The effects of aldehyde fixation on the structure of tight junctions in rat liver and small intestine were studied by quantitations of freeze-fractured material. The length of fibrils in percentage of the total length of the junctional strands (ridges) on P-faces and the number of particles per micrometer of E-face groove were calculated in a series of experiments. After fixation in 2.5% glutaraldehyde (GA) for 1 or 3 hr, the tight junctions of liver and small intestine were comprised of strands with about 60–80% fibrils on the P-faces, whereas the E-face grooves exhibited only a very few particles (2–5/ μm). When the tissue was fixed in 0.1% GA for 24 hr similar results were obtained. However, with decreasing time of fixation (3 hr, 1 hr, 15 min, and 0 min) in 0.1% GA before glycerol cryoprotection, a significant decrease in percentage fibrils and a corresponding increase in number of particles per micrometer of E-face groove were seen. In the 15- and 0-min material, values of only about 1–3% fibrils and as much as about 60 particles per micrometer were obtained. In fresh-frozen material (nonfixed, noncryoprotected) fibrils were completely absent and all tight junction particles (approximately 65/μm) were located in chains on the E-faces. After fixation in 1.5% formaldehyde for 1 and 3 hr, only about 6 and 9% fibrils in the liver, and about 4 and 15% fibrils in the small intestine, were obtained. With respect to E-face grooves, about 31 and 25, and 44 and 42 particles per micrometer of liver and small intestine, respectively, were obtained. These results indicate that the tight junction fibrils may be polymerization products caused by the formidable crosslinking effect of GA. It is suggested that tight junctions in vivo are comprised of discrete integral proteins with stronger binding to the external side of the membrane or to opposing junctional proteins in the adjacent membrane than to the inner side of the membrane. However, GA fixation causes (1) lateral linking of the junctional proteins resulting in the formation of fibrils, and (2) binding of the fibrils to the protein-rich inner or cytoplasmic side of the membrane. Some functional consequences of this concept are considered.