Abstract Background Educational inequalities in mortality continue to persist. We aimed to systematically analyse the association between level of education and cervical cancer mortality. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We systematically searched Pub-Med, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE and Global Health (CAB), EconLit and Sociology Source Ultimate databases. A protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023411757). We included studies that measured the association between level of education and cervical cancer mortality using individual level data. Included articles were assessed for study quality and risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the overall and stratified effects of education on mortality. Findings Our literature search resulted in over 47,000 articles. 30 studies mentioned cervical cancer as a cause of death, and of these, 11 were eligible for the meta-analysis. Results showed an overall risk ratio of 2.41 (95% CI 1.81-3.20) for low education (ISCED 0-2) and 1.62 (95% CI 1.18-2.24) for medium education (ISCED 3-4). Those aged 25-64 with low education had more than twice the risk of cervical cancer (RR = 5.73; 95% CI 5.04-6.51) compared to those aged 25 and above (RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.82-2.45). Besides, the impact of an additional level of education on reducing risk of cervical cancer mortality was higher in Northern Europe, compared to the South. Interpretation Lower educational attainment is associated with an increase in the risk of cervical cancer mortality, with an additional level of education greatly reducing this risk in Northern Europe. Younger cohorts with low education have a higher risk of cervical cancer mortality. This study provides important information for evidence-based policy seeking to reduce health inequities and inequalities in both the health and education sector. Key messages • Lower educational attainment is linked to a higher risk of cervical cancer mortality. • Younger cohorts (aged 25-64) with low education are at a particularly heightened risk compared to those aged 25 and above.
Read full abstract