Electroactivity of polymers used in energetic materials may result in charge separation that could result in safety concerns (unintentional ignition) or be exploited for multifunctional applications. We measured the flexoelectric properties of several polymers and energetic composites including poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoroethylene) [P(VDF-TrFE)], nanosized aluminum (nAl)/P(VDF-TrFE), poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) [P(VDF-HFP)], micron aluminum (μAl)/P(VDF-HFP), hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), ammonium perchlorate (AP)/HTPB, μAl/AP/HTPB, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The presence of flexoelectricity in PTFE (Teflon®) and the relatively high flexoelectric coefficient of P(VDF-HFP) (Viton®) measured in this work may help explain accidents involving the production and use of Magnesium-Teflon-Viton (MTV) that in many instances have been attributed to electro-static discharge. The addition of aluminum nanopowders to the P(VDF-TrFE) increased the flexoelectric coefficient by ∼30%. However, the addition of aluminum micrometer particles (10 wt. %) to P(VDF-HFP) decreased the effective flexoelectric coefficient, while an increase was observed when the aluminum loading was increased from 10 to 20 wt. %. The effective flexoelectric coefficient of HTPB and two propellant compositions (AP/HTPB and μAl/AP/HTPB) were measured to be in the same range as each other. The effect of particle addition (nAl, μAl, and AP) on flexoelectricity was different depending on the binder, further illustrating the complexity of flexoelectric properties in composite energetics. This may be somewhat explained by competing effects where particle additions (nAl, μAl, and AP) create additional strain gradients that contribute to flexoelectricity, but the particle additions also replace the mass of flexoelectric polymer binders (P(VDF-TrFE, P(VDF-HFP), and HTPB) with particles (nAl, μAl, and AP) that are less flexoelectric.
Read full abstract