Efficacy Of Botulinum Toxin Type A Research Articles

Toxin for Treating Raynaud Conditions in Hands (The TORCH Study): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Raynaud disease of the hands is a complex disorder resulting in inappropriate constriction and/or insufficient dilation in microcirculation. There is an emerging role for botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the treatment armamentarium for refractory Raynaud disease. The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the management of primary and secondary Raynaud disease treated with BTX-A intervention. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review of clinical studies assessing treatment of primary or secondary Raynaud disease with BTX-A by searching Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases from inception to first August 2023. The review protocol was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022312253). Our search strategy identified 288 research articles, of which 18 studies [four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two non-RCTs, five case series, and seven retrospective cohort studies] were eligible for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the probability of pain visual analog scale score improvement with BTX-A intervention was 81.95% [95% confidence interval (74.12-87.81) P = 0.19, heterogeneity I 2 = 26%] and probability of digital ulcer healing was 79.37% [95% confidence interval (62.45-89.9) P = 0.02, heterogeneity I 2 = 56%]. Delivery of BTX-A to digital vessels in the hand may be an effective management strategy for primary and secondary Raynaud disease. A definitive, appropriately-powered RCT with objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures is required to accurately assess and quantify the efficacy of BTX-A in Raynaud disease of the hands.

The Effect of Botulinum Toxin A on the NADPH Oxidase System and Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Despite the increasing popularity of various materials for ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury mitigation, research on botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) remains limited. This study assesses BoNTA's efficacy in protecting flaps from I/R injury by inhibiting the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase system and reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Seventy-six Sprague-Dawley rats were studied. We examined the effects of BoNTA on superoxide production in four rats using a lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence assay (LECL). Another group of 60 rats had their superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps treated with either BoNTA or saline and clamped for 0, 1, and 4 hours before reperfusion. Flap survival and histological outcomes were assessed five days post-operation. ROS production in SIEA flaps and femoral vessels was analyzed in 12 additional rats, post-I/R injury. The LECL results showed that the BoNTA group had significantly lower superoxide production compared to controls, with notable reductions at 4 hours. While no significant differences were noted at the 0 and 1-hour marks, the 4-hour mark showed significant protective effects in BoNTA-treated groups. The survival rate was 90% for BoNTA-treated rats versus 60% for controls ( P = 0.028). Significant reductions in ROS were also observed in the 4-hour I/R group. BoNTA effectively protects against I/R injury by inhibiting the NADPH oxidase system and reducing ROS levels. These results support further investigation into the specific mechanisms of NADPH oxidase inhibition by BoNTA and its potential clinical applications, given its safety profile. The findings from the present study are expected to provide a basis for clinical studies regarding this use of BoNTA.

Clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of fasciitis pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) in reducing pain associated with fasciitis. By synthesizing the findings from multiple studies, we aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence regarding the efficacy of BoNT-A in the treatment of fasciitis pain. To identify studies for our report, we conducted electronic database searches of Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to November 20, 2022. We included only randomized controlled trials that examined the therapeutic effects of BoNT-A on fasciitis pain, with the primary outcome measure being the visual analog scale. We conducted statistical analyses using RevMan 5.4 software. Our final meta-analysis comprised 14 randomized controlled trials involving 537 participants, with 271 patients in the BoNT-A group and 266 patients in the control group. The overall effectiveness of BoNT-A in reducing fasciitis pain was significant, with a mean difference (MD) in visual analog scale score of -2.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.36, -1.82); P < .00001; I2 = 88%. Subgroup analysis revealed that BoNT-A was particularly effective in treating plantar fasciitis (MD = -3.34 [95% CI, -4.08, -2.78]; P < .00001; I2 = 75%), lumbar back fasciitis (MD = -2.17 [95% CI, -3.82, -0.52]; P = .001; I2 = 93%), and neck and shoulder fasciitis (MD = -1.49 [95% CI, -2.76, -0.22]; P = .02; I2 = 61%). BoNT-A has a significant analgesic effect on fasciitis pain. Therefore, BoNT-A presents a promising alternative treatment option for fasciitis (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022382805).

P.021 Botulinum toxin type a for Parkinson’s Disease - related painful foot dystonia

Background: Pain is a frequent symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD), and the therapeutic alternatives are scarce. The goal of this trial was to assess the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in the treatment of foot dystonia in PD. Methods: Randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) (double-blind parallel-group study) evaluating the safety and efficacy of BTXA for PD-related painful foot dystonia using 100 units of BTXA/placebo, followed by an open-label phase. The primary outcome was a change in pain on the King’s Parkinson’s disease Pain scale and on a visual analogue scale at 6, 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of responders, clinical global impression, MDS-UPDRS, PDQ-39 scores, and adverse events. Results: 40 subjects were screened and 33 were enrolled. The RCT blind will be opened in March 2023 after the final study visit and data will be available for presentation at the June 2023 conference. The current open-label phase has revealed a preliminary that the toxin is safe and effective in reducing pain in PD-related foot dystonia with 84% of participants noticing a significant benefit. Conclusions: According to our preliminary data, targeted BTXA injections are a safe and effective treatment in patients with foot dystonia and PD.

Comparing The Effects of Botulinum toxin-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy on treatment of allergic rhinitis

ObjectiveAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a common disease with a recent increasing in prevalence. Traditional treatment strategies of AR, sometimes, show limited effectiveness and side effects. Intranasal injection of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) and multiple postganglionic parasympathectomy of pterygopalatine ganglion (PPG) are among the increasingly used alternative treatment options of AR. In this study, we compared the early efficacy of BTX-A and multiple surgical parasympathectomy (MSP) on treatment of uncontrolled AR. MethodsSixty patients who were diagnosed with uncontrolled AR, were recruited to the study. Participants randomly underwent either intranasal injection of BTX-A (45 IU in each nostril) (Group A) or bilateral MSP (Group B). All patients were evaluated in terms of nasal hypersecretions, congestion and sneezing with visual analogue scale prior to treatment and at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 6 months during the follow-up period. ResultsA significant difference in the degree of nasal hypersecretions and sneezing could be identified in both groups before and after the interventions. Although the significant efficacy on sneezing was documented in group A and B only in the first 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, such efficacy on nasal hypersecretions extended for 12 weeks in group A and throughout the follow-up period in group B. Nasal congestion did not differ significantly in both groups. ConclusionBoth BTX-A and MSP, in patients with uncontrolled AR, may be a long-lasting therapeutic option for the treatment of nasal hypersecretions, but not as effective as for sneezing and nasal congestion.

Phenol vs. botulinum toxin A injection for managing lower limb spasticity in adult patients with upper motor lesions: A randomized clinical trial

Background: Phenol and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections are two options for treating spasticity with the ability to select a specific spastic muscle and determine the dosage based on spasticity degree. This study intends to compare the efficacy of BTX-A vs. phenol blockade in treating lower limb spasticity and to evaluate the performance improvement in gross motor functional outcomes among adult patients with upper motor neuron (UMN) lesions. Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial of 28 spastic lower limb adult patients with UMN was diagnosed between March 1, 2017, to April 30, 2019. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a “BTX-A injections” or a “Phenol injections” group. The outcomes were measured through assessment spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), active range of motion (AROM) of lower limb joint by a goniometer, Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS) as a baseline and post-injection follow-up at 24 hours, 3 weeks, and 3 months. Results: All 28 randomized patients were analyzed. No significant difference between the two study arms, neither in demographic characteristics nor in MAS, AROM, VRS, VAS, and PSFS parameters prior to the procedures. AROM showed a significant decrease from baseline throughout the study in the phenol group. While in the BTX-A group, they improved significantly at 3 weeks; no more improvement was observed at 3 months, and the differences were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). The reduction in MAS, VRS, VAS, and PSFS was statistically significant in each group at 24 hours, 3 weeks, and 3 months after the injection (p &lt; 0.05). However, the differences were not significant between the phenol and BTX-A groups (p &gt; 0.05), except for PSFS at the 3 months of follow-up in the Phenol group (p = 0.01). The need for re-injection at 6 months and 9 months was that 5 patients vs. 0 patients (p = 0.01) and 8 patients vs. 3 patients (p = 0.04) in the BTX-A and phenol groups, respectively, were statistically significant. Conclusion: Phenol injection showed superior treatment effects in AROM, decreased spasm degree based on PSFS at 3 months, and less-frequent re-injection rate compared to BTX-A injections in adult patients with UMN lesions. However, both phenol and BTX-A injections effectively reduce spasticity without significant differences in efficacy and adverse effects. Future studies must be conducted with a longer duration of follow-up, and larger sample sizes better to compare both drugs’ effectiveness and side effects. Trial registration: The study protocol was registered as a clinical trial under registration IRCT20170826035914N2 at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir).

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type-A I in the Improvement of Mandibular Motion and Muscle Sensibility in Myofascial Pain TMD Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study assessed the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) in mandibular range of motion and muscle tenderness to palpation in persistent myofascial pain (MFP) patients (ReBEC RBR-2d4vvv). Eighty consecutive female subjects with persistent MFP, were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20): three BoNT-A groups with different doses and a saline solution group (placebo control group). Treatments were injected bilaterally in the masseter and anterior temporalis muscle in a single session. Clinical measurements of mandibular movements included: pain-free opening, maximum unassisted and assisted opening, and right and left lateral excursions. Palpation tests were performed bilaterally in the masseter and temporalis muscle. Follow-up occurred 28 and 180 days after treatment. For the statistical analysis the Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction was used for groups comparisons. Regardless of dose, all parameters of mandibular range of motion significantly improved after 180 days in all BoNT-A groups, compared with the control group. Palpation pain over the masseter and temporalis muscles were significantly reduced in all BoNT-A groups regardless of dose, compared with the control group, after 28 and 180 days of treatment. Independent of doses, BoNT-A improved mandibular range of motion and muscle tenderness to palpation in persistent MFP patients.

Botulinum toxin A in dentistry and orofacial surgery: an evidence-based review - part 1: therapeutic applications.

Objective An evidence-based review on the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA) in orofacial conditions, focusing on the therapeutic applications and role of BoNTA as an adjuvant treatment.Data source and selection Data was collected using PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials electronic databases. Having satisfied the search parameters, 32 studies for therapeutic applications and 26 for BoNTA as an adjunctive treatment were included. The quality of relevant studies was assessed using the Best Evidence Topics (BETs) Critical Appraisal Tool.Data extraction The highest level of evidence (LOE) behind BoNTA safety and efficacy was for wound healing and scar management in the orofacial surgery context, where BoNTA was presented as an adjunctive modality. Level-I evidence was controversial for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism. However, it showed promising results for painful temporomandibular disorders of myogenic origin refractory to conservative therapies, and to decrease muscle contraction intensity in sleeping bruxism. There was only one level-II study for persistent recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Data showed limited level-III evidence for orofacial pain conditions (temporomandibular joint recurrent dislocation and pain, burning mouth syndrome or atypical odontalgia), oral cancer complications, or as an adjuvant to maxillofacial and orthognathic surgeries. Benefits of BoNTA in prosthodontics had weak level-IV evidence. No evidence was found among the periodontology field.Conclusion There is growing evidence to support the safety and efficacy of BoNTA in the investigated orofacial pathological conditions, with high levels of satisfaction from the patient and clinician perspective. However, there are some inconsistencies and limited high-quality evidence available. Well-designed controlled clinical trials are necessary to evaluate long-term safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness before BoNTA is widely adopted with irrefutable evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin in masseter muscle hypertrophy for lower face contouring.

Masseter muscle hypertrophy (MMH) usually presents with cosmetic concerns as it may lead to widening of the lower face. Apart from the traditional surgical approaches, botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injection is a non-invasive treatment option available. There are no standard guidelines for this procedure. To study the efficacy of botulinumtoxin A in MMH for lower face contouring. The Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, Google-scholar, Science-Direct database, and ResearchGate from inception until September 2021 were searched using the keywords "botulinumtoxin type A," "masseter muscle hypertrophy," "lower face contouring," and "masseter botox." All available retrospective and prospective studies, case-series, case-reports, and expert reviews were included with an emphasis on efficacy of BTA in MMH and units injected into the muscle, points of placement, adverse events, and the duration of its effect. Reference lists of the resultant articles, as well as relevant reviews, were also searched. 40 articles were shortlisted for the review, of which 14studies with sample-size ≥10 in accordance with the study requirements were summarized in a tabular form for analysis and easy comparison and reference. BTA injection is a non-invasive, safe, and effective treatment for MMH. The optimum number of BTA units could not be ascertained due to wide variability in the studies as well as ethnicity of patients and extent or some measurement of MMH. The points of placement of injection should be well within the boundaries of the masseter muscle. The maximum effect of BTA after a single injection session is usually seen in ~3months, and the duration may last for 6-12months. Multiple injection sessions may be required to maintain a long-term effect. Injection technique and total number of injection units of neuromodulator must be individualized for each patient.

Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin injection in reducing deltoid muscle hypertrophy.

With the increasing demand for body contouring, botulinum toxin (BTX) injection is being widely used off-label for muscular hypertrophy. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated the clinical efficacy of BTX type A (BTX-A) in deltoid muscle hypertrophy. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular injection of BTX in reducing deltoid muscle hypertrophy. Overall, 10 patients with bilateral deltoid muscle hypertrophy were treated with an intramuscular injection of prabotulinum toxin A, with a total of 50 units [U] administered per patient. As measured by ultrasonography, the thickness of the deltoid muscles was significantly decreased at weeks 2 and 12. In addition, the clinical assessment score by blinded investigators was improved after the treatment; however, patients' satisfaction scores were relatively low. No major complications were reported. Therefore, intramuscular injection of BTX-A seems to be a candidate for novel treatment option for deltoid muscle hypertrophy. Further larger clinical studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy of BTX-A.

Botulinum toxin for chronic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is a potential treatment for chronic rhinitis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of BTX-A in treating patients with chronic rhinitis. Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of BTX-A in allergic rhinitis and/or nonallergic rhinitis patients, compared with either placebo or active treatment, were included. The outcomes were total nasal symptom (TNSS), disease-specific quality of life (QOL), and adverse events. Nine RCTs (340 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Compared with placebo, the ≤ 12-week effects favored BTX-A injection on TNSS (standardized mean difference [SMD] -2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.27 to -1.17, p<0.01, four RCTs). Beneficial effects>12 weeks over placebo (MD -9.69, 95% CI -11.29 to -8.09, p<0.01, one RCT) were demonstrated up to 24weeks. However, the benefits were not shown on nasal congestion and individual nasal symptoms. Compared with active comparators (triamcinolone injection, ipratropium bromide, and cetirizine), there was no difference in the<12-week effect between groups on TNSS. There was no difference between BTX-A and cetirizine on QOL (one RCT). The>12-week effects on TNSS and individual nasal symptoms favored BTX-A over triamcinolone injection (one RCT). The risk ratio of adverse events favored BTX-A over cetirizine (one RCT). BTX-A improved TNSS and QOL in patients with chronic rhinitis. These effects were demonstrated up to 24weeks post treatment. BTX-A was safe, well tolerated, and may be considered in patients who are refractory to current standard-of-care therapies.

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Preventing Postoperative Scars and Improving the Cosmetic Appearance of Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Scars with poor cosmesis that develop after wound healing may affect normal life. To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) in preventing postoperative hypertrophic scars or keloids. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from their inception date up to February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of BTXA in preventing hypertrophic scars or keloids. The primary outcome measures included the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, scar width, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Twelve RCTs involving 497 cases (372 patients) were included. The meta-analysis showed significant differences in the VAS score (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.55, P < .00001), VSS score (WMD = -1.02, 95% CI = -1.72 to -0.32, P = .004), scar width (WMD = -0.18, 95% CI = -0.29 to -0.08, P = .0008), and patient satisfaction (relative risk = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P = .01). Four studies reported trivial adverse events. This meta-analysis showed that BTXA was more effective than the control treatment in preventing postoperative scars and improving the cosmetic appearance of facial scars for East Asians, and no serious adverse events were found during the follow-up period. However, there was insufficient evidence to support the use of BTXA for the prevention of scars in patients from other ethnic groups and regions or scars in non-facial areas.

Botulinum Toxin A and physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis spasticity: Patient-tailored goal setting and the measurement of its achievement

Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) is known to be effective in improving focal spasticity; a few data are available on BT-A efficacy in improving function and quality of life in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). To evaluate in MS patients presenting with focal spasticity the grade of achievement of the predefined goals through the treatment with BT-A and physiotherapy a longitudinal prospective study was drawn in 11 patients; for each patient it was fixed an individualized rehabilitative program and BT-A was administered depending on spasticity pattern. The evaluation of the adequate achievement of the target was done at week 4 using the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). Specific scales were applied depending on the function or disability domain involved. All of them had a progressive form of MS; EDSS was 6.5 mean (4–8). 8 patients had as target gait improvement, 2 postural changes and 1 posture improving. 9 out of 11 reached the fixed target, 6 of them with gait improvement as target. Our data suggest that an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in treating focal spasticity is effective for reaching the individualized objective targeted on actual needs of single patient. This is the first step for a subsequent evaluation of a real impact of our intervention in reducing global disability of MS patients.

Botulinum toxin for facial neuralgia.

Data sourcesMedline via PubMed, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched until April 2014.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BoTN-A) with placebo in patients with painful trigeminal (TN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) reporting changes in pain intensity in patients aged 19 years and older available in English were included.Data extraction and synthesisThree authors independently assessed for inclusion, extracted standard data and assessed for risk of bias. The primary outcomes were baseline and post treatment intensity of pain and patients reporting pain relief of 50% or greater.For continuous outcomes the treatment effect was measured as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For dichotomous outcome of reduction of pain of 50% or more, relative risk (risk ratio) with 95% CIs was reported. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with Cochran's test for heterogeneity and quantified by the I2 statistic. Results were combined using random-effects model in the presence of statistical heterogeneity otherwise fixed effect model was used.ResultsSix studies were included. The effects of the interventions were presented in three meta-analyses. Mean difference in post treatment pain (six studies) pooled results showed a reduction of -3.009 in the VAS (95% CI -4.566 to -1.453 p<0.001) with the use of BoTN-A. Standardised difference in mean post treatment pain (six studies) was -0.918 (95% CI -1.197 to -0.639 p<0.001) in favor of BoTN-A. For the percentage of patients experiencing 50% pain reduction (three studies) absolute risk difference and relative risk were calculated (RR 2.892, 95% CI 1.726 to 4.848 p<0.001) in favour of the use of BoTN-A.ConclusionsThe authors concluded that there is moderate evidence regarding the efficacy of BoTN-A in treating patients with trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin in treating myofascial pain and occlusal force characteristics of masticatory muscles in bruxism.

The present study was conducted in patients with bruxism to evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) (Botox, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) in the treatment of myofascial pain and the occlusal force characteristics of masticatory muscles. Twenty-four diagnosed with bruxism were randomly divided into three groups (n = 8) and treated by bilateral intramuscular injection of BTX-A and placebo-treated with saline placebo injections and control group where no injections were given. The clinical parameters such as pain at rest and during chewing were assessed and occlusal force analysis system to measure the distribution of occlusal force in bruxism patients. All the three groups were assessed at baseline time and at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up appointments. Descriptive analysis showed that improvements in parameters such as pain at rest; pain during chewing clinical outcome variables were higher in the botox treated group than in the placebo-treated subjects. The pain at rest and at chewing decreased in the BTX-A group while remaining constant in the placebo group and control group. There was a significant change in maximum occlusal force in the BTX-A group compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05, post hoc Bonferroni test, no exact P value), and there was no significant difference between the placebo and control groups (post hoc Bonferroni test, no exact P value). Results from the present study supported the efficacy of BTX-A to reduce myofascial pain symptoms in bruxers, and effective in reducing the occlusal force.

Investigating the Efficacy of Vibration Anesthesia to Reduce Pain From Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin Injections

Many analgesic modalities have been employed with limited success to alleviate the pain associated with botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections. Vibration is an effective method of reducing pain during facial cosmetic injections, but it has not been previously studied in the context of clinical cosmetic procedures. The authors evaluate the safety and efficacy of vibration-assisted anesthesia for reducing pain associated with BTX-A injections. In this prospective study, 50 patients received BTX-A injections for cosmetic rhytid reduction. Injections were given in a split-face design that was randomly assigned. A vibration stimulus was coadministered with BTX-A injections on one side, while the other side of each patient's face received BTX-A injections alone. Patients completed a questionnaire immediately posttreatment and were contacted for follow-up three to four weeks later. Patients reported less injection pain on the vibration-treated half of the face as compared to the control side (an average of 1.3 vs 2.4 on a five-point scale; P = .000). Overall, 86% of patients preferred to receive vibration with their next BTX-A treatment. There was no significant difference between first-time and repeat BTX-A patients in terms of preference for vibration. Five of 50 patients experienced transient side effects perceived to be associated with vibration, including tingling teeth, increased bruising, and headaches. Of the patients who did not request vibration with subsequent BTX-A injections, none cited decreased BTX-A efficacy as the reason for their preference. Vibration is a safe and effective means of reducing patient discomfort during BTX-A injections for cosmetic rhytid reduction and may have applications in other cosmetic procedures.

Therapeutic effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A based on severity of palmar hyperhidrosis

A dose of 60 units (U) of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) has been confirmed to have efficacy for patients with palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. However, the effectiveness of this dose is limited in severe cases defined as sweat production of 2 mg/cm(2) per min or more (measured by the ventilated capsule method) and a Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) grade of 3 or 4. An increased dose of 90 U of BT-A was found to reduce sweating for approximately 7 months. In a comparison of patients with sweat production of more than 2.5 mg/cm(2) per min and an HDSS grade of 4 and patients with sweat production of 2.5 mg/cm(2) per min or less and an HDSS grade of 3, there was no difference in the reduction of sweat production at 5 months, but the duration of the reduced sweating was shorter for the former group. This suggests that there are limits to the efficacy of BT-A for severe forms of the disease with sweat production of more than 2.5 mg/cm(2) per mL.

Toxine botulique et douleur des neuropathies périphériques : que peut-on en attendre ?

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is a potent neurotoxin that blocks acetylcholine release from presynaptic nerve terminals by cleaving the SNARE complex. BTX-A has been reported to have analgesic effects independent of its action on muscle tone. The most robust results have been observed in patients with neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain due to peripheral lesions has been the most widely studied. BTX-A has shown its efficacy on pain and allodynia in various animal models of inflammatory neuropathic pain. The only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with focal painful neuropathies due to nerve trauma or postherpetic neuralgia demonstrated significant effects on average pain intensity from 2 weeks after the injections to 14 weeks. Most patients reported pain during the injections, but there were no further local or systemic side effects. The efficacy of BTX-A in painful peripheral neuropathies has been more recently studied. Results were positive in the only study in an animal model of peripheral neuropathy. One study in patients with diabetic painful peripheral neuropathy demonstrated a significant decrease in Visual Analog Scale. In conclusion, one session of multiple intradermal injection of BTX-A produces long-lasting analgesic effects in patients with focal painful neuropathies and diabetic neuropathic pain, and is particularly well tolerated. The findings are consistent with a reduction of peripheral sensitisation, the place of a possible central effect remaining to define. Further studies are needed to assess some important issues, i.e. BTX-A efficacy in patients with small fiber neuropathies and the relevance of early and repeated injections. Future studies could also provide valuable insights into pathophysiology of neuropathic pain.

Treatment Effects of Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection on Alopecia Areata

There are several different treatment options for alopecia areata (AA); Botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) can induce changes in neurotransmitter levels, directly or via neuroimmunologic mechanisms. Therefore it is thought that BTXA may influence cytokines that are responsible for hair growth arrest that characterizes AA. To prospectively examine the safety and efficacy of BTXA injections for the treatment of patients with AA of the scalp. Seven patients with AA received 10 U of BTXA intradermal injections on each site three times. Subjects were classified according to the extent of scalp hair loss into Severity of Alopecia Tool subclasses. Two patients had one patch of AA; the remaining patients had total or universal type AA. One patient dropped out of the study after experiencing spontaneous recovery from her AA. One patient reported aggravation of her AA after BTXA injections. The remaining patients' AA did not change after BTXA injections. Our results suggest that BTXA injection cannot be used as an alternative treatment for recalcitrant AA. Nevertheless, future studies concerning the treatment efficacy of BTXA for mild to moderate AA are warranted.

Use of botulinum toxin A for drug-refractory trigeminal neuralgia: preliminary report

Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been used to treat migraine and occipital neuralgia. We report preliminary results of an ongoing study that assesses the efficacy of BTX-A on trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients refractory to medical treatment. We treated 15 patients (8 men and 7 women) between 28 and 67 years of age who were suffering from drug-refractory TN from February 2008 to January 2010. Symptoms, including pain duration, provoking factors, affected nerve branch, frequency of TN attacks, and severity of pain just before injections, were evaluated 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after injection. We injected 50 U reconstituted BTX-A solution at the trigger zones. The overall response to treatment was assessed via a 9-point patient global assessment scale and compared with values at baseline. Statistical analysis was performed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for frequency of TN attacks, the Friedman test for severity of pain, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for PGA, and all with the use of SPSS software. Eight men and 7 women aged 28-67 years (mean 48.9 y) suffering from TN from 6 months to 24 years all improved regarding frequency and severity of pain attacks; in 7 patients, pain was completely eradicated and there was no need for further medication. In 5 patients, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were enough to alleviate pain attacks, and 3 patients again responded to anticonvulsive drugs after injection. All patients developed higher pain thresholds after injections. The ANOVA test showed a significant difference in frequency of attacks before injection and at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after injection (P < .001). Friedman test and pair comparison of pain severity scores with Bonferroni correction adjustment showed a significant difference (P < .001) between severity of pain before and after injection. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant improvement in all patients up to 6 months after injection (P < .001). Complications included transient paresis of the buccal branch of the facial nerve in 3 patients. This study supports other similar studies and shows that BTX-A is a minimally invasive method that can play a role in treating TN before other more invasive therapies, i.e., radiofrequency and surgery.