Efficacy Of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Research Articles

Novel mutation signatures in the prognosis of EGFR-TKIs targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients based on the 1000-gene panel sequencing.

The application of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be affected by somatic mutations. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of mutations on the prognosis and tumor markers of NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. 21 NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKIs were selected, and the targeted sequencing of the tumor tissues or whole blood samples with the 1000-gene panel was conducted to screen mutations. Afterward, functional enrichment analysis was performed based on mutant genes. Subsequently, the correlation between mutations and clinical indicators, prognosis, and tumor markers were analyzed. Finally, the prognosis after taking osimertinib was compared between NSCLC patients with EGFR p.T790M positive and negative mutations, and the EGFR p.T790M concomitant and uncommon mutations were screened. A total of 485 mutations in 251 genes were identified, in which MTOR, AXIN2, AR, EGFR, NOTCH1, and HRAS mutations were significantly correlated with PFS and/or tumor markers. There was no significant difference in PFS, therapeutic effect, and prognosis between EGFR p.T790M positive and negative patients who received osimertinib treatment. Besides, we also found 80 concomitant mutations and 54 uncommon mutations of EGFR p.T790M. AR, HRAS, EGFR, AXIN2, NOTCH1, and MTOR might be key genes to the prognosis of NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinib has certain efficacy in EGFR p.T790M negative NSCLC patients.

Efficacy of EGFR plus TNF inhibition in a preclinical model of temozolomide-resistant glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant adult brain tumor. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the standard of care and is most effective in GBMs that lack the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Moreover, even initially responsive tumors develop a secondary resistance to TMZ and become untreatable. Since aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is widespread in GBM, EGFR inhibition has been tried in multiple clinical trials without success. We recently reported that inhibiting EGFR leads to increased secretion of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and activation of a survival pathway in GBM. Here, we compare the efficacy of TMZ versus EGFR plus TNF inhibition in an orthotopic mouse model of GBM. We use an orthotopic model to examine the efficacy of TMZ versus EGFR plus TNF inhibition in multiple subsets of GBMs, including MGMT methylated and unmethylated primary GBMs, recurrent GBMs, and GBMs rendered experimentally resistant to TMZ. The efficacy of the 2 treatments was similar in MGMT methylated GBMs. However, in MGMT unmethylated GBMs, a combination of EGFR plus TNF inhibition was more effective. We demonstrate that the 2 treatment approaches target distinct and non-overlapping pathways. Thus, importantly, EGFR plus TNF inhibition remains effective in TMZ-resistant recurrent GBMs and in GBMs rendered experimentally resistant to TMZ. EGFR inhibition combined with a blunting of the accompanying TNF-driven adaptive response could be a viable therapeutic approach in MGMT unmethylated and recurrent EGFR-expressing GBMs.

Melanoma-associated antigen A11 reduces erlotinib and afatinib efficacy in head and neck cancer

Melanoma-associated antigen A (MAGE-A) proteins are members of the cancer/testis antigens (CTA), and the expression of these proteins is almost exclusively limited to malignant cells, making them an attractive treatment target. MAGE-A expression is correlated with poor overall survival in several cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Among others, MAGE-A11 was found to be associated with resistance to different antineoplastic and targeted compounds, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We searched The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database with a focus on MAGE-A and found that MAGE-A overexpression is a common event in HNSCC (27.5%). Furthermore, MAGE-A overexpression was correlated with significantly reduced overall survival (35.45 months vs. 64.78 months, P = 0.0173). In particular, MAGE-A11 overexpression was found in 9% of specimens. We then examined MAGE-A11 expression, the efficacy of EGFR and the EGFR mutational status and the effects of the pan-HER (human EGFR) TKIs erlotinib and afatinib in HNSCC cell lines. Next, we used a model of stable MAGE-A11 overexpression to demonstrate that MAGE-A11 impaired the efficacy of erlotinib and afatinib. In summary, our study provides evidence that MAGE-A11 contributes to erlotinib and afatinib resistance in head and neck cancer cell lines.

Effects of icotinib on advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different EGFR phenotypes.

Icotinib is the first oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor, which has been proven to exert significant inhibitory effects on non-small cell lung cancer in vitro. Clinical evidence has showed that the efficacy of Icotinib on retreating advanced non-small cell lung cancer is comparable to Gefitinib. However, different phenotypes of EGFR can affect the therapeutic outcomes of EGFR tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor. Therefore, our study focused on efficacy and safety of Icotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer of different EGPR phenotypes. Clinical data of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received Icotinib treatment from August, 2011 to May, 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival analysis and comparison. 18 wild-type EGFR and 51 mutant type were found in a total of 69 patients. Objective response rate of patients with mutant type EGFR was 54.9 % and disease control rate was 86.3 %. Objective response rate of wild-type patients was 11.1 % (P = 0.0013 vs mutant type), disease control rate was 50.0 % (P = 0.0017). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of mutant type and wild-type patients were 9.7 and 2.6 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median PFS of exon 19 mutated mutant patients was 11.3 months, mean PFS of exon 21 L858R mutated mutant patients was 8.7 months (P = 0.3145). Median overall survival (OS) of EGFR mutated patients had not reached. OS time of 13 wild-type patients was 12.9 months (P < 0.001). The common adverse reactions of Icotinib included rash, diarrhea, itching skin with occurrence rates of 24.6 % (17/69), 13.0 % (9/69), and 11.6 % (8/69), respectively. Most adverse reactions were grade I-II. Icotinib has great efficacy in EGFR mutated patients, making it an optimal regimen to treat EGFR mutated patients. Furthermore, most of adverse reactions associated with Icotinib treatment were tolerable.

Afatinib: A Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Afatinib (Gilotrif™, Giotrif(®)) is an orally administered, irreversible inhibitor of the ErbB family of tyrosine kinases. Afatinib downregulates ErbB signalling by covalently binding to the kinase domains of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 and HER4, resulting in irreversible inhibition of tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation; it also inhibits transphosphorylation of HER3. Afatinib is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations in the EU, and for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumours have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations as detected by a US FDA-approved test in the US. In two randomized, open-label, multinational phase III trials, progression-free survival was significantly prolonged with afatinib compared with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 3) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (LUX-Lung 6) in treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. The objective response rate was significantly higher with afatinib than with pemetrexed plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin, and patient-reported outcomes for symptoms such as cough and dyspnoea and certain health-related quality of life measures significantly favoured afatinib versus pemetrexed plus cisplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Afatinib also showed efficacy in EGFR TKI-naïve patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and activating EGFR mutations who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease, according to the results of the noncomparative, multinational, phase II LUX-Lung 2 trial. Oral afatinib had a manageable tolerability profile. EGFR-mediated adverse events (e.g. diarrhoea, rash/acne) were generally managed using dose reduction and delays. In conclusion, afatinib is a valuable new option for use in treatment-naïve or EGFR TKI-naïve patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and activating EGFR mutations.

Personalized targeted therapy for lung cancer.

Lung cancer has long been recognized as an extremely heterogeneous disease, since its development is unique in every patient in terms of clinical characterizations, prognosis, response and tolerance to treatment. Personalized medicine refers to the use of markers to predict which patient will most likely benefit from a treatment. In lung cancer, the well-developed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the newly emerging EML4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) are important therapeutic targets. This review covers the basic mechanism of EGFR and EML4-ALK activation, the predictive biomarkers, the mechanism of resistance, and the current targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The efficacy of EGFR and ALK targeted therapies will be discussed in this review by summarizing the prospective clinical trials, which were performed in biomarker-based selected patients. In addition, the revolutionary sequencing and systems strategies will also be included in this review since these technologies will provide a comprehensive understanding in the molecular characterization of cancer, allow better stratification of patients for the most appropriate targeted therapies, eventually resulting in a more promising personalized treatment. The relatively low incidence of EGFR and ALK in non-Asian patients and the lack of response in mutant patients limit the application of the therapies targeting EGFR or ALK. Nevertheless, it is foreseeable that the sequencing and systems strategies may offer a solution for those patients.

Abstract 3780: Autophagy targeting therapies in NSCLC: Autophagy induction vs. inhibition in combination with erlotinib shows Torin1 can sensitize NSCLCs with KRAS mutations to Erlotinib

Abstract In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are effective in the about 10% of cases that express mutant EGFR. The limited response of such therapies indicates the need to uncover additional therapeutic targets to increase the efficacy of EGFR targeted agents in a broader range of cases. One potential new targeted that may have therapeutic implications is the process of autophagy, which cells use to recycle proteins other cellular components. Currently, two opposing hypotheses exist concerning the role of autophagy in cancer. Autophagy may have tumor suppressive properties such as controlling cell growth, degrading damaged organelles, and serving as an alternate death mechanism. Conversely, it may function in tumor growth by enabling survival in conditions of low nutrients and oxygen, and protecting tumor cells against chemotherapy induced damage. The role of autophagy in cancer may also vary depending on cell type, tumor histology, oncogenotype, stage of tumor progression, or other factors. The type of treatment that will be most useful for the treatment of lung cancer will depend on which of these scenarios is most accurate in NSCLC cases. Approach: This study aims to analyze the role of autophagy in NSCLC by comparing autophagy inducing agents with an autophagy inhibitor for their ability to sensitize lung cancer cells to EGFR targeted therapy. A panel of NSCLC cell lines has been screened with an autophagy inhibitor (chloroquine) and autophagy inducers (Torin1 [Whitehead, DFCI] and rapamycin) alone and in combination with EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Response to drug treatments was tested using a five day MTS assay for both single agent and combination treatments. Liquid colony formation assays confirmed the sensitization to erlotinib by autophagy inducers seen by MTS assay. The effects of drug treatments on autophagic flux were determined using a ‘tandem fluorescent’ LC3 protein reporter assay (ptfLC3, Yoshimori), in which the percent co-localization of mRFP and EGFP signals can be used to determine the relative levels of autophagosome formation and degradation (Kimura et al.(2007) Autophagy 3(5):452-60). Conclusions: Chloroquine, had little impact on sensitizing the lung cancer cell lines to erlotinib. Combinations with Torin1 or rapamycin resulted in 10-20 fold sensitization to erlotinib in a subset of NSCLC cell lines which had wild type EGFR and oncogenic KRAS or NRAS and wild type or mutant p53. These results indicate that autophagy induction and not autophagy inhibition, may be an effective targeted therapy in combination with erlotinib for certain cases of NSCLC. However, because sensitization occurred in only a small subset of lung cancer cell lines, there is a need to determine biomarkers that may be used to predict in which cases sensitization will most likely occur. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3780. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3780