EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Research Articles

CLINICAL FACTORS PREDECTING T790M MUTATION IN NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PROGRESSED AFTER FIRST- AND SECOND-GENERATION TKI TREATMENT

Objective: We aimed to identify the T790M mutation rate and clinical factors predicting the occurrence of acquired T790M mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations after first- and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Method: The EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who experienced progression after first- and second-generation TKI treatment and underwent testing for EGFR using plasma samples between January 2021 and April 2023 were enrolled. The T90M mutation rate and related clinical factors were evaluated. We utilized the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for univariate analysis and multivariable logistic binary regression for multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 247 patients were eligible for the study. Patients harbored the exon 19 deletion mutation (Del19), exon 21 L858R point mutation, and uncommon mutations in 63.2%, 34.4%, and 2.4% of cases, respectively. The overall T790M mutation rate was 33.6%. In multivariate analyses, the Del19 mutation versus L858R mutation, duration of first-line TKI exceeding 12 months versus below 12 months, and solitary lesion progression versus multiple lesion progression were identified as favorable prognostic factors for the occurrence of T790M mutation. Conclusion: Patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion, a prolonged treatment duration of first-line EGFR-TKI, and solitary lesion progression pattern are more likely to acquire the T790M mutation, as detected by the PCR method in plasma samples.

Efficacy of nivolumab in comparison to chemotherapy and gefitinib for advanced NSCLC

Background: Lung cancer is one of the major causes of cancer related death worldwide, while non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of 85% of all lung cancer cases. Despite adequate treatment, most of the NSCLC patients progress to advance stages. Single or doublet-chemotherapy are considered as standard care for advance NSCLC patients. Gefitinib is considered as standard therapy for EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC. Recently, a human monoclonal antibody called Nivolumab has shown encouraging efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients. The aim of this systematic review is to show the efficacy of nivolumab in comparison to single or doublet chemotherapy and gefitinib. Method: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library to identify primary research, published in English language between 2000 and 2018, involving Nivolumab, chemotherapy and gefitinib for advanced NSCLC patients. The primary outcome of interest was median overall survival (mOS). The secondary outcome of interest were progression free survival, objective response rate and grade-3 and treatment related adverse effects. Results: After screening 600 full-text articles, 17 clinical studies involving 9284 patients of advanced NSCLC were included. All treatment regimen seemed to be feasible. The mOS for nivolumab was ranging between 9.2 months and 16.2 months; for chemotherapy between 6 months and 18.8 months; and for gefitinib between 7.6 months and 30.5 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab is more effective and safe for EGFR non-mutant advanced NSCLC patients than either chemotherapy or gefitinib. However, gefitinib is more effective than nivolumab for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2024; 42: 176-188

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of aumolertinib in real-world treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety profile of aumolertinib in the real-word treatment setting for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 173 EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients who received aumolertinib treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital from April 2020 to December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, while a Cox regression model was used for multifactorial analysis and prognostic factor assessment. Results: Among patients administered first-line aumolertinib (n = 77), the objective remission rate (ORR) of 77.92% was observed, along with a disease control rate (DCR) of 100%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 24.97 months, which did not reach the median overall survival (mOS). The patients treated with aumolertinib after progression on prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (n = 96) exhibited an ORR of 46.88%, a DCR of 89.58%, an mPFS of 15.17 months, and an mOS of 21.27 months. First-line treatment multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact of elevated creatine kinase on PFS (p = 0.016) and a similar significant influence of co-mutation on OS (p = 0.034). Furthermore, subsequent-line treatment multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significant impact of elevated creatine kinase on median PFS (p = 0.026) and a significant effect on the number of metastatic organs (p = 0.017), co-mutation (p = 0.035), and elevated creatine kinase (p = 0.014) on median OS. Conclusion: Aumolertinib has shown clinical significance and can safely be used in the real-world setting for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Abstract CT154: Phase 1/2 clinical trial of JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with 3rd generation EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common driver mutations in NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the recommended front-line option for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, but patients invariably develop acquired resistance and face disease progression. JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI intended for oral administration, selectively and reversibly binds to EGFR mutations, including the C797S and/or T790M mutation that causes resistance to 3rd generation of EGFR-TKIs. Pre-clinical studies with EGFR C797S and/or T790M mutated cell lines showed that JIN-A02 can inhibit cell growth in a dose dependent manner and has a high degree of selectivity over wild-type EGFR. In vivo studies showed that administration of JIN-A02 dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth in the C797S+ xenograft mice model. Moreover, JIN-A02 shown to penetrate blood-brain barrier and exhibit anti-tumor activity in an intracranial tumor model. The strong potency and high selectivity of JIN-A02 for mutant EGFR may offer improved therapeutic window in the clinical setting vs available EGFR-TKIs. Methods: JIN-A02 is being evaluated in this Phase 1/2, multicenter, an open-label trial (NCT05394831) for subjects with advanced NSCLC harboring C797S and/or T790M mutation as a monotherapy. The primary object of this study is to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor effect for determining the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of JIN-A02. The inclusion criteria are that the subject (≥ 18 years) must have an advanced or metastatic NSCLC showed progress disease (PD) after receiving approved standard EGFR-TKI therapies and/or platinum-based anticancer chemotherapy is allowed up to 1 time after using EGFR-TKI treatment with ECOG status 0 or 1. Before enrollment in the study, the EGFR mutation status is determined using either tumor tissue and/or plasma ctDNA. This study comprises three parts, dose escalation (Part A), dose exploration (Part B), and dose expansion (Part C). In Part A, dose escalation, comprised of 5 cohorts ranged from a starting dose of 12.5 mg P.O, QD to a top dose of 150 mg P.O, QD with every three subjects, is carried out where the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is evaluated in subjects with 28-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are evaluated for 21 days. In Part B, dose exploration is carried out to evaluate the safety of JIN-A02 further and to determine the RP2D using 2 preliminary effective dose levels from Part A in subjects. In Part C dose-expansion study, subjects (n=36 for each cohort) are divided into 5 different cohorts based on the EGFR mutation (both or single positive of C797S and T790M), and the anti-tumor activity of JIN-A02 is evaluated according to RECIST v1.1 at RP2D. Citation Format: Sun Min Lim, Byoung Chul Cho, Ji Youn Han, Sang We Kim, Ki Hyeong Lee, Misako Nagasaka, Anna Jo, Ethan Seah, Choonok Kim, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana. Phase 1/2 clinical trial of JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with 3rd generation EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT154.

Abstract 1068: Plasma metabolite biomarkers for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. More than half of the patients are diagnosed in the advanced stage for which the 5-year survival is below 10%. Lung cancer screening using low-dose CT scan reduced lung cancer mortality among heavy smokers. However, no standard screening method exists for non-smokers. Up to 35% and 90% of male and female lung cancer patients in Southeast Asia, respectively, do not smoke. Half of NSCLC patients in this region harbor EGFR mutations, which is common in women and non-smokers. Thus, we sought to explore novel biomarkers that help to identify lung cancer patients and those who have EGFR mutation. Metabolic reprogramming is one of the hallmarks of cancer. It leads to changes in metabolite levels in the blood. Hence, we conducted plasma metabolomic analysis to identify potential metabolite biomarkers in lung cancer patients. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 69 lung cancer patients at Siriraj hospital and 10 healthy individuals during 2018-2022. Plasma metabolites from 29 treatment-naïve EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, 30 treatment-naïve EGFR-wild-type NSCLC patients, 10 treatment-resistant EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC patients, and 10 healthy individuals were profiled using GC-MS and untargeted LC-MS with Metlin database matching. EGFR mutation was detected from plasma ctDNA using real-time PCR. Negative plasma EGFR mutation results were confirmed with corresponding tumor tissues. Metabolomics data were processed by the metabox R package. Results: Among 114 candidate metabolites that passed the variable importance in projection (VIP) cutoff of 1.5, the top ten metabolites that differentiate NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation from those without were shown in Table 1. Many of them can also separate between NSCLC patients and healthy individuals. Table 1. ROC curve analysis Discriminant metabolites (Mutated EGFR vs Wild-type EGFR NSCLC) AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity PG(a-13:0/i-12:0) 0.8000 0.7833 0.8333 0.7333 Nervonic ceramide 0.7736 0.6772 0.7259 0.6333 Valine 0.7678 0.7298 0.7259 0.7333 L-Histidinol 0.7644 0.7281 0.7222 0.7333 Leucine 0.7563 0.7632 0.7259 0.8000 Tryptophan 0.7425 0.6289 0.5593 0.7000 8-methylcaffeine 0.6793 0.6096 0.6222 0.6000 Formic acid 0.6759 0.6447 0.5889 0.7000 PC(20:0/24:0) 0.6506 0.6614 0.8259 0.5000 Sucrose 0.6471 0.6596 0.7593 0.5667 Discriminant metabolites (NSCLC patients vs Healthy individuals) AUC Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Tryptophan 0.9986 0.9867 1.0000 0.9848 PC(20:0/24:0) 0.8609 0.9505 0.6111 1.0000 L-Histidinol 0.8572 0.9625 0.7778 0.9861 Formic acid 0.6696 0.9262 0.6667 0.9704 Conclusions: Plasma L-Histidinol, tryptophan, PC(20:0/24:0), and formic acid are potential metabolite biomarkers for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation. Citation Format: Lucksamon Thamlikitkul, Siriphan Manocheewa, Suphitcha Limjiasahapong, Kwanjeera Wanichthanarak, Atikorn Panya, Naravat Poungvarin, Yotsawat Pomyen, Sakda Khoomrung. Plasma metabolite biomarkers for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1068.

Prognostic impact of clinical and radiological factors on leptomeningeal metastasis from solid cancers.

The number of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) patients has increased in recent years, as the cancer survival rates increased. An optimal prediction of prognosis is essential for selecting an appropriate treatment. The European Association of Neuro-Oncology-European Society for Medical Oncology (EANO-ESMO) guidelines for LM proposed a classification based on the cerebrospinal fluid cytological findings and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pattern. However, few studies have validated the utility of this classification. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of LM, including the radiological and cytological types. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 240 adult patients with suspected LM who had undergone lumbar puncture between April 2014 and September 2021. The most common primary cancer types were non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (143 (60%)) and breast cancer (27 (11%)). Positive cytology results and the presence of leptomeningeal lesions on contrast-enhanced MRI correlated with decreased survival in all patients. Nodular lesions detected on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance were a poor prognostic factor in cytology-negative patients, while contrast-enhanced patterns had no prognostic significance in cytology-positive patients. Systemic therapy using cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted therapy after LM diagnosis correlated with prolonged survival, regardless of the cytology results. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and systemic chemotherapy after LM improved the survival of EGFR-mutated and wild-type NSCLC patients with positive cytology results. This study validated the efficacy of prognostication according to the EANO-ESMO guidelines for LM. Systemic therapy after LM diagnosis improves the survival of NSCLC patients.

Osimertinib readministration for central nervous system metastases in non–small cell lung cancer positive for EGFR activating mutations

BackgroundOsimertinib shows pronounced efficacy for EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including associated central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Tumors inevitably develop resistance to the drug, however. Osimertinib is sometimes readministered after completion of standard chemotherapy. To clarify which patients might receive benefit from osimertinib readministration, we have retrospectively assessed its efficacy with a focus on CNS metastases. MethodsA retrospective analysis of medical records was performed for 21 patients who underwent osimertinib readministration at Kyushu University Hospital between March 2016 and April 2023. CNS metastases were evaluated according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). ResultsAmong the 21 enrolled patients, 16 individuals had target lesions on the basis of RECIST. One (6.3%) of these 16 patients achieved a partial response to osimertinib readministration, with the remaining 15 patients showing stable or progressive disease. The median overall progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival for all 21 patients were 3.8 and 13.9 months, respectively. The efficacy of osimertinib readministration for CNS metastases was evaluable in eight patients including five individuals with leptomeningeal metastases. The objective response rate for CNS metastases and the improvement rate for leptomeningeal metastases were both 100%. The median PFS with regard to CNS or non-CNS lesions for these eight patients was 24.7 and 10.5 months, respectively. ConclusionsOsimertinib readministration showed limited efficacy for non-CNS lesions but excellent efficacy for CNS metastases, suggesting that such treatment is an option for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with CNS metastases.

The efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib in gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Acquired resistance is unavoidable with the approval of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for first-line therapy of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have found that combining antiangiogenesis medicines with EGFR-TKI may benefit clinical outcomes in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. However, it is unclear whether EGFR-TKI paired with antiangiogenesis therapy could further improve survival for patients with gradual progression. Thus, we comprised the clinical effectiveness and safety of continuous EGFR-TKI in combination with anlotinib and EGFR-TKI alone in patients who had gradual progression on third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. The comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) between two groups used the Kaplan-Meier method. Our study comprised 121 eligible patients in total. The objective response rates were 25.0% and 0%, and the disease response rate was 91.7% and 86.9% in the combination group and EGFR-TKIs monotherapy group. The median PFS of combined anlotinib and EGFR-TKI treatment was 6.7 months and the median PFS was 3.6 months in the EGFR-TKI monotherapy group ( P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in OS. The common adverse reactions were diarrhea (21.7%), hypertension (21.6%) and proteinuria (20.0%) in the combination group. Seven patients experienced a grade 3 or higher adverse event, no patients discounted the treatment or died due to the toxicity. Our study indicated that, when combined with anlotinib following gradual progression on EGFR-TKIs, it was more efficacious for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients than EGFR-TKI monotherapy. And the toxicity was clinically manageable.

EfficientNet-Based System for Detecting EGFR-Mutant Status and Predicting Prognosis of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with NSCLC.

We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning-based system using pre-therapy computed tomography (CT) images to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predict the prognosis of advanced-stage patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). This retrospective, multicenter study included 485 patients with NSCLC from four hospitals. Of them, 339 patients from three centers were included in the training dataset to develop an EfficientNetV2-L-based model (EME) for predicting EGFR-mutant status, and the remaining patients were assigned to an independent test dataset. EME semantic features were extracted to construct an EME-prognostic model to stratify the prognosis of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKI. A comparison of EME and radiomics was conducted. Additionally, we included patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas lung adenocarcinoma dataset with both CT images and RNA sequencing data to explore the biological associations between EME score and EGFR-related biological processes. EME obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.907 (95% CI 0.840-0.926) on the test dataset, superior to the radiomics model (P = 0.007). The EME and radiomics fusion model showed better (AUC, 0.941) but not significantly increased performance (P = 0.895) compared with EME. In prognostic stratification, the EME-prognostic model achieved the best performance (C-index, 0.711). Moreover, the EME-prognostic score showed strong associations with biological pathways related to EGFR expression and EGFR-TKI efficacy. EME demonstrated a non-invasive and biologically interpretable approach to predict EGFR status, stratify survival prognosis, and correlate biological pathways in patients with NSCLC.

Functional Heterogeneity in MET Pathway Activation in PDX Models of Osimertinib-resistant EGFR-driven Lung Cancer.

Using a novel cohort of in vivo PDX models of MET pathway activation with acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, we demonstrate that phospho-MET may be a clinically relevant assay to guide treatment selection with osimertinib and savolitinib combination. In addition, our work shows that patients with MET polysomy tumors may have subclonal MET amplification and therefore require close follow up for the use of osimertinib and savolitinib combination.

A real-world cohort study of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Vietnam

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of first-line afatinib treatment in a real-world setting in Vietnam.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted across nine hospitals in Vietnam. Advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received afatinib as first-line therapy between April 2018 and June 2022 were included, and patient medical records were reviewed. Key outcomes were overall response rate (ORR), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and tolerability.ResultsA total of 343 patients on first-line afatinib were eligible for the study. EGFR exon 19 deletion (Del19) alone was detected in 46.9% of patients, L858R mutation alone in 26.3%, and other uncommon EGFR mutations, including compound mutations, in 26.8%. Patients with brain metastases at baseline were 25.4%. Patients who received 40 mg, 30 mg, and 20 mg as starting doses of afatinib were 58.6%, 39.9%, and 1.5%, respectively. The ORR was 78.1% in the overall population, 82.6% in the Del19 mutation subgroup, 73.3% in the L858R mutation subgroup, and 75.0% in the uncommon mutation subgroup (p > 0.05). The univariate and multivariate analyses indicate that the ORR increased when the starting dose was 40 mg compared to starting doses below 40 mg (83.9% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.034). The median TTF (mTTF) was 16.7 months (CI 95%: 14.8–18.5) in all patients, with a median follow-up time of 26.2 months. The mTTF was longer in patients in the common EGFR mutation subgroup (Del19/L858R) than in those in the uncommon mutation subgroup (17.5 vs. 13.8 months, p = 0.045) and in those without versus with brain metastases at baseline (17.5 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in the mTTF between subgroups based on the starting dose of 40 mg and < 40 mg (16.7 vs. 16.9 months, p > 0.05). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade/grade ≥ 3) were diarrhea (55.4%/3.5%), rash (51.9%/3.2%), paronychia (35.3%/5.0%), and stomatitis (22.2%/1.2%).ConclusionsAfatinib demonstrated clinical effectiveness and good tolerability in Vietnamese EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. In our real-world setting, administering a starting dose below 40 mg might result in a reduction in ORR; however, it might not have a significant impact on TTF.

Factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival of patients treated with first-line afatinib for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (>36 months) of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations treated with first-line afatinib. We performed a retrospective analysis of data of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving first-line afatinib at two tertiary care referral centers, Linkou and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, in Taiwan between June 2014 and April 2022. The data of 546 treatment-naïve EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients were analyzed. Median PFS and overall survival were 14.5 months and 27.2 months, respectively. The PFS of 462 patients (84.6%) was less than 36 months and of 84 patients (15.4%) was more than 36 months. The PFS > 36 months group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with uncommon mutations (p = 0.002). The PFS ≤36 months group had significantly higher incidences of bone, liver, and adrenal metastases (all p < 0.05) and a higher rate of multiple distant metastases. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that liver metastasis was negatively and independently associated with prolonged PFS (adjusted odds ratio = 0.246 [95% CI: 0.067-0.908], p = 0.035). The median overall survival of the PFS >36 months group was 46.0 months and that of the PFS ≤36 months group was 22.9 months (log-rank test, p < 0.001). We found that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib were prone to shorter PFS if they had distant organ metastasis, especially liver metastasis.

Simulation analysis of EGFR mutation detection: Oncomine Dx target test and AmoyDx panel impact on lung cancer treatment decisions

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) driver mutations are crucial for treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the differences in EGFR mutation detection between two companion diagnostic (CDx) tests—the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) and the AmoyDx Pan Lung Cancer PCR Panel—and their impact on treatment applicability. To this end, we used an in-house targeted sequencing dataset of 282 samples from 127 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients to simulate the concordance between the EGFR variants targeted by the ODxTT and AmoyDx panel, the oncogenicity of the variants, and their therapeutic potential. Of the 216 EGFR mutations identified by the in-house panel, 51% were detectable by both CDx tests, 3% were specific to ODxTT, and 46% were not targeted by either test. Most non-targeted mutations did not have oncogenicity and were located outside exons 18–21. Notably, 95% of the mutations detectable by both tests had potential oncogenicity. Furthermore, among the 96 patients harboring actionable EGFR mutations, 97% had mutations detectable by both CDx tests and 1% by ODxTT, while 2% had mutations not covered by either test. These findings suggest that while both CDx tests are effective in detecting almost all actionable EGFR mutations, ODxTT provides slightly broader coverage. These results emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate CDx tests to inform treatment decisions for EGFR-positive NSCLC patients.

Comparison of osimertinib plus bevacizumab against osimertinib alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients' characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis. A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73-1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90-1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance. Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.

A phase II study of atezolizumab with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after TKI treatment failure (NEJ043 study)

IntroductionTreatment options for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment failure are limited. An exploratory analysis of 26 patients in the IMpower150 study indicated that treatment with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) was effective in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of ABCP in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after TKI treatment. MethodsPatients with non-squamous NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations were enrolled. ABCP therapy was administered every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to extramural review (ER). Key secondary endpoints and preplanned analysis included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and differences in the efficacy of ABCP according to prior EGFR-TKI administration, liver metastases, and brain metastases. ResultsSixty patients from 26 centers were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7–8.2). The median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI: 13.1-not reached), and the ORR was 55.9%. PFS was significantly shorter in patients who had received osimertinib as a first-line treatment (7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.932, p = 0.023), those with brain metastases (5.7 months vs. 8 months, HR 1.86, p = 0.032), or those with liver metastases (5.4 months vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.779, p = 0.003). ConclusionsAlthough this study did not meet the primary endpoint, ABCP showed clinically meaningful efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Outcomes of surgery and subsequent therapy for central nervous system oligoprogression in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients

BackgroundOligoprogression is an emerging issue in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the surgical treatment for central nervous system (CNS) oligoprogression is not widely discussed. We investigated the outcomes of craniotomy with adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and subsequent therapies for CNS oligoprogression in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.MethodsNSCLC patients with CNS oligoprogression were identified from a tertiary medical center. The outcomes of surgery with adjuvant WBRT or WBRT alone were analyzed, along with other variables. Overall survival and progression-free survival were analyzed using the log-rank test as the primary and secondary endpoints. A COX regression model was used to identify the possible prognostic factors.ResultsThirty-seven patients with CNS oligoprogression who underwent surgery or WBRT were included in the study after reviewing 728 patients. Twenty-one patients underwent surgery with adjuvant WBRT, and 16 received WBRT alone. The median overall survival for surgery and WBRT alone groups was 43 (95% CI 17–69) and 22 (95% CI 15–29) months, respectively. Female sex was a positive prognostic factor for overall survival (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.57). Patients who continued previous tyrosine kinase inhibitors (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.06–11.4) and induced oligoprogression (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.18–9.52) were associated with worse overall survival. Smoking history (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.54–11.8) and induced oligoprogression (OR 5.53, 95% CI 2.1–14.7) were associated with worse progression-free survival.ConclusionsSurgery combined with adjuvant WBRT is a feasible treatment modality for CNS oligoprogression in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Changing the systemic-targeted therapy after local treatments may be associated with improved overall survival.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients’ outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99–1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0–1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54–0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66–0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0–1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31–0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13–1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02–4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12–0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28–1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

A retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of Endostar with chemotherapy in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC

BackgroundEndostar is a strong angiogenesis inhibitor that is effective in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the effect of Endostar in the treatment of patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC remains unclear. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of Endostar in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients resistant to EGFR inhibition treatment.MethodsFrom January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018, 68 patients were selected from the 4 institutions for the study. Patients with NSCLC received Endostar plus chemotherapy every 21-day cycle. Chemotherapy types included platinum-containing dual drugs and platinum-free single drugs. Endostar was administered by intermittent intravenous infusion or continuous microinfusion pump infusion. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events were analyzed. Survival of patients was also evaluated.ResultsFor all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months. PFS and OS in the Endostar pump continuous group were better than those in the Endostar intravenous infusion group. The disease control rate (DCR) was 79.4%. A total of 28 (41.2%) patients experienced varying grades of adverse events during treatment. No treatment-associated deaths were observed. The grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were myelosuppression, weakness, and nausea/vomiting.ConclusionsEndostar was effective and well tolerated in advanced NSCLC patients. Endostar treatment showed promising survival results in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Resistance to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC: a prospective study of molecular genotyping on tissue and liquid biopsies.

Resistance to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes a significant challenge for clinicians either in terms of molecular diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic implications. This is a prospective single-centre study with the primary objective of characterising resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated both in first- and in second-line. Next-Generation Sequencing analysis was conducted on paired tissue biopsies and plasma samples. A concordance analysis between tissue and plasma was performed. Sixty-five advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib in first- (n = 56) or in second-line (n = 9) were included. We managed to perform tissue and liquid biopsies in 65.5% and 89.7% of patients who experienced osimertinib progression, respectively. Acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 80% of 25 patients with post-progression samples, with MET amplification (n = 8), EGFR C797S (n = 3), and SCLC transformation (n = 2) the most frequently identified. The mean concordance rates between tissue and plasma for the EGFR activating mutation and for the molecular resistance mechanisms were 87.5% and 22.7%, respectively. Resistance to osimertinib demonstrated to be highly heterogeneous, with MET amplification the main mechanism. Plasma genotyping is a relevant complementary tool which might integrate tissue analysis for the study of resistance mechanisms.

Front-line therapy for brain metastases and non-brain metastases in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC patients. However, intracranial activity varies in different drugs. Thus, brain metastasis (BM) should be considered when choosing the treatment regimens. We conducted this network meta-analysis to explore the optimal first-line therapeutic schedule for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with different BM statuses. Randomized controlled trials focusing on EGFR-TKIs (alone or in combination) in advanced and EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, who have not received systematic treatment, were systematically searched up to December 2021. We extracted and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A network meta-analysis was performed with the Bayesian statistical model to determine the survival outcomes of all included therapy regimens using the R software. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare intervention measures, and overall rankings of therapies were estimated under the Bayesian framework. This analysis included 17 RCTs with 5077 patients and 12 therapies, including osimertinib + bevacizumab, aumolertinib, osimertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, standards of care (SoC, including gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), SoC + apatinib, SoC + bevacizumab, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + pemetrexed based chemotherapy (PbCT), PbCT, and pemetrexed free chemotherapy (PfCT). For patients with BM, SoC + PbCT improved PFS compared with SoC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), and osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank first in PFS, with a cumulative probability of 34.5%, followed by aumolertinib, with a cumulative probability of 28.3%. For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib, aumolertinib, SoC + PbCT, dacomitinib, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + bevacizumab, and afatinib showed superior efficacy compared with SoC (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77; HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38-0.66; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76; HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50-1.00), PbCT (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.74; HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.64; HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21-0.82; HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22-0.87; HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.75), and PfCT (HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32; HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.26; HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.29; HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.35; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12-0.31; HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16-0.34) in terms of PFS. And, SoC + apatinib showed relatively superior PFS when compared with PbCT (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92) and PfCT (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.39), but similar PFS to SoC (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-1.03). No statistical differences were observed for PFS in patients without BM between PbCT and SoC (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.84-2.64), but both showed favorable PFS when compared with PfCT (PfCT vs. SoC, HR = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.06-4.55; PbCT vs. PfCT, HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.32). For OS, SoC + PbCT was most likely to rank first in patients with and without BM, with cumulative probabilities of 46.8%, and 37.3%, respectively. Osimertinib + bevacizumab is most likely to rank first in PFS in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with or without BM, and SoC + PbCT is most likely to rank first in OS.