Effects Of Oral Rinse Research Articles

Evaluation of the Effect of Oral rinses on Discoloration of Different Temporary Crown Materials

Evaluation of the Effect of Oral rinses on Discoloration of Different Temporary Crown Materials

Effects of Oral Rinse with Hangeshashinto Alone and Hangeshashinto with Honey for Oral Discomfort in Terminally-ill Cancer Patients

Effects of Oral Rinse with Hangeshashinto Alone and Hangeshashinto with Honey for Oral Discomfort in Terminally-ill Cancer Patients

Effect of Oral Rinses on Color Change Behaviour of Three Types of Provisional Fixed Partial Denture Materials

Objectives: The present study aimed to comparatively evaluate the color variationsof three different commercially available provisional restorative materials, usingcomputerized spectrophotometry before and after immersion in artificial saliva and three other different mouth rinses Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty samples (40 of each material; Revotek LC, TempSpan, Jet tooth shade) were prepared in the form of discs (10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness), and these samples were randomlydivided into 4 subgroups for the solutions; chlorohexidine, Tantum V and Oracin mouth washes and artificial saliva(n=10). The discoloration solutions were changed twice a day throughout the three weeks. The color values (L*,a*,b*) of each specimenwere measured before and after exposure with a Reflective spectrophotometer. Results: regardless to staining solutions, it was shown that TempSpan material group recorded the highest color change mean value (3.68±0.39ΔE) followed by Revotek LC material group mean value (1.56±0.27ΔE) while Jet tooth shade material group recorded the lowest color change mean value (1.4±0.46 ΔE).on the other hand, A. salivarecorded the highest color change mean value (2.78±1.2 ΔE) followed by Tantum V solution mean value(1.72±0.31ΔE) then Oracin solution mean value (1.5±0.4ΔE) while CHX staining solution recorded the lowest color change mean value (1.32±0.4 ΔE). Conclusions:1- All the bis-acryl resins and PMMA-based provisional materials showed clinically perceptible color changes after exposure to oral rinses. 2- Among the three provisional restorative materials, Tempspan was found to be significantly the least color stable material and the least stain was taken up by Jet. 3- There were no significant differences between the discoloration effects of Tantum V, Oracin and Chlorohexidine mouth washes on the three tested provisional materials.

The effects of oral rinse with 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine on oropharyngeal colonization and ventilator associated pneumonia in adults' intensive care units

BackgroundVentilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) which increases the length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and mortality. The present study used an oral care protocol and compared the effects of two different concentrations of chlorhexidine on reduction of oropharyngeal colonization and VAP. Materials and methodsThis study was performed on 114 patients from trauma, surgery, neurosurgery, and general ICUs randomly allocated to two groups under oral care with 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine solution. A multidisciplinary team approved the oral care protocol. Data was collected using a demographic information form, APACHE IV form, Beck oral assessment scale, mucosal-plaque assessment scale, and oropharyngeal swab culture. ResultsThe results showed a significant reduction in VAP (p=0.007) and oropharyngeal colonization (p=0.007) in the group under oral care with 2% chlorhexidine solution compared with the other group. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of oropharyngeal adverse effects (p=0.361). ConclusionOral decontamination with 2% compared to 0.2% chlorhexidine is a more effective method in the prevention of VAP and reduction of oropharyngeal colonization (especially gram-positive).

Effects of Oral Rinse using Lemon-Flavored Water with or without Rebamipide on Fluoropyrimidine-Induced Stomatitis

Aim: To examine the efficacy of oral rinsing against chemotherapy-induced stomatitis. Methods: Consecutive fluoropyrimidine-treated patients with stomach and colorectal cancer were enrolled from April 2009 to March 2011 (n=43; Group 1) and from January 2012 to December 2012 (n=45; Group 2). The incidence and severity of stomatitis were compared between Group 1 patients, who were instructed to gargle with lemonflavored water 6 times daily, and Group 2 patients, who did not receive any specific guidance. Among patients in the gargle group, we determined the rate of gargling compliance as well as quality of life (QOL) scores, and evaluated the impact of rebamipide use on patient outcomes. Results: The incidence of stomatitis was significantly reduced in Group 1 (14.0%) compared to that in Group 2 (33.3%) and its severity in the former group was milder. Among patients using lemon-flavored water, concomitant rebamipide use had no statistically significant impact on stomatitis incidence (with versus without rebamipide, 19.0% versus 9.0%), the rate of gargling compliance (96.4% versus 94.2%), or QOL scores. Conclusions: Oral rinse with lemon-flavored water is useful for the symptomatic control of fluoropyrimidineinduced stomatitis, regardless of the presence or absence of rebamipide.

Chemometric variance analysis of 1H NMR metabolomics data on the effects of oral rinse on saliva

Saliva is an easy to obtain bodily fluid that is specific to the oral environment. It can be used for metabolomic studies as it is representative of the overall wellbeing of an organism, as well as mouth health and bacterial flora. The metabolomic structure of saliva varies greatly depending on the bacteria present in the mouth as they produce a range of metabolites. In this study we have investigated the metabolomic profiles of human saliva that were obtained using 1H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) analysis. 48 samples of saliva were collected from 16 healthy subjects over 3 days. Each sample was split in two and the first half treated with an oral rinse, while the second was left untreated as a control sample. The 96 1H NMR metabolomic profiles obtained in the dataset are affected by three factors, namely 16 subjects, 3 sampling days and 2 treatments. These three factors contribute to the total variation in the dataset. When analysing datasets from saliva using traditional methods such as PCA (principal component analysis), the overall variance is dominated by subjects’ contributions, and we cannot see trends that would highlight the effect of specific factors such as oral rinse. In order to identify these trends, we used methods such as MSCA (multilevel simultaneous component analysis) and ASCA (ANOVA simultaneous component analysis), that provide variance splits according to the experimental factors, so that we could look at the particular effect of treatment on saliva. The analysis of the treatment effect was enhanced, as it was isolated from the overall variance and assessed without confounding factors.

Effectiveness of Oral Rinse with Chlorhexidine in Preventing Nosocomial Respiratory Tract Infections among Intensive Care Unit Patients

To evaluate the effectiveness of the oral application of a 0.12% solution of chlorhexidine for prevention of respiratory tract infections among intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The study design was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The study was performed in an ICU in a tertiary care hospital at a public university. PATIENTS. Study participants comprised 194 patients admitted to the ICU with a prospective length of stay greater than 48 hours, randomized into 2 groups: those who received chlorhexidine (n = 98) and those who received a placebo (n = 96). Oral rinses with chlorhexidine or a placebo were performed 3 times a day throughout the duration of the patient's stay in the ICU. Clinical data were collected prospectively. Both groups displayed similar baseline clinical features. The overall incidence of respiratory tract infections (RR, 1.0 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.60]) and the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia per 1,000 ventilator-days were similar in both experimental and control groups (22.6 vs 22.3; P = .95). Respiratory tract infection-free survival time (7.8 vs 6.9 days; P = .61), duration of mechanical ventilation (11.1 vs 11.0 days; P = .61), and length of stay (9.7 vs 10.4 days; P = .67) did not differ between the chlorhexidine and placebo groups. However, patients in the chlorhexidine group exhibited a larger interval between ICU admission and onset of the first respiratory tract infection (11.3 vs 7.6 days; P = .05). The chances of surviving the ICU stay were similar (RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.72-1.63]). Oral application of a 0.12% solution of chlorhexidine does not prevent respiratory tract infections among ICU patients, although it may retard their onset.

The Effects of Oral Rinses on Halitosis

Oral rinses are increasingly becoming an important treatment option for halitosis. There are few products on the market that have been thoroughly evaluated in clinical trials designed to test for the long-term efficacy of mouthrinses in the management of this disorder. This review looks at some of the potential causes and detection methods or oral malodor along with the bacterial, microbiological and biochemical processes involved. The article presents the available literature on clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and mechanisms of action of the different types of oral rinses used in the reduction of plaque and gingivitis, in addition to rinse studies geared more specifically to the treatment of halitosis.

お詫びと訂正

お詫びと訂正

Effects of rinses with an acidic calcium phosphate solution on fluoride uptake, caries, and in situ plaque pH in rats.

The effects of oral rinses on enamel fluoride uptake, caries, and plaque pH in rats were investigated by use of (1) an acidic calcium phosphate solution (CPS) saturated with dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD) and (2) a 1% fluoride solution. Osborne-Mendel rats, 19 days of age, were randomly assigned to one of four mouth-rinse treatment groups, with the two consecutively administered rinses being: H2O-H2O; H2O-F; CPS-H2O; and CPS-F. The treatments were administered on days 1 through 4, and the animals were provided with a cariogenic challenge throughout the study. The groups treated with F exhibited significantly higher mean levels of enamel-bound F than did the non-F groups. Furthermore, CPS significantly increased uptake of F by enamel when used as an adjunct to the F treatment. The caries scores of the CPS-F and H2O-F groups were not statistically different; however, a strong negative correlation was observed between enamel F content and caries scores, indicating that as more F was incorporated into the teeth, less caries formation occurred. Despite the significant differences in enamel F and caries scores among some of the treatment groups, post mortem in situ plaque pH drop in response to a sucrose rinse showed no differences among these groups.

The effect of oral rinses on organoleptic mouth odor ratings and levels of volatile sulfur compounds

A test mouthwash, saline rinse, and no treatment were evaluated for their effects on organoleptic mouth odor ratings (OR) and corresponding concentrations of volatile sulfur compounds (VSC) in sixty-two subjects. The mouthwash was significantly superior to the saline rinse and to no treatment in reducing OR and VSC for 3 hours, which was the duration of the study.