Efficacy Of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Research Articles

Efficacy of sentinel lymph-node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically axilla node-negative patients.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Developments in breast cancer treatment have extended the life expectancy of these patients, raising the issue of morbidity of breast cancer surgery, the major cause of which is axillary dissection. The aim of the present study was to establish the safety of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with a clinically node-negative axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We recorded demographic data, as well as the findings of physical examination, imaging, and pathology before and after NACT. SLNB with indocyanine green + isosulfan blue and axillary dissection were performed and the surgical and pathology findings were recorded. A sentinel lymph node was detected in 80 of 90 patients who underwent surgery. When ≥ three sentinel lymph nodes were removed as negative in the patient group with cN0 after treatment, we evaluated the axilla as being negative with an accuracy of 100%. Axillary lymph-node dissection may not be necessary for patients with cNO confirmed by physical and radiological examination using positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT), and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after NACT, if ≥ three negative SLNB are removed. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer during pregnancy: A comprehensive update.

Pregnant patients diagnosed with breast cancer (PrBC) may receive substantially different treatments compared to general population, considering that certain treatment options cannot be applied during pregnancy due to their potential harmful effects to the foetus. Regarding the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in pregnant patients, potential concerns include foetal harm from radiation exposure, possible teratogenic effects of blue dyes and maternal anaphylaxis to isosulfan. The main objective of the present systematic review is to summarize and present current knowledge and up-to-date evidence about the safety and efficacy of SLNB in PABC. MEDLINE, Google Scholar and UpToDate databases were searched up to 22 January 2023. Articles studying the safety and effectiveness of SLNB in patients for PrBC were eligible for inclusion in the present review. In total, 63 articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Forty-seven articles were strongly in favour of performing SLNB in PABC, 4 articles were partially in favour, 10 articles were strongly against and 2 articles were partially against performing SLNB in PABC. Sub-categorization based on type of study showed that the majority of studies in favour were of higher level of evidence than those against. Furthermore, there were overall 12 studies reporting on outcomes. There were overall 382 women with PrBC that underwent SLNB. Full data were reported for 237 cases. Overall live birth rate was 95.8%, while overall neonatal complication rate was 3.4%. No case of maternal side effects or anaphylactic reaction, maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death was reported (0%). Sentinel lymph node biopsy seems to be safe and effective technique for breast cancer during pregnancy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck mucosal cancers - an update on the current evidence.

Regional metastases are a prominent feature of mucosal-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and are an important prognostic factor. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is one modality that has potential to add to the accuracy of neck staging, although it is currently not used as widely in the head and neck as it is in other areas such as breast cancer. We review the efficacy of SLNB in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinomas and provide an overview of current practice and include details of technical advances.

Clinical utilities and biological characteristics of melanoma sentinel lymph nodes.

An estimated 73870 people will be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States in 2015, resulting in 9940 deaths. The majority of patients with cutaneous melanomas are cured with wide local excision. However, current evidence supports the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) given the 15%-20% of patients who harbor regional node metastasis. More importantly, the presence or absence of nodal micrometastases has been found to be the most important prognostic factor in early-stage melanoma, particularly in intermediate thickness melanoma. This review examines the development of SLNB for melanoma as a means to determine a patient's nodal status, the efficacy of SLNB in patients with melanoma, and the biology of melanoma metastatic to sentinel lymph nodes. Prospective randomized trials have guided the development of practice guidelines for use of SLNB for melanoma and have shown the prognostic value of SLNB. Given the rapidly advancing molecular and surgical technologies, the technical aspects of diagnosis, identification, and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma continues to evolve and to improve. Additionally, there is ongoing research examining both the role of SLNB for specific clinical scenarios and the ways to identify patients who may benefit from completion lymphadenectomy for a positive SLN. Until further data provides sufficient evidence to alter national consensus-based guidelines, SLNB with completion lymphadenectomy remains the standard of care for clinically node-negative patients found to have a positive SLN.

Evaluation of sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard care for cutaneous melanoma but its role in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has not been established. Clinical data was obtained from 54 patients with SCC who received SLNB with the usage of blue dye and radioisotope colloid methods. The positive rate of SLNB in SCC was 7.4%. If the cases were limited to more than T2, the positive rate was 12.9%. Three of 41 patients who was estimated negative LN metastasis by the preoperative tests had micrometastasis (7.3%). Among 13 patients who were suggested to have metastasis in the preoperative tests, only one patient had histological metastasis. One patient with SCC located in the lower lip showed negative SLNB and subsequently developed node recurrence. In conclusion, the efficacy of SLNB in SCC is comparable to that of melanoma in the positive rate. There are two kinds of benefit, avoidance of unnecessary complete lymph node dissection and early detection of metastasis.

Increasing the Efficacy of SLNB in Cases of Malignant Melanoma Located in Close Proximity to the Lymphatic Basin

Background. Being predictive of the entire nodal bed, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is invaluable in the surgical management of melanoma. Although the concept is simple, sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and removal can be technically challenging. Methods. A total of 102 consecutive patients have undergone SLNB in the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Soroka University Medical Center from 2009 to 2012. Patients have undergone SLNB using a radioactive tracer and blue stain in order to identify the SLN. Although SLNB usually precedes the wide excision of melanoma, primary lesions in close proximity (<10 cm) to the lymph basin require wide excision before beginning the SLN quest. Results. All pathology reports confirmed the excision of lymph nodes. Conclusions. When treating MM in close proximity to the lymph basin, changing the sequence of the SLNB procedure seems to increase the efficacy of the method.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and preoperative MRI in the management of patients with pure high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

87 Background: The overall incidence of SLN metastases in pure DCIS is &lt; 1% and the results of SLNB do not usually impact treatment or survival but adds significant surgical morbidity. In addition, there is no evidence regarding the role of preoperative MRI in the management of DCIS. The purpose of our study was to identify the efficacy of SLNB and the benefit of preoperative MRI in high-grade DCIS. Methods: We performed retrospective review of 364 patients with DCIS, identified through our cancer registry database, that were seen from 2003 to 2012 at our institution. Of these, 62 patients were diagnosed with high-grade DCIS (Grade 3 or 2 with comedonecrosis) by core needle biopsy, and underwent SLNB. The remaining 302 patients had either low-grade DCIS or did not have a SLNB. Results: Median age was 56 years (range 33-80). Sixty two patients had high-grade DCIS on definitive excision and 2/62 patients were noted to have small invasive focus of disease. 15/62 (24.19%) patients underwent mastectomy and 47/62(78.1%) underwent lumpectomy. No patient had a positive SLN (0/62). 15/62 (24.2%) patients had breast MRI preoperatively and among them, in 5 (33.3%) patients, MRI findings changed the surgical decision to mastectomy. Among these 5 mastectomy patients, four of them (80%) had pathologically confirmed findings consistent with preoperative MRI suspicions. In lumpectomy patients, close margin of less than 1mm was seen in 4/9 (44.4%) patients with staging MRI and in 24/38 (63.15%) patients without MRI (p = 0.45. Fisher’s exact test). However the positive margin leading to re-excision was seen in 2/9 (22.2%) patients who underwent lumpectomy with staging MRI, and 9/38 (23.6%) patients who underwent lumpectomy without staging MRI. Conclusions: In our study, no patient with high grade DCIS had a positive sentinel node suggesting that routine sentinel node biopsy is not necessary in DCIS patients. The use of MRI changed the surgical planning in 33.3% of patients, but did not improve the surgeon's ability to achieve clear margins.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) in pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC).

1117 Background: SNB in PABC is not often pursued due to concerns for potential fetal harm. There are only limited data available regarding the safety and efficacy of SNB in patients (pts) with PABC. Methods: Pts with PABC who underwent SNB were identified from within an existing multi-institutional PABC cohort diagnosed 1996-2013. Factors evaluated included method and result of SNB evaluation, maternal disease outcome, and fetal outcomes. Results: Within a cohort of 78 PABC pts, 53 had breast surgery while pregnant; 23 (43%) underwent SNB, 27 (51%) underwent initial axillary node (AN) dissection, 18 of whom were clinically node negative, and 3 had no nodal evaluation. Of SNB pts, 21 (91%) had stage 1-2 disease; 14 (61%) had ER/PR+ disease and 7 (30%) HER2+. Eight (35%), 9 (39%), and 6 (26%) women had SNB in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. 99-Technetium-labelled sulfur colloid (99-Tc) alone was used for SNB in 14 pts; methylene blue (MB) dye alone was used in 7. SN was identified in 100% of pts; see Table. There were no SNB-associated complications. At a median of 2.4 years from diagnosis, there were no locoregional recurrences, 3 (13%) distant recurrences, and 1 (4%) death from breast cancer. Among pts who underwent SNB, there were 20 liveborn infants and 3 pregnancies ongoing. Of the 20 infants born, 18 were healthy, 1 unknown, and 1 had cleft palate (in setting of maternal risk factors including smoking and methadone). Conclusions: SNB in PABC appears to be a safe and accurate procedure using either 99-Tc or MB techniques. This is one of the largest experiences reported to date of SNB during PABC; however, numbers remain limited and rates of SNB in our cohort were lower than current rates in non-PABC patients. Additional research and monitoring for safety of this procedure is warranted in women with PABC. [Table: see text]