Efficacy Of Sunitinib In Patients Research Articles

Sunitinib for metastatic progressive phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: results from FIRSTMAPPP, an academic, multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial

No randomised controlled trial has ever been done in patients with metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Preclinical and first clinical evidence suggested beneficial effects of sunitinib. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. FIRSTMAPPP is a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial done at 14 academic centres across four European countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with sporadic or inherited progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral sunitinib (37·5 mg per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified according to SDHB status (mutation present vs wild type) and number of previous systemic therapies (0 vs ≥1). Primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival at 12 months according to real-time central review (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1). On the basis of a two-step Simon model, we aimed for the accrual of 78 patients, assuming a 20% improvement of the 12-month progression-free survival rate from 20% to 40%, to conclude that sunitinib is effective. Crossover from the placebo group was allowed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01371201, and is closed for enrolment. From Dec 1, 2011, to Jan 31, 2019, a total of 78 patients with progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas were enrolled (39 patients per group). 25 (32%) of 78 patients had germline SDHx variants and 54 (69%) had used previous therapies. The primary endpoint was met, with a 12-month progression-free survival in 14 of 39 patients (36% [90% CI 23-50]) in the sunitinib group. In the placebo group, the 12-month progression-free survival in seven of 39 patients was 19% (90% CI 11-31), validating the hypotheses of our study design. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were asthenia (seven [18%] of 39 and one [3%] of 39), hypertension (five [13%] and four [10%]), and back or bone pain (one [3%] and three [8%]) in the sunitinib and placebo groups, respectively. Three deaths occurred in the sunitinib group: these deaths were due to respiratory insufficiency, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and rectal bleeding. Only the latter event was considered drug related. Two deaths occurred in the placebo group due to aspiration pneumonia and septic shock. This first randomised trial supports the use of sunitinib as the medical option with the highest level of evidence for anti-tumour efficacy in progressive metastatic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. French Ministry of Health, through the National Institute for Cancer, German Ministry of Education and Research, and the German Research Foundation within the CRC/Transregio 205/2, EU Seventh Framework Programme, and a private donator grant.

Efficacy of Sunitinib in Patients With Favorable and Intermediate Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma - Lithuanian National Cancer Institute Experience.

According to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations, sunitinib is one of the recommended regimens for favorable and intermediate-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate sunitinib efficacy as a first-line treatment for mRCC patients with favorable/intermediate prognostic risk in a real-world setting. Patients diagnosed with mRCC and confirmed as appropriate candidates for the first-line systemic treatment were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic risk was evaluated according to the model of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Patients received sunitinib as a first-line treatment. A total of 94 patients were enrolled from 2019 to the 2020and 67 of them were included in the detailed analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23.4 (95%CI=17.3-29.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 66 months (95%CI=44.9-87.1). The age over 60 years was a significant negative predictor for PFS and OS. Regarding the IMDC model for disease risk prediction, the number of two risk factors in the intermediate risk group was a significant predictor for a shorter response to the first-line therapy. Sunitinib is an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can be used as a first-line treatment in favorable/intermediate-risk groups of patients with mRCC, especially in countries where novel systemic treatment modalities are not yet available.

Special issue "The advance of solid tumor research in China": Prediction of Sunitinib efficacy using computed tomography in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Clinically effective methods to predict the efficacy of sunitinib, for patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) are scarce, making precision treatment difficult. This study aimed to develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based method to predict the efficacy of sunitinib in patients with panNET. Pretreatment CT images of 171 lesions from 38 patients with panNET were included. CT value ratio (CT value of tumor/CT value of abdominal aorta from the same patient) and radiomics features were extracted for model development. Receiver operating curve (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the proposed model. Tumor shrinkage of >10% at first follow-up after sunitinib treatment was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001) and was used as the major treatment outcome. The CT value ratio could predict tumor shrinkage with AUC of 0.759 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.685-0.833). We then developed a radiomics signature, which showed significantly higher AUC in training (0.915; 95% CI, 0.866-0.964) and validation (0.770; 95% CI, 0.584-0.956) sets than CT value ratio. DCA also confirmed the clinical utility of the model. Subgroup analysis showed that this radiomics signature had a high accuracy in predicting tumor shrinkage both for primary and metastatic tumors, and for treatment-naive and pretreated tumors. Survival analysis showed that radiomics signature correlated with PFS (P=.020). The proposed radiomics-based model accurately predicted tumor shrinkage and PFS in patients with panNET receiving sunitinib and may help select patients suitable for sunitinib treatment.

Sunitinib efficacy in patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma

Sunitinib efficacy in patients with disseminated renal cell carcinoma

Soluble forms of PD-L1 and PD-1 as prognostic and predictive markers of sunitinib efficacy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) benefits from several treatment options in the first-line setting with VEGFR inhibitors and/or immunotherapy including anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD1 agents. Identification of predictive biomarkers is highly needed to optimize patient care. Circulating markers could reflect the biology of metastatic disease. Therefore, we evaluated soluble forms of PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and PD-1 (sPD-1) in mccRCC patients. The levels of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 were evaluated from plasma samples of mccRCC patients before they received a first-line treatment (T0) by the VEGFR inhibitor sunitinib (50 patients) or by the anti-VEGF bevacizumab (37 patients). The levels of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 were correlated to clinical parameters and progression-free survival (PFS). High levels of sPD-1 or sPDL1 were not correlated to PFS under bevacizumab while they were independent prognostic factors of PFS in the sunitinib group. Patients with high T0 plasmatic levels of sPD-L1 had a shorter PFS (11.3 vs 22.5 months, p = .011) in the sunitinib group. Equivalent shorter PFS was found with high levels of sPD-1 (8.6 vs 14.1 months, p = .009). mccRCC patients with high plasmatic levels of sPD-L1 or sPD-1 are poor responders to sunitinib. sPD-L1 or sPD-1 could be a valuable tool to guide the optimal treatment strategy including VEGFR inhibitor.

Clinical outcomes of imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib in first-line imatinib-failure gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Aim: The majority of available data on the clinical efficacy of sunitinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are from studies of western populations. We investigated the clinical outcomes of imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib in first-line imatinib-failure Asian GIST patients to further guide clinical treatment.Methods: Patients received imatinib dose escalation and a shift to sunitinib (Group A) or a direct shift to sunitinib (Group B). The objective tumour response was assessed according to Choi’s criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. The relationship between genetic mutation and survival was analysed.Results: In total, 40 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited. The differences in survival between Group A and Group B were not significant for PFS (p = .776) or OS (p = .219). For patients with KIT exon 11 mutation, a trend towards a better PFS was found in Group B (p = .122), OS of Group B was better than Group A (p = .013). The median PFS and OS of sunitinib treatment were 8 and 24 months, respectively, and a clinical benefit was observed in 80%. Patients with KIT exon 11 mutations had better PFS compared to those with KIT exon 9 mutations or wild-type GISTs (p = .017, p = .040, respectively).Conclusions: Both imatinib dose escalation and sunitinib were optional in Asian patients after failure of first-line imatinib, and patients with KIT exon 11 mutation benefited more from a direct shift to sunitinib.

Long-term results of therapy with sunitinib in metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma.

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, highly vascularized soft tissue sarcoma characterized by a high frequency of metastatic disease and resistance to classical chemotherapy. The purpose of our analysis was to assess long-term sunitinib activity in the treatment of metastatic ASPS. Between 2009 and 2015, 15 patients were diagnosed with metastatic ASPS and received therapy with sunitinib at initial continuous daily dosing of 37.5 mg. Median age was 32 years. The primary tumor sites were lower extremities (8), trunk-retroperitoneum/pelvis (2), upper extremity (3) and other (2). All patients had unresectable disease (primary or relapse in the form of metastases to the lungs ± bones). Five patients received systemic therapy before initiating sunitinib. Median follow-up from start of sunitinib was 38 months (range 5-69 months). At the time of analysis 4 patients continue therapy and 9 are still alive. Six patients had RECIST partial remission as best response, 8 had stable disease, and 1 had disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 19 months, with 86% of patients being free of progression at 6 months. Median overall survival was 56 months; the 5-year overall survival rate was 49%. Five patients were treated with sunitinib longer than 2 years. All patients experienced some side effects: 8 patients (53%) had CTCAE grade 3/4 toxicity, 7 patients required dose reduction. The most common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypothyroidism, arterial hypertension, and hand-foot syndrome. Our analysis confirms the long-term efficacy of sunitinib in patients with advanced ASPS.

Evaluation of KDR rs34231037 as a predictor of sunitinib efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The identification of biomarkers able to predict clinical benefit from vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors is urgently needed. Recently, Maitland and colleagues described an association between KDR-rs34231037 and soluble VEGFR2 levels as well as pazopanib pharmacodynamics. We investigated in a well-characterized series of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients whether rs34231037 could influence sunitinib response. Clinical data and DNA were available from an international series of 276 patients. KDR-rs34231037 association with sunitinib response, clinical benefit, and progression-free survival was analyzed using logistic and Cox regression analyses. We found that G-allele carriers were over-represented among patients with clinical benefit during sunitinib treatment compared with those refractory to the treatment (odds ratio: 3.78; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-14.06; P=0.047, multivariable analysis). In conclusion, rs34231037 variant carriers seemed to have better sunitinib response than wild-type patients. Moreover, the association with tumor size reduction suggests that this single nucleotide polymorphism might also identify patients with successful tumor downsizing under anti-VEGFR therapy.

Safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients from Latin America: subanalysis of an expanded access trial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BackgroundSunitinib is an approved treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The safety profile and efficacy of sunitinib were confirmed in a global expanded access trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00130897). This report presents a subanalysis of the final trial data from patients in Latin America.MethodsTreatment-naïve or previously treated mRCC patients aged ≥18 years received oral sunitinib at a starting dose of 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Safety was assessed regularly, and tumor measurements were scheduled per local practice (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).ResultsIn total, 348 patients from Latin America received sunitinib. Overall, 75% of patients had two or more sites of metastatic disease, 28% were aged ≥65 years, 14% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 9% had brain metastases, 9% had no prior nephrectomy, and 5% had non-clear cell RCC. Median treatment duration was 8 months, and median follow-up was 15.1 months. In total, 326 patients (94%) discontinued treatment, primarily due to death (41%) or lack of efficacy (22%). Most treatment-related adverse events were of mild to moderate severity (grade 1/2). Mucosal inflammation (reported in 54% of patients), diarrhea (53%), and asthenia (41%) were the most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events. Asthenia (12%), neutropenia (10%), and fatigue and thrombocytopenia (both 9%) were the most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events. In total, 311 patients were included for tumor response, of whom eight (3%) had a complete response and 46 (15%) a partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 17%. Median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 26.7, 12.1, and 16.9 months, respectively.ConclusionThe efficacy and safety profile of sunitinib in patients with mRCC from Latin America was comparable to that in the entire cohort of the global expanded access trial.

Sunitinib Efficacy in Patients with Advanced pNET in Clinical Practice.

Sunitinib treatment leads to improvement in progression-free survival in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs). However, limited data exist regarding the effectiveness, safety and tolerability in clinical practice. We present the results of the first detailed pNET cohort analysis since sunitinib was approved. Patients with advanced, differentiated pNET treated with sunitinib were retrospectively analysed. All patients had progressive disease before start of sunitinib treatment. Twenty-one patients, with a median age of 64 years (range 28-78), were included in this study. Nineteen patients could be analysed for treatment effectiveness. Twelve (57%) patients exhibited either a partial response (1 patient) or stable disease (11 patients) according to the RECIST criteria. The median progression-free survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 3.0-12.0); the probability of being event-free at 6 months was 52.6% (95% CI 28.4-72.1). Potential influencing factors as Ki-67 index, age or duration of disease did not show significant correlations with the response to sunitinib therapy. Considering the differences in patients' characteristics, sunitinib in daily practice showed effectiveness parameters similar to the phase III trial.

Treatment-related deterioration of renal function is associated with the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

ObjectivesSome “on-target” adverse events, such as hypertension and thrombocytopenia, have been reported to predict the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, it is unclear whether the degree of deterioration of renal function resulting from inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway can predict the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether the degree of deterioration of renal function can predict the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with mRCC. Materials and methodsThe present study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with histologically confirmed mRCC who were treated with sunitinib for>3 months between March 2008 and September 2014. The degree of deterioration of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared. ResultsThe study included 62 patients with mRCC. The 62 study patients were divided into the following 2 subgroups according to whether they had a≥10% decrease in the eGFR during sunitinib therapy: Group 1 (≥10% decrease in the eGFR, N = 47 [76%]) and Group 2 (<10% decrease in the eGFR, N = 15 [24%]). PFS was significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 (16mo vs. 6mo, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk group (favorable vs. intermediate, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.7; favorable vs. poor, HR = 14.7, P = 0.05), number of sunitinib courses (HR = 0.64, P<0.0001), baseline eGFR (HR = 0.96, P = 0.0057), and a≥10% decrease in the eGFR (HR = 3.2, P = 0.017) were identified as independent predictors of PFS. In addition, the OS was significantly longer in Group 1 than in Group 2 (not reached vs. 13mo, P = 0.034). In multivariate analysis, a≥10% decrease in the eGFR (HR = 0.98, P = 0.97) was not identified as an independent predictor of OS. ConclusionsThe degree of deterioration of renal function might predict the antitumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with mRCC.

C06 - PET-FDG as a predictor of efficacy of Sunitinib in patients with metastatic GIST, progressing after treatment of Imatinib 400 mg/day

C06 - PET-FDG as a predictor of efficacy of Sunitinib in patients with metastatic GIST, progressing after treatment of Imatinib 400 mg/day

Sunitinib-induced hypertension, neutropaenia and thrombocytopaenia as predictors of good prognosis in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

To evaluate the clinical significance of hypertension (HTN), neutropaenia and thrombocytopaenia as possible new biomarkers of sunitinib efficacy in non-trial patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In all, 181 consecutive patients with mRCC were treated with sunitinib; 39 (22%) received sunitinib 50 mg/day 4 weeks on/2 weeks off, 80 (44%) received 37.5 mg/day continuously and 62 (34%) received 25 mg/day continuously as their starting dose. Treatment-induced adverse events (AEs) and their impact on outcome were analysed on multiple sunitinib doses. During sunitinib treatment 60 patients (33%) developed ≥grade 2 HTN, 88 (49%) ≥grade 2 neutropaenia and 135 (75%) ≥grade 1 thrombocytopaenia. These AEs were associated significantly with longer progression-free survival (PFS; 15.7 vs 6.7; 14.6 vs 6.9; 10.4 vs 4.2 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS; 37.5 vs 16.2; 33.7 vs 13.2; 22.3 vs 13.2 months, respectively, P ≤ 0.008). Although only neutropaenia was associated with a significantly improved PFS and OS in all sunitinib doses, a similar trend was also seen with HTN and thrombocytopaenia in all sunitinib doses. In multivariate analysis, HTN and neutropaenia were significantly associated with PFS and OS and thrombocytopaenia was significantly associated with PFS. In a 12-week landmark analysis, HTN and thrombocytopaenia were significantly associated with PFS and OS. Patients who developed all three AEs (a favourable biomarker profile) had significantly better outcome than patients without these AEs (a poor biomarker profile); response rate 47% vs 4%, median PFS 27.1 vs 3.5 months and OS not reached vs 5.3 months (all P < 0.001). HTN, neutropaenia and thrombocytopaenia were all biomarkers of sunitinib efficacy in patients with mRCC. Our results may help to individualise sunitinib dosing during therapy based on these common sunitinib-related AEs.

Treatment-related deterioration of renal function as a biomarker to predict anti-tumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Treatment-related deterioration of renal function as a biomarker to predict anti-tumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Treatment-related deterioration of renal function as a biomarker to predict antitumor efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

502 Background: Some on-target adverse events such as hypertension or thrombocytopenia have been reported as biomarkers predicting the efficacy of sunitinib as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Decrease of renal function is a major adverse event of sunitinib. However, it remains unclear whether the degree of deterioration of renal function can predict the anti-tumor efficacy of sunitinib. We investigated the relationship between treatment-related deterioration of renal function and anti-tumor efficacy in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of mRCC patients who were treated with sunitinib for more than 3 months. Patients receiving hemodialysis before receiving sunitinib as well as those who did not undergo nephrectomy were excluded from our analysis. Renal function was evaluated by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the MDRD equation modified for Japanese patients. The degree of deterioration in eGFR was compared with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled, the median age was 65 years, and 44 patients (71%) were male. The median baseline eGFR was 49.1 ml/min/1.73m2, and median decrease of eGFR was 9.9 ml/min/1.73m2. Forty-seven patients (76%) had a decreased eGFR of more than 10% compared to baseline values. The patients showing this decrease had significantly longer PFS than those who did not (PFS: 15.5 months vs. 6.1 months, respectively; p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, a decrease in eGFR of more than 10% was a significant independent factor for predicting longer PFS (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.83; p=0.017) as well as MSKCC risk groups and cycles of sunitinib. Conclusions: Treatment-related deterioration of renal function is a biomarker to predict better treatment efficacy for use of sunitinib during first-line therapy for patients with mRCC.

Safety and Efficacy of Sunitinib in Patients from Italy with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Final Results from an Expanded-Access Trial

Objectives: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) received sunitinib in a global expanded-access program (EAP). Here, we report the efficacy and safety results for the EAP subpopulation in Italy. Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with previously treated or treatment-naïve mRCC received oral sunitinib 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule. Tumor measurements were scheduled per local practice (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Safety was regularly assessed. Results: A total of 521 patients participated, including 40% aged ≥65 years, 11% with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 14% with non-clear cell RCC, and 11% with brain metastases. The median treatment duration and posttreatment follow-up were 7.4 and 12.3 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 12%, and the median progression-free and overall survival was 9.1 and 27.2 months, respectively. 514 patients (99%) discontinued treatment; reasons included death (17%), nonresponse (46%), or adverse events (AEs; 13%). The most common any-grade treatment-related AEs were asthenia (44%, plus 15% reporting fatigue), thrombocytopenia and stomatitis (both 37%), diarrhea (36%), mucosal inflammation (29%), hypertension (26%), and dysgeusia (25%). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (10%), asthenia (9%, plus 3% reporting fatigue), neutropenia, stomatitis (both 6%), and hypertension (5%). Conclusion: In a large population of Italian mRCC patients, sunitinib had a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy.

Efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma and renal insufficiency

AimThe aim of this retrospective, registry-based study was to analyse treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib and renal insufficiency (RI). MethodsThe cohort included 790 patients treated with sunitinib between 2006 and 2013. At the start of sunitinib therapy 22, 234, and 534 patients had severe (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <30ml/min/1.73m2), moderate (GFR 30–60ml/min/1.73m2) or mild RI/normal renal function (GFR >60ml/min/1.73m2), respectively. ResultsFor the three groups defined above, median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 5.3months (0.1–18.5), 8.1months (6.2–9.9) and 11.3months (9.4–13.2) (p=0.244), and median overall survival (OS) was 26.3months (1.2–51.4), 21.2months (13.2–29.1) and 26.3months (22.6–29.9) (p=0.443), respectively. The disease control rates were 45.5%, 56.4% and 59.2%, respectively (p=0.374). No unexpected toxicity was reported in the patients with RI, but the treatment was more frequently discontinued because of adverse events and the duration of therapy was significantly shorter in these patients (p=0.007). ConclusionsDuration of first-line targeted treatment for mRCC was significantly shorter for patients with RI, and may have translated into a trend to shorter PFS. These results highlight the need for optimal management of side-effects in patients with mRCC and RI.

Commentary on “Cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with small primary tumours treated with sunitinib or interferon-α.” Tsimafeyeu I, Zart JS, Chung B, Kidney Cancer Research Bureau, Moscow, Russian Federation.: BJU Int 2013; 112(1):32–8. [Epub 2013 Jun 7]. doi: 10.1111/bju.12107.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the role of cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with small primary tumours treated with immuno- or targeted therapy. To assess the efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic RCC with unresected small primary tumours. Patients and methodsThree parallel single-arm prospective studies were conducted. Eligibility criteria were nearly identical for all trials and included: histopathologically confirmed RCC; metastatic measurable disease; size of primary tumour <5cm; good or intermediate prognosis according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model; and no previous therapy. Study 1: Patients were treated with percutaneous cRFA under computed tomography guidance followed by interferon (IFN)-α, 9 MIU, s.c., three times per week. Study 2: Patients received cRFA followed by sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50mg/day orally for 4 weeks, then 2 weeks off treatment. Study 3: Patients with unresected primary RCC received sunitinib alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). ResultsBaseline patient characteristics (age, gender, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, metastatic sites, primary tumour size) were similar in all three studies. Efficacy data for 114 evaluable patients showed an objective response rate of 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5, 10.5) for study 1, 28.9% (95% CI 15.2, 34) for study 2, and 31.6% (95% CI 20.3, 38.9) for study 3. The median (95% CI) PFS times were 9.1 (6.9, 10.2), 13.4 (9.8, 14.4) and 12.7 (11.3, 13.5) months for studies 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Objective response rate was significantly higher and PFS significantly longer in the sunitinib trials than in study 1 (P<0.01 all differences); no differences were found between studies 2 and 3 (objective response rate, P = 0.1; PFS, P = 0.6). Study 1 met its primary endpoint, showing that PFS was significantly longer than the expected 5 months (P = 0.02). The median (95% CI) objective survival (OS) times were greater in study 2 (cRFA/sunitinib) and study 3 (sunitinib-alone) than in study 1 (IFN-α) at 27.2 (22.6, 31.8) and 22.5 (20.7, 24.3) vs 19.5 (16.3, 22.7) months, respectively. Differences were significant (study 1 vs 2, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; P = 0.003; study 1 vs study 3 HR = 0.6, P = 0.01). OS was significantly longer in the cRFA/sunitinib group compared with the sunitinib-alone group (HR = 0.71; P = 0.04). There were no unexpected toxicities of medical treatment or complications of cRFA. ConclusionscRFA is a safe and effective approach for select patients with metastatic RCC treated with immunotherapy. The cRFA technique did not improve PFS in patients treated with sunitinib; cRFA probably has impact on OS in these patients. This needs to be tested in a larger trial. Sunitinib was effective in patients with metastatic RCC with unresected small primary tumours.

Efficacy of sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: initial experience in two Chinese centers

Background The advent of targeted therapy has proved a milestone in the history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatment, and several guidelines now recommend sunitinib as first- or second-line treatment. But little is known about its efficacy in Asian patients. The aim of this article was to evaluate the efficacy of sunitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated at two Chinese centers. Methods One hundred and forty-one patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were included in the study. Of them, 119 patients received single-agent sunitinib as first-line therapy and the remaining 22 patients received it as second-line therapy. One hundred and twenty patients received sunitinib in a dosage of 50 mg orally once daily on a 4-2 schedule (4 weeks on treatment, 2 weeks off), while 21 patients received 37.5 mg/day continuously until either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The overall response rate, survival outcomes, and safety were evaluated. Results Over a median follow-up time of 23 months (16 cycles; range 2-45 months), complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease lasting two cycles or longer were achieved in 2.8%, 24.1%, and 60.3% of patients respectively (objective response rate 26.9%; overall benefit 87.2%). The median progression-free survival was 14.2 months (range 3-39 months). During the study, 53 patients died and the median survival time was 13.5 months (range 7-25 months). Dose modification or treatment interruption due to adverse events was required in 36.9% of the patients. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (71.4%), thrombocytopenia (68.8%), hypertension (47.1%), and fatigue (46.3%). Conclusion Sunitinib had a favorable efficacy/tolerability profile in Chinese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Does gastric acid suppression affect sunitinib efficacy in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer?

Renal cell cancer is a chemotherapy-insensitive cancer treated by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor antagonists. Recently, a question has arisen on whether there is an interaction between tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib, and acid suppressing agents. A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients at two tertiary care centers who received sunitinib between 1 January 2006 and 31 March 2013. Using electronic systems and a province-wide electronic health records database, medication dispensing records were obtained. A univariate Cox's proportional hazard model determined if acid suppression had effects on progression-free survival and overall survival. Of 383 patient charts reviewed, 231 were included in the study. Patients on intermittent acid suppression, lost to follow-up or received sunitinib for less than one week were excluded from the study. The median age of the study population was 65. Patients who received no acid suppression (n = 186) had a median progression-free survival of 23.6 weeks (95% CI, 19.0-31.9 weeks) and patients who received continuous acid suppression (n = 45) had a median progression-free survival of 18.9 weeks (95% CI, 11.0-23.7 p = 0.04). A median overall survival of 62.4 weeks (95% CI, 42.0-82.7 weeks) was observed in the group with no acid suppression, while a median overall survival of 40.9 weeks (95% CI, 26.1-74.4 weeks) was observed in the continuous acid suppression group (p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in progression-free survival and overall survival between the acid suppressed and no acid suppression groups. Further research is required to confirm this potential interaction.