Patient Education Research Articles

Cost minimization analysis of chronic kidney disease management: Evaluating economic strategies for early intervention and treatment optimization

Chronic kidney disease is a common global health condition characterized by progressive loss of kidney function and significant cost burden on the healthcare system worldwide. The disease often coexists with conditions such as diabetes and hypertension, further complicates its management and increasing associated costs. Effective economic management, particularly in the early stages of CKD, is crucial for reducing long-term healthcare expenses and improving patient outcomes. This review examines the utility of cost minimization analysis (CMA) as a strategic tool for evaluating economic options in CKD management. CMA is an economic evaluation method that compares the costs of different therapeutic interventions that have demonstrated equivalent clinical effectiveness, thereby aiding healthcare providers and policymakers in identifying the most cost-efficient options to optimize resource utilization. This review highlights the economic impact of CKD, focusing on the increasing costs linked to advanced disease management and the essential role of early diagnosis and intervention in reducing these costs and explores various cost-effective strategies for CKD management, including pharmacological treatments, lifestyle modifications, and patient education, to identify approaches that are both clinically and economically advantageous. Additionally, the broader implications of cost minimization for healthcare policy, clinical decision-making, and resource allocation are discussed for their significance in a resource-limited healthcare setting. Evidence indicates that prioritizing cost-effective CKD management through early intervention and preventive care can significantly lower healthcare expenditures, slow the disease progression, and enhance patient’s quality of life. By adopting such strategies, healthcare systems can achieve better clinical outcomes and ensure financial sustainability.

Pharmacists in global primary healthcare systems: A comprehensive model for community health empowerment

Pharmacists play an increasingly important role in global primary healthcare systems, evolving from traditional dispensers to active participants in patient-centered care. This paper advocates for the stronger integration of pharmacists into healthcare teams to improve patient outcomes, medication adherence, and overall healthcare delivery. Through a comprehensive review, we examine the evolving role of pharmacists, the key challenges to their full integration, and the substantial opportunities they present, particularly in managing chronic diseases, providing preventative care, and enhancing patient education. We propose a model for empowering pharmacists to contribute more effectively to community health, especially in underserved areas. The paper also highlights the potential global impact of pharmacists in reducing healthcare costs, improving disease management, and promoting public health initiatives. Lastly, recommendations for future policy reforms, education enhancements, and research directions are offered to support the continued expansion of pharmacists' roles in primary healthcare systems worldwide.

Can ChatGPT provide quality information about fever in children?

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems hold great promise in improving medical care and health problems. We aimed to evaluate the answers by asking the most frequently asked questions to ChatGPT for the prediction and treatment of fever, which is a major problem in children. The 50 questions most frequently asked about fever in children were determined, and we asked them to ChatGPT. We evaluated the responses using the quality and readability scales. While ChatGPT demonstrated good quality in its responses, the readability scale and the Patient Education Material Evaluation Tool (PEMAT) scale used with materials appearing on the site were also found to be successful. Among the scales in which we evaluated ChatGPT responses, a weak positive relationship was found between Gunning Fog (GFOG) and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) scores (r = 0.379) and a significant and positive relationship was found between FGL and SMOG scores (r = 0.899). This study sheds light on the quality and readability of information regarding the presentation of AI tools, such as ChatGPT, regarding fever, a common complaint in children. We determined that the answers to the most frequently asked questions about fire were high-quality, reliable, easy to read and understandable.

Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Common Patient Questions on Bone Sarcoma.

The potential impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots on care for patients with bone sarcoma is poorly understood. Elucidating potential risks and benefits would allow surgeons to define appropriate roles for these tools in clinical care. Eleven questions on bone sarcoma diagnosis, treatment, and recovery were inputted into three AI chatbots. Answers were assessed on a 5-point Likert scale for five clinical accuracy metrics: relevance to the question, balance and lack of bias, basis on established data, factual accuracy, and completeness in scope. Responses were quantitatively assessed for empathy and readability. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) was assessed for understandability and actionability. Chatbots scored highly on relevance (4.24) and balance/lack of bias (4.09) but lower on basing responses on established data (3.77), completeness (3.68), and factual accuracy (3.66). Responses generally scored well on understandability (84.30%), while actionability scores were low for questions on treatment (64.58%) and recovery (60.64%). GPT-4 exhibited the highest empathy (4.12). Readability scores averaged between 10.28 for diagnosis questions to 11.65 for recovery questions. While AI chatbots are promising tools, current limitations in factual accuracy and completeness, as well as concerns of inaccessibility to populations with lower health literacy, may significantly limit their clinical utility.

Videos in Short-Video Sharing Platforms as Sources of Information on Colorectal Polyps: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.

Short videos have demonstrated huge potential in disseminating health information in recent years. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined information about colorectal polyps on short-video sharing platforms. This study aimed to analyze the content and quality of colorectal polyps-related videos on short-video sharing platforms. The terms "" (intestinal polyps) or "" (colonic polyps) or "" (rectal polyps) or "" (colorectal polyps) or "" (polyps of large intestine) were used to search in TikTok (ByteDance), WeChat (Tencent Holdings Limited), and Xiaohongshu (Xingyin Information Technology Limited) between May 26 and June 8, 2024, and then the top 100 videos for each search term on different platforms were included and recorded. The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) score, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), the modified DISCERN, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) were used to evaluate the content and quality of selected videos by 2 independent researchers. SPSS (version 22.0; IBM Corp) and GraphPad Prism (version 9.0; Dotmatics) were used for analyzing the data. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the differences between groups were compared. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between quantitative variables. A total of 816 eligible videos were included for further analysis, which mainly conveyed disease-related knowledge (n=635, 77.8%). Most videos were uploaded by physicians (n=709, 86.9%). These videos had an average JAMA score of 2.0 (SD 0.6), GQS score of 2.5 (SD 0.8), modified DISCERN score of 2.5 (SD 0.8), understandability of 80.4% (SD 15.6%), and actionability of 42.2% (SD 36.1%). Videos uploaded by news agencies were of higher quality and received more likes and comments (all P<.05). The number of collections and shares of videos about posttreatment caveats were more than those for other content (P=.03 and P=.006). There was a positive correlation between the number of likes, comments, collections, and shares (all P<.001). The duration and the number of fans were positively correlated with the quality of videos (all P<.05). There are numerous videos about colorectal polyps on short-video sharing platforms, but the reliability and quality of these videos are not good enough and need to be improved.

Impact of prior knee surgery on change in knee pain, quality of life, and walking speed following supervised education and exercise therapy: an analysis of 30,545 people with knee osteoarthritis.

To investigate the impact of prior knee surgery on changes in outcomes following an 8-week supervised patient education and exercise therapy program in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients were classified according to knee surgery in the most affected knee joint (yes/no) prior to enrolment in the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) program. Between-group differences in outcome changes from baseline to 3 months follow-up were evaluated using linear regression stratified by sex. Outcomes were knee pain intensity (VAS, 0-100 mm), joint related quality of life (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subscale score (KOOS QOL, 0-100)) and walking speed (40-m fast-paced walk test). To evaluate clinically relevant between-group differences, proportions of patients reaching a threshold of minimal important change in the surgery and non-surgery groups were compared. Among 30,545 patients, 27% (n, 8254) had prior surgery in the most affected knee. The prior surgery and the non-surgery group experienced improvements in all outcomes with minor between-group differences in change in pain intensity (males, 0.03 95% CI - 0.9 to 1.0; females, 1.3 95% CI 0.6 to 2.1); KOOS QOL (males, 0.3 95% CI - 0.4 to 0.9; females 0.02 95% CI - 0.5 to 0.5); and walking speed (males, 0.01 95% CI - 0.01 to 0.02; females 0.01 95% CI 0.003 to 0.02). The responder analysis showed no clinically relevant between-group differences in improvements. Previous knee surgery does not seem to modify the clinical outcome following exercise therapy and patient education in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Use of chatgpt-4 to explain kawasaki disease to parents and paediatric trainees

Abstract Background Paediatric trainees and parents of Kawasaki disease (KD) patients may face challenges when managing the disease due to insufficient accessibility to KD information. Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) based on large language models may help explain KD information to paediatric trainees and patient parents. Purpose This study aims to determine the usefulness of Chat Generative Pre- Trained Transformer -4 (ChatGPT-4) in explaining Kawasaki Disease (KD) and its management to parents and paediatric trainees managing KD patients. Methods We created 2 sets of clinical scenarios. In the first set, ChatGPT-4 was instructed to respond to 10 questions based on enquiries from parents of KD patients. Responses were scored in terms of "factual accuracy", "coherence", "comprehensiveness", and "humaneness" by 3 paediatric cardiologists using Likert scale of 0-10. Readability were calculated using Flesch reading-ease test. In the second set, ChatGPT-4 was instructed to respond to 8 KD-related questions based on enquiries from paediatric trainees. Responses are graded based on "relevance", "reliability" and "comprehensiveness" using Likert scale of 0-10 by 3 paediatric cardiologists independently. Reviewers would determine whether major advice from chatGPT-4 would be adopted in clinical judgement. Results For parent-targeted responses, ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest scores in ‘humaneness’ (median 9.00, IQR 8.00 to 9.00) and ‘coherence’ (median 8.00, IQR 7.00 to 8.00). Inaccurate information regarding disease prognosis, actions as well as prescription of medications and surgery is found in 80% of scenarios. Missing information regarding long-term coronary complications, antiplatelet management and cardiac assessments is found in all 10 scenarios. Mean readability of parent-targeted responses is 71.70 ± 6.26, a readability level easily understood by 12-year-olds. For paediatrician-targeted responses, ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest scores in ‘relevance’ (median 9.50, IQR 7.25 to 9.0). Inaccurate information regarding coronary interventions, patient education and immunization recommendations is spotted in 37.5% of the scenarios. Missing information regarding patient education and stress imaging is found in 25% of the scenarios. All reviewers would adopt ChatGPT-4’s advice in 87.5% of the scenarios. Conclusions ChatGPT-4 has significant limitations in accuracy and lacks salient information when providing KD recommendations for parents and paediatric trainees.Performance in parent-targeted questionsPerformance in trainee-targeted question

Safety and Tolerability of Nintedanib in Patients with Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Post-marketing Data.

Nintedanib is approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other forms of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). We present global post-marketing safety data for nintedanib in these fibrosing ILDs. Data on adverse events in patients with fibrosing ILDs who were treated with nintedanib were collected via spontaneous reporting and solicited reporting in various studies (excluding clinical trials).Data were collected from 15 October 2014 (first regulatory approval) to 15 October 2023. Adverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities. Cumulative exposure to nintedanib was estimated using sales data. Cumulative exposure to nintedanib was 380,557 patient-years. Diarrhoea was reported at a rate of 227.5 per 1000 patient-years. Only 2.6% of diarrhoea events were reported as serious. Of 39,788 (33.6%) diarrhoea events with a known time to onset, almost 60% occurred within the first 3months of treatment. The rate of serious liver enzyme and bilirubin elevations (including drug-induced liver injury) was 4.0 per 1000 patient-years. Bleeding was reported at a rate of 24.2 per 1000 patient-years. Most (81.3%) bleeding events were non-serious. The rates of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism were 3.3, 3.3, and 2.0 per 1000 patient-years, respectively. Gastrointestinal perforation was reported at a rate of 0.9 per 1000 patient-years. Post-marketing safety data on established and potential adverse events associated with nintedanib in patients with fibrosing ILDs, collected over 9years, demonstrated a safety profile that was similar to that established in clinical trials and provided in the product labels. Education of patients about the adverse events that may be associated with nintedanib, and the effective management of adverse events when they occur, is important to minimise the impact of adverse events and help patients remain on treatment.

Development of a systematic referral model to primary care health interventions for patients with atrial fibrillation. a delphi study

Abstract Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) recommend integrated care in AF, combining medical treatment with lifestyle modifications and psychosocial management in a multi-disciplinary set-up. Research show that patients with AF can benefit from lifestyle interventions and psychosocial management, like patient education. According to World Health Organization recommendations, these health interventions are moving from hospitals to primary healthcare settings. Therefore, patients with AF should be systematically referred to these interventions. Yet, an evidence-based referral model that can support this transition is lacking. Purpose The purpose is to develop a systematic referral model for primary care health interventions for patients with AF. Methods We used the Delphi-technique with three rounds of questionnaires (figure 1). International and national clinical experts in AF across disciplines and health sectors were invited to participate. In the first round, the expert panel evaluated items that could be part of a referral model on relevance, improvability and self-reporting. In the second round, the expert panel evaluated each item as either an inclusion or exclusion criteria, important knowledge to have, or not relevant. In the third round, the expert panel evaluated the items according to data source and outcome status. A final model was drawn based on items reaching consensus. The study was reported according to the guidance on conducting and reporting Delphi studies (CREDES). Results In total, 69 of 139 invited experts accepted to participate (50%). These were mostly academics or clinicians (90%), stemming from primary sector (16%), secondary sector (35%) and research (32%). Most were medical doctors (36%) and nurses (35%). However physiotherapist, psychologists, dieticians, and other disciplines along with six patients with AF were also represented. The expert panel (60% females) had a mean age of 50 years, and 65% were from Denmark. For the final referral model (figure 2), AF symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life, anxiety and poor medicine compliance combined with a risk factor profile were the main inclusion criteria. Furthermore, it was important to know about the patients’ mental well-being, self-management abilities and comorbidities. Conclusion Consensus was reached for a generic referral model, which can be further adjusted in the appropriate clinical context. The model includes inclusion criteria which closely correlate with guidelines for AF management focusing on reducing the patients’ symptom and risk factor burden. The referral model is expected to increase the number of patients with AF referred to primary care health interventions, which could lead to better quality of life, fewer hospital admissions and lowered health care costs in AF.

Making Conscientious Decisions: Engaging in Venous Leg Ulcer Self-Management Following Nurse-Led Patient Education.

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) provoke multiple symptoms and impact individuals and society as a whole. Their treatment and prevention strategies require individual's involvement in self-management strategies. Insufficient knowledge with regard to prevention, management, and treatment has been identified as a critical factor related to VLUs and their recurrence. Therapeutic patient education (TPE) proposed as part of a management strategy for this population provides unclear benefits regarding wounds healing or prevention of recurrence. The aim of the study was to develop a theory explaining how individuals with a VLU experience an individualized nurse-led TPE program regarding self-management strategies. The constructivist approach of Charmaz to the grounded theory method was used to develop the theory. A total of 26 individuals contributed to the co-construction of the theory through face-to-face or telephone semi-structured interviews. Data analysis and data collection occurs simultaneously with a comparative process to reveal the conceptual categories, apply theoretical sampling, and define theoretical saturation. The theory of "Conscientiously Engaging in Self-Management" was co-constructed with the participants encapsulating four categories: "Being influenced by my own story," "Being personally informed," "Making conscientious decisions to engage in self-adapted management strategies," and "Integrating a conscientious way of living." This theory highlights individuals' voices and stories toward their journey of VLU self-management taking contextual factors into consideration. This new theory offers new knowledge about implementation of self-management strategies for individuals living with a VLU and will inform clinical practice and contribute to the development of targeted interventions.

Utilization patterns and preferences of telemedicine services in the post-Covid-19 era in Israel

Abstract Background While telemedicine can streamline healthcare delivery, suboptimal use may compromise care quality and access. Given the increased adoption of these services during and after the Covid-19 pandemic, understanding best practices through examination of utilization patterns and patient preferences is crucial. This study estimated utilization rates, patient preferences and perceptions of response received for different physician-encounter channels for common clinical and administrative scenarios. Methods Cross-sectional telephone survey in Hebrew or Arabic of 519 Israelis who contacted a doctor in the past year for clinical or administrative needs. Data collected during April-June 2023, focused on chosen contact channel, reasons for choice, perceived response adequacy, and hypothetical future preferences. Findings 78% of encounters with family physician for clinical need were in-person, with lower rates for phone (16%) or messaging (6%); in-person dominated with encounters with specialists (94%). Conversely, for administrative needs, more used phone (15%) or messaging (48%), though 37% still preferred in-person encounter. Video usage was negligible (&amp;lt;1%). Main reasons for in-person choice were perceived need for physical exam, habit, or negative perception of remote service quality. Convenience/exam-free needs drove phone/messaging use. While most patients were satisfied with their chosen channels, phone consultations had lower future preference rates. Conclusions Matching channel to need is crucial. Physical exams require in-person visits, though they are not always required and many stick with in-person out of habit; remote options like messaging can streamline administrative tasks. Patient education could address habits and help familiarize patients with new options. Optimizing phone visits and promoting video options could enhance adoption due to their benefits. Key messages • In-person visits are preferred for clinical needs, while messaging/phone are underutilized for administrative tasks, highlighting missed opportunities for convenient telemedicine options. • Addressing patient habits and perceptions around remote healthcare channels is crucial for optimizing telemedicine adoption and streamlining care delivery.

Right-Siting Care and Decongesting Specialist Outpatient Clinics - A Singapore Case Study

Abstract Issue Globally, Specialist Outpatient Clinics (SOCs) face a growing burden due to rising chronic diseases. This strain on resources leads to long appointment wait times (LAWTs), delaying diagnoses and treatments. This is particularly of concern in countries with rapidly ageing populations such as Singapore. Description The Right-Site Care Program is a healthcare transformation initiative implemented by individual healthcare clusters within Singapore to improve access to timely SOC care by directing patients to the most appropriate care level (right-siting). This transitions stable chronic disease patients to primary care providers (PCPs) for ongoing management. A standardised approach utilises evidence-based guidelines for patient selection, followed by identification and transfer of suitable patients to PCPs. This multi-center program offers a real-world example of healthcare system optimisation for chronic disease management. Results A multi-source data analysis, including program reports and peer-reviewed studies from participating healthcare clusters, was conducted to evaluate program impact. The analysis focused on LAWTs, patient outcomes and implementation challenges. Right-siting yielded mixed results across various conditions. Right-sited patients had better survival rates, likely due to closer monitoring and management of chronic conditions with higher total outpatient attendance frequencies. (1) Improvements were particularly significant for diabetes mellitus patients who successfully transitioned to PCPs. (2) However, challenges such as patient scepticism about PCP competence and a preference for specialist care have been identified. (3) Lessons learned Right-siting care can improve patient outcomes for certain chronic diseases. The program’s impact varied across different chronic diseases, highlighting the need for tailored strategies. Educational interventions addressing patient concerns can facilitate smoother patient transitions and program success. Key messages • Right-siting care shows promise, with improved patient outcomes for conditions like diabetes mellitus. • Patient education is crucial to overcome patient scepticism and preference for specialists.

Atrial fibrillation, prevention and rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting. A feasibility study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) often influences daily life with symptoms like palpitations, dyspnoea, fatigue, fear and anxiety. Research show that patients with AF benefit from prevention and rehabilitation interventions. However, evidence is scarce and mainly hospital-based, and it is unknown whether the transition to the primary healthcare sector gives the same positive results. In 2019, a Danish primary care Health Center and the cardiology department at the local hospital completed a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of delivering a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF in a primary care Health Center. Methods This study was a mixed-methods, non-randomized, intervention, feasibility study. A convergent mixed-methods design was used, and results were illustrated in side-by-side joint displays. Patients were included at a Hospital AF clinic referring to the Health Center. The prevention and rehabilitation intervention consisted of risk factor management, patient education, physical activity and yoga. Two patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were used, the HeartQoL measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) measuring symptoms of anxiety and depression. Data were collected at baseline (T0), at end of intervention (T1), and at two-months follow-up (T2) and analysed descriptively. Focus group interviews were analysed thematically and covered experiences of participating, needs and preferences, outcomes and feasibility of collecting PROMs. The reporting was guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension to pilot and feasibility trials. Results 43 patients (53% women; median age 66 (range 52-81) years) completed the intervention. Table 1 shows that HRQoL increased, and symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased. These results maintained at follow-up. Figure 1 shows the qualitative themes. Patients experienced being understood and supported by health professionals and peers. They thought it difficult to know what their needs were. However, some patients had specific preferences for interventions. For changes in outcomes, the patients identified that gaining tools and knowledge about the disease from the interventions helped. It was feasible to collect PROMs during the intervention and finally, the patients had an attention to what comes next, when finishing the intervention in the primary care setting. Conclusion It was feasible to deliver a multidimensional prevention and rehabilitation intervention for patients with AF at a primary care Health Center. HRQoL increased and symptoms of anxiety and depression decreased. The patients experienced being supported and gaining tools and knowledge to handle AF. Future large randomized controlled trials must confirm these results.

Using PPI and UDL principles to design a gastrointestinal endoscopy patient information video series

Abstract Introduction Patients undergoing GI endoscopy often experience anxiety and due to limited health literacy. Traditional paper-based information leaflets are often not sufficient to accommodate for the diverse way in which people consume information. Public and patient involvement (PPI) and universal design for learning are two well-described pedagogical principles. We wanted to use these principles to design more effective patient education materials. Objectives Given the heterogeneity of resources available to patients, the authors wanted to develop a high-quality and trustable video resources for patients that would be available on our hospital website. These videos would be co-designed by patients and ancillary staff, through the formation of a key stakeholder panel. Results Using PPI principles, we were able to improve the relevance and quality of our content, through the use of storyboards and the expertise of the stakeholder panel. Through the three key UDL principles of multiple means of representation, engagement and action and expression, we were able to ensure that our videos were accessible and appropriate for all of our patients. Initial feedback from stakeholders and patients provided valuable insights, prompting necessary adjustments for accuracy and patient understanding. This comprehensive approach underscores the commitment to enhancing healthcare delivery. Our project is the first guide in combining both pedagogical principles in the development of patient information and education materials. Conclusions The meticulous steps taken, from stakeholder engagement to video production, reflect a commitment to inclusivity and patient-centred care. Ongoing evaluation and feedback mechanisms ensure continuous improvement, contributing to the overall success and sustainability of the digital service. Key messages • This is the first research/patient education piece designed using both PPI and UDL principles. • The importance of patient-centred educational design is key to improving health literacy and education in our patients.

"The medicine is not something that interests me at all." Beliefs, health-related behaviors, and medication adherence in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

Abstract Background Despite evidence-based guidelines recommending secondary prevention with antithrombotics and lipid-lowering therapies, adherence to optimal pharmacological therapies remains suboptimal in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD), potentially contributing to excess morbidity and mortality. However, the behavioral factors and health beliefs underlying this behavior are still poorly understood. Purpose To explore the health-related behaviors and beliefs of patients with symptomatic PAD regarding secondary preventive therapy. Methods Using a qualitative design, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with symptomatic PAD. Participants were recruited from four departments of vascular surgery in Denmark from December 2022 to January 2024. Data analysis was performed using framework analysis based on the six domains of the Health Belief Models1 (HBM) as analytical framework: perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The HBM is widely used for conceptualizing individual’s attitudes and beliefs to explain and predict health behaviours. Results Sixteen patients participated in the study: seven adherent and nine non-adherent patients. Based on the HBM components, the following findings emerged (Figure 1). Patients expressed low perceived awareness of the severity of PAD and its potential consequences, not recognizing PAD as a systemic condition associated with broader cardiovascular risk. The perception of PAD centered around the experience of excruciating leg pain and its impact on everyday life. This focus on symptoms affected the perceived benefits of secondary preventive therapies. Patients lacked knowledge about the importance and goal of treatment and did not link the secondary preventive therapy to PAD, often associating it only with other cardiovascular diseases. Barriers included inadequate understanding of the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its severity, experience and fear of side-effects, prescription confusion, pill burden, financial constraints, and allergies. Fear of recurring pain, complications, and early death served as strong internal adherence triggers. Paradoxically, despite expressing fear, some patients were only adherent to antithrombotic therapy, not assigning the same importance to statins. Other cues to action included practical arrangements as well as establishing a trusting patient-provider relationship and receiving comprehensive and logical explanations. Conclusions This study provided new perspectives on the multifaceted challenges hindering adherence to secondary preventive therapy among patients with symptomatic PAD. Notably, the insufficient knowledge regarding the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its cardiovascular implications, underscores the need for enhanced patient education and tailored interventions to ensure optimal secondary preventive therapy.Figure 1

Pharmacist care for hypertension management among patients with diabetes: a systematic review

Abstract Background Improving blood pressure (BP) control is of major importance among patients with diabetes, due to their high risk of micro- and macrovascular complications. Community-based models of care with the involvement of pharmacists and other nonphysician healthcare providers can help manage hypertension. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions, alone or in collaboration, on BP among outpatients with diabetes and hypertension. Methods We conducted systematic searches of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of pharmacist interventions on BP among outpatients with hypertension and diabetes compared to usual care. The outcome was the systolic and diastolic BP change or BP control. We performed a meta-analysis with random effects models and results are presented by mean difference along with relative 95% CI.We will perform subgroup analyses for the types and intensity (duration, frequeny) of pharmacist interventions, patients’ characteristics, and healthcare settings. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021279751) and published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal. Results Out of 2048 study records identified by electronic database searching, we included 9 studies, with 5067 participants, published between 2008 and 2022. These studies were conducted mainly in North America (n = 5; other regions: n = 4). The intervention was led by the pharmacist in 78% of the studies and in collaboration with other healthcare providers in 22%. Pharmacist intervention included patient education in 67%, healthcare providers education in 11% of studies and feedback to healthcare providers in 44% of the studies. Systolic and diastolic BP were reduced after pharmacist intervention by -5.6 mmHg (95% CI: -10.6 to -0.6) and -4.1 mmHg (95% CI: -7.1 to -1.2) respectively. Additional analyses will be presented at the congress. Conclusions Pharmacist interventions improve blood pressure control in hypertensive diabetic outpatients. Key messages • Recent hypertension guidelines recommend pharmacist involvement in hypertension care management. • This systematic review provide updated evidence on the effect of pharmacist interventions on hypertension management of patients with diabetes.

Home-Based Connected Devices Combined With Statistical Process Control for the Early Detection of Respiratory Exacerbations by Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: Pilot Interventional Study With a Pre-Post Design.

Currently, patients with cystic fibrosis do not routinely monitor their respiratory function at home. This study aims to assess the clinical validity of using different connected health devices at home to measure 5 physiological parameters to help prevent exacerbations on a personalized basis from the perspective of patient empowerment. A multicenter interventional pilot study including 36 patients was conducted. Statistical process control-the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM)-was used with connected health device measures with the objective of sending patients alerts at a relevant time in order to identify their individual risk of exacerbations. Associated patient education was delivered. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. One-half (18/36) of the patients completed the protocol through the end of the study. During the 12-month intervention, 6162 measures were collected with connected health devices, 387 alerts were sent, and 33 exacerbations were reported. The precision of alerts to detect exacerbations was weak for all parameters, which may be partly related to the low compliance of patients with the measurements. However, a decrease in the median number of exacerbations from 12 months before the study to after the 12-month intervention was observed for patients. The use of connected health devices associated with statistical process control showed that it was not acceptable for all patients, especially because of the burden related to measurements. However, the results suggest that it may be promising, after adaptations, for early identification and better management of exacerbations. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03304028; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03304028.

A Process Evaluation in a Randomized Controlled Trial among Adults with Acetabular Dysplasia

Abstract Introduction The 2021 framework from the UK’s Medical Research Council defines evaluation as a theory-driven approach to examine how well an intervention works. However, the application of these guidelines can be challenging. Therefore, using a process evaluation case study on an exercise and patient education intervention for adults with acetabular dysplasia, we reflect on which specific aspects were relevant for the evaluation of the intervention and why. We focus on detailing methods to assess implementation (process, dose, reach), acceptability, mechanisms of change, and the impact of contextual factors. Methods Two hundred trial participants aged 18-50 years will be recruited from a University Hospital in Denmark and randomised to intervention and control groups. The process evaluation adopts a concurrent mixed-methods design involving self-report questionnaires at baseline and 6-month follow-up, training records and semi-structured focus groups with intervention providers (n = 10) and healthcare managers (n = 4-6). The mechanisms of change will be explored through semi-structured one-to-one interviews (at baseline and 6-month follow-up) with 15-20 purposefully sampled trial participants, and additionally, through exploratory examinations of associations between dose and change in health outcomes at 6-month follow-up), via simple linear regression models. The acceptability and contextual factors will be explored through one-to-one participant interviews, plus focus groups with 4-6 healthcare managers. Thematic analyses of the interviews will focus on expectations, experiences, events, personal understandings and interpersonal and organisational interactions. Conclusions The presentation will explore how the operational aspects of the intervention can be assessed through a process evaluation and how these findings may improve and expand any future implementation efforts.

Incidence and factors associated with mitral valve reoperation in patients undergoing intervention for mitral regurgitation: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background When intervention is needed for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, the risk of reoperation is of concern for both patients and physicians. As such, contemporary and nationwide data on the incidence and factors associated with mitral reoperation can provide crucial information to support patient education and clinical follow-up after intervention. Purpose To examine the incidence of mitral reoperation in patients operated for mitral regurgitation. Second, to assess whether reoperation rates differed according to time since surgery and identify potential factors associated with reoperation. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, patients undergoing first-time surgery for mitral regurgitation 1996–2021 were identified. Exclusion included first-time surgery due to endocarditis. According to index surgery, the population was categorized into 1) mitral repair; 2) mechanical prosthesis; 3) bioprosthesis. Patients were followed from date of discharge. Cumulative incidence of reoperation was examined using competing risk analysis during a maximum of 20-years follow-up. Crude incidence rates of reoperation were reported from 0-6 months and for overall study period. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to examine factors associated with reoperation. Results We identified 7,063 patients: 4,680 (66.3%) with repair (72% male, median age 66), 1,273 (18.0%) with mechanical prosthesis (52% male, median age 59), and 1,110 (15.7%) with bioprosthesis (57% male, median age 74). Median follow-up was 7.2 years, 10.7 years, and 4.5 years, respectively. At end of follow-up, cumulative incidences were 7.7% for repair, 6.8% for mechanical prostheses, and 7.5% for bioprostheses. Of these, reoperation was preceded by endocarditis in 8.0%, 21.5%, and 30.4% of the respective patient groups. The cumulative incidence function demonstrates that the highest proportion of reoperations occurred within first six months, Figure 1. From 0-6 months following surgery, incidence rates per 100 person-years were 9.1 for repair, 11.7 for mechanical prostheses, and 18.4 for bioprostheses, while this was 8.6, 9.4, and 17.0, respectively for the overall study period. Factors associated with increased rate of reoperation were heart failure (HR=1.80, 95% CI 1.40-2.32), chronic renal failure (HR=1.48, 95% CI 1.11-1.98) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) (HR=1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), Figure 2. Compared to mitral repair, mechanical prostheses were associated with lower rate of reoperation (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.78), while there was no statistically significant difference between repair and bioprostheses (HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.81-1.50). Conclusion In patients operated for mitral regurgitation, cumulative incidences of reoperation with a maximum of 20-year follow-up were 7.7% for repair, 6.8% for mechanical prostheses, and 7.5% for bioprostheses. Comorbidities such as heart failure, renal failure and COPD were associated with increased risk of reoperation.Figure 1Figure 2

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Increase the Readability of Patient Education Materials in Pediatric Otolaryngology.

Objectives: To identify the reading levels of existing patient education materials in pediatric otolaryngology and to utilize natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) to reduce the reading level of patient education materials. Methods: Patient education materials for pediatric conditions were identified from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) website. Patient education materials about the same conditions, if available, were identified and selected from the websites of 7 children's hospitals. The readability of the patient materials was scored before and after using AI with the Flesch-Kincaid calculator. ChatGPT version 3.5 was used to convert the materials to a fifth-grade reading level. Results: On average, AAO-HNS pediatric education material was written at a 10.71 ± 0.71 grade level. After requesting the reduction of those materials to a fifth-grade reading level, ChatGPT converted the same materials to an average grade level of 7.9 ± 1.18 (P < .01). When comparing the published materials from AAO-HNS and the 7 institutions, the average grade level was 9.32 ± 1.82, and ChatGPT was able to reduce the average level to 7.68 ± 1.12 (P = .0598). Of the 7 children's hospitals, only 1 institution had an average grade level below the recommended sixth-grade level. Conclusions: Patient education materials in pediatric otolaryngology were consistently above recommended reading levels. In its current state, AI can reduce the reading levels of education materials. However, it did not possess the capability to reduce all materials to be below the recommended reading level.