Early Vasopressor Use Research Articles

What is confirmed in the treatment of sepsis? : An update

Sepsis is defined as "being evoked as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an inadequate host response to infection". The most recent German S3 guidelines were published in 2018 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) last published the current recommendations for the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in 2021. This article explores and discusses which evidence in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock has been confirmed. Discussion of the 2018 German S3 guidelines, supplementation of the content of the 2021 international guidelines and recent research results since 2021. The primary objective for managing sepsis and septic shock still includes rapid identification, early initiation of anti-infective treatment, and focus cleansing when feasible. In addition, the focus is on hemodynamic stabilization, including the early use of vasopressors for prevention of hypervolemia and, if necessary, the use of organ support procedures. Supportive treatment, such as the administration of corticosteroids and the use of apheresis, can be advantageous in specific scenarios. The focus is increasingly shifting towards post-intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up care, improving the quality of life after surviving sepsis and the close involvement of relatives of the patient. Despite the fact that considerable progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis, the early administration of anti-infective agents, focus control, nuanced volume therapy and the use of catecholamines continue to be fundamental to sepsis management. New recommendations emphasize the early use of vasopressors (primarily norepinephrine) and the administration of corticosteroids, especially in cases of septic shock and pneumonia.

Should we initiate vasopressors earlier in patients with septic shock: A mini systemic review.

Septic shock treatment remains a major challenge for intensive care units, despite the recent prominent advances in both management and outcomes. Vasopressors serve as a cornerstone of septic shock therapy, but there is still controversy over the timing of administration. Specifically, it remains unclear whether vasopressors should be used early in the course of treatment. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the timing of vasopressor administration. Research was systematically identified through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane searching according to PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The pathophysiological basis for early vasopressor use was classified, with the exploration on indications for the early administration of mono-vasopressors or their combination with vasopressin or angiotensinII. We found that mortality was 28.1%-47.7% in the early vasopressors group, and 33.6%-54.5% in the control group. We also investigated the issue of vasopressor responsiveness. Furthermore, we acknowledged the subsequent challenge of administration of high-dose norepinephrine via peripheral veins with early vasopressor use. Based on the literature review, we propose a possible protocol for the early initiation of vasopressors in septic shock resuscitation.

Early Empiric Antibiotic Use in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

To investigate temporal trends and outcomes associated with early antibiotic prescribing in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) database. Sixty-six health systems throughout the United States that were contributing to the N3C database. Centers that had fewer than 500 admissions in their dataset were excluded. Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were included. Patients were defined to have early antibiotic use if they received at least 3 calendar days of intravenous antibiotics within the first 5 days of admission. None. Of 322,867 qualifying first hospitalizations, 43,089 patients received early empiric antibiotics. Antibiotic use declined across all centers in the data collection period, from March 2020 (23%) to June 2022 (9.6%). Average rates of early empiric antibiotic use (EEAU) also varied significantly between centers (deviance explained 7.33% vs 20.0%, p < 0.001). Antibiotic use decreased slightly by day 2 of hospitalization and was significantly reduced by day 5. Mechanical ventilation before day 2 (odds ratio [OR] 3.57; 95% CI, 3.42-3.72), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before day 2 (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.75-2.61), and early vasopressor use (OR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.78-1.93) but not region of residence was associated with EEAU. After propensity matching, EEAU was associated with an increased risk for in-hospital mortality (OR 1.27; 95% CI, 1.23-1.33), prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.50-1.82), late broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure (OR 3.24; 95% CI, 2.99-3.52), and late Clostridium difficile infection (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.37-1.87). Although treatment of COVID-19 patients with empiric antibiotics has declined during the pandemic, the frequency of use remains high. There is significant inter-center variation in antibiotic prescribing practices and evidence of potential harm. Our findings are hypothesis-generating and future work should prospectively compare outcomes and adverse events.

Clinical outcomes after a single induction dose of etomidate versus ketamine for emergency department sepsis intubation: a randomized controlled trial

Patients with sepsis often require emergency intubation. In emergency departments (EDs), rapid-sequence intubation with a single-dose induction agent is standard practice, but the best choice of induction agent in sepsis remains controversial. We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial in the ED. We included septic patients who were aged at least 18 years and required sedation for emergency intubation. Patients were randomly assigned by a blocked randomization to receive 0.2–0.3 mg/kg of etomidate or 1–2 mg/kg of ketamine for intubation. The objectives were to compare the survival outcomes and adverse events after intubation between etomidate and ketamine. Two hundred and sixty septic patients were enrolled; 130 patients/drug arm whose baseline characteristics were well balanced at baseline. In the etomidate group, 105 patients (80.8%) were alive at 28 days, compared with 95 patients (73.1%) in the ketamine group (risk difference [RD], 7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 2.5 to 17.9%; P = 0.092). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived at 24 h (91.5% vs. 96.2%; P = 0.097) and survived at 7 days (87.7% vs. 87.7%; P = 0.574). A significantly higher proportion of the etomidate group needed a vasopressor within 24 h after intubation: 43.9% vs. 17.7%, RD, 26.2% (95% CI, 15.4 to 36.9%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, there were no differences in early and late survival rates between etomidate and ketamine. However, etomidate was associated with higher risks of early vasopressor use after intubation. Trial registration: The trial protocol was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (identification number: TCTR20210213001). Registered 13 February 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/export/pdf/TCTR20210213001.

Special maternal care bundle to attenuate post-spinal hypotension in cesarean section: A randomized controlled clinical trial

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a special maternal care bundle as an alternative technique for the attenuation of hypotension following spinal anesthesia in parturients scheduled for CS. Methods This double-blinded, parallel-group, randomized trial enrolled 138 adult parturients who were scheduled for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the care bundle group, 68 participants received a co-load of lactated Ringer’s solution and ondansetron infusion during administration of spinal anesthesia with a slow rate intrathecal bupivacaine injection and a V-shaped supine position. While in the best practice group, 70 participants received a co-loaded lactated Ringer’s solution during spinal anesthesia with early use of vasopressors and a left uterine tilting position. The primary outcome was the total ephedrine consumption. Secondary outcomes included the mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, atropine usage, complications such as dizziness, nausea, and vomiting, as well as the baby’s Apgar score. Results Special maternal care bundle significantly reduced the need and the total dose of ephedrine (P = 0.042). The mean arterial blood pressure was significantly less affected by maternal bundle care, but the reduction in heart rate, the need for atropine, the incidence of dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and the Apgar score were comparable in both groups. Conclusion The special maternal care bundle including co-load of lactated ringer, ondansetron 4 mg IV infusion, slow intrathecal injection and v-shaped positions can reduce the incidence of hypotension resulting from spinal anesthesia and ephedrine usage during CS.

Steuerung der Volumentherapie von Intensivpatienten: Neue Strategien und optimale Zielparameter?

Adequate therapy with intravenous fluids is crucial in the initial treatment of critically ill patients. Both hypovolemia and hypervolemia are associated with organ dysfunction and adverse outcomes. A recent international randomized trial investigated a restrictive volume management in comparison with a standard volume regimen. 90-day-mortality was not significantly reduced in the group with restrictive fluid administration. Instead of using a fixed fluid strategy - either restrictive or liberal - fluid therapy should be individualised: Adequate fluid application optimizes cardiac preload and tissue perfusion and avoids the harms of abundant volume therapy. Early use of vasopressors may facilitate the achievement of mean arterial pressure targets and minimize the risk of volume overload. Appropriate volume management requires evaluation of fluid status, knowledge of hemodynamic parameters and accurate testing of fluid responsiveness. Regarding the absence of evidence-based criterias and treatment goals for volume management in shock patients, an individualised approach resorting to diverse monitoring tools should be considered. UItrasound-based assessment of IVC diameter and echocardiography are excellent non-invasive tools to evaluate volume status. Passive leg raising (PLR) test represents a valid method for the assessment of volume responsiveness.

Predictive ability of severity scores and outcomes for mortality in kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 admitted to the intensive care unit: results from a Brazilian single-center cohort study.

Background:the predictive ability of severity scores for mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units is not well-known among kidney transplanted (KT) patients, especially those diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the predictive ability of severity scores for mortality in KT recipients.Methods:51 KT recipients with COVID-19 diagnosis were enrolled. The performance of the SOFA, SAPS 3, and APACHE IV tools in predicting mortality after COVID-19 was compared by the area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) and univariate Cox regression analysis was performed.Results:The 90-day cumulative incidence of death was 63.4%. Only APACHE IV score differed between survivors and nonsurvivors: 91.2±18.3 vs. 106.5±26.3, P = 0.03. The AUC- ROC of APACHE IV for predicting death was 0.706 (P = 0.04) and 0.656 (P = 0.06) at 7 and 90 days, respectively. Receiving a kidney from a deceased donor (HR = 3.16; P = 0.03), troponin levels at admission (HR for each ng/mL = 1.001; P = 0.03), APACHE IV score (HR for each 1 point = 1.02; P = 0.01), mechanical ventilation (MV) requirement (HR = 3.04; P = 0.002) and vasopressor use on the first day after ICU admission (HR = 3.85; P < 0.001) were associated with the 90-day mortality in the univariate analysis.Conclusion:KT recipients had high mortality, which was associated with type of donor, troponin levels, early use of vasopressors, and MV requirement. The other traditional severity scores investigated could not predict mortality.

Vasopressor Initiation Within 1 Hour of Fluid Loading Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Septic Shock Patients: Analysis of National Registry Data.

To investigate whether administration of a vasopressor within 1 hour of first fluid loading affected mortality and organ dysfunction in septic shock patients. Prospective, multicenter, observational study. Sixteen tertiary or university hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Patients with septic shock (n = 415) were classified into early and late groups according to whether the vasopressor was initiated within 1 hour of the first resuscitative fluid load. Early (n = 149) patients were 1:1 propensity matched to late (n = 149) patients. None. The median time from the initial fluid bolus to vasopressor was shorter in the early group (0.3 vs 2.3 hr). There was no significant difference in the fluid bolus volume within 6 hours (33.2 vs 35.9 mL/kg) between the groups. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and lactate level on day 3 in the ICU were significantly higher in the early group than that in the late group (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, 9.2 vs 7.7; lactate level, 2.8 vs 1.7 mmol/L). In multivariate Cox regression analyses, early vasopressor use was associated with a significant increase in the risk of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26-2.65). Vasopressor initiation within 1 hour of fluid loading was associated with higher 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.

Use of Vasopressors in Extremely Preterm Infants in First Week of Life.

A significant variability exists for diagnosis and treatment of hypotension in extremely preterm infants. Benefits of the use of vasopressors remain unclear. We wanted to identify the risk factors associated with use of vasopressors in the first week of life and their impact on outcomes of extremely preterm infants. Retrospective review of all newborns ≤28 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted in neonatal intensive care unit from October 1, 2012, to October 31, 2015, done. Data regarding antenatal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Study infants were divided into two cohorts and compared based on vasopressor use. Chi-square, t-test, and multiple logistic regression were performed as appropriate and significance set at p <0.05. Of 213 extremely preterm infants, 90 (42.3%) received vasopressors in first week of life. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) at admission in these infants was significantly lower than that of infants who did not require vasopressors (27 ± 8 vs. 30 ± 6 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Vasopressors were initiated within 24 hours in 91% of babies. After controlling for other variables, use of vasopressors was significantly higher in infants with lower birth weight (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-8.3), 5-minute Apgar's score ≤5 (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-3.12), and admission hypothermia (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3-4.9). The use of vasopressors was significantly associated with severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), even after controlling for other significant variables (OR: 5.9, 95% CI: 1.6-9.3). Lower birth weight, low 5-minute Apgar's score, and admission hypothermia are characteristics associated with early use of vasopressors in extremely preterm infants. Infants treated with vasopressors are at a higher risk of developing severe IVH. · Low systemic blood pressure is a very common problem in the extremely preterm population.. · In clinical practice, mean arterial blood pressure (BP) less than the infants GA in week is typically considered to be "low BP.". · About 50% of infants born at <29 weeks of GA received very preterm in the first week of life.. · Use of vasopressors is associated with a higher incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely preterm population..

Basic principles of ultrasound-assisted choice of strategy for targeted infusion therapy

Objective. Optimization of fluid therapy in emergency medicine.&#x0D; Materials and methods: 1) conceptual four-phase liquid resuscitation model; 2) conceptual approach of infusion therapy management is based on an assessment of the four main components of haemocirculation: a vascular content, tone and integrity, blood flow; 3) fast bedside ultrasound algorithm for differential diagnosis of shocks and infusion resuscitation protocol using ultrasound of the inferior vena cava (preload assessment) and lungs (early detection of extravascular fluid).&#x0D; Results. Using the selected methods, it is possible to clearly determine the optimal target-oriented infusion strategy depending on the volemic status and the state of hemodynamics, the parameters of which can be estimated using ultrasound: vascular content – inferior vena cava (caliber and breathing variations); vascular tone – caliber of the tibia artery; vascular integrity – loss assessment in the third space (physiological cavities and interstitium of the lungs); blood flow – Doppler Echo.&#x0D; Conclusions. The use of diagnostic ultrasound allows to optimize tissue perfusion, keeping the intravascular fluid volume in a certain range by sorting patients into three categories of fluid management: infusion resuscitation, tested infusion, limiting infusion and early use of vasopressors, which reduces the number of adverse effects and the incidence of complications.

Early vasopressor administration in pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury: An ATOMAC + study

BackgroundNo prior studies have examined the outcomes of early vasopressor use in children sustaining blunt liver or spleen injury (BLSI). MethodsA planned secondary analysis of vasopressor use from a 10-center, prospective study of 1004 children with BLSI. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compare patients given vasopressors <48 h after injury to controls based on pretreatment factors. A logistic regression was utilized to assess survival associated with vasopressor initiation factors on mortality and nonoperative management (NOM) failure. ResultsOf 1004 patients with BLSI, 128 patients were hypotensive in the Pediatric Trauma Center Emergency Department (ED); 65 total patients received vasopressors. Hypotension treated with vasopressors was associated with a sevenfold increase in mortality (AOR = 7.6 [p < 0.01]). When excluding patients first given vasopressors for cardiac arrest, the risk of mortality increased to 11-fold (AOR = 11.4 [p = 0.01]). All deaths in patients receiving vasopressors occurred when started within the first 12 h after injury. Vasopressor administration at any time was not associated with NOM failure. ConclusionAfter propensity matching, early vasopressor use for hypotension in the ED was associated with an increased risk of death, but did not increase the risk of failure of NOM. Level of evidenceLevel III prognostic and epidemiological, prospective.

Goal-directed hemodynamic management in patients undergoing primary debulking gynaecological surgery: A matched-controlled precision medicine study

BackgroundUsefulness of intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management (GDHM) for patients without comorbidities is debated. After clinical implementation of a pulse contour analysis-guided GDHM protocol, which foresees early vasopressor use for recruiting unstressed volume, we conducted a matched-controlled analysis to explore its impact on the amount of fluids intraoperatively administered to patients without comorbidities who underwent extended abdominal surgery for ovarian cancer. MethodsAfter 1:1 matching accounting for body mass index, oncologic disease severity and intraoperative blood losses, 22 patients treated according to this GDHM protocol were compared to a control group of 22 patients who had been managed according to the clinical decision of attending physicians, taken without advanced monitoring. Results are displayed as median[interquartile range]. ResultsAll analyzed patients underwent radical hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, bowel resection, peritonectomy and extended pelvic/periaortic lymphadenectomy; median length of surgery was 517[480–605] min in patients receiving GDHM and 507[480–600] min in control group. Intraoperatively, patients undergoing GDHM received less fluids (crystalloids 2950[2700–3300] vs. 5150[4700–6000] mL, p < 0.001; colloids 100[50–200] vs. 750[500–1000] mL, p < 0.001) and showed a trend to more frequent vasopressor administration (32 vs 9%, p = 0.13). Greater intraoperative diuresis (540[480–620] mL vs. 450[400–500] mL, p = 0.007), lower blood lactates at surgery end (1.5[1.1–2] vs. 4.1[3.3–5] mmol/L, p < 0.001), shorter time to bowel function recovery (1 [1, 2] vs. 4 [3–5] days, p < 0.001) and hospital discharge (7 [6–8] vs 12 [9–16] days, p < 0.0001) were detected in patients receiving GDHM. ConclusionsIn high-tumor load gynaecological patients without comorbidities who receive radical and prolonged surgery, intraoperative use of this novel GDHM protocol helped limit fluids administration with safety.

Characteristics, treatment and outcomes for all emergency department patients fulfilling criteria for septic shock: a prospective observational study.

Most published data on emergency department (ED) patients with septic shock have been generated from studies examining the effect of early protocolised resuscitation in selected cohorts. Consequently, these data do not generally represent patients falling outside trial inclusion criteria or judged unsuitable for aggressive treatment. Our aim was to determine the characteristics, treatment and outcomes for all ED patients fulfilling the criteria for septic shock. Septic shock patients were identified from a prospective database of consecutive ED patients admitted with infection. Descriptive data were compared with those from previous studies and associations between ED processes of care and mortality were determined. A total of 399 septic shock patients were identified, with a 30-day mortality of 19.5%. The median ED length of stay was 9.2 h. Rates of vasopressor use (22.6%) and ICU admission (37.3%) were low. Subgroups fulfilling the lactate criteria alone, hypotension criteria alone and both criteria represented distinct shock phenotypes with increasing severity of illness and mortality. Mortality for patients with limitations to treatment determined in the ED was 65.6% and 6.1% for those without limitations. Greater volumes of intravenous fluid and early vasopressor therapy for appropriate patients were associated with survival. Median length of stay over 9 hours may have enhanced identification of patients with limitations to treatment and fluid responders, reducing invasive therapies and ICU admissions. Distinct shock phenotypes were apparent, with implications for revision of septic shock definitions and future trial design. Liberal fluids and early vasopressor use in appropriate patients were associated with survival.

Review article: Sepsis in the emergency department - Part 3: Treatment.

Although comprehensive guidelines for treatment of sepsis exist, current research continues to refine and revise several aspects of management. Imperatives for rapid administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics for all patients with sepsis may not be supported by contemporary data. Many patients may be better served by a more judicious approach allowing consideration of investigation results and evidence-based guidelines. Conventional fluid therapy has been challenged with early evidence supporting balanced, restricted fluid and early vasopressor use. Albumin, vasopressin and hydrocortisone have each been shown to support blood pressure and reduce catecholamine requirements but without effect on mortality, and as such should be considered for ED patients with septic shock on a case-by-case basis. Measurement of quality care in sepsis should incorporate quality of blood cultures and guideline-appropriateness of antibiotics, as well as timeliness of therapy. Local audit is an essential and effective means to improve practice. Multicentre consolidation of data through agreed minimum sepsis data sets would provide baseline quality data, required for the design and evaluation of interventions.

Early vasopressor use following traumatic injury: a systematic review

ObjectivesCurrent guidelines suggest limiting the use of vasopressors following traumatic injury; however, wide variations in practice exist. Although excessive vasoconstriction may be harmful, these agents may help reduce administration of...

Fluid overload in children undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Patients admitted to an intensive care unit are prone to cumulated fluid overload and receive intravenous volumes through the aggressive resuscitation recommended for septic shock treatment, as well as other fluid sources related to medications and nutritional support. The liberal liquid supply strategy has been associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Although there are few prospective pediatric studies, new strategies are being proposed. This non-systematic review discusses the pathophysiology of fluid overload, its consequences, and the available therapeutic strategies. During systemic inflammatory response syndrome, the endothelial glycocalyx is damaged, favoring fluid extravasation and resulting in interstitial edema. Extravasation to the third space results in longer mechanical ventilation, a greater need for renal replacement therapy, and longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, among other changes. Proper hemodynamic monitoring, as well as cautious infusion of fluids, can minimize these damages. Once cumulative fluid overload is established, treatment with long-term use of loop diuretics may lead to resistance to these medications. Strategies that can reduce intensive care unit morbidity and mortality include the early use of vasopressors (norepinephrine) to improve cardiac output and renal perfusion, the use of a combination of diuretics and aminophylline to induce diuresis, and the use of sedation and early mobilization protocols.

Fluid therapy and perfusional considerations during resuscitation in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are consistently associated with morbidity and mortality among the critically ill or injured. Thus, avoiding or potentially treating these conditions may improve patient outcomes. With the aim of improving the outcomes for patients with IAH/ACS, the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome recently updated its clinical practice guidelines. In this article, we review the association between a positive fluid balance and outcomes among patients with IAH/ACS and how optimisation of fluid administration and systemic/regional perfusion may potentially lead to improved outcomes among this patient population.Evidence consistently associates secondary IAH with a positive fluid balance. However, despite increased research in the area of non-surgical management of patients with IAH and ACS, evidence supporting this approach is limited. Some evidence exists to support implementing goal-directed resuscitation protocols and restrictive fluid therapy protocols in shocked and recovering critically ill patients with IAH. Data from animal experiments and clinical trials has shown that the early use of vasopressors and inotropic agents is likely to be safe and may help reduce excessive fluid administration, especially in patients with IAH. Studies using furosemide and/or renal replacement therapy to achieve a negative fluid balance in patients with IAH are encouraging. The type of fluid to be administered in patients with IAH remains far from resolved. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of abdominal perfusion pressure as a resuscitation endpoint in patients with IAH. However, it is important to recognise that IAH either abolishes or increases threshold values for pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness, while the presence of IAH may also result in a false negative passive leg raising test.Correct fluid therapy and perfusional support during resuscitation form the cornerstone of medical management in patients with abdominal hypertension. Controlled studies determining whether the above medical interventions may improve outcomes among those with IAH/ACS are urgently required.

Vasopressor Use during Emergency Trauma Surgery

Most evidence suggests early vasopressor use is associated with death after trauma, but no previous study has focused on patients requiring emergency operative intervention (OR). We test the hypothesis that vasopressors are harmful in this population. Records from 746 patients requiring OR from July 2009 to March 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and stratified based on vasopressor use (epinephrine [EPI], phenylephrine, ephedrine, norepinephrine, dobutamine, vasopressin) or no vasopressor use. Vasopressors were administered to 225 patients (30%) during OR; 59 patients (8%) received multiple vasopressors. Patients who received vasopressors were older, more severely injured, had worse vital signs, and increased mortality rate (all P < 0.001). EPI was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio, 6.88; P = 0.001). If patients who received EPI were excluded, there was no difference in mortality between those who received vasopressors alone or in combination and those that did not (5 vs 6%, P = 0.523), although multiple markers of injury severity were worse. We conclude that vasopressor use is relatively common in the most severely injured patients requiring OR and is associated with mortality. EPI is most often used for cardiac arrest, whereas other vasopressors are used for their vasoconstrictive properties. This suggests that, except for EPI, vasopressors during OR are not independently associated with mortality.

Early Intensive Care Sedation Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

Choice and intensity of early (first 48 h) sedation may affect short- and long-term outcome. To investigate the relationships between early sedation and time to extubation, delirium, and hospital and 180-day mortality among ventilated critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Multicenter (25 Australia and New Zealand hospitals) prospective longitudinal (ICU admission to 28 d) cohort study of medical/surgical patients ventilated and sedated 24 hours or more. We assessed administration of sedative agents, ventilation time, sedation depth using Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS, four hourly), delirium (daily), and hospital and 180-day mortality. We used multivariable Cox regression to quantify relationships between early deep sedation (RASS, -3 to -5) and patients' outcomes. We studied 251 patients (mean age, 61.7 ± 15.9 yr; mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II score, 20.8 ± 7.8), with 21.1% (53) hospital and 25.8% (64) 180-day mortality. Over 2,678 study days, we completed 14,736 RASS assessments. Deep sedation occurred in 191 (76.1%) patients within 4 hours of commencing ventilation and in 171 (68%) patients at 48 hours. Delirium occurred in 111 (50.7%) patients with median (interquartile range) duration of 2 (1-4) days. After adjusting for diagnosis, age, sex, APACHE II, operative, elective, hospital type, early use of vasopressors, and dialysis, early deep sedation was an independent predictor of time to extubation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.94; P < 0.001), hospital death (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20; P = 0.01), and 180-day mortality (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16; P = 0.026) but not delirium occurring after 48 hours (P = 0.19). Early sedation depth independently predicts delayed extubation and increased mortality, making it a potential target for interventional studies.

Early Vasopressor Use in Critical Injury Is Associated With Mortality Independent From Volume Status

Early Vasopressor Use in Critical Injury Is Associated With Mortality Independent From Volume Status