Fellow Editors Research Articles

A Year in Review: JCAG’s Inaugural Editorial Fellowship

A Year in Review: JCAG’s Inaugural Editorial Fellowship

JAMA Neurology Editorial Fellowship—Call for Applicants

JAMA Neurology Editorial Fellowship—Call for Applicants

Lifting the Veil of Journal Editing

AGU Publications is excited to announce Early Career Editorial Fellow programs for JGR: Biogeosciences and GeoHealth for mentoring the next generation of journal editors.

Editorial Fellowship—Call for Applicants

Editorial Fellowship—Call for Applicants

Reflections of an Editorial Fellow—A Window Into Medical Publishing

Reflections of an Editorial Fellow—A Window Into Medical Publishing

30 Years of Advancing the Field of Education Abroad: Reflections and New Directions for Frontiers

We used several reflection processes to assess where we are currently as a field and journal and to chart our future directions. First, after a SWOT analysis, the Editorial Board divided itself into three working groups, reflecting on the focus, organization, and quality of our work. Each made recommendations and brought them back for discussion with the full Board. Also, we invited a group of Visiting Distinguished Editorial Fellows to join us as action editors for a number of submissions whose review process had been complicated by the pandemic and editorial transition, and to come together for a reflective conversation on what they noticed and would like to see more of based on their long histories in the field. There were many parallel themes between this conversation and those of the Editorial Board working groups, which led us to plan several changes for our journal. Our consensus is that moving forward, we would like to support more robust engagement with the existing literature, rigorous methodologies, critical interdisciplinary thought pieces, and clearly articulated relevance to practice.

Inaugural editorial: Rehabilitation Psychology.

For over 50 years, Rehabilitation Psychology has helped highlight important issues experienced by the disability community. We are extremely excited to continue that legacy in our role as the journal's first dual editors-in-chief, and we look forward to working with our associate editors, Kathleen Bogart and Daniel Klyce, our editorial fellows, and our large editorial board and ad hoc reviewer pool. In our tenure as the journal's editors, we will focus heavily on (a) providing exceptional service, (b) emphasizing diversity and disability identity, (c) broadening the scope of the field, (d) promoting high-quality research standards, and (e) looking ahead. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Introducing the Expanded JAMA Internal Medicine Editorial Fellowship

Introducing the Expanded JAMA Internal Medicine Editorial Fellowship

The end of an era.

These volumes conclude a series initiated in 1974, marking almost fifty years of effort by a huge cohort of scholars. This review is thus a valedictory for the whole series as well as an account of what we have learned from the most recent volumes about Darwin's final years (1879-82). The project was begun by Frederick Burckhardt, who shared the editorial role for the early volumes with Sydney Smith and a rolling sequence of assistant editors and advisers who eventually comprised a significant fraction of the leading members of what used to be called the 'Darwin industry'. Smith passed away in 1988 (volume 7 notes his legacy). Burkardt too left this world in 2007 - volume 16, part 1 includes an obituary, but his name has been retained and Cambridge University Press still ask that the series be cited as 'Burkhardt et al.' Duncan Porter took over for volumes 8-15, again with a sequence of fellow editors and assistants, after which James Secord became head of the project through its final years. The dedications of successive volumes record the efforts of individual scholars who have aided the teams and the involvement of the many institutions and foundations that have leant moral and material support over the years. For those of us with Cambridge connections, the University Library will not seem the same without the presence of the team it supported.

The Time for Specialty Care Collaboration is Now: How the Consortium of Student-Led Eye Clinics Makes the Case

The Consortium of Student Led Eye Clinics (CSLEC) was founded in 2021 as a part of the Editorial Fellowship offered by the Journal of Student Run Free Clinics (JSRC), to increase collaboration between vision screening programs in the United States. So far, the CSLEC has recruited over a dozen programs, initiating a mentorship process to pair new organizations with long-established clinics. The CSLEC has also worked to generate bi-monthly workshops highlighting different operational strategies and insights from member institutions. With a multi-institution research team, a comprehensive survey has been an ongoing priority to assess baseline characteristics of vision screening programs, including from non-CSLEC member institutions. Ultimately, to further optimize and standardize operations across vision screening programs, the CSLEC seeks to incorporate the expertise of all member institutions to integrate consensus-based decision making to serve as a legitimate source of access to eye care, ultimately to identify and treat vision-threatening illness in populations without stable access.

Meeting the Raelyn Cole Editorial Fellows at the ASLO 2023 Aquatic Sciences Meeting: Perspectives on Professional Development, Writing, and Finding your Academic Superpower

Meeting the Raelyn Cole Editorial Fellows at the <scp>ASLO</scp> 2023 Aquatic Sciences Meeting: Perspectives on Professional Development, Writing, and Finding your Academic Superpower

Our Editorial Fellowship Program: Building Synergism.

Our Editorial Fellowship Program: Building Synergism.

Expressions of interest for the Journal of Physiotherapy Editorial Fellowship

Expressions of interest for the Journal of Physiotherapy Editorial Fellowship

Are we talking about the same thing? The case for stronger connections between graduate and worker employability research

Purpose and approachThis article presents the case for creating stronger connections between research on graduate and worker employability. We offer a narrative review of commonalities and differences between these research streams and offer thoughts and suggestions for further integration and mutual learning.FindingsWe outline some of the main theories and concepts in the graduate and worker employability domains. Furthermore, we analyze how these show considerable overlap, though they have barely connected with each other yet. We also formulate an agenda for future research that would spur stronger connections between the fields. Finally, we turn to our fellow authors, reviewers, and editors to encourage a more open approach to each other's work that would enable more cross-fertilization of knowledge.ImplicationsWe hope our narrative review, critical analysis and future research suggestions will lead to more collaborations and mutual learning among employability researchers in the educational, career and psychology areas.

Congratulations to the 2023 Editorial Fellows.

Congratulations to the 2023 Editorial Fellows.

Congratulations to the 2023 Editorial Fellows.

Congratulations to the 2023 Editorial Fellows.

In memory of Will Steffen, 1947–2023

Will Steffen’s death has prompted the present article that attempts to summarise the many aspects of his contribution to our understanding of Earth System science, his role as an outstanding leader and communicator and the affection and respect he earned from his many colleagues, friends and associates. Personal recollections of Will from his time as Executive Director of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and as contributor to and fellow editor of the Anthropocene Review are also included.

New Appointments as Raelyn Cole Editorial Fellows

Limnology and Oceanography BulletinEarly View ASLO News New Appointments as Raelyn Cole Editorial Fellows Jim Cloern, Jim Cloern [email protected] US Geological Survey, Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA, 94025 USASearch for more papers by this author Jim Cloern, Jim Cloern [email protected] US Geological Survey, Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA, 94025 USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 17 April 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/lob.10570Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue RelatedInformation

Editorial

Editorial

Cover, Table of Contents, Editor's Introduction

Editor’s Introduction to This Issue&#x0D; Saara Terry Grizzell University of Texas Rio Grande Valley&#x0D; On behalf of my co-founders and editorial colleagues, Dr. Roy Chen and Dr. Veronica Umeasiegbu, I am pleased to present the next issue of Contemporary Research in Disability and Rehabilitation (CRDR).&#x0D; This issue contains two articles. In the first article, Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening Practices in the United States and Mexico, Maria Valdez and colleagues present survey results using qualitative data and descriptive statistics to explore the screening and diagnostic practices of 35 professionals (30 in the U.S. and 5 in Mexico) who routinely work with children with ASD. In this study, Valdez and colleagues found many similarities in screening practices between professionals in the U.S. and Mexico. For example, in both the U.S. and Mexico the most frequently reported screening tool was the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT, Robins et al., 2001, 2009).&#x0D; Other similarities included parent involvement, key concerns around language development, a lack of routine screening for ASD, and the screening of children between the ages of 2 to 4 years old. Differences in screening and diagnostic practices involved the professionals engaged in screening for ASD and the referral process in the aftermath of failed ASD screenings.&#x0D; In the second article, Multicultural Counselor Supervision and Perceived Differences on Client Outcomes, Dr. Perez and colleagues present original research exploring the differences in perceptions among counselor supervisors and supervisees about the impact of multicultural supervision upon client outcomes. In this study, sixty-one participants consisted of faculty, counselor supervisors, counselors, and graduate students in counseling programs. This study found that multicultural supervision/competence predicted supervisor perceptions of client outcome, thus highlighting the importance of multicultural supervision and the need to improve training in multicultural competence.&#x0D; With that being said, I hope you enjoy this publication of CRDR.&#x0D; Sincerely,&#x0D; Saara Terry Grizzell, Ph.D., CRC, LVRC, LCDC, LPC Outgoing Editor, CRDR