Abstract Introduction It is increasingly clear that RSV infections in older adults significantly impact the UKs already strained public health system. However, the true burden remains underestimated (Korsten K, Eur Respir J, 2021, 57, 2,002,688; Sharp A, Influenza Other Respir Viruses, 2022, 16, 125–131). We conducted a TLR to scrutinise the available data and reveal evidence gaps. Methods A TLR search was conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, and ECON Lit to identify existing literature from Jan 2011-Aug 2023 and grey literature. Eligibility criteria were defined based on population (intervention/comparator (no limit), outcomes (clinical, epidemiological, economic and QoL) and limited to UK-only results. Results Despite the broad criteria, only 14 out of 1013 studies were included. Nine studies reported on epidemiological outcomes, one on epidemiology and costs, and four on model outcomes. Due to the small number of studies and the heterogeneity in study design and outcomes, it was not possible to draw reliable conclusions on incidence, prevalence, and mortality. One model paper showed that a hypothetical RSV vaccine could be cost effective in the UK, depending on incidence, vaccine effectiveness and cost. All identified studies emphasise the challenges in estimating the true burden due to limitations in testing and a lack of standardised disease definition in older adults. There is a lack of evidence for risk groups, particularly clinical and economic consequences for RSV patients at a higher risk of infection and severe sequelae. Conclusion Only a limited number of studies meeting the criteria focused on RSV infection in older adults were found, with nearly no data on risk groups and related cost. It is imperative that surveillance and testing are improved to understand the true burden. This will serve as a basis for evaluating cost-effectiveness and decisions on the most effective measures to lower the burden, including vaccination programmes.