Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity globally, necessitating effective intervention strategies. Early invasive procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are often recommended for high-risk patients. However, their cost-effectiveness in low-income regions remains uncertain, particularly in Pakistan, where healthcare resources are limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early invasive procedures compared to standard care for ACS in low-income regions of Pakistan. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study from January 1, 2021, to January 31, 2021, at four major hospitals in Pakistan: Army Cardiac Center Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Lahore, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar, and Mardan Medical Complex. The participants included 436 patients diagnosed with ACS aged 18 years or older and presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset. The patients were divided into two groups: the early invasive procedure group (n = 218) and the standard care group (n = 218). The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes included recurrent myocardial infarctions, hospital readmissions, healthcare costs, and procedural complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY), employing descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, independent t-tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results The early invasive procedure group showed a mortality rate of 18 (8%) compared to 33 (15%) in the standard care group, demonstrating a significant reduction in mortality (p = 0.01). Additionally, the average healthcare cost was significantly lower in the early invasive group, with mean costs of Pakistani rupee (PKR) 187,200 (US dollar {USD} 1,200) compared to PKR 280,800 (USD 1,800) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Recurrent myocardial infarctions occurred in 11 (5%) of the early invasive group versus 26 (12%) in the standard care group (p < 0.05). Hospital readmission rates were lower in the early invasive group, 22 (10%) compared to 39 (18%) in the standard care group (p < 0.05). Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the early invasive group, with mean costs of PKR 187,200 (USD 1,200) compared to PKR 280,800 (USD 1,800) in the standard care group (p < 0.01). Conclusion Early invasive procedures for ACS significantly improve survival rates, reduce complications, and lower healthcare costs in low-income regions of Pakistan. These findings suggest that such strategies should be considered in resource-limited settings to optimize patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization.
Read full abstract