Edoxaban For Stroke Prevention Research Articles

Oral anticoagulation with Edoxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: Analysis of 1-year follow-up data of routine clinical practice in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH) from the ETNA-AF registry

Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the safety and efficacy of Edoxaban in routine care in Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DACH) are limited. We report one-year outcomes in patients with AF treated with Edoxaban in routine care. The ETNA-AF-Europe study (Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02 944 019) is a multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled 13 092 patients with AF treated with Edoxaban from 852 sites across 10 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). The DACH-cohort consists of 5457 (41,7 %) patients of sites in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Patients had a mean age of 74 years (2384 [44 %]women) and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc-score of 3.2 ± 1.4. A label-conform dosing of Edoxaban was administered to 4309 patients (78,9 %). At the one-year-follow-up a stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 42 patients (0,8 %/year), and severe bleeding was reported in 36 patients (0,7 %/year). Ten patients (0,2 %/year) suffered intracranial and 13 patients (0,3 %/year)gastrointestinal bleeding. Numbers of death from all causes and cardiovascular death occurred in 179 patients (3,4 %/year) and 85 patients (1,6 %/year), respectively. Age > 75 years, frailty and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 4 were associated with a higher all-cause mortality - and those patients were more likely to suffer a stroke or a major bleeding event. In Germany, Austria and Switzerland in patients with AF on Edoxaban therapy for stroke prevention the number of stroke and major bleeding events is low. Increasing morbidity is associated with a higher number of important clinical events.

Edoxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and factors associated with dosing: patient characteristics from the prospective observational ETNA-AF-China registry

Real-world data on effectiveness and safety of a single non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in the Chinese population with atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. This study reports characteristics of patients treated with edoxaban and factors associated with dosing patterns from routine care in China. ETNA-AF-China (NCT04747496) is a multicentre, prospective, observational study enrolling edoxaban-treated patients from four economic regions with a targeted 2-year follow-up. Of the 4930 patients with AF (mean age: 70.2 ± 9.5 years; male, 57.1%), the mean creatinine clearance (CrCl), CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores were 71.2 mL/min, 2.9, and 1.6. Overall, 6.4% of patients were perceived as frail by investigators. Available label dose reduction criteria (N = 4232) revealed that 3278 (77.5%) patients received recommended doses and 954 (22.5%) non-recommended doses. Northeast (53.0%) and West (43.1%) regions had the highest prescriptions of 60 mg and 30 mg recommended doses, respectively. Non-recommended 30 mg doses were more frequently prescribed in patients with antiplatelet use and history of heart failure than recommended 60 mg. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age as the strongest associated factor with non-recommended doses. Frailty had the strongest association with 30 mg except for age, and history of TIA was the most relevant factor associated with 60 mg. In conclusion, patients in the ETNA-AF-China study were predominantly aged 65 years and older, had mild-to-moderate renal impairment and good label adherence. Advanced age was associated with non-recommended doses, with frailty most common for non-recommended 30 mg and a history of TIA for the non-recommended 60 mg dose.

Effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in 27,333 patients from ETNA-AF with and without a history of intracranial haemorrhage after 2 years of treatment

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was sponsored by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by Atreju Lackey, PhD of AlphaBioCom, LLC, and funded by Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Background/Introduction Once-daily edoxaban significantly reduced the risk of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) compared with well-managed warfarin in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in patients with prior ICH is unknown. Purpose To compare the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in AF patients with or without a history of ICH. Methods The Global ETNA-AF programme is composed of and, thus, integrates data from multiple prospective, observational, and noninterventional regional studies collecting data of AF patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention. This snapshot analysis presents global and regional baseline characteristics with medical history and 2-year annualised rates of all-cause mortality, stroke (haemorrhagic, ischaemic, any), and bleeding (major bleeding [MB] including ICH, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding [CRNMB], any bleeding), in patients with or without ICH history. Results Overall, 27,333 patients from Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan were analysed, including 367 with prior ICH and 26,966 without prior ICH. There were proportionally fewer patients with a history of ICH in the European population. Patients with a history of ICH were older (P=0.006), had a lower body mass index (P<0.0001), had a lower creatinine clearance (P=0.0001), and had more comorbidities, with a higher percentage of patients with a history of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), or MB (Table 1); the higher level of comorbidities noted in patients with a history of ICH was also reflected by higher baseline CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores (Table 1). Patients with a history of ICH were more likely receiving 30 mg edoxaban at baseline, whereas patients without ICH history were more often on 60 mg edoxaban (each P<0.0001). In patients with vs without ICH history, all-cause mortality (5.10% vs 3.14%; P=0.01), ischaemic stroke (1.79% vs 0.73%; P=0.006), and any stroke rates (3.25% vs 0.95%; P<0.0001) were higher (Table 2). Patients with vs without ICH history had higher annualised rates of MB (2.50% vs 1.00%; P=0.001), ICH (1.42% vs 0.27%; P<0.0001), haemorrhagic stroke (1.42% vs 0.20%; P<0.0001), CRNMB (2.49% vs 1.40%; P=0.04), and any bleeding (7.57% vs 4.27%; P=0.001), but these rates were low compared to other high-risk populations. ICH was not selected as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes on multivariate prediction modelling. ICH had non-significant effects in predicting all-cause death (HR 1.22), ischemic stroke (HR 1.14), and major bleeding (HF 1.37) and repeat ICH (HR 1.94). Conclusions Patients with a history of ICH are a small, elderly, multimorbid subgroup of patients with AF. Treatment with the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant edoxaban resulted in relatively low rates of major events.

Rationale design and efficacy of a smartphone application for improving self-awareness of adherence to edoxaban treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (adhere app)

IntroductionHigh adherence to oral anticoagulants is essential for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We developed a smartphone application (app) that pushes alarms for taking medication and measuring...

Annualized clinical event rates during two-year follow-up are low in 27,617 atrial fibrillation patients on edoxaban: results from the global noninterventional ETNA-AF program

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Background and Purpose The large global Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice (ETNA)-AF program was designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban, complementing randomized clinical trials. Methods ETNA collects data on patient characteristics and clinical events in unselected AF patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention, integrating data from prospective, noninterventional studies conducted in Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Results The 2-year follow-up analysis included 27,617 patients, the majority of whom (82.6%) received the recommended dose according to the local label. At baseline, the mean age was 73.6 ± 9.8 years and 58.1% were male. Half of the patients (50.5%) were 75 years or older. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.3 ± 1.5, and the modified HAS-BLED score was 2.4 ± 1.1. The rate of ischemic stroke was 0.74%/yr, major bleeding 1.02%/yr, intracranial hemorrhage 0.29%/yr, and major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding 0.51%/yr. All-cause mortality was 3.13%/yr, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality 1.45%/yr (see Table). Conclusion The rates of ischemic stroke and major bleeding events remained low globally and across regions during the two-year follow-up period in AF patients treated with edoxaban. Global(N = 27,617) Japan(N = 11,330) Korea/Taiwan(N = 2,870) Europe(N = 13,417) Age, mean (SD) 73.6 (9.8) 74.2 (10.1) 71.6 (9.5) 73.6 (9.5) Gender, male, % 58.1 59.4 60.2 56.6 Weight [kg], median (IQR) 69 (58, 81) 59 (51, 68) 65 (57, 73) 80 (70, 90) CrCL [mL/min], mean (SD) 68.7 (28.4) 63.9 (25.8) 63.4 (23.7) 74.4 (30.5) CHA2DS2-VASc, mean (SD) 3.3 (1.5) 3.5 (1.7) 3.1 (1.4) 3.2 (1.4) Mod. HAS-BLED≠, mean (SD) 2.4 (1.1) 2.4 (1.1) 2.3 (1.1) 2.5 (1.1) Edoxaban 60mg/30mg, % 53.5 / 46.5 27.6 / 72.4 48.8 / 51.2 76.4 / 23.6 2-year clinical events, N (%/year), [95% CI] Major Bleeding (ISTH) 477 (1.02) [0.93; 1.11] 188 (1.09) [0.94; 1.25] 51 (1.00) [0.74; 1.31] 238 (0.97) [0.85; 1.11] Intracranial Hemorrhage 135 (0.29) [0.24; 0.34] 68 (0.39) [0.30; 0.50] 17 (0.33) [0.19; 0.53] 50 (0.20) [0.15; 0.27] Major GI Bleeding 241 (0.51) [0.45; 0.58] 122 (0.70) [0.58; 0.84] 18 (0.35) [0.21; 0.55] 101 (0.41) [0.33; 0.50] Any Stroke 455 (0.97) [0.88; 1.06] 244 (1.41) [1.24; 1.60] 54 (1.06) [0.80; 1.38] 157 (0.64) [0.54; 0.75] Ischemic Stroke 347 (0.74) [0.66; 0.82] 179 (1.03) [0.89; 1.20] 43 (0.84) [0.61; 1.13] 125 (0.51) [0.42; 0.61] Hemorrhagic Stroke 99 (0.21) [0.17; 0.26] 67 (0.39) [0.30; 0.49] 9 (0.17) [0.08; 0.33] 23 (0.09) [0.06; 0.14] All-cause Death 1479 (3.13) [2.98; 3.30] 470 (2.70) [2.46; 2.96] 72 (1.40) [1.09; 1.76] 937 (3.80) [3.56; 4.05] CV Death 684 (1.45) [1.34; 1.56] 140 (0.80) [0.68; 0.95] 26 (0.50) [0.33; 0.74] 518 (2.10) [1.92; 2.29] ≠Excluding labile INR.

Safety and Effectiveness of Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients in Routine Clinical Practice: One-Year Follow-Up from the Global Noninterventional ETNA-AF Program.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants such as edoxaban are the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The Global Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice (ETNA)-AF program integrates prospective, observational, noninterventional regional studies from Europe, Japan, and other Asian countries, collecting data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in unselected patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention in AF. Overall, 26,823 patients completed a 1-year follow-up and were treated with edoxaban; either 60 or 30 mg once daily. The majority (82.6%) of patients received the recommended doses according to the local label. At baseline, the median (interquartile range) age was 75 (68, 80) years, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.0 (2.0, 4.0), and the hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs, or alcohol (HAS-BLED) score was 2.0 (2.0, 3.0). At one year, there were 273 (1.12%/year) major bleeding events, including 75 (0.31%/year) intracranial hemorrhages and 140 (0.57%/year) major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds. There were 214 ischemic strokes (0.87%/year). Mortality was 3.03%/year (745 deaths), and cardiovascular mortality accounted for 40% of all deaths (1.22%/year, 299 cardiovascular deaths). In conclusion, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and other major bleeding events were low in patients with AF treated with edoxaban in routine care. Even on anticoagulation, cardiovascular death remained common.

Periprocedural edoxaban interruption is associated with low bleeding and thromboembolic risk: the Italian data of the EMIT-AF/VTE study

So far, the only available data for edoxaban periprocedural management come from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. The recently published EMIT-AF/VTE study showed low periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic risks of edoxaban in a real-world setting in patients undergoing any diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. The aim of this study was to compare descriptively Italian and European data with regard to patient characteristics and outcomes in the EMIT-AF/VTE study. A total of 1155 patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and with venous thromboembolism, and undergoing a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were enrolled in 326 centers across Europe. Of these patients, 246 were from 43 Italian centers. The periprocedural interruption of edoxaban was at the physician's discretion. All the procedures were classified into minor, low, and high bleeding procedural risk according to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) definition. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included thromboembolic events. Patients were older in Italy in comparison with the rest of Europe with a mean age of 74.2 vs 71.3 years. Also, the rate of comorbidities was higher in Italy (e.g. diagnosed cancer and vascular disease) than in Europe. In Italy, there was a higher rate of high bleeding risk procedures than in other European countries (37.8% vs 20.6%) and a more homogeneous distribution of all types of procedures (while in Europe 44.1% were vascular access and transcatheter diagnostic procedures and interventions). In Italy, a higher proportion of patients did not interrupt edoxaban (32.9% vs 29% in Europe). The number of major bleeding events (2 in Italy, 3 in Europe) as well as of thromboembolic events (4 in Italy, 3 in Europe) was overall low. In the EMIT-AF/VTE study, the number of bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients treated with edoxaban undergoing elective or unplanned procedures was low either in Italy or in the rest of Europe. The safety and efficacy of edoxaban was confirmed in Italy even if patients were older, presented more frequently with cancer, and there was a higher rate of high bleeding risk procedures by EHRA definition.

Edoxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in routine clinical care: 1-year follow-up of the prospective observational ETNA-AF-Europe study.

AimsNon-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are safe and effective for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on the safety and efficacy of edoxaban in routine care are limited in Europe. We report 1-year outcomes in patients with AF treated with edoxaban in routine care.Methods and resultsETNA-AF-Europe is a prospective, multicentre, post-authorization, observational study enrolling patients treated with edoxaban in 10 European countries, the design of which was agreed with the European Medicines Agency as part of edoxaban’s post-approval safety plan. Altogether 13 092 patients in 852 sites completed the 1-year follow-up [mean age: 73.6 ± 9.5 years; 57% male, mean follow-up: 352 ± 49 days (median: 366 days)]. Most patients had associated comorbidities (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 3.1 ± 1.4). Stroke or systemic embolism was reported in 103 patients (annualized event rate: 0.82%/year), and major bleeding events were reported in 132 patients (1.05%/year). Rates of intracranial haemorrhage were low [30 patients (0.24%/year)]. Death occurred in 442 patients (3.50%/year); cardiovascular (CV) death occurred in 206 patients (1.63%/year). The approved dosing of edoxaban was chosen in 83%. All-cause and CV mortality were higher in patients receiving edoxaban 30 mg vs. 60 mg, in line with the higher age and more frequent comorbidities of the 30 mg group. Major bleeding was also numerically more common in patients receiving edoxaban 30 mg vs. 60 mg.ConclusionThe rates of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding are low in this large unselected cohort of high-risk AF patients routinely treated with edoxaban.

Routine clinical practice in the periprocedural management of edoxaban therapy is associated with low risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications: The prospective, observational, and multinational EMIT-AF/VTE study.

BackgroundGuidance for periprocedural anticoagulant management is mainly based on limited data from Phase III or observational studies and expert opinion.HypothesisEMIT‐AF/VTE was designed to document the risks of bleeding and thromboembolic events in more than 1000 patients on edoxaban undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in clinical practice.MethodsRoutine care in a multinational multicenter, prospective observational study. Participants were adult patients with atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention or for secondary prevention in venous thromboembolic disease, undergoing a wide range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Edoxaban therapy was interrupted periprocedurally at the treating physician's discretion. Patients were evaluated from 5 days pre‐ until 30 days postprocedure. Primary outcome was the incidence of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis defined major bleeding; secondary outcomes included incidence of clinically relevant non‐major bleeding, acute coronary syndrome, and acute thromboembolic events.ResultsOutcomes and management are reported for the first procedures in 1155 unselected patients. Five cases of major bleeding (0.4%) and eight of clinically relevant non‐major bleeding (0.7%) were documented, five (38%) of which occurred outside the period of likely edoxaban effect (last edoxaban dose ≥3 days prior to bleeding). Five (0.4%) deaths from any cause, seven acute thromboembolic events (0.6%) including two cardiac deaths (0.2%) in six patients, and one acute coronary event (0.1%) occurred.ConclusionsThe periprocedural bleeding and acute thromboembolic event risks for patients treated with edoxaban were low. This can help inform both clinical routine and guidelines for the periprocedural management of edoxaban.

Effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation: data from the Danish Nationwide Cohort.

Edoxaban treatment for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) has mainly been investigated in randomized controlled trials, and data reflecting clinical practice are limited. We ascertained the clinical effectiveness and safety of edoxaban 30 and 60 mg once daily among Danish patients with AF. This was an observational study based on Danish nationwide registries collecting information for administrative purposes. From June 2016 through November 2018, we identified 3405 patients initiating edoxaban. After exclusions, 2285 AF patients were followed for the effectiveness outcome of thromboembolism (ischaemic stroke and/or systemic embolism) and bleeding outcomes (composite of major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial haemorrhage), as well as bleeding requiring hospitalization. Population mean age was 75 years and 43% were female; 643 patients received the 30 mg edoxaban dosage regimen and 1642 initiated 60 mg edoxaban. During follow-up, we observed 41 thromboembolic events and 89 bleeding events of which 40 events required hospitalization. Among patients with 30 mg edoxaban, the rate (per 100 person-years) of thromboembolism was 2.07 vs. 1.62 for 60 mg edoxaban. Rates of bleeding were similar for the two dosages at ∼3.85. Bleeding requiring hospitalization occurred at a rate of 1.74 for 30 mg edoxaban and 1.69 with 60 mg edoxaban. In this nationwide cohort of Caucasian AF patients treated with edoxaban for stroke prevention, the clinical effectiveness and safety were in line with data from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Studies investigating comparative effectiveness and safety for edoxaban in comparison with other choices of antithrombotic treatment options are needed.

Edoxaban: A direct oral anticoagulant.

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of edoxaban for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are reviewed. Although warfarin has been an established therapy for stroke prevention in AF and VTE, the need for agents with less monitoring requirements, fewer food and drug interactions, and a lower risk of major bleeding led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Current DOACs work by either directly blocking thrombin (dabigatran) or inhibiting factor Xa (apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban). Edoxaban is the newest DOAC and only the second Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulant for once-daily administration. Unlike apixaban and rivaroxaban, edoxaban does not interact with the cytochrome P-450 system. The results of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 and Hokusai-VTE trials demonstrated edoxaban's noninferiority to warfarin. However, the adverse-effect profile of edoxaban may limit the drug's use in clinical practice; in clinical trials, patients with AF who had a creatinine clearance of ≥95 mL/min had a higher rate of strokes with the use of edoxaban versus warfarin. A review of the literature showed that edoxaban, the most recently approved DOAC, is noninferior to warfarin for management of VTE (after parenteral anticoagulant therapy) and for stroke risk reduction in many patients with nonvalvular AF.

Relative efficacy and safety of non-Vitamin K oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Network meta-analysis comparing apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban in three patient subgroups

BackgroundStroke is the most serious clinical consequence of atrial fibrillation, which is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as efficacious, safe and convenient stroke prevention agents. This updated network meta-analysis focused on the relative efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban for stroke prevention in (i) patients with CHADS2 score ≥2, (ii) secondary stroke prevention, and (iii) patients with high quality anticoagulation control with warfarin. Methods and resultsA fixed-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, including data from four Phase III randomised controlled trials (>70,000 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation). The results of the base-case analysis comparing NOACs with warfarin were broadly in line with the results from the individual trials.Results from the three subgroup analyses were broadly similar to the base case results. For example in patients with CHADS2 score ≥2, apixaban, high-dose dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and high-dose edoxaban had significantly lower hazards of stroke/systemic embolism compared with low-dose edoxaban. Apixaban and low-dose edoxaban were associated with significantly lower hazards of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban and dabigatran 150mg. However, several treatment comparisons that were significant in the base-case analysis were not significant in the patient subgroups, due to the reduced sample size of the subgroups compared with the overall population. ConclusionsAmong the NOACs, apixaban offered the most favourable efficacy and safety profile in the overall patient population as well as in the three subgroups investigated.

Edoxaban for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Oral anticoagulation is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one additional stroke risk factor. For decades, the vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) remained the only oral anticoagulant available for stroke prevention in AF. The non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are now available, and these drugs include the direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors. The latter class includes edoxaban, which has recently been approved for stroke prevention in AF by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency. In line with other NOACs, edoxaban avoids the many limitations of warfarin associated with variability of anticoagulation effect and multiple food and drug interactions.Areas covered: In this review, the currently available evidence on edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF is discussed. The pharmacology, efficacy and safety, and current aspects of use of edoxaban in patients with non-valvular AF for stroke and thromboembolism prevention are reviewed.Expert opinion: Phase III trials on edoxaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular AF confirms non-inferiority of edoxaban compared to well-managed warfarin both in terms of efficacy and safety. Currently ongoing and future trials as well as real-world data are warranted to confirm its effectiveness and safety for chronic anticoagulation and improve evidence in other areas which are lacking evidence where NOAC use remains controversial.

Cost-effectiveness of Apixaban Compared With Edoxaban for Stroke Prevention in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

PurposeThe purpose of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of apixaban 5 mg BID versus high- and low-dose edoxaban (60 mg and 30 mg once daily) as intended starting dose strategies for stroke prevention in patients from a UK National Health Service perspective. MethodsA previously developed and validated Markov model was adapted to evaluate the lifetime clinical and economic impact of apixaban 5 mg BID versus edoxaban (high and low dose) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. A pairwise indirect treatment comparison was conducted for clinical end points, and price parity was assumed between apixaban and edoxaban. Costs in 2012 British pounds, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, discounted at 3.5% per annum, were estimated. FindingsApixaban was predicted to increase life expectancy and QALYs versus low- and high-dose edoxaban. These gains were achieved at cost-savings versus low-dose edoxaban, thus being dominant and nominal increases in costs versus high-dose edoxaban. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of apixaban versus high-dose edoxaban was £6763 per QALY gained. ImplicationsApixaban was deemed to be dominant (less costly and more effective) versus low-dose edoxaban and a cost-effective alternative to high-dose edoxaban.

EMA recommends edoxaban for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation

EMA recommends edoxaban for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation