Efficacy Of Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis Research Articles

P0764STUDY OF 15 CASES OF CHOLESTEROL CRYSTAL EMBOLISM WITH LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN APHERESIS

Abstract Background and Aims Cholesterol crystal embolism (CCE) causes renal damage, and there is a high risk of end-stage renal disease. Corticosteroids, statins and low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) have been used to treat CCE, but the prognosis remains poor and treatment not yet established. This study evaluated the efficacy of LDL-A in patients with CCE. Method We performed a retorospective study of 15 Japanese patients in clinical and histological diagnosis of CCE was made April 2015 to December 2017. 10(67%) patients were diagnosed pathologically on skin biopsy and others were diagnosed clinically. All patients had shown CKD with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 before being diagnosed with CCE. All patients received LDL-A; of these, 13 (87%) also received corticosteroids. The median estimated GFR diagnosis (at baseline) were 13.4 mL/min/1.73m2, and were analyzed stratified into High eGFR group(H) and Low eGFR group(L). Differences in eGFR, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after LDL-A, were compared in these groups. Results High eGFR group was significantly higher than Low eGFR group over all observation periods (at 1 month; H:21.3 ± 8.9 vs L:15.9 ± 5.6, P=0.023, at 3 months; H:25.9 ± 10.3 vs L:15.4 ± 5.4, P=0.035, at 1 year; H:21.7 ± 8.9 vs L:13.2 ± 5.7, P=0.01). In high eGFR group, eGFR was no change during the observation period and no decrease significantly. In Low eGFR group, eGFR increased significantly at 1 month and 3 months compared to baseline (10.5 ± 2.1 at baseline, 15.9 ± 5.6 at 1month, P=0.007, 15.4 ± 5.4 at 3month, P=0.01), but was comparable to baseline at 1 year. Conclusion In this study, introduction of LDL-A may have the effect of maintaining renal function over the long term at 1year regardless of eGFR at diagnosed as CCE.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis Ameliorates Renal Prognosis of Cholesterol Crystal Embolism.

Drugs such as corticosteroids and statins have been used to treat cholesterol crystal embolism (CCE), but the prognosis remains poor. This study evaluated the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) in patients with CCE. Patients with CCE who showed renal deterioration after vascular interventions were studied retrospectively. Information on demographic variables, clinical measurements, and medication use was collected. The outcomes were incidence of maintenance dialysis and mortality at 24 weeks. A total of 49 patients with CCE were included, among whom 37 (76%) were diagnosed pathologically and the remainder were diagnosed clinically. The median estimated GFR at baseline and at diagnosis were 40.5 and 13.4 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) , respectively. Corticosteroids were used in 42 patients (86%), statins in 30 patients (61%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in 29 patients (59%). LDL-A was performed in 25 patients (LDL-A group), and not in 24 patients (control group). Smoking (100% vs. 72%, P = 0.02), white blood cell count (8900/mm(3) vs. 7000/mm(3) ) and corticosteroid use (96% vs. 75%) were higher in the LDL-A group compared with the control group, but there were no differences in other demographic and clinical parameters between the groups. Patients in the LDL-A group had a lower incidence of maintenance dialysis (2/25 (8%) vs. 8/24 (33%), P < 0.05), and a trend towards lower mortality (2/25 (8%) vs. 7/24 (29%), P = 0.074). These results suggest that LDL-A decreases the risk of maintenance dialysis in severe renal CCE patients after vascular interventions.

Immediate therapeutic efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis for drug-resistant nephrotic syndrome: evidence from the short-term results from the POLARIS Study.

Hyperlipidemia is not merely a complication but a major exacerbating factor in longstanding nephrotic syndrome (NS). Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) has been reported to ameliorate dyslipidemia and induce rapid remission of NS. Several clinical studies have suggested the therapeutic efficacy of LDL-A, but the level of clinical evidence is insufficient. Therefore, a multicenter prospective study, POLARIS (Prospective Observational Survey on the Long-Term Effects of LDL Apheresis on Drug-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome), was initiated in Japan. Patients with drug-resistant NS were prospectively recruited into the study and treated with LDL-A in facilities that were registered in advance. In the POLARIS study design, the clinical data are to be followed up for 2 years. In the current study, we aimed at evaluating the short-term efficacy based on the treatment outcome of LDL-A immediately after completion of treatment. Along with rapid improvement of hyperlipidemia, LDL-A significantly improved proteinuria and hypoproteinemia after treatment. More than half of the patients showed remission of NS based on the urinary protein level at the completion of LDL-A. The duration of NS before the start of treatment was significantly shorter in patients who responded to LDL-A. An analysis of patients registered in the POLARIS study indicated that LDL-A has short-term efficacy for drug-resistant NS. Rapid relief of dyslipidemia by LDL-A may provide early remission in about half of the NS patients who are resistant to conventional medication. Completion of the POLARIS study may reveal additional long-term effects of LDL-A in these patients.

A study of the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis at a UK treatment centre

A study of the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis at a UK treatment centre

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis in Childhood for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Untreated pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia usually have myocardial infarctions, heart failure, or death by the teenage years. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis effectively lowers LDL cholesterol in the short term, but there is little published information on the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment in children. An analysis was performed of a registry of all 29 patients who began LDL apheresis before 18 years of age at 15 sites during the 11 years since approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A chart review of 9 patients treated at The Rogosin Institute was also performed to obtain additional details about lipid lowering, adverse events, and cardiovascular status. Of the 29 patients, 20 are currently treated, with a mean age at the start of treatment of 9 +/- 4 years (range 3 to 15) and a mean treatment duration of 6 +/- 4 years (range 2 to 21). The baseline LDL cholesterol (521 +/- 126 mg/dl) is acutely lowered by 75% and chronically lowered by 48% with biweekly sessions. Systemic adverse events have been uncommon. Atherosclerotic disease of the coronary arteries and/or aorta or aortic valve was evident by angiography and/or echocardiography in 12 patients (60%) at baseline and progressed to more severe, symptomatic disease in 6 (30%). In conclusion, LDL apheresis is well tolerated for decades by even very young pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. It effectively lowers LDL cholesterol, but target LDL levels are not achieved, and some patients will show progression of cardiovascular disease.

Efficacy of Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis Treatment

Background: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is effective in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). In the present study, we attempted to determine whether LDL apheresis is effective even for PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis, who tend to be refractory to any treatment, and if so, to determine the mechanism of its efficacy. Methods: Serum levels of lipids and vascular growth factors, leg symptom, and endothelium-dependent vasodilation were investigated before and after 10 sessions of LDL apheresis in 11 PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Results: Serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride exhibited drastic reduction, which completely disappeared 4 weeks after the final apheresis. Resting leg pain was improved in 6 cases even 4 weeks after final apheresis. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was significantly increased 4 weeks after final apheresis (1.6 ± 0.6 to 4.7 ± 1.0%, p < 0.05). Levels of vascular growth factors, hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor were not changed during treatment. Conclusions: These findings suggested that LDL apheresis is effective even in PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Our findings suggest that its mechanisms of efficacy include improvement of vascular endothelial dysfunction, in addition to drastic but acute reduction of lipid levels. Since PAOD patients undergoing hemodialysis tend to be resistant to any treatment and are at high risk for lower-extremity amputation, LDL apheresis could be a useful strategy for treatment of them.

Long-term efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis for focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis

Recently, there have been reports on the efficacy of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis (LDL-A) for focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in pediatric patients. However, there have been few reports on the long-term efficacy of LDL-A for FSGS in such patients. We report here a case of long-term efficacy of LDL-A for FSGS. The patient was a 13-year-old boy with FSGS who presented with steroid-resistant and cyclosporine-resistant nephrotic syndrome and hyperlipidemia. LDL-A was performed 24 times on one year. Following LDL-A, serum concentrations of LDL, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), apoprotein B, and vascular endothelial growth factor significantly decreased, and urinary excretion of protein also decreased. In addition, 3 years after LDL-A, the pathology findings on a second renal biopsy had improved. The patient has been in remission from FSGS for 12 years since LDL-A. These findings suggest that LDL-A may be useful in maintaining long-term remission from pediatric FSGS.

Long-term efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis on coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized by severe hypercholesterolemia and premature coronary heart disease (CHD). The lower the plasma cholesterol level, the more likely it is that CHD can be prevented or retarded; aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapies may be indicated for FH patients with CHD. This study describes the long-term (6 years) safety and efficacy of intensive cholesterol-lowering therapies with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis in heterozygous FH patients with CHD. One hundred thirty heterozygous FH patients with CHD documented by coronary angiography had been treated by cholesterol-lowering drug therapy alone (n = 87) or LDL apheresis combined with cholesterol-lowering drugs (n = 43). Serum lipid levels and outcomes in each treatment group were compared after approximately 6 years. Both treatment groups had significant reductions in serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. LDL apheresis significantly reduced LDL cholesterol levels from 7.42 ± 1.73 to 3.13 ± 0.80 mmol/L (58%) compared with group taking drug therapy, from 6.03 ± 1.32 to 4.32 ± 1.53 mmol/L (28%). With Kaplan-Meier analyses of the coronary events including nonfatal myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, and death from CHD, the rate of total coronary events was 72% lower in the LDL-apheresis group (10%) than in drug therapy group (36%) (p = 0.0088). It is concluded that LDL-apheresis is effective as treatment of CHD in FH heterozygotes, and may become the therapy of choice in severe types of FH.

Treatment of children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: Safety and efficacy of low-density lipoprotein apheresis

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of dextran sulfate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis in the treatment of three children (aged 6, 7, and 10 years) with severe familial homozygous hypercholesterolemia and undetectable LDL receptor activity. A total of 35 double plasma volume procedures were performed. The ranges of the mean decreases of the three patients in plasma lipid concentrations after LDL apheresis (p less than 0.0001) were as follows: total cholesterol, 76% to 79%; LDL-cholesterol, 78% to 81%; very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, 69% to 75%; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 27% to 40%; and triglycerides, 34% to 68%. There were statistically significant but clinically and biologically irrelevant changes in hematologic indexes, serum chemistry values, immunoglobulin levels, complement activity, and plasma concentrations of fat-soluble vitamins. Simple correlation analysis of the variables affecting total cholesterol removal showed significant correlation coefficients (r values) for preapheresis total cholesterol values (r = 0.70; p less than 0.01) and preapheresis LDL-cholesterol values (r = 0.61; p less than 0.01). A multiple regression model explained 82% of the variance based on the preapheresis cholesterol concentration, volume of whole blood processed, and the serum albumin concentration. Side effects of the LDL-apheresis treatments were rare and included abdominal cramping and urticaria. Two procedures were aborted because of intravenous access problems in the younger children. This study confirms that LDL apheresis using a dextran sulfate affinity column is efficacious in rapidly lowering total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations. Furthermore, the procedure is safe and well tolerated by children as young as 6 years of age. This treatment may prevent the progression of atherosclerosis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and may therefore avert early death.