Treatment Of Early-stage Breast Cancer Research Articles

Breast cancer stem cells origins and the memory stem cells: clinical significance of biomarkers and the active therapeutic approaches

Despite recent improvements in diagnosis and treatment, breast cancer (BC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths among women. In this complex disease, breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) are a small but significant subset of different cancer cells with the ability to proliferate and self-renew. According to an increasing amount of studies, BCSCs are essential for breast cancer metastasis, drug resistance, and recurrence. Due to its diverse nature, BC includes numerous subtypes, each of which displays unique BCSC types and concentrations that are connected to different therapy outcomes and outcomes. Despite significant advancements in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, there are still few effective therapy approaches for metastatic BC. The development, progression, and dissemination of BC are largely attributed to cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), which are characterized by their exceptional adaptability and self-renewal ability. An overview of the development of BCSCs, their biomarkers, clinical significance, and the mechanisms behind their behavior is the goal of the current study. The active therapy strategies being employed to address BCSCs will also be examined.

The Efficacy Research of Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF in Preventing Neutropenia in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis

PurposeDocetaxel-based chemotherapy regimens (DBRs) are commonly used in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer (EBC). The prophylactic use of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) has been shown to reduce the incidence of neutropenia induced by DBRs. However, the clinical usage of PEG-rhG-CSF in EBC patients undergoing DBRs in China remains unclear. MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted in 137 EBC patients receiving DBRs from September 2022 to February 2024. We compared the incidence of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) between patients who was treated with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF or not by complete blood counts, evaluating the effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing CIN. Prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF was given at 100 μg/kg body weight (maximum total dosage of 6 mg) once 24–48 h following chemotherapy. Meanwhile, we also collected basic patient information, the area under time-concentration curve of docetaxel, and liver and kidney function indicators. Multivariate logistic regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to explore independent factors influencing neutropenia. FindingsIn this study, 87 of 137 EBC patients were administrated with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF, while 50 were not. Compared to patients who did not receive PEG-rhG-CSF, those who received prophylactic injections had a significantly lower incidence of grade 3–4 CIN (20% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.05). Higher body surface area (BSA), lower body mass index (BMI), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and nonprophylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF were found to be positively correlated with CIN occurrence. ROC curve analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.756 for predicting CIN in EBC patients when BSA was 1.66 m², BMI was 24.8 kg/m², and ALT was 41 U/L, with a sensitivity of 73.08% and specificity of 73.87%. ImplicationsProphylactic use of PEG-rhG-CSF significantly reduces the incidence of CIN, particularly grades 3 and 4. BSA, BMI, ALT, and PEG-rhG-CSF prophylaxis are independent influencing factors for the occurrence of neutropenia.

[Artículo traducido] Efectividad y seguridad del tratamiento neoadyuvante del cáncer de mama triple negativo en la vida real

ObjectiveTriple-negative breast cancer is a subtype of aggressive breast cancer. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant treatment in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer and to identify predictors of pathological complete response. MethodsThis is a single-center, retrospective study involving 79 patients with triple-negative breast cancer who initiated neoadjuvant treatment between January 2017 and October 2022. Descriptive analyses were performed as appropriate. Statistical analysis utilized bivariate logistic regression to explore the presence of factors related to pathological complete response, and the Kaplan–Meier method was employed for survival analysis. ResultsIn the overall population, 27 patients (n = 78; 34.6%) achieved pathological complete response in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, and 31 (n = 73; 42.5%) achieved a grade 5 pathological complete response in the breast, according to the Miller and Payne classification. The addition of platinum to standard therapy improved both breast and axillary lymph node pathological complete response rates. Age less than 40 years was identified as a predictor of pathological complete response in our study population through bivariate analysis, while Ki67 levels lower than 70% were associated with a lower pathological complete response rate. Adverse events were reported in 72 patients (91.1%), with grade 3–5 adverse events observed in 33 (41.8%). There was a particularly notable increase in gastrointestinal and hematological adverse events when platinum was added. ConclusionsIn this population, we observed moderate rates of pathological complete response with acceptable chemotherapy tolerance. Platinum-based chemotherapy appears to enhance the likelihood of achieving pathological complete response, albeit with a less favorable safety profile. Therefore, evaluating the benefit–risk balance is crucial when selecting the optimal chemotherapy regimen for individual patients.

Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.

Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to improve both oncologic and aesthetic outcomes by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques. Using breast reduction techniques in breast cancer treatment has been shown to allow for wider margins of excision, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the surgical and oncological outcomes of a large cohort of patients undergoing oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM). A retrospective analysis of postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes of all patients who underwent ORM at a single center between January 2018 and December 2023 was performed. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. A total of 67 patients that underwent oncologic breast reduction were included in the final analysis - representing a total of 71 ORM, with a mean (SD) age of 53.1 (10.5) years and a mean (SD) BMI of 28.8 (5.9) kg/m2 A superomedial pedicle-based technique was the most frequently used (36.6%), followed by inferior pedicle-based technique (28.1%). A complication rate of 18.3% on the ipsilateral side was observed. Salvage surgery was necessary in five cases (7.0%) due to positive margins - with one patient (1.4%) requiring margin expansion surgery and four (5.6%) a completion mastectomy. This monocentric retrospective study shows that ORM is safe, with a complication rate on par with conventional breast reduction and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes.

BP04 Presentation Time: 4:27 PM: Intra-Operative Electronic Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Primary Endpoint Analysis of a Multi-Institution Trial

BP04 Presentation Time: 4:27 PM: Intra-Operative Electronic Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Primary Endpoint Analysis of a Multi-Institution Trial

6931 Weight Trends and Predictors of Weight Gain in Breast Cancer Survivors

Abstract Disclosure: M.D. Hurtado: None. E. Tama: None. D. Hodge: None. A. Weston: None. S. Fahad: None. K. Ruddy: None. J. Olson: None. F. Coach: None. R. Carter: None. S. D'Andre: None. A. Acosta: Consulting Fee; Self; Amgen Inc. Grant Recipient; Self; Vivus USA, Novo Nordisk. C. Shufelt: None. Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women. Weight gain after treatment for early-stage BC is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Excess adiposity is also a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of non-BC related death in BC survivors. This study aimed to describe weight trends in a large cohort of BC survivors and to identify predictors of weight gain after BC diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of BC survivors from the prospectively consented Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Registry, which has enrolled &amp;gt;10,000 patients seen at least once at Mayo Clinic Rochester for a BC diagnosed within the prior year. We extracted data on weights at baseline, and years 1, 4, and 6 after BC diagnosis to generate longitudinal weight trajectory curves on the change from baseline. Weights were either reported by patients in the registry questionnaires or extracted from the electronic health records. We identified BC survivors with weight gain &amp;gt;10% from baseline weight at years 1, 4, and 6. We then conducted univariable logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of &amp;gt;10% weight gain. Variables considered included: demographics, anthropometrics, BC clinical and pathologic characteristics, BRCA 1 and 2 genetic mutation status, and treatment (surgery, neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy). Results: We included 4744 BC survivors, mostly white (95%) and non-Hispanic (91%), with a mean age and weight at BC diagnosis of 58 ± 13 years and 76 ± 18 kg. Most patients had clinical stage I (43%) and ER+ and PR+ BC (83% and 76%, respectively). Most patients underwent breast preserving surgery (62%), half received radiation (54%), one third (36%) received systemic chemotherapy, and two thirds (61%) received endocrine therapy. At one year after BC diagnosis the average weight change was negligible compared to baseline (mean difference -0.2 ± 8 kg), but there were small but significant average increases by years 4 and 6 (0.5 ± 9 kg, p=0.002; and 0.8 ± 10 kg, p&amp;lt;0.001; respectively). At years 1, 4, and 6, the percentage of BC survivors gaining &amp;gt;10% of their baseline weight was 10%, 15%, and 18%, respectively. Baseline characteristics associated with &amp;gt;10% weight gain at 6 years included lower baseline weight (p&amp;lt;0.001), younger age at BC diagnosis (p&amp;lt;0.001), more advanced clinical and pathologic BC stage (p=0.008), ER+ and PR+ tumor biology (p=0.02 for both), BRCA2 mutation (p&amp;lt;0.001), mastectomy (compared to breast preserving surgeries, p=0.008), the use of systemic chemotherapy treatment (p&amp;lt;0.001), and the use of endocrine therapy (p=0.03). Conclusion: While most BC survivors do not experience weight gain after survivorship, 1 out 5 may experience excessive weight gain of more than 10%. Baseline anthropometric and BC-related variables are associated with excessive weight gain and could be used as predictors of weight gain in this population. Presentation: 6/3/2024

Updates in Systemic Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Hormone-receptor positive (HR +) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative early breast cancer (eBC) is a heterogeneous disease with several contributing factors for increased risk of recurrence, including tumor features, individual biomarkers, and genomic risk. The current standard approach in the management of HR + /HER2neg eBC includes chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (ET), and additional therapies based on risk profile, menopausal status, and genetics are sometimes appropriate. The risk of recurrence is more pronounced in patients with high-risk eBC including large tumor size, nodal involvement, high proliferative index, and genetic predisposition. In premenopausal patients with high-risk eBC, ovarian function suppression in combination with adjuvant ET improves survival. In postmenopausal patients, extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy can be considered. Recent trials have identified novel treatment approaches to reduce the risk of recurrence in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC including the addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors to adjuvant ET. For patients with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, adjuvant poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been shown to improve overall survival (OS). However, despite these recent advances, the risk of recurrence remains substantial, highlighting an area of unmet need. There are several ongoing clinical trials further investigating the role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapy in high-risk HR + /HER2neg eBC.

Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies, affecting millions of people worldwide annually. The treatment paradigm for early-stage breast cancer is in flux. The focus is now on opportunities to de-escalation treatment to minimize morbidity and maximize patients' quality of life. Recently, percutaneous minimally invasive ablative techniques have been explored. Early trials in small population of patients demonstrated cryoablation to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated in an outpatient setting. Subsequent surgical resection was performed and the ablation success rate was the highest if the tumor was less than 1.5 cm and with < 25% ductal carcinoma in situ component. ACOSOG Alliance Z1072, a phase II trial with curative intent, demonstrated 100% ablation in all tumors smaller than 1 cm and 92% success in lesions without multifocal disease and less than 2 cm in size. There are ongoing prospective clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of cryoablation without surgical excision for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. FROST (Freezing Instead of Removal Of Small Tumors) started in 2016 is ongoing, ICE3 (Cryoablation of Low Risk Small Breast Cancer) started in 2014 just released 5 years results, and COOL-IT: Cryoablation vs Lumpectomy in T1 Breast Cancers is also ongoing. These prospective trials will expand our knowledge on the safety and value of cryoablation. It is crucial to understand the indications, technical nuances, and distinctive imaging findings for cryoablation as it has potential to revolutionize standard surgical practice.

Reductions in recurrence in women with early breast cancer entering clinical trials between 1990 and 2009: a pooled analysis of 155 746 women in 151 trials

Distant recurrence in women with oestrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer persists at a constant rate for more than 20 years after diagnosis, with little equivalent data for oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Using the database of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) we investigated rates of distant breast-cancer recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours and trends in outcomes over time. In this pooled analysis of randomised controlled trial data, patients in the EBCTCG database of more than 650 000 women in trials of treatment for early-stage breast cancer were screened for eligibility. Women were eligible if they were enrolled between 1990 and 2009 and newly diagnosed with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and scheduled for at least 5 years of endocrine therapy, or oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and if they were younger than 75 years at diagnosis, had a tumour diameter of 50 mm or less, and fewer than ten positive axillary lymph nodes, and no evidence of distant metastases at entry. Trial of neoadjuvant therapy, or those in which adjuvant therapy was unclear, and women with oestrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive disease, or those for whom outcome or baseline data were missing were excluded. The primary outcome was time to first distant recurrence as defined by each trial, ignoring any locoregional recurrence or contralateral breast cancer. 10-year risks of distant recurrence by period of diagnosis were compared using Cox regression adjusted for patient and tumour characteristics, trial, and assigned treatment. Of the 652 258 women with early breast cancer in the EBCTCG database on Jan 17, 2023, patient-level data were available from 151 randomised trials that included 155 746 women. Rates of distant tumour recurrence improved similarly in women with oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. 80·5% of the improvement for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 89·8% of the improvement for eostrogen receptor-negative disease was explained by changes in patient and tumour characteristics and improved treatments, but remained significant (p<0·0001). More recently diagnosed patients were more likely to have node-negative disease. 10-year distant recurrence risks during 1990-99 versus 2000-09 were as follows: for node-negative disease, 10·1% versus 7·3% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 18·3% versus 11·9% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease; for disease with one to three positive nodes, 19·9% versus 14·7% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 31·9% versus 22·1% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease; and for disease with four to nine positive nodes, 39·6% versus 28·5% for oestrogen receptor-positive disease and 47·8% versus 36·5% for oestrogen receptor-negative disease. After adjustment for therapy, rates were reduced by 25% (oestrogen receptor-positive disease) and 19% (oestrogen receptor-negative disease) after 2000 versus the 1990s, with similar improvements observed in oestrogen receptor-positive disease beyond 5 years. Most of the improvement in trial outcomes is explained by a greater proportion of women with lower-risk disease entering trials and improved adjuvant treatment. After adjustment, women diagnosed since 2000 have about a fifth lower rate of distant recurrence than the 1990s. Long-term risks of distant recurrence for oestrogen receptor-positive disease remain, but are about a tenth lower now than in our previous report. Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.

Risk Factors for Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer-Retrospective Analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to identify preoperative factors that could be associated with positive resection margins. We also tried to analyze the local recurrence and overall survival in patients who received conservative treatment for early-stage breast cancer and correlate these parameters with preoperative factors. A retrospective examination was conducted on the medical records and pathological reports of 143 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in our department from 2009 to 2017. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through phone contact and statistical analyses, including GraphPad Prism, and Fisher's exact test, the Chi-square test, and the log-rank test were employed. The results revealed positive resection margins in 7.69% (11 cases) of the 143 patients, with an overall mortality rate of 16.66% for those with positive margins and 6.59% for those with negative margins. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the overall (p = 0.5) or specific (p = 0.53) survival between the positive and negative margin groups. The positive margins were significantly associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) and the presence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (p = 0.01). Among the analyzed factors, two out of sixteen were significantly linked to positive resection margins in BCS, emphasizing their importance in surgical management planning for early-stage breast cancer.

The landscape of use of NCCN-guideline chemotherapy regimens in stage I-IIIA breast cancer in an integrated healthcare delivery system.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend a variety of drug combinations with specific administration schedulesfor the treatment ofearly-stagebreast cancer, allowing physicians to deliver treatments recognizing individual patient complexities, including comorbidities, and patient-physician preference. While use of guideline regimens has shifted over time, there is little data to describe changes in how treatment for early-stage breast cancer has evolved over time. In a cohort of 34,109 women treated for stage I-IIIA breast cancer between 2006-2019 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Washington, we present the changes in chemotherapy regimens over time, and explore use of NCCN-guideline regimens (GR), guideline regimens used when said regimens were not included in guidelines, referred to as time-discordant regimens (TDR), and non-guideline regimens (NGR). Results are presented by drug combination and over time. Among 12,506 women receiving chemotherapy, 77.4% (n = 9681) received GRs, 9.1% (n = 1140) received TDRs, and 13.5% (n = 1685) received NGRs. In 2006, AC-T (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin, paclitaxel) was the most common regimen, with TC (cyclophosphamide-docetaxel) becoming the most prevalent by 2019. NGRs were more common in cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF); cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-paclitaxel-trastuzumab (ACTH); and paclitaxel-trastuzumab (TH). The use of GR has increased over time (p-trend < 0.001), while use of NGR(both in terms of administration schedule and drug combination)and TDRhave decreased, although patterns vary by drug combination. Chemotherapy delivery has changed markedly over time, with a move toward more use of GR. These data are important for understanding the landscape of chemotherapy delivery in community healthcare settings.

Comparison of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic breast-conserving surgery (E-BCS) compared to conventional breast cancer surgery (C-BCS) in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL) were searched published from establishment of database to January 30,2024, for articles studying E-BCS compared to C-BCS in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Meta-analyses of procedure time, blood loss, length of incision, drainage duration, total postoperative drainage volume, average duration of hospital stay, positive rate of margin, complication rate, recurrence rate, metastasis rate and cosmetic scoring were performed. Totally 11 studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with C-BCS, E-BCS exhibited significantly reduced incision length (WMD = -6.44, 95%CI: -10.78 to -2.11, P=0.004, I2 = 99.0%) and superior cosmetic scoring (WMD = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.46 to 3.93, P=0.001, I2 = 93.2%), but had significantly longer operation time (WMD = 34.22, 95%CI: 20.89~47.55, P=0.000, I2 = 90.7%) and blood loss (WMD = 3.65, 95%CI: -3.12 to 10.43, P=0.291, I2 = 86.8%). There was no significant difference in terms of recurrence rate, metastasis rate, positive rate of tumor resection margins, drainage duration, drainage volume, complication rate and hospital days. Our research findings indicate that E-BCS is a viable and secure method for treating breast cancer in its early stages. E-BCS provides distinct advantages in terms of the length of the incision and the aesthetic result, without demonstrating an elevated recurrence rate or metastasis rate. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024535164, identifier CRD42024535164.

Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment and Continued as a Single Agent Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Hong Kong.

The phaseIII randomized KEYNOTE-522 trial demonstrated that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab + chemotherapy) provided significant improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with high-risk early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC). The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab + chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy) in patients with high-risk eTNBC from a Hong Kong third-party payer perspective. A multistate transition model with four health states (event-free), locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and death) was developed to assess the lifetime medical costs and health outcomes (3% annual discount), along with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using efficacy and safety data from the KEYNOTE-522 trial. The health state utilities were derived from KEYNOTE-522 Euro-QoL-five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) data. Costs were expressed in 2022 Hong Kong dollars (HKD).Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. Over a 32-year time horizon, base case results showed that pembrolizumab + chemotherapy was associated with a 3.42year longer EFS and expected gains of 3.05 lifeyears (LYs) and 2.45 quality-adjusted lifeyears (QALYs) compared to chemotherapy. The resultant ICERs were HKD135,200 per QALY gained and HKD108,463 per LY gained, which were lower than the World Health Organization (WHO) cost-effectiveness threshold of three times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita for Hong Kong of HKD1,171,308 per QALY. The one-way sensitivity analyses (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) showed the results were robust across various inputs and alternative scenarios. On the basis of the analysis conducted for a 56-year-old cohort with high-risk eTNBC and assumptions in the model, pembrolizumab + chemotherapy represents a cost-effective proposition (as the ICER is approximately 35% of the GDP per capita in Hong Kong) for patients with high-risk eTNBC in Hong Kong.

Patient-reported convenience and effectiveness of telehealth for breast cancer management.

Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telehealth was rarely used for breast cancer management at tertiary care centers. We sought to examine patient satisfaction, experiences, preferences, and perceived effectiveness and technical quality of telehealth visits in follow-up patients receiving routine outpatient care in the breast medical oncology practice at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. We administered a survey to 60 follow-up patients for a duration of 9 months (January 5, 2021 to October 27, 2021) who had at least one telehealth consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic, from April 10, 2020 to October 21, 2021. Descriptive statistics were then generated for each question, each domain, and overall survey scores. Subgroup comparisons within patient populations were done using the chi-square or t-test when appropriate. Among the 60 participants, 49 (82%) were undergoing standard follow-up during active treatment for either early-stage or metastatic breast cancer. Telehealth and in-person office visits were considered equivalent in terms of quality of communication by 43 participants (72%). Most participants (n = 49, 82%) felt equally cared for during telehealth and in-person visits, and 40 participants (67%) reported feeling connected to their healthcare professional during both telehealth and in-person visits. In addition, 28 participants (47%) felt that the duration of telehealth visits was similar to in-person visits, 46 (77%) found both telehealth and in-person visits equally comfortable for discussing sensitive topics, 39 (65%) considered telehealth visits convenient, and 42 (70%) perceived the overall quality of care for telehealth to be similar to that of in-person visits. Participants expressed high satisfaction with telehealth appointments, with 42 (70%) rating their experience as very satisfying. Most participants (n = 44, 73%) expressed a strong likelihood of participating in telehealth appointments for breast cancer follow-up care in the future. Our results indicate that telehealth can serve as an effective and satisfactory approach for delivering healthcare services to patients with breast cancer requiring follow-up care. The positive experiences and willingness to continue using telehealth indicate its potential for improving access to care and patient outcomes.

Effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in different quadrants

To compare the effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery (SMPSL-BCS) in treating early-stage breast cancer patients with tumors in different quadrants. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 early-stage breast cancer female patients admitted between January 2023 and December 2023. According to the quadrant where the tumor was located, the patients were allocated into the upper outer quadrant group (UO group), lower outer quadrant group (LO group), upper inner quadrant group (UI group), and lower inner quadrant group (LI group), with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in the baseline data, including age, body mass index, smoking history, marital status, comorbidities, affected breast side, maximum tumor diameter on ultrasound, maximum pathological tumor diameter, clinical tumor stage, molecular subtype, and disease duration. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and extubation time were recorded and compared between groups. Additionally, the occurrence of early-stage complications (1-3 months after operation; including subcutaneous fluid accumulation, incision infection, superficial skin burns) and late-stage complications (>3 months after operation; including pectoralis major muscle adhesion, changes in breast appearance and shape, sensory discomfort) were assessed. At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcome of breast-conserving surgery was rated for all groups. The UO group had the shortest operation time, followed by the UI group, LO group, and LI group, showing significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). The UO group had the least intraoperative blood loss, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between UO group and LO group, which was not significant ( P>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( P<0.05). The UO group had the least postoperative drainage volume, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between LO group and UI group, which was not significant ( P>0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( P<0.05). The extubation time of the LI group was significantly longer than that of the other groups ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 4-12 months, with an average of 8 months. And 193 patients were followed up more than 6 months, including 48 patients in UO group, 47 in LO group, 49 in UI group, and 49 in LI group. In the early-stage period, the LI group had a higher incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation after tube removal compared to the UO group and LO group ( P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidences of other early complications between groups ( P>0.05). In the late-stage period, the LI group had significantly higher incidences of pectoralis major muscle adhesion and changes in breast appearance and shape than UO group and LO group ( P<0.05), and a significantly higher incidence of sensory discomfort than UO group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidences of other late-stage complications between groups ( P>0.05). At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery were significantly better in UO group, LO group, and UI group than in LI group ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P>0.05). In the treatment of early-stage breast cancer using SMPSL-BCS, patients with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant show the best effectiveness. The effectivenesses are similar for patients with tumors in the lower outer and upper inner quadrants. However, patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant do not experience significant advantages. Therefore, it is recommended that SMPSL-BCS should not be the first-choice surgical method for patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant.

U.S. payer budget impact of using an AI-augmented cancer risk discrimination digital histopathology platform to identify high-risk of recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer

Aims Use of gene expression signatures to predict adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in women with early-stage breast cancer is increasing. However, high cost, limited access, and eligibility for these tests results in the adoption of less precise assessment approaches. This study evaluates the cost impact of PreciseDx Breast (PDxBr), an AI-augmented histopathology platform that assesses the 6-year risk of recurrence in early-stage invasive breast cancer patients to help improve informed use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and methods A decision-tree Markov model was developed to compare the costs of treatment guided by standard of care (SOC) risk assessment (i.e. clinical diagnostic workup with or without Oncotype DX) versus PDxBr with SOC in a hypothetical cohort of U.S. women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. A commercial payer perspective compares costs of testing, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, adverse events, surveillance, and end-of-life care. Results PDxBr use in prognostic evaluation resulted in savings of $4 million (M) in year one compared to current SOC in 1 M females members. Over 6-years, savings increased to $12.5 M. The per-treated patient costs in year one amounted to $19.5 thousand (K) for SOC and $16.9K for PDxBr. Limitations For simplicity, recurrence was not specified. We performed scenario analyses to account for variations in rates for local, regional, and distant recurrence. Second, a recurrent patient incurs the total cost of treated recurrence in the first year and goes back to remission or death. Third, CDK4/6i treatment is only incorporated in the recurrence costs but not in the first line of treatment for early-stage breast cancer due to limited data. Conclusions Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robust overall savings to changes in all variables in the model. The use of PDxBr to assess breast cancer recurrence risk has the potential to fill gaps in care and reduce costs when gene expression signatures are not available.

Distress, Pain, and Nausea on Postoperative Days 1 and 14 in Women Recovering From Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Repeated-Measures Study.

To determine the incidence and trajectory of distress, pain, and nausea and vomiting at postoperative day (POD) 1 and at POD 14 following breast-conserving surgery. 75 women aged 18 years or older receiving breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy for treatment of early-stage primary breast cancer at an ambulatory surgery center. This prospective, repeated-measures study assessed distress, pain, and nausea and vomiting using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and Problem List on POD 1 and POD 14. Pain and distress scores were highest on POD 1. The number of women who reported depression increased from POD 1 to POD 14. Thematic analysis revealed that family concerns, fears and worries, and postoperative issues contributed to pain and distress. Women experience pain and distress during recovery at home after breast-conserving surgery. Nurses can use these results to apply evidence-based practice to reduce this symptom burden. Future nursing research should focus on targeted interventions outside of the hospital setting.

Use of an AI-powered visualization platform to support precision clinical decision-making in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

e12618 Background: Chemotherapy to reduce cancer burden and tumor size ("downstaging") is widely used in neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) and can have a dramatic impact on selection of further treatment courses, including surgery. The resulting decision-making process between physicians and cancer patients requires detailed and effective communication of the patient's disease status, and clear presentation of this information in Tumor Board settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) -powered visualization platforms offer the potential to aid in evaluating breast tumor location and morphology, and accordingly optimize treatment. Additionally, these tools offer enhanced communication with patients regarding future treatment options, particularly serving as clinical decision support (CDS) tools. Methods: We assessed the performance of an AI platform that employs dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to render three-dimensional (3D) visualizations of breast tumors and 5 additional chest tissues on an independent validation dataset comprise of 100 ESBC cases with ground-truth tumor labels vetted by 2 breast-specialized radiologists. The platform provides 3D depictions of the tumor and its multi-tissue context, as well as functionalities for quantifying tumor morphology, tumor-to-landmark structure distances, excision volumes, and approximate surgical margins. We subsequently evaluated the tool's utility in a real-world setting to understand how the tool impacts clinical decision-making and patient communication, specifically around surgical planning in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Results: The platform generated accurate 3D tumor maps, as evidenced by a median Dice score of 75.6% and a median Hausdorff distances of 15.1 mm relative to the radiologist validation set. The automatic longest tumor dimension calculations were linearly correlated with radiologist direct measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.78) and had a median absolute difference of 6.3 mm. We found strong overlap between the platform’s ground-truth convex hulls, as shown by a median Dice score of 81.5%. When used by a skilled breast-specialized surgeon, the tool enabled rapid and intuitive patient-physician communication of the location and extent of disease, and potential degrees of downstaging to breast-conserving surgery. Conclusions: Detailed 3D tumor and surrounding multi-tissue depictions offer both qualitative and quantitative comprehension of cancer topology and may aid in formulating an optimal treatment approach for breast cancer treatment. We show that detailed depictions enhance communication between physicians and patients and may aid in streamlining decision-making.

Retrospective study on the profile of patients undergoing intraoperative radiotherapy with INTRABEAM for breast cancer treatment at a Brazilian cancer center.

e12538 Background: Conservative breast therapy combined with adjuvant radiotherapy has been the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer for many decades. Considering that most breast cancer recurrences occur near the original tumor site, partial breast radiotherapy has become an alternative for patients in this scenario, allowing for a single-dose radiation application directly to the tumor site. This technique has advantages such as reducing local toxicity and improving the quality of life for treated patients, in addition to decreasing the waiting time for radiotherapy treatment in developing countries like ours. Our case series is the largest in Latin America to date, and we believe that reporting the results of our experience will be valuable for the scientific community and aid in treatment decision-making in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: This is a retrospective study based on data from the medical records of 209 patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy at A.C. Camargo Cancer Center (São Paulo, Brazil) from 2016 to 2023. Results: In our cohort, 88.5% of tumors were invasive ductal carcinomas. The majority were T1b (41.8%), had histological grade 2 (45.4%), nuclear grade 2 (62.7%), and showed no axillary involvement (87.6%). All patients received intraoperative radiotherapy in a single dose of 20 Gy radiation at the tumor site with a voltage of 50 kV. In our study, 17.7% of patients required additional external radiotherapy due to postoperative histopathological findings inconsistent with treatment indication criteria, including 35.3% for micrometastasis and 32.4% for nodal macrometastasis, 10.8% for narrow or compromised margins, 10.8% for histological types not covered in the final report, 2.7% for multifocality, 2.7% for extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, 2.7% for negative progesterone receptor, and 2.7% for the presence of lymphatic vascular invasion. The average follow-up time for patients was 36 months. The local recurrence rate was 0.5%. Conclusions: The results of this study support established data indicating the efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer treatment. Therefore, for carefully selected patients, this technique with should be considered as a treatment option. We will continue to follow this patient cohort to identify the occurrence of late recurrences and publish long-term follow-up data.

Pooled analysis of NeoCARH and NeoCART trials: patient-reported outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Anthracycline-based or platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy belongs to the standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer (EBC) that is either triple-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +). Currently, there is a paucity of data comparing their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Triple-negative or HER2 + EBC from our two prospective randomized controlled trials, neoCARH and neoCART, were divided into two groups based on the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens they received: anthracycline-based or platinum-based group. HRQoL was the exploratory endpoint in these two trials, which was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Core30 and Breast23 questionnaires. The primary variable of interest was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc). Assessments were carried out at baseline, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 1year and 2years after diagnosis. The mean questionnaires' compliance rate was 95.0%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 210 patients had evaluable HRQoL data, the mean least square change from baseline for the platinum-based group was - 15.997 (95% confidence interval (CI): - 17.877 to - 14.117), and it was - 20.156 (95% CI: - 22.053 to - 18.258) for the anthracycline-based group (difference: 4.159, 95% CI: 1.462 to 6.855, P = 0.003, minimal important difference = 3). For the majority of the domains of interest assessed by the C30 and BR23 questionnaires, the platinum-based group demonstrated superior outcomes in comparison to the anthracycline-based group. Patients receiving platinum-based or anthracycline-based regimens both experienced worsened HRQoL after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the former provided relatively better HRQoL compared with the latter. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03140553. Registered 4 May 2017 (neoCARH). NCT03154749. Registered 16 May 2017 (neoCART).