Eastern Margin Of Gondwanaland Research Articles

Possible tectonic patterns along the eastern margin of Gondwanaland from numerical studies of mantle convection

Two end-member scenarios have been proposed for the tectonic situation along the eastern margins of Gondwanaland before Zealandia was formed ca. 100 million years ago (Ma), namely: (1) A subduction zone located far from the eastern margin of Zealandia, wherein Zealandia may have separated from Gondwanaland by plume push of an active hotspot plume.; (2) A subduction zone located along the eastern margin of Gondwanaland, wherein Zealandia possibly separated from Gondwanaland via trench/subduction retreat. Assuming that the thermal structure of the deep mantle and source of hotspot plumes remained relatively stationary over the last hundred million years, major hotspot plumes with a large buoyancy flux did not exist under Zealandia; the eastern margins of Gondwanaland were far from two large low-shear-velocity provinces under the Africa–Atlantic and South Pacific regions. Herein, through numerical studies of three-dimensional global mantle convection, we examined the mantle convection and surface tectonic patterns at ~100 Ma. The present model considered the real configuration of Gondwanaland at the model surface to observe long-term variations of mantle convection and the resulting surface tectonic conditions. The results demonstrate that the extensive subduction zones developed preferentially along the eastern margin of Gondwanaland when the temperature anomaly of the lower mantle was primarily dominated by high-temperature regions under present-day Africa–Atlantic and South Pacific regions. The results of this study support one of the proposed hypotheses, where the breakup at the eastern margins of Gondwanaland at ~100 Ma occurred via trench/subduction retreat.

Molecular phylogeny of osteoglossoids: a new model for Gondwanian origin and plate tectonic transportation of the Asian arowana.

One of the traditional enigmas in freshwater zoogeography has been the evolutionary origin of Scleropages formosus inhabiting Southeast Asia (the Asian arowana), which is a species threatened with extinction among the highly freshwater-adapted fishes from the order Osteoglossiformes. Dispersalists have hypothesized that it originated from the recent (the Miocene or later) transmarine dispersal of morphologically quite similar Australasian arowanas across Wallace's Line, but this hypothesis has been questioned due to their remarkable adaptation to freshwater. We determined the complete nucleotide sequences of two mitochondrial protein genes from 12 osteoglossiform species, including all members of the suborder Osteoglossoidei, with which robust molecular phylogeny was constructed and divergence times were estimated. In agreement with previous morphology-based phylogenetic studies, our molecular phylogeny suggested that the osteoglossiforms diverged from a basal position of the teleostean lineage, that heterotidines (the Nile arowana and the pirarucu) form a sister group of osteoglossines (arowanas in South America, Australasia, and Southeast Asia), and that the Asian arowana is more closely related to Australasian arowanas than to South American ones. However, molecular distances between the Asian and Australasian arowanas were much larger than expected from the fact that they are classified within the same genus. By using the molecular clock of bony fishes, tested for its good performance for rather deep divergences and calibrated using some reasonable assumptions, the divergence between the Asian and Australasian arowanas was estimated to date back to the early Cretaceous. Based on the molecular and geological evidence, we propose a new model whereby the Asian arowana vicariantly diverged from the Australasian arowanas in the eastern margin of Gondwanaland and migrated into Eurasia on the Indian subcontinent or smaller continental blocks. This study also implicates the relatively long absence of osteoglossiform fossil records from the Mesozoic.

Evidence from U–Pb zircon and 40Ar/39Ar muscovite detrital mineral ages in metasandstones for movement of the Torlesse suspect terrane around the eastern margin of Gondwanaland

New U–Pb detrital zircon ages from Triassic metasandstones of the Torlesse Terrane in New Zealand are compared with 40Ar/39Ar muscovite data and together, reveal four main source components: (i) major, Triassic–Permian (210–270 Myr old) and (ii) minor, Permian–Carboniferous (280–350 Myr old) granitoids (recorded in zircon and muscovite data); (iii) minor, early middle Palaeozoic, metamorphic rocks, recorded mainly by muscovite, 420–460 Myr old, and (iv) minor, Late Precambrian–Cambrian igneous and metamorphic complexes, 480–570 Myr old, recorded by zircon only. There are also Proterozoic zircon ages with no clear grouping (580–1270 Myr). The relative absence of late Palaeozoic (350–420 Myr old) components excludes granitoid terranes in the southern Lachlan Fold Belt (Australia) and its continuation into North Victoria Land (East Antarctica) and Marie Byrd Land (West Antarctica) as a potential source for the Torlesse. The age data are compatible with derivation from granitoid terranes of the northern New England Orogen (and hinterland) in NE Australia. This confirms that the Torlesse Terrane of New Zealand is a suspect terrane, that probably originated at the NE Australian, Permian–Triassic, Gondwanaland margin and then (200–120 Ma) moved 2500 km southwards to its present New Zealand position by the Late Cretaceous (90 Ma). This sense of movement is analogous to that suggested for Palaeozoic Mesozoic terranes at the North American Pacific margin.

Paleozoic intraplate escape tectonics in Gondwanaland and major strike-slip duplication in the Lachlan orogen of southeastern Australia

Intraplate tectonic escape along the eastern margin of Gondwanaland in Late Silurian to Middle Devonian time was caused by the eastward movement of Antarctica along a major intraplate tear. Resulting collisions caused a crustal block from the southern part of the Lachlan orogen of southeastern Australia to become detached from its lower lithosphere and escape to the northwest as a crustal flake. This escaping block then became incorporated into the western part of the Lachlan orogen as a separate terrane.

Reconstruction of eastern Gondwanaland

Substantial additions of large continental blocks to the Smith et al.1 model of eastern Gondwanaland are proposed here largely on the basis of the distribution of key land floras, tropical and subtropical marine faunas, lithofacies patterns and the identification of a Triassic magmatic arc that characterized all the eastern margin of Gondwanaland. The continental fragments that must have been rifted from northern Australia–New Guinea in the Jurassic are identified as south Tibet–Burma–Thailand–Malaya and Sumatra. The original site of deposition of the subtropical Permian limestones and tropical late Triassic limestones, overthrust onto the northern margin of Australia by the late Cenozoic collision2, is located in this greater Gondwanaland. Palaeomagnetic data, except those from Malaya3, support this reconstruction.