EBV-negative Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Research Articles

Genomic Landscaping of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders Using Circulating Tumor DNA

Introduction: Identification of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a diagnostic challenge. The current diagnostic framework usually require analysis on tissue and imaging through PET/CT scans. Yet, these methods have diagnostic limitations. For instance due to missing information on tumor heterogeneity and relatively low sensitivity of PET/CT scans. Measuring cell free DNA (cfDNA) represents a novel, minimally-invasive method for tumor detection and genotyping. In this study we explored the feasibility of plasma cfDNA tumor genotyping with targeted deep sequencing to detect copy number variation (CNV), single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and Epstein Bar Virus (EBV) sequences, using a new in-house variant calling pipeline. Methods: In this multi-center observational cohort study of 18 patients diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, we performed deep targeted NGS for SNV detection and low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) for CNV detection. NGS was targeted on a panel of genes (n = 39) known to be recurrently mutated in B-cell lymphomas (244 kbp). All patients gave written informed consent. The R package CNAclinic was used to identify genome wide CNAs and fraction of the genome altered (FGA). The ichorCNA package was used to determine the ctDNA fraction in cfDNA samples. SNVs were called using a pipeline, combining 4 (cfDNA) SNV calling tools: Mutect2, LoFreq, VarDict & SiNVICT. Variants were filtered on presumed functional effect (Synonymous-, UTR-, Intron-, 2 kb upstream-, 2 kb downstream variants were removed). A "panel of normals” (variant blacklist) was generated from variants found in cfDNA from healthy controls, which was used to produce a variant blacklist to filter out technical artifacts and SNPs. Finally, variants with a variant allele frequency (VAF) < 1% and variants with an allele frequency (AF) of > 1% in 1000Genomes and/or gnomAD were filtered out. Results: The cohort included 18 PTLD patients. The majority of patients had stage IV disease (n=13, 76%). All of the PTLD cases were histologically proven, of diffuse large B cell lymphoma type and 10/18 patients (55%) were considered to have an EBV-negative tumor. EBV copy number in plasma was performed by qPCR in 12 patients and was considered to be elevated in four patients (>5000 copies/mL). The fraction of reads mapping to the EBV genome was compared between controls (n=8), EBV-negative PTLD (n=10) and EBV-positive PTLD (n=8). The median fraction of EBV reads for controls and EBV-negative PTLD were similar with a fraction of 1.5x10-4 (Q1-Q3: 1.3x10-4-1.6x10-4) and 1.8x10-4 (Q1-Q3: 1.4x10-4-3.9x10-4), respectively (p>0.05, Kruskal-Wallis). In EBV-positive tumors, the median fraction of EBV reads was 3-log higher, 5.3x10-1 (Q1-Q3: 7.3 x10-2-2) (p≤0.05, Kruskal-Wallis) CNVs were detected in cfDNA of 11/18 (61%) patients. Two of the patients in whom no CNVs were detected had initiated therapy at the time of plasma sampling. Median fraction of genome altered was higher in EBV-negative tumors (0.03, Q1-Q3: 2.5x10-4-0.12) than in EBV-positive tumors (5x10-4, Q1-Q3: 0-0.03), but this difference was not significant (p>0.05, Mann-Whitney U) (Figure 1). In the top 15 recurrently mutated genes (described below), across all 18 samples, 180 SNVs were found in total. The median amount of SNVs found in each sample was 11 (range 6-25). The most frequently mutated gene was CREPPB (12/18, 67%), in which the most prevalent mutation was p.K1497T (8/18, 44%). ARID1A was mutated in 10/18 cases (56%), followed by KMT2D (9/18, 50%). TET2, TP53, MEF2B & TNFAIP3 were all mutated in 7/18 cases (39%). SPEN & IRF2BP2 were mutated in 6/18 cases (33%). PIM1, NOTCH1, ATM, CARD11, DDX3X, IGLL5 were all mutated in 5/18 cases (28%) (Figure 2). Few of the mutations that are called in the top 15 recurrently mutated genes (8/180, 0.04%) lay close to 50% VAF, which might imply that these are SNPs not filtered out by the pipeline. Our SNV findings are comparable with previous literature, in which KMT2D, TET2 & TP53 are also amongst top-mutated genes (Menter et al., 2017), highlighting disruption of epigenetic regulation, NFkB pathway, and DNA damage response as drivers of PTLD. Conclusion: lcWGS in combination deep targeted sequencing allows for detection of CNV an SNV in diagnostic samples of patients with monomorphic PTLD. These data can potentially be used at screening, diagnosis and response monitoring, which is part of the ongoing prospective study NTR 7402. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

ABCL-542 Prevalence and Characterization of EBV-Negative Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

A common and potentially fatal post-solid organ transplant (SOT) complication is post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). While the association of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) with the development of PTLD is well recognized, little is known about the etiology of EBV-negative PTLD. To characterize the differences between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLD to better understand the pathogenesis of EBV-negative PTLD. This was a retrospective study that reviewed patients who developed PTLD after SOT. Data was collected on PTLD patients (>18 years) from 2011 to 2021. Data included demographics, SOT type, time from SOT to PTLD development, tumor EBV status, PTLD site, histopathological morphology, tumor markers, and overall survival. EBV tumor status was compared using χ2, Fisher's Exact, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. A single, large academic center. A total of 99 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 45.5% were EBV-positive and 54.5% were EBV-negative. Tumor EBV status did not differ by race, but males were more likely to be EBV-negative (63% v. 44.4% of females, p=0.065). EBV tumor status did not differ by SOT type. The interval between SOT and PTLD diagnosis was longer in EBV-negative patients (8.68 years) than EBV-positive patients (4.93 years) (p=0.001). There was a significant difference in EBV-negative PTLD site (p=0.046) and PTLD subtypes (p=0.002). Site of EBV-negative PTLD consisted of gastrointestinal (38.9%), head/neck (11.1%), liver/spleen (11.1%), CNS (3.7%), other lymph (24%), and other non-lymph (11.1%). Monomorphic (65.5%) and T-cell (90%) subtypes were more common in EBV-negative patients, compared to the polymorphic (15.4%) and plasmablastic/plasmacytic (27.3%) subtypes. Expression of CD20 did not differ by tumor EBV status. Those who were CD30-negative were more likely to be EBV-negative (90% v. 25%, p=<0.001). Those who were CD138-negative were more likely to be EBV-negative (75% v. 26.7%, p=0.012). There was no difference in overall survival by tumor EBV status. This single institution retrospective review shows that there are distinct differences between EBV-negative and EBV-positive PTLD. EBV-negative PTLD has a longer interval from SOT to PTLD development, is more likely to occur in the gastrointestinal tract, and is more likely to have a monomorphic morphology.

Fatal Case of EBV-negative Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in an Adult Kidney Transplant Recipient.

Fatal Case of EBV-negative Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in an Adult Kidney Transplant Recipient.

Spleen-Restricted Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in the First Year After Kidney Transplant – A Case Report

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a feared complication after transplant. They are mostly of B cell origin and are frequently Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive, particularly in early onset PTLD. Later on, non-B and EBV-negative PTLD are increasingly reported. EBV seronegative receptors (particularly when paired with an EBV seropositive donor) together with the net degree of immunosuppression-a concept often difficult to quantify-are the most consistently described risk factors for the development of PTLD. Conversely, its association with a particular immunosuppressive agent or other virus, namely cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or disease, has been inconsistently reported. We present a challenging case where an EBV negative monomorphic peripheric T-cell lymphoma was diagnosed in the first year after kidney transplant in a patient with a recent history of CMV disease from a resistant strain.

Distinct immunopathological mechanisms of EBV-positive and EBV-negative posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders

EBV-positive and EBV-negative posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) arise in different immunovirological contexts and might have distinct pathophysiologies. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted a multicentric prospective study with 56EBV-positive and 39EBV-negative PTLD patients of the K-VIROGREF cohort, recruited at PTLD diagnosis and before treatment (2013-2019), and compared them to PTLD-free Transplant Controls (TC, n=21). We measured absolute lymphocyte counts (n=108), analyzed NK- and T cell phenotypes (n=49 and 94), and performed EBV-specific functional assays (n=16 and 42) by multiparameter flow cytometry and ELISpot-IFNγ assays (n=50). EBV-negative PTLD patients, NK cells overexpressed Tim-3; the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was poorer in patients with a CD4 lymphopenia (CD4+ <300 cells/mm3 , p<.001). EBV-positive PTLD patients presented a profound NK-cell lymphopenia (median=60 cells/mm3 ) and a high proportion of NK cells expressing PD-1 (vs. TC, p=.029) and apoptosis markers (vs. TC, p<.001). EBV-specific T cells of EBV-positive PTLD patients circulated in low proportions, showed immune exhaustion (p=.013 vs. TC) and poorly recognized the N-terminal portion of EBNA-3A viral protein. Altogether, this broad comparison of EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLDs highlight distinct patterns of immunopathological mechanisms between these two diseases and provide new clues for immunotherapeutic strategies and PTLD prognosis.

Natural Killer Cells in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Simple SummaryPost-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are life-threatening complications. The clinical and pathological spectrum of PTLD is broad; however, most cases of PTLD are associated with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection and the use of immunosuppression treatment required to prevent graft rejection. While T-cell impairment is known to play a critical role in the immunopathogenesis of EBV complications post-transplantation, the role of natural killer (NK) cells remains more elusive. NK cells are key elements of the innate immune system that use a sophisticated array of activating, costimulatory, and inhibitory receptors to kill virally infected and/or cancerous cells. In this review we highlight the role of NK cells in the pathogenesis of PTLD, and also identify future avenues for NK cell therapy research. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are life-threatening complications arising after solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Although the majority of these lymphoproliferations are of B cell origin, and are frequently associated with primary Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection or reactivation in the post-transplant period, rare cases of T cell and natural killer (NK) cell-originated PTLDs have also been described. A general assumption is that PTLDs result from the impairment of anti-viral and anti-tumoral immunosurveillance due to the long-term use of immunosuppressants in transplant recipients. T cell impairment is known to play a critical role in the immune-pathogenesis of post-transplant EBV-linked complications, while the role of NK cells has been less investigated, and is probably different between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLDs. As a part of the innate immune response, NK cells are critical for protecting hosts during the early response to virus-induced tumors. The complexity of their function is modulated by a myriad of activating and inhibitory receptors expressed on cell surfaces. This review outlines our current understanding of NK cells in the pathogenesis of PTLD, and discusses their potential implications for current PTLD therapies and novel NK cell-based therapies for the containment of these disorders.

Epstein-Barr virus-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: beyond chemotherapy treatment.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare but life-threatening complication of both allogeneic solid organ (SOT) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The histology of PTLD ranges from benign polyclonal lymphoproliferation to a lesion indistinguishable from classic monoclonal lymphoma. Most commonly, PTLDs are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positive and result from loss of immune surveillance over EBV. Treatment for PTLD differs from the treatment for typical non-Hodgkin lymphoma because prognostic factors are different, resistance to treatment is unique, and there are specific concerns for organ toxicity. While recipients of HCT have a limited time during which they are at risk for this complication, recipients of SOT have a lifelong requirement for immunosuppression, so approaches that limit compromising or help restore immune surveillance are of high interest. Furthermore, while EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLDs are not intrinsically resistant to chemotherapy, the poor tolerance of chemotherapy in the post-transplant setting makes it essential to minimize potential treatment-related toxicities and explore alternative treatment algorithms. Therefore, reduced-toxicity approaches such as single-agent CD20 monoclonal antibodies or bortezomib, reduced dosing of standard chemotherapeutic agents, and non-chemotherapy-based approaches such as cytotoxic T cells have all been explored. Here, we review the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy treatment landscape for PTLD.

A 9-Year-Old Male with Barth Syndrome and a Cardiac Transplant Presenting with Hyperviscosity Syndrome Caused By EBV-Negative Plasmacytic PTLD

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a spectrum of disorders characterized by lymphoid or plasmacytic proliferation secondary to extrinsic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant (SOT) or hematopoietic transplant recipients. According the 2016 revision of World Health Organization (WHO) classification, PTLD ranges from early lesion (mononucleosis-like) lymphoid hyperplasia or plasmacytic hyperplasia, polymorphic, monomorphic to classical Hodgkin lymphoma PTLD (Swerdlow et. al. Blood 2016). The incidence of PTLD in the pediatric population is closely associated with the type of transplanted organ, with the highest incidence in lung and small bowel transplant recipients due to chronic, iatrogenic immunosuppression. While Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is the key driver of abnormal lymphocytic proliferation in the majority of PTLDs, EBV-negative PTLD is a distinct subtype. We hereby report a 9-year-old boy with Barth syndrome, a rare genetic syndrome caused by a TAZ mutation, characterized by dilated cardiomyopathy, skeletal myopathy, neutropenia, and short stature. He required a heart transplant for left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy at 11 months of age and presented with lower GI bleeding, acute-onset anemia, somnolence, retinal hemorrhages, and increased serum viscosity eight years post transplant. Workup was significant for hyperimmunoglobulinemia with elevated IgA and IgG, and serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) showed two monoclonal bands (IgA Lambda and IgG Kappa) and an M spike. He was treated with plasmapheresis, and his symptoms improved significantly. Further workup with PET/CT scan showed diffuse lymphadenopathy of cervical, mediastinal, axillary, abdominal, and inguinal lymph nodes. Axillary lymph node biopsy was done, demonstrating a nondestructive morphology with an increase in plasma cells expressing excess lambda light chain and IgA; these abnormal cells were CD20 negative and CD138 positive, suggesting a clonal process. Cytogenetic fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed loss of TP53. Serum EBV detection by PCR and EBER staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on lymph node pathology were negative. Bone marrow biopsy showed a hypocellular marrow with trilineage hematopoiesis and 5-10% CD138 positive plasma cells. Combined, these studies were consistent with the diagnosis of early onset, nondestructive, plasmacytic PTLD. The patient was treated with a multiple myeloma-type therapy with dexamethasone and bortezomib (Short et. al. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2016), in addition to reduced immunosuppression consisting of low dose tacrolimus. Repeat PET/CT scan after 2 cycles of therapy showed resolution of previous PET-avid lesions. Stem cell collection was performed after 3 cycles in case of relapsed or recurrent disease. He completed 5 cycles of therapy with no complications. Unfortunately, the patient's end of treatment PET/CT scan was significant for a new mediastinal mass and multiple intraabdominal lymph nodes. Lymph node biopsy showed a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, which was IgA and lambda positive. The cells showed plasmacytoid features, but in contrast to the initial biopsy at diagnosis, there was marked CD20 positivity (image attached). This recurrence was most suggestive of a marginal zone lymphoma like PTLD (Galera et. al. Am J Surg Pathol 2020). He was initiated on therapy with rituximab and bendamustine. He is currently status post 2 treatment cycles and doing well. We continue to discuss the utility of autologous bone marrow transplant in this case, although the risks and benefits will have to be weighed carefully in a child who is prone to develop infections and complications from Barth Syndrome. We would like to share this case of EBV negative, plasmacytic PTLD with relapsed marginal zone lymphoma type PTLD to highlight the heterozygous pathologies of PTLD in children, and to share our experience of treating in the absence of standard protocol due to the rarity of this diagnosis. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after solid organ transplant (SOT): A multicenter real world analysis (RWA) of 877 patients (pts) treated in the modern era.

e20026 Background: Historically, SOT PTLD have modest outcomes in part due to heterogeneous treatment approaches. Additionally, there remains an absence of a large data repository in PTLD to help delineate contemporary pt outcomes &amp; prognostic factors. We conducted a large, multicenter RWA to study outcomes &amp; prognostication of SOT PTLD in the modern era. Methods: Retrospective data on 877 untreated SOT PTLD pts ages ≥18 years (yrs) (2000-2018) were analyzed from 15 academic centers. Prognostic factors for relapse free survival (RFS) &amp; overall survival (OS) were assessed by Cox model. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 54 yrs (range 18-84). The majority of pts were white (78%) &amp; male (67%). Median time from SOT to PTLD diagnosis was 57 months (range 0.23-470). SOT types: kidney (41%) liver (19%), lung (16%), and heart (11%); 11% multi-organ. Tumor was EBV+ in 52%. Graft involvement (18%) and rejection (21%) were seen in a proportion of pts. Most pts had reduction in immunosuppression (79%) and rituximab (R)-containing regimen (61%) as part of 1st line therapy (Tx). Most common Tx: R monotherapy (34%), R+chemotherapy (29%) &amp; chemotherapy without R (8%). Maintenance R use was infrequent (6%). Overall response rate was 63% [51% complete response (CR) and 12% partial response (PR)] and 19% of pts had primary refractory disease. With 44-month median follow-up (0.1-304), 62% of pts were alive. Median OS &amp; RFS for all pts were 12 &amp; 9 yrs, respectively, while differential survival rates were identified for several pt subsets (Table). On univariate analysis, lung SOT was associated with borderline RFS (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.44-1.03], P= 0.07) and inferior OS (HR 0.67 [95% CI 0.49-0.91], P= 0.012), while EBV negative PTLD was associated with poorer RFS (HR 1.51 [95% CI 1.12-2.04, P= 0.006). In addition, achievement of PR to 1st line Tx vs CR was strongly prognostic for inferior RFS (HR 2.58 [95% CI 1.88-3.54], P&lt; .0001) and OS (HR 2.30 [95% CI 1.60-3.29], P&lt; .0001). Conclusions: In this large, multicenter PTLD RWA, type of SOT was strongly associated with long-term RFS and OS and EBV status predicted RFS. Furthermore, depth of response to 1st line Tx was a critical determinant for long-term pt survival. [Table: see text]

Survival outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants with EBV-positive or EBV-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, A CIBMTR study.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Although most PTLD is EBV-positive (EBVpos ), EBV-negative (EBVneg ) PTLD is reported, yet its incidence and clinical impact remain largely undefined. Furthermore, factors at the time of transplant impacting survival following PTLD are not well described. Between 2002 and 2014, 432 cases of PTLD following alloHCT were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). After exclusions, 267 cases (EBVpos =222, 83%; EBVneg =45, 17%) were analyzed. Two hundred and eight patients (78%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. Incidence of PTLD was highest using umbilical cord donors (UCB, 1.60%) and lowest using matched related donors (MRD, 0.40%). Clinical features and histology did not significantly differ among EBVpos or EBVneg PTLD cases except that absolute lymphocyte count recovery was slower, and CMV reactivation was later in EBVneg PTLD [EBVpos 32 (5-95) days versus EBVneg 47 (10-70) days, P=.016]. There was no impact on survival by EBV status in multivariable analysis [EBVneg RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94-2.15, P=.097]. There is no difference in survival outcomes for patients with EBVpos or EBVneg PTLD occurring following alloHCT and 1-year survival is poor. Features of conditioning and use of serotherapy remain important.

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder of Appendix Mimicking Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) can be Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive lymphoproliferations occurring in the first year after transplantation or EBV-negative lymphoma occurring many years after transplantation. Both B-cell and T-cell type of PTLD are described in the literature. In the gastrointestinal tract, the small and large intestine are the common sites of involvement. PTLD of the appendix is a lesser-known entity and cases described previously presented clinically as acute appendicitis. We report a case of EBV-negative B-cell PTLD of the appendix mimicking acute appendicitis in a live young renal allograft recipient 7 years after transplantation.

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Epstein‐Barr virus infection, and disease in solid organ transplantation: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice review the diagnosis, management, and prevention of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) and other Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) syndromes after solid organ transplantation. PTLD are a heterogeneous spectrum of predominantly B-cell disorders, often extra-nodal, with complex distinct pathogeneses and variable clinical presentations determined by pathologic subtype. Recent epidemiologic studies report a decrease in early EBV-positive (+) PTLD and an increase in late EBV-negative (-) PTLD. Pre-transplant EBV-seronegativity and primary EBV infection, often from donor-transmitted infection, are an important risk factors for EBV syndromes and early EBV+PTLD. Low-quality evidence supports preemptive prevention strategies for early EBV+PTLD in EBV-seronegative recipients that involve EBV DNA measurement in peripheral blood using assays requiring further result harmonization, combined with interventions to lower viral load. Reduction in immunosuppression (RIS) is the best validated intervention. WHO pathology classification of a tissue biopsy remains the gold standard for PTLD diagnosis; optimal staging procedures are uncertain. Treatment of CD20+ PTLD with the response-dependent sequential use of RIS, rituximab, and cytotoxic chemotherapy is recommended. Evidence gaps requiring future research and alternate treatment strategies including immunotherapy are highlighted.

The Changing Epidemiology of Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Over 30 Years: A Single-center Experience.

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT) associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for PTLD among adult SOT recipients at our center over 30 years (1984-2013). We also compared PTLD incidence before and after a prevention strategy of EBV viral load monitoring in EBV serology mismatched patients was adapted in 2001 (ie, transplant era 1 [1983-2001] vs era 2 [2002-2013]). Among 4171 SOT patients, 109 developed PTLD. Cumulative incidence at 1, 10, and 20 years posttransplant was 0.95, 2.3, and 3.5 per 100 person-years, respectively. Beyond the first year peak of almost exclusively EBV-positive PTLD, a lower incidence of PTLD, predominantly EBV negative, persisted for 20 years. Thoracic transplant (hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; P = 0.007) and negative EBV serology (HR, 7.7; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PTLD on multivariate Cox regression analysis. EBV seronegativity significantly increased risk of early (HR, 18.5) and EBV-positive PTLD (HR, 14.2), as well as late (HR, 4.9) and EBV-negative PTLD (HR, 3.6) on univariate analyses. Risk of early PTLD was significantly reduced in the recent transplant era (0.8% era 2 vs 1.9% era 1 at 5 years, P = 0.002); this reduction was seen in recent era EBV seropositive (P = 0.035 at 5 years) but not seronegative recipients (P = 0.90 year 5), suggesting lack of impact of viral load monitoring. Adult SOT recipients face a prolonged risk of late PTLD, whereas risk of early PTLD may have declined in recent years.

Elucidation of the miRNome in EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLD

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication of organ transplantation characterized by abnormal proliferation of lymphoid cells in the setting of immunosuppression after transplantation. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is responsible for abnormal lymphocyte proliferation in 50–80% of PTLDs, particularly in early-onset disease. The remaining PTLDs (20–50%) are EBV-negative, with etiology currently unknown. EBV was the first human virus found to encode microRNAs (miRNA). In addition to encoding miRNAs, EBV has also been found to modulate expression and regulation of host-cell-encoded miRNAs. The purpose of this study was to define the miRNome of EBV+ and EBV- PTLD. RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of EBV+ and EBV- PTLD tumors (n=5 for each). miRNA-microarray profiling was used to evaluate expression levels of miRNA. One-way ANOVA analysis was used to identify the miRNAs differentially modulated within the groups. 118 miRNAs in total were found to be differentially expressed, in particular 76 up-regulated and 42 down-regulated. In order to validate these initial results, RNA was isolated from additional FFPE tissue sections of EBV+ (n=10) and EBV- (n=5) PTLD tumors, and real-time qPCR was used. Thus far, three miRNAs (hsa-miR-155, hsa-miR-17, and hsa-miR-106a) have been shown to be statistically significantly regulated. Specifically, expression levels of hsa-miR-155 were 2.8-fold greater in EBV+ PTLD tumors (p=0.05). In contrast, levels of hsa-miR-17 and has-miR-106a were 2.2 fold (p=0.04) and 2.1 fold (p=0.05) higher, respectively in EBV- tumors. EBV-encoded miRNAs were also analyzed, and 35 viral miRNAs were detected in EBV+ PTLD. The EBV miRNAs include EBV-miR-BART7-3P, EBV-miR-BART1-5p, EBV-miR-BART14-3p, EBV-miR-BART8-3P, and EBV-miR-BART11-5P. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the miRNA profile of EBV+ PTLD tumors is distinguishable from EBV- PTLD tumors and suggest that miRNA may be useful as biomarkers in PTLD.

536 - Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants with EBV Positive or EBV Negative Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)

536 - Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplants with EBV Positive or EBV Negative Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD)

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Presenting as Cardiogenic Shock With Tamponade

SESSION TITLE: Transplantation SESSION TYPE: Affiliate Case Report Poster PRESENTED ON: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM INTRODUCTION: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are malignancies associated with solid organ transplantation or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation requiring immunosuppression. Most cases are associated with EBV positivity, but less commonly EBV negative PTLD occurs. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old Caucasian male presented with cardiogenic shock due to pericardial effusion with tamponade. His history was significant for type I diabetes mellitus leading to ESRD, two failed renal transplants on immunosuppression, and current peritoneal dialysis dependence. Echocardiogram upon admission demonstrated pericardial effusion with right ventricular collapse. Pericardiocentesis and pericardial drain placement were performed. Approximately 2.4L of fluid was drained. Cytology of the cell block was negative for malignancy. He improved after drainage and was discharged on day 16. Two days after discharge he returned complaining of weakness. A left sided pleural effusion was detected and drained via catheter. Cell block cytology was remarkable for monomorphic PTLD, plasma cell neoplasm. Five days after pleural catheter placement he developed multifactorial shock that led to a whole-body CT with contrast. This revealed dilation of the jejunum measuring 5.1cm, as well as a mass that measured 8.4 x 5.6. x 5.4 cm. The mass demonstrated atypical plasma cells consistent with the cell block. Discontinuing immunosuppression was the initial step in treatment in this case. Further work up for plasmacytoma or multiple myeloma demonstrated negative SPEP and negative lambda ratio confirming a solitary plasmacytoma. A skeletal survey was completed with no signs of lytic lesions or evidence of multiple myeloma. A bone marrow biopsy was unable to be completed as the patient expired. DISCUSSION: The lesion consisted of atypical plasma cells similar to cases of EBV-negative PTLD previously mentioned in the literature. This is currently a designation not clearly defined by the World Health Organization. These findings call for further investigation to discover the mechanism of disease and promote effective therapy. Therapy in EBV-negative PTLD does not seem to respond to the established algorithm for EBV-positive PTLD. Reducing immunosuppression often makes no difference. Some cases require high dose immunosupression to achieve therapeutic success, which is the opposite of the standard treatment for PTLD. Defining the mechanism behind these tumors is imperative for better classification as well as directed therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This case is remarkable for PTLD with CD20 negativity; additionally, PCR for EBV was negative. EBV is typically the primary driver of PTLD. The mechanism of EBV negative PTLD remains unknown. Reference #1: Swerdlow SH, Harris NL, Pileri S, Stein H, Jaffe ES. The 2008 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms and beyond: evolving concepts and practical applications. Blood. 2011;117(19):5019-5032. doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-293050. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Matthew Boulos, Anil Singh, David Aljadir, Tina Dudney No Product/Research Disclosure Information

Response to Rituximab Induction Is a Predictive Biomarker in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and Allows Successful Treatment Stratification in an International Phase II Trial Including 152 Patients

Response to Rituximab Induction Is a Predictive Biomarker in Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and Allows Successful Treatment Stratification in an International Phase II Trial Including 152 Patients

II. Challenges in the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

II. Challenges in the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are a serious complication after solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and include a range of diseases from benign proliferations to malignant lymphomas. Risk factors for developing PTLD include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, recipient age, transplanted organ, type of immunosuppression, and genetics. Uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected B cells is implicated in EBV-positive PTLD, whereas the pathogenesis of EBV-negative PTLD may be similar to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the general population. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies PTLD into four categories: early lesions, polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). Treatment is aimed at cure of PTLD, while maintaining transplanted organ function. However, there are no established guidelines for the treatment of PTLD. Immune suppression reduction (ISR) is the first line of treatment in most cases, with more recent data suggesting early use of rituximab. In more aggressive forms of PTLD, upfront chemotherapy may offer a better and more durable response. Sequential therapy using rituximab followed by chemotherapy has demonstrated promising results and may establish a standard of care. Novel therapies including anti-viral agents, adoptive immunotherapy, and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines require further study in the prevention and treatment of PTLD.

A population-based study of 135 lymphomas after solid organ transplantation: The role of Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis C and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype in clinical presentation and survival

Background. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) plays a major role in the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), but there is an increasing awareness of EBV-negative PTLD. The clinical presentation of EBV-negative PTLD has not been as well characterised as EBV-positive cases. Further, there is limited knowledge on the clinical importance of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cell of origin subtype post-transplant. Materials and methods. We studied the role of EBV, hepatitis C (HCV) and DLBCL subtype in clinical presentation and survival in 135 post-transplant lymphomas diagnosed 1980–2006 in a population-based cohort of 10 010 Swedish solid organ transplant recipients. The lymphomas were re-evaluated according to WHO 2008, examined for EBV, and clinical data were collected from medical records. Results. Lymphoma incidence rate was 159/100 000 person-years and is also reported by lymphoma subtype. EBV-negative lymphomas constituted 48% and were associated with HCV infection (p = 0.02), bone marrow involvement (p < 0.001), and T-cell phenotype (p = 0.002). Among DLBCL, 78% were of non-germinal centre subtype, which was associated with EBV-positivity (69%, p = 0.001), early occurrence (p = 0.03), heart/liver/lung/pancreas recipients (p = 0.02), anti-T-cell globulin (p = 0.001), and tacrolimus treatment (p = 0.02). DLBCL subtypes had similar overall survival. Five-year overall survival was 42% in all treated patients. Independent poor prognostic factors were older age, B symptoms, ECOG 2-4, kidney/pancreas/heart recipients, T-cell lymphoma, and HCV-infection. Conclusions. With long follow-up, a large part of PTLD is EBV-negative, due to a high proportion of T-cell lymphomas and low of polymorphic PTLD. EBV-negative PTLD have a different clinical presentation. HCV may play an aetiological role in late-onset PTLD and was revealed as a new prognostic factor for inferior survival that needs to be confirmed in larger studies. The heavier immunosuppression in non-kidney transplantations seems to play a role in the development of non-germinal centre DLBCL. DLBCL cell of origin subtype lacks prognostic importance in the transplant setting.