Efficacy Of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Research Articles

Efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus rituximab in non-responsive immune thrombocytopenia-A single centre retrospective analysis.

Management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) beyond initial glucocorticoid therapy is challenging. In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, we compared all ITP patients relapsed or non-responsive to glucocorticoid therapy treated with either continuous TPO-RAs (n = 35) or rituximab induction (n = 20) between 2015 and 2022. While both groups showed high initial complete response rates (CR, 68.6 vs. 80.0%, ns), the overall rate of progression to the next therapy was higher after time-limited rituximab (75.0 vs. 42.9%), resulting in a lower relapse-free survival (median 16.6 vs. 25.8 months, log-rank; p < 0.05). We conclude that both treatments show similar initial efficacy and their ideal duration of therapy warrants further investigation.

Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Receiving TPO-RA : Multicenter Mixed-Design Study

Introduction The thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), such as Avatrombopag (AVA), Eltrombopag (ELT), and Romiplostim (ROM), have, in recent years, changed ITP treatment, showing that there is both increased platelet destruction and suboptimal platelet production in ITP. ELT and AVA are oral drugs, while ROM is subcutaneous, and studies have shown that absorption of ELT can be affected by meals. Thus, for optimum absorption, patients are counseled to take it on an empty stomach at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal and at least 2 hours before and 4 hours after calcium-containing meals. However, in Muslim countries where the 16/8 type of intermittent fasting is practiced by religion, the scheduling of drug consumption can be affected. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of fasting on patients with ITP receiving different Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) brands. Methods A Multicenter, mixed design study was performed in which we interviewed Muslim patients (n = 100) who were 18 years of age or older in Qatar, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia and fasted Ramadan while receiving TPO-RA treatment between the years of 2015 and 2023. Clinical and biological parameters are recorded using using a standardized patient form. Fasting status was confirmed by a telephone call to each patient. Patients' responses were retrospectively evaluated before, during, and after Ramadan. A statistically significant result was identified with a P-value of &amp;lt; 0.05. Bleeding tendency was also evaluated as either no bleeding, minor cutaneous and mucosal bleeding, or life-threatening bleeding involving major organs (i.e., central nervous system, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary). Results A hundred patients were identified who matched our inclusion criteria for this study. Platelet responses were different among the 3 products, and statistical significance was attributed to the product's compromised efficacy due to disturbed meal schedules and decreased absorption. For patients on AVA, the drug efficacy was not directly affected by meal schedule and absorption but instead was affected by patient compliance. The mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 146.11 ± 111.76, while during Ramadan it dropped to 131.7 ± 107.6. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference 146.11 ± 111.76 vs. 134.17 ± 60.9. For patients on ELT, the mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 120.02 ± 59.7, while during Ramadan it dropped to 100.8 ± 68.16. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference 120.02 ± 59.7 vs. 136.04 ± 74.86. For patients on ROM, the mean platelet count before Ramadan was estimated at 122.68 ± 80.57, while during Ramadan it was 130.94 ± 84.96. Whereas when comparing platelets before and after Ramadan, there was an insignificant difference but an increase in platelet count 122.68 ± 80.57 vs 212.0 ± 113.72. Only 3% (3 patients on ELT) of the patients fasting during Ramadan experienced bleeding episodes. 2 of which experienced minor bleeding (ecchymosis and gingival bleeding), and 1 had major bleeding episodes (Lt. hemorrhagic infarction). 47% of the patients experienced a complete response (PLT&amp;gt;100x10 9) among the three products, and 17% experienced a partial response (PLT 51-100x10 9) 36.6% of the patients on AVA showed a complete response, 46.15% of patients on ELT, and 63.15% of patients on ROM. Conclusion TPO-RAs achieve target platelet counts in adult ITP patients. However, the absorption of ELT is highly affected by food consumption, and thus it is critical to adhere to the instructions given on how the dose should be adjusted and consumed on an empty stomach. AVA absorption didn't show compromise with food consumption, and its efficacy may depend only on patient's compliance. ROM showed better adherence to the medication schedule compared to ELT, contributing to its subcutaneous form and a tailored home visit program given weekly by trained nurses, enhancing patient compliance. The general tolerability and efficacy of TPO-RAs may be reflected on incidence of no major bleeding and the better efficacy of AVA and ROM, which are not affected by fasting.

Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists and Rituximab in Treating Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Systematic Review

Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists and Rituximab in Treating Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Systematic Review

Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Evans Syndrome: An International Multicenter Experience

Background: Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare condition, defined as the presence of two autoimmune cytopenias (AIC), more frequently autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and rarely autoimmune neutropenia (AIN). ES can be classified as primary or secondary to various conditions, including lymphoproliferative disease (LPD), primary immune deficiencies (PID) or other systemic autoimmune diseases (AID). ES onset may be acute and life-threatening, whilst its clinical course is usually chronic and marked by several relapses of AIHA, ITP or both. First line therapy is based on steroids +/- intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), followed by rituximab and splenectomy in refractory/relapsing cases. Concerning ITP, splenectomy is not always feasible, and rituximab is poorly effective on the long term. Thrombopoietin receptors agonists (TPO-RA), such as romiplostim (ROMI) and eltrombopag (EPAG), are commonly used in primary ITP with high efficacy; however, their use in ES has never been systematically studied.Aim: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TPO-RA in a multicentric cohort of patients with ES.Methods: all ES patients treated with TPO-RA at 8 European hematologic hospitals (3 Italian, 2 Danish, 1 United Kingdom and 2 Spanish) were retrospectively evaluated. Baseline hematologic parameters, associated conditions, previous treatments and those administered concomitantly to TPO-RA were registered. The time from diagnosis to first TPO-RA was collected. Response rates were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and classified as partial (PR) or complete (CR), for platelets >30x10^9/L or >100x10^9/L, respectively. Treatment emergent adverse events (TAEs) were registered and graded according to CTCAE.R esults: As shown in Figure 1, 22 ES patients have been evaluated, 9 of whom secondary (40%). Almost all patients had received steroids +/- IVIG, and the majority at least one further line. The median time from diagnosis to TPO-RA start was 25,74 months (1-1390). Response rates to the first TPO-RA (16 EPAG and 6 ROMI) were: 82% at month 1, 84% at month 3, 83% at month 6 and 93% at month12. Eight patients started TPO-RA within 1 year from ES diagnosis. These patients displayed significantly lower platelets (p=0.01) as compared to others, however response rates were comparable. Of note, 73% of patients required concurrent therapies, including steroids +/- IVIG (N=13), danazol (N=2), rituximab (N=3), and immunosuppressants (N=3). Moreover, 7 patients required the addition of a rescue therapy to control ITP (steroids +/- IVIG N=4, rituximab N=1, danazol N=1, daratumumab N=1, immunosuppressants N=2, parsaclisib N=1), particularly in secondary ES (63% vs 33%). The latters less frequently showed increased bone marrow megakaryocytes (67% vs 92%) but had higher dysplasia (50% of patients vs 33% in primary ES). Interestingly, 5 subjects switched to the alternative TPO-RA (3 ROMI to EPAG and 2 vice versa) 2 because of no response (NR), and 3 for relapses. Three subjects responded but required additional therapies, including splenectomy, steroids +/- IVIG, or platelet transfusions. Ten out of 22 patients developed at least one TEAE: G1 thrombocytosis (N=1), G2 bone marrow fibrosis (N=1), G3/4 thrombosis (3 venous and 2 arterial: 1 pulmonary embolism, 1 cerebral vein thrombosis CVT, and 1 splanchnic thrombosis, 1 atrial thrombus and 1 acute myocardial infarction in the same APS patient experiencing CVT). Thrombosis was associated with the presence of secondary ES (p=0.03). Five patients are still receiving TPO-RA, whilst the other stopped because of persistent CR (N=12), thrombosis (N=3), increase in bone marrow reticulin fibrosis (N=1), or death for infectious complication.Conclusions: TPO-RAs were effective in more than 80% of ES patients, even heavily pre-treated. However, TPO-RA use was complicated by a high occurrence of thrombotic events that may be also favored by the underlying conditions. Additionally, TPO-RA required a concomitant therapy in the majority of patients, suggesting that in ES autoimmune platelet destruction cannot be completely overcome by bone marrow stimulation. [Display omitted] DisclosuresPatriarca: Incyte: Honoraria; Argenix: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Glenthøj: Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Saniona: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Alexion: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Lund Hansen: Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Frederiksen: Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Gonzalez-Lopez: Sobi: Other: Advisory board honoraria; Amgen: Other: Advisory board and speakers honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisoryboard and speakers honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Other: Advisory board honoraria. Barcellini: Novartis: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fattizzo: Kira: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Momenta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Speakers Bureau; Annexon: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure:Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients suffered from Evans syndrome when ITP is refractory/relapsing to standard therapies

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Adults With Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) play a crucial role in stimulating thrombopoiesis. However, conventional meta-analyses have shown inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists versus placebo. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to assess the effects of five TPO-RAs via indirect comparison. For this network meta-analysis, we considered randomized trials that included any of the following interventions: avatrombopag, lusutrombopag, eltrombopag, romiplostim, recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO). We searched the Medline, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled clinical trials from inception to January 31, 2021. We use randomized controlled clinical trials of TPO-RAs for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in adults. The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving platelet response which was defined as the achievement of a platelet count of more than 30 or 50 cells × 109/L in the absence of rescue therapy, and the secondary outcome was the therapy-related serious adverse events and incidence of bleeding episodes. To obtain the estimates of efficacy and safety outcomes, we performed a random-effects network meta-analysis. These estimates were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We use surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities to rank the comparative effects and safety of all drugs against the placebo. In total, 2,207 patients were analyzed in 20 clinical trials. All preparations improved the point estimates of platelet response when compared with the placebo. Avatrombopag and lusutrombopag had the best platelet response compared to the placebo, the former had a non-significant advantage compared to the latter [odds ratio (OR) = 1.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.52, 7.05)]. The treatments were better than eltrombopag, romiplostim, rituximab, and rhTPO + rituximab, with corresponding ORs of 3.10 (1.01, 9.51), 9.96 (2.29, 43.29), 33.09 (8.76, 125.02), and 21.31 (3.78, 119.98) for avatrombopag and 1.62 (0.63, 4.17), 5.21 (1.54, 17.62), 17.34 (5.15, 58.36), and 11.16 (2.16, 57.62) for lusutrombopag. Regarding bleeding, the placebo group had the highest probability of bleeding, whereas lusutrombopag had the lowest risk of bleeding when compared to the placebo. Adverse events were slightly higher in patients receiving rituximab than in those receiving placebo or other treatments. Overall, this meta-analysis showed that avatrombopag may yield the highest efficacy because it has the most favorable balance of benefits and acceptability.

Adult Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Safety and Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists and Rituximab

Adult Chronic Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Safety and Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists and Rituximab

Safety and Efficacy of the Off-Label Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Immune Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Results from a Multicentre Observational Study

Safety and Efficacy of the Off-Label Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Immune Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Results from a Multicentre Observational Study

Safety and Efficacy of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Patients with Previously Treated Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The current American Society of Hematology guideline recommends the use of thrombopoietin receptor agonists, eltrombopag or romiplostim as one of the second-line therapies for chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The efficacy and safety of those drugs have been tested in several clinical trials. However, the safety profile was not consistent throughout trials and is not yet well understood. We herein conducted a meta-analysis of randomized control trials to compare the safety and efficacy of thrombopoietin receptor agonists; eltrombopag and romiplostim versus placebo in patients with previously treated chronic ITP. Our primary outcome was drug-related adverse events greater than CTCAE grade 3.Methods: We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and the American Society of Hematology website up to September, 2015 by two independent authors according to PRISMA guideline. We included only randomized clinical trials comparing eltrombopag or romiplostim versus placebo. Random-effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: A total of eight trials involving 834 participants were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference of grade 3 or higher adverse events between placebo and treatment group (OR=1.01, 95% CI=0.57-1.78). Thromboembolism (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.20-1.73), elevated ALT (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.26-1.74), headache (OR=1.26, 95% CI=0.90-1.78), nausea (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.43-1.55), or fatigue (OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.65-1.91) did not show a significant difference between groups, either. Clinical response, which is defined as platelets ≥50,000/μL at least once on treatment was significantly better in treatment group than in placebo group (OR=0.10, 95% CI=0.07-0.15). Bleeding symptoms (WHO Grades 1-4) were significantly more frequent in the placebo group (OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.14-2.24) during treatment.Conclusions: Although several studies have suggested clinically significant treatment-related adverse events, such as thromboembolism, this meta-analysis showed that thrombopoietin receptor agonists are safe, well-tolerated, and effective in patients with previously treated chronic ITP. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Use of a thrombopoietin receptor agonist in von Willebrand disease type 2B (p.V1316M) with severe thrombocytopenia and intracranial hemorrhage

We present here a 63-year old woman with a long history of immune thrombocytopenia. She was hospitalized for a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage with thrombocytopenia. Following inefficient treatment of four platelet transfusions, immunoglobulins, and corticosteroids, we initiated treatment with a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist (eltrombopag 25 mg/d) with a good efficacy. Her mother and sister also had chronic thrombocytopenia. Clinical history, hemostasis results, and gene analysis revealed von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2B with the mutation (c.3946G>A; p.V1316M), which combines a von Willebrand factor defect with severe thrombocytopenia, as well as a thrombocytopathy. The efficacy of TPO receptor agonists appears to counterbalance, at least to some extent, the thrombocytopathy associated with this mutation. As such, the use of TPO receptor agonists could represent an alternative therapeutic approach in cases of VWD type 2B with severe thrombocytopenia.

Safety and efficacy of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists in myelodysplastic syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Thrombocytopenia is common (40-65%) and potentially serious in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). A systematic review was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of adding a thrombopoietin-receptor (THPO-R) agonist to standard MDS treatment. MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched. We included randomized controlled trials comparing a THPO-R agonist to placebo. A meta-analysis of the effects was performed. Endpoints included bleeding and platelet transfusion rates, risk of progression to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and mortality. Three hundred and eighty four patients from five trials were included, four using romiplostim and one using eltrombopag. Overall, the relative risk (RR) of bleeding with romiplostim versus placebo was 0·84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0·57-1·24]. However, compared to placebo, romiplostim significantly decreased the exposure-adjusted bleeding rate (RR 0·92; 95% CI: 0·86-0·99), as well as the exposure-adjusted platelet transfusion rate (RR 0·69; 95% CI: 0·53-0·88). The RR of AML progression with romiplostim was 1·36 (95% CI: 0·54-3·40), however the outcome data were judged as higher risk of bias. Romiplostim is promising in its ability to decrease patient-important outcomes: bleeding and platelet transfusion need. Although the risk of AML progression was not increased, due to unclear risk of bias in the data, this safety concern is difficult to assess. Therefore, romiplostim cannot yet be routinely recommended. Early eltrombopag data is promising.