Early Switch Research Articles

An Update on Recent Clinical Trial Data in Bloodstream Infection

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality globally, exacerbated by an ageing population and rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This review offers an updated evaluation of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in BSI management from 2018 onwards, focusing on the evolving landscape of diagnostics and treatment. New rapid diagnostic technologies and shorter antimicrobial courses have transformed clinical practice, reducing the time to appropriate therapy and hospital stays. Several RCTs demonstrated that rapid phenotypic and genotypic tests shorten the time to optimal therapy, especially when paired with antimicrobial stewardship. Ongoing trials are investigating novel antimicrobial regimens and the safety of early oral switch strategies, particularly for Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSIs. Recent RCTs on Staphylococcus aureus BSI (SAB) and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria highlight advances in treatment but emphasize the need for further study into the efficacy of combination therapies and the utility of rapid diagnostics in different healthcare settings. The review also explores challenges in trail design, with adaptive and pragmatic appropriates improving the efficacy of clinical trials. Finally, this paper identifies gaps in the research, including the need for further investigation into oral step-down therapy, optimal durations, and the role of rapid diagnostics in resource-limited settings.

Early switch maintenance in gastric cancer: who benefits most?

Early switch maintenance in gastric cancer: who benefits most?

Prescribing a Green Future: A Review of Antimicrobial Waste in Pediatric Hospitals and Practices to Promote Healthcare Sustainability.

Pediatric hospitals are uniquely positioned to be impacted by antimicrobial waste. To explore this issue, we reviewed the current literature to identify the reasons, costs, and potential solutions to waste. Identified reasons for waste included weight-based dosing, medication order changes due to changing patient status, loss or expiration of doses, and medication errors. The cost of waste included financial costs, promotion of antimicrobial resistance, and generation of greenhouse gases. Proposed interventions to reduce waste included an early switch from intravenous to oral administration, required stop dates, standardized dosing times, and optimization of the pharmacy batching process. However, additional studies are needed to assess the potential correlation between these proposed interventions and waste reduction. Antimicrobial stewardship programs have been identified as a group that can play a crucial role in partnering to implement these interventions to potentially reduce antimicrobial waste and promote better healthcare sustainability.

LBA45 Early switch from targeted to immunotherapy in advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: Long-term OS and final PFS results of the randomized phase II ImmunoCobiVem trial

LBA45 Early switch from targeted to immunotherapy in advanced BRAFV600-positive melanoma: Long-term OS and final PFS results of the randomized phase II ImmunoCobiVem trial

The importance and prognostic effect of thyroid hormones in patients with transposition of the great arteries

Objectives: Transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a rare congenital heart disease that occurs in 3 in 10,000 newborns and is rapidly fatal (90%) within one year if left untreated. The prognosis of this pathology changed after introducing an early arterial switch operation (ASO), while the left ventricle could still adapt to systemic high-pressure conditions. Appropriate regulation of thyroid hormones positively impacts metabolism, cardiac function, and postoperative recovery. Therefore, regular thyroid hormone monitoring and thyroid function monitoring of TGA patients may help to improve the health status and prognosis of this group of postoperative patients. Methods: In our study, 127 patients who underwent ASO at our pediatric cardiac surgery clinic between 01.01.2014 and 18.09.2021 were retrospectively analyzed and included. Among the patients, 43% (n=54) were females, and 57% (n=73) were males. Results: The coronary arteries were normal in 89.7% (n=114) and abnormal in 10.3% (n=13) of the patients. Twenty-one of the patients exited, and mortality was calculated to be 16.5%. There were no significant differences in mortality or thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (T4), or free triiodothyronine (T3) values (P=0.674, P=0.345, P=0.478). In our study, in which we investigated the effect of thyroid hormone levels on prognosis in neonatal patients with TGA with normal free T3, T4, and TSH values, we found that TSH levels were greater in the group with advanced aortic regurgitation and exitus, although the effect of thyroid hormones on postoperative results was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Congenital hypothyroidism is a common disease with cardiac effects. During the neonatal period, this disease may conceal itself. Careful, expert clinical follow-up and clinical trials are crucial to improve outcomes in the surgical treatment of transposition of the great arteries, a complex congenital heart disease.

IBD Patients with Primary or Secondary Nonresponse to Ustekinumab Benefit from Dose Escalation or Reinduction.

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of IBD. This drug has a well-established efficacy; however, patients may not respond or lose response. The availability of other biological therapies prompts the need for comparative data between different agents to suggest first- or second-line strategies. Aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab to other biologics in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as report the available data on dose escalation and reinduction. A systematic electronic search of the English literature was performed up to November 2023, using Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Conference proceedings were also screened. Out of 659 citations, 80 relevant articles were selected and included in the present narrative review. Head-to-head comparisons of different biological drugs are relatively scarce, mostly deriving from indirect comparison or retrospective studies. Overall available data indicate similar effectiveness in the treatment of IBD patients. Dose escalation and reinduction strategies are well documented, but the optimal treatment schedule is still to be defined. Response and remission rates vary in different studies, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical and endoscopic outcomes. However, both approaches are effective and safe in nonresponders and secondary loss of response. IBD patients may benefit from dose escalation or reinduction. Both strategies prove effective in regaining response in a proportion of patients, avoiding unnecessary early switch. Head-to-head trials are still needed to determine the exact placement of this drug compared to other biologics.

Repeated Previous Transarterial Treatments Negatively Affect Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib

Background: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and radioembolisation (TARE) can lead to the deterioration of liver function, especially in cases of a high tumour burden, potentially lessening the benefits of subsequent systemic treatments. We aimed to verify whether a high number of previous transarterial treatments modified the outcomes of patients who received sorafenib as a frontline systemic treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a large multicenter dataset containing prospectively collected data of sorafenib-treated patients was conducted. Results: Data from 696 patients were analysed, with 139 patients having received >two transarterial procedures before starting sorafenib. A propensity score matched 139 identified pairs of patients. Having received >two locoregional treatments was independently associated with a shorter survival (hazard ratio 1.325, 95% confidence interval 1.018–1.725, p = 0.039). This pattern was confirmed amongst responders to sorafenib, but not in progressors. A trend toward a higher rate of the permanent discontinuation of sorafenib due to liver failure (18.7 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.089) and a lower rate of eligibility for second-line treatments (24.5 vs. 17.3%, p = 0.184) was observed in patients who had received >two transarterial procedures. Conclusions: Repeated endovascular treatments negatively impacted the survival of HCC patients, especially sorafenib-responders. An early switch to systemic therapies should be considered in cases that are unlikely to respond.

Abstract PO4-19-09: Comparison of clinical efficacy between letrozole + ribociclib vs. Fulvestrant + letrozole + ribociclib in Hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – a randomized, phase 2 study (KCSG BR22-20)

Abstract Background The current standard first-line treatment in advanced or metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer is combination of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and cyclin D kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Emergence of ESR1 mutation is a key mechanism of resistance during first-line AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. Selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD) such as elacestrant or fulvestrant is suggested as second-line treatment, but the progression-free survival (PFS) outcome of second-line treatment is reported up to 3.78 months in patients who harbour ESR1 mutation. Recently, early switch of AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor to fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor at the point of rising ESR1 mutation showed prolongation of PFS up to 6 months, suggesting there may be a new strategy to overcome ESR1 mutation by modifying endocrine treatment. SWOG S0226 suggested that upfront fulvestrant + AI is feasible and associated with prolongation of PFS compared to AI alone. After CDK4/6 inhibitor has been introduced to standard treatment, there were no trials evaluating the role of AI + fulvestrant with CDK4/6 inhibitor. In this trial, we investigated triplet combination of AI + fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor as a treatment to overcome resistant mechanism such as development of ESR1 mutation when compared to current standard treatment of AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor as the first line treatment in HR positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Methods This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label phase II trial comparing AI plus ribociclib versus AI, fulvestrant plus ribociclib in HR-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. De novo patients or patients with treatment-free interval (TFI) over 12 months after completion of adjuvant AI can be enrolled. If patients received adjuvant tamoxifen, patients with TFI less than 12 months can be also enrolled for the study. Prior endocrine treatment or cytotoxic chemotherapy at metastatic setting was not allowed. In cases of premenopausal women, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is administered every 4 weeks with treatment. A total of 202 patients will be enrolled for 30 months, and 30 months of follow-up is planned after last-patient enrolment. Patients are randomized to 1:1, stratified based on the presence of visceral metastasis and previous administration of adjuvant AI. Study treatment of the control arm consists of letrozole 2.5mg daily with ribociclib 600mg (Day 1-Day 21 daily by month, 1 week off) until progression. In the experimental arm fulvestrant 500mg intramuscular injection is added (Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter) until progression. For exploratory analysis of ESR1 mutations, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is collected at baseline, and then every 3 months thereafter. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the difference of 24-months PFS rate. Secondary endpoint included PFS, overall survival (OS), emergence and frequency of ESR1 mutation, overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The analysis is planned after completion of 30 months of follow-up, which provides approximately 90% power to detect superiority 24 months-PFS rate assumed by Kaplan-Meier curve of letrozole + fulvestrant + ribociclib versus letrozole + ribociclib using a log-rank test, assuming a hazard ratio of 0.64 at a two-sided alpha of 0.2. Citation Format: Jieun Lee, Su-Jin Koh, Jung Hye Kwon, Gun Min Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Ho Young Kim, Hee-Jun Kim, Keon-Uk Park, Kyong Hwa Park, Yeon Hee Park, Mi Sun Ahn, Hee Kyung Ahn, Gyeong-Won Lee, Kyoung Eun Lee, Kyung-Hun Lee, Moon Hee Lee, Sung Sook Lee, Jung Lim Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Joo Young Jung, In Hae Park. Comparison of clinical efficacy between letrozole + ribociclib vs. Fulvestrant + letrozole + ribociclib in Hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – a randomized, phase 2 study (KCSG BR22-20) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-19-09.

Infectious Diseases: What You May Have Missed in 2023.

In 2023, published research on COVID-19 remains prominent. The aim of this article is to highlight important developments in infectious disease evidence unrelated to COVID-19 that were published in 2023. The literature was screened for sound new evidence relevant to internal medicine specialists and subspecialists whose focus of practice is not infectious diseases. The highlighted publications relate to various organisms and patient populations. One article provides insight into the updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis. Several articles address the management of sepsis and bacteremia: comparison of cefepime versus piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftobiprole for the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, and early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Another article examines differences in all-cause mortality in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection who receive different treatments. Additional articles provide evidence about the treatment of patients with HIV infection: the utility of preexposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV infection, the efficacy of pitavastatin in reducing cardiovascular disease, and the efficacy of dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in persons with HIV.

Early versus late switch over of antiseizure medications from intravenous to the oral route in children with seizures: Single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ELAIO trial)

IntroductionEarly switch-over of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) from intravenous to oral route may reduce the duration of hospitalization, drug acquisition costs, and behavioral upset in hospitalized children with seizures. ObjectiveThe primary objective was to compare short-term seizure recurrence within 1 week in hospitalized children aged 1 month to 18 years with new-onset/breakthrough seizures after an early versus late switch-over from intravenous to the oral route of ASMs. Secondary objectives were to compare the incidence of status epilepticus, duration of hospital stay, drug acquisition costs, and caregiver-reported satisfaction scores in both groups. MethodsIn this single-blind randomized controlled trial, patients with seizures were categorized based on the number of ASMs required and the history of status epilepticus. Patients in each category were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either early or late switch-over (ES or LS) groups. In the ES groups, ASMs were tapered one-by-one between 0 and 24 hours of seizure freedom, while in the LS groups, they were tapered one-by-one between 24 and 48 hours of seizure freedom. ResultsA total of 112 children were enrolled in the study, with 56 in each arm. Seizure recurrence at 1 week and 12 weeks was comparable in ES and LS groups (3/55 vs. 1/54 at 1 week, p=0.61; 7/49 vs. 6/49 at 12 weeks, p=0.98). Drug acquisition costs were significantly lower in the ES group (393±274 vs. 658±568 INR, p=0.002). Thrombophlebitis and dysphoria were significantly more common in the LS group (p=0.008 and 0.03, respectively). ConclusionThe early switch-over of ASMs from intravenous to oral route is safe without any significant increased risk of short-term seizure recurrence and also associated with a reduction in the incidence of thrombophlebitis and ASM acquisition costs. Trial registration NoCTRI/2021/03/032145

Effectiveness of antibiotic therapy for early recurrence of peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveShort-term recurrence is common in patients with peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses, leading to socioeconomic problems. Early switching from intravenous to oral antibiotics is feasible for treating certain diseases. However, reports on early switching and total antibiotic administration duration in peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses are limited. This study aimed to determine the appropriate antibiotic therapy duration and examine the impact of early oral switch therapy on peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses. MethodsWe retrospectively identified 98,394 patients who received antibiotic therapy during hospitalization for peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. ResultsPropensity score matching analysis revealed no significant between-group difference in the rehospitalization rate (early oral switch therapy and long intravenous therapy: 1.7 % [198 of 11,621] vs. 2.0 % [234 of 11,621], odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.02). A long total duration of antibiotic therapy (reference: 1–9 days) was associated with a low risk of rehospitalization (10–14 days: OR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.78–0.95; 15+ days: OR 0.51, 95 % CI 0.38–0.66). ConclusionEarly oral switch therapy may be a viable option for treating patients with peritonsillar cellulitis and abscesses in good condition who can tolerate oral intake. No less than 10 days of antibiotic therapy is desirable.

Abstract 5145: Association of a ctDNA biomarker of treatment response with clinical outcomes in a real-world pan-cancer cohort treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Abstract Clinical evidence suggests that early changes in circulating tumor DNA tumor fraction (ctDNA TF) is predictive of patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, but the extent to which this approach can be used for patients on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) is not known. Here, we use xF Monitor to estimate ctDNA TF in patients that received TKIs and show that changes in circulating TF correlate with outcomes in a real-world pan-cancer cohort. Tempus xF Monitor is a ctDNA assay that measures quantitative molecular changes in ctDNA TF by utilizing diverse genomic events, dynamically weighting somatic variant allele frequencies and copy number variants, while using germline information to inform these estimates and providing single nucleotide variant (SNV) results on 105 genes. Molecular responders (MR) were defined as patients with ≥50% reduction in ctDNA TF between baseline and on-treatment time points, consistent with our previously established threshold. Deidentified patient records from the Tempus multimodal database were analyzed if patients had an xF test ≤ 15 weeks prior to the start of their first TKI regimen and an xF test 15 -180 days post-TKI initiation. Patients received TKI agents as classified in the Tempus Medical Ontology, which assigns a unique ID to key clinical concepts, validated and harmonized across industry standard terminologies. The TKI list was further validated using the NCI Metathesaurus (https://ncim.nci.nih.gov/ncimbrowser/) TKI concept (NCI Code C1967). Clinical endpoints were defined from TKI start to the first progression event or death (rwPFS) or death (rwOS), both censored on the last follow-up in event-free patients. Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to compare MR status and survival outcomes on TKI. The evaluable pan-cancer cohort N=69, median age = 61.5 yo, advanced/metastatic disease = 72%, 65% were female, consisted of > 10 cancer diagnoses (35% NSCLC, 26% BC), 41% 1L. In this cohort, 49% of patients received a TKI combination regimen, 21% with CT, 18% with ICI. 68% of patients with NGS testing received matched targeted mutation therapies based on NCCN guidelines. Patients classified as MR based on xF Monitor results had improved survival outcomes with a median rwOS of 951 days (vs 439 days for non-MRs). MR patients had significantly longer rwPFS (HR = 0.383, p = 0.005, CI = 0.12 - 0.75) and rwOS (HR = 0.205, p = 0.004, CI = 0.07 - 0.61) than non-MRs. xF Monitor is a novel tumor naive serial quantitative ctDNA TF algorithm off the Tempus xF assay that has the potential to be used clinically as a monitoring biomarker to stratify patients who are likely to benefit from TKI therapy. xF monitor can be used as a strategy to identify patients at a high risk of progression who could benefit from early switch or intensifying therapy. Results need to be prospectively validated in a larger cohort. Citation Format: Akash Mitra, John Guittar, Regina Schwind, Terri Driessen, Matthew Berginski, Christine Lo, Michelle M. Stein, Jonathan Freaney, Seung Won Hyun, Chithra Sangli, Kate Sasser, Halla Nimeiri, Aadel Chaudhuri. Association of a ctDNA biomarker of treatment response with clinical outcomes in a real-world pan-cancer cohort treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5145.

Abstract 3676: A circulating tumor fraction DNA biomarker response stratified by ESR1 mutation status correlates with overall survival in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: ESR1 mutations (ESR1m) are acquired resistance mutations that evolve during treatment with aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy in approximately 40% of ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients and are indicative of poor outcomes. Patients with ESR1m acquired on AI may retain treatment response if switched to selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) like fulvestrant. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis can detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations and simultaneously determine molecular response to therapy through changes in quantitative ctDNA tumor fraction (ctDNA TF). We used real-world data (RWD) to study the combined effect of acquired ESR1 mutation status and ctDNA TF dynamics on overall survival in ER+ HER2- mBC. Methods: Tempus xF Monitor is a ctDNA assay that measures quantitative molecular changes in ctDNA TF by utilizing diverse genomic events, dynamically weighting somatic variant allele frequencies and copy number variants, while using germline information to inform these estimates and providing single nucleotide variant (SNV) results on 105 genes including ESR1. Non-responders (NR) were characterized as < 50% reduction in ctDNA TF while responders (MR) experienced ≥ 50% reduction in ctDNA TF. We selected a cohort from the deidentified Tempus multimodal database of 101 HR+ HER- mBC patients with a baseline xF test up to one year prior to or 3 months post AI therapy start. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined as the interval from AI start to death, censored on the last known physician follow-up. Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate the relationship between ESR1m and MR/NR status with rwOS. Results: In our evaluable cohort, (n=101), median age 59, ESR1m was detected in 29.7% (n=30) patients. ESR1m patients had shorter rwOS compared to ESR1 WT patients (median ESR1m rwOS 63.8 months, median rwOS not reached for ESR1 WT; p=0.013, HR=3.45 [1.9-9.2]). Across the cohort, regardless of ESR1 status, 23.8% (24/101) of patients were characterized as ΔctDNA TF MR, 60.4% (61/101) as NR and 15.8% (16/101) of patients with ctDNA TF values below the limit of blank (b-LOB). Within the NR group, 35.5% (22/61) were also ESR1m, while only 20.8% (5/24) and 18.8% (3/16) ESR1m patients were in the MR and b-LOB group, respectively. Patients with combined ESR1m + NR ΔctDNA TF (n=22) experienced shorter rwOS (p=0.015) compared to MR ΔctDNA TF patients with WT ESR1 (p=0.024, HR=6.61 [1.3-34.2]). Conclusions: xF Monitor is a ctDNA assay that tracks changes in quantitative ctDNA TF and simultaneously monitors for the emergence of ESR1m, providing a diagnostic that identifies resistance to AI therapy and enables early switch to therapies that could improve outcomes in a patient population with poor prognosis. A larger prospective clinical study is needed to validate these findings. Citation Format: Michelle M. Stein, Kristiyana Kaneva, Seung Won Hyun, Chithra Sangli, Michelle Ting-Lin, Rotem Ben-Shachar, Jonathan Freaney, Kate Sasser, Justin Guinney, Halla Nimeiri, Massimo Cristofanilli. A circulating tumor fraction DNA biomarker response stratified by ESR1 mutation status correlates with overall survival in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3676.

Early technique switch following failed passes during mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: should the approach change and when?

BackgroundFast and complete reperfusion in endovascular therapy (EVT) for ischemic stroke leads to superior clinical outcomes. The effect of changing the technical approach following initially unsuccessful passes remains undetermined.ObjectiveTo evaluate...

Hybrid RANS/LES modeling of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers with cold walls

Various strategies for hybrid RANS/LES modeling of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers subjected to strong wall-cooling are developed and analyzed. By defining a turbulent thermal length scale, the eddy viscosity and diffusivity of the hybrid model are calculated by the same formula, ℓ2ω. This allows a similar blending of the length scales and the development of analogous dynamic models for turbulent stress and heat flux. The dynamic procedure is applied to heat transfer by equating norms, rather than invoking least-squares with a lower bound, which improves robustness. The shielding function, as used in detached eddy simulations models, is revised to prevent a spurious early switch from the RANS to the LES mode. This revision significantly improves the accuracy of hybrid models on coarse grids. Finally, the proposed models are tested and validated for Mach numbers between 2.5 and 14, and wall-to-recovery temperature ratios between 0.18 and 1.

Comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

In the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs), vancomycin stands as the prevalent therapeutic agent. Daptomycin remains an alternative antibiotic to treat MRSA BSIs in cases where vancomycin proves ineffective. However, studies have conflicted on whether daptomycin is more effective than vancomycin among patients with MRSA BSI. To compare the effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin for the prevention of mortality among adult patients with MRSA BSI. Systematic searches of databases were performed, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) were used to assess the quality of individual observational and randomized control studies, respectively. Pooled odd ratios were calculated using random effects models. Twenty studies were included based on a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Daptomycin treatment was associated with non-significant lower mortality odds, compared to vancomycin treatment (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.06). Sub-analyses based on the time patients were switched from another anti-MRSA treatment to daptomycin demonstrated that switching to daptomycin within 3 or 5 days was significantly associated with 55% and 45% decreased odds of all-cause mortality, respectively. However, switching to daptomycin any time after five days of treatment was not significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. Stratified analysis based on vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) revealed that daptomycin treatment among patients infected with MRSA strains with MIC≥1 mg/L was significantly associated with 40% lower odds of mortality compared to vancomycin treatment. Compared with vancomycin, an early switch from vancomycin to daptomycin was significantly associated with lower odds of mortality. In contrast, switching to daptomycin at any time only showed a trend towards reduced mortality, with a non-significant association. Therefore, the efficacy of early daptomycin use over vancomycin against mortality among MRSA BSIs patients may add evidence to the existing literature in support of switching to daptomycin early over remaining on vancomycin. More randomized and prospective studies are needed to assess this association.

Clinical, organizational, and pharmacoeconomic perspectives of dalbavancin vs standard of care in the infectious disease network.

The therapeutic approach to the patient with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and complicated infections often involves the early transition from intravenous to oral therapy (early switch) or early discharge. Our study aimed to evaluate sustainable and innovative care models that can be transferred to community healthcare and the economic impact of dalbavancin therapy vs Standard of Care (SoC) therapy for the treatment of ABSSSI and other Gram-positive infections including those by multidrug-resistant organisms. We also described the organization of an infectious disease network that allows optimizing the treatment of ABSSSI and other complex infections with dalbavancin. We retrospectively studied all patients treated with dalbavancin in the University Hospital "S. Anna" of Ferrara, Italy, between November 2016 and December 2022. The clinical information of each patient was collected from the hospital's SAP database and used to evaluate the impact of dalbavancin in early discharge with reduction of length of stay promoting dehospitalization and in improving adherence to antibiotic therapy. A total of 287 patients (165 males and 122 females) were included in the study of which 62 were treated with dalbavancin. In 13/62 patients dalbavancin was administered in a single dose at the completion of therapy to facilitate early discharge. Assuming a 12-day hospitalization required for the treatment of ABSSSI or to complete the treatment of osteomyelitis or spondilodiscitis, the treatment with dalbavancin results in a cost reduction of more than €3,200 per single patient compared to SoC (dancomycin, linezolid or vancomycin). Dalbavancin has proven to be a valid therapeutic aid in the organization of a territorial infectious disease network given its prolonged action, which allows the dehospitalization with management of even patients with complex infections in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Early Switch From Intravenous to Oral Antibiotics for Patients With Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia

Gram-negative bacteremia is a global health concern, and optimizing the transition from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics is a critical step in improving patient treatment and resource utilization. To assess the association of switching to oral antibiotics within 4 days after initial blood culture with 90-day all-cause mortality compared with prolonged IV antibiotic treatment for patients with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. This cohort study conducted using the target trial emulation framework included observational data from adults with uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia in 4 hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark, from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2021. The duration of follow-up was 90 days. Eligibility criteria included a blood culture positive for growth of gram-negative bacteria, clinical stability within 4 days of initial blood culture, an available susceptibility report on day 4, and initiation of appropriate empirical IV antibiotic treatment within 24 hours of blood culture. Switching to oral antibiotics within 4 days after initial blood culture compared with continuing IV antibiotic treatment for at least 5 days after initial blood culture. The main outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for confounding. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed using pooled logistic regression to estimate absolute risk, risk difference (RD), and risk ratio (RR); 95% CIs were computed using bootstrapping. A total of 914 individuals were included in the target trial emulation analysis (512 [56.0%] male; median age, 74.5 years [IQR, 63.3-83.2 years]); 433 (47.4%) transitioned early to oral antibiotic treatment, and 481 (52.6%) received prolonged IV treatment. Ninety-nine individuals (10.8%) died during follow-up. The proportion of individuals who died was higher in the group receiving prolonged IV treatment (69 [14.3%] vs 30 [6.9%]). In the intention-to-treat analysis, 90-day all-cause mortality risk was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.7%-11.6%) for the early-switch group and 11.7% (95% CI, 9.6%-13.8%) for the group receiving prolonged IV treatment; the RD was -2.5% (95% CI, -5.7% to 0.7%) and RR was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-1.10). In the per-protocol analysis, the RD was -0.1% (95% CI, -3.4% to 3.1%) and RR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.70-1.40). In this cohort study of uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia, early transition to oral antibiotics within 4 days of initial blood culture was associated with 90-day all-cause mortality risk comparable to that of continuing IV antibiotic treatment and may be an effective alternative to prolonged IV treatment.

Influence of prior treatment protocol on intravitreal dexamethasone implant behavior in patients with diabetic macular edema in real-world practice

ABSTRACT Background and Objective Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEXI) has been placed as an effective option to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). However, there is no consensus on the best time to introduce it. We conducted a study to evaluate anatomical and functional behavior after the first DEXI according to previous treatment. Research design and methods This retrospective, real-world study between 2013 and 2020 investigated changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT at months 2 and 6 after the first DEXI in DME. Patients were divided into naive, early switch (≤3 anti-VEGF injections), or late switch (>3 anti-VEGF injections) groups. Results Among 112 consecutive eyes, mean BCVA and CMT improved significantly in all groups at month 2, with no difference between them. However, this improvement was not maintained at 6 months. The Naíve group presented better BCVA all over the study period. The previously treated groups, which started with worse initial visual acuity, showed more visual gain without reaching the BCVA of the naive group. CMT performance was similar between groups. Conclusions There was similar anatomical and functional behavior in all groups. Poorer visual acuity at baseline was associated with worse functional outcome despite good anatomic response.

Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection. In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77). Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29). Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.