AbstractBackgroundLimbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC) is the third leading cause of late‐life dementia. However, its pathophysiology remains largely unknown, and the relationship of LATE‐NC with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and frontotemporal lobar degeneration‐TDP (FTLD‐TDP) remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of LATE‐NC.MethodDeceased participants of European ancestry from the Religious Orders Study, the Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP, n = 1,379), and the Adult Changes in Thought study (ACT, n = 459) were included in our study. The primary phenotypes were LATE‐NC burden (a multi‐regional semi‐quantitative TDP‐43 composite, continuous) in ROSMAP, and the presence/absence of LATE‐NC (binary) in ACT, assessed with post‐mortem TDP‐43 immunohistochemistry. Quantitative amyloid‐β (Aβ) and paired helical filament tau (PHFtau) burden were also examined in ROSMAP. GWAS was performed using linear (ROSMAP) or logistic (ACT) additive models. We controlled age, sex, genotyping platforms, and the first three genotype principal components. Sample size‐weighted GWAS meta‐analysis (total n = 1,838) was performed by combining p‐values considering the direction of the association. Confounding and moderating effects of AD pathology on LATE‐NC risk variants were examined in ROSMAP.ResultWe observed two genome‐wide significant risk loci (p<5.0×10−8) in APOE (ε4) and SHANK2 (s146617441G, allele frequency 0.021). In ROSMAP, APOE ε4 was associated with higher LATE‐NC burden after controlling for quantitative Aβ and PHFtau (beta = 0.27, p = 7.3×10−6), and the APOE ε4 – LATE‐NC association was present in the subgroup without detectable Aβ (n = 170, beta = 0.50, p = 0.025). rs146617441G was not directly associated with quantitative Aβ or tau. Instead, rs146617441G×Aβ interaction term was associated with higher LATE‐NC burden (beta = 0.25, p = 0.032), suggesting the synergy between Aβ‐dependent and LATE‐NC‐specific pathways in LATE‐NC pathogenesis. Three additional loci reached a pre‐specified suggestive p‐value threshold (p<1.0×10−6; CMTM7 [rs56284874G], RNF145 [rs111653954T], and CACNA2D3 [rs71303704C]). A previously reported FTLD‐TDP risk locus in TMEM106B (rs1990622A) showed a weaker positive association with LATE‐NC (meta‐analysis p = 9.6×10−4).ConclusionOur GWAS revealed LATE‐NC‐specific risk loci (SHANK2 and other suggestive loci). The unique genetic architecture of LATE‐NC further supports the distinction between LATE‐NC and FTLD‐TDP, and the AD‐independent effect of APOE ε4 on LATE‐NC highlights the pleiotropic role of APOE in neurodegeneration.