ABSTRACT Many economic and historical accounts mention the forms of capitalism in Surat. The paper argues that while capitalism has always been central to examining Surat, existing literature mainly focuses on the owners of capital and the relationships among them. The notions of weaver, mercantile, or ethnic capitalism primarily focused on capital accumulation by artisanal castes, the role of foreign capital, and social trust among capital owners, respectively. While some analyses reveal the process of labour exploitation due to India's liberalisation and growing informal economy, the narratives and nuances of labour experience are scant. In this paper, I theorise precarity capitalism through the experience of migrant workers in Surat’s powerloom units. Odia labour migrants from the Ganjam district of Odisha have been migrating to Surat since the 1950s and, as of 2018, form one of the largest migrant communities. Through ethnographic data, I argue that the workers experience precarity across different temporal and spatial scales. Moving beyond shop floors, I argue that precarity capitalism underscores the precarious entanglement between Ganjam and Surat.
Read full abstract