Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Research Articles

Balancing Objective Markers and Subjective Experience in Eating Disorder Diagnoses: Commentary on Dang et al. (2024).

The results of Dang et al.'s recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that individuals diagnosed with other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) and those diagnosed with specified eating disorders (EDs, such as bulimia nervosa) endorse similar, elevated levels of ED-related cognitions (but not behaviors). The DSM has traditionally conceptualized EDs primarily as disturbances in eating behavior, and the diagnostic boundaries for EDs are based on objective markers, such as behavioral frequencies and weight. Although focusing on objective markers for ED diagnoses and severity indices has advantages (e.g., clinical communication, measurement), pitfalls include diagnostic migration and low emphasis on ED cognitions. Dang et al.'s findings provide a basis for rethinking DSM's conceptualization of EDs as primarily behavioral. This commentary discusses the potential merits and challenges of emphasizing subjective cognitions when assigning ED diagnoses. We explore how objective markers (e.g., behavioral frequency, weight) and subjective experience (e.g., fear of weight gain) may be balanced to improve the clinical utility of ED diagnoses. In all, research that more deeply phenotypes the subjective experiences of people with EDs across contexts, identities, and cultures will enrich our understanding of eating pathology and may inform diagnostic revisions.

Descriptives and genetic correlates of eating disorder diagnostic transitions and presumed remission in the Danish registry.

Eating disorders (EDs) are serious psychiatric disorders with an estimated 3.3 million healthy life-years lost worldwide yearly. Understanding the course of illness, diagnostic transitions and remission, and their associated genetic correlates could inform both ED etiology and treatment. The authors investigated occurrences of ED transitions and presumed remission and their genetic correlates as captured by polygenic scores (PGSs) in a large Danish register-based cohort. The sample compromised of 10,565 individuals with a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), or eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) with at least two registered hospital contacts between 1995 and 2018. Based on medical records, occurrence of diagnostic transitions and periods of presumed remission were identified. Associations between 422 PGS and diagnostic transitions and presumed remission were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. A minority of ED cases (14.1%-23.1%) experienced a diagnostic transition. Presumed remission ranged between 86.9%-89.8%. Higher (one SD increase) PGS for major depressive disorder and multisite chronic pain were positively associated with transitioning from AN to either BN or EDNOS. Higher PGS on a measure of body fat percentage and financial difficulties were positively associated with presumed remission from AN. Higher PGS for mood swings was positively associated with presumed remission from EDNOS whereas higher PGS for health rating showed the opposite. The authors found that most ED patients did not experience diagnostic transitions but were more likely to experience a period of presumed remission. Both diagnostic transitions and presumed remission have significant polygenic component.

Eating Disorder Treatment Access in the United States: Perceived Inequities Among Treatment Seekers.

Although eating disorders are associated with high rates of psychological and physical impairments and mortality, only about 20% of individuals with eating disorders receive treatment. No study has comprehensively assessed treatment access for those with these disorders in the United States. The authors examined access to eating disorder treatments and how it might vary among some populations. Seekers of treatment for eating disorders (N=1,995) completed an online assessment of clinical demographic and anthropometric characteristics, barriers to eating disorder treatment access, and eating disorder symptomatology. Analyses were conducted to identify treatment access barriers, compare barriers to treatment access across demographic groups, and investigate relationships between barriers to treatment access and eating disorder symptoms. Financial barriers (e.g., lack of insurance coverage) were the most frequently reported barrier to treatment access. Participants with historically underrepresented identities and with a diagnosis of other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) reported more barriers related to financial challenges, geographic location, eating disorder identification, sociocultural factors, and treatment quality compared with those with historically represented identities (e.g., White and cisgender persons). Higher frequencies of reported barriers to treatment access were associated with more severe eating disorder symptoms and poorer illness trajectories. Financial barriers were the most significant impediment to accessing treatment among individuals seeking eating disorder treatment. Barriers to treatment access disproportionally affected underrepresented groups and those with an OSFED diagnosis.

Exposures during pregnancy and at birth are associated with the risk of offspring eating disorders.

Eating disorders (ED) are severe psychiatric disorders, commonly debuting early. Aberrances in the intrauterine environment and at birth have been associated with risk of ED. Here, we explore if, and at what effect size, a variety of such exposures associate with offspring ED, that is, anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). This population-based cohort study, conducted from September 2021 to August 2023, used Finnish national registries of all live births in 1996-2014 (N = 1,097,753). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare ED risk in exposed versus unexposed offspring, adjusting for potential confounders and performing sex-stratified analyses. A total of 6614 offspring were diagnosed with an ED; 3668 AN, 666 BN, and 4248 EDNOS. Lower risk of offspring AN was seen with young mothers, continued smoking, and instrumental delivery, while higher risk was seen with older mothers, inflammatory disorders, prematurity, small for gestational age, and low Apgar. Offspring risk of BN was higher with continued smoking and prematurity, while lower with postmature birth. Offspring risk of EDNOS was lower with instrumental delivery, higher for older mothers, polycystic ovary syndrome, insulin-treated pregestational diabetes, antibacterial treatment, prematurity, and small for gestational age. Sex-specific associations were found. Several prenatal and at birth exposures are associated with offspring ED; however, we cannot exclude confounding by maternal BMI. Nevertheless, several exposures selectively associate with risk of either AN, BN, or EDNOS, and some are sex-specific, emphasizing the importance of subtype- and sex-stratified analyses of ED. We define environmental factors involved in the development of different ED, of importance as preventive measure, but also in order to aid in defining the molecular pathways involved and thus in the longer perspective contribute to the development of pharmacological treatment of ED.

HSE National Clinical Programme for Eating Disorders in Ireland: COVID-19 pandemic and eating disorder care in a new national eating disorder service.

The COVID-19 pandemic experience was different in each country (e.g., prevalence, societal restrictions). There is limited data on eating disorder (ED) diagnosis and service activity trends within Ireland. The aim of this study is to describe the ED referral and hospitalization trends during COVID-19 in Ireland. Monthly data (2019-2021) from three regional community ED services (two-child and one-adult) were collected. National psychiatric and medical hospitalization data were analyzed. A descriptive and trend analysis was performed. There was a trend of referrals to community ED services during the COVID-19 pandemic for children (p < .0001) and adults (p = .0019). Albeit the increase in child referrals was evident at an earlier point before adult referrals. There was a trend of a diagnosis for children and adults of anorexia nervosa (p < .0001; p = .0257) and other-specified-feeding-or-eating-disorder (OSFED) respectively (p = .0037; p = .0458). There was no trend in psychiatric co-morbidity. There was a trend of child (p = .0003) not adult (n = 0.1669) psychiatric hospitalization. There was a trend of medical hospitalization for child and adult combined (p < .0001). This study adds to the growing literature on the association of the COVID-19 pandemic on ED trends and the need for future public health and service provision funding to be allocated for mental health services during periods of international crisis. This study illustrates the referral and hospitalization trend in young persons and adults with an ED in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study highlights that there was a trend of Anorexia Nervosa and OSFED presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impairments among DSM-5 eating disorders: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.

Previous research revealed that people who did not meet full DSM-IV criteria for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), or binge-eating disorder (BED) but met criteria for eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) display high levels of psychiatric and physical morbidity commensurate with full criteria eating disorders. The DSM-5 introduced significant changes to eating disorder diagnostic criteria, so the present study aimed to determine whether the revised diagnostic criteria better distinguish between full criteria eating disorders, and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) and unspecified feeding or eating disorder (UFED). We present a series of meta-analyses comparing eating pathology, general psychopathology, and physical health impairments among those with AN, BN, and BED, compared to those with OSFED or UFED (n=69 eligible studies). Results showed significantly more eating pathology in OSFED compared to AN, no difference in general psychopathology, and greater physical health impairments in AN. BN had greater eating pathology and general psychopathology than OSFED, but OSFED showed more physical health impairments. No differences were found between BN and purging disorder or low-frequency BN, or between BED and OSFED. Findings highlight the clinical severity of OSFED and suggest the DSM-5 criteria may not appropriately account for these presentations.

Eating Disorders Among Primary Health Care Attendees in Jeddah city, Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Saudi Arabia

Introduction: An eating disorder refers to states in which food and nourishment have a manipulative role in regulating the body's appearance. The most common forms are anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and eating disorders not otherwise specified (ED-NOS). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors associated with eating disorders among Saudi attendees of PHCCs in Jeddah city during 2006. Objectives of the research: To estimate the prevalence of eating disorders among Saudi attendees of PHCCs in Jeddah and to identify risk factors associated with eating disorders in Jeddah city. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional analytic study among PHC attendees of the Ministry of Health in Jeddah city starting from August 2006 up to January 2007. It included Saudi males and females aged 15-45 attending the selected centers. A sample size of at least 267 individuals was estimated. Multi-stage sampling was used to ensure representativeness. (Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food) (SCOFF), and eating disorder screen for primary care questionnaires (ESP) were the tools used for data collection. Results: The prevalence of eating disorders among the study population was 13.7Percentage using ESP and 8.9Percentage using the SCOFF questionnaire. The prevalence of eating disorders using the ESP questionnaire was 7.6Percentage among men and 19.5Percentage among women. While using the SCOFF questionnaire, the prevalence was 6.1Percentage among men and 11.6Percentage among women. There was a significant association between eating disorders and a history of abuse, eating alone, and considering oneself thin (P- value= 0.001, 0.00, and 0.008, respectively). Conclusion: The prevalence of eating disorders in Jeddah is comparable to prevalence rates reported by studies in western societies and somewhat higher than what has been reported in the region.

Associations between parental socioeconomic-, family-, and sibling status and risk of eating disorders in offspring in a Danish national female cohort.

ObjectiveStudies on parental socioeconomic status (SES) and family risk factors for eating disorders (EDs) have yielded inconsistent results; however, several studies have identified high parental educational attainment as a risk factor. The aim was to evaluate associations of parental SES and family composition with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and eating disorders not otherwise specified (EDNOS) in the offspring, adjusting for parental age and parental mental health.MethodsThe cohort included women born in Denmark between January 1, 1989 and December 31, 2010, derived from Danish national registers. Each person was followed from their sixth birthday until onset of the disorder of interest or to December 31, 2016. Exposure variables were: childhood SES, defined as individually evaluated parental level of income, occupation, and education; sibling status; and family composition. Outcomes were: AN, BN, EDNOS, and major depressive disorder (MDD), included as a psychiatric comparison disorder. Risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazards.ResultsHigh parental SES was associated with increased risk of especially AN, and less so BN and EDNOS, in offspring. In comparison, low SES was associated with a higher risk of MDD. No differences between maternal or paternal socioeconomic risk factors were found. Family composition and sibling status showed limited influence on ED risk.DiscussionSES shows opposite associations with AN than MDD, whereas associations with BN and EDNOS are intermediate. The socioeconomic backdrop of AN differs markedly from that reported in other psychiatric disorders. Whether that is due to genetic and/or environmental factors remains unknown.Public Significance statementParental socioeconomic background (SES) may influence eating disorders risk in offspring somewhat differently than other psychiatric disorders. In Denmark, higher parental SES was associated with increased risk of, particularly, anorexia nervosa (AN). Importantly AN does strike across the SES spectrum. We must ensure that individuals of all backgrounds have equal access to care and are equally likely to be detected and treated appropriately for eating disorders.

When Implemented During the Recovery Phase, Can Mindful Eating and/or Intuitive Eating Reduce the Symptomatology of Eating Disorders?

ObjectivesThis review aims to determine the effect of mindful eating (ME) and intuitive eating (IE) interventions during recovery on the symptomatology of eating disorders (EDs), including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS).MethodsPeer-reviewed research articles were obtained from Medline, Academic Search Ultimate, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, ERIC, Science Reference Center, and CINAHL Complete between 2000 and 2020. Searches were conducted using Boolean operators to combine keywords and multiple variants of each word. The initial search resulted in 584 articles. After duplicates were removed and abstracts reviewed, 55 articles were read in full, nine of which were deemed appropriate for this review. An additional source was found through searching reference pages, authors’ names, and Google Scholar. A total of ten studies examining the effect of an IE or ME treatment on clinically diagnosed AN, BN, BED or EDNOS were included.ResultsTen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three cross-sectional studies that observed the association between IE and the presence of an ED or recovery found IE to be negatively correlated with ED symptomatology (p < 0.001). Additionally, two experimental studies that used IE as the treatment found a significant reduction in ED symptomatology (p < 0.001) and significant increases in IE-scale scores from pre- to post-treatment (p < 0.001). Another two experimental studies found using ME as the treatment resulted in a significant reduction of ED symptomatology (p < 0.001). Finally, three studies that included IE or ME as part of a larger intervention, but not as an independent treatment, showed a reduction in ED symptomatology (p < 0.01).ConclusionsDue to the cross-sectional and experimental nature of the study designs included in this review, more research is needed to conclude that IE or ME can reduce ED symptomatology. However, these articles present promising preliminary results to suggest that IE and ME can be an important part of an effective ED recovery both as an independent treatment or as part of a larger intervention.Funding SourcesNone.

Examining predictors of menstrual irregularity among women receiving outpatient treatment for an eating disorder: Psychiatric diagnosis, age of onset, physical, and psychological symptoms

Menstrual irregularities have been documented in patients with an eating disorder. The aim of this study was to examine the occurrence of menstrual irregularities in women who presented for outpatient treatment of an eating disorder, whether these differed across eating disorder diagnoses, and whether age of onset of the illness, body mass index (BMI), or psychological symptoms of the eating disorder were predictors of menstrual irregularity. A retrospective chart review of the files of 87 adults who presented for outpatient care for an eating disorder was conducted. Over half (58.3%) of women presenting for outpatient treatment had menstrual irregularities. Women with a diagnosis of other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) were more likely to experience menstrual irregularities. Age of onset of the illness and Drive for Thinness were significant predictors of experiencing menstrual irregularities. Menstrual irregularities are common in women presenting for outpatient treatment of an eating disorder. Age of onset of the illness and psychological symptoms may play a role in the development of menstrual irregularities in women with an eating disorder. There is a need for eating disorder clinicians to regularly follow-up with women about their reproductive health, regardless of their physical health status or eating disorder diagnosis. • Over half of women with an eating disorder experienced menstrual irregularities. • Women with OSFED were more likely to experience menstrual irregularities. • Age of onset of the eating disorder was associated with menstrual irregularity. • Drive for thinness was related to menstrual irregularity in women. • Women's reproductive health should be assessed in eating disorder treatment.

Gender Differences in Treatment Outcomes for Eating Disorders: A Case-Matched, Retrospective Pre-Post Comparison.

Eating disorders (EDs) are increasingly emerging as a health risk in men, yet men remain underrepresented in ED research, including interventional trials. This underrepresentation of men may have facilitated the development of women-centered ED treatments that result in suboptimal outcomes for men. The present study retrospectively compared pre- vs. post-treatment outcomes between age-, diagnosis-, and length-of-treatment-matched samples of n = 200 men and n = 200 women with Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), Binge Eating Disorder (BED), or Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS), treated in the same setting during the same period, and using the same measurements. Compared to women, men with AN showed marked improvements in weight gains during treatment as well as in ED-specific cognitions and general psychopathology. Likewise, men with BED showed marked weight loss during treatment compared to women with BED; ED-specific cognitions and general psychopathology outcomes were comparable in this case. For BN and EDNOS, weight, ED-specific cognitions, and general psychopathology outcomes remained largely comparable between men and women. Implications for treatments are discussed.

Adverse childhood experiences among adults with eating disorders: comparison to a nationally representative sample and identification of trauma profiles

BackgroundAdverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are prevalent, impact long-term physical and mental health, and are associated with eating disorders (EDs) in adulthood. The primary objectives of the current study were: (1) to examine and compare ACEs between two samples: treatment-seeking adults, and a nationally representative sample of adults, (2) to characterize ACEs items and total scores across demographic and diagnostic information in adults seeking treatment for an ED, (3) to statistically classify ACEs profiles using latent class analysis, and (4) to examine associations between ACEs profiles and diagnosis.MethodsThis cross-sectional study assessed patients with a DSM-5 ED receiving treatment between October 2018 and April 2020 at the inpatient, residential, or partial hospitalization levels of care at one of two private ED treatment facilities. ACEs were assessed with the Adverse Childhood Experiences Survey at admission. Generalized linear models and Welch’s t-tests were used to compare ACEs in the current sample with national estimates. A latent class analysis was conducted to examine subgroups of ACEs responses, and differences in these classes by ED diagnoses were examined with multinomial logistic regression.ResultsPatients with EDs had significantly higher ACEs scores (M = 1.95, SD = 1.90) than the nationally representative sample (M = 1.57, SD = 4.72; t = 6.42, p < .001). Within patients with EDs, four latent classes of ACEs item endorsement were identified. Patients with other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) and binge eating disorder (BED) were more likely to fall into the “Household ACEs” and “Abuse ACEs” groups, respectively, compared to anorexia nervosa—restricting subtype (AN-R).ConclusionsPatients with EDs reported more ACEs than the nationally representative sample, and differences in total ACEs and latent class membership were found across ED diagnoses. The current study can inform the development of trauma-informed care for patients with EDs.

Prevalence and characteristics of eating disorders among college students of a nonmetro city of Gujarat.

Context:There is a relative paucity of prevalence data about eating disorders (EDs) in India among young population.Aims:We aimed to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of EDs and abnormal eating behaviors among college students of a nonmetro city of Gujarat.Setting and Design:A cross-sectional survey was done among five colleges of a nonmetro city in Gujarat from February to September 2019.Subjects and Methods:Total 790 college students were assessed using a semi-structured format, Eating Attitudes Test-26, and Bulimic Investigatory Test Edinburgh followed by structured clinical interview as per DSM-5 criteria for EDs.Statistical Analysis:Outcomes were expressed in frequency, proportion, mean, and standard deviation. P values were calculated by Pearson Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test to determine the significance of the result.Results:The prevalence of abnormal eating behaviors was 25.2% (n = 199). Anorexia nervosa (AN) was not detected. The prevalence of bulimia nervosa (BN) was 0.2% and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) was 0.6%. “Being aware of calorie content” (53.7%) and “preoccupation with desire of thinness” (46.3%) were commonly found. “Impulse to vomit after meals” (2.5%) was least common. Lower body mass index was found among subjects with abnormal eating behavior. None of the subjects had amenorrhea.Conclusions:The prevalence of disordered eating behaviors, BN, and OSFED was 25.2%, 0.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. AN was not detected. OSFED was the most common ED and the characteristic “body image disturbance” was the most common symptom.

Impact of caloric prescriptions and degree of malnutrition on incidence of refeeding syndrome and clinical outcomes in patients with eating disorders: A retrospective review.

For individuals with eating disorders (EDs), medical stabilization is paramount for restoration of body weight. Careful nutritional rehabilitation minimizes risk of refeeding syndrome. Study's purpose: describe clinical outcomes of pediatric/adolescent patients with EDs treated with lower calorie (<1300 kcals/day, n = 137), higher calorie (≥1400 kcals/day, n = 154) diets. Retrospective chart reviews conducted for patients with known/suspected EDs. patients ages 12-21 years with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS), atypical anorexia nervosa (AtAN). patients with other EDs, co-morbid medical conditions. Demographic information, length of stay, anthropometrics, prior weight loss were recorded. Malnutrition classifications based on: %mBMI, BMI z-score, prior weight loss percentage. Laboratory data, electrolyte supplementations were collected. Initial calorie intake/calorie intake day 7 were recorded. No significant differences in age, admit weight, BMI, BMI z-score, %mBMI at admission, weight gain between the two groups. Six (4.4%) patients in lower calorie group, 4 (2.6%) in higher calorie group met criteria for severe refeeding syndrome based on ASPEN consensus recommendations (P = .52). Higher calorie group length of stay was significantly shorter than lower calorie group (P = .006). Shorter length of stay associated with increased calorie intake (P < .001), greater %mBMI (P < .001). Higher calorie prescriptions were not associated with different rates of hypomagnesia (P = 1) and hypokalemia (P = .34). There was significant increase in rate of hypophosphatemia in the lower calorie group versus the higher calorie group. Higher calorie diets were associated with decreased length of stay without impacting risk of refeeding syndrome.

Prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating in Western Asia: a systematic review and meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT This study aimed to systematically synthesize and appraise existing literature on the prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating in Western Asia. A systematic literature search of major English and Arabic databases, i.e., PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science and Scopus (English), Al-Manhal (Arabic) and grey literature was done to obtain the prevalence of disordered eating and eating disorders in Western Asia. The literature search was conducted on June 12th, 2020, and included papers from 1990–2020. Out of the 249 unduplicated original studies reviewed, 27 were included in the final meta-analysis. Data were then categorized according to the tools used to identify the presence of disordered eating or eating disorders. The pooled prevalence of disordered eating as solicited by both the Eating Attitudes Scale 26 and the Eating Attitudes Scale 40 (N = 11841) was 22.07%, the Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food Questionnaire (n = 3160) was 22.28% and the Eating Disorder Examination–Questionnaire (n = 425) was 7.95%. The pooled prevalence obtained from those studies using semi-structured interviews for anorexia nervosa (n = 118190) was 1.59%, bulimia nervosa (n = 118513) was 2.41% and the estimated prevalence of Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) (n = 118087) was 3.51%. Although the prevalence rate of eating disorders solicited using semi-structured interviews appeared to parallel the international range, the overall prevalence rate of disordered eating appeared to be slightly higher than the global rates of prevalence. A significant number of the suspected/detected cases of disordered eating appear to fulfill the criteria for EDNOS. This study is classified as evidence obtained from systematic reviews and meta-analyses (i.e. Level 1).

Using shape and weight overvaluation to empirically differentiate severity of other specified feeding or eating disorder

BackgroundAlthough no severity specifiers are noted in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – 5 for other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), shape/weight overvaluation is a proposed eating disorder (ED) severity specifier. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) Trees to empirically determine values of shape/weight overvaluation that differentiate OSFED severity. We additionally tested whether the SEM Tree-defined thresholds or a clinical cutoff for shape/weight overvaluation differentiated severity more meaningfully. MethodsParticipants were 690 females with OSFED presenting to residential ED treatment. SEM Tree analyses specified an outcome model of OSFED severity and then recursively partitioning the outcome model into severity groups. The SEM Tree-defined and clinical cutoff severity groups were compared on clinical characteristics. ResultsSEM Trees identified one split that occurred at value 5.12 on our shape/weight overvaluation items from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire. The subgroup with higher overvaluation had significantly greater intensity of ED and depressive symptoms and longer lengths of stay. The subgroups created from the shape/weight overvaluation clinical-cut off value of 4 differed on the same clinical characteristics as the SEM Tree-derived groups, with the exception of laxative use frequency. Effect sizes were larger for the clinical cutoff as compared to the SEM Tree severity specification scheme. LimitationsThese cross-sectional data were used from a predominately white and female residential treatment sample; this likely skewed the subgroups and may limit generalizability. ConclusionsShape/weight overvaluation can meaningfully differentiate OSFED severity. The clinical cutoff slightly outperformed the empirically determined thresholds for shape/weight overvaluation.

The hidden burden of eating disorders: an extension of estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

SummaryBackgroundAnorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are the only eating disorders included in the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019, yet binge-eating disorder and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) are more prevalent. This study sought to estimate the prevalence and burden of binge-eating disorder and OSFED globally and present a case for their inclusion in GBD.MethodsWe sourced studies from the GBD 2019 anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa epidemiological databases, two systematic reviews that included studies with epidemiological estimates of binge-eating disorder and OSFED, and experts in the field. Studies, published between Jan 1, 1998, and March 1, 2019, were included if they reported non-zero prevalence of two or more eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, or OSFED) and diagnosed cases according to DSM-IV or DSM-5. The proportions of total eating disorder cases that met diagnostic criteria for each individual eating disorder were estimated via network meta-regression and simulation using studies reporting eating disorder prevalence. The global cases unrepresented in GBD 2019 were estimated using the proportions from the simulation and the GBD 2019 eating disorder prevalence. Disability weights for binge-eating disorder and OSFED were then estimated along with disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Estimates are presented with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).Findings54 studies, of which 36 were from high-income countries, were included in the analysis. The number of global eating disorder cases in 2019 that were unrepresented in GBD 2019 was 41·9 million (95% UI 27·9–59·0), and consisted of 17·3 million (11·3–24·9) people with binge-eating disorder and 24·6 million (14·7–39·7) people with OSFED (vs 13·6 million [10·2–17·5] people with eating disorders in GBD 2019). Together, binge-eating disorder and OSFED caused 3·7 million (95% UI 2·0–6·5) DALYs globally, bringing the total eating disorder DALYs to 6·6 million (3·8–10·6) in 2019.InterpretationBinge-eating disorder and OSFED accounted for the majority of eating disorder cases and DALYs globally. These findings warrant the inclusion of binge-eating disorder and OSFED in future iterations of GBD, which will bring the burden experienced by people living with these disorders to the attention of policy makers with the means to target this burden.FundingQueensland Health, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Association between anorexia nervosa and other specified eating or feeding disorders and paranoia in adolescents: what factors are involved?

In eating disorders, the association with other psychiatric symptoms is of particular interest. The association between anorexia nervosa and psychotic symptoms is less studied than that with affective disorders (anxiety/depression). The aim of this study is to describe a psychotic symptom (paranoia) in adolescents with anorexia nervosa looking at several potential explicative associated factors: eating disorder symptoms, body image concerns, depression and social anxiety. Our hypothesis is that paranoia in anorexia nervosa patients is better explained by the concomitant depression and social anxiety symptoms than the core symptoms of the disease (eating disorder symptoms or body image concerns). This is a retrospective study. Consecutive, help-seeking adolescents, admitted to the Eating Disorder Service of the Integrated Pediatric Care Department, Luigi Vanvitelli University Hospital, constituted the sample. Data was obtained through retrospective collection of clinical interviews and self-report questionnaires, used for the routine assessment of these patients, administered by trained and expert child and adolescent psychiatrists, they were the Eating Attitude Test-26 (EAT-26), the Body Uneasiness Test-A (BUT-A), the Children Depression Inventory (CDI), the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA) and the paranoia subscale of the Specific Psychotic Experiences Questionnaire (SPEQ). We obtained data from 92 adolescents with anorexia nervosa and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Our regression model explained that paranoia (SPEQ-paranoia subscale) in this population was better explained by depression (CDI) (coefficient= 0.415 SD: 0.210, p=0.052) and social anxiety symptoms (LSAS-CA) (coefficient= 0.253 SD: 0.060; p<0.001) than eating disorder symptoms (EAT-26) (coefficient= 0.092 SD: 0.107; p=0.398) and body image concerns (BUT-A) (coefficient= 1.916 SD: 2.079; p=0.359). This study has some theoretical, clinical and treatment implications. It is important to carrying out screening for the presence of psychotic symptoms in patients with eating or feeding disorders. These symptoms and associated factors (depression and social anxiety) may complicate the clinical picture of the disease with the need, in certain cases, of psychopharmacological drugs and, among these, anti-psychotics. Finally in the psychotherapy context, paranoid ideas may be subject of treatment for patient with anorexia nervosa.

Drive for thinness provides an alternative, more meaningful, severity indicator than the DSM-5 severity indices for eating disorders.

To assess an alternative trans-diagnostic indicator for severity based on drive for thinness (DT) for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), and other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), and to compare this new approach to the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) severity categories for EDs. A total of 2,811 ED [428 AN-restrictive (AN-R), 313 AN-binge purging (AN-BP), 1,340 BN, 329 BED, 154 OSFED/atypical AN (AT), and 223 OSFED/purging disorder (PD)] patients were classified using: (a) The DSM-5 severity categories and (b) a DT categorisation. These severity classifications were then compared based on ED symptoms, general psychopathology, personality, and impulsive behaviours. For the DSM-5 categories, most ED patients fell into the 'mild' to 'moderate' categories. Using the DT categories, AN patients were mainly represented in the 'low' DT category, and BN, OSFED/AT, and PD in the 'high' DT category. The clinically significant findings were stronger for the DT than the DSM-5 severity approach (medium-to-large effect sizes). AN-BP and AN-R provided the most pronounced effects. Our findings question the clinical value of the DSM-5 severity categorisation, and provide initial support for an alternative DT severity approach for AN. HIGHLIGHTS : This study assessed an alternative trans-diagnostic drive for thinness (DT) severity. Category for all eating disorder (ED) sub-types, and then compared this to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) severity indices for EDs. ED symptoms, general psychopathology, personality, and impulsive behaviours were assessed using both classifications in a total of 2,811 female patients diagnosed with EDs. Clinically significant findings were stronger for the DT than the DSM-5 severity category (medium-to-large effect sizes); there was differentiation of the anorexia nervosa (AN) patients into mainly 'low' DT, and bulimia nervosa (BN) spectrum patients into mainly 'high' DT, vs. most patients were clustered in the 'mild-to-moderate' DSM-5 categories. Our findings provide initial support for an alternative trans-diagnostic DT severity category that may be more clinically meaningful than the DSM-5 severity indices for EDs.

COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES): Analysis of the impact of confinement in eating disorders and obesity-A collaborative international study.

Confinement during the COVID‐19 pandemic is expected to have a serious and complex impact on the mental health of patients with an eating disorder (ED) and of patients with obesity. The present manuscript has the following aims: (1) to analyse the psychometric properties of the COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES), (2) to explore changes that occurred due to confinement in eating symptomatology; and (3) to explore the general acceptation of the use of telemedicine during confinement. The sample comprised 121 participants (87 ED patients and 34 patients with obesity) recruited from six different centres. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) tested the rational‐theoretical structure of the CIES. Adequate goodness‐of‐fit was obtained for the confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach alpha values ranged from good to excellent. Regarding the effects of confinement, positive and negative impacts of the confinement depends of the eating disorder subtype. Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and with obesity endorsed a positive response to treatment during confinement, no significant changes were found in bulimia nervosa (BN) patients, whereas Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) patients endorsed an increase in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology. Furthermore, AN patients expressed the greatest dissatisfaction and accommodation difficulty with remote therapy when compared with the previously provided face‐to‐face therapy. The present study provides empirical evidence on the psychometric robustness of the CIES tool and shows that a negative confinement impact was associated with ED subtype, whereas OSFED patients showed the highest impairment in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology.