Effects Of Long-term Care Insurance Research Articles

Long-term care insurance coverage and labor force participation of older people: Evidence from China

Many scholars attribute the slowdown of economic growth to population aging and its negative impact on the size of the labor force. Meanwhile, government programs targeting an aging society can generate work disincentives. This paper studies the unintended labor market effects of Long-term Care Insurance (LTCI) among people of older age by exploiting the launch of the LTCI program in China. We find that policy-covered older adults decreased labor market engagement, significantly increasing the probability of exiting the labor market completely or not working full-time. We also document more substantial effects among those with low income, poor health, advanced age, and few children. The forgone wages of older adults account for >0.25% of GDP. These findings have policy implications for countries “growing old before getting rich.”

Effect of long-term care insurance in a pilot city of China: Health benefits among 12,930 disabled older adults

BackgroundThe surge of disabled older people have brought enormous burdens to society. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of long-term care insurance (LTCI) implementation on mortality and changes in physical ability among disabled older adults. MethodsThis was a prospective observational study based on data from the government-led LTCI program in a pilot city of China from 2017 to 2021. Administrative data included the application survey of activities of daily living (ADL), the baseline characteristics and all-cause mortality. Return visit surveys of ADL were conducted between August 2021 and December 2021. A regression discontinuity model was used to analyze the impact of LTCI on mortality. ResultsA total of 12,930 individuals older than 65 years were included in this study, and 10,572 individuals were identified with severe disability and participated in the LTCI program. LTCI implementation significantly reduced mortality by 5.10 % (95 % CI, -9.30 % to -0.90 %) and extended the survival time by 33.74 days (95 % CI, 13.501 to 53.970). The ADL scores of the LTCI group dropped by 2.5 points on average, while the ADL scores of those did not participated in LTCI dropped by 25.0 points. The heterogeneity analysis revealed that the impact of LTCI on mortality reduction was more significant among females, individuals of lower age, those who were married, cared for by family members, and who lived in districts with rich care resources. ConclusionsLTCI implementation had a favorable impact on the mortality and physical ability of participants.

The “spillover effect” of long-term care insurance in China on spouses’ health and well-being

This study examined the spillover effect of long-term care insurance (LTCI) on the health outcomes and well-being of spouses for Chinese middle and old-aged adults with expected LTC demand or actual care burdens. Using panel data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study between 2011 and 2018, we investigated the impact of the introduction of LTCI pilots across several cities on old individuals by using the difference-in-differences (DID) approach. We found a spillover effect of LTCI on the health and well-being outcomes of spouses of middle and old-aged individuals with functional limitations. It might due to the fact that LTCI could relieve economic burden by reducing out-of-pocket medical expenditures, which further affects health and well-being of spouses. The spillover effect on health and well-being was found to be stronger for male spouses and low-educated spouses. Spouses of the individuals aged below 80 years old and those live without adult children were more likely to benefit from the introduction of LTCI. Moreover, providing combination benefits seems to make spouses better off than offering direct services. Therefore, the results implied that the expansion of LTCI not only helped the care recipients themselves but could also improve the health and well-being of the spouses of functionally impaired older adults.

The effect of long-term care insurance on healthcare utilization of middle-aged and older adults: evidence from China health and retirement longitudinal study

BackgroundAs global ageing continues to increase and many countries face challenges from the growing demand for long-term care. Drawing on the experiences of developed countries, developing countries have explored their own suitable long-term care insurance and have shown strong potential for development and research prospects. However, due to their late start, relevant research is underrepresented in the global research network and still needs to be supplemented. The present study hopes to examine the effect of long-term care insurance on healthcare utilization among the middle-aged and elderly from an empirical perspective, using China as an example.MethodsPanel data from wave 3 (2015) and wave 4 (2018) of the nationally-representative China health and retirement longitudinal study were selected to obtain a sample of 661 processing participants and 16,065 control participants after matching the policy implementation time in the first pilot cities, and quantitative analysis was conducted using difference-in-differences propensity score matching estimator method to assess the net effect of long-term care insurance on health care utilization among the middle-aged and elderly adults.ResultsIn the matched frequency-weighted regression difference-in-differences estimator results, long-term care insurance had a negative effect on the number and costs of annual hospitalizations at the 5% significance level (key variable values of − 0.0568101 and − 1236.309, respectively) and a non-significant effect on outpatient service utilization (P > 0.05). Further exploration of the heterogeneous effect of it revealed that implementation had a more significant negative effect on hospitalization utilization for middle-aged and older people in the East and for those with higher levels of education or attended care.ConclusionLong-term care insurance has played a role in controlling hospitalization costs but has not yet achieved the expected effect in controlling outpatient costs. The policy effects in terms of regional distribution and education level and care situation have been variable. The treatment plan of long-term care insurance needs to be improved, the supply of resources for long-term care services should be increased, and the promotion of long-term care insurance and health science should be given attention.

Health effects of long-term care insurance on spouses of disabled people: a quasi-experimental study

BackgroundIt is still uncertain whether and how formal long-term care (LTC) systems affect the health status of family members. This paper examines the health effects of long-term care insurance (LTCI) on spouses of disabled people in China.MethodsThe data is from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS), a longitudinal survey of a nationally representative sample of Chinese residents aged 45 or older and their spouses, and China City Statistical Yearbook. Exploiting the regional variation in the implementation of LTCI in the first round of pilot cities in China, a difference-in-difference (DID) strategy is applied to identify the causal effects of LTCI on the health status of spouses of disabled people. We carefully identify the causal effects by controlling for city-level covariates, testing common trends between the treatment and control groups, combining propensity score matching (PSM) with DID, selecting the second round of pilot cities as the control group, controlling for city fixed effects (FE) instead of individual FE, and evaluating selection bias from omitted observable and unobservable factors.ResultsThe introduction of LTCI in China reduces the number of painful body parts and the self-reported health score significantly, indicating that spouses of disabled people get physical health benefits from LTCI coverage. However, the impact of LTCI on the depression index remains ambiguous and needs to be analyzed further. LTCI improves the physical health status of spouses of disabled individuals mainly through the time reallocation channel, while the impact of the consumption promotion channel has not been verified. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of LTCI on physical health are stronger for spouse caregivers and spouses with lower-level education and lower household income.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate that LTCI not only improves the health status of family caregivers by reducing their caregiving burden but also has beneficial health effects on non-caregiver family members. Policy designs of LTCI should emphasize the orientation of home and community-based care services (HCBS), which can not only satisfy the care preferences of disabled individuals, reduce the care burden on family caregivers, promote the health of all family members, but also prevent a large number of disabled individuals from choosing high-cost institutional care and reduce the financial burden of the LTCI Fund.

Dynamic Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance on Healthcare Expenditures: Evidence from South Korea

Long-term care expenses pose a large financial risk to the elderly. In 2008, South Korea introduced a public long-term care insurance (LTCI) program for individuals older than 65. We study the dynamic effects of the LTCI on various healthcare expenditures. We find that after the implementation of the LTCI, average prescription drug and outpatient expenditures of the elderly increased. Dynamically, we observe that the growth in these expenditures moderates. We also find suggestive evidence that after the introduction of the LTCI, the elderly may utilize LTC hospitals instead of inpatient hospital services. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the long-term effects of LTCI on health and healthcare expenditures of the elderly and the need to account for interactions between LTC and other types of healthcare services in policy design.

Long-term care insurance, mental health of the elderly and its spillovers.

The paper studies the effects of the long-term care insurance (LTCI) program in China on the mental health of older adults and the wellbeing of their families. We employ the staggered difference-in-differences approach based on the LTCI pilots from 2015 to 2017. First, we find the LTCI program improves older adults' happiness and reduces depression symptoms significantly. The effects on the improvement in memory and cognition are associated with the elderly with activities of daily living-related need for care. Second, the effects of LTCI are partially mediated through providing community services, relieving care burdens, and reducing the incidence of diseases. More importantly, LTCI coverage improves caregivers' physical health and social activities, reflecting its welfare spillover effects. Furthermore, the relationship between LTCI and mental health differs due to the difference in LTCI designs and older adults' demographic characteristics. This presents a need to consider mental health in the services and evaluation criteria of LTCI.

Different impact on health outcomes of long-term care insurance between urban and rural older residents in China

Long-term care insurance (LTCI) is garnering attention internationally and is being considered a public policy in a growing number of countries. Previous research has focused on the effects of LTCI in developed countries, ignoring the health outcomes of developing countries, especially in rural regions. Therefore, this study investigates whether different impact on health outcomes is present in the effects of LTCI between urban and rural residents in China. We employed a quasi-experimental design with data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey. The specific implementation time of each pilot city was sorted according to the LTCI policy texts, dividing these pilot cities into the treatment group and control group. Finally, difference-in-differences analyses were utilized to evaluate the health effects of LTCI between urban and rural residents, and the health effect in urban areas was further tested. The implementation of LTCI has effectively enhanced the self-rating health (SRH) of the entire group of residents; however, this effect may only be significant for the urban group. In particular, LTCI can increase the SRH of urban residents by 0.377 units compared to the urban residents without LTCI (P < 0.01). The result of the placebo effect test further verifies that LTCI could improve the health of residents to some extent. In China, LTCI may have triggered different impacts on health outcomes between urban and rural residents, and may not improve the SRH of rural residents and only prove efficacious for urban residents. Government and policy-makers should give more attention to the rural group as it needs long-term care the most.

The Economic and Health Effects of Long-term Care Insurance: New Evidence from Korea

The Economic and Health Effects of Long-term Care Insurance: New Evidence from Korea

The effect of long-term care insurance on the utilization of medical services among middle-aged and elderly people in China

The effect of long-term care insurance on the utilization of medical services among middle-aged and elderly people in China

Impact of long-term care insurance on the health status of middle-aged and older adults.

With the increase of aging population, long-term care insurance (LTCI) systems have become important for improving individuals' health. However, the effect of LTCI on health is unclear, especially in developing countries, owing to the lack of random policy shocks and comprehensive databases. This study investigates the Chinese LTCI pilot program, using four waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database (sample aged ≥45years) from 2011 to 2018. The recent difference-in-differences approaches for staggered design, which are capable of dealing with the negative weights issue, are used to investigate changes in health status, measured by self-rated health (SRH), (instrumental) activities of daily living, self-rated depression, and cognition, in pilot and non-pilot cities before and after LTCI implementation. Long-term care insurance has a significant average effect on SRH improvement and a long-term positive effect on cognition for middle-aged and older populations. This study provides the first evaluation of LTCI policy on health outcomes using the recent difference-in-differences approaches. It provides evidence for the overall health improvement achieved through the LTCI and offers positive reinforcement and potential areas for improvement in establishing LTCI worldwide.

The Economic and Health Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance: New Evidence from Korea

With a rapidly aging global population, Long Term Care Insurance (LTCI) for older people is a pressing policy issue. While long-term care services are designed to assist people with limited functional ability, the breadth of coverage considerably varies from country to country. There is a debate on the costs of such programs and the adequacy of benefits. Understanding the impacts of LTCI programs is central to informing LTCI policies as few countries have embraced them. In 2008, the Korean government initiated a national public contributory LTCI program to help older people lead more independent and secure lives and support family caregivers. We use the Korean Welfare Panel Study (KOWEPS) and a difference-in-differences model combined with propensity score matching to assess the effect of the program on self-rated health, healthcare utilization, household expenditures, and savings. While older adults in beneficiary households tend to have better self-rated health and receive fewer regular health check-ups, those with inpatient visits tend to stay longer in the hospital compared to those in non-beneficiary households. We find that LTCI beneficiary households have lower savings and higher out-of-pocket healthcare expenses compared to non-beneficiary households. Overall, results suggest a positive effect of LTCI on self-rated health but detrimental effects on household out-of-pocket healthcare expenses and savings for those with less comprehensive health insurance coverage, the near-poor, and older singles. LTCI requires further research and policy attention in Korea and beyond.

Does long-term care insurance reduce hospital utilization and medical expenditures? Evidence from China.

This study examines the effect of long-term care insurance (LTCI) on hospital utilization and expenditures among the elderly in China. We exploit the introduction of public LTCI in Shanghai, China, and implement a difference-in-difference technique to disentangle the effects of LTCI. We find that the introduction of LTCI significantly reduces the length of stay, inpatient expenditures, and health insurance expenditures in tertiary hospitals by 41.0%, 17.7%, and 11.4%, respectively. We find a greater effect on people over 80 years old. Outpatient visits in tertiary hospitals decrease by 8.1% per month after LTCI. The possible mechanisms are the substitution of long term care for hospitalization and health improvement. Our cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that every extra 1 yuan spent in LTCI will generate a decrease of 8.6 yuan in health insurance expenditures.

Effects of long-term care insurance on financial well-being

From a policy perspective, private long-term care insurance (LTCI) is often discussed as a potential solution to the need for long-term care (LTC) financing. However, given that financial protection is arguably the primary purpose of health insurance, there exists remarkably little empirical evidence on the financial protection effect of LTCI. We use U.S. Health and Retirement Study data to examine how LTCI affects key financial outcomes of insured individuals, including asset accumulation. Using an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for the endogeneity of LTCI purchase, we find that LTCI leads to consistently positive effects on assets, consistently negative effects on Medicaid and Food Stamps enrollment and parent-child financial transfers, and ambiguous effects on out-of-pocket (OOP) medical payments. These results suggest that although private LTCI is ineffective at protecting insured individuals against large medical expenditures, it improves the general financial well-being of insured individuals by reducing Medicaid-related disincentives to asset accumulation, motivating them to save more and reduce asset transfers.

2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures.

This study used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the ability of the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator and two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) estimators with varying forms of residuals to estimate the local average and population average treatment effect parameters in models with binary outcome, endogenous binary treatment, and single binary instrument. The rarity of the outcome and the treatment was varied across simulation scenarios. Results showed that 2SLS generated consistent estimates of the local average treatment effects (LATE) and biased estimates of the average treatment effects (ATE) across all scenarios. 2SRI approaches, in general, produced biased estimates of both LATE and ATE under all scenarios. 2SRI using generalized residuals minimized the bias in ATE estimates. Use of 2SLS and 2SRI is illustrated in an empirical application estimating the effects of long-term care insurance on a variety of binary health care utilization outcomes among the near-elderly using the Health and Retirement Study.

2SLS vs 2SRI: Appropriate Methods for Rare Outcomes and/or Rare Exposures.

Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we compare the two-stage least-squares estimator with two-stage residual inclusion estimators, with varying forms of residuals, to estimate the local average treatment effect parameter for a binary outcome and endogenous binary treatment model in the presence of binary covariates and a binary instrumental variable. We vary the rarity of both the outcome and the treatment and find different estimators to produce the least bias in different settings. We develop guidance for applied researchers and illustrate the utility of this guidance with estimating the effects of long-term care insurance on a variety of binary health care use outcomes among the near-elderly using the Health and Retirement Study. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The association between the utilization of long-term care services and mortality in elderly Koreans

It is necessary to confirm the effect of long-term care insurance (LTCI) by identifying changes in mortality, whether benefits are used or not, as well as the effects of in-home and institutional services on mortality. The goal of this study was to identify the association between service use and the mortality rate in elderly Koreans. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models and the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method to estimate the hazard ratio and survival probability for death while adjusting for covariates. We detected a 27.8% mortality rate at the 40-month follow-up period. Male gender, advanced age and activities of daily living were risk factors for mortality. In all models, the hazard ratio of participant death of those using long-term care services was significantly lower than for those who did not use these services. Among the service users, the hazard ratio for participant death of institutional service users was significantly higher than it was for in-home service users. This study also identified the impact of the transition from in-home services to institutional services. A primary goal of LTCI is to promote health and life stabilization in the elderly. To both delay and prevent institutionalization, it is necessary to develop assistive devices and effective in-home services and ensure access of these for elderly patients.

Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance on Financial Well-Being

From a policy perspective, private long-term care insurance (LTCI) is often discussed as a potential solution to the need for long-term care (LTC) financing. However, given that financial protection is arguably the primary purpose of health insurance, there exists remarkably little empirical evidence on the financial protection effect of LTCI. We use U.S. Health and Retirement Study data to examine how LTCI affects key financial outcomes of insured individuals, including asset accumulation. Using an instrumental variable (IV) approach to account for the endogeneity of LTCI purchase, we find that LTCI leads to consistently positive effects on assets, consistently negative effects on Medicaid and Food Stamps enrollment and parent-child financial transfers, and ambiguous effects on out-of-pocket (OOP) medical payments. These results suggest that although private LTCI is ineffective at protecting insured individuals against large medical expenditures, it improves the general financial well-being of insured individuals by reducing Medicaid-related disincentives to asset accumulation, motivating them to save more and reduce asset transfers.

The Effect of Long-Term Care Insurance on Labor Supply

The Effect of Long-Term Care Insurance on Labor Supply

Indirect Fiscal Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance

Informal care by close family members is the main pillar of most longterm care systems. However, due to demographic ageing the need for long-term care is expected to increase while the informal care potential is expected to decline. From a budgetary perspective, informal care is often viewed as a cost-saving alternative to subsidized formal care. This view, however neglects that many family carers are of working age and face the difficulty to reconcile care and paid work which might entail sizable indirect fiscal effects related to forgone tax revenues, lower social security contributions and higher transfer payments. In this paper we use a structural model of labor supply and the choice of care arrangement to quantify these indirect fiscal effects of informal care. Moreover based on the model we discuss the fiscal effects related to non-take up of formal care.