Effects Of Positive End-expiratory Pressure Research Articles

High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials.

The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. Our objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at Intermediate-to-High Risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. We studied the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP Ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio (OR) for High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to Low PEEP was 0.85 (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (OR: 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for PPCs (OR: 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of PPC occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.

Effect of lung volume preservation during spontaneous breathing trial on successful extubation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: protocol for a multicenter clinical trial

BackgroundIn standard weaning from mechanical ventilation, a successful spontaneous breathing test (SBT) consisting of 30 min 8 cmH2O pressure-support ventilation (PSV8) without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is followed by extubation with continuous suctioning; however, these practices might promote derecruitment. Evidence supports the feasibility and safety of extubation without suctioning. Ultrasound can assess lung aeration and respiratory muscles. We hypothesize that weaning aiming to preserve lung volume can yield higher rates of successful extubation.MethodsThis multicenter superiority trial will randomly assign eligible patients to receive either standard weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 without PEEP followed by extubation with continuous suctioning] or lung-volume-preservation weaning [SBT: 30-min PSV8 + 5 cmH2O PEEP followed by extubation with positive pressure without suctioning]. We will compare the rates of successful extubation and reintubation, ICU and hospital stays, and ultrasound measurements of the volume of aerated lung (modified lung ultrasound score), diaphragm and intercostal muscle thickness, and thickening fraction before and after successful or failed SBT. Patients will be followed for 90 days after randomization.DiscussionWe aim to recruit a large sample of representative patients (N = 1600). Our study cannot elucidate the specific effects of PEEP during SBT and of positive pressure during extubation; the results will show the joint effects derived from the synergy of these two factors. Although universal ultrasound monitoring of lungs, diaphragm, and intercostal muscles throughout weaning is unfeasible, if derecruitment is a major cause of weaning failure, ultrasound may help clinicians decide about extubation in high-risk and borderline patients.Trial registrationThe Research Ethics Committee (CEIm) of the Fundació Unió Catalana d’Hospitals approved the study (CEI 22/67 and 23/26). Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in August 2023. Identifier: NCT05526053.

The impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on right ventricular function in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS: a prospective paired-design study.

To determine the effects of varying positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs) on right ventricular function, hemodynamics, oxygenation, and the incidence of acute cor pulmonale (ACP) in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This prospective paired-design study involved patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS in the ICU. Participants received lung-protective ventilation and hemodynamic monitoring. During the study, mechanical ventilation was administered with PEEPs of 5 cmH2O, 10 cmH2O, and 15 cmH2O, while maintaining an end-inspiratory plateau pressure ≤ 30 cmH2O. Various assessments, including transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac output measurement, and blood gas analysis, were conducted at baseline and after 1 h of ventilation at each PEEP. Subsequently, variations in ventilation oxygenation, echocardiographic parameters, and hemodynamic indicators under different PEEPs were analyzed to explore the potential effects of PEEP on right ventricular function and hemodynamics, as well as the incidence of ACP. A total of 317 ARDS patients were screened. Among them, 104 met the diagnostic criteria for moderate-to-severe ARDS, and 52 completed the study. The baseline PEEP of these 52 participants, acquired before commencement, was 11.5 ± 1.7 cmH2O, and the incidence of ACP was 25.0% (13/52). Intensive care unit mortality, overall hospital mortality, and 28-day mortality rates were 19.2% (10/52), 21.2% (11/52), and 32.7% (17/52), respectively. During the study, ACP incidences at PEEPs of 5 cmH2O, 10 cmH2O, and 15 cmH2O were 17.3% (9/52), 21.2% (11/52), and 38.5% (20/52), respectively. Meanwhile, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved with increasing PEEP, reaching 162.0 (140.9, 174.0), 171.0 (144.0, 182.0), and 176.5 (151.0, 196) mmHg at PEEPs of 5 cmH2O, 10 cmH2O, and 15 cmH2O, respectively. In addition, higher PEEPs were associated with a slight increase in PaCO2, showing statistically significant differences compared to moderate and low PEEPs. Compared to a PEEP of 5 cmH2O or 10 cmH2O, right ventricular function exhibited substantial changes at 15 cmH2O PEEP, manifested as increased pulmonary artery systolic pressure, enlarged right ventricular end-diastolic area, and decreased tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, all with significant differences. Conversely, variations in left ventricular end-diastolic area and ejection fraction were not statistically significant. In terms of hemodynamics, increasing PEEP resulted in a decline in cardiac index (CI), with statistically significant differences between different PEEPs. Specifically, compared to the value at a PEEP of 5 cmH2O, the CI at a PEEP of 15 cmH2O decreased by 14.3% (2.63 [2.20, 2.95] vs. 3.07 [2.69, 3.67], p < 0.001). The decline in the stroke volume index with PEEP was more obvious (22.1 [18.4, 27.1] vs. 27.0 [24.2, 33.0], p < 0.001), reaching 18.1%. Additionally, both end-diastolic volume index and extravascular lung water index decreased significantly with increasing PEEP, while the pulmonary vascular permeability index remained unaffected. Different PEEPs can affect the incidence of ACP in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. High PEEP improves oxygenation and reduces extravascular lung water without significantly affecting the pulmonary vascular permeability index and left ventricular systolic function. Nevertheless, it can cause right ventricular dilation, as well as substantial declines in right ventricular systolic function and CI, thereby causing ACP.

PEEP trial and effect on hemodynamic in cardiogenic shock

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Congestion is a paramount pathophysiological driver in patients with cardiogenic shock. Almost half of patients admitted due to cardiogenic shock undertake mechanical ventilation although ventilatory parameter, and their potential hemodynamic effect on the hemodynamic and congestion profile are often neglected. Purpose We sought to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on patients admitted to intensive care unit for CS. Methods We perform PEEP titration trial on patients undertaking mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure related to CS. The trial consisted in 3 steps of PEEP increase from 5 to 15 cmH2O. For each step arterial saturation, right atrial -RAP- and systemic blood pressure along with heart rate and respiratory mechanics (tidal volume-TV-, dynamic lung compliance- CLdyn, driving- Δ- and plateau pressure- Ppl) were measured. All the measures were taken at end-expiration; RAP trace was analyzed and systolic, mean and diastolic component collected. The final PEEP was decided based on the best matching between saturation, CLdyn and TV. Descriptive and repeated measures with Bonferroni correction were applied as statistical analysis (IBM SPSS 29). Results Twelve patients were included (10 male, 66 ± 7 years old; 8 acute myocardial infarction and 4 acute heart failure). At baseline the mean RAP was 8.44 (± 2.32) ; SBP 106 (IQR 92-112), HR 94 (IQR 88 - 102) Δ and Ppl pressures respectively 7.42 (± 0.79) and 12.08 (± 0.79, ),VT 427(± 65.42) and CLdyn 58.3 (± 7.1). The right atrial pressure (RAP) differed between AMI and AHDF (8.25 ± 2.25 vs 20.25 ± 1.5; p &amp;lt; 0.001), so HR did (113 ± 3.4 versus 96 ± 3.2 betas per minutes; p 0.015). RAP varied consistently during the PEEP trial (either sRAP, dRAP and mRAP- Table and Figure 1). The TV changed signficnatly between the 1st and 3rd step (p 0.004) and the CLdyn varied consistently throughout the 3 steps of the PEEP trial (p &amp;lt;0.001). A significant difference were observed according to aetiology in RAP (AMI Vs ADHF, eman difference 2.4 versus 4.3 mmHg) and in CLdyn (AMI Vs ADHF mean difference 12.31 vs 8 .65, p &amp;lt; 0.01) but not in the other parameters evaluated (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Conclusion This is the first, small, study evaluating the effect of positive pressure ventilation in CS patients according to etiologies. As previously demonstrated PEEP influences the right side hemodynamic by increasing the RAP, although resulting in better CLdyn. The extent of the effect of PEEP increased may be dependent on the underlying aetiology of CS. Considering that the sample size is extremely limited, these results advocate a wider validation. However, the positive pressures induced by the ventilation in patient with CS should be taken in consideration when the comprehensive evaluation of hemodynamic to define congestion profile and phenotype are performed.Table 1.Hemodynamic parametersGraph PEEP vs RAP

Differential Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategies in Patients With ARDS: A Bayesian Analysis of Clinical Subphenotypes

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous condition with two subphenotypes identified by different methodologies. Our group similarly identified two ARDS subphenotypes using nine routinely available clinical variables. However, whether these are associated with differential response to treatment has yet to be explored. Are there differential responses to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategies on 28-day mortality according to subphenotypes in adult patients with ARDS? We evaluated data from two prior ARDS trials (ALVEOLI and ART) that compared different PEEP strategies. We classified patients into one of two subphenotypes as previously described. We assessed the differential effect of PEEP with a Bayesian hierarchical logistic model for the primary outcome of 28-day mortality. We analyzed data from 1559 ARDS patients. Compared to lower PEEP, a higher PEEP strategy resulted in higher 28-day mortality in subphenotype A patients in ALVEOLI (OR, 1.61 [95% CrI 0.90 to 2.94]) and ART (OR 1.73 [ 95% CrI 1.01 to 2.98]), with a probability of harm from higher PEEP in this subphenotype of 94.3% and 97.7% in ALVEOLI and ART, respectively. Higher PEEP was not associated with mortality in subphenotype B patients in each trial (OR, 0.95 [95% CrI, 0.51 to 1.73]) and (OR, 1.00 [95% CrI 0.63 to 1.55]); probability of benefit of 56.4% and 50.7% in ALVEOLI and ART, respectively. These effects were not modified by PaO2/FiO2 ratio, driving pressure, or the severity of illness for the cohorts. We found evidence of differential response to PEEP strategies across two ARDS subphenotypes, suggesting possible harm with a higher PEEP strategy in one subphenotype. These observations may assist with predictive enrichment in future clinical trials.

Positive end-expiratory pressure limits inspiratory effort through modulation of the effort-to-drive ratio: an experimental crossover study

BackgroundHow assisted spontaneous breathing should be used during acute respiratory distress syndrome is questioned. Recent evidence suggests that high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may limit the risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEEP on esophageal pressure swings, inspiratory drive, and the neuromuscular efficiency of ventilation. We hypothesized that high PEEP would reduce esophageal pressure swings, regardless of inspiratory drive changes, by modulating the effort-to-drive ratio (EDR). This was tested retrospectively in an experimental animal crossover study. Anesthetized pigs (n = 15) were subjected to mild to moderate lung injury and different PEEP levels were applied, changing PEEP from 0 to 15 cmH2O and back to 0 cmH2O in steps of 3 cmH2O. Airway pressure, esophageal pressure (Pes), and electric activity of the diaphragm (Edi) were collected. The EDR was calculated as the tidal change in Pes divided by the tidal change in Edi. Statistical differences were tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsInspiratory esophageal pressure swings decreased from − 4.2 ± 3.1 cmH2O to − 1.9 ± 1.5 cmH2O (p < 0.01), and the mean EDR fell from − 1.12 ± 1.05 cmH2O/µV to − 0.24 ± 0.20 (p < 0.01) as PEEP was increased from 0 to 15 cmH2O. The EDR was significantly correlated to the PEEP level (rs = 0.35, p < 0.01).ConclusionsHigher PEEP limits inspiratory effort by modulating the EDR of the respiratory system. These findings indicate that PEEP may be used in titration of the spontaneous impact on ventilation and in P-SILI risk reduction, potentially facilitating safe assisted spontaneous breathing. Similarly, ventilation may be shifted from highly spontaneous to predominantly controlled ventilation using PEEP. These findings need to be confirmed in clinical settings.

Multicentre, parallel, open-label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial on the prognosis of electrical impedance tomography-guided versus low PEEP/FiO2 table-guided PEEP setting: a trial protocol

IntroductionPrevious studies suggested that electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has the potential to guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration via quantifying the alveolar collapse and overdistension. The aim of this trial...

Meta-Analysis of Higher PEEP Strategies' Effects on Mortality Rates and Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with ARDS: A Perspective Review on Patients with Severe COVID-19-Associated ARDS

&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Different strategies of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilation are crucial for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). PEEP acts as a “double-edged sword” for ARDS patients. PEEP could recover pulmonary atelectasis but can induce alveolar hyperinflation.&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This review aimed to evaluate the effect of higher PEEP in patients with severe COVID-19-associated ARDS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method: &lt;/strong&gt;This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to assess the mortality rates, barotrauma events, and inflammatory mediators modulation due to higher PEEP strategies. The pooled effect of the mortality rates and barotrauma events were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence of interval (CI) using random-effects model (REM) or fixed-effects model (FEM).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We identified twelve RCTs comparing higher versus lower PEEP in ARDS patients. There was unsignificant result in overall mortality rates group [RR=0.94,95%CI(85,1.03),p=0.21] but not in mortality after positive response of oxygenation group [RR=0.88,95%CI(0.81,0.95),p=0.002] in higher PEEP group. In terms of patients without positive response of oxygenation, higher PEEP group had significantly higher mortality rates [RR=1.07,95%CI(1.00,1.15),p=0.06]. Higher PEEP significantly reduced the mortality rates in ARDS patients with PaO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;/FiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;&amp;lt;150 mmHg [RR=0.867,95%CI(0.74,1.00),p=0.04] instead of patients with moderate ARDS (PaO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;/FiO&lt;sub&gt;2 &lt;/sub&gt;≥150 mmHg) [RR=1.12, 95%CI(0.85,1.47), p=0.44]. There were no differences in overall barotrauma events [RR=1.03,95%CI(0.78,1.36),p=0.85] between higher and lower PEEP group. The use of higher and lower PEEP also contribute to the modulation of inflammatory mediators including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1RA, and IL-8.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Higher PEEP could reduce the mortality of patients with ARDS who responded to the oxygenation. Higher PEEP does not increase the risk of overall barotrauma events. Higher PEEP can modulate the inflammatory mediators.&lt;/p&gt;

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain oxygenation in acute brain injury: Friend or foe? A scoping review

BackgroundPatients with acute brain injury (ABI) are a peculiar population because ABI does not only affect the brain but also other organs such as the lungs, as theorized in brain–lung crosstalk models. ABI patients often require mechanical ventilation (MV) to avoid the complications of impaired respiratory function that can follow ABI; MV should be settled with meticulousness owing to its effects on the intracranial compartment, especially regarding positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). This scoping review aimed to (1) describe the physiological basis and mechanisms related to the effects of PEEP in ABI; (2) examine how clinical research is conducted on this topic; (3) identify methods for setting PEEP in ABI; and (4) investigate the impact of the application of PEEP in ABI on the outcome. MethodsThe five-stage paradigm devised by Peters et al. and expanded by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al., and the Joanna Briggs Institute was used for methodology. We also adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension criteria. Inclusion criteria: we compiled all scientific data from peer-reviewed journals and studies that discussed the application of PEEP and its impact on intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain oxygenation in adult patients with ABI. Exclusion criteria: studies that only examined a pediatric patient group (those under the age of 18), experiments conducted solely on animals; studies without intracranial pressure and/or cerebral perfusion pressure determinations, and studies with incomplete information. Two authors searched and screened for inclusion in papers published up to July 2023 using the PubMed-indexed online database. Data were presented in narrative and tubular form. ResultsThe initial search yielded 330 references on the application of PEEP in ABI, of which 36 met our inclusion criteria. PEEP has recognized beneficial effects on gas exchange, but it produces hemodynamic changes that should be predicted to avoid undesired consequences on cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure. Moreover, the elastic properties of the lungs influence the transmission of the forces applied by MV over the brain so they should be taken into consideration. Currently, there are no specific tools that can predict the effect of PEEP on the brain, but there is an established need for a comprehensive monitoring approach for these patients, acknowledging the etiology of ABI and the measurable variables to personalize MV. ConclusionPEEP can be safely used in patients with ABI to improve gas exchange keeping in mind its potentially harmful effects, which can be predicted with adequate monitoring supported by bedside non-invasive neuromonitoring tools.

Effect of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure based on electrical impedance tomography guidance on pulmonary ventilation distribution in patients who receive abdominal thermal perfusion chemotherapy.

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has been shown to be useful in guiding individual positive end-expiratory pressure titration for patients with mechanical ventilation. However, the appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level and whether the individualized PEEP needs to be adjusted during long-term surgery (>6 h) were unknown. Meanwhile, the effect of individualized PEEP on the distribution of pulmonary ventilation in patients who receive abdominal thermoperfusion chemotherapy is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to observe the effect of EIT-guided PEEP on the distribution of pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hot intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The secondary aim was to analyze their effect on postoperative pulmonary complications. A total of 48 patients were recruited and randomly divided into two groups, with 24 patients in each group. For the control group (group A), PEEP was set at 5 cm H2O, while in the EIT group (group B), individual PEEP was titrated and adjusted every 2 h with EIT guidance. Ventilation distribution, respiratory/circulation parameters, and PPC incidence were compared between the two groups. The average individualized PEEP was 10.3 ± 1.5 cm H2O, 10.2 ± 1.6 cm H2O, 10.1 ± 1.8 cm H2O, and 9.7 ± 2.1 cm H2O at 5 min, 2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after tracheal intubation during CRS + HIPEC. Individualized PEEP was correlated with ventilation distribution in the regions of interest (ROI) 1 and ROI 3 at 4 h mechanical ventilation and ROI 1 at 6 h mechanical ventilation. The ventilation distribution under individualized PEEP was back-shifted for 6 h but moved to the control group's ventral side under PEEP 5 cm H2O. The respiratory and circulatory function indicators were both acceptable either under individualized PEEP or PEEP 5 cm H2O. The incidence of total PPCs was significantly lower under individualized PEEP (66.7%) than PEEP 5 cm H2O (37.5%) for patients with CRS + HIPEC. The appropriate individualized PEEP was stable at approximately 10 cm H2O during 6 h for patients with CRS + HIPEC, along with better ventilation distribution and a lower total PPC incidence than the fixed PEEP of 5 cm H2O.Clinical trial registration: identifier ChiCTR1900023897.

Lung Ultrasound to Determine the Effect of Lower vs. Higher PEEP on Lung Aeration in Patients without ARDS—A Substudy of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Ventilation with lower positive end–expiratory pressure (PEEP) may cause loss of lung aeration in critically ill invasively ventilated patients. This study investigated whether a systematic lung ultrasound (LUS) scoring system can detect such changes in lung aeration in a study comparing lower versus higher PEEP in invasively ventilated patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: Single center substudy of a national, multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing lower versus higher PEEP ventilation strategy. Fifty–seven patients underwent a systematic 12–region LUS examination within 12 h and between 24 to 48 h after start of invasive ventilation, according to randomization. The primary endpoint was a change in the global LUS aeration score, where a higher value indicates a greater impairment in lung aeration. Results: Thirty–three and twenty–four patients received ventilation with lower PEEP (median PEEP 1 (0–5) cm H2O) or higher PEEP (median PEEP 8 (8–8) cm H2O), respectively. Median global LUS aeration scores within 12 h and between 24 and 48 h were 8 (4 to 14) and 9 (4 to 12) (difference 1 (–2 to 3)) in the lower PEEP group, and 7 (2–11) and 6 (1–12) (difference 0 (–2 to 3)) in the higher PEEP group. Neither differences in changes over time nor differences in absolute scores reached statistical significance. Conclusions: In this substudy of a randomized clinical trial comparing lower PEEP versus higher PEEP in patients without ARDS, LUS was unable to detect changes in lung aeration.

Effectiveness of PEEP and Recruitment Maneuvers in Improving Oxygenation in Laparoscopic Hysterectomies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Rationale: To determine whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment will benefit in improving oxygenation and in reduction of post-operative complications in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgeries in Trendelenburg position. Methods: Seventy-two patients, 36 in each arm, were recruited for single blind randomized controlled trial. Patients in intervention arm received a PEEP of 8 cm H2O and lung recruitment every 45 min and at the end of surgery. Patients in non-intervention arm (group N) received conventional ventilation with no PEEP and recruitment maneuver. Analysis was done on the basis of PaO2, intraoperative hemodynamics, and post-operative complications. Results: Intra-operative pH, pO2, and pCO2 values were 7.41 ± 0.03; 193.8 ± 13.4; and 38.6 ± 2.6 mmHg in group P, and 7.39 ± 0.72; 162.1 ± 5.3; and 38.8 ± 2 mmHg in group N. A significant increase in pO2 level was noted in the PEEP with recruitment group. Post-operative pH, pO2, and pCO2 values in group P were 7.33 ± 0.03; 87.5 ± 4; and 37.2 ± 3.1 mmHg, respectively, in group P and 7.32 ± 0.03, 87.8 ± 2.7; and 38.5 ± 2.6 mmHg in group N. No significant difference in the arterial blood gas (ABG) values was noted in both the groups in the post-operative period. We did not notice any significant hemodynamic variation in the intervention group (group P) checked 1 min, 3 min, and 5 after performing after recruitment maneuver (RM). Conclusion: PEEP with RM can be used to improve oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries in Trendelenburg position. It has no effect in improving post-operative oxygenation.

Effect of different titration methods on right heart function and prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common disease in intensive critical care(ICU), and the use of positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP) during mechanical ventilation can increase the right heart afterload and eventually cause right heart dysfunction. For these factors causing acute cor pulmonale(ACP), especially inappropriate mechanical ventilation settings, it is important to explore the effect of PEEP on right heart function. ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of three titration methods on right heart function and prognosis in patients with ARDS. MethodsObservational, prospective study in which ARDS patients were enrolled into three distinct PEEP-titration strategies groups: guide, transpulmonary pressure-oriented and driving pressure-oriented. Prognostic indicators, right heart systolic and diastolic echocardiographic function indices, ventilatory parameters, blood gas analysis results, and respiratory mechanics Monitoring indices were collated and analyzed statistically by STATA 15 software. ResultsA total of 62 ARDS patients were enrolled into guide (G) group (n=40) for whom titrated PEEP values were 9±2cm H2O, driving pressure-oriented (DPO) group (n=12) with titrated PEEP values of 10±2cm H2O and transpulmonary pressure-oriented (TPO) group (n=10) with titrated PEEP values of 12±3cm H2O. Values were significantly higher for TPO than for G (p=0.616) or DPO (p=0.011). Compliance was significantly increased after 72 h in the TPO and DPO groups compared with the G group (p<0.001). Mean airway pressure at end-inspiratory obstruction (p=0.047), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, p<0.001) and right ventricular area change fraction (RVFAC, p=0.049) were all higher in the TPO and DPO groups than in the G group. E/A indices were significantly better in the TPO group than in the G or DPO groups (p=0.046). No significant differences in 28 day mortality were found among the three groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that lung compliance and transpulmonary pressure-oriented PEEP titration method was negatively correlated to the increase in right ventricular systolic dysfunction. ConclusionTranspulmonary pressure-oriented PEEP titration improves oxygenation and pulmonary function and causes less right heart strain when compared to other PEEP-titration methods during mechanical ventilation of ARDS patients.

Personalized ventilatory strategy based on lung recruitablity in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective clinical study

BackgroundHeterogeneity is an inherent nature of ARDS. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio has been developed to identify the patients who has lung recruitablity. This technique might be useful to identify the patients that match specific interventions, such as higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or prone position or both. We aimed to evaluate the physiological effects of PEEP and body position on lung mechanics and regional lung inflation in COVID-19-associated ARDS and to propose the optimal ventilatory strategy based on recruitment-to-inflation ratio.MethodsPatients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were consecutively enrolled. Lung recruitablity (recruitment-to-inflation ratio) and regional lung inflation (electrical impedance tomography [EIT]) were measured with a combination of body position (supine or prone) and PEEP (low 5 cmH2O or high 15 cmH2O). The utility of recruitment-to-inflation ratio to predict responses to PEEP were examined with EIT.ResultsForty-three patients were included. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio was 0.68 (IQR 0.52–0.84), separating high recruiter versus low recruiter. Oxygenation was the same between two groups. In high recruiter, a combination of high PEEP with prone position achieved the highest oxygenation and less dependent silent spaces in EIT (vs. low PEEP in both positions) without increasing non-dependent silent spaces in EIT. In low recruiter, low PEEP in prone position resulted in better oxygenation (vs. both PEEPs in supine position), less dependent silent spaces (vs. low PEEP in supine position) and less non-dependent silent spaces (vs. high PEEP in both positions). Recruitment-to-inflation ratio was positively correlated with the improvement in oxygenation and respiratory system compliance, the decrease in dependent silent spaces, and was inversely correlated with the increase in non-dependent silent spaces, when applying high PEEP.ConclusionsRecruitment-to-inflation ratio may be useful to personalize PEEP in COVID-19-associated ARDS. Higher PEEP in prone position and lower PEEP in prone position decreased the amount of dependent silent spaces (suggesting lung collapse) without increasing the amount of non-dependent silent spaces (suggesting overinflation) in high recruiter and in low recruiter, respectively.

Effect of EIT-guided PEEP titration on prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAcute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration can achieve the compromise between lung overdistension and collapse which may minimize ventilator-induced lung injury in these patients. However, the effect of EIT-guided PEEP titration on the clinical outcomes remains unknown. The objective of this trial is to investigate the effects of EIT-guided PEEP titration on the clinical outcomes for moderate or severe ARDS, compared to the low fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)-PEEP table.MethodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, parallel-group, adaptive designed, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis. Adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS less than 72 h after diagnosis will be included in this study. Participants in the intervention group will receive PEEP titrated by EIT with a stepwise decrease PEEP trial, whereas participants in the control group will select PEEP based on the low FiO2-PEEP table. Other ventilator parameters will be set according to the ARDSNet strategy. Participants will be followed up until 28 days after enrollment. Three hundred seventy-six participants will be recruited based on a 15% decrease of 28-day mortality in the intervention group, with an interim analysis for sample size re-estimation and futility assessment being undertaken once 188 participants have been recruited. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes include ventilator-free days and shock-free days at day 28, length of ICU and hospital stay, the rate of successful weaning, proportion requiring rescue therapies, compilations, respiratory variables, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA).DiscussionAs a heterogeneous syndrome, ARDS has different responses to treatment and further results in different clinical outcomes. PEEP selection will depend on the properties of patients and can be individually achieved by EIT. This study will be the largest randomized trial to investigate thoroughly the effect of individual PEEP titrated by EIT in moderate to severe ARDS patients to date.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov NCT05207202. First published on January 26, 2022.

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure upregulation on the right ventricle in critical patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: an observational cohort study

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the right ventricle (RV) of mechanical ventilation–assisted patients through echocardiography. Methods Seventy-six patients assisted with mechanical ventilation were enrolled in this study. Positive end-expiratory pressure was upregulated by 4 cm H2O to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome, wherein echocardiography was performed before and after this process. Hemodynamic data were also recorded. All variables were compared before and after PEEP upregulation. The effect of PEEP was also evaluated in patients with and without decreased static lung compliance (SLC). Results Positive end-expiratory pressure upregulation significantly affected the RV function. Remarkable differences were observed in the following: Tei index (P = 0.027), pulmonary artery pressure (P = 0.039), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = 0.014), early wave/atrial wave (P = 0.002), diaphragm excursion (P &lt; 0.001), inferior vena cava collapsing index (P &lt; 0.001), and SLC (P &lt; 0.001). There were no significant changes in heart rate, respiratory rate, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and base excess (P &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, the cardiac output of the RV was not significantly affected. In patients with decreased SLC (n = 41), there were more significant changes in diaphragm excursion (P &lt; 0.001), inferior vena cava collapse index (P = 0.025), pulmonary artery pressure (P &lt; 0.001), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P = 0.007) than in those without decreased SLC (n = 35). Conclusion Positive end-expiratory pressure upregulation significantly affected the RV function of critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, especially in those with decreased SLC.

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure in obese and non-obese severe brain injury patients: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP) had never been studied in obese patients with severe brain injury (SBI). The main aim was to evaluate the effect of PEEP on ICP in SBI patients with mechanical ventilation according to obesity status.MethodsSBI patients admitted to the ICU with mechanical ventilation between 2014 and 2015 were included. Demographic, hemodynamic, arterial blood gas, and ventilator data at the time of the paired PEEP and ICP observations were recorded and compared between obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese SBI patients. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to assess the relationship between PEEP and ICP in obese and non-obese SBI patients, respectively.ResultsSix hundred twenty-seven SBI patients were included, 407 (65%) non-obese and 220 (35%) obese patients. A total of 30,415 paired PEEP and ICP observations were recorded in these patients, 19,566 (64.3%) for non-obese and 10,849 (35.7%) for obese. In the multivariable analysis, a statistically significant relationship between PEEP and ICP was found in obese SBI patients, but not in non-obese ones. For every cmH2O increase in PEEP, there was a 0.19 mmHg increase in ICP (95% CI [0.05, 0.33], P = 0.007) and a 0.15 mmHg decrease in CPP (95% CI [-0.29, -0.01], P = 0.036) in obese SBI patients after adjusting for confounders.ConclusionsThe results suggested that, contrary to non-obese SBI patients, the application of PEEP may produce an increase in ICP in obese SBI patients. However, the effect was modest and may be clinically inconsequential.

Minimizing Lung Injury During Laparoscopy in Head-Down Tilt: A Physiological Cohort Study.

Increased intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy induces atelectasis. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can alleviate atelectasis but may cause hyperinflation. Cyclic opening of collapsed alveoli and hyperinflation can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and postoperative pulmonary complications. We aimed to study the effect of PEEP on atelectasis, lung stress, and hyperinflation during laparoscopy in the head-down (Trendelenburg) position. An open-label, repeated-measures, interventional, physiological cohort trial was designed. All participants were recruited from a single tertiary Belgian university hospital. Twenty-three nonobese patients scheduled for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position were recruited.We applied a decremental PEEP protocol: 15 (high), 10 and 5 (low) cm H 2 O. Atelectasis was studied with the lung ultrasound score, the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure, the arterial oxygen partial pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen concentration (P ao2 /Fi o2 ) ratio, and the dynamic respiratory system compliance. Global hyperinflation was evaluated by dead space volume, and regional ventilation was evaluated by lung ultrasound. Lung stress was estimated using the transpulmonary driving pressure and dynamic compliance. Data are reported as medians (25th-75th percentile). At 15, 10, and 5 cm H 2 O PEEP, the respective measurements were: lung ultrasound scores (%) 11 (0-22), 27 (11-39), and 53 (42-61) ( P < .001); end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (cm H 2 O) 0.9 (-0.6 to 1.7), -0.3 (-2.0 to 0.7), and -1.9 (-4.6 to -0.9) ( P < .001); P ao2 /Fi o2 ratios (mm Hg) 471 (435-538), 458 (410-537), and 431 (358-492) ( P < .001); dynamic respiratory system compliances (mL/cm H 2 O) 32 (26-36), 30 (25-34), and 27 (22-30) ( P < .001); driving pressures (cm H 2 O) 8.2 (7.5-9.5), 9.3 (8.5-11.1), and 11.0 (10.3-12.2) ( P < .001); and alveolar dead space ventilation fractions (%) 10 (9-12), 10 (9-12), and 9 (8-12) ( P = .23). The lung ultrasound score was similar between apical and basal lung regions at each PEEP level ( P = .76, .37, and .76, respectively). Higher PEEP levels during laparoscopy in the head-down position facilitate lung-protective ventilation. Atelectasis and lung stress are reduced in the absence of global alveolar hyperinflation.

Homogenizing effect of PEEP on tidal volume distribution during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist: study of an animal model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

BackgroundThe physiological response and the potentially beneficial effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for lung protection and optimization of ventilation during spontaneous breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are not fully understood. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of different PEEP levels on tidal volume distribution and on the ventilation of dependent lung region during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA).MethodsARDS-like lung injury was induced by using saline lavage in 10 anesthetized and spontaneously breathing farm-bred pigs. The animals were ventilated in NAVA modality and tidal volume distribution as well as dependent lung ventilation were assessed using electric impedance tomography during the application of PEEP levels from 0 to 15 cmH20, in steps of 3 cmH20. Tidal volume distribution and dependent fraction of ventilation were analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Furthermore, airway, esophageal and transpulmonary pressure, as well as airway flow and delivered volume, were continuously measured during the assisted spontaneous breathing.ResultsIncreasing PEEP improved oxygenation and re-distributed tidal volume. Specifically, ventilation distribution changed from a predominant non-dependent to a more even distribution between non-dependent and dependent areas of the lung. Dependent fraction of ventilation reached 47 ± 9% at PEEP 9 cmH20. Further increasing PEEP led to a predominant dependent ventilation.ConclusionDuring assisted spontaneous breathing in this model of induced ARDS, PEEP modifies the distribution of ventilation and can achieve a homogenizing effect on its spatial arrangement. The study indicates that PEEP is an important factor during assisted spontaneous breathing and that EIT can be of valuable interest when titrating PEEP level during spontaneous breathing, by indicating the most homogeneous distribution of gas volumes throughout the PEEP spectrum.

Positive end expiratory pressure and respiratory system resistance between self-inflating bag and T-piece resuscitator in a cadaveric piglet lung model.

In neonatal resuscitation, T-piece resuscitator (TPR) are used widely, but the evidence is limited for their use in infants born at term gestation. The aim of this study was to compare the delivered positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and respiratory system resistance (Rrs) using TPR and self-inflating bag (SIB) in a cadaveric piglet model. Cadaveric newborn piglets were tracheotomised, intubated (cuffed tube) and leak tested. Static lung compliance was measured. Positive pressure ventilation was applied by TPR and SIB in a randomized sequence with varying, inflations per minute (40, 60 and 80 min) and peak inspiratory pressures (18 and 30 cmH2O). PEEP was constant at 5 cmH2O. The lungs were washed with saline and static lung compliance was re-measured; ventilation sequences were repeated. Lung inflation data for the respiratory mechanics were measured using a respiratory function monitor and digitally recorded for both pre and post-lung wash inflation sequences. A paired sample t-test was used to compare the mean and standard deviation. The mean difference in PEEP (TPR vs. SIB) was statistically significant at higher inflation rates of 60 and 80 bpm. At normal lung compliance, mean difference was 1.231 (p = 0.000) and 2.099 (p = 0.000) with PIP of 18 and 30 cmH2O respectively. Significantly higher Rrs were observed when using a TPR with higher inflation rates of 60 and 80 bpm at varying lung compliance. TPR is associated with significantly higher PEEP in a compliant lung model, which is probably related to the resistance of the TPR circuit. The effect of inadvertent PEEP on lung mechanics and hemodynamics need to be examined in humans. Further studies are needed to assess devices used to provide PEEP (TPR, SIB with PEEP valve, Anaesthetic bag with flow valve) during resuscitation of the newborn.