Effects Of Recruitment Maneuvers Research Articles

Effects of starting one lung ventilation and applying individualized PEEP right after patients are placed in lateral decubitus position on intraoperative oxygenation for patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFor patients receiving one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery, numerous studies have proved the superiority of lung protective ventilation of low tidal volume combined with recruitment maneuvers (RM) and individualized PEEP. However, RM may lead to overinflation which aggravates lung injury and intrapulmonary shunt. According to CT results, atelectasis usually forms in gravity dependent lung regions, regardless of body position. So, during anesthesia induction in supine position, atelectasis usually forms in the dorsal parts of lungs, however, when patients are turned into lateral decubitus position, collapsed lung tissue in the dorsal parts would reexpand, while atelectasis would slowly reappear in the lower flank of the lung. We hypothesize that applying sufficient PEEP without RM before the formation of atelectasis in the lower flank of the lung may beas effective to prevent atelectasis and thus improve oxygenation as applying PEEP with RM.MethodsA total of 84 patients scheduled for elective pulmonary lobe resection necessitating one lung ventilation will be recruited and randomized totwo parallel groups. For all patients, one lung ventilation is initiated the right after patients are turned into lateral decubitus position. For patients in the study group, individualized PEEP titration is started the moment one lung ventilation is started, while patients in the control group will receive a recruitment maneuver followed by individualized PEEP titration after initiation of one lung ventilation. The primary endpoint will be oxygenation index measured at T4. Secondary endpoints will include intrapulmonary shunt, respiratory mechanics, PPCs, and hemodynamic indicators.DiscussionNumerous previous studies compared the effects of individualized PEEP applied alone with that applied in combination with RM on oxygenation index, PPCs, intrapulmonary shunt and respiratory mechanics after atelectasis was formed in patients receiving one lung ventilation during thoracoscopic surgery. In this study, we will apply individualized PEEP before the formation of atelectasis while not performing RM in patients allocated to the study group, and then we’re going to observe its effects on the aspects mentioned above. The results of this trial will provide a ventilation strategy that may be conductive to improving intraoperative oxygenation and avoiding the detrimental effects of RM for patients receiving one lung ventilation.Trial registrationwww.Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2400080682. Registered on February 5, 2024.

The Effect of Recruitment Maneuver on Static Lung Compliance in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Centre Prospective Clinical Intervention Study.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of an alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) leads to a significant increase in static lung compliance (Cstat) and an improvement in gas exchange in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and Methods: A clinical prospective intervention study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): normal-weight (group I) and pre-obese and obese grade I (group II). Lung mechanics were monitored (Cstat, dynamic compliance-Cdin, peak pressure-Ppeak, plateau pressure-Pplat, driving pressure-DP) alongside gas exchange, and hemodynamic changes (heart rate-HR, mean arterial pressure-MAP) at six time points: T1 (induction of anesthesia), T2 (formation of pneumoperitoneum), T3 (RM with a PEEP of 5 cm H2O), T4 (RM with a PEEP of 7 cm H2O), T5 (desufflation), and T6 (RM at the end). The RM was performed by increasing the peak pressure by +5 cm of H2O at an equal inspiration-to-expiration ratio (I/E = 1:1) and applying a PEEP of 5 and 7 cm of H2O. Results: Out of 96 patients, 33 belonged to group I and 63 to group II. An increase in Cstat values occurred after all three RMs. At each time point, the Cstat value was measured higher in group I than in group II. A higher increase in Cstat was observed in group II after the second and third RM. Cstat values were higher at the end of the surgical procedure compared to values after the induction of anesthesia. The RM led to a significant increase in PaO2 in both groups without changes in HR or MAP. Conclusions: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the application of RM leads to a significant increase in Cstat and an improvement in gas exchange. The prevention of atelectasis during anesthesia should be initiated immediately after the induction of anesthesia, using protective mechanical ventilation and RM.

The Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers on Cerebrovascular Dynamics and Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

Optimization of ventilatory settings is challenging for patients in the neurointensive care unit, requiring a balance between precise gas exchange control, lung protection, and managing hemodynamic effects of positive pressure ventilation. Although recruitment maneuvers (RMs) may enhance oxygenation, they could also exert profound undesirable systemic impacts. The single-center, prospective study investigated the effects of RMs (up-titration of positive end-expiratory pressure) on multimodal neuromonitoring in patients with acute brain injury. Our primary focus was on intracranial pressure and secondarily on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and other neurological parameters: cerebral autoregulation [pressure reactivity index (PRx)] and regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2). We also assessed blood pressure and right ventricular (RV) function evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Results are expressed as the difference (Δ) from baseline values obtained after completing the RMs. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. RMs resulted in increased intracranial pressure (Δ = 4.8mm Hg) and reduced CPP (ΔCPP = -12.8mm Hg) and mean arterial pressure (difference in mean arterial pressure = -5.2mm Hg) (all p < 0.001). Cerebral autoregulation worsened (ΔPRx = 0.31 a.u.; p < 0.001). Despite higher systemic oxygenation (difference in partial pressure of O2 = 4mm Hg; p = 0.001) and unchanged carbon dioxide levels, rSO2 marginally decreased (ΔrSO2 = -0.5%; p = 0.031), with a significant drop in arterial content and increase in the venous content. RV systolic function decreased (difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion = -0.1cm; p < 0.001) with a tendency toward increased RV basal diameter (p = 0.06). Grouping patients according to ΔCPP or ΔPRx revealed that those with poorer tolerance to RMs had higher CPP (p = 0.040) and a larger RV basal diameter (p = 0.034) at baseline. In patients with acute brain injury, RMs appear to have adverse effects on cerebral hemodynamics. These findings might be partially explained by RM's impact on RV function. Further advanced echocardiography monitoring is required to prove this hypothesis.

Comparison of the tidal volume by the recruitment maneuver combined with positive end-expiratory pressure for mechanically ventilated children

The recruitment maneuver (RM) combined with PEEP to prevent atelectasis have beneficial effects. However, the change in tidal volume (VT) due to RM combined with PEEP in pediatric patients during the induction of general anesthesia is unknown. Therefore, we assessed the effects of RM combined with PEEP on VT. Pediatric patients were divided into three groups: infants, preschool children, and school children. The RM was performed by maintaining pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation (PC-CMV) with a 15 cmH2O and PEEP increase of 5 cmH2O. VT, respiratory function and hemodynamics were monitored before and after RM combined with PEEP. VT (mL) /ideal body weight (kg) before vs. after RM combined with PEEP were 9 vs 12 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the infants, 9 vs 11 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the preschool children, 8 vs 10 mL/kg (p < 0.05) in the school children, respectively. HR and BP before and after RM combined with PEEP increased by 2–3% and decreased by 4–7% in all groups. RM combined with PEEP resulted in an increase in VT per ideal body weight (1.1–1.2%). Therefore, this RM combined with PEEP method might improve the lung function in pediatric patients.

Year in Review 2015: Recruitment manoeuvres in ARDS

Refractory hypoxaemia is a problem in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of management of ARDS, this therapy itself can cause damage to the lungs due to high tidal volume and high airway pressures. Lung protective strategies are used to reduce damage to the lungs due to mechanical ventilation. Use of small tidal volumes can cause alveolar derecruitment and arterial hypoxaemia. Lung recruitment manoeuvre (RM) opens up collapsed segments of the ARDS lung but the collapse may reappear once the RM is complete. Although RM has been shown to improve oxygenation there is still no clear data showing improvement in clinical outcome. This review summarises the different techniques used for RM, physiological effects of RM on lung mechanics along with monitoring RM at the bedside.

Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model.

The most efficient recruitment maneuver (RM) for oxygenation in patients under mechanical circulatory support with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has not been described yet. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of three recruitment maneuvers on oxygenation and intracranial pressure. 20 sheep have been randomly grouped as follows: ARDS control, ARDS+TV(Tidal Volume), ARDS+CPAP(Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), ARDS+PEEP(Positive End Expiratory Pressure). Arterial blood gas tests have been done before ARDS, after ARDS, and 5,10, and 30 minutes after the maneuver. Intracranial pressures had been followed up. There was a statistically significant increase in Pa02 (Partial arterial oxygen pressure) values in all groups 5 minutes after RM (P > 0,01). There was a statistically increase in Pa02 values in all groups 10 and 30 minutes after the RM (P > 0,01). TV group had significantly more increase in PaO2 increase at the 30th the other groups (P > 0,01). CPAP group had more increase in intracranial pressures just after the RM and at 5 and 10 minutes after the RM. This increase was statistically significant (P > 0,01). All groups had similar intracranial pressure values 30 minutes after the RM. There was no statiscally signifciant difference between the groups (P > 0,05). ICP monitorisation should be carried out in patients with ARDS while performing recruitment maneuvers.

Effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres compared with sustained inflation or no recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThe majority of patients may experience atelectasis under general anesthesia, and the Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum can aggravate atelectasis during laparoscopic surgery, which promotes postoperative pulmonary complications. Lung recruitment manoeuvres have been proven to reduce perioperative atelectasis, but it remains controversial which method is optimal. Ultrasonic imaging can be conducive to confirming the effect of lung recruitment manoeuvres. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres by ultrasonography on reducing perioperative atelectasis and to check whether the effects of recruitment manoeuvres under ultrasound guidance (visual and semiquantitative) on atelectasis are superior to sustained inflation recruitment manoeuvres (classical and widely used) in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.MethodsIn this randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, women undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (UD group), sustained inflation alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (SI group), or no RMs (C group) using a computer-generated table of random numbers. Lung ultrasonography was performed at four predefined time points. The primary outcome was the difference in lung ultrasound score (LUS) among groups at the end of surgery.ResultsLung ultrasound scores in the UD group were significantly lower than those in both the SI group and the C group immediately after the end of surgery (7.67 ± 1.15 versus 9.70 ± 102, difference, -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -2.77 to -1.29], P < 0.001; 7.67 ± 1.15 versus 11.73 ± 1.96, difference, -4.07 [95% confidence interval, -4.81 to -3.33], P < 0.001;, respectively). The intergroup differences were sustained until 30 min after tracheal extubation (9.33 ± 0.96 versus 11.13 ± 0.97, difference, -1.80 [95% confidence interval, -2.42 to -1.18], P < 0.001; 9.33 ± 0.96 versus 10.77 ± 1.57, difference, -1.43 [95% confidence interval, -2.05 to -0.82], P < 0.001;, respectively). The SI group had a significantly lower LUS than the C group at the end of surgery (9.70 ± 1.02 versus 11.73 ± 1.96, difference, -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -2.77 to -1.29] P < 0.001), but the benefit did not persist 30 min after tracheal extubation.ConclusionsDuring general anesthesia, ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres can reduce perioperative aeration loss and improve oxygenation. Furthermore, these effects of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres on atelectasis are superior to sustained inflation recruitment manoeuvres.Trial registrationChictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100042731, Registered 27 January 2021, www.chictr.org.cn.

Effect of intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuver on intraoperative oxygenation and postoperative pulmonary function tests in patients undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a single-blind randomized study

BackgroundRobotic-Assisted Hysterectomies (RAH) require Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum, which further accentuate alteration in respiratory mechanics induced by general anesthesia. The role of Recruitment Maneuver (RM) as a lung-protective strategy during intraoperative surgical settings has not been much studied. We planned this study to evaluate the effect of RM on perioperative oxygenation and postoperative spirometry using PaO2/FiO2 and FEV1/FVC, respectively in patients undergoing RAH. MethodsSixty-six ASA I‒II female patients scheduled for elective RAH were randomized into group R (recruitment maneuver, n = 33) or group C (control, n = 33). Portable spirometry was done one day before surgery. Patients were induced with general anesthesia, and mechanical ventilation started with volume control mode, with Tidal Volume (TV) of 6–8 mL.kg−1, Respiratory Rate (RR) of 12 min, inspiratory-expiratory ratio (I: E ratio) of 1:2, FiO2 of 0.4, and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O. Patients in group R received recruitment maneuvers of 30 cmH2O every 30 minutes following tracheal intubation. The primary objectives were comparison of oxygenation and ventilation between two groups intraoperatively and portable spirometry postoperatively. Postoperative pulmonary complications, like desaturation, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, were monitored. ResultsPatients who received RM had significantly higher PaO2 (mmHg) (203.2+-24.3 vs. 167.8+-27.3, p < 0.001) at T2 (30 min after the pneumoperitoneum). However, there was no significant difference in portable spirometry between the groups in the postoperative period (FVC, 1.40 ± 0.5 L vs. 1.32 ± 0.46 L, p = 0.55). ConclusionThis study concluded that intraoperative recruitment did not prevent deterioration of postoperative spirometry values; however, it led to improved oxygenation intraoperatively.

The effect of recruitment maneuver on the development of expansion defect and atelectasis after lobectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background/Aim: In pulmonary lobectomy operations, the operation is performed with one-lung ventilation by collapsing the related lung. Postoperative expansion failure on the deflated side is a critical issue. We aimed to correct the expansion failure and atelectasis with the recruitment maneuver performed at the end of the operation. Methods: A total of 61 cases who underwent elective lobectomy under one-lung ventilation were included in this double-blind and prospective study. They were randomized into two groups comprising thirty and thirty-one cases. The first group included patients in whom the cycling recruitment maneuver (cRM) was performed, and the second group comprised patients who underwent the manual recruitment maneuver. Both groups were ventilated similarly during the one-lung ventilation period. After switching to double-lung ventilation, a standardized cycling recruitment maneuver was performed in the first group, and a high-volume manual recruitment maneuver with an anesthetic reservoir bag was used in the second group. Preoperative and postoperative inspiratory and hemodynamic parameters, wakefulness level, pain scores, developments of complications and durations of the hospitalization were noted. Expansion failure and atelectasis were evaluated both with chest radiography and thorax computerized tomography. Results: There was no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of age, smoking, duration of operation, preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), SpO2 levels, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters noted during the operation, invasive arterial pressure monitoring results, electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, modified Aldrete score (MAS), and visual analogue scores (VAS) (P>0.05 for all). The gender distribution and types of operations performed were also similar. No complications were observed. Expansion failure was seen in 23.3% and 48.8% (P=0.042) of the patients in the cRM and mRM groups, respectively. Additional procedures were needed in 4 patients (13.3%) in the cRM group and in 11 patients (35.5%) in the mRM group. The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the cRM group (P=0.045). Regression analysis revealed a 3.08-times increase in the incidence of expansion failure in the mRM group compared to group cRM. Conclusion: In pulmonary lobectomy operations, we observed that with the utilization of the recruitment maneuver which is performed after switching to double-lung ventilation, the rate of expansion failure, the need for additional procedures and duration of hospital stay decreased.

Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers and PEEP on Respiratory Failure After Cardiothoracic Surgery in Obese Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obesity may increase the risk of respiratory failure after cardiothoracic surgery. A recruitment maneuver followed by PEEP might decrease the risk of respiratory failure in obese subjects. We hypothesized that the routine use after heart surgery of a recruitment maneuver followed by high or low PEEP level would decrease the frequency of respiratory failure in obese subjects. In a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial, we assigned obese subjects (ie, with body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m2) in the immediate postoperative period of cardiothoracic surgery to either volume control ventilation with 5 cm H2O of PEEP (control group) or a recruitment maneuver followed by 5 or 10 cm H2O of PEEP in the intervention arms (RM5 and RM10 groups, respectively). The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with postextubation respiratory failure, defined as the need for re-intubation, bi-level positive airway pressure, or high-flow nasal cannula within the first 48 h. The study included 192 subjects: 65 in the control group (BMI 33.5 ± 3.2 kg/m2), 66 in the RM5 group (BMI 34.5 ± 3.2 kg/m2, and 61 in RM10 group (BMI 33.8 ± 4.8 kg/m2). Postextubation respiratory failure occurred in 14 subjects in the control group (21.5% [95% CI 13.3-35.3]), 21 subjects in the RM5 group (31.8% [95% CI 21.2-44.6]), and 9 subjects in the RM10 group (14.7% [95% CI 7.4-26.7]) (P = .07). The recruitment maneuver was stopped prematurely due to severe hypotension in 8 (12.1%) RM5 subjects and in 4 (6.6%) RM10 subjects (P = .28). There were no significant differences between the 3 groups for the frequencies of atelectasis, pneumonia, and death in the ICU. The routine use after heart surgery of a recruitment maneuver followed by 5 or 10 cm H2O of PEEP did not decrease the frequency of respiratory failure in obese subjects. A recruitment maneuver followed by 5 cm H2O of PEEP is inappropriate.

Effects of Recruitment Maneuver During Intraoperative Period

Effects of Recruitment Maneuver During Intraoperative Period

Ultrasonographic evaluation of the effect of recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure on diaphragmatic functions in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled study

ABSTRACT Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of recruitment maneuvers (RMs) and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on diaphragmatic function and atelectasis areas during pneumoperitoneum and the trendelenburg position in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) patients. Methods This prospective double-blinded randomized clinical study was conducted on 69 obese patients undergoing LSG. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups, Group I (control group) patients were mechanically ventilated without PEEP or RM, Group II received PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and Group III received 5 cmH2O PEEP, and intermittent four times RM consisting of maintaining airway pressure 40 cmH2O for 40 s. Primary outcome was diaphragmatic excursion (DE). Secondary outcomes were atelectasis area, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP), and any complications. Results DE decreased in all investigated groups after anesthesia induction till the end of procedure compared to pre-induction values, and it was statistically significant lower in control group compared to the two interventional groups with no significant difference between PEEP and PEEP+RM groups. Atelectasis volume according to lung aeration score was significantly increased in control group compared to the other two groups, while there was no statistical significant difference in PEEP+RM compared to PEEP in all the times except before induction of anesthesia there was no significant difference among the three groups. Conclusion The application of RM and PEEP are helpful for preserving DE and improving lung aeration during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Effects of Recruitment Maneuver on Functional Residual Capacity

Effects of Recruitment Maneuver on Functional Residual Capacity

Recruitment maneuver leads to increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. The recruitment maneuver (RM) is one of the interventions used for ARDS patients suffering from severe hypoxemia. RM works by opening the atelectatic lungs using high transpulmonary pressure. RM has therefore been widely used for many years in patients with ARDS. However, because of the high transpulmonary pressure used in this intervention, there are concerns about both biotrauma and hemodynamic instability. To assess the effects of RM in ARDS, we conducted a study using three groups of pigs (n = 6 in each group): group I (control), group II (ARDS), and group III (ARDS with RM). After measuring the baseline values, ARDS was induced by deactivating the surfactant with 5% Tweens lavage. For pigs of group III, the RM protocol used was positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 25 cmH2O and peak pressure of 45 cmH2O. Gas exchange, hemodynamics, the expression of cytokines in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and exhaled breath condensates (EBCs) were measured. The baseline measurements taken were similar across the three groups, and no significant difference was noted. After the induction of ARDS, PaO2 substantially decreased, while PaCO2, alveolar-arterial O2 gradient, pulmonary arterial pressure, lung water, level of cytokines in serum, EBCs, and BALF all increased. After RM, gas exchange and lung water level improved, but the level of cytokines in EBCs and BALF increased. Although RM led to an improvement in gas exchange, it may cause release of inflammatory cytokines in the EBCs and BALF.

The effects of recruitment maneuver during noninvasive ventilation after coronary bypass grafting: A randomized trial

ObjectivePulmonary impairment is a common complication after coronary artery bypass graft procedure and may be prevented or treated by noninvasive ventilation. Recruitment maneuvers include sustained airway pressure with high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with hypoxemia, favoring homogeneous pulmonary ventilation and oxygenation. This study aimed to evaluate whether noninvasive ventilation with recruitment maneuver could safely improve oxygenation in patients with atelectasis and hypoxemia who underwent a coronary artery bypass grafting procedure. MethodsThirty-four patients admitted to our intensive care unit undergoing mechanical ventilation after surgery, with ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen < 300 and radiologic atelectasis score ≥2, were included. The control group consisted of 16 randomized patients and the recruitment group consisted of 18 patients. After extubation, noninvasive ventilation was applied for 30 minutes 3 times a day with positive end-expiratory pressure of 8 cm H2O. The recruitment group received recruitment maneuver with positive end-expiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O and 20 cm H2O for 2 minutes each during noninvasive ventilation. We analyzed the arterial oxygen partial pressure in room air, radiologic atelectasis score, hemodynamic stability, and adverse events from extubation until discharge. ResultsArterial oxygen partial pressure increased 12.6% ± 6.8% in the control group and 23.3% ± 8.5% in the recruitment group (P < .001). The radiologic atelectasis score was completely improved for 94.4% of the recruitment group with no adverse events, whereas 87.5% of the control group presented some atelectasis (P < .001). ConclusionsNoninvasive ventilation with recruitment maneuvers is safe, improves oxygenation, and reduces atelectasis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass.

Effect of recruitment maneuver on early postoperative lung ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluation using electrical impedance tomography

Objective To evaluate the effect of recruitment maneuver on early postoperative lung ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Methods Thirty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰor Ⅱ patients of both sexes, aged 30-60 yr, with body mass index of 18-28 kg/m2, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were divided into 2 groups (n=15 each) using a random number table: control group (group C) and recruitment maneuver group (group R). Recruitment maneuver was performed with a pressure of 30 mmHg, lasting for 30 s, starting from 5 min after establishment of pneumoperitoneum and from the end of pneumoperitoneum in group R. EIT was carried out before anesthesia induction (baseline) and after extubation, and the percentages of area in center of ventilation (CoV), dependent silent spaces (DSS) and non-dependent silent spaces (NSS) were recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the percentages of area in CoV, DSS or NSS between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the baseline before induction, the percentage of area in CoV was significantly decreased, and the percentages of area in DSS and NSS were increased after extubation in group C, and the percentages of DSS and NSS were increased (P 0.05). Conclusion Recruitment maneuver can alleviate decrease in early postoperative regional lung ventilation, and it does not improve atelectasis and hypoventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Key words: Laparoscopy; Pulmonary ventilation; Positive-pressure respiration; Tomography

What are the effects of recruitment maneuvers for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation?

What are the effects of recruitment maneuvers for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation?

Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The effects of recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain uncertain. To determine if lung recruitment associated with PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance decreases 28-day mortality of patients with moderate to severe ARDS compared with a conventional low-PEEP strategy. Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 120 intensive care units (ICUs) from 9 countries from November 17, 2011, through April 25, 2017, enrolling adults with moderate to severe ARDS. An experimental strategy with a lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance (n = 501; experimental group) or a control strategy of low PEEP (n = 509). All patients received volume-assist control mode until weaning. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality until 28 days. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay; ventilator-free days through day 28; pneumothorax requiring drainage within 7 days; barotrauma within 7 days; and ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality. A total of 1010 patients (37.5% female; mean [SD] age, 50.9 [17.4] years) were enrolled and followed up. At 28 days, 277 of 501 patients (55.3%) in the experimental group and 251 of 509 patients (49.3%) in the control group had died (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.42; P = .041). Compared with the control group, the experimental group strategy increased 6-month mortality (65.3% vs 59.9%; HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.38; P = .04), decreased the number of mean ventilator-free days (5.3 vs 6.4; difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1; P = .03), increased the risk of pneumothorax requiring drainage (3.2% vs 1.2%; difference, 2.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 4.0%; P = .03), and the risk of barotrauma (5.6% vs 1.6%; difference, 4.0%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 6.5%; P = .001). There were no significant differences in the length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, a strategy with lung recruitment and titrated PEEP compared with low PEEP increased 28-day all-cause mortality. These findings do not support the routine use of lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration in these patients. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01374022.

Effects of recruitment manoeuvre on perioperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised single-blinded trial.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) needs a steep Trendelenburg position and a relatively high CO2 insufflation pressure, and patients undergoing RARP are usually elderly. These factors make intraoperative ventilatory care difficult and increase the risk of perioperative pulmonary complications. The aim was to determine the efficacy of recruitment manoeuvre (RM) on perioperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing RARP. A total of 60 elderly patients scheduled for elective RARP were randomly allocated to two groups after induction of anaesthesia; positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) was applied during the operation without RM in the control group (group C) and after RM in the recruitment group (group R). The total number of patients who developed intraoperative desaturation or postoperative atelectasis was significantly higher in group C compared to group R (43.3% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.034). Intraoperative respiratory mechanics, perioperative blood gas analysis, and pulmonary function testing did not show differences between the groups. Adding RM to PEEP compared to PEEP alone significantly reduced perioperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients undergoing RARP.

Alveolar recruitment maneuver attenuates extravascular lung water in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Background:The alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) has been reported to improve oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and may be related to reduced extravascular lung water (EVLW) in animals. This study was designed to investigate the effects of RM on EVLW in patients with ARDS.Methods:An open label, prospective, randomized controlled trial including patients with ARDS was conducted in hospitals in North Taiwan between 2010 and 2016. The patients were divided into 2 groups (with and without RM). The primary endpoint was the comparison of the EVLW index between the 2 groups.Results:Twenty-four patients with ARDS on mechanical ventilator support were randomized to receive ventilator treatment with RM (RM group, n = 12) or without RM (non-RM group, n = 12). Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. After recruitment, the day 3 extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) (25.3 ± 9.3 vs 15.5 ± 7.3 mL/kg, P = .008) and the arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) (132.3 ± 43.5 vs 185.6 ± 38.8 mL/kg, P = .003) both improved over that of day 1. However, both EVLWI and PaO2/FiO2 did not significantly change from day 1 to 3 in the non-RM group.Conclusion:RM is a feasible method for improving oxygenation and the EVLW index in patients with ARDS, as well as for decreasing ventilator days and intensive care unit stay duration.