Early Physician Follow-up Research Articles

Recent functional decline and outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge: a cohort study

BackgroundFunctional decline is common following acute hospitalization and is associated with hospital readmission, institutionalization, and mortality. People with functional decline may have difficulty accessing post-discharge medical care, even though early physician follow-up has the potential to prevent poor outcomes and is integral to high-quality transitional care. We sought to determine whether recent functional decline was associated with lower rates of post-discharge physician follow-up, and whether this association changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, given that both functional decline and COVID-19 may affect access to post-discharge care.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. We included patients over 65 who were discharged from an acute care facility during March 1st, 2019 – January 31st, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period), and March 1st, 2020 – January 31st, 2021 (COVID-19 period), and who were assessed for home care while in hospital. Patients with and without functional decline were compared. Our primary outcome was any physician follow-up visit within 7 days of discharge. We used propensity score weighting to compare outcomes between those with and without functional decline.ResultsOur study included 21,771 (pre-COVID) and 17,248 (COVID) hospitalized patients, of whom 15,637 (71.8%) and 12,965 (75.2%) had recent functional decline. Pre-COVID, there was no difference in physician follow-up within 7 days of discharge (Functional decline 45.0% vs. No functional decline 44.0%; RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98–1.06). These results did not change in the COVID-19 period (Functional decline 51.1% vs. No functional decline 49.4%; RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.99–1.08, Z-test for interaction p = 0.72). In the COVID-19 cohort, functional decline was associated with having a 7-day physician virtual visit (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08–1.24) and a 7-day physician home visit (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.10–2.43).ConclusionsFunctional decline was not associated with reduced 7-day post-discharge physician follow-up in either the pre-COVID-19 or COVID-19 periods. In the COVID-19 period, functional decline was positively associated with 7-day virtual and home-visit follow-up.

1174: A SEPSIS TRANSITION PROGRAM IMPROVES CARE DELIVERY TO SEPSIS SURVIVORS DISCHARGED TO POST-ACUTE CARE

Introduction: Sepsis survivors discharged to post-acute care facilities are at high risk for mortality and hospital readmission. In this study we compared receipt of transition care practices between patients enrolled in a Sepsis Transition and Recovery (STAR) program and patients receiving usual care. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of patients from the IMPACTS randomized trial who were discharged to a post-acute care facility. IMPACTS evaluated the effectiveness of STAR, a post-sepsis transition and recovery program using nurse navigators to deliver best practice post-sepsis care during and after hospitalization. The primary outcome for this secondary analysis was a set of transitional care elements including physical therapy, mental health assessment, speech therapy, follow-up visit within 10 days; documented medication reconciliation, and documentation of end-of-life care preferences. Analyses were conducted under an intention-to-treat approach. Outcome data were described using proportions and compared with chi-squared tests. Results: Of 691 patients enrolled in the IMPACTS trial, 175 (25%) were discharged to post-acute care facilities; 82% of this post-acute care cohort was discharged to skilled nursing, 11% to inpatient rehabilitation and 7% to long-term acute care. Medication reconciliation was documented in under half of patients overall but was nearly twice as frequent in the STAR group compared to the usual care group (62.5% vs 34.5%, p <.01). Few patients received depression screening after discharge although this was much higher among patients in the STAR group compared to usual care (34.1% vs 3.5%, p<.01). Completion of advance directives was also higher in the STAR group (50.0% vs 31.0%, p<.01) compared to the usual care group. Frequency of other care practices such as physical and occupational therapy and early physician followup were similar between STAR and usual care groups. Conclusions: Multiple barriers challenge delivery of transitional care for patients discharged to post-acute care facilities. Our secondary analysis of a clinical trial evaluating a sepsis-specific transition program found that structured transitional care increases the delivery of important care practices for sepsis survivors discharged to post-acute care facilities.

Association of Early Physician Follow-up With Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Congestive Heart Failure, or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A better understanding of the association between early physician follow-up after discharge and adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients may inform interventions aimed at reducing readmission for common chronic conditions. To assess whether hospitalized patients with early physician follow-up after discharge had lower rates of overall and condition-specific readmissions within 30 days and 90 days of discharge. This cohort study was conducted among Ontario, Canada, adults with first admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during 2005 to 2019. The exposure was follow-up visit with a primary care physician or relevant specialist within 7 days of discharge. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare patients with vs without early follow-up, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities, weighting by propensity score-based overlap weights. Data were analyzed from January through July 2021. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmissions, cardiac readmissions (readmission for AMI, CHF, or angina) for patients with cardiac conditions, and COPD-related readmissions for patients with COPD. Mortality at 30 days and 90 days was a secondary outcome. All percentages reported in Results are unweighted. The study cohort comprised 450 746 patients, including 198 854 patients with AMI, 133 058 patients with CHF, and 118 834 patients with COPD; the median (IQR) age was 66 (56-77) years for AMI, 78 (68-85) years for CHF, and 73 (64-81) years for COPD, and there were 64 339 (32.35%) women, 62 575 (47.03%) women, and 59 179 (49.80%) women, respectively. There were 91 182 patients (45.85%), 56 491 patients (42.46%), and 40 159 patients (33.79%), respectively, who received an early follow-up visit. Overall, patients with early follow-up had higher rates of collaborative care (eg, CHF: 20 931 patients [37.85%] vs 11 101 of 76 567 patients [14.85%]) and visits to a specialist within 30 days (eg, CHF: 25 797 patients [45.67%] vs 20 548 patients [26.84%]). Those with early follow-up had lower 90-day readmission rates among patients with CHF (15 934 patients [28.21%] vs 23 121 patients [30.20%]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and among those with COPD (8784 patients [21.87%] vs 18 097 of 78 675 patients [23.00%]; aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98). Among patients with COPD, those with early follow-up had lower 90-day COPD-related readmission rates (4015 patients [10.00%] vs 8449 patients [10.74%]; aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96), and among patients with CHF, those with early follow-up had lower 90-day mortality rates (4044 patients [7.16%] vs 6281 patients [8.20%]; aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). There were no significant benefits at 30 days or for patients with AMI. These findings suggest that early follow-up in conjunction with a comprehensive transitional care strategy for hospitalized patients with medically complex conditions coupled with ongoing effective chronic disease management may be associated with reduced 90-day readmissions.

Abstract 15017: Early Post-discharge Follow-up Delay After Hospitalization for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Reduces Readmission for Heart Failure in the Following Year

Introduction: Early physician follow-up after hospital discharge for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is recommended by the AHA to prevent early hospital readmission. This recommendation has not been specifically evaluated for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Hypothesis: Earlier follow-up should lead to decrease in readmissions for ADHF in the HFpEF population even when adjusting for confounding factors. Methods: Consecutive ADHF hospitalisation that occurred inclusively between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Main inclusion criterion was left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%. The major exclusion criteria were: severe valvulopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, acute coronary syndrome 3 months before hospitalisation, chronic kidney failure (eGFR &lt;30 ml/min), severe chronic respiratory disease and death before discharge. Follow-up delay after discharge was dichotomized (early vs late/no follow up) by using the median delay. Main outcome was hospital readmission in the year following discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for main outcome according to follow-up delay and adjusted for age, sex, medication at discharge and major comorbid conditions. Results: A total of 163 heart failure readmission (37% of patients) occurred in 438 patients in the year following the first hospitalisation. Median readmission delay was of 62 days. Median dedicated follow-up delay was 30 days and was arranged in 68% of cases. After adjusting for confounding variables, early follow-up was significantly associated with fewer readmission (adjusted odds ratio 0.57, 95% CI; 0.34-0.97). Conclusions: Early dedicated follow-up after discharge for HFpEF was associated with fewer readmission over the year following discharge even when adjusting for major confounding variables.

Effect of early physician follow-up on mortality and subsequent hospital admissions after emergency care for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.

The 1-year mortality rate in patients with heart failure who are discharged from an emergency department is 20%. We sought to determine whether early follow-up after discharge from the emergency department was associated with decreased mortality or subsequent admission to hospital. This retrospective cohort study conducted in Ontario, Canada, included adult patients who were discharged from 1 of 163 emergency departments between April 2007 and March 2014 with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. Using a propensity score-matched landmark analysis, we assessed follow-up in relation to mortality and admissions to hospital for cardiovascular conditions. Of 34 519 patients, 16 274 (47.1%) obtained follow-up care within 7 days and 28 846 (83.6%) within 30 days. Compared with follow-up between day 8 and 30, patients with follow-up care within 7 days had a lower rate of mortality over 1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.97), and a reduced rate of admission to hospital over 90 days (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.94) and 1 year (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97); the mortality rate over 90 days in this group trended to a lower rate (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.10-1.00). Follow-up care within 30 days, compared with patients without 30-day follow-up, was associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97) but not admission to hospital (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10). In this group, there was a trend toward an increase in 90-day admission to hospital (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00-1.29). Follow-up care within 7 days of discharge from the emergency department was associated with lower rates of long-term mortality, as well as subsequent hospital admissions, and a trend to lower short-term mortality rates. Timely access to longitudinal care for patients with heart failure who are discharged from the emergency setting should be prioritized.

Separating variability in healthcare practice patterns from random error.

Improving the quality of care that patients receive is a major focus of clinical research, particularly in the setting of cardiovascular hospitalization. Quality improvement studies seek to estimate and visualize the degree of variability in dichotomous treatment patterns and outcomes across different providers, whereby naive techniques either over-estimate or under-estimate the actual degree of variation. Various statistical methods have been proposed for similar applications including (1) the Gaussian hierarchical model, (2) the semi-parametric Bayesian hierarchical model with a Dirichlet process prior and (3) the non-parametric empirical Bayes approach of smoothing by roughening. Alternatively, we propose that a recently developed method for density estimation in the presence of measurement error, moment-adjusted imputation, can be adapted for this problem. The methods are compared by an extensive simulation study. In the present context, we find that the Bayesian methods are sensitive to the choice of prior and tuning parameters, whereas moment-adjusted imputation performs well with modest sample size requirements. The alternative approaches are applied to identify disparities in the receipt of early physician follow-up after myocardial infarction across 225 hospitals in the CRUSADE registry.

Relationship between Early Physician Follow-Up and 30-Day Readmission after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.

BackgroundThirty-day readmission rates after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure are important patient outcome metrics. Early post-discharge physician follow-up has been promoted as a method of reducing 30-day readmission rates. However, the relationships between early post-discharge follow-up and 30-day readmission for AMI and heart failure are inconclusive. We used nationwide population-based data to examine associations between 7-day physician follow-up and 30-day readmission, and further associations of 7-day same physician (during the index hospitalization and at follow-up) and cardiologist follow-up with 30-day readmission for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or heart failure.MethodsWe analyzed all patients 18 years or older with NSTEMI and heart failure and discharged from hospitals in 2010 in Taiwan through Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional hazard models with robust sandwich variance estimates and propensity score weighting were performed after adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics to test associations between 7-day physician follow-up and 30-day readmission.ResultsThe study population for NSTEMI and heart failure included 5,008 and 13,577 patients, respectively. Early physician follow-up was associated with a lower hazard ratio of readmission compared with no early physician follow-up for patients with NSTEMI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.57), and for patients with heart failure (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.48–0.60). Same physician follow-up was associated with a reduced hazard ratio of readmission compared with different physician follow-up for patients with NSTEMI (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48–0.65), and for patients with heart failure (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62–0.76).ConclusionsFor each condition, patients who have an outpatient visit with a physician within 7 days of discharge have a lower risk of 30-day readmission. Moreover, patients who have an outpatient visit with the same physician within 7 days of discharge have a much lower risk of 30-day readmission.

Early Physician Follow-Up and Out-of-Hospital Outcomes After Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment in Elderly Patients

The impact of early physician follow-up on out-of-hospital outcomes after cerebral aneurysm treatment has not been studied previously. We investigated the association of early physician follow-up (within 30 days of discharge) with mortality and readmissions for elderly patients undergoing treatment for cerebral aneurysms. We performed a cohort study of 100% of Medicare fee-for-service claims data for elderly patients who underwent treatment for cerebral aneurysms from 2007 to 2012. To control for confounding, we used propensity score conditioning and inverse probability weighting, with mixed effects to account for clustering at the Hospital Referral Region level. Of 8703 patients presenting with unruptured aneurysms, 5673 (65.2%) had early physician follow-up, and 3030 (34.8%) did not. Of 3211 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 1504 (46.8%) had early physician follow-up, and 1707 (53.2%) did not. Propensity score-adjusted analysis demonstrated that patients with unruptured aneurysms who visited a physician within 30 days of discharge had lower 3-month mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.36-0.74) but a greater rate of 90-day readmissions (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.28). Similarly, early follow-up was associated with lower 3-month mortality (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.46), and a greater rate of 90-day readmissions (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.02-3.14) for patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage. In a cohort of Medicare patients undergoing treatment for cerebral aneurysms, we identified an association of early physician follow-up with decreased short-term post-discharge mortality, but increased 90-day readmissions. More studies on the impact of strengthening the post-discharge network on the outcomes of this population are warranted.

Reducing Readmissions among Heart Failure Patients Discharged to Home Health Care: Effectiveness of Early and Intensive Nursing Services and Early Physician Follow-Up.

To compare the effectiveness of two "treatments"-early, intensive home health nursing and physician follow-up within a week-versus less intense and later postacute care in reducing readmissions among heart failure (HF) patients discharged to home health care. National Medicare administrative, claims, and patient assessment data. Patients with a full week of potential exposure to the treatments were followed for 30days to determine exposure status, 30-day all-cause hospital readmission, other health care use, and mortality. An extension of instrumental variables methods for nonlinear statistical models corrects for nonrandom selection of patients into treatment categories. Our instruments are the index hospital's rate of early aftercare for non-HF patients and hospital discharge day of the week. All hospitalizations for a HF principal diagnosis with discharge to home health care between July 2009 and June 2010 were identified from source files. Neither treatment by itself has a statistically significant effect on hospital readmission. In combination, however, they reduce the probability of readmission by roughly 8 percentage points (p<.001; confidence interval=-12.3, -4.1). Results are robust to changes in implementation of the nonlinear IV estimator, sample, outcome measure, and length of follow-up. Our results call for closer coordination between home health and medical providers in the clinical management of HF patients immediately after hospital discharge.

Circulation : Clinical Summaries

<i>Circulation</i> : Clinical Summaries

Impact of physician continuity on death or urgent readmission after discharge among patients with heart failure

Early physician follow-up after discharge is associated with lower rates of death and readmission among patients with heart failure. We explored whether physician continuity further influences outcomes after discharge. We used data from linked administrative databases for all adults aged 20 years or more in the province of Alberta who were discharged alive from hospital between January 1999 and June 2009 with a first-time diagnosis of heart failure. We used Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent covariates to analyze the effect of follow-up with a familiar physician within the first month after discharge on the primary outcome of death or urgent all-cause readmission over 6 months. A familiar physician was defined as one who had seen the patient at least twice in the year before the index admission or once during the index admission. In the first month after discharge, 5336 (21.9%) of the 24 373 identified patients had no follow-up visits, 16 855 (69.2%) saw a familiar physician, and 2182 (9.0%) saw unfamiliar physician(s) exclusively. The risk of death or unplanned readmission during the 6-month observation period was lower among patients who saw a familiar physician (43.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.91) or an unfamiliar physician (43.6%; adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97) for early follow-up visits, as compared with patients who had no follow-up visits (62.9%). Taking into account all follow-up visits over the 6-month period, we found that the risk of death or urgent readmission was lower among patients who had all of their visits with a familiar physician than among those followed by unfamiliar physicians (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98). Early physician follow-up after discharge and physician continuity were both associated with better outcomes among patients with heart failure. Research is needed to explore whether physician continuity is important for other conditions and in settings other than recent hospital discharge.

Association of Early Physician Follow-Up and 30-Day Readmission After Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among Older Patients

Hospital readmission rates within 30 days after acute myocardial infarction are a national performance metric. Previous data suggest that early physician follow-up after heart failure hospitalizations can reduce readmissions; whether these results can be extended to acute myocardial infarction is unclear. We analyzed data from the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) Registry linked with Medicare claims from 2003 to 2006 for 25 872 non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients ≥65 years of age discharged home from 228 hospitals with >25 patients and full revascularization capabilities. After adjusting for patient, treatment, and hospital characteristics, we examined the relationship between hospital-level physician follow-up within 7 days of discharge and 30-day all-cause readmission using logistic regression. The median hospital-level percentage of patients receiving early physician follow-up was 23.3% (interquartile range, 17.1%-29.1%). Among 24 165 patients with Medicare fee-for-service eligibility 30 days after discharge, 18.5% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of index hospitalization. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of 30-day readmission did not differ among quartiles of hospital-level early physician follow-up. Similarly, each 5% increase in hospital early follow-up was associated with an insignificant change in risk for readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.02; P=0.60). Sensitivity analyses extended these null findings to 30-day cardiovascular readmissions, high-risk subgroups, and early cardiology follow-up. Although rates of early physician follow-up after acute myocardial infarction varied among US hospitals, hospitals with higher early follow-up rates did not have lower 30-day readmission rates. Targeting strategies other than early physician follow-up may be necessary to reduce readmissions in this population.

Associations of Patient Demographic Characteristics and Regional Physician Density With Early Physician Follow-Up Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Heart Failure

Early physician follow-up after a heart failure (HF) hospitalization is associated with lower risk of readmission. However, factors associated with early physician follow-up are not well understood. We identified 30,136 patients with HF ≥65 years at 225 hospitals participating in the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE) registry or the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) registry from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2006. We linked these clinical data to Medicare claims data for longitudinal follow-up. Using logistic regression models with site-level random effects, we identified predictors of physician follow-up within 7 days of hospital discharge. Overall 11,420 patients (37.9%) had early physician follow-up. Patients residing in hospital referral regions with higher physician concentration were significantly more likely to have early follow-up (odds ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.48, for highest vs lowest quartile). Patients in rural areas (0.84, 0.78 to 0.91) and patients with lower socioeconomic status (0.79, 0.74 to 0.85) were less likely to have early follow-up. Women (0.87, 0.83 to 0.91) and black patients (0.84, 0.77 to 0.92) were less likely to receive early follow-up. Patients with greater co-morbidity were less likely to receive early follow-up. In conclusion, physician follow-up within 7 days after discharge from a HF hospitalization varied according to regional physician density, rural location, socioeconomic status, gender, race, and co-morbid conditions. Strategies are needed to ensure access among vulnerable populations to this supply-sensitive resource.

EARLY PHYSICIAN FOLLOW‐UP AFTER HOSPITALIZATION FOR HEART FAILURE IS ALSO RELEVANT

To the Editor: Given that cardiovascular disorders (including congestive heart failure) account for the majority of potentially avoidable hospitalizations of nursing home residents1 and that “the days immediately following discharge are a vulnerable period” for patients with heart failure,2 it was an omission on the part of Ouslander and colleagues1 not to evaluate the relationship between early physician follow-up and readmission rates for nursing home residents with heart failure. Early physician follow-up generates an opportunity to evaluate the patient's clinical status outside of the highly structured hospital setting and to review therapeutic strategies accordingly.2 This might well be the reason why, in that study, there was a significant (P<.01) inverse relationship between early follow-up and the hazard of 30-day readmission.2 To compound the deleterious effects of suboptimal follow-up, in many hospitals, “the discharge instructions are becoming rote processes that do not adequately address elements of care that ensure a safe transition [to primary care],”2 and it is my belief is that this is especially true when the highly demanding duty to compose a meaningful discharge summary is relegated, without proper supervision or monitoring, to junior staff, some of whom regard it as a mindless chore, devoid of any contribution toward continuing professional development.3 One of the defining characteristics of discharge summaries that have degenerated into rote processes or mindless chores is the failure to highlight adverse drug reactions, leading, in one example, to postdischarge rechallenge with thiazide diuretics in the instance of a patient previously admitted with severe thiazide-related hyponatremia.4 My own belief is that the use of an integrated health record (a so-called core medical record) in secondary and tertiary care, characterized by a problem-oriented integration of contributions from the entire healthcare team,5, 6 as opposed to the system of separate medical and nursing notes prevailing in some if not most hospitals in the United Kingdom, will enhance the timing of discharge and the potential to generate discharge summaries of greatest value to primary care. Furthermore, to “weed out” inaccuracies identified by one audit,7 discharge summaries should be audited on a regular basis,6 and this should be part of good clinical governance. Finally, to ease the transition from hospital to the less highly structured environment of the nursing home, the hospital discharge program should be reengineered to engage the services of a nurse discharge advocate to coordinate the discharge plan with the hospital team and to transmit a problem-orientated discharge summary to physicians and services accepting responsibility for the patient's care and the services of a clinical pharmacist to call on patients within the first week of discharge to reinforce the discharge plan and review all medications.8 Participants in one such program also have significantly (P=.009) lower rehospitalizations than participants receiving “usual” care.8 Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the author and has determined that the author has no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper. Author Contributions: The author is the sole contributor to this paper. Sponsor's Role: None.

Early Physician Follow-up and 30-Day Readmission Among Older Patients With Heart Failure

Early Physician Follow-up and 30-Day Readmission Among Older Patients With Heart Failure

Early Physician Follow-up and 30-Day Readmission Among Older Patients With Heart Failure—Reply

Early Physician Follow-up and 30-Day Readmission Among Older Patients With Heart Failure—Reply

Relationship Between Early Physician Follow-up and 30-Day Readmission Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure

Readmission after hospitalization for heart failure is common. Early outpatient follow-up after hospitalization has been proposed as a means of reducing readmission rates. However, there are limited data describing patterns of follow-up after heart failure hospitalization and its association with readmission rates. To examine associations between outpatient follow-up within 7 days after discharge from a heart failure hospitalization and readmission within 30 days. Observational analysis of patients 65 years or older with heart failure and discharged to home from hospitals participating in the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure and the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure quality improvement program from January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2006. All-cause readmission within 30 days after discharge. The study population included 30,136 patients from 225 hospitals. Median length of stay was 4 days (interquartile range, 2-6) and 21.3% of patients were readmitted within 30 days. At the hospital level, the median percentage of patients who had early follow-up after discharge from the index hospitalization was 38.3% (interquartile range, 32.4%-44.5%). Compared with patients whose index admission was in a hospital in the lowest quartile of early follow-up (30-day readmission rate, 23.3%), the rates of 30-day readmission were 20.5% among patients in the second quartile (risk-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.93), 20.5% among patients in the third quartile (risk-adjusted HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96), and 20.9% among patients in the fourth quartile (risk-adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-1.00). Among patients who are hospitalized for heart failure, substantial variation exists in hospital-level rates of early outpatient follow-up after discharge. Patients who are discharged from hospitals that have higher early follow-up rates have a lower risk of 30-day readmission. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00344513.