TKI was analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests. Cox Hazard Regression was used to perform multivariate analysis. Results : Median PFS of those managed with 1st or 2nd generation TKIs was significantly lower in patients with a PLR ≥ 180 (10.5 months) compared to those with PLR < 180 (16.6 months, p = 0.0163). Median PFS was comparable in those treated with osimertinib regardless of PLR. Patients managed with osimertinib had a significant decrease in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at 6 weeks and in platelets at 6 weeks and 3 months compared to those managed with 1st or 2nd generation TKIs. Discussion : The prognostic value of PLR was more apparent in patients treated with 1st or 2nd generation TKIs compared to those treated with osimertinib. Third generation EGFR TKIs may be more efficacious in treating patients with laboratory findings previously shown to predict poor survival. The significant changes in peripheral cell counts suggest variability tumor microenvironment changes dependent on the generation of TKI received.

A Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of Osimertinib With and Without Ramucirumab in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Naïve EGFR-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (RAMOSE trial).

Preclinical studies demonstrated that dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways delay the emergence of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and in trials with first-generation EGFR TKIs, the combination of EGFR VEGF pathway inhibitors prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). The RAMOSE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03909334, HCRN LUN-18-335) is a randomized, open-label multicenter phase II study comparing osimertinib with ramucirumab (arm A) to osimertinib (arm B) for initial treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 2:1 random assignment. The primary end point is PFS for evaluable patients; secondary end points include objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety. The stratification criteria were EGFR mutation type and the presence of CNS metastasis. At data cutoff on August 29, 2023, 160 patients consented, 147 patients received treatment, and 139 patients were evaluable with at least one scan. In this preplanned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 16.6 months. Among the evaluable patients, 57 PFS events occurred. The median PFS was 24.8 (A) versus 15.6 (B) months (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93]; log-rank P = .023), 12-month PFS rate was 76.7% (A) versus 61.9% (B; P = .026). No significant difference was observed in the ORRs and DCRs between arms. Any-grade (G) adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100% (A) and 98% (B) of patients, with no G5 treatment-related AE (TRAE), one G4 TRAE (hyponatremia, A), and 53% (A) versus 41% (B) G3 TRAEs. AE-related discontinuation occurred in 13 patients (9.7% in A and 8.7% in B). The safety profile was in line with known safety of each drug. Ramucirumab plus osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS compared with osimertinib alone in patients with TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The combination is safe and well tolerated.

Updated overall survival and ctDNA analysis in patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with lazertinib in the phase 1/2 LASER201 study.

Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with significant efficacy in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the final overall survival (OS) report from the phase 1/2 LASER201 study in patients with advanced NSCLC with disease progression on or after prior EGFR TKI therapy. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 20years, with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and previous therapy with EGFR TKI. Patients in this integrated analysis received oral lazertinib 240mg/day. Endpoints included efficacy and safety; exploratory analyses included associations between circulating EGFR-mutant tumor DNA (ctDNA) and efficacy parameters. This integrated analysis included 78 patients in Korea who received second- or later-line lazertinib. The median OS was 38.9months; estimated survival rates at 12, 24, and 36months were 89.5%, 73.9%, and 52.8%, respectively. The cumulative 12-month incidence of central nervous system progression was 9.4%. EGFR-mutant ctDNA was detected in 46 patients (62.2%) at baseline. The presence of ctDNA at baseline significantly predicted progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and OS. PFS, response rate, and DCR were significantly associated with EGFR-mutant ctDNA clearance at cycle 3; PFS and OS were significantly associated with ctDNA clearance at cycle 5. The safety profile of lazertinib 240mg/day was consistent with previous findings. Lazertinib is a promising treatment option for patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC following disease progression on prior EGFR-directed TKIs. Patients in LASER201 experienced prolonged OS, regardless of their EGFR mutation, brain metastases, or prior brain radiation status. Clearance of plasma EGFR mutations after lazertinib was associated with patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03046992.

Thoracic Radiotherapy Improves the Survival in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Oligo-Organ Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Phase III Trial.

This multicenter, randomized, phase III clinical trial (Northern Radiation Oncology Group of China-002) focused on patients with oligo-organ metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. We aimed to investigate whether first-line concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), compared with TKIs alone, could achieve better survival. The patients in the TKI plus TRT group received 60 Gy to primary lung tumor and positive regional lymph nodes. Radiotherapy for metastases to other sites was determined by clinicians. The primary end point was the progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The first and second interim analyses were performed in March 2021 and March 2022. Between April 14, 2016, and February 25, 2022, a total of 118 patients were enrolled. Compared with the TKI alone group, the TKI plus TRT group achieved significantly better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .004) and OS (HR, 0.62; P = .029). The median PFS was 10.6 months in the TKI alone group and 17.1 months in the TKI plus TRT group. The median OS was 26.2 months and 34.4 months in the TKI alone group and TKI plus TRT group, respectively. The TKI plus TRT group showed better local control but was associated with a higher incidence of severe TRAEs (11.9% v 5.1%). For patients with EGFR-mutated oligo-organ metastatic NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs, concurrent TRT improves the PFS and OS, and TRAEs are acceptable and tolerable.

Afatinib plus bevacizumab combination after osimertinib resistance in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Phase II ABCD-study

IntroductionMany clinical studies showed a synergy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. We hypothesized afatinib plus bevacizumab exerts clinical potency after developing various osimertinib resistant mechanisms. MethodsEGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled after osimertinib resistance. Afatinib at 30–40 mg/day and bevacizumab at 15 mg/kg tri-weekly were administered until progression. Plasma/histologic rebiopsied samples after osimertinib failure were analyzed to examine resistant mechanisms: gene alterations/copy-number gain using cancer personalized profiling by deep sequencing. ResultsBetween January 2018 and October 2020, 28 patients were enrolled. Response and disease control rates were 17.9 % and 78.6 %, respectively. Median duration of response was 9.0 (range, 4.2–22.3) months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 2.7 and 9.3 months, respectively. Twenty-eight (100 %) plasma and/or 21 (75 %) histologic rebiopsies identified: 17 (61 %) TP53; 15 (54 %) T790M; 9 (32 %) uncommon EGFR; 9 (32 %) MET; 6 (21 %) C797S; 3 (11 %) BRAF; 2 (7 %) HER2; 2 (7 %) KRAS; and 2 (7 %) PI3K mutations. One (17 %) of 6 C797S patients showed complete response. Three (33 %) of 9 uncommon EGFR-mutated patients achieved radiographic response. Neither 15 T790M-positive nor 6 EGFR downstream signaling mutations: BRAF; KRAS; or PI3K-positive patients responded, but 5 (38 %) of 13 T790M-negative patients responded. Adverse events ≥ grade 3 and incidence ≥ 5 % were: hypertension (29 %); proteinuria (7 %); and diarrhea (7 %). There were neither treatment-related death nor interstitial lung disease. ConclusionsSelected population could obtain clinical benefit from afatinib plus bevacizumab, based on rebiopsy results after osimertinib resistance.

Plasma EGFR mutation ctDNA dynamics in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with Icotinib: phase 2 multicenter trial result

Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics exhibit promise in predicting outcomes in patients with EGFRm-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains limited trial-level data on integrating ctDNA monitoring into clinical practice. We performed a prospective, multicenter trial to investigate the relationship between EGFRm ctDNA dynamic changes and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients with EGFRm. Ninety-eight treatment-naive EGFRm-advanced NSCLC patients were recruited and administered icotinib until disease progression. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and four weeks after icotinib administration. ctDNA was analyzed using a droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction. At baseline, 71.4% of patients had detectable EGFRm ctDNA. Among them, 45.9% of patients’ ctDNA became undetectable within four weeks of treatment. These patients demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with detectable ctDNA after treatment (P = 0.004 and < 0.001, respectively) and were comparable to those with undetectable ctDNA at both baseline and four weeks. ctDNA detectable at four weeks emerged as a poor independent risk factor for PFS and OS. Patients whose ctDNA became undetectable after treatment had outcomes similar to those with initially undetectable ctDNA, underscoring the predictive value of ctDNA dynamics in treatment efficacy.Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: ChiCTR-DDD-17013131. Date of registration: 2017-10-27.