Efficacy Of Levetiracetam Research Articles

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on neurophysiologic abnormalities subtending migraine

AbstractRecent theories about migraine pathogenesis have outlined migraine as a brain disorder. Migraine can be considered an aberrant physiological state with a low threshold for intermittent neuronal excitability. Neurophysiologic findings in migraine emphasized the presence of abnormal neuronal function during the asymptomatic phase, predisposing to attack occurrence, the main patterns being the loss of habituation of evoked and event related potentials and the hypersynchronization of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. These studies confirmed the need of preventive agents able to act on neuronal excitability, with growing evidence in favor of the clinical efficacy of anti‐epileptic drugs (AED), though electrophysiological evidence supporting migraine as a state of neuronal hypoexcitability rendered the rationale of their use and their fundamental action mechanism in preventing migraine rather questionable. In the last years, many studies reported the efficacy of other preventive agents than AED, such as ‐blockers, in reversing neurophysiologic abnormalities of migraine, while reducing headache frequency. Our recent results showed a normalizing effects of levetiracetam and topiramate vs. placebo on the dishabituation pattern of the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the efficacy of levetiracetam vs. both topiramate and placebo in reversing the hypersynchronization of alpha rhythm under flash stimulation. All these effects concurred with the clinical efficacy on migraine frequency, and confirmed the action of AED on the basal mechanisms of migraine. Considering our and previous results, migraine may be considered as a state of “altered” excitability, where the AED are modulating agents able to reverse the electrophysiological patterns predisposing to the attack occurrence. The challenge for the future may be the identification of subgroups of migraine patients with pronounced expression of some neurophysiologic indexes of migraine predisposition, e.g., hypersynchronization, which may optimize the choice of the preventive agent. Drug Dev Res 68:369–375, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

ETO06 Efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) in children with rolandic epilepsy (ROL): a prospective study

ETO06 Efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) in children with rolandic epilepsy (ROL): a prospective study

The SKATE™ study: An open-label community-based study of levetiracetam as add-on therapy for adults with uncontrolled partial epilepsy

The Safety of Keppra as Adjunctive Therapy in Epilepsy (SKATE) study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (Keppra, LEV) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in clinical practice. This Phase IV, 16-week, open-label study recruited patients > or =16-year old with treatment-resistant partial seizures. LEV (1000 mg/day) was added to a stable concomitant antiepileptic drug regimen. LEV dosage was adjusted based on seizure control and tolerability to a maximum of 3000 mg/day. 1541 patients (intent-to-treat population) were recruited including 1346 (87.3%) who completed the study and 77.0% who declared further continuing on LEV after the trial. Overall, 50.5% of patients reported at least one adverse event that was considered related to LEV treatment. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate somnolence, fatigue, dizziness and headache. Serious adverse events considered related to LEV occurred in 1.0% of patients. 7.5% of patients reported adverse events as the most important reason for study drug discontinuation. The median reduction from baseline in the frequency of all seizures was 50.2%; 15.8% of patients were seizure free; 50.1% had seizure frequency reduction of > or =50%. At the end of the study, 60.4% of patients were considered by the investigator to show marked or moderate improvement. There was a significant improvement in health-related quality of life as assessed with the QOLIE-10-P (total score increasing from 55.6 to 61.6; p<0.001). This community-based study suggests that LEV is well tolerated and effective as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults. These data provide supportive evidence for the safety and efficacy of LEV demonstrated in the pivotal Phase III placebo-controlled studies.

An open-label trial of levetiracetam in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy

To conduct an open-label, add-on trial on safety and efficacy of levetiracetam in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI). SMEI patients were recruited from different centers according to the following criteria: age > or =3 years; at least four tonic-clonic seizures/month during the last 8 weeks; previous use of at least two drugs. Levetiracetam was orally administrated at starting dose of approximately 10 mg/kg/day up to 50 to 60 mg/kg/day in two doses. Treatment period included a 5- to 6-week up-titration phase and a 12-week evaluation phase. Efficacy variables were responder rate by seizure type and reduction of the mean number per week of each seizure type. Analysis was performed using Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests. Twenty-eight patients (mean age: 9.4 +/- 5.6 years) entered the study. Sixteen (57.1%) showed SCN1A mutations. Mean number of concomitant drugs was 2.5. Mean levetiracetam dose achieved was 2,016 mg/day. Twenty-three (82.1%) completed the trial. Responders were 64.2% for tonic-clonic, 60% for myoclonic, 60% for focal, and 44.4% for absence seizures. Number per week of tonic-clonic (median: 3 vs 1; p = 0.0001), myoclonic (median: 21 vs 3; p = 0.002), and focal seizures (median: 7.5 vs 3; p = 0.031) was significantly decreased compared to baseline. Levetiracetam effect was not related to age at onset and duration of epilepsy, genetic status, and concomitant therapy. Levetiracetam was well tolerated by subjects who completed the study. To date, follow-up ranges 6 to 36 months (mean, 16.2 +/- 13.4). Levetiracetam add-on is effective and well tolerated in severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy. Placebo-controlled studies should confirm these findings.

Levetiracetam attenuates spontaneous spike-and-wave discharges in DBA/2J mice

Recent evidence highlights levetiracetam (LEV) as an advantageous treatment of absence epilepsy (AE). Thus, we investigated the effects of this drug in DBA/2J mice, a murine model of AE. Similarly to ethosuximide (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p.) and sodium valproate (250 mg/kg, i.p.), two classic antiabsence agents, LEV (50-200 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced the occurrence of spike-and-wave discharges, AE's typical electroencephalographic patterns. Our results confirm LEV's efficacy in AE treatment.

Levetiracetam for the treatment of hot flashes: A pilot study

9116 Background: Hot flashes affect 75 % to 90 % of women transitioning to menopause and are a major cause of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Levetiracetam, a popular anticonvulsant, is a centrally active agent that anecdotally appeared to reduce hot flashes in clinical practice. This phase II trial sought to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam in reducing hot flashes among women with a history of breast cancer or women who did not wish to take estrogen therapy for fear of an increased risk of breast cancer. Methods: Women who were experiencing bothersome hot flashes (≥ 14 times per week, for ≥ 1 month) were eligible. A single arm pilot study design based on previous work was used with a planned sample size of 30 patients. The patients did not receive any study medication during the first week (baseline week). At the beginning of the second week, patients were started on levetiracetam (500 mg), and were to increase the dose by 500 mg each week to a goal of 1,000 mg twice daily. Hot flash diaries were completed daily. The primary endpoint was hot flash score (frequency times average severity). The change from week 1 (baseline) to week 5, the last treatment week, was analyzed by paired t-test and related Wilcoxon procedures. Results: A total of 30 women were enrolled onto this study in eight months. All patients were eligible. 19 women completed all 4 weeks of the study treatment and provided complete data. After treatment with levetiracetam for 4 weeks, mean hot flash scores were reduced by 57% (95% CI 39%-75%), while mean hot flash frequencies were reduced by 53% (95% CI 38%-68%), reductions being greater than what would be expected with a placebo. There were significant improvements, compared to baseline week data, in sweating, hot flash distress, and satisfaction with hot flash control. Eight subjects stopped the study drug due to treatment related adverse events (grade I/II), with the most frequently reported being somnolence, fatigue and dizziness. Conclusions: While levetiracetam appears to be a promising therapy for the treatment of hot flashes, further study is needed to better substantiate the toxicity and efficacy of this drug before it can be more definitively recommended for use in clinical practice. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An open trial of levetiracetam for segmental and generalized dystonia

Local botulinum toxin injections represent the treatment of choice for most patients with focal dystonia. However, patients with segmental or generalized forms require additional pharmacologic treatment which is often ineffective or limited by intolerable side-effects. An animal study and three case reports suggested antidystonic effects of levetiracetam, a pyrrolidone derivate, whereas a recent open-label study found no improvement in 10 patients with primary idiopathic cervical dystonia. We studied the efficacy of levetiracetam in a daily dose of 3000 mg in 10 consecutive patients with otherwise therapy refractory segmental or generalized dystonia. At 4-week follow-up, none of the patients showed improvement of dystonia, mild side-effects were observed in 3 patients.

Levetiracetam is as effective as carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy

Evaluation of: Brodie MJ, Perucca E, Ryvlin P, Ben-Menachem E, Meencke HJ. Comparison of levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology 6, 402–408 (2007) (1).Despite the emergence of multiple antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the past decade, the task of choosing the right drug for monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy remains a precarious task. This is especially true when trying to choose a new AED over a more traditional agent. Much of this uncertainty stems from the fact that there are only a handful of studies that are able to demonstrate efficacy of a new drug over an older AED. While the newer drugs appear more favorable because of better tolerability, safety profiles and simple pharmacokinetics, many do not have an indication for monotherapy. Of course, this is further contingent upon the stringent limitations placed by regulatory bodies, such as the US FDA, who govern approval of AEDs for monotherapy. The current randomized study attempts to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam in monotherapy compared with controlled-release carbamazepine, a gold standard in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in infants and young children with refractory epilepsy

The aim of this multicentric, retrospective, and uncontrolled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) in 81 children younger than 4 years with refractory epilepsy. At an average follow-up period of 9 months, LEV administration was found to be effective in 30% of patients (responders showing more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency) of whom 10 (12%) became seizure free. This efficacy was observed for focal (46%) as well as for generalized seizures (42%). In addition, in a group of 48 patients, we compared the initial efficacy (evaluated at an average of 3 months of follow-up) and the retention at a mean of 12 months of LEV, with regard to loss of efficacy (defined as the return to the baseline seizure frequency). Twenty-two patients (46%) were initial responders. After a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, 9 of 48 patients (19%) maintained the improvement, 4 (8%) of whom remained seizure free. A loss of efficacy was observed in 13 of the initial responders (59%). Maintained LEV efficacy was noted in patients with focal epilepsy and West syndrome. LEV was well tolerated. Adverse events were seen in 18 (34%) patients. The main side effects were drowsiness and nervousness. Adverse events were either tolerable or resolved in time with dosage reduction or discontinuation of the drug. We conclude that LEV is safe and effective for a wide range of epileptic seizures and epilepsy syndromes and, therefore, represents a valid therapeutic option in infants and young children affected by epilepsy.

Levetiracetam in the Prophylaxis of Migraine With Aura

To evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam as prophylactic treatment for migraine with aura with high frequency of attacks. Migraine with aura with high frequency of attacks could represent a very demanding therapeutic problem. Efficacy of the antiepileptic drug, lamotrigine, has been reported in this form of migraine. Levetiracetam is a new antiepileptic drug with an excellent tolerability profile. Mechanisms of action of this drug remain largely unknown, but recently, it has been shown to exert inhibitory effects on neuronal-type calcium channels. We performed a small open-label trial treating 16 patients affected by migraine with aura with high frequency of attacks. After a 1-month run-in period, patients were treated with levetiracetam at a dosage of 1000 mg/d for 6 months. The number of attacks per month was significantly reduced during the first month (compared with run-in; P < 0.001), and it was reduced further during the second (second month vs first month; P < 0.001) and the third months (third month vs second month; P < 0.001) of the treatment. This improvement persisted unchanged for the remaining 3 months of treatment. In 7 (44%) of the 16 patients, the attacks were completely abolished after 3 months of treatment. Severity of headache and duration of headache and aura were also significantly reduced at the third and sixth months of treatment (P < 0.001). Levetiracetam was well tolerated (6 patients complained of slight dizziness, nervousness, and somnolence). Levetiracetam seems to be a safe and effective treatment for migraine with aura. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the observed results.

Safety and Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Patients With Panic Disorder

To examine the safety and efficacy of the anticonvulsant levetiracetam in the treatment of patients with panic disorder. In an open-label, fixed-flexible dose study, 18 patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (DSM-IV diagnostic criteria) were treated with levetiracetam for 12 weeks. Outcome was assessed with standard rating instruments (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale [CGI-S], Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale [CGI-I], and the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety [HAM-A]) and by the number of panic attacks during the previous week. The study was conducted in 2 outpatient clinics in New York City from January 2004 through July 2005. Of the 13 patients completing the study, 11 were rated "very much" or "much" improved on the CGI-I. Panic attack frequency, anxiety (HAM-A), and global severity (CGI-S) ratings also demonstrated significant improvement (all p < .00). For most patients, clinical benefits were apparent after only 1 to 2 weeks of treatment. Levetiracetam was well tolerated with minimal side effects. Given its favorable pharmacokinetics, side effect profile, and, if confirmed, early onset of action and efficacy, levetiracetam might represent significant progress in the pharmacologic management of panic disorder.

Efficacy of levetiracetam in the treatment of children with BECTS. A prospective, open-label pilot trial prior to a controlled, randomised, double-blind German multicentre trial (HEAD-Study)

Efficacy of levetiracetam in the treatment of children with BECTS. A prospective, open-label pilot trial prior to a controlled, randomised, double-blind German multicentre trial (HEAD-Study)

Open‐label pilot study of levetiracetam (Keppra) for the treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease

The objective of this study is to evaluate the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) in reducing chorea in Huntington's disease (HD) patients in a prospective open-label pilot study. Nine HD patients with chorea were treated with LEV in doses up to 3,000 mg/day for up to 48 days. The primary endpoint measure was the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) chorea subscore. The mean dose (+/-SD) of LEV at endpoint was 2,583.3 +/- 1,020.6 mg/day. Mean UHDRS chorea score decreased from 12.6 +/- 3.0 at baseline to 6.7 +/- 4.3 at endpoint (P = 0.01). There was no significant change in UHDRS total motor scores (38.8 +/- 11.4 at baseline and 33.6 +/- 26.7 at endpoint; P = 0.24). Somnolence contributed to a 33% drop-out rate, and 3 patients developed Parkinsonism. Results of this open label study suggest that LEV may be efficacious in reducing chorea in HD patients.

Assessment of a dose–response relationship of levetiracetam

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between levetiracetam dose and both efficacy and safety in adult patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Dose-response relationships for levetiracetam efficacy were evaluated using pooled data from three trials including adults with refractory partial epilepsy. Two were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials in which doses of 1000-3000 mg/day of levetiracetam were administered as adjunctive therapy. The third consisted of the two parts of a crossover randomized, double-blind study in which levetiracetam (1000 or 2000 mg/day) or placebo was added to ongoing therapy. Data from each part of the crossover trial were included as if it was an independent parallel-group study. A fourth randomized double-blind trial was added for the safety evaluation. It included data from adults receiving placebo or 2000 mg/day of levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures. The combined analysis showed an increasing effect with increasing dose. The responder rates (> or = 50% reduction in seizures) for placebo and levetiracetam 1000, 2000, and 3000 mg/day were 13.1%, 28.5%, 34.3%, and 41.3%, respectively. The respective values for seizure freedom were 0.8%, 4.7%, 6.3%, and 8.6%. There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship with regard to adverse events, including those (asthenia, dizziness, somnolence) most commonly associated with this antiepileptic drug. Patients who do not become seizure-free at the lowest recommended levetiracetam dose (1000 mg/day) should be titrated to 2000 or 3000 mg/day to provide the greatest opportunity for efficacy with little or no increased risk for adverse events.

Long-term levetiracetam treatment of epilepsy patients: Clinical audit

Purpose The long-term efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) was analysed in 218 epilepsy patients. One hundred and ninety-nine patients were treated for at least 6 months. We evaluated LEV efficacy for all types of seizures together, and for simple partial, complex partial and secondary generalized seizures individually. Results A significant decrease in the number of seizures occurred after 6 months of treatment ( p < 0.001). Mean seizure frequency (irrespective of type) before LEV was 19.2 a month. The mean monthly frequency at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months dropped to 12.7, 10.5, 9.7 and 7.1 seizures a month, respectively. The mean percentage reduction in seizures at these times was 45.7, 52.1, 59.1 and 64.2% and the number of responding patients was 51.3, 54.2, 59.8 and 62.2%. The number of patients completely seizure free was 18.6, 16.7, 15.2 and 16.2%. We found similar results in the last three categories for partial simple, complex and secondary generalized seizures individually. Side effects in 18.3% of patients caused treatment discontinuation in 6.4%. The most frequent were somnolence, moodiness and dizziness. The retention rate at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months was 0.848, 0.72, 0.62 and 0.5, respectively. Conclusions LEV is effective and well tolerated for long-term treatment of epilepsy.

Levetiracetam therapy in patients with brain tumour and epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common clinical problem in patients with brain tumours, strongly affecting patients' quality of life. Tumour-related seizures are often difficult to control, and the clinical picture is complicated by frequent interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and antineoplastic agents. We studied the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV), a new AED with a different pharmacological profile from traditional anticonvulsants, in 19 patients (6 females; age range 28-70 years, mean 48 years) with supratentorial gliomas and epilepsy. Seizure types were simple partial in four patients, complex partial in 4, complex partial with secondary generalization in 7, and generalized tonic-clonic in 4. LEV was added to the existing AED treatment on account of persisting seizures, and titrated at dosages of 1,000-3,000 mg/day. Patients were seen at the Outpatient's Centre every 1-3 months, and followed-up for 7-50 months (mean 25 months, median 20 months). At the end of the observation period, nine patients were seizure free (seizure free period ranging from 7 to 33 months, mean 16, median 12) and five patients reported an improvement in seizure-frequency from daily to weekly (n=1) or from weekly to monthly (n=3). Seizure frequency was unmodified in four patients and increased (from monthly to weekly) in one. No LEV-related adverse effects were observed. LEV plasma concentrations monitored in 12 subjects ranged from 11.9 to 82.1 microg/ml. Our preliminary open data indicate that add-on treatment with LEV in patients with brain tumours is safe and appears to be effective in reducing seizure frequency. Controlled studies on larger populations are warranted to confirm these open observations.

Levetiracetam in a broad population of patients with refractory epilepsy: interim results of the international SKATE trial

To prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam in patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy, in a common practice-based setting. In this phase IV, open-label, 16-week community-based study, adult patients with focal seizures initially received levetiracetam 1,000 mg/day. Throughout the study, the dose was adjusted in increments of 1,000 mg (maximum 3,000 mg/day) to achieve seizure control and maintain tolerability. The outcome parameters were the percentage reduction in partial and total seizure frequency per week from historical baseline, global evaluation scale (GES), and adverse events (AE). Seven hundred and thirty-one patients were included in this analysis and 84.4% completed the study. The median percent reduction in all seizures was 47.8%, and 49.3% for all partial seizures. The 50% responder rate was 49%, and the seizure-free rate was 17.2% for all partial seizures. Approximately 60% of patients showed moderate to marked improvement on the GES. The majority of AE were of mild to moderate severity; the most commonly reported being asthenia, somnolence, headache, and dizziness. Levetiracetam is both efficacious and safe as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy treated by clinicians in their daily practice.

Evidence for a rapid action of levetiracetam compared to topiramate in refractory partial epilepsy

The objective of this observational study was to compare the efficacy of levetiracetam and topiramate during the first 15 days of add-on treatment in adults with refractory partial epilepsy. Two cohorts of patients with > or =3 simple or complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalisation per month over an 8-week baseline period received levetiracetam or topiramate in two distinct phases, in addition to standard antiepileptic treatment. During the first 15 days of the therapy, levetiracetam was added at the dosage of 250 mg b.i.d. or topiramate at 25mg o.i.d. Efficacy parameters included number of seizure-free days (SFDs), mean and percent reduction in seizure frequency (in general and by type), and number of seizure-free patients in the first 15 days of treatment compared to last 15 days of the baseline period. Sixty-one patients received levetiracetam and 61 topiramate. The general characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. The total number of SFDs during 15 days before treatment was 637 with levetiracetam and 621 with topiramate; in the 15-day evaluation period the SFDs increased to 748 (17.4%) and 668 (7.6%), respectively (ANOVA, p<0.05). Twenty-six patients (42.6%) taking levetiracetam were seizure free compared to 10 (16.4%) receiving topiramate (chi-square, p=0.003). This open-label non-controlled study suggests an early efficacy of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy: these results appear to confirm previous indications of a rapid onset of action and seem to suggest first evaluation of the patient at the dose of 500 mg/day before increasing to the considered minimum standard dose of 1000 mg/day, as some patients could respond to the starting dose.

Levetiracetam Efficacy in Epileptic Syndromes with Continuous Spikes and Waves during Slow Sleep: Experience in 12 Cases

To assess the add-on efficacy of levetiracetam on the EEG, behavior, and cognition of children with continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep (CSWS). Charts of children with behavioral and/or cognitive deterioration associated with CSWS who received levetiracetam at 50 mg/kg/day as add-on treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Awake and sleep EEG recordings and detailed neuropsychological and behavioral assessments were available at baseline and 2 months after levetiracetam initiation. In children showing clinical and/or electrophysiological improvement after 2 months, levetiracetam was continued with a new evaluation at 1 year. Twelve patients were included (9 cryptogenic and 3 symptomatic cases). Seven patients (58.3%) showed improvement of EEG record. Among these seven patients, neuropsychological evaluation was improved in three, and in the other four patients, not testable because of severe cognitive impairment, behavior was improved. Two patients improved in neuropsychological evaluation despite the lack of EEG improvement. Eight patients (66.6%) continued levetiracetam treatment after 2 months. After 1 year, four patients were still on levetiracetam, two because sustained effect on EEG and behavior and the two others because improvement in neuropsychological testing despite unchanged EEG. Levetiracetam was discontinued in the other four patients because of neuropsychological or behavioral deterioration associated with CSWS pattern, between 9 and 11 months after treatment initiation. This retrospective study suggests that levetiracetam has a positive effect on the EEG, the behavior, and the cognition of patients with epilepsy and CSWS. Additional studies are warranted in order to assess the place of this drug in these epileptic conditions.

Clinical analysis in familial cortical myoclonic tremor allows differential diagnosis with essential tremor

Familial cortical myoclonic tremor (FCMT) is a rare disorder often leading to a wrong clinical diagnosis of essential tremor. Electrophysiological data are usually considered to allow a correct diagnosis. We describe a FCMT French family with previously unreported clinical features such as sensitivity to glucose deprivation, vibration, repetitive visual patterns, and intense visual or auditory stimulation and contrasts. Electrophysiological studies of the propositus confirm the cortical reflex myoclonus elicited by photic stimulation and the absence of epileptic electroencephalographic discharges. We emphasize that a precise clinical analysis can lead to a correct diagnosis before electrophysiological confirmation. This is also the first-ever report of efficacy of levetiracetam in FCMT.