Early Undifferentiated Arthritis Research Articles

Association between PYTPN22 rs2476601, VEGF rs833070, TNFAIP3 rs6920220 Polymorphisms and Risk for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Early Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients: A Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: About 40% of early undifferentiated arthritis (UA) progresses to rheumatoid (RA) or other chronic arthritis. Novel diagnostic tools predicting the risk for this progression are needed to identify the patients who would benefit from early aggressive treatment. Evidence on the role of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the development of RA has emerged. The aim of our study was to investigate the association between rs2476601, rs833070, and rs6920220 SNPs and UA progression to RA. Materials and Methods: Ninety-two UA patients were observed for 12 months. At study entry, demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, musculoskeletal ultrasonography was performed, and blood samples were drawn to investigate levels of inflammatory markers, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (anti-CCP)detect SNPs. After 12 months, UA outcomes were assessed, and patients were divided into two (RA and non-RA) groups. The association between the risk of progression to chronic inflammatory arthritis and analyzed SNPs was measured by computing odds ratios (OR). Results: After a 12-month follow-up, 27 (29.3%) patients developed RA, and 65 (70.7%) patients were assigned to the non-RA group. The arthritis of 21 patients (22.8%) from the non-RA group resolved completely, while the other 44 (47.2%) patients were diagnosed with another rheumatic inflammatory disease. The patients who developed RA had a significantly greater number of tender and swollen joints (p = 0.010 and p = 0.021 respectively) and were more frequently RF or anti-CCP (p < 0.001), and both RF and anti-CCP positive (p < 0.001) at the baseline as compared with the patients in the non-RA group. No significant association between rs2476601 (OR = 0.99, p = 0.98), rs833070 (OR = 1.0, p = 0.97), and rs6920220 (OR = 0.48, p = 0.13) polymorphisms and the risk of developing RA were found. Conclusions: No association between analyzed SNPs and a greater risk to progress from UA to RA was confirmed, although patients with rs6920220 AA + AG genotypes had fewer tender joints at the disease onset.

Can rheuma be scanned? : Review of the current study situation on fluorescence optical imaging

The novel technique of indocyanine green (ICG)-based fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) using the Xiralite® system (Rheumascan) has been the subject of many different studies worldwide since approval for clinical use in the European Union (2009), USA (2014) and Asia. The FOI depicts the disturbed microcirculation in the joints of both hands caused by inflammation. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the current state of studies on ICG-based FOI in different rheumatologic indications. Anarrative literature review of publications on ICG-based FOI in the diagnosis of various inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases since 2010 is presented, its use in treatment monitoring is explained, and its value in systemic sclerosis is outlined. In summary, studies have extensively demonstrated the accuracy of FOI in inflammation detection. Therefore, it can be concluded that FOI is agood supplement to existing imaging modalities. Due to characteristic patterns of both skin and nails, FOI is an indicated procedure especially in psoriatic arthritis and can be very helpful in the diagnostic process in early undifferentiated arthritis. The FOI has shown its usefulness in children (juvenile idiopathic arthritis), for monitoring the course of treatment, and for demonstrating disturbed microcirculation in patients with systemic sclerosis. The presented data imply that FOI should be considered as avaluable complementary imaging tool in the diagnostic algorithm of daily rheumatologic practice, both for diagnosis and for follow-up monitoring. In particular, the automated analyses should be able in the future to objectify measurements of inflammatory activity as well as monitoring the response to treatment.

Prevalence and predictors of atlanto-axial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis after 12-years' follow-up (ESPOIR Cohort).

Anterior atlanto-axial subluxation (AAS), defined as an anterior atlanto-dental interval ≥3 mm, can occur in RA and carries a risk of severe neurological impairments. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and predictors of radiographic aAAS after 12 years' follow-up of patients with early polyarthritis. We studied patients enrolled in the early polyarthritis cohort ESPOIR (Study and Monitoring of Early Undifferentiated Arthritis) between 2002 and 2005 (at least two swollen joints for >6 weeks and <6 months, no other diagnosis than RA, and no previous exposure to glucocorticoids or DMARDs). All patients still in the cohort after 12 years had dynamic cervical-spine radiographs taken then read by two blinded observers. To evaluate how well combinations of tests performed at baseline and 10 years predicted aAAS after 12 years, univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression procedure were applied. Of 323 patients followed for 12 years, 15 (4.6%; 95% CI 2.8, 6.4) had aAAS. Among baseline variables, only IgA RFs were associated (P < 0.05) with aAAS (sensitivity 60%, specificity 75%). Among data collected after 10 years, oral CS therapy during the 10-year interval, treatment by DMARDs, CRP (mg/dl) and positive tests for RFs were associated with aAAS after 12 years, but only CRP and RFs remained in a model of logistic regression (combination predicted aAAS with a sensitivity of 60% for a specificity of 90%). In conclusion, the prevalence of aAAS after 12 years was 4.6% in the ESPOIR cohort, with no patients having severe aAAS. Although some factors were found to be statistically associated to AAS, the event is too rare to allow a clinical relevance.

OUTCOME OF DOUBLE BLIND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SULFASALAZINE AND HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE IN EARLY UNDIFFERENTIATED INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS

Objective:Undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis is one of the requirements for being diagnosed in the patient doesnt meet the classical criteria for recognized arthritis. which no approved treatment algorithm exist. Sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine used in this trial for early Undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis. Methods: A six-month, double-blind, randomized experiment was conducted. Undifferentiated arthritis in 100 consecutive patients. ESR, morning stiffness, number of swollen joints, and a pain score are all measured on a monthly basis. Patients with certain rheumatological diagnoses were excluded.. Results: The trial was completed by 74 patients.The sulfasalazine group patient responds better and more promptly. There have been respond in terms of grip strength, pain score, and the duration of morning stiffness compared to hydroxychloroquine.The 26 withdrawal from the research prematurely owing to side effects, with gastrointestinal symptoms being the primary cause in the actively treated group. Conclusions:Our statistics lead us to the conclusion that sulfasalazine provides an earlier and better response than hydroxychloroquine. The earlier Response to sulfasalazine is a significant benefit for patients quality of life.

Features Found in Indocyanine Green-Based Fluorescence Optical Imaging of Inflammatory Diseases of the Hands.

Rheumatologists in Europe and the USA increasingly rely on fluorescence optical imaging (FOI, Xiralite) for the diagnosis of inflammatory diseases. Those include rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and osteoarthritis, among others. Indocyanine green (ICG)-based FOI allows visualization of impaired microcirculation caused by inflammation in both hands in one examination. Thousands of patients are now documented and most literature focuses on inflammatory arthritides, which affect synovial joints and their related structures, making it a powerful tool in the diagnostic process of early undifferentiated arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. However, it has become gradually clear that this technique has the potential to go even further than that. FOI allows visualization of other types of tissues. This means that FOI can also support the diagnostic process of vasculopathies, myositis, collagenoses, and other connective tissue diseases. This work summarizes the most prominent imaging features found in FOI examinations of inflammatory diseases, outlines the underlying anatomical structures, and introduces a nomenclature for the features and, thus, supports the idea that this tool is a useful part of the imaging repertoire in rheumatology clinical practice, particularly where other imaging methods are not easily available.

VEGF Profile in Early Undifferentiated Arthritis Cohort.

Background and Objectives: Early undifferentiated arthritis (UA) is a group of inflammatory joint diseases that are not classified under any specific rheumatic or connective tissue disorder and might evolve into chronic inflammatory arthritis or may be a self-limiting condition. Early recognition and treatment are crucial for the future course of the disease. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an angiogenic regulator that induces the growth of new capillary blood vessels, which are important in joint invasion and destruction during the progression of chronic inflammatory arthritis. The aim of this study was to assess VEGF levels associated with sociodemographic, clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings in the early UA patient cohort as well as to evaluate VEGF as a potential prognostic marker for arthritis outcomes. Materials and Methods: Seventy-six patients with inflammatory arthritis in at least one joint, with a duration of arthritis <12 months at the study entry that did not meet any rheumatic disease classification criteria, were enrolled after informed consent was obtained. Patient’s sociodemographic, laboratory data, and clinical disease characteristics were recorded, VEGF levels were measured, and ultrasound (US) of tender and swollen joints was performed. Results: VEGF levels had positive correlation with conventional rheumatic disease activity and diagnostic markers: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C–reactive protein (CRP), and rheumatoid factor (RF) (p < 0.05). RF-positive patients had higher VEGF values (p = 0.024). A statistically higher number of patients whose VEGF levels were below the median value presented with active infection (p = 0.046). In patients with a higher number of swollen joints, and a higher score of synovitis and power doppler (PD) seen on US, VEGF levels were statistically significantly higher. Patients who after 12-month follow-up developed rheumatoid arthritis (RA) had statistically higher VEGF levels at baseline compared with those who developed spondyloarthropathies (p = 0.028). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that VEGF levels significantly represented inflammatory processes that were present in the joints (number of swollen joints, synovitis, and PD changes) of the early UA cohort.

Glucocorticoid discontinuation in patients with early rheumatoid and undifferentiated arthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the BeSt and IMPROVED studies

ObjectivesTo evaluate the success rate of glucocorticoid discontinuation and to study which factors are associated with successful discontinuation.MethodsData from two treat-to-target studies, BeSt (target Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4) and...

First-year drug therapy of new-onset rheumatoid and undifferentiated arthritis: a nationwide register-based study

BackgroundIn this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the drug therapies used for early rheumatoid (RA) and undifferentiated (UA) arthritis patients.MethodsFrom a nationwide register maintained by the Social Insurance Institution, information on sex, date of birth, and date of special medicine reimbursement decision for all new Finnish RA and UA patients between 2011 and 14 were collected, and their DMARD (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug) purchases during the first year after the diagnosis were analyzed.ResultsA total of 7338 patients with early RA (67.3% female, 68.1% seropositive) and 2433 with early UA (67.8% female) were identified. DMARDs were initiated during the first month after the diagnosis to 92.0% of the patients with seropositive RA, 90.3% with seronegative RA and to 87.7% with UA (p < 0.001). Respectively, 72.1, 63.4, and 42.9% of the patients (p < 0.001) purchased methotrexate; 49.8, 35.9, and 16.0% (p < 0.001) as part of a DMARD combination during the first month. By the end of the first year after the diagnosis, self-injected biologics were purchased by 2.6, 5.3 and 3.1% (p < 0.001) of them. Only 1.4, 2.6 and 3.0% (p < 0.001) of the patients were not receiving any DMARDs. During the first year, 83.4% of the seropositive RA patients had purchased methotrexate, 50.4% sulfasalazine, 72.1% hydroxychloroquine, and 72.6% prednisolone.ConclusionsCurrently, combination therapy including methotrexate is a common treatment strategy for early seropositive RA in Finland. Despite an easy access to biologics, these drugs are seldom needed during the first year after diagnosis.

Do new and old biomarkers of early undifferentiated arthritis correlate with Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales?

In early undifferentiated arthritis (EUA), the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and disability is still unclear. The aim of this study was to correlate inflammatory biomarkers with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) in EUA. Seventy patients with EUA were compared with 20 patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The association of AIMS [mobility, physical impairment (PI), dexterity, household activities, activities of daily living (ADL), social activity, pain, anxiety, depression] with serum laboratory [phase acute reactants, calprotectin, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, rheumatoid factor, anti-nuclear and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies, HLA-DRB], clinical [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), fatigue, pain and stiffness NRS], x-ray and ultrasound biomarkers was analysed with non-parametric Spearman's rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U tests. No differences in AIMS were found between EUA and established RA patients, or between EUA patients that evolved into early RA (n=17) and those that remained EUA (n=53) at six months of follow-up. In EUA, erythrocyte sedimentation rate correlated with mobility impairment, PI and depression (p=0.04, p=0.03 and p=0.022, respectively), TNF-α correlated with PI (p=0.01) and calprotectin with anxiety (p=0.02). HLA-DRB1*11-positive EUA patients had lower ADL deficiency (p=0.006), depression (p=0.0004) and anxiety (p=0.01). CDAI correlated with PI (p=0.01) and pain (p=0.01), fatigue with PI (p=0.0001) and ADL (p=0.009), stiffness with PI (p=0.01), and Power Doppler ultrasound synovitis with PI (p=0.02) and pain (p=0.007). In EUA, physical and mood disorders are associated with new and old inflammatory serological, clinical and imaging biomarkers. HLA-DRB1*11-positivity may be protective against these disease-related features.

THE ROLE OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AS MONOTHERAPY IN MANAGING EARLY UNDIFFERENTIATED ARTHRITIS: A PROSPECTIVE HOSPITAL-BASED STUDY

Introduction: Early undifferentiated arthritis (EUA) is a common form of arthritis comprising, joint pain, stiffness and swelling with no definitive diagnosis. Patients of EUA can progress to other forms of rheumatic arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis or remain in the same form or spontaneously disappear. The main focus of this study is to explore the potential effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in management of EUA as a monotherapy treatment. Methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study which was conducted in Almwada hospital in Khartoum, Sudan. The study included thirty patients of EUA. Full clinical examination and history were done by a rheumatologist, and all the related investigations were obtained, and they all received HCQ after EUA diagnosis has been established. Result: The study shows that 96% of the patients responded well to the treatment and 10% had their duration of treatment doubled to show a favorable response. We also found that female patients weremore commonly affected than male ones with higher incidence among middle aged as compared to others. After treatment with HCQ, 86.6% of the patients showed average mean decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) by 44%, the other 13.4%, even though they were symptoms free after treatment they showed increased level of ESR by 30% average. Conclusion: In the present study we found out most of the EUA patients are well responded to the HCQ treatment, and most of them respond from the first course of treatment, the study also shows higher incidence among female in compared to male.

Evaluation and monitoring of established rheumatoid arthritis

Established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a term used to distinguish patients with longer disease duration versus early RA or undifferentiated arthritis that may progress to RA. Although, there is no uniform definition for early disease, a cut-off of 2 years is used in most clinical trials and observational studies. In the evaluation of established RA, clinicians should incorporate a comprehensive set of measures addressing: (1) disease activity, especially inflammation that may benefit of intensification of therapy, (2) health status, (3) comorbidities, and (4) damage. Ideally, measures should include the patient and physician perspectives and be feasible, reliable, valid and sensitive to change. Traditionally, measures have been incorporated in clinical research, but it would be worthwhile to integrate them into routine care. Data collection systems adapted to rheumatologists needs, could advance care for individual patients and facilitate large observational studies to evaluate interventions for the whole spectrum of RA.

Clinical and radiographic course of early undifferentiated arthritis under treatment is not dependent on the number of joints with erosions at diagnosis: results from the Swiss prospective observational cohort

ObjectiveTo analyse whether early arthritis patients who do not fulfil the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a different course...

Early undifferentiated arthritis

Early recognition and treatment of inflammatory arthritis is imperative for the further course of the disease. Patients with inflammatory arthritis should be referred as early as possible to arheumatologist for further management. Acombination of anamnesis, clinical examination, imaging and laboratory measurements enable adifferential diagnosis. If aspecific diagnosis is not possible, the disease is called early undifferentiated arthritis. Early effective treatment should be instituted for those at risk of developing persistent and/or erosive arthritis. Treatment includes both pharmacological and non-pharmacological options. In the management of early arthritis acombination of regular monitoring and optimal treatment interventions are paramount to achieve remission and improve outcome of the disease (treat-to-target).

Early Undifferentiated Arthritis: A Developing Country Perspective from Nepal

Early undifferentiated arthritis is a group of inflammatory joint disease of less than 3 months duration that do not classify under any of the specific rheumatic or connective tissue disorder. Previously, inflammatory arthritis used to be treated only when there was a clear evidence of damage or deformity occurring with it. Use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were considered potentially harmful early in the course of arthritis which could be self-limiting. However, with the abundance of data on outcomes of early arthritis and identification of factors that can help to predict those outcomes lead to earlier use of such DMARDs. Better understanding of serological tests like anti-CCP antibodies and imaging modalities like high frequency ultrasound with power doppler and magnetic resonance imaging has increased the diagnostic and prognostic yield of such early arthritis cases. It is now imperative that the risk be assessed early in the course of disease and early DMARDs be instituted for better outcome in these cases. This review analyses the historical evolution of evidence in the management of early undifferentiated arthritis and summarises the treatment approach, monitoring and disease outcomes till date. Keywords: arthritides; Nepal; power doppler; rheumatoid; ultrasonography.

Benefits of anticitrullinated peptides examination in rheumatoid arthritis.

Anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA) are specific for rheumatoid arthritis and have been implicated in disease pathogenesis. ACPA examination is a new component of ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. ACPA positivity predicts a more erosive disease course with severe joint damage and extra-articular manifestations. To evaluate the benefits of ACPA examination in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We examined patients with arthritis and tested them for ACPA positivity. In every individual patient we evaluated if ACPA examination was necessary to establish the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, or to change treatment, or if the diagnosis could have been established without ACPA examination (ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria was met without ACPA scoring). The study was placed in Slovak Republic. We examined 833 patients with arthritis. There were 43 patients, or 62% of a subgroup of 69 who were ACPA positive whose ACPA examination was not needed-ACR/EULAR criteria was met without ACPA scoring. This number represents 5.1% of the total number examined. There were 15 patients, or 22% of the subgroup and 1.8% of the total whose diagnosis was revised to rheumatoid arthritis due to ACPA positivity-ACR/EULAR criteria were met solely with ACPA scoring. There were 11 patients (16% and 1.3%) whose medication was changed due to ACPA positivity. ACPA examination is useful in 3.1% of all examined patients. When we correlate data on ACPA positive patients, 38% of the patients profit from ACPA examinations. Considering the relatively low price of ACPA testing, this examination should not be excluded.

Further Treatment Intensification in Undifferentiated and Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Already in Low Disease Activity has Limited Benefit towards Physical Functioning

BackgroundIt is recommended to optimise treatment as long as a predefined treatment target is not met, but should the aim be remission if patients are in low disease activity (LDA)? The aim of this study was to assess if, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA) with Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤ 2.4 (LDA), treatment intensification results in better functional ability.MethodsIn the IMPROVED study 610 patients with early RA or UA were treated with methotrexate + tapered high-dose prednisone. After 4 months, patients with DAS ≥ 1.6 were randomised to either of two treatment strategies. Patients with DAS < 1.6 tapered treatment. Over 5 years, patients with DAS ≥ 1.6 required treatment intensification, but protocol violations occurred, which allowed us to test the effect of treatment intensification regardless of subsequent DAS. A linear mixed model was used to test, in patients in LDA, the relationship between treatment intensification and functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]) over time.ResultsThe number of patients in LDA per visit ranged from 88 to 146. Per visit, 27–74% of the patients in LDA had treatment intensification. We found a statistically significant effect of treatment intensification on ΔHAQ, corrected for baseline HAQ, age, sex and treatment strategy (β = −0.085, 95% CI −0.13 to −0.044). When ΔDAS was added, the effect of treatment intensification was partly explained by ΔDAS, and the association with HAQ was no longer statistically significant (β = −0.022, 95% CI −0.060 to 0.016). When the interaction between treatment intensification and time in follow-up was added, a statistically significant interaction was found (β = 0.0098, 95% CI 0.0010 to 0.019), indicating lesser improvement in HAQ after treatment intensification if follow-up time increased.ConclusionsFor patients with early RA and patients with UA already in LDA, further treatment intensification aimed at DAS remission does not result in meaningful functional improvement.Trial registrationISRCTN, 11916566. Registered on 28 December 2006. EudraCT, 2006-006186-16. Registered on 16 July 2007.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of 5-year drug-free remission-steered treatment in patients with early arthritis: IMPROVED study.

To determine the 5-year outcomes of early remission induction therapy followed by targeted treatment aimed at drug-free remission (DFR) in patients with early arthritis. In 12 hospitals, 610 patients with early (<2 years) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or undifferentiated arthritis (UA) started on methotrexate (MTX) 25 mg/week and prednisone (60 mg/day tapered to 7.5 mg/day). Patients not in early remission (Disease Activity Score <1.6 after 4 months) were randomised (single blind) to arm 1, adding hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day and sulfasalazine 2000 mg/day, or arm 2, switching to MTX plus adalimumab 40 mg/2 weeks. Treatment adjustments over time aimed at DFR. Outcomes were remission percentages, functional ability, toxicity and radiological damage progression after 5 years. After 4 months, 387 patients were in early remission, 83 were randomised to arm 1 and 78 to arm 2. After 5 years, 295/610 (48%) patients were in remission, 26% in sustained DFR (SDFR) (≥1 year) (220/387 (57%) remission and 135/387 (35%) SDFR in the early remission group, 50% remission, 11% SDFR in the randomisation arms without differences between the arms). More patients with UA (37% vs 23% RA, p=0.001) and more anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-negative patients (37% vs 18% ACPA-positive, p<0.001) achieved SDFR.Overall, mean Health Assessment Questionnaire was 0.6 (0.5), and median (IQR) damage progression was 0.5 (0-2.7) Sharp/van der Heijde points, with only five patients showing progression >25 points in 5 years. Five years of DFR-steered treatment in patients with early RA resulted in almost normal functional ability without clinically relevant joint damage across treatment groups. Patients who achieved early remission had the best clinical outcomes. There were no differences between the randomisation arms. SDFR is a realistic treatment goal.

Early Diagnosing and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis, Benefits of Anti-Citrullinated Peptides Examination

Abstract Background: Anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA) are specific for rheumatoid arthritis and have been implicated in disease pathogenesis. ACPA examination is a new component of ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. ACPA positivity predicts a more erosive disease course with severe joint damage and extra-articular manifestations. Objectives: To evaluate the benefits of ACPA examination in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: We examined patients with arthritis and tested them for ACPA positivity. In every individual patient we evaluated if ACPA examination was necessary to establish the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, or to change treatment, or if the diagnosis could have been established without ACPA examination (ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria was met without ACPA scoring). Results and Conclusions: We examined 833 patients with arthritis. There were 43 patients, or 62 % of a subgroup of 69 who were ACPA positive whose ACPA examination was not needed - ACR/EULAR criteria was met without ACPA scoring. This number represents 5.1 % of the total number examined. There were 15 patients, or 22 % of the subgroup and 1.8 % of the total whose diagnosis was revised to rheumatoid arthritis due to ACPA positivity - ACR/EULAR criteria was met solely with ACPA scoring. There were 11 patients (16 % and 1.3 %) whose medication was changed due to ACPA positivity. ACPA examination is useful in 3,1 % of all examined patients. When we correlate data on ACPA positive patients, 38 % of the patients profit from ACPA examinations. Considering the relatively low price of ACPA testing, this examination should not be excluded.

Increased galectin-3 may serve as a serologic signature of pre-rheumatoid arthritis while markers of synovitis and cartilage do not differ between early undifferentiated arthritis subsets

BackgroundUndifferentiated arthritis (UA) is a label applied to patients with joint complaints which cannot be classified according to current criteria, which implies a need for precision diagnostic technologies. We studied serum galectin-3, a proinflammatory mediator, and seromarkers of structural joint elements in patients with early, UA and their associations with disease profile and biochemical and imaging findings.MethodsOne hundred and eleven UA patients were followed-up for at least 12 months and reclassified according to appropriate criteria (TUDAR). At baseline, demographics and laboratory and clinical disease measures, as well as wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) synovitis, erosion, and bone marrow edema scorings, were recorded. Galectin-3, the type IIA collagen N-terminal propeptide (PIIANP), which is a marker of regenerative cartilage formation, and hyaluronan (HYA), which is prevalent in synovial tissue swellings, were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the discriminant capacity of galectin-3 against arthritis subsets.ResultsGalectin-3 was increased in pre-rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (4.6 μg/l, interquartile range (IQR) 3.8–5.5) versus non-RA (4.0 μg/l, IQR 3.1–4.9; p = 0.03) and controls (3.8 μg/l, IQR 3.0–4.8; p = 0.009). PIIANP was equally depressed in either subset (p < 0.01). Galectin-3 in non-RA and HYA in UA did not differ from healthy controls. In the entire UA cohort, galectin-3 correlated with the MRI bone marrow edema score, while PIIANP correlated with the MRI erosion score, and HYA with the synovitis and erosion scores. ROC curve analysis showed that baseline galectin-3 discriminated well between pre-RA and non-RA with univariate area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.76) while AUC for galectin-3 + anti-CCP increased to 0.71 (95% CI 0.59–0.83).ConclusionsGalectin-3 in serum was increased in patients with early UA of pre-RA origin. Cartilage remodeling assessed by PIIANP was diminished in UA irrespective of subsequent clinical differentiation, while HYA did not differ from controls. ROC analysis showed a potential for galectin-3 to discriminate between pre-RA and non-RA.Trial registrationKF 11 315829. Registered 25 July 2006.

Ultrasound-detectable grey scale synovitis predicts future fulfilment of the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria in patients with new-onset undifferentiated arthritis

ObjectiveTo determine the clinical outcomes for patients with new-onset undifferentiated arthritis (UA), not fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria,...