Early Removal Of Urethral Catheter Research Articles

Role of pelvic drain and timing of urethral catheter removal following RARP: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To assess the clinical value of routine pelvic drain (PD) placement and early removal of urethral catheter (UC) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as perioperative management such as the necessity of PD or optimal timing for UC removal remains highly variable. Multiple databases were searched for articles published before March 2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they investigated the differential rate of postoperative complications between patients with/without routine PD placement and with/without early UC removal, defined as UC removal at 2-4 days after RARP. Overall, eight studies comprising 5112 patients were eligible for the analysis of PD placement, and six studies comprising 2598 patients were eligible for the analysis of UC removal. There were no differences in the rate of any complications (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.00), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III; pooled OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.69), all and/or symptomatic lymphocele (pooled OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50-1.33; and pooled OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26-1.29, respectively) between patients with or without routine PD placement. Furthermore, avoiding PD placement decreased the rate of postoperative ileus (pooled OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.91). Early removal of UC resulted in an increased likelihood of urinary retention (OR 6.21, 95% CI 3.54-10.9) in retrospective, but not in prospective studies. There were no differences in anastomosis leakage and early continence rates between patients with or those without early removal of UC. There is no benefit for routine PD placement after standard RARP in the published articles. Early removal of UC seems possible with the caveat of the increased risk of urinary retention, while the effect on medium-term continence is still unclear. These data may help guide the standardisation of postoperative procedures by avoiding unnecessary interventions, thereby reducing potential complications and associated costs.

Early removal of urethral catheter after endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy

Background. Extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer is useful when there are no oncological indications to lymph node dissection (e.g. in low and intermediate-low risk of the disease), and allows to perform precise anastomosis and facilitates the early postoperative period. However, even minimally invasive approach does not avoid such factors as a urinary catheter that may disturb patients.Objective. We assessed the possibility to remove the urinary catheter as early as possible.Materials and methods. 28 patients with low (n = 22) and low-intermediate (n = 6) prostate cancer risk (according to NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) criteria) underwent an extraperitoneal laparoscopic RP from March 2017 to November 2018. All operations were performed by the same surgeon (A. Nosov). The inclusion criteria were the following: localized prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen (PSA) <10 ng/ml, ISUP group 1–2, life expectancy of more than 10 years and preoperative patient’s counseling (awareness about early catheter removal and discharge). All patients were continent before surgery. During surgery, the prostate and seminal vesicles were removed extraperitoneally without peritoneal cavity opening and conversion. Bladder neck sparing was performed in all cases but nerve-vascular bundles were spared according to indication (preoperative International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), oncological reasons). Vesicourethral anastomosis was performed by two V-Loc circular sutures. No drainage tubes were inserted to control bleeding/urinary leakage. A urinary catheter Foley 20 Fr was inserted into the bladder after anastomosis completion. No other urinary drainage (suprapubic tubes, etc) was used. Anastomosis resistance and completeness were checked at the end of surgery by filling the bladder with 150 ml of saline through the catheter. Except for cases with macroscopic hematuria, urinary catheters were removed on the 1st postoperative day’s morning (<24 hours) with an active followup (daily voiding assessment, pelvic ultrasound and postvoided residual volume assessment) on Day 1. Immediately after the catheter removal, alpha-blockers (for urination alleviation) and PDE-5 inhibitors (in patients with neurovascular sparing) were prescribed. All patients were available for a 3-month follow-up. During the follow-up, a monthly combined assessment was performed, including IPSS, QoL, PSA analysis, pelvic ultrasound and urofloumetry.Results. The average patient’s age was 63 years (52–71 years). The median preoperative PSA level was 7.6 ng/ml. The intraoperative technique was unremarkable with no blood transfusion or conversion. All early postoperative complications were classified as minor – grade I, II and IIIa in 2 (7.2 %), 5 (17.8 %) and 1 (3.6 %) patients, respectively. Related to the early catheter removal complications included 1 (3.6 %) patient with urinary leakage (resolved by repeated prolonged urinary catheter insertion) and 4 (14.3 %) with urinary obstruction – resolved by single catheterization (n = 2), percutaneous suprapubic cystostomy (n = 2). No major complications were noticed during the follow-up. Totally, 22 (78.6 %) patients were discharged on the next day after the catheter removal – on the 2nd postoperative day. All discharged patients did not need readmission during the follow-up. Remained 6 (21.4 %) patients stayed at the hospital for 5–18 days. The pathological investigation showed upgrading in 9 (32.1 %) patients with low risk and in 1 (3.6 %) patient with low-intermediate risk. Upstaging to locally advanced forms was noticed in 6 (21.4 %) patients. All patients had the PSA level of <0.2 ng/ml 30–90 days after surgery. Postoperative assessment showed improvement in urinary function and erectile function sparing in selected patients, with no compromising functional results due to the early catheter removal.Conclusion. Despite the common widespread of minimally invasive RP, there is no consensus on the terms of a urinary catheter removal. According to our data, we suggested it might be of some benefit to remove a urinary catheter early in selected and well-informed patients. A thorough vesicourethral anastomosis pursuance, nerve-sparing, bladder neck sparing and Retzius sparing procedure, intraand postoperative assessment is necessary in all cases.

Urethra and Ejaculation Preserving Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging-guided Madigan Technique

BackgroundWith the increasing adoption of novel technologies and anatomical techniques, surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) provides significant benefits in terms of obstruction relief, early urethral catheter removal, and faster return to daily activities. However, the main pitfall of BPH surgery in sexually active men remains ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD), which permanently affects quality of life. ObjectiveTo detail a novel technique for marking the intraprostatic urethra through a retrograde injection of indocyanine green to enhance selective dissection of prostatic lobes during urethra-sparing robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (US-RASP) with the use of near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIFI). Design, setting, and participantsBetween January and September 2017, 12 consecutive male patients, who had BPH, were sexually active, and were motivated to preserve ejaculatory function, underwent US-RASP. Surgical procedureUS-RASP with NIFI to enhance the identification and preservation of the prostatic urethra. MeasurementsClinical data were prospectively collected in our institutional RASP dataset. Perioperative and functional outcomes of US-RASP were both graded, and assessed according to Clavien grading system and validated questionnaires postoperatively (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]; Male Sexual Health Questionnaire on EjD [MSHQ-EjD] Short Form) at 3 and 12mo. Results and limitationsMedian preoperative prostate size was 102cc (interquartile range [IQR] 88–115). Median operative time was 150min (IQR 145–170). Median estimated blood loss was 250 (IQR 200–350). Continuous bladder irrigation was avoided in 83.4% of patients. Median time to catheter removal was 7d (IQR 7–7) with a median hospital stay of 3d (IQR 2–3). At 1-yr follow-up, median IPSS score, International Index of Erectile Function score, and MSHQ-EjD Short Form score were 5 (IQR 4–8), 26 (IQR 26–28), and 12 (IQR 1–14), respectively. Satisfactory anterograde ejaculation was reported in eight patients (66%). ConclusionsWe described a novel NIFI-guided technique to perform US-RASP. This technique showed promising early functional results, suggesting a significant role of intraprostatic urethral integrity for the preservation of ejaculatory function. Patient summaryWe developed a novel robotic technique to perform simple prostatectomy with integral preservation of the prostatic urethra. This technique provided a high rate of ejaculatory function preservation.

Does early removal of Foley’s catheter have any influence on infection of recipient post renal transplantation? Is it safe? A randomized clinical trial

Background: Kidney transplant is a fair option for treatment of a chronic renal failure. Although the outcome and results of kidney transplant are good, it may be associated with some complications. One of the important complications is urinary infection. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of early removal of the catheter in renal transplant patients on the reduction of urinary tract infections. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted as a clinical trial. Around 88 transplanted patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, the patients were taken 3 days after the transplant, and in the second group, patients were removed 7 days after the Foley catcher transplant. Urine culture was performed on two occasions. Then, the patients’ data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: After examination of urine and analyzing the results with t test, it showed that infection of urine in the time of removal of urethral catheter was lower than 7 days after removing urethral catheter (P<0.05). In patients in whom catheter of urethral had been removed 3 days after the operation, approximately urinary tract infection (UTI) was 50% less than those in whom urethral catheter was removed 7 days after the operation. Conclusions: Early removal of catheter has fundamental effects on UTI after kidney transplant and it seems that early removal of urethral catheter may be safe and reasonable in renal transplant of the recipient patient.

Urinary tract infections in kidney transplant recipients 1st year after transplantation.

Background:One of the main causes of adverse complications following kidney transplantation is urinary tract infection (UTI). This study was done to define the incidence rate, clinical profiles, causative microorganisms, and UTI risk factors among kidney transplant recipients in Mashhad city.Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study, we perused medical files of 247 kidney recipients who underwent transplant surgery at Mashhad University Montaserie Hospital, during 2012–2014. All patients were followed for UTI during the 1st year after surgery.Results:75 episodes of UTI developed by 152 pathogens in 56 (22.7%) of patients during 1-year follow-up. 26.6% of total UTIs were diagnosed within the 1st month after transplantation. The most frequently isolated uropathogens were Escherichia coli (55.3%, n = 84). The high rate of candiduria (8.5%) was observed, too.Conclusion:UTI is known as one of the hospitalization reasons in kidney transplantation recipients. Defining appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis against bacterial and fungal agents and early removal of urethral catheter are suggested to decrease posttransplantation complications.

Experience on Early Urethral Catheter Removal Following Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose: To assess outcomes from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and had their indwelling urinary catheter removed on postoperative day (POD) 4 or 7. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 107 consecutive patients receiving radical prostatectomy (RP), were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups according to length of catheterization. Group 1 (n=40) had the urethral catheter removed on postoperative day (POD) 4, and group 2 (n=67) had the catheter removed on POD7. Group 1 had urethral catheter removal following no leakage on intraoperative leak testing and POD4 cystography, whilst group 2 exhibited leakage at POD4 and instead had routine POD7 urethral catheter removal if there was evidence of no leakage of POD7 cystography. Incontinence was checked according to the use of protective pad. Results: The mean age of the study population was 67.0 years. acute urinary retension (AUR) following catheter removal occurred in 6 of the cohort (5.6%); 3 patients (7.5%) from group 1 and 3 (4.5%) from group 2 (p=0.669). The overall continence rate was 39.3%, 68.2%, 80.4%, and 91.6% at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Importantly, the incontinence recovery pace of group 1 was notably higher than that of group 2 (p=0.001). Neither group exhibited bladder neck contracture. Intraoperative factors influencing the decision to remove catheter at POD4 following RP, are bladder neck reconstruction (OR=3.792, p=0.010) and nerve sparing (OR=6.646, p=0.008). Conclusions: Selective early urethral catheter removal may shorten the length of incontinence recovery, without increasing the risk of AUR and bladder neck contracture.

Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Retrospective single institution data suggest that postoperative pain after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is decreased by early removal of the urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage. In a randomized patient population we determined whether suprapubic tube drainage with early urethral catheter removal would improve postoperative pain compared with urethral catheter drainage alone. Men with a body mass index of less than 40 kg/m(2) who had newly diagnosed prostate cancer and elected robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were included in analysis. Block randomization by surgeon was used and randomization assignment was done after completing the urethrovesical anastomosis. In patients assigned to suprapubic tube drainage the urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1 and all catheters were removed on postoperative day 7. Visual analog pain scale and satisfaction questionnaires were administered on postoperative days 0, 1 and 7. A total of 29 patients were randomized to the urethral catheter vs 29 to the suprapubic tube plus early urethral catheter removal at the time of interim futility analysis. Mean visual analog pain scale scores did not differ between the groups at any time point and a similar percent of patients cited the catheter as the greatest bother with nonsignificant differences in treatment related satisfaction. Complications during postoperative week 1 did not vary between the groups. Based on interim results the trial was terminated due to lack of effect. Patients randomized to suprapubic tube vs urethral catheter drainage for the week after prostatectomy had similar pain, catheter related bother and treatment related satisfaction in the perioperative period. We no longer routinely offer suprapubic tube drainage with early urethral catheter removal at our institution.

Risk and Prevention of Acute Urinary Retention After Robotic Prostatectomy

Acute urinary retention after catheter removal is a recognized complication following open or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. We evaluated patient and surgery related risk factors to determine whether acute urinary retention could be prevented. To our knowledge this has not previously been investigated for prostatectomy done by any technique. We reviewed a single surgeon, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy database of patients treated between February 2008 and June 2011 for acute urinary retention after catheter removal, which was routinely performed 3 to 7 days postoperatively. We compared the characteristics of patients with and without acute urinary retention. Of 1,026 patients 25 (2.4%) experienced acute urinary retention. There was no difference between patients with and without acute urinary retention in mean age, body mass index, blood loss or prostate size, and no difference in the frequency of bladder neck reconstruction or nerve sparing. The catheter was removed an average of 4.1 vs 5.7 days postoperatively in patients with vs without acute urinary retention. Of 25 patients with acute urinary retention 22 (88%) underwent catheter removal on postoperative day 3 or 4. Although only 3 of 381 patients (0.8%) had a leak on cystogram on postoperative day 3 or 4, the acute urinary retention rate when the catheter was removed on day 3 or 4 was 5.8% (22 of 381). This was several times higher than the rate in patients who retained the catheter for greater than 4 days (3 of 645 or 0.5%). Acute urinary retention develops infrequently after robotic prostatectomy. No patient related risk factors were identified beyond catheterization time. Although the catheter may be removed after 3 or 4 days with rare leaks, the acute urinary retention risk was much less when the catheter was left in place at least 5 days.

Safe Removal of the Urethral Catheter 2 Days Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose. To assess the risks and benefits of early urethral catheter removal following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods. Between June 2009 and April 2011, 114 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. Candidates for early removal of the urethral catheter were selected intraoperatively on the basis of the integrity of the vesicourethral anastamosis and the ease of recatheterisation. In the selected cohort of patients, the urethral catheter was removed at day 2. Recatheterisation rates within this group were recorded and analysed. Results. Of the 114 patients who underwent laparoscopic prostatectomy, 64 (56%) were deemed suitable for removal of catheter on second postoperative day prior to discharge. The first 20 patients selected for early removal of urethral catheter were covered with a suprapubic catheter inserted at the time of surgery. Out of 64 patients deemed suitable for early removal of urethral catheter, 53 (83%) were able to pass urine without complication. 11 patients (17%) developed urinary retention that necessitated recatheterisation. In all cases, reinsertion of catheter was performed easily and successfully without the need for cystoscopic guidance or adjuncts. Conclusions. Removal of the urethral catheter at day 2 following laparoscopic prostatectomy is a safe procedure in carefully selected patients.

Posttransplant infectious complications: a prospective study on 142 kidney allograft recipients.

We evaluated the posttransplant complications resulting from infections and their association with graft function, immunosuppressive drugs, and mortality. A total of 142 kidney allograft recipients were followed for 1 year after transplantation. The patients' status was assessed during regular visits, and data including clinical characteristics, infections, serum creatinine level, acute rejection episodes, immunosuppressive regimen, graft function, and mortality were recorded and analyzed. Infections occurred in 77 patients (54%). The lower urinary (42%) and respiratory (6.3%) tracts were the most common sites of infection. The most frequent causative organisms were Klebsiella in 34 (24%) and cytomegalovirus in 25 patients (18%). Wound infection occurred in 7 patients (5%). The mortality rate was 7.7% and infection-related death was seen in 5 patients (3.5%) who developed sepsis. Graft loss was seen in 16 patients (11%), of whom 2 developed cytomegalovirus infection, 2 experienced urinary tract infection, and 5 developed sepsis and died. Mycobacterial and hepatitis C infections were noticeably rare (0.7% and 2.8%, respectively). This study showed that infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality during the posttransplant period. We recommend that serologic tests be performed before and after transplantation to recognize and meticulously follow those who are at risk. In our study, high-risk patients were those with elevated serum creatinine levels who received high doses of immunosuppressive drugs. As the urinary tract is the most common site of infection, early removal of urethral catheter is recommended to reduce the risk of infection.

Early removal of urethral catheter following radical prostatectomy with the use of biological surgical adhesive at the vesico-urethral anastomosis

Early removal of urethral catheter following radical prostatectomy with the use of biological surgical adhesive at the vesico-urethral anastomosis

Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: A pilot study

Objectives Postoperative urethral catheter drainage after radical prostatectomy is bothersome to patients. A pilot study was initiated to determine if urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge is feasible. Methods Thirty-three consecutive men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy were prospectively studied and followed for a minimum of 6 months (mean, 8.5). Postoperative cystography was utilized to direct early catheter removal. Results Of 33 patients, 27 (82%) underwent successful catheter removal at a mean of 4.2 postoperative days. No patient experienced urinary retention, urinoma development, pelvic abscess, or anastomotic stricture. Urinary continence is excellent (no pads required) in 70% and good (stress incontinence requiring 1 to 2 pads/24 hours) in 18% of patients at last follow-up. Conclusions Following radical prostatectomy, early catheter removal prior to hospital discharge is feasible. Early results suggest no deleterious consequences. Prospective monitoring of more patients is needed to determine if this practice is widely applicable.

Cystography after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical implications of abnormal findings.

In many institutions, cystography is obtained routinely after radical retropubic prostatectomy to assess the integrity of the vesicourethral anastomosis before the removal of the catheter. This study presents the Indiana experience with cystograms performed following radical retropubic prostatectomy. The experience with 260 cystograms performed in 245 consecutive patients following radical retropubic prostatectomy was reviewed retrospectively, with a special reference to the clinical implications of abnormal findings. After a standard catheterization period of 14 to 21 days (mean, 19.2), 94.3% of the catheters were removed safely without adverse clinical consequences. The presence of a minimal contained contrast extravasation did not affect outcome after the removal of the catheter. The overall incidence of clinically significant extravasation was found to be 5.7% and was further reduced to 2.4% if extravasation was not suggested clinically in the postoperative course. Based on the current literature, significant extravasation is a common finding during the first 5 to 8 postoperative days. Therefore, management strategies advocating early urethral catheter removal should include routine cystographic studies. Otherwise, cystographic confirmation of anastomotic integrity before the removal of the catheter following 14 to 21 days of catheterization is not indicated in the routine postradical prostatectomy patient.

An evaluation of retropubic vesical capsular prostatectomy with routine Y-V closure in 103 patients.

1. Retropubic combined vesical capsule prostatectomy with routine Y–V closure is a safe and simple surgical procedure applicable to all age groups and any type of lesion obstructing the vesical neck. Its advantages are as follows:– Minimal morbidity. Low mortality–2 per cent. Short post–operative hospitalisation–eight days. Absence of late vesical neck stenosis post–operatively. Excellent control of bleeding during surgery. Quick and permanent conversion of patient to normal pain–free micturition with sterile urine. Requires no special instruments. Allows early ambulation. Permits relatively early removal of urethral catheter–three to five days. Can be done in obese patients. 2. Post–operative voiding cystograms and panendoscopy one year following surgery have revealed no late contracture of the vesical neck and minimal regrowth of the residual prostatic tissue. We feel that this is an interim report and final conclusions will be obtained in a five–year period on a larger series of patients. 3. This operation, although not recommended for cases where open cystostomy has been performed, offers the urologist an added weapon to deal effectively with a common problem.