Effects Of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines Research Articles

The Use of Cultured Primary Bovine Colon Epithelial Cells as a Screening Model to Detect Genotoxic Effects of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines in the Comet Assay

Isolated epithelial cells from the bovine colon were maintained in dividing monolayer cultures and used as a model system for colon tissue in in vitro toxicological studies. The cytotoxic effects of the heterocyclic aromatic amines 2-amino-3-methylimidazo [4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhiP) were investigated in these cells and IC50 values were determined by inhibition of neutral red uptake into the cultured cells. Although PhiP was not cytotoxic up to concentrations of 500 μM, IQ was cytotoxic above 300 μM. The induction of DNA strand breaks in cultured bovine epithelial colon cells was determined using the alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) technique, and subsequently, the DNA damage was used as a determinant of genotoxic effects of the heterocyclic aromatic amines in order to establish this system for detection of adverse effects of chemicals in a model system for the colon. In the absence of an external enzymatic metabolizing system (S9 mix) both amines did not induce DNA strand breaks. When S9 mix was used, PhiP induced DNA strand breaks above 10 μM whereas IQ did not show any significant effect at 300 μM. This cell culture system was found to be a useful screening system for testing of compounds that are considered to affect colonic tissue.

Prevention of heterocyclic amine-induced DNA damage in colon and liver of rats by different lactobacillus strains

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of four different lactobacillus (LB) strains, namely Lactobacillus bulgaricus 291, Streptococcus thermophilus F4, S.thermophilus V3 and Bifidobacterium longum BB536, which are used for the production of yogurt, on the DNA-damaging effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCAs). Male F344 rats were treated orally with HCA mixtures containing 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline, 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole and 2-amino-3-methyl-3H- imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline, which were representative of the HCA contents found in fried beef ('beef mix') and chicken ('chicken mix'). Suspensions of LB were given by gavage to the animals simultaneously with and at different time periods before administration of the HCAs. Subsequently, the extent of DNA migration was measured in colon and liver cells in single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assays. All four strains caused complete inhibition of DNA damage induced with beef mix after administration of 1 x 1010 LB cells/animal, whereas with chicken mix only marginal (non-significant) effects were seen. The inhibition of beef-induced DNA damage was dose dependent and was still significant when 1 x 107 cells/animal were administered. Kinetics studies showed that the protective effects were still significant when LB was given 12 h before the beef mix. A comparison of the present results with chemical analytical data from in vitro experiments suggests that the strong reduction in DNA migration seen in the animals can be only partly explained by direct binding effects. The results of the present study show that LB are highly protective against the genotoxic effects of HCAs under conditions which are relevant for humans and provide a possible explanation for the reduced colon cancer rates observed in some studies in individuals with either high LB counts in their feces or with a high consumption of LB-containing foods.

Development and application of test methods for the detection of dietary constituents which protect against heterocyclic aromatic amines

This article describes the development and use of assay models in vitro (genotoxicity assay with genetically engineered cells and human hepatoma (HepG2) cells) and in vivo (genotoxicity and short-term carcinogenicity assays with rodents) for the identification of dietary constituents which protect against the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAs). The use of genetically engineered cells expressing enzymes responsible for the bioactivation of HAs enables the detection of dietary factors that inhibit the metabolic activation of HAs. Human derived hepatoma (HepG2) cells are sensitive towards HAs and express several enzymes [glutathione S-transferase (GST), N-acetyltransferase (NAT), sulfotransferase (SULT), UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT), and cytochrome P450 isozymes] involved in the biotransformation of HAs. Hence these cells may reflect protective effects, which are due to inhibition of activating enzymes and/or induction of detoxifying enzymes. The SCGE assay with rodent cells has the advantage that HA-induced DNA damage can be monitored in a variety of organs which are targets for tumor induction by HAs. ACF and GST-P + foci constitute preneoplastic lesions that may develop into tumors. Therefore, agents that prevent the formation of these lesions may be anticarcinogens. The foci yield and the sensitivity of the system could be substantially increased by using a modified diet. The predictive value of the different in vitro and in vivo assays described here for the identification of HA-protective dietary substances relevant for humans is probably better than that of conventional in vitro test methods with enzyme homogenates. Nevertheless, the new test methods are not without shortcomings and these issues are critically discussed in the present article.

Impact of bacteria in dairy products and of the intestinal microflora on the genotoxic and carcinogenic effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines

This article gives a short overview on the present state of knowledge of the effects of the intestinal microflora on the health hazards of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAs). Results of single cell gel electrophoresis assays with conventional, germ free and human flora associated rats indicate that the presence of intestinal microorganisms strongly enhances the induction of DNA-damage in colon and liver cells by IQ. Furthermore, it was found that supplementation of the feed with Lactobacilli attenuates the induction of colon cancer by this same amine. These recent findings suggest that the intestinal microflora and lactic acid bacilli in dairy products strongly affect the health risks of HAs. Nevertheless, most previous experiments with HAs focused on the involvement of mammalian enzymes in the biotransformation of these compounds and only a few articles are available which concern interactions of bacteria with HAs. Some of these studies suggested that the formation of directly mutagenic hydroxy-metabolites of the amines by fecal bacteria might be an important activation pathway but it turned out that the hydroxy-derivative of IQ is not genotoxic in mammalian cells and does not cause colon cancer in laboratory rodents. There is some evidence that hydrolysis of HA-metabolites by bacterial ß-glucuronidase might play a role in the activation of HAs but experimental data are scarce and no firm conclusions can be drawn at present. The most important detoxification mechanism appears to be the direct binding of the HAs to the cell walls of certain bacterial strains contained in fermented foods. It was shown that these effects do also take place under physiologically relevant conditions. Overall, it seems that intestinal bacteria play a key role in the activation and detoxification of HAs which has been an area of research long ignored. The elucidation of these mechanisms may enable the development of biomarkers for colon cancer risk and nutritional strategies of protection.

Search for Compounds That Inhibit the Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Effects of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines

Over the last 30 years approximately 160 reports have been published on dietary compounds that protect from the mutagenic and carcinogenic effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs). In the first section of this review, the current state of knowledge is briefly summarized. Based on the evaluation of the available data, various protective mechanisms are described, and the use of different methodologies for the detection of protective effects is critically discussed. In most antimutagenicity studies (>70%) bacterial indicators (predominantly Salmonella strain TA98) were used, and about 600 individual compounds and complex mixtures have been identified that attenuate the effects of HAAs. The most frequently used in vivo method to detect protective effects are adduct measurements; anticarcinogenic dietary factors were identified by aberrant crypt foci assays and liver foci tests with rats. The mechanisms of protection include inactivation of HAAs and their metabolites by direct binding, inhibition of enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of the amines, induction of detoxifying enzymes, and interaction with DNA repair processes. The detection spectrum of conventional in vitro mutagenicity assays with metabolically incompetent indicator cells is limited. These procedures reflect only simple mechanisms such as direct binding of the HAAs to pyrroles and fibers. It has been shown that these compounds are also effective in rodents. More complex mechanisms, namely, interactions with metabolic activation reactions are not adequately represented in in vitro assays with exogenous enzyme homogenates, and false-negative as well as false-positive results may be obtained. More appropriate approaches for the detection of protective effects are recently developed test systems with metabolically competent cells such as the human Hep G2 line or primary hepatocytes. SCGE tests and DNA adduct measurements with laboratory rodents enable the detection of antigenotoxic effects in different organs, including those that are targets for tumor induction by the amines. Medium term assays based on aberrant crypt foci in colon and liver foci tests have been used to prove that certain compounds that prevented DNA damage by HAAs also reduced their carcinogenic effects. These experiments are costly and time consuming and, due to the weak induction capacity of the amines, only pronounced anticar-cinogenic effects can be detected. Over the years, a large bulk of data on HAA protective compounds has accumulated, but only for a few (e.g., fibers, pyrroles, constituents of teas, and lactic acid bacteria) is there sufficient evidence to support the assumption that they are protective in humans as well.

Genotoxic effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines in human derived hepatoma (HepG2) cells.

In order to study the mutagenic effects of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs) in cells of human origin, five compounds, namely 2-amino-3-methyl-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), 2-amino-3, 4-dimethyl-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ), 2-amino-3, 8-dimethyl-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx), the pyridoimidazo derivative 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) and 3-amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido[4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1), were tested in micronucleus (MN) assays with a human derived hepatoma (HepG2) cell line. All HAAs caused significant, dose-dependent effects. The activities of IQ, MeIQ, MeIQx and PhIP were similar (lowest effective concentrations 25-50 microM), whereas Trp-P-1 was effective at a dose of >/=2.1 microM. In addition, the HAAs were tested in MN assays with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and in Salmonella strain YG1024 using HepG2 cell homogenates as an activation mix. In the CHO experiments, positive results were obtained with Trp-P-1 and PhIP, whereas the other compounds were devoid of activity under all experimental conditions. The discrepancy in the responsivity of the two cell lines is probably due to differences in their acetylation capacity: enzyme measurements with 2-aminofluorene as a substrate revealed that the cytosolic acetyltransferase activity in the HepG2 cells is approximately 40-fold higher than that of the CHO cells. In the bacterial assays all five HAAs gave positive results but the ranking order was completely different from that seen in the HepG2/MN experiments (IQ > MeIQ > Trp-P-1 >/= MeIQx >> PhIP) and the mutagenic potencies of the various compounds varied over several orders of magnitude. The order obtained in bacterial tests with rat liver S9 mix was more or less identical to that seen in the tests with HepG2 cell homogenates but the concentrations of the amines required to give positive results were in general substantially lower (10(-5)-10(-1) microM). Overall, the results of the present study indicate that MN/HepG2 tests might reflect the mutagenic effects of HAAs more adequately than other in vitro mammalian cell systems due to the presence of enzymes involved in the metabolic conversion of the amines.