Efficacy Of Glycemic Control Research Articles

Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide versus semaglutide: a multi-institutional analysis

Abstract Introduction Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been demonstrated to have cardiovascular benefits in patients with diabetes. Two of the most prescribed medications in this class are tirzepatide and semaglutide. Tirzepatide is a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist, while semaglutide is a selective GLP-1 receptor agonist. Tirzepatide and semaglutide have previously been directly compared to assess efficacy in glycemic control as the primary endpoint. However, there is limited data directly comparing cardiovascular outcomes between the two medications in patients with diabetes. This retrospective cohort study compares the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide or semaglutide. Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify differences in cardiovascular outcomes between patients with diabetes treated with tirzepatide as compared to semaglutide. Materials and Methods The TriNetX research network was used for this study. Two patient cohorts were generated using International Classification of Disease 10 (ICD-10) codes and medication codes in the TriNetX system. Both cohorts of patients had a history of diabetes (E08-E13) and no prior history of cerebral vascular accident (I63) or myocardial infarction (I21). One cohort received semaglutide and the other tirzepatide. Each cohort was prohibited from receiving the other agent. The cohorts were balanced for age, race, gender, and ethnicity by propensity score matching and the greedy nearest neighbor algorithm resulting in 36,212 patients in each arm. They were then evaluated for the 3-year outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident, and death). Results Tirzepatide was associated with statistically significantly fewer MACE outcomes compared to semaglutide for each of the individual endpoints as well as the overall composite endpoint over the 3 year follow up period. Table 1. MACE events for semaglutide and tirzepatide. Table 2. Relative risks for semaglutide MACE endpoints compared to tirzepatide. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, tirzepatide was associated with a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to semaglutide in patients with diabetes. These findings suggest that tirzepatide offers superior cardiovascular protection for primary prevention compared to semaglutide and warrant further investigation in future studies and clinical trials.Table 1Table 2

Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Add-on in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled with Metformin and Dapagliflozin: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, and Placebo-controlled Study

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of pioglitazone compared with placebo (PBO) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin. MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial, 366 patients with T2D who did not meet glycemic targets (7.0% ≤ glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≤ 10.5%), despite treatment with metformin ≥1000 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg, received either a PBO, 15 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO15), or 30 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO30). The primary end point was the mean change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks across the groups. FindingsFor the 366 participants (PBO, n = 124; PIO15, n = 118; PIO30, n = 124), the mean age was 55.6 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.7 years, with a baseline HbA1c of 7.9%. After 24 weeks, HbA1c reduced significantly in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups from baseline, with intergroup differences of −0.38% and −0.83%, respectively, compared with the PBO group. The proportion of patients with HbA1c levels <7% was significantly higher in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups than in the PBO group. The adverse event rates did not significantly differ across the groups, indicating favorable safety profiles for triple combination therapy using metformin, dapagliflozin, and pioglitazone. ImplicationsThe addition of pioglitazone as a third oral antidiabetic medication is an appropriate option for patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin based on the resulting significant efficacy in glycemic control and favorable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04885712.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors: Focus on Dapagliflozin.

Dapagliflozin (trade name FARXIGA) is a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor that has transcended its initial antidiabetic application to demonstrate benefits in cardiac and renal diseases. It was first approved by the food and department administration for type 2 diabetes in 2014. Since then, it has gained food and department administration approval for chronic kidney disease in 2021, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in 2020, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in 2023. Thus, dapagliflozin plays a pivotal role in improving patient outcomes. By competitive binding to renal SGLT-2 cotransporters, dapagliflozin effectively prevents glucose and sodium reabsorption, leading to glucosuria. Its pharmacokinetic profile involves minimal cytochrome P450-induced metabolism, rapid absorption with an 18-hour duration of action, and stable effects. Clinical trials have revealed dapagliflozin's efficacy in glycemic control without the risk of hypoglycemia, making it an advantageous choice for patients insufficiently managed on other antidiabetic drugs. Comparative analysis with other SGLT-2 inhibitors suggests dapagliflozin's potential superiority in preventing heart failure. Compared to empagliflozin, it has more extended effects, contributing to stable sodium diuresis, reduced blood pressure fluctuations, and potentially lower cardiovascular disease risks. However, it leads to less urinary glucose excretion compared with canagliflozin. Dapagliflozin has specific contraindications, such as type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic kidney disease. Adverse effects include an increased risk of genital infections, urinary tract infections, and Fournier's gangrene. A nuanced understanding of dapagliflozin's benefits and limitations is imperative for informed clinical decision-making in the management of diabetes and its complications.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors and Their Correlation With Kidney Stones. A Systematic Review

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have emerged as a valuable class of medications for managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) due to their efficacy in glycemic control and cardiovascular and renal benefits. However, concerns have been raised regarding their potential association with an increased risk of kidney stone formation. Objective: This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the existing literature to determine the association between SGLT-2 inhibitors and kidney stone formation, elucidate potential underlying mechanisms, and discuss implications for clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Sciences, Medline, and Scopus was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant research articles investigating the utilization of SGLT-2 inhibitors in humans and their potential correlation with kidney stones were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and a mixed-methods synthesis approach was used for data analysis. Results: The systematic review identified several studies examining the association between SGLT-2 inhibitors and kidney stones. Overall, SGLT-2 inhibitors were found to be associated with a potential protective effect against kidney stone formation. Mechanistically, SGLT-2 inhibitors promote glycosuria and natriuresis, leading to increased urine flow rate and enhanced urinary volume, which may help dilute and flush out stone-forming substances. However, certain limitations and considerations, including potential adverse events and variations in study designs, were also highlighted. Conclusion: This systematic review provides valuable insights into the potential correlation between SGLT-2 inhibitors and kidney stones. While the observed protective effect against kidney stone formation is promising, further research with longer follow-up durations and larger sample sizes is warranted to establish a more conclusive understanding of this relationship. Nonetheless, clinicians should remain vigilant in monitoring patients using SGLT-2 inhibitors and carefully assess individual risk factors when prescribing these medications.

A two-step method preparation of semaglutide through solid-phase synthesis and inclusion body expression

Semaglutide is currently the most promising antidiabetic drug, especially for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, due to its excellent efficacy in glycemic control and weight loss. However, the production of semaglutide remains high cost, and high yield, low cost, and high purity still remains a challenge. Herein, we reported a convenient and high-yield strategy for the preparation of semaglutide through fragmented condensation coupling, involving solid-phase peptide synthesis of tetrapeptide and on-column refolding and on-column enzyme cleavage based inclusion body expression of Lys26Arg34GLP-1 (11–37) with fused protein tags in an X-Y-D4K-G pattern. The optimized N-terminal protein tag significantly boosts inclusion body expression level, while on-column refolding and on-column enzyme cleavage avoid precipitation, enhancing efficiency and yield together with one-step purification. The successful preparation of semaglutide is expected to achieve large-scale industrial production with low cost, high yield and high purity.

Plant-Based Diet and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence from a Thai Health-Promoting Hospital.

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is associated with diet. While consumption of plant-based foods may reduce blood sugar levels, the impact of consuming plant-based foods on fasting blood sugar levels has not been well defined. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Health-Promoting Hospital in Pak Phun Municipality, Thailand. It included 61 patients with T2DM and 74 controls matched for age and gender. Dietary intake levels among T2DM and controls were assessed by a validated food-frequency questionnaire from which plant-based-food scores were calculated. This study found significant differences between specific plant foods and fasting blood sugar levels in patients with T2DM. Adherence to a plant-based diet appeared to influence fasting blood sugar levels. Patients who consumed higher amounts of certain vegetables and fruits showed lower fasting blood sugar levels. Diabetic patients consumed more legumes than controls, but the consumption of cereals and nuts/seeds in the two groups were similar. Consumption of nuts and seeds was also associated with a 76.3% reduction in the risk of a T2DM diagnosis. These findings suggest the potential efficacy of glycemic control in T2DM patients. More work is required to explore strategies for preventing and treating metabolic disorders through dietary modification.

Psychiatric adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used due to their profound efficacy in glycemic control and weight management. Within real-world contexts, the manifestation of certain psychiatric adverse events (AEs) has been observed, which is potentially linked to the administration of GLP-1 RAs. The objective of this study was to undertake a comprehensive investigation and characterization of the psychiatric AEs associated with GLP-1 RAs. We retrieved reports of AEs associated with treatment with GLP-1 RAs during the period from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to Q1 2023 from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Descriptive analysis was performed to examine the clinical characteristics and time to onset of the psychiatric AEs caused by GLP-1 RAs. Moreover, disproportionality analyses were performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) to identify GLP-1 RA-related psychiatric AEs. A total of 8,240 reports of psychiatric AEs were analyzed out of 181,238 AE reports with treatment with GLP-1 RAs. Among these cases, a higher percentage was represented by women compared to men (65.89% vs. 30.96%). The median age of these patients was 56 years, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 48-67 years, based on data available in 286 case reports. This study showed that the median time to onset of the overall GLP-1 RA-related AEs was 31 days (IQR = 7-145.4 days), which varied among GLP-1 RA regimens. Specifically, exenatide had a significantly longer onset time at 45 days (IQR = 11-213 days), with statistically significant differences from the onset times of the other five GLP-1 RAs (p< 0.0001). Moreover, eight categories of psychiatric AEs, namely, nervousness (ROR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.85-2.11), stress (ROR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.19-1.38), eating disorder (ROR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.40-1.77), fear of injection (ROR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.60-2.40), sleep disorder due to general medical condition-insomnia type (ROR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.60-2.52), binge eating (ROR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.75-4.16), fear of eating (ROR 3.35, 95% CI = 1.65-6.78), and self-induced vomiting (ROR = 3.77, 95% CI = 1.77-8.03), were defined as GLP-1 RA-related psychiatric AEs through disproportionality analysis. Our findings demonstrate a significant association between GLP-1 RAs and the development of specific psychiatric AEs. Despite the observational nature of this pharmacovigilance study and the inherent limitations of the FAERS database, our preliminary findings in this work could provide a better basis for understanding the potential psychiatric AEs that may occur with GLP-1 RA treatment, assisting clinicians to focus on these AEs and provide early intervention for optimal risk management.

Non-Insulin Antidiabetic Agents in the Management of Hyperglycaemia of Non-Critical Hospitalized Patients

Hyperglycaemia affects more than 30% of adults hospitalized for non-critical illness and is associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Insulin therapy is widely used for its safety and efficacy. However, given the growing availability of new drugs and new classes of antidiabetic agents with benefits beyond glycaemic control, challenges arise regarding their use in the hospital setting. This article aims to review and summarize the most recently available evidence and recommendations on the role of non-insulin antidiabetic agents in the management of hyperglycaemia in hospitalized patients. Insulin therapy remains the method of choice. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors can be considered in mild to moderate hyperglycaemia. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have recently shown promising results, with high efficacy in glycaemic control and low risk of hypoglycaemia. There are concerns regarding the increased risk of acidosis with metformin use, especially in cases of acute illness, although there is no evidence to support its suspension in selected patients with relative clinical stability. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors should be discontinued in clinical situations that may predispose to ketoacidosis, including episodes of acute illness. The hospital use of sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones is not advised.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Analysis on 3 Years of Follow-Up

Background. Obesity is a prevalent condition associated with various comorbidities, impacting mortality, fertility, and quality of life. Its relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMII) is well established, with nearly 44% prevalence. Bariatric surgery has proven crucial for treating both obesity and DMII. The comparison between surgical techniques, such as sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), remains controversial in terms of glycemic control efficacy. This retrospective study aimed to assess DMII remission efficacy between SG and OAGB after 36 months. Methods. From January 2016 to September 2020, 201 patients who underwent SG and OAGB for morbid obesity associated with DMII were accurately followed-up with for 36 months, focusing on %HbA1c, DMII remission, anthropometric results, and nutrient deficiency. Results. Although DMII remission did not exhibit statistical significance between the groups (82% vs. 93%, SG vs. OAGB, p = 0.051), OAGB demonstrated a more robust association with glycemic control (Odds Ratio 0.51) throughout the entire follow-up and yielded superior anthropometric outcomes. Notably, nutrient deficiencies, excluding cholecalciferol, iron, and riboflavin, did not show significant intergroup differences. Conclusions. This study contributes valuable insights into the extended-term efficacy of SG and OAGB in DMII remission. The nuanced findings underscore the multifaceted nature of metabolic outcomes, suggesting that factors beyond weight loss influence diabetes resolution. Larger comparative studies are warranted to comprehensively address this issue.

Safety and Efficacy of Semaglutide Use in Diabetes during Ramadan Fasting: A Real-world Experience from Bangladesh

Aims: The study has been conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide during Ramadan fasting among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Bangladesh who intended to fast during Ramadan 2022. Methods: This was an open-label, single-center, two-arm parallel-group study. In this prospective observational study, patients were enrolled in two groups depending on treated with or without semaglutide for at least 3 months prior Ramadan. Initially, total 200 patients were enrolled at the first visit (4 weeks before Ramadan); among them, 58 subjects were in the semaglutide group (Group A) and 142 in other than the semaglutide group (Group B). At the end of the second visit (within 4 weeks after Ramadan) after data editing and cleaning, a total of 130 patients (55 subjects in Group A and 75 subjects in Group B) were included in the final statistical analysis. All of them were followed up for a total of 24 weeks including 12 weeks of screening period. The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%), weight loss (kg), hypoglycemia (number of events), and episodes of gastrointestinal (GI) upset (number of events) during Ramadan fasting. Results: Patients in the semaglutide group had better glycemic control after fasting of Ramadan compared to the control group (mean decrease in HbA1c level: 0.61% vs. 0.19%; P &lt; 0.001). In addition, more than 18% of the patients in the semaglutide group achieved good glycemic control (HbA1c &lt;7%), while the rate was 13.3% in the control group. Patients treated with semaglutide achieved a better weight loss than the nonsemaglutide group (2.97 vs. 1.38 kg; P &lt; 0.001). Although there was no significant difference in terms of hypoglycemic events in both the groups (P = 0.13), but the GI symptoms were more common in the semaglutide group than the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Among other secondary endpoints, the serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride were significantly decreased in the semaglutide group compared to the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Semaglutide showed better efficacy in glycemic control, weight loss, and dyslipidemia compared to other hypoglycemic drugs in patients with T2DM during Ramadan. Although patients receiving semaglutide reported fewer hypoglycemic episodes and GI upset events, they might be subjected to other medications or prolonged fasting. Semaglutide might be considered a suitable therapy during Ramadan fasting based on judicial judgment.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus pharmacological remission with dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide

Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, have both demonstrated efficacy in glycemic control, reducing blood pressure, body weight, risk of renal and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this observational, real-world, study we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combination therapy with those two agents over glycemic control. We thus obtained the data of 1335 patients with type 2 diabetes followed by 11 Diabetes centers in Lombardia, Italy. A group of 443 patients was treated with dapagliflozin alone, the other group of 892 patients was treated with the combination therapy of dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide. We analyzed changes in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to 6 months of follow-up, as well as changes in fasting glycemia, body weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic pressure, heart rate, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria. Both groups of patients showed an improvement of glycometabolic control after 6 months of treatment; indeed, the treatment with dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide showed a reduction of glycated hemoglobin of 1.2% as compared to the 0.5% reduction observed in the dapagliflozin alone group. Significant changes were observed in body mass index, fasting plasmatic glucose, blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL and albumin to creatinine ratio, with a high rate (55%) of near-normalization of glycated hemoglobin. Our real world data confirmed the potential of the oral combination therapy dapagliflozin with semaglutide in inducing pharmacological remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Glucagon-like peptide agonists: A prospective review.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as promising therapeutic options for addressing Type-2 diabetes, obesity, and related conditions. Among these, semaglutide, tirzepatide, liraglutide etc., all notable GLP-1RA, have gained attention owing to their favourable pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy. This comprehensive review aims to provide a detailed analysis of both the currently available GLP-1RAs in the market and those undergoing clinical trials. The focus is on examining their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy in glycemic control and weight management, safety profile, and potential applications. The review employs a systematic approach to gather information on GLP-1RAs. Relevant literature from the currently literature and ongoing clinical trials is thoroughly examined. Detailed scrutiny is applied to understand the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical outcomes of these agents. The review presents a comprehensive overview of the GLP-1RAs, highlighting their distinct mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic profiles, and clinical effectiveness in glycemic control and weight management. Safety profiles are also discussed, providing a holistic understanding of these therapeutic agents. The findings are discussed in the context of advancements in the field of GLP-1RAs. Potential applications beyond diabetes and obesity are explored, shedding light on the broader implications of these agents in managing related conditions. In conclusion, this review underscores the significance of GLP-1RAs, with a specific focus on semaglutide, in the management of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and beyond. By synthesizing information on their mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, this review provides valuable insights into the potential benefits these agents offer, contributing to the ongoing discourse in the field.

Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study.

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem. By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened. A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months. This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 ± 9.02 vs. 34.47 ± 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 ± 5.30 vs. 34.68 ± 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 ± 20.41 vs. 143.50 ± 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 ± 12.35 vs. 32.43 ± 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 ± 0.43 vs. 1.87 ± 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 ± 3.12 vs. 28.14 ± 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups. SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.

Evaluating Glycemic Control Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Small Molecule Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Danuglipron in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a significant global health concern, with Type 2 DM (T2DM) being highly prevalent. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), such as Danuglipron, offer potential benefits in T2DM management. This meta-analysis examines the safety and efficacy of Danuglipron, focusing on adverse outcomes and glycemic parameters. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for RCTs involving Danuglipron till August 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. Adverse outcomes (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, headache, decreased appetite, dyspepsia, dizziness) and glycemic parameters like changes in HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and body weight were analyzed. Four RCTs published from 2021 to 2023 were included. Both doses of Danuglipron were associated with diarrhea (RR=2.66, 90% CI: 1.32 to 5.35, p=0.02), nausea (RR=5.5, 90% CI: 3.4 to 8.88, p<0.00001), and vomiting (RR=5.98, 90% CI: 2.93 to 12.23, p=0.0001). The 120mg dose showed decreased appetite (RR=3.46, 90% CI: 1.57 to 7.62, p=0.01), dyspepsia (RR=4.04, 90% CI: 1.93 to 8.43, p=0.002), and dizziness (RR=5.08, 90% CI: 1.45 to 17.82, p=0.03). Reductions in HbA1C (SMD -1.09, 90% CI -1.39 to -0.8, p < 0.00001), FPG (SMD -1.10, 90% CI -1.46 to -0.75, p < 0.00001), and body weight (SMD -1.08, 90% CI -1.42 to -0.74, p < 0.00001) were observed for both doses. Danuglipron demonstrates potential for glycemic control and weight reduction in T2DM. Adverse outcomes include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite, with dose-related effects. Clinicians must weigh benefits against side effects when considering Danuglipron for T2DM management.

Dual GLP-1/GIP Agonist Tirzepatide for Diabetes and Obesity: A Review of the Evidence

Abstract Background Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) receptors agonist in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aim of this literature review is to comprehensively assess its clinical, biochemical, and safety profiles. Materials and Methods Search was conducted in several databases including PubMed from drug inception through end of 2022. Publications relevant to tirzepatide including randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis studies, post-hoc analyses, and conference proceedings were identified to examine its profile. Additional necessary references were explored and included as needed. Results Tirzepatide is a twincretin, acting on both GLP-1 and GIP receptors. Its performance in glycemic control and weight loss was greater than that of GLP-1 receptor agonist or insulin, comparatively. It demonstrated promising positive renal outcomes and was not associated with a higher cardiovascular risk, in addition to favorable effects on lipid, hepatic and blood pressure profiles. Most common adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects and hypoglycemia. Conclusion Novel dual GLP-1/GIP agonist Tirzepatide shows superior efficacy in glycemic control and weight loss in T2 diabetes mellitus patients. More evidence is needed to explore and compare long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes reflecting real-world clinical practice.

Global comparison of the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis from 107 randomized controlled trials

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and to provide guidance for clinical healthcare-giver. DesignNetwork meta-analysis (NMA). Setting and participantsRandomized controlled trials comparing the effect of NPIs with usual care, waitlist, or other NPIs on glycemic control in patients with T2D. MethodsThis NMA was guided by frequentist framework. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science were searched from their inception until January 2023. The primary outcome was HbA1c and secondary outcomes were cardiovascular risk scores and related psychosocial scores. Mean differences and standardized mean differences were pooled using NMA. Study quality was assessed with the Confidence in Network Meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 107 studies (10,496 participants) were included. The median sample size of the included studies was 64 (range, 10–563) and the median duration was 3 months (range, 1–24). Compared to usual care, all NPIs except acupuncture (MD: −0.28; 95 % CI: −1.02, 0.26) and psychological therapy (MD: −0.29; 95 % CI: −0.66, 0.08) showed significantly differences in improving glycemic control in patients with T2D. And according to the results of surface under the cumulative ranking analysis and Cluster ranking, meditation therapy was considered to the best choice when balancing the efficacy of glycemic control with self-efficacy and diabetes related problems, while nutrition therapy was considered to the best choice when balancing quality of life with risk of cardiovascular complications. ConclusionsThese findings validate the efficacy of NPIs for glycemic control in patients with T2D and suggest that healthcare-giver should consider both the efficacy of interventions and the psychosocial needs of patients when developing NPIs programs.

Real-world evaluation of glucose-lowering therapies and the use of weight-adjusted variable rate intravenous insulin infusion in the management of hyperglycaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome (REGULATE-ACS)

IntroductionAdmission hyperglycaemia in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is a strong independent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes post-ACS. We examined the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a modified, weight-adjusted variable rate intravenous insulin infusion (VRIII) and evaluated current practice of prescribing novel cardio-protective glucose-lowering therapies in patients presenting with acute hyperglycaemia across the ACS spectrum. MethodsREGULATE-ACS was an observational single-centre study of consecutive patients admitted with acute hyperglycaemia post-ACS between 2020 and 2021. Following updated local guidance on a modified VRIII, we evaluated its safety and efficacy in glycaemic control, cardio-metabolic complications including hypoglycaemia (blood glucose <3 mmol/L) and 30-day mortality. We also determined the prescription of glucose-lowering therapies pre-discharge. ResultsOut of 107 patients, mean age was 64.9 ± 12.2 years, 82% had known diabetes, and 15% newly diagnosed diabetes. 86.9% (n = 93) had an admission glucose ≥11 mmol/L. In patients treated with VRIII (n = 63/93, 67.7%), glucose improved from 17.5 to 9.0 mmol/L (IQR 7.1–12.1), which was 3 mmol/L lower (p = 0.03) than in patients not treated with VRIII (n = 30/93, 32.3%) where median glucose reduced from 12.6 to 12 mmol/L (IQR 8.6–13.9). No significant hypoglycaemia, arrhythmia or worsening pulmonary oedema associated with VRIII was found. Novel glucose-lowering therapies were initiated in 20/71 (28.2%) and 3/15 (20.0%) of patients with prior and newly diagnosed diabetes, respectively. ConclusionThis real-world analysis provides further support of efficacy, safety, and feasibility of a modified, weight-adjusted VRIII in managing acute hyperglycaemia in ACS. Despite established cardio-protective benefits of novel glucose-lowering therapies, <1/3 of eligible patients received such agents pre-discharge, demanding further research and awareness.

Poha consumption and Glycemic control, An experimental Study

Back ground of the study- A research study on poha consumption and glycemic control was conducted with the objective of assessing the efficacy of glycemic control. The population included patients with type-2 Diabetes Mellitus. They were allowed to continue their normal life pattern during the addition of poha as a diet. Meterials and Methods- A one group pretest post test design was used for the study. The sample size was 100. The setting was a selected village in Mangalore taluk in Dakshina Kannada district of Karnataka. Systematic sampling was used for the study. Results- The post test GRBS levels of all the patients were lesser than the pretest levels. Patients had no additional complaints. The study was done at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion- Poha is a part of occasional diet in south India. Due to the ignorance of glycemic control effect of this food, people do not consume it regularly. Daily consumption of this food is very effective in controlling hyperglycemia by slow release of glucose from the body. Large scale awareness has to be created among diabetic population regarding the efficacy of this food.

Efficacy of Personalized Diabetes Self-care Using an Electronic Medical Record-Integrated Mobile App in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundA system that combines technology and web-based coaching can help treat chronic conditions such as diabetes. However, the effectiveness of apps in mobile health (mHealth) interventions is inconclusive and unclear due to heterogeneous interventions and varying follow-up durations. In addition, randomized controlled trial data are limited, and long-term follow-up is lacking, especially for apps integrated into electronic medical records.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess the effect of an electronic medical record–integrated mobile app for personalized diabetes self-care, focusing on the self-monitoring of blood glucose and lifestyle modifications, on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn a 26-week, 3-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group trial, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of ≥7.5% were recruited. The mHealth intervention consisted of self-monitoring of blood glucose with the automatic transfer of glucose, diet, and physical activity counseling data (iCareD system). Participants were randomly assigned to the following three groups: usual care (UC), mobile diabetes self-care (MC), and MC with personalized, bidirectional feedback from physicians (MPC). The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c levels at 26 weeks. In addition, diabetes-related self-efficacy, self-care activities, and satisfaction with the iCareD system were assessed after the intervention.ResultsA total of 269 participants were enrolled, and 234 patients (86.9%) remained in the study at 26 weeks. At 12 weeks after the intervention, the mean decline in HbA1c levels was significantly different among the 3 groups (UC vs MC vs MPC: −0.49% vs −0.86% vs −1.04%; P=.02). The HbA1c level decreased in all groups; however, it did not differ among groups after 26 weeks. In a subgroup analysis, HbA1c levels showed a statistically significant decrease after the intervention in the MPC group compared with the change in the UC or MC group, especially in patients aged <65 years (P=.02), patients with a diabetes duration of ≥10 years (P=.02), patients with a BMI of ≥25.0 kg/m2 (P=.004), patients with a C-peptide level of ≥0.6 ng/mL (P=.008), and patients who did not undergo treatment with insulin (P=.004) at 12 weeks. A total of 87.2% (137/157) of the participants were satisfied with the iCareD system.ConclusionsThe mHealth intervention for diabetes self-care showed short-term efficacy in glycemic control, and the effect decreased over time. The participants were comfortable with using the iCareD system and exhibited high adherence.Trial RegistrationClinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea KCT0004128; https://tinyurl.com/bdd6pa9m

Association Between HbA1c Levels and Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Case-Control Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Claims Data.

BackgroundEvidence on the efficacy of glycemic control for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is limited in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite the known relationship between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and DPN, the parameters (e.g., mean values or variability) that play an important role have not been elucidated.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to explore factors associated with DPN, including long-term HbA1c parameters, among patients with type 2 diabetes, in a large-scale longitudinal study.MethodsWe conducted a case-control study using a medical claims database. We extracted data of patients with type 2 diabetes and disease records of DPN (indicating that they received treatment for DPN) and those without DPN records (controls), and matched for age, sex, index year, and duration since the first type 2 diabetes record. A logistic regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with DPN, and a receiver-operating characteristic analysis to estimate the optimal mean HbA1c target.ResultsOf 1,792,037 patients with type 2 diabetes, data from 1632 patients (816 per group) were analyzed. The mean HbA1c levels in the 3-year observation period were 7.2 ± 1.0% in the DPN group and 6.9 ± 1.1% in the control group. Elevated 3-year mean HbA1c levels were significantly associated with DPN records (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.06–1.42), while HbA1c variability was not significantly associated. The mean HbA1c levels that discriminated between patients with and without DPN records were 6.5% (unadjusted) and 7.1% (adjusted).ConclusionsThe development or progression of DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with the 3-year mean HbA1c level in real-world data.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-022-00309-3.