Effective Systemic Therapy Research Articles

Is pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) a surgical disease? A large healthcare system review

IntroductionPancreatic cancer represents an increasing cause of cancer-related deaths. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreas cancer. Optimal treatment is not well-defined. This review aims to provide a detailed analysis of the natural history, management, and outcomes of the patients with PASC within a single large healthcare system. Materials and methodsA large healthcare database was used to retrospectively identify all patients with histological diagnosis of PASC from 2010 to 2020. The cohort was evaluated as a whole and according to the following management modalities: operative, non-metastatic non-operative, and patients with metastatic disease. Abstracted data included patient characteristics, oncologic characteristics at presentation, and details of surgical and non-surgical treatment. ResultsIn total, 60 patients with PASC were identified. All patients had confirmed histopathological diagnosis of PASC. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 70.9 years, and 28 patients were male (46.7 %). Most patients presented with pancreas head tumors (60 %). Thirty-four patients presented with non-metastatic disease (56.6 %). The operative group consisted of 17 patients (28.3 %). Most patients received adjuvant systemic therapy (70.6 %). Majority of patients experienced recurrence (76.5 %), with median time to recurrence at 6.5 months. Median overall survival in the operative group was 19.1 months. Seventeen patients with non-metastatic disease (28.3 %) did not undergo resection. Median overall survival of this cohort was 3.3 months. Systemic chemotherapy was used in 8 patients. Approximately half of patients with non-metastatic disease (9/17) did not receive any treatment due to rapid physical deterioration or poor functional status at baseline. Median survival for the non-treatment group was 1.7 months. At presentation, 26 patients (43.3 %) had metastatic disease. Most common site of metastasis was the liver. Median survival for patients with metastatic disease was 3.1 months. DiscussionPASC is a distinct entity from glandular PDAC, and it appears to be a more aggressive disease process. Complete resection confers survival benefit but is not curative. Furthermore, few patients undergo surgery, even with seemingly resectable disease. Systemic therapy administration is limited in many patients due to physiologic decline. Dismal clinical course and poor survival is universal among all patients who do not undergo any treatment modality, regardless of metastatic status. Globally grim prognosis appears to be due early systemic effects, disease progression and lack of effective systemic therapy. ConclusionsPASC remains a poorly understood cancer and portends particularly poor prognosis. It is associated with a rapid clinical decline, poor response to systemic therapy, early recurrence, and poor overall survival. However, ability to treat with surgery and chemotherapy may best prolong survival. SynopsisPancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. In this study, we evaluated 60 patients with PASC. PASC is a systemic disease characterized by rapid clinical decline, poor response to systemic therapy, early recurrence, and poor survival. Despite resection or systemic therapy, patients succumb rapidly.

A phase II study of atezolizumab, pertuzumab, and high-dose trastuzumab for central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases have few effective systemic therapy options. In a prior study, pertuzumab with high-dose trastuzumab demonstrated a high clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the central nervous system (CNS) in patients with brain metastases. The current trial evaluated whether the addition of atezolizumab to this regimen would produce further improvements in CNS response. This was a single-arm, multi-center, phase II trial of atezolizumab, pertuzumab, and high-dose trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Participants received atezolizumab 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks (q3w), pertuzumab (loading dose 840 mg IV, then 420 mg IV q3w), and high-dose trastuzumab (6 mg/kg IV weekly for 24 weeks, then 6 mg/kg IV q3w). The primary endpoint was CNS overall response rate (ORR) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. Key secondary endpoints included CBR, overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of the combination. Among 19 enrolled participants, two had a confirmed intracranial partial response for a CNS-ORR of 10.5% (90% CI: 1.9%-29.6%). The study did not meet the prespecified efficacy threshold and was terminated early. The CBR was 42.1% at 18 weeks and 31.6% at 24 weeks. Seven patients (36.8%) required a dose delay or hold, and the most frequent any-grade adverse events were diarrhea (26.3%) and fatigue (26.3%). The addition of atezolizumab to pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab does not result in improved CNS responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

Survival prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients with simultaneous brain metastases and poor performance status at initial presentation

PurposeAlthough the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly progressed recently, there is little evidence of treatment for patients with symptomatic brain metastases (BM) and poor performance status (PS). However, in symptomatic BM patients, appropriate upfront intracranial treatment can often lead to rapid improvement in PS and effective systemic therapy. Thus, this study investigated the prognostic factors for the survival of poor PS NSCLC patients with synchronous BM. MethodsData of patients with BM and Karnofsky PS (KPS) ≤70 at the first diagnosis of NSCLC who were treated in our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021 were reviewed. Patient survival was compared among patients stratified by type of first-line regimen of systemic treatment. Correlations between patient characteristics and survival were examined. ResultsFifty patients receiving aggressive treatment were enrolled. The median survival times for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), and chemotherapy alone groups were 19 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.8–68.5), 19 (3.0–62.0), and 13 (1.2–24.8) months, respectively. Survival in the TKI and ICI groups was significantly longer than in the chemotherapy alone group (p = 0.046, TKI vs. chemo; p = 0.022, ICI vs. chemo; p = 0.023). Both sex and type of systemic treatment correlated to survival time on univariate analysis. Chemotherapy alone for systemic treatment [p = 0.034; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44 (0.20–0.94)] remained significant for predicting overall survival in the multivariate analysis. ConclusionEven in patients with poor PS and BM at the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, the ICI group had a survival time comparable to that of the TKI group when combined with tailor-made intracranial treatment. There is a subgroup in the patient population that was previously considered unsuitable for ICI, whose PS improves with individualized intracranial treatment, and who may benefit from immunotherapy.

Genomic landscape of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals multiple targetable opportunities.

Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPT) are rare fibroepithelial breast cancers with no known effective systemic therapy; metastatic progression portends a dismal prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape of MPTs through genomic profiling and immunotherapeutic biomarker analysis. Cases of sequenced MPT were identified from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified, College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory (Foundation Medicine). All cases underwent genomic profiling using adaptor ligation-based, next-generation sequencing assay of 324 genes. Tumor agnostic immunotherapy biomarkers, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated. Fisher's Exact Tests and analysis of variance were used to test for differences between groups and for continuous variables as appropriate. Of 135 MPT cases identified; 94 (69.6%) were localized/locally recurrent and 41 (30.4%) were metastatic. Median age was 54 years (range 14-86). The median TMB was 2.5 mut/Mb and 3 were TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb). 21.4% were PD-L1+ via Dako 22C3 assay (CPS ≥1). Most commonly altered genes included TERT-promoter (69.7%), CDKN2A (45.9%), TP53 (37.8%), NF1 (35.6%), CDKN2B (33.3%), MED12 (28.9%), MTAP (27.7%), KMT2D (22.2%), PIK3CA (20.0%), PTEN (18.5%), and RB1 (18.5%). Several tumors harboring genomic alterations with US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in other tumor types were found including NF1, PIK3CA, EGFR Exon 19/20 insertions, and BRAF V600E mutations. In the largest genomic evaluation of MPT to date, multiple clinically actionable mutations were found. Routine sequencing of metastatic MPT may provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: How to Select the Most Suitable?

Rectal cancer shows specific characteristics in terms of pattern of recurrence, which occurs commonly at both local and distant sites. The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by surgery based on the total mesorectal excision principles leads to a reduction in the rates of local recurrences to 6-7% at 5 years. However, the outcomes among those with high-risk lesions remain unsatisfactory. On the contrary, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy results in long-term morbidities among those with low-risk lesions. Furthermore, the overall survival benefit of neoadjuvant therapy is still a subject to be debated, except for patients with complete or near-complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a new paradigm of management of high-risk rectal cancer that includes early administration of the most effective systemic therapy either before or after neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy prior to surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. TNT potentially improves disease-free survival, even though whether it can prolong survival has been debatable. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy only has been proved to be non-inferior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with low-risk lesions. This review intends to review the current evidences of neoadjuvant therapy and propose a more customized paradigm of management of LARC.

Local Therapy in Stage IV Lung Cancer with Oligopersistent or Oligoprogessive Disease

Oligopersistent and oligoprogressive disease are defined as distinct situations of metastastatic lung cancer. Oligopersistence describes a situation in which a limited number of metastases remain following effective systemic therapy. Oligoprogression represents a largely controlled tumour disease with a few metastases showing significant progression. In the oligopersistence, treatment aims to establish complete tumour control with subsequent improvement of the prognosis by means of additional local ablative treatment of all remaining lesions. In the oligoprogressive situation, local ablative treatment aims to reestablish complete tumour control while continuing systemic therapy. The concepts are based on ideas that were introduced in oncology more than 30 years ago by Hellman and Weichselbaum by using the term oligometastases. Multimodal therapy concepts have gained importance in the situation of oligopersistence and oligoprogression, particularly due to molecular targeted therapies for oncogene-driven lung cancer and chemo-immunotherapy regimes with high response rates and long response duration. The available evidence will be presented and explained by case studies.

ZNF300 promotes proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating c-MYC gene expression

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the liver. Currently, the treatments of HCC are limited to surgical resection and liver transplantation, and there is no effective systemic therapy. ObjectivesTo investigate the regulatory mechanism of zinc finger protein 300 (ZNF300) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThe expressions of ZNF300 in HCC tissue samples and HCC cell lines (Hep3B, Huh7, SNU-387) were detected. ZNF300 overexpression vector (ZNF300) or shRNAZNF300 (shZNF300) was transfected into HCC cells to increase or inhibit ZNF300 expression. 5‐Ethynyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine assay (EdU), cell counting kit‐8 assay (CCK‐8) and transwell invasion assay were conducted to evaluate the proliferation, viability, migration, and invasion of HCC cells respectively. The expressions of tumor migration and invasion related proteins (matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9), c-MYC, and MAPK/ERK signaling pathway related molecules (p-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, p-P38, P38) were determined by western blotting. Hep3B cells transfected with shZNF300 were subcutaneously injected into nude mice to perform tumor xenograft experiment. Tumor volume and weight were measured. ResultsZNF300 was upregulated in HCC tissues and cells. The expressions of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were increased in HCC cells after transfecting with ZNF300 but reduced in HCC cells transfected with shZNF300. Downregulation of ZNF300 inhibited HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, while overexpression of ZNF300 showed the opposite effects. Moreover, the expressions of c-MYC and MAPK/ERK signaling pathway related molecules were increased after overexpression of ZNF300 but reduced after downregulating ZNF300. In tumor xenograft experiment, downregulation of ZNF300 reduced tumor volume and weight. ConclusionThe present study proved that downregulation of ZNF300 inhibited HCC growth by reducing c-MYC expression and MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.

A multi-centre, single arm, phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab in treatment-naïve patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site.

2659 Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a heterogeneous group of cancers that present with metastatic epithelial disease with no identifiable primary lesion at the time of diagnosis. Patients with poor prognostic features have limited effective systemic therapy options. Researchers hypothesize that these primary lesions are occult, in part, due to anti-cancer immune surveillance. We hypothesize, pembrolizumab will have activity in this setting. Methods: This single arm phase 2 study evaluated the use of pembrolizumab in treatment naïve patients with poor prognosis CUP. Patients ≥18 years of age with ECOG PS 0-1 and histologically proven, measurable metastatic carcinoma with no primary site identified were eligible. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg intravenously every 3-weeks for up to 24 months. The primary endpoint was safety and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study used a Simon’s two stage design based on a one-sided test with a type 1 error rate of 0.1, null hypothesis for ORR ≤ 20% yielding a power of 0.8 with an alternate hypothesis of ≥40%. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 8 or more responses are observed in 25 patients. Mismatch repair (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was not mandatory for patients. Results: There were 27 evaluable and 6 unevaluable (no response assessment, included in adverse event analysis) patients. The median age was 64 (range 21-80) and the majority were male (57.6%) and ECOG 1 (84.8%). Four patients experienced grade 3 treatment related adverse events (pain, anorexia, fatigue, confusion, and anemia). There were no treatment related deaths or new signals of toxicity. Of the evaluable patients, the ORR was 18.5% (4 partial responses and 1 complete response), disease control rate was 51.9% (9 stable disease) and thus the null hypothesis could not be rejected. For evaluable patients, the median PFS and OS were 2.56 (95% CI 2.10 – 7.46) and 9.79 (95% CI 3.84 – 16.03) months respectively. The one patient who developed a CR had MMR deficiency and has completed 2 years of therapy. Of the 4 patients with a partial response, one had an MMR proficient tumour, while the remaining 3 had unknown MMR status. Conclusions: Although not meeting the primary endpoint, pembrolizumab has some activity in CUP patients. Patients with CUP should be screened for MMR or MSI. Future studies should evaluate combination therapies with the addition of pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT03391973 .

A phase III randomized trial of radiotherapy optimization for low-risk HER2-positive breast cancer (HERO): NRG-BR008.

TPS613 Background: Breast radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, the magnitude of benefit of RT is less clear in BCS patients with low-risk disease who receive effective systemic therapy. Among patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, 10-year locoregional recurrence has been reported as low as 1.5% following BCS, adjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, and RT. Given these exceedingly favorable outcomes, with the addition of HER2-directed therapy, we seek to evaluate the feasibility of omitting RT among patients with early-stage HER2+ BC following BCS and appropriate systemic therapy. Methods: This is a phase III randomized trial for patients ≥40 years with early-stage, node-negative, HER2+ (IHC/FISH) BC treated with BCS with negative margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection. Patients undergoing primary surgery must have pathologic T1 (≤2 cm) N0 disease, while patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy must have clinical T1-2 (with radiographically T≤3.0 cm) N0 disease and exhibit a pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) at surgery. All patients must receive cytotoxic chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, either in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Stratification is by age (<60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1 cm), estrogen-receptor status (positive; negative), and systemic therapy sequencing (adjuvant vneoadjuvant). Patients will be randomized to standard breast RT in addition to continuation of trastuzumab to complete one year of treatment (Arm 1), or trastuzumab alone (Arm 2). Endocrine therapy will be recommended for patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors. The primary endpoint is the recurrence-free interval (RFI). Secondary endpoints include time to ipsilateral breast recurrence, locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival, in addition to the 7-year ipsilateral breast recurrence rate among those not receiving RT. A health-related quality of life sub-study will assess differences in patient-reported breast pain and worry. We estimate a 7-year RFI of 97.5% with RT and allow for a clinically acceptable decrement of 3.63% without RT (7-year RFI of 93.87%; HR 2.5) to establish omission of RT as non-inferior. NRG-BR008 aims to enroll 1,300 patients over 4.5 years, yielding 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of RT omission with a one-sided α=0.05. We expect to observe the required 38 RFI events within 6 years of additional follow-up. The NRG-BR008/HERO trial opened to accrual in March 2023. Accrual is 13/1,300 as of 02-05-2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05705401 .

Anti-PD-L1 antibody TQB2450 combined with tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor AL2846 for immunotherapy-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective phase 1b cohort study.

Effective systemic therapy remains limited for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly after prior failed treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Theoretically, a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with ICIs may restore immunotherapy sensitivity. In this phase 1b study, patients received AL2846, an antiangiogenic TKI with multiple targets (c-MET, VEGFR1, c-KIT, Axl, RET, KDR, and VEGFR3), in combination with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (TQB2450) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, death, or discontinuation for any cause. The primary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary end points encompassing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response. Between November 2021 and September 2022, 18 patients with ESCC and 15 patients with HCC, whose ORR was 11.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-32.8%) and 0%, respectively, were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) of any grade and treatment-related AEs were documented in 32 patients (97.0%) and 31 patients (93.9%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher AEs were observed in 10 patients (30.3%), with vomiting (6.1%) and infectious pneumonia (9.1%) being the most prevalent. Median PFS and OS values were 3.22 months (95% CI, 1.35-5.68 months) and 5.98 months (95% CI, 3.71-8.87 months), respectively, in patients with ESCC, and 5.55 months (95% CI, 2.66 months to not evaluable [NE]) and 16.72 months (95% CI, 4.86 months to NE), respectively, in patients with HCC. The DCRs were 66.7% (95% CI, 43.75%-83.72%) in patients with ESCC and 73.3% (95% CI, 48.05%-89.10%) in patients with HCC. Combined TQB2450 and AL2846 therapy exhibited a favorable safety profile in immunotherapy-refractory patients with advanced ESCC and HCC.

Abstract PO5-23-05: The Impact of Bi-Annual Diagnostic Imaging on Detecting Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) represents the preferred option for surgical treatment for a majority of patients with early-stage breast cancer who are eligible for this approach. When compared with mastectomy approaches, BCS provides patients with equivalent survival while preserving the affected breast. It is necessary to achieve clear surgical margins as positive lumpectomy margins are associated with an increased risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. With advances in imaging techniques, as well as effective systemic therapy and contemporary radiation therapy, local recurrence after BCS has decreased and overall survival for patients has improved. Retrospective studies have quantified the recurrence rate in unifocal breast cancer as 8 - 15% at 20 years. The NCCN recommends annual mammography at least 6 months after post-lumpectomy radiation therapy, but there is little data regarding more frequent surveillance after lumpectomy in the early post-operative setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of short interval surveillance mammography on the detection of early in-breast recurrence in patients undergoing BCS. Methods: Our IRB-approved Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients enrolled from 11/2009 to 6/2023 who underwent breast conservation surgery for a diagnosis of in situ or invasive breast cancer in this retrospective analysis. Per our institutional protocol, patients were recommended to undergo diagnostic mammography of the treated breast(s) every 6 months for 2 years after BCS. After the initial 2 year period, bilateral mammography was performed annually in the absence of other indications. Additional supplemental imaging such as breast ultrasound and MRI were performed at physician discretion and based on patient risk and breast density. Variables of interest included the presence of pathogenic germline mutations, family history of breast cancer, and disease characteristics. Our primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results: Of 2491 patients who underwent breast conservation surgery for in situ or invasive breast cancer, 191 (7.7%) developed recurrent disease, including ipsilateral and contralateral recurrence, and distant disease, in the study period. A total of 83 (3.2%) patients developed ipsilateral breast recurrence during the entire study period. Of those, 19 (22.9%) were detected within the first two years after surgery. Six of the 19 patients (31.6%) had their recurrences detected on yearly diagnostic mammography while 6 (31.6%) patients had their recurrences detected on interval 6-month unilateral diagnostic imaging. In both groups, 5/6 recurrences were invasive disease after an original diagnosis of invasive cancer, and the remaining patient had recurrent DCIS. The remaining 7/19 patients (36.8%) had their ipsilateral recurrences detected on palpation or other diagnostic imaging. In this group as well, there was one case of recurrent DCIS, with the remaining 6 cases representing recurrent invasive cancer. Of the 19 patients with ipsilateral recurrences, none had pathogenic germline mutations. 4 of the 19 patients (21%) had positive margins after their initial lumpectomy surgery with re- excisions required to achieve clear margins. Conclusion: Interval diagnostic surveillance imaging every 6 months after breast conserving surgery identified almost one-third of the ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences that occurred within the first 2 years after surgery in our population. While our numbers are small, the relationship of re-excision lumpectomy surgery to subsequent risk for local recurrence has been described by others, and bears further study. Particularly in view of our observation that the majority of in-breast recurrences were invasive, our data supports the practice of more frequent imaging follow up in the first 2 years after breast conserving surgery. Citation Format: Pabel Miah, Laura Fiedler, Anthony Baez, Athanasios Sevdalis, Alyssa Marmer, Charles DiMaggio, Linda Pak, Richard Shapiro, Karen Hiotis, Deborah Axelrod, Amber Guth, Freya Schnabel. The Impact of Bi-Annual Diagnostic Imaging on Detecting Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Breast Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-23-05.

Abstract PO1-19-01: NRG-BR008: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Optimization for Low-risk HER2-positive Breast Cancer (HERO)

Abstract Background: Breast radiotherapy (RT) is the standard of care for patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, the magnitude of benefit of RT is less clear in BCS patients with low-risk disease who receive effective systemic therapy. Among patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) BC, 10-year locoregional recurrence has been reported as low as 1.5% following BCS, adjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, and RT. Given these exceedingly favorable outcomes, with the addition of HER2-directed therapy, we seek to evaluate the feasibility of omitting RT among patients with early-stage HER2+ BC following BCS and appropriate systemic therapy. Methods: This is a phase III randomized trial for patients ≥40 years with early-stage, node-negative HER2+ (IHC/FISH) BC treated with BCS with negative margins and sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection. Patients undergoing primary surgery must have pathologic T1 (< 2 cm) N0 disease, while patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy must have clinical T1-2 (with radiographically T< 3.0 cm) N0 disease and exhibit a pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) at surgery. All patients must receive cytotoxic chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, either in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Stratification is by age (< 60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1 cm), estrogen-receptor status (positive; negative), and systemic therapy sequencing (adjuvant vs neoadjuvant). Patients will be randomized to standard breast RT in addition to continuation of trastuzumab to complete a year of treatment (Arm 1), or trastuzumab alone (Arm 2). Endocrine therapy will be recommended for patients with hormone-receptor positive tumors. The primary endpoint is the recurrence-free interval (RFI). Secondary endpoints include the time to ipsilateral breast recurrence, locoregional recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival, in addition to the 7-year ipsilateral breast recurrence rate among those not receiving RT. A health-related quality of life sub-study will assess differences in patient-reported breast pain and worry. We estimate a 7-year RFI of 97.5% with RT and allow for a clinically acceptable decrement of 3.63% without RT (7-year RFI of 93.87%; HR 2.5) to establish omission of RT as non-inferior. NRG-BR008 aims to enroll 1,300 patients over 4.5 years, yielding 80% power to detect the non-inferiority of RT omission with a one-sided α=0.05. We expect to observe the required 38 RFI events within 6 years of additional follow-up. The NRG-BR008/HERO trial opened to accrual in March, 2023. NCT05705401. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Susan G. Komen Foundation (JR) Citation Format: Lior Braunstein, Melissa Mitchell, Hanna Bandos, William Sikov, Atif Khan, Peter Chen, Patricia Ganz, Reshma Jagsi, Julia White, Reena Cecchini, Hyejoo Kang, Shannon Puhalla, Kelly Bolton, Eileen Connolly, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Kimberly Gergelis, Thomas Julian, Eleftherios Mamounas, Norman Wolmark. NRG-BR008: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Optimization for Low-risk HER2-positive Breast Cancer (HERO) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-01.

The efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitor combined with TACE in the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a first-line treatment for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma. Serving as a local treatment modality that can induce immunogenic cell death, the efficacy and safety of combined use with ICI have not been evaluated. Although there have been prospective studies aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of ICI combined with TACE in BCLC stage B HCC patients, there are few reports on the evaluation of BCLC stage C patients with distant metastasis or portal vein cancer thrombus. Data of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients received PD-1 inhibitor and TACE were collected in Xijing Hospital from June 2019 to December 2022. The tumor response was evaluated according to the Solid Tumor Modified Response Evaluation Standard (mRECIST), including complete response (CR), partial response (PR), disease stability (SD), disease progression (PD), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to estimate therapy efficacy. The treatment-related adverse events were evaluated based on National Cancer Institute Common Adverse Event Evaluation Criteria (CTCAE) version 5.0. A total of 42 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study, including 34 males (80.5%) and 8 females (19.5%). The average age is 54.5years, ranging from 34 to 72. The median follow-up time was 12.3months, with an ORR of 42.9% and a DCR of 90.5% as of the follow-up time. The median PFS is 7.5months (95% CI: 5.76-9.23), and the median OS has not yet been reached; 6-month PFS was 62.2%. Safety analysis showed that 41 (97.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse reactions, mainly including elevated AST and ALT, fever, elevated bilirubin, hypothyroidism, nausea, abdominal pain, and rash. 40 patients had grade 1/2 adverse reactions, and only one patient had grade 3 adverse reactions, manifested as intolerable rash, nausea, and vomiting. Treatment is terminated when symptomatic treatment and drug suspension cannot be alleviated. In this study, thre patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma were treated with PD-1 inhibitor combined with TACE to achieve good tumor reduction effect and underwent liver cancer resection surgery. For patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, whether in BCLC stage B or stage C, effective systemic therapy (PD-1 inhibitor) combined with local therapy (TACE) can achieve a high rate of tumor regression and objective response. Some patients may even pursue surgical treatment opportunities, and the treatment-related adverse reactions are controllable, which is expected to provide new options for extending the survival of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Abstract 5901: A targetable secreted protein drives pancreatic cancer metastatic colonization and HIF1a nuclear retention

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an increasingly diagnosed cancer that kills 90% of afflicted patients. Thus, effective systemic therapy to PDAC remains a significant unmet medical need. NPTX1 is over-expressed in in vivoselected highly metastatic pancreatic cancer cells and promotes liver metastasis: Ex vivo mRNAseq of highly metastatic human and murine PDAC liver metastatic tumors identified neuronal pentraxin 1 (NPTX1) as a cancer secreted protein that becomes over-expressed during PDAC metastatic progression. CRISPRi-based silencing of NPTX1 reduced liver metastatic tumor burden by 15-fold in the highly metastatic clones. NPTX1 is over-expressed in PDAC liver metastases and predicts survival of PDAC patients: To assess NPTX1 protein expression in situ, two independent board-certified pathologists developed an immunohistochemical (IHC) scoring system and blindly scored NPTX1 expression in a large cohort of 125 primary and 47 liver metastatic PDAC tumors obtained through the rapid-autopsy program at MSKCC. Liver metastatic samples exhibited significantly higher IHC scores than primary PDAC samples (>2-fold increase). NPTX1 upregulation promotes cell growth under hypoxia: NPTX1 depletion suppressed growth of PDAC cells under hypoxia but not normoxia. Extracellular supplementation of recombinant NPTX1 was sufficient to rescue cell growth of NPTX1 depleted cells supporting the critical role of secreted NPTX1 in promoting cell growth under hypoxia. AMIGO2 is a cell surface NPTX1 receptor and mediates HIF1a nuclear retention via specific HIF1a residues: We next sought to identify the cell surface receptor for NPTX1. We reasoned that a receptor for NPTX1 may become upregulated as a feedback response to depletion of its ligand. mRNA sequencing of ex vivo NPTX1-depleted tumors identified AMIGO2. AMIGO2 promoted nuclear retention of HIF1a and conversely, its depletion drove the degradation of HIF1a. HIF1a/hypoxia reporter assay revealed that AMIGO2 depletion led to 300-fold reduction of HIF1a activity. Overexpression of a phosphomimetic construct at HIF1a serine 641 and 643, not a full length HIF1a ORF rescued AMIGO2 mediated HIF1a reporter signal reduction. Therapeutic targeting of NPTX1-AMIGO2 axis in primary and metastatic PDAC: Through phage display and mouse immunization campaigns, we identified 6 human IgG1 and 1 murine IgG1 antibodies that exhibited high affinity binding to human NPTX1. We identified anti- NPTX1 murine IgG1 antibody 31B01(31B01) as a lead antibody that substantially and significantly suppressed liver metastatic colonization by >80% outperforming gemcitabine. We also tested the impact of 31B01 on the pancreas orthotopic tumor growth. 31B01 suppressed orthotopic patient derived organoid (PDO) growth (>70% reduction), caused a regression response and dramatically extended the overall survival of treated mice harboring PDAC PDO. Citation Format: Norihiro Yamaguchi, Gloria Wu, Ethan Ravetch, Mai Takahashi, Abdul G. Khan, Akimasa Hayashi, Wenbin Mei, Dennis Hsu, Elisa de Stanchina, Ivo C. Lorenz, Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue, Sohail F. Tavazoie. A targetable secreted protein drives pancreatic cancer metastatic colonization and HIF1a nuclear retention [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5901.

Abstract 7493: Real-time monitoring of CTC number, biomarker expression, and kinetics as prognostic and predictive markers in patients with GI malignancies

Abstract Background: Most of the utility in the clinic regarding liquid biopsies has been around circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). ctDNA analysis provides valuable insight into mutational burden and therapeutic targets, but the speed and cost of analysis are prohibitive especially when it comes to serial testing. Using a cohort of patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, we herein show the feasibility of using circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration, biomarker analysis, and kinetics as complementary to or as an alternative to ctDNA testing. Methods: Using the RareCyte platform, nucleated cells from blood were collected, spread on slides, stained, and imaged with CyteFinder® for CTC identification (CK/EpCAM+, CD45-) and quantification of biomarkers (PD-L1/HER2 or Ki67/EGFR). CTC enumeration (CLIA-accredited CTC test) and biomarker status for each patient were tracked over time and compared with ctDNA mutational analysis and tumor burden. Results: CTCs were detected in 60/70 samples (86%) and in 36/38 unique patients (95%). On average, more CTCs were detected in baseline samples from colorectal cancer patients compared to other subtypes (Table 1). Moreover, multiple patients showed pronounced changes in CTC number that correlated with treatment response, as well as strong correlation between CTC and tissue biomarker expression e.g. HER2. Rapid decline and/or CTC clearance was seen as early as a few days into starting effective systemic therapy. The average turnaround time for CTC testing was 5-7 days. Table 1. CTC values in initial baseline blood draw sample Gastrointestinal cancer subtype # of patients Average # of CTCs per 7.5mL blood Median # of CTCs per 7.5mL blood Minimum # of CTCs per 7.5mL blood Maximum # of CTCs per 7.5mL blood Colorectal carcinoma 27 84 3 0 1378 Cholangiocarcinoma 3 8 3 1 23 Pancreatic cancer 3 2 2 0 3 Hepatocellular carcinoma 2 4 5 0 10 Gallbladder cancer 1 6 6 3 8 Appendix cancer 1 2 2 1 3 Anal cancer 1 0 0 0 0 Conclusions: Our study emphasizes that real-time monitoring of CTCs is complementary to traditional tumor burden monitoring via imaging and ctDNA analysis. CTCs offer multiple unique advantages vs ctDNA including early response assessment within days of initiating therapy, a substantial decrease in cost of serial testing, and the ability to assess clinically relevant cell surface protein biomarkers e.g. HER2 and PD-L1. Citation Format: Erin G. Bayer, Brock M. Bartels, Rachel N. Ponting, Areeb Lutfi, Maaz K. Afghan, Arturo B. Ramirez, Pashtoon M. Kasi. Real-time monitoring of CTC number, biomarker expression, and kinetics as prognostic and predictive markers in patients with GI malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7493.

ACTION: a randomized phase 3 study of ONC201 (dordaviprone) in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma.

H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma primarily affects children and young adults, is associated with a poor prognosis, and no effective systemic therapy is currently available. ONC201 (dordaviprone) has previously demonstrated efficacy in patients with recurrent disease. This phase 3 trial evaluates ONC201 in patients with newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant glioma. ACTION (NCT05580562) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international phase 3 study of ONC201 in newly diagnosed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma. Patients who have completed standard frontline radiotherapy are randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, once-weekly dordaviprone, or twice-weekly dordaviprone on 2 consecutive days. Primary efficacy endpoints are overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); PFS is assessed by response assessment in neuro-oncology high-grade glioma criteria (RANO-HGG) by blind independent central review. Secondary objectives include safety, additional efficacy endpoints, clinical benefit, and quality of life. Eligible patients have histologically confirmed H3 K27M-mutant diffuse glioma, a Karnofsky/Lansky performance status ≥70, and completed first-line radiotherapy. Eligibility is not restricted by age; however, patients must be ≥10 kg at time of randomization. Patients with a primary spinal tumor, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, leptomeningeal disease, or cerebrospinal fluid dissemination are not eligible. ACTION is currently enrolling in multiple international sites.

Lenvatinib in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

TPS578 Background: Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) however; up to 20% of patients develop recurrent disease. HCC recurrence post-transplant is usually extrahepatic (up to 67%) hence requires effective systemic therapy options. Available data are limited and restricted to small non-randomized studies and case series. Lack of prospective clinical trial data and limited data indicates an area of unmet need in treatment of recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. This phase II study aims evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. Methods: This is a multi-institutional phase II trial with lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after transplantation. Lenvatinib is administered 12 mg daily orally in patients ≥60 kg, and 8 mg daily orally in patients <60 kg. Each cycle is 28 days. Restaging scans will be performed every 8 weeks. Eligible patients must have histologically proven HCC that has recurred after liver transplantation and not amenable for surgical resection, age ≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1, adequate organ function, no prior systemic therapy with lenvatinib or another systemic therapy in the post-transplant setting. Prior liver directed therapy is allowed, should be at least >28 days prior to the study enrollment, and should have at least one measurable untreated lesion by RECIST 1.1 Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are safety/tolerability, progression free survival, and overall survival. Pre-treatment and on-treatment peripheral blood samples will be collected for correlative research. A Simon`s two stage Minimax design is employed (H0: ORR = 5%; H1: ORR = 24%; Type I error = 0.05; power = 80%). In the first stage, 11 patients will be accrued, and if there is no objective response among them, the study will be stopped for futility. Otherwise, additional 6 patients will be accrued for a total of 17 patients. This study is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05103904 .

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab in combination with TACE for patients with BCLC B HCC.

TPS584 Background: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (AB) is an effective regimen for patients with advanced HCC1. Moving effective systemic therapy to earlier stages of HCC is a priority in improving outcomes. Assessing the safety of the combination of AB and TACE is essential to evaluating this regimen. Methods: This is an open-label, single arm pilot study. The primary objective of this study is to examine the safety and tolerability of AB with TACE. The secondary objectives are response rate, time to progression, overall survival, time to TACE progression (TTTP), and time to untaceable progression. Approximately 24 patients will be enrolled. AB will be given every 3 weeks (A: 1200 mg; 15 mg/kg) weeks and TACE will be planned for each patient to be completed in up to 4 treatments. B will be held for cycles that are within 4 weeks before or after each TACE. Imaging will be every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks for the second year. Based on data from the GO30140 and the IMbrave 150 studies, we assume the rate of grade 3 or higher AEs is approximately 55% for AB and will likely be higher with the addition of TACE. Safety will be continuously monitored using the Bayesian Predictive Probability (PP) approach2. The PP that the rate of grade 3 or higher AEs is related to the combination is greater than 70% by the end of the trial based on toxicity data in the current stage will be continuously updated. Inclusion criteria includes patients over 18 years old with an ECOG PS of 0 or 1, no cirrhosis or Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, diagnosis of HCC by imaging or biopsy, and EGD within 6 months with no evidence of gastroesophageal varices with bleeding or high risk of bleeding unless treated. Patients are excluded if they are candidates for curative intent therapy, have had hepatic encephalopathy in the last 12 months, have occlusion of the hepatic artery or main portal vein, or have history of significant autoimmune disease. 1. Finn, Richard S., et al. New England Journal of Medicine 382.20 (2020): 1894-1905. 2 Lee J and Liu D. Clinical Trials. 2008; 5(2): 93-106. Clinical trial information: NCT05776875 .

Brain Radiotherapy With Pyrotinib and Capecitabine in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases

The potential benefit of combining intracranial effective systemic therapy with radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer with brain metastases remains unclear. To assess the activity and safety of combining radiotherapy with pyrotinib and capecitabine in patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. This was a single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial with a safety run-in phase. Between January 2020 and August 2022, patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases were enrolled. The data cutoff date was February 1, 2023. Patients received either fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy or whole-brain radiotherapy. Treatment with pyrotinib (400 mg, once daily) and capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, twice daily, on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle) was initiated from the first day of radiotherapy to the seventh day after the completion of radiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was 1-year central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary end points included CNS objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, and changes in neurocognitive function. A total of 40 female patients (median age, 50.5 years [IQR, 46-59 years]) were enrolled and received treatment, including 3 patients in safety run-in phase. With a median follow-up of 17.3 months (IQR, 10.3-26.9), the 1-year CNS PFS rate was 74.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-90.7%), and the median CNS PFS was 18.0 months (95% CI, 15.5 to not reached). The 1-year PFS rate was 66.9% (95% CI, 53.1%-84.2%), and the median PFS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 12.8-34.1). The CNS objective response rate was 85% (34 of 40). Median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (7.5%). Asymptomatic radiation necrosis was identified in 4 of 67 lesions (6.0%) treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients maintained neurocognitive function, as evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination at different points. The results of this trial suggest that radiotherapy combined with pyrotinib and capecitabine is associated with long intracranial survival benefit in patients with ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer and brain metastases with an acceptable safety profile. This combination deserves further validation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04582968.

SEGMENTECTOMIES FOR LUNG CANCER: THE CONCERN OF DOING LESS

We read with interest the results of the trial “Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer” published in NEJM. The authors should be congratulated for their efforts to organize and manage this large multicenter trial. In fact, in the surgical-oncology field, there are several examples when a study is conducted with the aim to demonstrate a "maintained oncological efficacy" using a "less destructive intervention". We believe that the dream of all thoracic surgeons is to be able to go down the same road that breast surgeons took when they abandoned mastectomy in favor of quadrantectomy. We fear that the time is yet to come, and who knows when it will ever be due to epidemiologic variability of lung cancer or the introduction of new and more effective systemic therapy.