Efficacy Of Esketamine Research Articles

Optimizing esketamine administration for postoperative depression: a comprehensive study on laparoscopic bariatric surgery patients.

Previous studies have reported conflicting findings regarding the efficacy of esketamine in managing postoperative depression. While the positive effects of subanesthetic doses esketamine have been observed in treatment-resistant depression, the response to this medication in patients experiencing depression following surgery has not been consistent. Building upon the known impact of anesthesia on brain function, we have formulated a hypothesis suggesting that the timing of esketamine administration in relation to anesthesia may significantly affect its efficacy in managing postoperative depression. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of esketamine administered at different time points before and after anesthesia. Our randomized, double-blind, controlled study involved 120 patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, randomly divided into three groups. Group Post- ESK received an intravenous injection of esketamine at a dose of 0.2mg/kg after anesthesia induction. Group Pre- ESK received the same esketamine dosage 2h prior to anesthesia induction. Group Placebo served as the control group and received a 0.9% saline solution after induction. The primary outcome measures of the study were depression scores as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels. On the first postoperative day, the PHQ-9 scores, incidence and severity of postoperative depression in the Pre-ESK group were significantly lower than those in the Post-ESK and placebo groups (P < 0.05). Additionally, plasma BDNF levels in the Pre-ESK group were significantly higher than those in the Post-ESK and placebo groups (P < 0.05). Notably, there was a negative correlation between PHQ-9 scores and plasma BDNF levels. Our study supports the potential for subanesthetic dose esketamine to alleviate postoperative depression symptoms following laparoscopic bariatric surgery, and anesthetic drugs have a significant effect on its efficacy. The use of subanesthetic dose esketamine after anesthesia does not improve postoperative depression symptoms in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, while the use of sub-anesthetic dose esketamine before anesthesia can improve postoperative depression symptoms.

Efficacy of Esketamine among patients with treatment resistant depression in a ‘real world' health-care setting in Israel

One in five people will likely suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD) during their life. Thirty percent of those with MDD will experience Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), which is characterized by a failure to respond to two adequately administered trials of antidepressants. Esketamine is a rapidly acting intranasal antidepressant. Present-day Esketamine research has limited data in real-world populations. This study aimed to assess Esketamine treatment in a real-world community-based population.This naturalistic retrospective study included 94 individuals age 18 and above diagnosed with TRD, treated with Esketamine in an outpatient setting. The treatment was given in a single clinic, from January 2021 to January 2023, following approval of the Institutional Internal Review Board. The treatment included an acute phase (biweekly treatment, continuing 4–8 weeks), followed by a maintenance phase (once a week to once a month, for 6–12 months). Dosing ranged from 28 mg to 84 mg. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively gathered. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, at baseline and during each treatment phase.All patients completed the acute phase. About 60% completed the maintenance phase. Linear improvement of depressive symptoms was revealed in both phases. A sub-analysis of patients with comorbid personality disorder revealed a similar improvement pattern in the acute phase with milder improvement during the maintenance phase, compared to the other patients.This study supports the use of Esketamine for TRD, including patients with comorbid personality disorder and previous electroconvulsive therapy.

Efficacy of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia with Esketamine for Herpes Zoster Associated with Breakthrough Pain

BACKGROUND: Some patients with herpes zoster (HZ) experience an intermittent spontaneous, short-lived and severe pain, which is called breakthrough pain (BTP). The effect of analgesic drugs and invasive procedures is not significant. Therefore, treatment of HZ associated with BTP is challenging. Esketamine is a new N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, with enhanced analgesic effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with low-dose esketamine for HZ associated with BTP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of PCIA with low-dose esketamine for HZ associated with BTP. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study. SETTING: The study was carried out in the Pain Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University in Jiaxing, China. METHODS: The clinical data of HZ associated with BTP treated by PCIA with low-dose esketamine at the Pain Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, between October 2015 to October 2021, were collected retrospectively. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores of rest pain (RP) and BTP, frequency of BTP, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were recorded and analyzed before treatment (T0) and on days one (T1) and 3 (T2), week one (T3), months one (T4), 3 (T5), and 6 (T6) after treatment. Adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients treated by PCIA with low-dose esketamine were included finally. Compared with T0, the NRS-11 scores of RP at T2, T3, T4, T5, and T6 decreased significantly (P &lt; 0.05). The NRS-11 score of RP at T4 was significantly lower than that of T3 (P &lt; 0.001), but there was no statistical difference between T5 and T4 (P &gt; 0.05), the efficacy of esketamine in the treatment of RP was stable at one month after treatment. Likewise, compared with T0, the NRS-11 scores of BTP, frequency of BTP, and PSQI score decreased significantly at each time point after treatment (P &lt; 0.05). These at T5 were significantly lower than T4 (P &lt; 0.05), but there was no statistical difference between T6 and T5 (P &gt; 0.05), the efficacy of esketamine was stable at 3 months after treatment. FBG also decreased significantly at each time point after treatment (P &lt; 0.05), it tended to be normal and stable one month after treatment. All patients had mild symptoms of dizziness during treatment, and though a slight increase in noninvasive blood pressure (BP) was noted in all, the elevated BP did not exceed 30% of the baseline value. Four patients (16%) developed nausea without vomiting. There were no serious adverse reactions, such as respiratory depression. LIMITATIONS: The nonrandomized, single-center, small sample size, retrospective design is a major limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS: PCIA with low-dose esketamine has a significant and long-term effect in the treatment of HZ associated with BTP. The RP was controlled, and the degree and frequency of BTP were significantly reduced after treatment, leading to improved quality of life. There were no serious adverse reactions worthy of clinical promotion. KEY WORDS: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, esketamine, herpes zoster, breakthrough pain

The safety and efficacy of esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: A randomized, controlled and prospective clinical trial.

Background and Purpose: Data and high-quality studies of anesthetic methods for children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who undergo drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) are limited. Research on pediatric DISE using esketamine has never been reported before. To test the safety and efficacy of esketamine during DISE in children with OSAHS, we compare esketamine (Group K) with dexmedetomidine (Group D) in this study. Methods: 100 children with ASA Ⅰ∼Ⅱ grade, prepared for an elective adenotonsillectomy under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups. Midazolam 0.1mg/kg was administered intravenously for both groups. In Group D a 1μg/kg bolus of dexmedetomidine was given over 10min followed by the infusion rate 1μg/kg/hr to the end of DISE. Group K received a 1.0mg/kg IV bolus of esketamine over 10s followed by the infusion rate 1mg/kg/hr to the end of DISE. Results: Group K had a higher percentage of success than Group D (p = 0.008). The onset time of Group K was shorter than that of Group D (p = 0.000). The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score of Group K was higher than that of Group D (p = 0.005). The risk of adverse effects (AEs) was lower in Group K (p = 0.000). In Group D, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR) all decreased, while in Group K, SBP, DBP, and HR hardly changed. Conclusion: Esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine provides more effective and safer depth of anesthesia for OSAHS pediatric DISE by ensuring short onset time, deep sedation, and few AEs. Clinical Trial Registration: ClincalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04877639.

Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Esketamine in the Treatment of Suicidality in Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression.

Affective disorders account for most cases of suicide. The pharmacological arsenal to treat suicidality is limited and available agents take too long to take effect. A large body of evidence shows optimal results of ketamine for treating depression, but the evidence concerning suicidality has not been fully described. We report the first real-world study of severely depressed patients presenting with suicide ideation who were treated with repeated administration of subcutaneous esketamine. We analyzed data from 70 acutely depressed subjects diagnosed with resistant major depressive disorder or bipolar depression. Subjects were administered subcutaneous esketamine once a week for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, the change from baseline to 24-h post-administration 6 in the item 10 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score, was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated-measures model. There were significant effects for time on item 10 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores (p < 0.0001) but not for a time × diagnosis interaction (p = 0.164) from baseline to the end of the study. Efficacy of esketamine did not differ between groups (major depressive disorder vs bipolar depression) at any timepoint. Statistical significance on suicidality scores was observed from 24 h after the first administration (p < 0.001), and a further reduction was observed with repeated administrations. Esketamine was safe and well tolerated. Mean heart rate remained stable during the administrations and the blood pressure increase was self-limited. Repeated subcutaneous esketamine administration had significant anti-suicidality effects in both major depressive disorder and bipolar groups, with a rapid onset of action and a good tolerability profile. Large randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.

Esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression: the real-world experience in the French cohort early-access programme

Objective To present the first real-world data of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with esketamine through a French cohort Temporary Authorisation for Use (ATUc) programme. Methods In 2019, the French Health Authorities exceptionally granted the first ATUc in psychiatry for TRD patients. Clinical characteristics, safety and efficacy data were reported by physicians. The ATUc ended ∼6 months after initiation. Results The cohort (n = 66; median age 53.0 years; 62.1% female; 78.8% with severe major depressive episodes; resistance to a mean of 4.2 previous antidepressants) received esketamine treatment for a median of 30 days. Among 46 analysed patients, 22 (47.8%) achieved response (Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score reduction ≥50.0%) and 17 (37.0%) achieved remission (MADRS total score of ≤12) at least once at a median of 18.5 (2.0–77.0) and 21.0 (2.0–46.0) days after initiation, respectively. By Week 4, patients had a 31.6% probability of achieving remission (Kaplan–Meier method). Sedation, somnolence, dizziness, hypertension, anxiety and dissociation were the most frequently reported (>10.0%) adverse events. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions Patient characteristics of this cohort demonstrate high-level treatment resistance. The safety and efficacy of esketamine in patients with TRD in real‐world clinical practice were consistent with Phase 3 trials. Key points Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) exceptionally received esketamine nasal spray ahead of its launch through a French cohort Temporary Authorisation for Use (ATUc) programme. The clinical characteristics of 66 adult patients with TRD included in this cohort demonstrated a high-level of resistance to conventional treatments at the time of treatment request prior to esketamine initiation. No new safety signals were observed with esketamine initiation during the ATUc period compared with the Phase 3 clinical trials. The safety and efficacy of esketamine in the real world remain consistent with that established in Phase 3 clinical trials. The data collected during this ATUc also provide the first real-world data on the management and practical use of esketamine in a hospital setting in France.