Effects Of Cannabinoid Receptor Activation Research Articles

The Role of Cannabinoid Receptor 1 in the Immunopathology of Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Endocannabinoid system plays an important role in pathophysiologic processes such as immune functions and impacts on disease severity. Our previous study showed that cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) affects clinical course of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. In this study, we investigated the role of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) in RSV immunopathology and its therapeutic potential in mice model. To study the role of CB1 receptors in the immunopathology of RSV, CB1 was blocked daily with AM281 as a selective antagonist in Balb/c mice and were infected by intranasal inoculation of RSV-A2 24 h following the first dose of antagonist administration. The potential pharmacological therapeutic effects of cannabinoid receptor activation during RSV infection were studied using JZL184 as a selective indirect agonist, 24 h after infection. Mice were sacrificed on day 5 after infection and experimental analyses were performed to study the CB1 receptor expression, airway immune cell influx, cytokine/chemokine secretion, lung histopathology, and viral load. RSV infection of airways significantly induced the expression of CB1 receptors in lung cells of mice. Blockade of CB1 receptors using AM281 enhanced immune cell influx and cytokine/chemokine production, and aggravated lung pathology. Activation of cannabinoid receptors using JZL184 decreased immune cell influx and cytokine/chemokine production, and alleviated lung pathology. This study and our previous finding indicated that endocannabinoid signaling regulates the inflammatory response to RSV infection, and is a potential therapeutic candidate for alleviation of RSV-associated immunopathology.

Effects of cannabinoid receptor activation by CP55,940 on normal bladder function and irritation-induced bladder overactivity in non-awake anaesthetised rats.

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of CP55,940 on normal bladder function in vivo and examine whether it suppresses urinary frequency induced by nociceptive stimuli in the bladder. Cannabinoid receptor (CBR) activity may be involved in the regulation of bladder function. However, the role of CBR subtypes in micturition has yet to be established. CP55,940 is a synthetic analogue of tetrahydrocannabidiol, which is a psychoactive ingredient of the Cannabis plant. Cystometry under urethane anaesthesia was performed to evaluate the effect of intravesical delivery of CP55,940 with or without administration of CB1 antagonist AM251 or CB2 antagonist AM630 on bladder function in female rats. The effects of CP55,940 were also examined in rats with urinary irritation induced by intravesical infusion of acetic acid. Infusion of CP55,940 significantly (p < 0.05) increased micturition interval (MI) and bladder capacity (BC) by 52% and decreased maximal voiding pressure (MP) by 25%. Pretreatment with AM251 or AM630 before CP55,940 administration prevented CP55,940-induced increases in MI, BC and reduced MP. Acetic acid induced urinary frequency as evidenced by a reduction in MI and was suppressed by CP55,940. CP55,940 decreases bladder activity and urinary frequency induced by nociceptive stimuli, probably by suppression of bladder afferent activity. Effects of CP55,940 were abolished by both CBR antagonists. This data implicates a role for the endocannabinoid system in bladder mechanoafferent function in rats. In addition, our results show that CP55,940 reverses urinary frequency exemplified in an overactive bladder model, suggesting it could be an effective treatment for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Effect of cannabinoid receptor activation on spreading depression.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cannabinoid on cortical spreading depression (CSD) in rat brain. Cannabis has been used for centuries for both symptomatic and prophylactic treatment of different types of headaches including migraine. CSD is believed to be a putative neuronal mechanism underlying migraine aura and subsequent pain. The effects of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), as well as, cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists on CSD in rat neocortical slices were investigated. Furthermore, the effect of cannabinoid CB1 agonist was tested on field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) and long-term potentiation (LTP). HC (1-20 microM) dose dependently suppressed CSD amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity. Cannabinoid CB1 agonist, WIN 55,212-2 mesylate (1-10 microM), also significantly suppressed all characteristic features of CSD. However, cannabinoid CB2 agonist, JWH-133 (1-20 microM), did not affect CSD. FEPSP and induction of LTP were suppressed by application of WIN55212-2. Suppression of CSD by activation of CB1 receptors points to the potential therapeutic effects of cannabinoids in migraine with aura. More research is needed before we know whether cannabinoids may be helpful in treating migraine pain.

Circulating Endocannabinoid Concentrations and Sexual Arousal in Women

Several lines of evidence point to the potential role of the endocannabinoid system in female sexual functioning. These include results from studies describing the subjective effects of exogenous cannabinoids on sexual functioning in humans and the observable effects of exogenous cannabinoids on sexual functioning in other species, as well as results from studies investigating the location of cannabinoid receptors in the brain and periphery, and the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on neurotransmitters implicated in sexual functioning. While these lines of research suggest a role for the endocannabinoid system in female sexual functioning, no studies investigating the relationship between concentrations of endogenous cannabinoids (i.e., arachidonoylethanolamide [AEA] and 2-arachidonoylglycerol [2-AG]) and sexual functioning have been conducted in any species. To measure circulating endocannabinoid concentrations in relation to subjective and physiological indices of sexual arousal in women (N = 21). Serum endocannabinoid (AEA and 2-AG) concentrations were measured immediately prior to, and immediately following, viewing of neutral (control) and erotic (experimental) film stimuli in a repeated measures design. Physiological sexual arousal was measured via vaginal photoplethysmography. Subjective sexual arousal was measured both continuously and noncontinuously. Pearson's correlations were used to investigate the relationships between endocannabinoid concentrations and sexual arousal. Changes in AEA and 2-AG concentrations from pre- to post-film and in relation to physiological and subjective indices of sexual arousal. Results revealed a significant relationship between endocannabinoid concentrations and female sexual arousal, whereby increases in both physiological and subjective indices of sexual arousal were significantly associated with decreases in AEA, and increases in subjective indices of sexual arousal were significantly associated with decreases in 2-AG. These findings support the hypothesis that the endocannabinoid system is involved in female sexual functioning, with implications for furthering understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying female sexual functioning.

Mechanistic and Pharmacological Characterization of PF-04457845: A Highly Potent and Selective Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor That Reduces Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Pain

The endogenous cannabinoid (endocannabinoid) anandamide is principally degraded by the integral membrane enzyme fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Pharmacological blockade of FAAH has emerged as a potentially attractive strategy for augmenting endocannabinoid signaling and retaining the beneficial effects of cannabinoid receptor activation, while avoiding the undesirable side effects, such as weight gain and impairments in cognition and motor control, observed with direct cannabinoid receptor 1 agonists. Here, we report the detailed mechanistic and pharmacological characterization of N-pyridazin-3-yl-4-(3-{[5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridin-2-yl]oxy}benzylidene)piperidine-1-carboxamide (PF-04457845), a highly efficacious and selective FAAH inhibitor. Mechanistic studies confirm that PF-04457845 is a time-dependent, covalent FAAH inhibitor that carbamylates FAAH's catalytic serine nucleophile. PF-04457845 inhibits human FAAH with high potency (k(inact)/K(i) = 40,300 M(-1)s(-1); IC(50) = 7.2 nM) and is exquisitely selective in vivo as determined by activity-based protein profiling. Oral administration of PF-04457845 produced potent antinociceptive effects in both inflammatory [complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)] and noninflammatory (monosodium iodoacetate) pain models in rats, with a minimum effective dose of 0.1 mg/kg (CFA model). PF-04457845 displayed a long duration of action as a single oral administration at 1 mg/kg showed in vivo efficacy for 24 h with a concomitant near-complete inhibition of FAAH activity and maximal sustained elevation of anandamide in brain. Significantly, PF-04457845-treated mice at 10 mg/kg elicited no effect in motility, catalepsy, and body temperature. Based on its exceptional selectivity and in vivo efficacy, combined with long duration of action and optimal pharmacokinetic properties, PF-04457845 is a clinical candidate for the treatment of pain and other nervous system disorders.

The Role of Cannabinoids in Modulating Emotional and Non-Emotional Memory Processes in the Hippocampus

Cannabinoid agonists generally have a disruptive effect on memory, learning, and operant behavior that is considered to be hippocampus-dependent. Nevertheless, under certain conditions, cannabinoid receptor activation may facilitate neuronal learning processes. For example, CB1 receptors are essential for the extinction of conditioned fear associations, indicating an important role for this receptor in neuronal emotional learning and memory. This review examines the diverse effects of cannabinoids on hippocampal memory and plasticity. It shows how the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation may vary depending on the route of administration, the nature of the task (aversive or not), and whether it involves emotional memory formation (e.g., conditioned fear and extinction learning) or non-emotional memory formation (e.g., spatial learning). It also examines the memory stage under investigation (acquisition, consolidation, retrieval, extinction), and the brain areas involved. Differences between the effects of exogenous and endogenous agonists are also discussed. The apparently biphasic effects of cannabinoids on anxiety is noted as this implies that the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on hippocampal learning and memory may be attributable to a general modulation of anxiety or stress levels and not to memory per se. The review concludes that cannabinoids have diverse effects on hippocampal memory and plasticity that cannot be categorized simply into an impairing or an enhancing effect. A better understanding of the involvement of cannabinoids in memory processes will help determine whether the benefits of the clinical use of cannabinoids outweigh the risks of possible memory impairments.

Direct and Indirect Effects of Cannabinoids on in vitro GABA Release in the Rat Arcuate Nucleus

Within the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, two neuronal subpopulations play particularly important roles in energy balance; neurones expressing neuropeptide Y (NPY), agouti-related peptide (AgRP) and GABA are orexigenic, whereas neurones expressing pro-opiomelanocortin and CART are anorexigenic. The pivotal role of these neuropeptides in energy homeostasis is well-known, although GABA may also be an important signal because targeted knockout of the GABA transporter in NPY/AgRP/GABA neurones results in a lean, obesity-resistant phenotype. In the present study, we describe an in vitro model of K(+)-evoked GABA release from the hypothalamus and determine the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation. K(+)-evoked GABA release was sensitive to leptin, insulin and PYY(3-36), indicating that GABA was released by arcuate NPY/AgRP/GABA neurones. In the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX), the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 inhibited K(+)-evoked GABA release. This was prevented by the CB1 receptor inverse agonist rimonabant. Rimonabant had no effect when applied alone. In the absence of TTX, however, the opposite effects were observed: WIN 55,212-2 had no effect while rimonabant inhibited GABA release. This indicates that GABA release can involve an indirect, TTX-sensitive mechanism. The most parsimonious explanation for the inhibition of GABA release by a CB receptor inverse agonist is via the disinhibition of an cannabinoid-sensitive inhibitory input onto GABAergic neurones. One local source of an inhibitory neurotransmitter is the opioidergic arcuate neurones. In our in vitro model, K(+)-evoked GABA release was inhibited by the endogenous opioid peptide beta-endorphin in a naloxone-sensitive manner. The inhibitory effect of rimonabant was also prevented by naloxone and a kappa-opioid receptor selective antagonist, suggesting that GABA release from arcuate NPY/AgRP/GABA neurones can be inhibited by endogenous opioid peptides, and that the release of opioid peptides is sensitive to cannabinoids.

Neurochemical evidence that stimulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors on GABAergic nerve terminals activates the dopaminergic reward system by increasing dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens

We examined the effect of cannabinoid receptor activation on basal and electrical field simulation-evoked (25 V, 2 Hz, 240 shocks) [ 3H]dopamine efflux in the isolated rat nucleus accumbens in a preparation, in which any effect on the dendrites or somata of ventral tegmental projection neurons was excluded. The cannabinoid agonist (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate (WIN55,212-2, 100 nM) significantly enhanced stimulation-evoked [ 3H]dopamine release in the presence of the selective dopamine transporter inhibitor 1-[2-[bis-(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine dihydrochloride (GBR12909, 100 nM). GBR12909 (100 nM–1 μM), when added alone, increased the evoked [ 3H]dopamine efflux in a concentration-dependent manner. The stimulatory effect of WIN55,212-2 on the evoked tritium efflux was inhibited by the selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251, 100 nM) and by the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline (10 μM). Repeated application of N-methyl- d aspartate (1 mM) under Mg 2+-free conditions, which directly acts on dopaminergic terminals, reversibly increased the tritium efflux, but WIN55,212-2 did not affect N-methyl- d aspartate-evoked [ 3H]dopamine efflux, indicating that WIN55,212-2 has no direct action on dopaminergic nerve terminals. AM251 (100 nM) alone also did not have an effect on electrical stimulation-evoked [ 3H]dopamine efflux. Likewise, the selective CB2 receptor antagonist 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl](4-methoxyphenyl)methanone (AM630, 0.3 μM) and the anandamide transport inhibitor (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-N-(4-hydroxy-2-methylphenyl)-5,8,11,14-eicosatetraenamide (VDM11, 10 μM) had no significant effect on electrically evoked [ 3H]dopamine release. This is the first neurochemical evidence that the activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors leads to the augmentation of [ 3H]dopamine efflux via a local GABA A receptor-mediated disinhibitory mechanism in the rat nucleus accumbens.

Cannabinoid receptor activation reverses kainate-induced synchronized population burst firing in rat hippocampus

Cannabinoids have been shown to possess anticonvulsant properties in whole animal models of epilepsy. The present investigation sought to examine the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on kainic acid (KA)-induced epileptiform neuronal excitability. Under urethane anesthesia, acute KA treatment (10 mg kg−1, i.p.) entrained the spiking mode of simultaneously recorded neurons from random firing to synchronous bursting (% change in burst rate). Injection of the high-affinity cannabinoid agonist (-)-11-hydroxy-8-tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethyl-heptyl (HU210, 100 μg kg−1, i.p.) following KA markedly reduced the burst frequency (% decrease in burst frequency) and reversed synchronized firing patterns back to baseline levels. Pre-treatment with the central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-clorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyrazole-carboxamide (rimonabant, SR141716A 3 mg kg−1, i.p.) completely prevented the actions of HU210. The present results indicate that cannabinoids exert their antiepileptic effects by impeding pathological synchronization of neuronal networks in the hippocampus.

Post‐ischemic brain damage: the endocannabinoid system in the mechanisms of neuronal death

An emerging body of evidence supports a key role for the endocannabinoid system in numerous physiological and pathological mechanisms of the central nervous system. In the recent past, many experimental studies have examined the putative protective or toxic effects of drugs interacting with cannabinoid receptors or have measured the brain levels of endocannabinoids in in vitro and in vivo models of cerebral ischemia. The results of these studies have been rather conflicting in supporting either a beneficial or a detrimental role for the endocannabinoid system in post-ischemic neuronal death, in that cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists have both been demonstrated to produce either protective or toxic responses in ischemia, depending on a number of factors. Among these, the dose of the administered drug and the specific endocannabinoid that accumulates in each particular model appear to be of particular importance. Other mechanisms that have been put forward to explain these discrepant results are the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on the modulation of excitatory and inhibitory transmission, the vasodilatory and hypothermic effects of cannabinoids, and their activation of cytoprotective signaling pathways. Alternative mechanisms that appear to be independent from cannabinoid receptor activation have also been suggested. Endocannabinoids probably participate in the mechanisms that are triggered by the initial ischemic stimulus and lead to delayed neuronal death. However, further information is needed before pharmacological modulation of the endocannabinoid system may prove useful for therapeutic intervention in stroke and related ischemic syndromes.

Cannabinoid (CB1) Receptor Activation Inhibits Trigeminovascular Neurons

Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder that involves activation or the perception of activation of the trigeminovascular system. Cannabinoid (CB) receptors are present in brain and have been suggested to be antinociceptive. Here we determined the effect of cannabinoid receptor activation on neurons with trigeminovascular nociceptive input in the rat. Neurons in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) were studied using extracellular electrophysiological techniques. Responses to both dural electrical stimulation and cutaneous facial receptive field activation of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the effect of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists were studied. Nonselective CB receptor activation with R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2, 3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl) (WIN55,212; 1 mg kg(-1)) inhibited neuronal responses to A-(by 52%) and C-fiber (by 44%) afferents, an effect blocked by the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; 3 mg kg(-1)] but not the CB2 receptor antagonist AM630 (6-iodopravadoline; 3 mg kg(-1)). Anandamide (10 mg kg(-1)) was able to inhibit both A- and C-fiber-elicited TCC firing, only after transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptor inhibition. Activation of cannabinoid receptors had no effect on cutaneous receptive fields when recorded from TCC neurons. The data show that manipulation of CB1 receptors can affect the responses of trigeminal neurons with A- and C-fiber inputs from the dura mater. This may be a direct effect on neurons in the TCC itself or an effect in discrete areas of the brain that innervate these neurons. The data suggest that CB receptors may have therapeutic potential in migraine, cluster headache, or other primary headaches, although the potential hazards of psychoactive side effects that accompany cannabinoid treatments may be complex to overcome.

Segregation of two endocannabinoid‐hydrolyzing enzymes into pre‐ and postsynaptic compartments in the rat hippocampus, cerebellum and amygdala

Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) and monoglyceride lipase (MGL) catalyse the hydrolysis of the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. We investigated their ultrastructural distribution in brain areas where the localization and effects of cannabinoid receptor activation are known. In the hippocampus, FAAH was present in somata and dendrites of principal cells, but not in interneurons. It was located mostly on the membrane surface of intracellular organelles known to store Ca(2+) (e.g. mitochondria, smooth endoplasmic reticulum), less frequently on the somatic or dendritic plasma membrane. MGL immunoreactivity was found in axon terminals of granule cells, CA3 pyramidal cells and some interneurons. In the cerebellum, Purkinje cells and their dendrites are intensively immunoreactive for FAAH, together with a sparse axon plexus at the border of the Purkinje cell/granule cell layers. Immunostaining for MGL was complementary, the axons in the molecular layer were intensively labelled leaving the Purkinje cell dendrites blank. FAAH distribution in the amygdala was similar to that of the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor: evident signal in neuronal somata and proximal dendrites in the basolateral nucleus, and hardly any labelling in the central nucleus. MGL staining was restricted to axons in the neuropil, with similar relative signal intensities seen for FAAH in different nuclei. Thus, FAAH is primarily a postsynaptic enzyme, whereas MGL is presynaptic. FAAH is associated with membranes of cytoplasmic organelles. The differential compartmentalization of the two enzymes suggests that anandamide and 2-AG signalling may subserve functional roles that are spatially segregated at least at the stage of metabolism.

Mechanism of Cannabinoid Effects on Long-Term Potentiation and Depression in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons

Cannabinoids, the active constituents of marijuana, are known to impair learning and memory. Receptors for cannabinoids are highly expressed in the hippocampus, a brain region that is believed to play an important role in certain forms of learning and memory. To investigate the possible contribution of cannabinoid receptor-mediated deficits in hippocampal function to the learning and memory impairments produced by marijuana, we studied the effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on two models of learning and memory, long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), in hippocampal slices. Although LTP and LTD of CA1 field potentials were blocked by cannabinoid receptor activation in the presence of Mg(2+), they could be induced after Mg(2+) was removed. Similarly, LTP and LTD of whole-cell EPSCs were unimpaired in the presence of cannabinoid receptor agonist when the postsynaptic membrane was depolarized during the LTP or LTD induction protocol. Cannabinoid receptor activation also reduced EPSCs and enhanced paired-pulse facilitation, while having no effect on the amplitude of spontaneous miniature EPSCs. Finally, as with cannabinoid receptor activation, inhibition of LTP by adenosine receptor activation could be overcome by removal of Mg(2+) or depolarization of the postsynaptic membrane during tetanus. Our results indicate that cannabinoid receptor activation does not directly inhibit the molecular mechanisms responsible for long-term synaptic plasticity but instead impairs LTP and LTD by reducing presynaptic neurotransmitter release to a level below that required to depolarize the postsynaptic membrane to relieve Mg(2+) blockade of NMDA receptors.

Cannabinoid modulation of intestinal propulsion in mice.

The effect of cannabinoid receptor activation and blockade on the propulsive activity in the mouse small intestine was assessed in the present study by measuring the transit of an orally administered, non-absorbable marker. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 (R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de-1, 4benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate) inhibited, while the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A (N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-3-pyraz ole-carboxamide) stimulated the marker transit. Furthermore, a per se non-effective dose of SR 141716A reversed WIN 55,212-2-induced reduction of the transit. The results of the present study suggest a role for cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the control of propulsive activity in the mouse small intestine.

Examination of the effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, CP 55,940, on electrically evoked transmitter release from rat brain slices

In the present study we examined the effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist, {[1a,2-( R)-5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-[5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl]-phenol; CP 55,940} on [ 14C]acetylcholine and [ 3H]norepinephrine release from hippocampal slices and on [ 14C]acetylcholine release from striatal slices. CP 55,940 potently inhibited electrically evoked [ 14C]acetylcholine release from hippocampal slices, with an EC 50 of 0.02 μM and a maximal inhibition of 61% at 1 μM. The inhibition of acetylcholine release by CP 55,940 was partially antagonized (60%) by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist, {[ N-piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1 H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride; SR 141716A}. Alone, SR 141716A significantly enhanced stimulated [ 14C]acetylcholine release. In contrast to the effects of CP 55,940 on [ 14C]acetylcholine release, electrically evoked [ 3H]norepinephrine release from hippocampal slices and [ 14C]acetylcholine release from striatal slices were both unaffected by this compound. Similarly, hippocampal [ 3H]norepinephrine release and striatal [ 14C]acetylcholine release were not affected by SR 141716A. In conclusion, the results of this study extend our previous data indicating that cannabinoid receptors modulate acetylcholine release in the hippocampus. The effects of cannabinoid receptor activation on [ 3H]acetylcholine release in the hippocampus does not appear to extend to [ 3H]norepinephrine release from this region or to acetylcholine release from the striatum. © 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.