Direct drilling of sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) into an autumn sown cover crop may reduce field work in spring and environmental damage, such as soil erosion and nitrate leaching, but the balance of its negative and positive effects on crop establishment is unknown. This study compared the effects of drilling sugar beet directly into a cover crop of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) or rye ( Secale cereal L.), or after conventional tillage in spring, on soil physical conditions and crop establishment. The experiments were conducted over 4 years in the north of France on three soil types: chalky soil (rendzina), loam soil (calcic cambisol) and silt loam soil (gleyic luvisol). Direct drilling caused less soil compaction than conventional drilling; the wheel tracks for seed bed preparation were made in drier conditions for direct drilling because of the change in tillage time (autumn for direct drilling vs. spring for conventional drilling). Seed bed structure, temperature and water content, and seed placement were very similar for the two drilling techniques (except in the silt loam soil) because of soil tillage done by the sugar beet seed drill and removal of cover crop residues over the sugar beet rows. Final emergence percentage was lower with direct drilling because of predator damage (by skylarks ( Alauda arvensis) and/or field mice ( Apodemus sylvaticus). Seedling growth after emergence was slower with direct drilling. The negative effects of direct drilling on sugar beet establishment may be counteracted by increasing the seed density, or by its positive effects on soil structure and consequently the possibility to sow sugar beet earlier. Because of its environmental advantages, direct drilling of sugar beet into a cover crop is an interesting technique for large farms with heavy work loads in spring in areas where the soil has a high aggregate stability.
Read full abstract