INTRODUCTIONEvidence-based medicine (EBM) is an importantcomponent of an undergraduate medical educationcurriculum that promotes lifelong learning andcritical thinking [1]. Defined as ‘‘the conscientious,explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence inmaking decisions about the care of individualpatients’’ [2], EBM can be considered another impor-tant clinical tool, not unlike the stethoscope. Theauthors designed and assessed an innovative EBMcourse for third-year medical students to strengthenthe EBM curriculum for undergraduate medicaleducation.BACKGROUNDPrevious studies have advocated real-time teaching ofEBM during attending rounds, in a case-based formatwith role playing or with standardized patients [3–5].At the same time, brief training in literature searchingand critical appraisal skills has been shown to beeffective, and interactive workshops have beensuggested as an ideal format for medical students[6–8]. At many academic medical centers, includingthe authors’, constraints on resident and student dutyhours and increased demands for productivity fromclinical teaching faculty have made adding formalcurricula to the clinical services problematic. In aneffort to combine an interactive learning environmentwith core topics in EBM, we devised a multidisciplin-ary, case-based seminar series that is team-taughtby clinicians and a librarian and is designed to beinteractive, engaging, and clinically relevant.METHODSDesigned by a medical librarian and a physician(Schardt and Gagliardi), the EBM course is intendedto provide an interactive forum for students todevelop skills in practicing EBM in the care ofpatients. The first version of the EBM course wasoffered as a noncredit elective to 8 third-year medicalstudents in 2006 and consisted of 6 90-minute sessionsconducted over the course of the spring semester.After experimenting with a 10-session format, wesettled on 6 120-minute sessions conducted onconsecutive Thursday evenings, from 5:00 p.m. to7:00 p.m.After the third iteration of the course in 2008, itbecame a credit-bearing elective, which requiredopening it not only to third-year medical students,but also to fourth-year medical students. Since the2008/09 academic year, the EBM course has attractedapproximately forty students per year. The currentstudy with pre- and post-course assessments ofknowledge as well as attitudes was conducted duringthe 2008/09 academic year.The EBM course is designed to optimize studentreadiness and participation, faculty willingness toteach, and instructional strategies to maximize reten-tion and use of EBM skills, with key features outlinedbelow.1. Timing in the curriculumAt our institution, medical students complete theirrequired clinical clerkships during the second year.The EBM course is designed for students who arepursuing academic endeavors during the third year,which is dedicated to research. This is optimal timingbecause students have completed their requiredclinical clerkships and, therefore, have had somepatient care experience along with the opportunity toobserve and practice EBM in a variety of settings.Additionally, as they are about halfway through theirscholarly research activity year, they are cognizant ofsome of the logistical and practical issues involved indesigning and conducting scientific research.2. Course organization and facultyTable 1 shows the course outline. The introductorysession provides an overview of the EBM frameworkand the basics of study design. The subsequent foursessions are case based and teach relevant issuespertaining to the retrieval, appraisal, and applicationof studies of therapy, diagnosis, harm, and systematicreviews. The final session is designed to demonstratethe real-time application of EBM skills. Cliniciansfrom the emergency department and in-patient unitstake students through actual clinical cases they haveencountered and demonstrate how they used EBM tocontribute to their care of actual patients. Each caseusually takes five to fifteen minutes and effectivelydemonstrates that EBM can be incorporated intoclinical practice.We rely on a diverse faculty with a broad spectrumof clinical interest and experience. Facilitators areclinically based and recruited from departments anddisciplines in which they are likely to have encoun-tered many of the students in clinical settings. Inthis way, no one faculty member is responsible fordelivering of all content, students benefit fromwitnessing the use of EBM skills by a variety of
Read full abstract