Efficacy Of Dolasetron Research Articles

Dexamethasone enhances the efficacy of dolasetron and haloperidol for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Dexamethasone enhances the efficacy of dolasetron and haloperidol for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting

Relative efficacy of various 5- hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists in the prevention and control of acute nausea and vomiting associated with platinum-based chemotherapy

8623 Background: The introduction of 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor (5-HT3) antagonists has represented a significant clinical advance in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), particularly for patients receiving highly emetogenic platinum-based regimens. However no study to date has compared the relative efficacy of Dolasetron, Granisetron, Ondansetron and Palonosetron with Dexamethasone in the prevention and control of acute CINV in patients undergoing platinum-based therapy. Methods: Retrospective data were reviewed for 207 consecutive patients receiving Platinum-based chemotherapy in our infusion center between November 1999 and August 2005. Patients receiving 5-HT3 antagonists without Dexamethasone (n=11) were not eligible for the study. Further 15 patients were excluded because of no documentation of CINV. The remaining 181 patients constitute the subject of this study. Patient characteristics including age, sex, race, diagnosis, history of heavy alcohol intake, chemotherapy regimen administered, number of cycles, and performance status at the start of therapy were noted. Primary outcome measure was complete control of acute CINV. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2.0 was used to assess toxicity. Results: The 181 patients received 572 cycles of platinum-based therapy. Dolasetron (n=157), Granisetron (n=81), Ondansetron (n=131) and Palonosetron (n=203) (each given with Dexamethasone) achieved complete control of vomiting in 89.8%, 95.5%, 92.3% and 88.1% (ρ=0.86) of cycles respectively. Respectively, complete nausea control was observed in 68.1%, 75.3%, 69.4% and 73.3% (ρ=0.35). DEX 20 mg was not superior to 10mg in complete control of nausea and vomiting (ρ=0.06 and ρ=0.67 respectively). Similarly complete control of nausea and vomiting (ρ=0.12 and ρ=0.10 respectively) was not significantly different in patients getting cisplatin compared to carboplatin based regimens. Conclusion: This study does not demonstrate a significant difference in the efficacy of the four 5-HT3 antagonists in controlling acute CINV. The higher dose of Dexamethasone confers no added benefit over the lower 10mg dose. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Dolasetron reduces pain on injection of propofol

Pain on injection is a well known side-effect of propofol. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of dolasetron, a 5-HT 3 -antagonist, in prophylaxis of pain on injection of propofol compared with lidocaine and placebo. Prospective, randomised, double-blinded study including 150 patients randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A received 12.5 mg dolasetron, group B 40 mg lidocaine and group C saline 0.9 % as placebo. After occluding the venous drainage the test medication was given. The occlusion was released after 1 min and 2.0 mg/kg Propofol was administered over a period of 30 sec. The patients were asked whether they felt any pain during the administration. Pain on injection was judged by using a four-point scale. Incidence of pain on injection as well as the severity of pain was significantly reduced by lidocaine (62 % pain free) compared with placebo (28 %). Severity, but not incidence of pain on injection was significantly reduced by dolasetron (50 %) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between dolasetron and lidocaine. Dolasetron and lidocaine were effective in preventing pain of injection secondary to propofol.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide

Selective 5-HT3 antagonists have proven to be safe and effective for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Dolasetron is a new highly selective addition to this class of antiemetics that has been shown to have significant antiemetic activity in patients receiving cisplatin-containing regimens. This pilot study was designed to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of dolasetron in cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide. This study used an open-label, non-randomized design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous dolasetron in the prevention of emesis in patients receiving doxorubicin (25-75 mg/m2) and/or cyclophosphamide (400-1200 mg/m2). Sixty-nine patients received a single, intravenous dose of dolasetron over 15-20 min beginning 30 min prior to the start of chemotherapy. Dose levels of dolasetron studied were: 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4 mg/kg. Patients were monitored for emesis, nausea and adverse events for 24h after the start of chemotherapy. Overall, 61% of patients experienced complete control of emesis. No significant trend towards increased antiemetic efficacy (P = 0.076) or nausea control with increasing dolasetron dose was noted, although the power to detect significant differences was limited by the small number of patients on the 0.3-mg/kg and 2.4-mg/kg dose levels. Age, gender, and type of chemotherapy were significant predictors of complete antiemetic control. Adverse events were generally mild and included headache, chills, lightheadedness, fever, diarrhea, dizziness, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Intravenous dolasetron is safe and effective in the prevention of emesis induced by doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide.