Coleridge was always intrigued by the power of sound, particularly by the effects of meter in poetry. He considered himself one of those poets who few or no proper pictures, but a magnificent mirage of words instead--and gives you the subjective associations of the Poet instead of the external object. (1) His delight in sound arranged metrically for its own sake is shown in verses he wrote for young Derwent Coleridge in 1807, beginning: Trochee / trips from / long to / short: From long / to long / in sol/emn sort Slow SPONDEE stalks--strong Foot! yet ill able Ever to / come up with / DACTYL tri/syllable. IAMBICS march from short to long: With a Leap / and a Bound the swift ANAPESTS throng! (2) In his serious poetry, Coleridge was a master of musicality, and usually he achieved his tonal effects in the traditional English manner of exploiting the interplay of meter, rhythm, and phrasing. However, he also experimented metrically, and the most ambitious of these experiments was Christabel, in the preface to which he declared: ... The metre of the Christabel is not, properly speaking, irregular, though it may seem so from its being founded on a new principle: namely, that of counting in each line the accents, not the syllables. Though the latter may vary from seven to twelve, yet in each line the accents will be found to be only four. Nevertheless this occasional variation in number of syllables is not introduced wantonly, or for the mere ends of convenience, but in correspondence with some transition, in the nature of the imagery or passion. (3) As is well known, Coleridge and some of his friends believed that the meter of Christabel had been appropriated (at least in part) by Walter Scott for The Lay of the Last Minstrel, a poem published in 1805 while Coleridge's was still in manuscript, where it would remain for eleven more years. There have been excellent articles on the meter of Christabel, on what Scott derived from it, and on the legal and philosophical aspects of Scott's supposed appropriation. (4) Here I want to discuss Coleridge's attitude(s) toward Scott's metrical borrowing. Briefly, Coleridge habitually circulated manuscripts of his poems among his friends, and recited them whether or not they were in print. In 1800, he is thought to have given a (now lost) holograph of Christabel to his friend John Stoddart, who in 1802 recited it to Scott. (5) Scott enjoyed memorizing and reciting poems that he liked--at a literary gathering in 1803 Coleridge was startled to hear Scott recite Fire, Famine, and Slaughter, which Coleridge had published under a pseudonym some four years earlier. (6) Also, in 1803, Dorothy and William Wordsworth heard Scott recite part of The Lay of the Last Minstrel, then in progress. Dorothy Wordsworth later wrote to Lady Beaumont: He [Scott} said to us that at that time he had begun his poem and was much delighted to meet with so happy a specimen of the same kind of irregular metre which he had adopted. This was when we were in Scotland and he recited to us a part of the Poem which he was then composing. We were struck with the resemblance yet we were both equally convinced from the frankness of Walter Scott's manner that it was an unconscious imitation. Since The Lay of the last Minstrel has been published, William has blamed himself exceedingly for not having mentioned to Walter Scott the apprehension that he had that the style of his Poem had been, and would be in its future progress influenced by his acquaintance with Christabel, and also that he did not point out one expression which was the same. (7) She continued: For my part I do not think the Imitations are of so much importance, Coleridge's poem bearing upon its face so bold a character of origi[nality], and I cannot but add being so very much superior to the other, but my Brother and Sister think that the Lay being published first it will tarnish the freshness of Christabel and considerably injure the first effect of it. …