Efficacy Of Atorvastatin In Patients Research Articles

Current and Future Treatment Options for Cerebral Cavernous Malformations

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are vascular lesions associated with seizures, hemorrhage, and neurologic deficits. The familial form of CCM constitutes ≈20% of cases and presents with multifocal lesions in the brain and spinal cord, whereas the more common sporadic form typically involves a single lesion. Treatments of CCM include surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery, as well as management of symptoms (eg, seizures). Surgical resection or irradiation of lesions in eloquent areas requires careful consideration because of the potential for morbidity and mortality, and these treatments are not advised for asymptomatic lesions. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe the current state of treatments for CCM, with an emphasis on potential clinically relevant pharmacologic treatments aimed at targeting aberrant molecular signaling associated with CCM. Literature was identified through PubMed using search terms related to treatments of CCMs. In endothelial cells, overactivation of RhoA/Rho‐associated kinase contributes to disruption of cell‐cell junctions and a shift to a senescence‐associated secretory phenotype, which leads to inflammation, migration, and invasiveness of mutant endothelial cells. Specific (NRL‐1049) and nonspecific (fasudil, statins) inhibition of Rho‐associated kinase has shown effectiveness to reduce lesion burden in mouse models of CCM. A phase 1/2 clinical trial is currently underway to investigate the efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with CCM, and a first‐in‐human clinical trial to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of NRL‐1049 began in 2023. The β‐blocker propranolol and the superoxide dismutase mimetic REC‐994 have also shown effectiveness in attenuating lesion burden in preclinical studies. Results from a pilot phase 2 clinical trial of propranolol support further investigation in an adequately powered trial, and the safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential efficacy of REC‐994 are currently being evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial. Additional agents have been used solely in preclinical models and require clinical evaluation.

Genderspecific features of antioxidant protection and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with stable forms of coronary heart disease

The gender-specific features of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are actively being discussed which puts on the agenda the development of a differentiated approach to the treatment of cardiac diseases in men and women. Аim. To assess the gender-specific features of the antioxidant status and antioxidative activity of atorvastatin in patients with stable forms of coronary heart disease (CHD) and dyslipidemia (DLP). Material and methods. The study included 102 patients with stable forms of CHD divided into 2 groups according to sex and 40 healthy individuals. The generally accepted methods were used to determine plasma lipids, products of their peroxidation (diene conjugates, DC) and the products reacting with 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA-RP), the antioxidant enzymes glutathione peroxidase (GP) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in erythrocytes; the activity of the ceruloplasmin/transferrin antioxidant system (AOA AOS CP/TF) in blood plasma was measured by electron paramagnetic resonance and the final metabolites of nitric oxide with the use of the Griss reagent. The endothelial function was studied by ultrasound with the assessment of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation as described by D. Celermajer et al. (1992). All parameters were evaluated before and 6 months after the onset of the treatment. Results. The men with CHD, unlike women, underwent a reduction of AOA AOS CP/TF by 10%, SOD by 12% and GP by 19% (p<0.05) as well as excessive accumulation of DC up to 9% and TBA-RP to 11% (p<0.05). The homocysteine level in men, was 1.5 times higher (p=0.01), and that of final nitric oxide metabolites 12% lower (p=0.03) than in women. Atorvastatin administered for 6 months as a component of combined cardiac therapy more significantly increased the activity of AOS CP/TF and endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in men than in women. Conclusion. CHD is associated with significant sex differences in processes of lipid peroxidation - antioxidant protection, metabolism of nitric oxide, found, dilatation and anti-oxidation effect of atorvastatin.

Atorvastatin Efficacy in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events

Atorvastatin has been extensively studied in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, and may have some clinical advantages over various other statins in these respects. The principal primary prevention study of atorvastatin, ASCOT-LLA (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm), revealed that atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of primary coronary heart disease (CHD) events by 36% (p = 0.0005) compared with placebo in patients with hypertension. Much published data confirm the secondary preventive benefits of atorvastatin in various clinical settings. The IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) and TNT (Treating to New Targets) trials demonstrate the preventive efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with stable CHD. Relative to simvastatin (in the IDEAL trial) and low-dosage atorvastatin (in the TNT trial), intensive atorvastatin therapy (80 mg/day) reduced the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) by 17-22% (p < or = 0.02). Furthermore, the ALLIANCE (Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events) and GREACE (GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation) trials highlight the benefits of atorvastatin in the 'real world' setting in patients with stable CHD. Compared with 'usual' care, atorvastatin reduced the risk of nonfatal MI by 47-59% (p < or = 0.0002).Moreover, the MIRACL (Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering), PROVE-IT (PRavastatin Or atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy) and IDEAL-ACS (Acute Coronary Syndromes) studies outline the benefits of high-dosage atorvastatin therapy started within 24-96 hours, 10 days or 2 months, respectively, of an acute coronary syndrome. Relative to placebo, pravastatin and simvastatin, atorvastatin reduced the risk of death or major cardiovascular events by 16-18% (p < or = 0.048). In patients undergoing revascularisation procedures, the AVERT (Atorvastatin VErsus Revascularisation Treatment) study revealed that 18 months' administration of atorvastatin 80 mg/day was at least as effective as angioplasty plus usual care in reducing the risk of ischaemic events in low-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease. Furthermore, the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction in MYocardial DAmage during angioplasty) and ARMYDA-3 trials showed that 7 days' administration of atorvastatin 40 mg/day before coronary intervention significantly reduced the risks of periprocedural myocardial damage (ARMYDA), postprocedural MI (p = 0.025; ARMYDA) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.003; ARMYDA-3) versus placebo. In addition, it has been reported that C-reactive protein levels and the combined incidence of cardiovascular events (death, MI and target segment revascularisation during the 6-month follow-up) were significantly higher in coronaropathic patients undergoing non-surgical revascularisation procedures (stent implantation) not receiving statin therapy compared with those treated with atorvastatin (80mg). Overall, therefore, the marked efficacy of atorvastatin in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events underscores the pivotal place that this statin has in general cardiovascular disease management, and suggests even greater potential clinical utility for the drug in some clinical settings.

Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe renal dysfunction

To investigate the efficacy and safety of a daily dose of 10 mg of atorvastatin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 and a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min. This was an open, prospective, randomized study. A total of 143 patients were included: 73 were controls and 70 were prescribed 10 mg/day of atorvastatin. As efficacy variables, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined at the start of the study and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months. The follow-up period was a mean of 20+/-14.4 months (range 1-36 months) for those on atorvastatin versus 22+/-12.7 months (range 0.5-36 months) for the controls. Compared with baseline values, patients treated with atorvastatin had significantly lower concentrations of total cholesterol at Month 36 (5.8 vs 4.4 mmol/l; -23%; p<0.001), of LDL cholesterol at Month 36 (3.6 vs 2.2 mmol/l; -35%; p<0.001) and of triglycerides at Months 24 (2.5 vs 1.9 mmol/l) and 36 (2.5 vs 1.8 mmol/l). The controls had significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol at Month 36 (p<0.21) and of LDL cholesterol at Months 30 and 36. Compared with the controls, the atorvastatin group had lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at Months 1-30. Fifteen patients (21%) stopped taking their medication as they could not tolerate the side-effects, the most frequent complaints being gastrointestinal discomfort and headache. Although the medication caused no severe adverse events, we recommend caution when using atorvastatin for severe CKD patients until further evidence of its safety and efficacy is verified.

Effects of atorvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein subclass, and C-reactive protein in hemodialysis patients

Dyslipidemia is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with dyslipidemia associated with CRF who were undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Thirty-five patients who were receiving HD were given atorvastatin (10 mg/d) for 3 months. Chylomicron (CM), light and dense very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and light and dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were separated by ultracentrifugation. Apolipoprotein (apo) B was measured by electroimmunoassay. Mean LDL particle diameter was measured by gradient gel electrophoresis. Atorvastatin therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol (C) by 36% and remnant-like particle (RLP)-C by 58%. Atorvastatin significantly reduced apo B, apo CIII, and apo E in VLDL by 40% to 46% and IDL-apo B by 66%. Atorvastatin also significantly reduced cholesterol in CM, light VLDL, and dense VLDL without consistently affecting triglyceride (TG) in these lipoproteins. Atorvastatin similarly reduced both light and dense LDL-apo B by 38%. LDL particle size in the HD patients significantly increased during atorvastatin treatment from 25.7 ± 0.4 to 26.2 ± 0.6 nm. High sensitive C-reactive protein (HS-CRP) was halved by atorvastatin decreasing from 0.08 ± 0.05 to 0.04 ± 0.03 mg/dL. Atorvastatin treatment did not affect the creatinine kinase level, and no classical adverse effects were observed during the study. These results suggest that atorvastatin is safe and effective for the management of dyslipidemia in patients with CFR who are receiving HD, which may help to suppress the development of atherosclerosis.

Efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe familiar hypercholesterolemia treated with pravastatin, fluvastatin and simvastatin

Efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe familiar hypercholesterolemia treated with pravastatin, fluvastatin and simvastatin