Early Glucose-lowering Effect Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Three Different Formulations of Insulin Aspart: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study in Men With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVETo investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and safety of a novel formulation of insulin aspart (AT247) versus two currently marketed insulin aspart formulations (NovoRapid [IAsp] and Fiasp [faster IAsp]).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThis single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-period, crossover study was conducted in 19 men with type 1 diabetes, receiving single dosing of trial products (0.3 units/kg) in a random order on three visits. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed during a euglycemic clamp lasting up to 8 h.RESULTSOnset of insulin appearance was earlier for AT247 compared with IAsp (−12 min [95% CI −14; −8], P = 0.0004) and faster IAsp (−2 min [−5; −2], P = 0.0003). Onset of action was accelerated compared with IAsp (−23 min [−37; −15], P = 0.0004) and faster IAsp (−9 min [−11; −3], P = 0.0006). Within the first 60 min, a higher exposure was observed for AT247 compared with IAsp by the area under the curve (AUC) glucose infusion rate (GIR) from 0 to 60 min (AUCAsp0–60min: treatment ratio vs. IAsp 2.3 [1.9; 2.9] vs. faster IAsp 1.5 [1.3; 1.8]), which was underpinned by a greater early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0–60min: treatment ratio vs. IAsp 2.8 [2.0; 5.5] vs. faster IAsp 1.7 [1.3; 2.3]). Furthermore, an earlier offset of exposure was observed for AT247 compared with IAsp (−32 min [−58; −15], P = 0.0015) and faster IAsp (−27 min [−85; −15], P = 0.0017), while duration of the glucose-lowering effect, measured by time to late half-maximum effect, did not differ significantly.CONCLUSIONSAT247 exhibited an earlier insulin appearance, exposure, and offset, with corresponding enhanced early glucose-lowering effect compared with IAsp and faster IAsp. It therefore represents a promising candidate in the pursuit for second-generation prandial insulin analogs to improve postprandial glycemic control.

231-OR: Phase I Study Investigating the PD, PK, and Safety of AT247 in Comparison with Novorapid and Fiasp

Background: AT247, an ultra-rapid acting formulation of insulin aspart designed for faster absorption following s.c. injection, will lead to better postprandial glycaemic control and is key to the development of closed-loop pump systems. Method: Plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations were measured in 19 adult male participants with T1DM following a single s.c. dose (0.3 U/Kg) of insulin in a randomised, double-blind, cross over euglycaemic clamp study. Results: Data presented as median; range. AT247 had a faster onset of glucose lowering effect than NovoRapid® and Fiasp® (onset of action: 17; 12-30 vs. 37; 20-88 vs. 23;16-50 mins). The early glucose lowering effect was greater for AT247 than NovoRapid® and Fiasp® (AUCGIR 0-60min: 212; 63-465 vs. 49; 0-303 vs. 91; 11-300 mg/kg; GIR=glucose infusion rate) (Fig 1A). Similarly, greater initial insulin exposure was seen for AT247 compared to NovoRapid® and Fiasp® (AUC Insulin 0-60min: 111; 48-205 vs. 41; 12-147 vs. 66; 25-188 mU*h/L). In addition, offset of exposure occurred earlier for AT247 than NovoRapid® and Fiasp® (time to late 50% Cmax Insulin: 173; 89-414 vs. 212; 106-389 vs. 221;106-441 mins). (Fig 1B). Comparisons are statistically significant with p<0.05. No safety signals were detected for AT247. Conclusion: AT247 has a superior (left-shifted) time-action and time-concentration profile as compared to both NovoRapid® and Fiasp®. Disclosure T.R. Pieber: Advisory Panel; Self; ADOCIA, Arecor, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Diagnostics K.K. T. Augustin: None. C. Magnes: None. D.J. Gerring: None. J. Jezek: None. S.J. Howell: None. L. Zakrzewski: None. F.J. Lawrence: None. E. Svehlikova: None.

Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart and the Need for New Mealtime Insulin Analogues in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Canadian Perspective.

Limiting postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions is an important aspect of overall glycemic control. Rapid-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs) aim to mimic the physiologic action of endogenous insulin observed in individuals without diabetes and prevent excessive PPG excursions. However, many people with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes treated with RAIAs do not achieve glycated hemoglobin (A1C) targets, and there is an unmet need for further improvements in PPG control. Current RAIAs have a delayed onset and a longer duration of action compared with endogenous insulin secreted in response to meals. Approachesto developing new mealtime insulins with accelerated absorption kinetics include changing the route of administration (i.e. via inhalation) and changing the insulin formulation. Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is a novel formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) containing the excipients niacinamide and L-arginine. Faster aspart has an earlier onset of insulin exposure and a greater early glucose-lowering effect than IAsp. In large clinical trials, mealtime faster aspart demonstrated noninferiority to IAsp with respect to A1C reduction and provided superior PPG control with no increase in overall severe or blood glucose-confirmed hyperglycemia. In addition, faster aspart administered up to 20min after the start of a meal was noninferior to mealtime IAsp in terms of A1C control, highlighting the opportunity for postmeal dosing. Faster aspart is the first of a new generation of mealtime insulins to be approved in Canada for the treatment of adults with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, and it is included in the 2018 Diabetes Canada clinical practice guidelines.

Clinical Pharmacology of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart Measured as Free or Total Insulin Aspart and the Relation to Anti-Insulin Aspart Antibody Levels in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

BackgroundFast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is an ultra-fast-acting formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp). This post hoc analysis investigated the pharmacokinetics of faster aspart versus IAsp, measured as free or total IAsp, and the relationship between anti-IAsp antibodies and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of faster aspart and IAsp.MethodsFree and total IAsp concentrations and anti-IAsp antibodies were determined in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving subcutaneous faster aspart and/or IAsp in four single-dose clinical pharmacology trials (n = 175) and a 26-week phase IIIa trial (n = 1040). Pharmacodynamics were assessed by euglycaemic clamp or meal test, respectively.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic profile was left-shifted and early exposure was greater with faster aspart versus IAsp independent of free or total IAsp assay. The faster aspart-IAsp difference in the time to 50% of maximum IAsp concentration in the early part of the pharmacokinetic profile (tEarly 50 % Cmax) [95% confidence interval (CI)] was − 8.8 [− 10.0 to − 7.5] and − 7.6 [− 8.8 to − 6.4] min for free and total IAsp, respectively. The faster aspart/IAsp ratio for the area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) for IAsp from time zero to 30 min (AUCIAsp,0–30 min) [95% CI] was 1.88 [1.74–2.04] and 1.77 [1.64–1.90] for free and total IAsp. Higher anti-IAsp antibody levels were associated with a lower ratio of free/total IAsp for the total AUC for IAsp (AUCIAsp,0–t). Early glucose-lowering effect (AUC for the glucose infusion rate [GIR] from time zero to 60 min [AUCGIR,0–60 min]) was greater by 25–44% for faster aspart versus IAsp independent of anti-IAsp antibody levels. Total glucose-lowering effect (total AUC for GIR [AUCGIR,0–t]) in a clamp and 1-h postprandial glucose increment in a meal test appeared essentially unaffected by anti-IAsp antibodies.ConclusionsFaster aspart provides accelerated pharmacokinetics versus IAsp regardless if based on free or total IAsp assay. Higher anti-IAsp antibodies increase total IAsp concentrations but do not influence faster aspart nor IAsp pharmacodynamics.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiersNCT01618188, NCT02003677, NCT01934712, NCT02568280, NCT01831765.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0718-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

BackgroundFast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation aiming to mimic the fast endogenous prandial insulin release more closely than currently available insulin products. In a post hoc analysis of pooled data from six clinical pharmacology trials, the pharmacological characteristics of faster aspart and IAsp were compared.MethodsThe analysis included 218 adult subjects with type 1 diabetes from six randomised, double-blind, crossover trials in the faster aspart clinical development programme. Subjects received subcutaneous dosing (0.2 U/kg) of faster aspart and IAsp. In three trials, a 12-h euglycaemic clamp was performed (target 5.5 mmol/L; 100 mg/dL) to assess pharmacodynamics.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were left-shifted for faster aspart versus IAsp. Onset of appearance occurred 4.9 min earlier (95% confidence interval [CI] faster aspart-IAsp: [−5.3 to −4.4], p < 0.001), early exposure (AUCIAsp,0–30min) was two times greater (estimated ratio faster aspart/IAsp 2.01 [1.87–2.17], p < 0.001) and offset of exposure (t Late 50% Cmax) occurred 12.2 min earlier [−17.9 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Accordingly, onset of action occurred 4.9 min earlier [−6.9 to −3.0] (p < 0.001), early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0–30min) was 74% greater (1.74 [1.47–2.10], p < 0.001) and offset of glucose-lowering effect (t Late 50% GIRmax) occurred 14.3 min earlier [−22.1 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Total exposure and total glucose-lowering effect did not differ significantly between treatments.ConclusionsFaster aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiologic prandial insulin secretion and thereby to improve postprandial glucose control compared with IAsp. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02035371, NCT01924637, NCT02131246, NCT02033239, NCT02003677, NCT01618188.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Aspart Across a Clinically Relevant Dose Range in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

BackgroundAbsorption of current rapid-acting insulins is too slow for patients with diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal postprandial glucose control. Faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart in a new formulation with faster early absorption. We compared the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of faster aspart and insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range.MethodsIn this randomised, double-blind, crossover trial, 46 subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus received single subcutaneous doses of faster aspart and insulin aspart at 0.1, 0.2 (repeated three times to estimate within-subject variability) and 0.4 U/kg in a euglycaemic clamp setting (target 5.5 mmol/L).ResultsConsistently for the three doses, faster aspart demonstrated faster onset and greater early absorption and glucose-lowering effect versus insulin aspart. Across all three doses, onset of appearance occurred approximately twice as fast (approximately 5 min earlier) and early insulin exposure (AUCIAsp,0–30min) was approximately 1.5- to 2-fold greater for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Likewise, onset of action occurred approximately 5 min faster and early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0–30min) was approximately 1.5- to 2-fold larger for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Relative bioavailability was approximately 100% and total glucose-lowering effect was similar for faster aspart versus insulin aspart. Dose–concentration and dose–response relationships were comparable between faster aspart and insulin aspart. Within-subject variability in glucose-lowering effect was low for faster aspart (coefficient of variation approximately 20%) and not significantly different from insulin aspart.ConclusionThe faster onset and greater early insulin exposure and glucose-lowering effect with faster aspart versus insulin aspart are preserved across a broad range of doses and consistently observed from day to day.ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT02033239.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0473-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Comparison of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties Between Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart and Insulin Aspart in Elderly Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

BackgroundDue to population aging, an increasing number of elderly patients with diabetes use insulin. It is therefore important to investigate the characteristics of new insulins in this population. Faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation with faster absorption. This study investigated the pharmacological properties of faster aspart in elderly subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).MethodsIn a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover trial, 30 elderly (≥65 years) and 37 younger adults (18–35 years) with T1DM received single subcutaneous faster aspart or IAsp dosing (0.2 U/kg) and underwent an euglycaemic clamp (target 5.5 mmol/L) for up to 12 h.ResultsThe pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic time profiles were left-shifted for faster aspart versus IAsp. In each age group, onset of appearance occurred approximately twice as fast (~3 min earlier) and early exposure (area under the concentration–time curve [AUC] for serum IAsp from time zero to 30 min [AUCIAsp,0-30 min]) was greater (by 86% in elderly and 67% in younger adults) for faster aspart than for IAsp. Likewise, onset of action occurred 10 min faster in the elderly and 9 min faster in younger adults, and early glucose-lowering effect (AUC for the glucose infusion rate [GIR] from time zero to 30 min [AUCGIR,0-30 min]) was greater (by 109%) for faster aspart than for IAsp in both age groups. Total exposure (AUCIAsp,0-t) and the maximum concentration (C max) for faster aspart were greater (by 30 and 28%, respectively) in elderly than in younger adults. No age group differences were seen for the total (AUCGIR,0-t) or maximum (GIRmax) glucose-lowering effect.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the ultra-fast pharmacological properties of faster aspart are similar in elderly subjects and younger adults with T1DM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02003677.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0418-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Faster Onset and Greater Early Exposure and Glucose-Lowering Effect with Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Aspart: A Pooled Analysis in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes

Faster Onset and Greater Early Exposure and Glucose-Lowering Effect with Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Aspart: A Pooled Analysis in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes

Lispro administered by the QS-M Needle-Free Jet Injector generates an earlier insulin exposure

ABSTRACTObjective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) profiles of lispro administered by the QS-M needle-free jet injector in Chinese subjects.Research design and methods: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study was performed. Eighteen healthy volunteers were recruited. Lispro (0.2 units/kg) was administered by the QS-M needle-free jet injector or by conventional pen. Seven-hour euglycemic clamp tests were performed.Results: A larger area under the curve (AUCs) of insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate (GIR) during the first 20 minutes after lispro injection by the jet injector compared to the insulin pen was observed (24.91 ± 15.25 vs. 12.52 ± 7.60 mg. kg−1, P < 0.001 for AUCGIR,0–20 min; 0.36 ± 0.24 vs. 0.10 ± 0.04 U min L−1, P < 0.001 for AUCINS, 0–20 min). Needle-free injection showed a shorter time to reach maximum insulin concentration (37.78 ± 11.14 vs. 80.56 ± 37.18 min, P < 0.001) and GIR (73.24 ± 29.89 vs. 116.18 ± 51.89 min, P = 0.006). There were no differences in total insulin exposure and hypoglycemic effects between the two devices.Conclusion: Lispro administered by QS-M needle-free injector results in earlier and higher insulin exposure than conventional pen, and a greater early glucose-lowering effect with similar overall potency.

Hepatic role in an early glucose-lowering effect by a novel dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, evogliptin, in a rodent model of type 2 diabetes

Although multiple dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors have shown glucose-lowering effects by preserving pancreatic cells in high-fat diet (HFD)/streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice, the hepatic role in regulation of glucose homeostasis by DPP4 inhibitors in HFD/STZ mice remains elusive. In herein study, parallel comparison of effects on the liver (expression of gluconeogenic genes and the linked signaling molecules) and pancreas (islet morphology and relative area of alpha or beta cells) in combination with glucose-lowering effects were made at the end of 2- and 10-week of evogliptin treatment in HFD/STZ mice. Significant control of hyperglycemia was observed from the second week and persisted during 10-week treatment of 0.3% evogliptin in HFD/STZ mice. This effect was accompanied by increased level of plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 and preserved pancreas islet structure. Furthermore, the hepatic increases in gluconeogenic gene expression in HFD/STZ mice was significantly reduced by evogliptin treatment, which was accompanied by the suppression of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation and expression of transducer of regulated CREB protein 2. This hepatic effect of evogliptin treatment was reproduced in 2-week study, however, pancreatic beta-cell area was not altered yet although the expression of pancreatic and duodenal homeobox protein 1 was increased. We conclude that the suppression of hepatic gluconeogenesis by evogliptin is followed by preservation of pancreatic islet, leading to remarkable and persistent glucose-lowering effect in HFD/STZ mice. Our findings provide further insight for the hepatic role in DPP4 inhibitor-mediated glucose control in diabetes.

Is Insulin Action in the Brain Relevant in Regulating Blood Glucose in Humans?

In addition to its direct action on the liver to lower hepatic glucose production, insulin action in the central nervous system (CNS) also lowers hepatic glucose production in rodents after 4 hours. Although CNS insulin action (CNSIA) modulates hepatic glycogen synthesis in dogs, it has no net effect on hepatic glucose output over a 4-hour period. The role of CNSIA in regulating plasma glucose has recently been examined in humans and is the focus of this review. Intransal insulin (INI) administration increases CNS insulin concentration. Hence, INI can address whether CNSIA regulates plasma glucose concentration in humans. We and three other groups have sought to answer this question, with differing conclusions. Here we will review the critical aspects of each study, including its design, which may explain these discordant conclusions. The early glucose-lowering effect of INI is likely due to spillover of insulin into the systemic circulation. In the presence of simultaneous portal and CNS hyperinsulinemia, portal insulin action is dominant. INI administration does lower plasma glucose independent of peripheral insulin concentration (between ∼3 and 6 h after administration), suggesting that CNSIA may play a role in glucose homeostasis in the late postprandial period when its action is likely greatest and portal insulin concentration is at baseline. The potential physiological role and purpose of this pathway are discussed in this review. Because the effects of INI are attenuated in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity, this is unlikely to be of therapeutic utility.

Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart.

AimsTo evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of faster‐acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart in a randomized, single‐centre, double‐blind study.MethodsFifty‐two patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age 40.3 years) received faster‐acting insulin aspart, insulin aspart, or another faster aspart formulation (not selected for further development), each as a single 0.2 U/kg subcutaneous dose, under glucose‐clamp conditions, in a three‐way crossover design (3–12 days washout between dosing).ResultsFaster‐acting insulin aspart had a faster onset of exposure compared with insulin aspart, shown by a 57% earlier onset of appearance [4.9 vs 11.2 min; ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36; 0.51], a 35% earlier time to reach 50% maximum concentration (20.7 vs 31.6 min; ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.59; 0.72) and a greater early exposure within 90 min after dosing. The greatest difference occurred during the first 15 min, when area under the serum insulin aspart curve was 4.5‐fold greater with faster‐acting insulin aspart than with insulin aspart. Both treatments had a similar time to maximum concentration, total exposure and maximum concentration. Faster‐acting insulin aspart had a significantly greater glucose‐lowering effect within 90 min after dosing [largest difference: area under the curve for the glucose infusion rate (AUCGIR), 0–30 min ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.13; 2.02] and 17% earlier time to reach 50% maximum glucose infusion rate (38.3 vs 46.1 min; ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.73; 0.94). The primary endpoint (AUCGIR , 0–2 h) was 10% greater for faster‐acting insulin aspart, but did not reach statistical significance (ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.00; 1.22). Both treatments had similar total and maximum glucose‐lowering effects, indicating similar overall potency.ConclusionsFaster‐acting insulin aspart was found to have earlier onset and higher early exposure than insulin aspart, and a greater early glucose‐lowering effect, with similar potency.

Profound defects in β-cell function in screen-detected type 2 diabetes are not improved with glucose-lowering treatment in the Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP).

Few studies have measured the ability of interventions to affect declining β-cell function in screen-detected type 2 diabetes. The Early Diabetes Intervention Programme (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01470937) was a randomized study based on the hypothesis that improving postprandial glucose excursions with acarbose would slow the progression of fasting hyperglycaemia in screen-detected type 2 diabetes. In the Early Diabetes Intervention Programme, the effect of acarbose plus lifestyle advice on progression of fasting hyperglycaemia over a 5-year period was not greater than that of placebo. However, there was an early glucose-lowering effect of the trial. The objective of the current secondary analysis was to describe β-cell function changes in response to glucose lowering. Participants were overweight adult subjects with screen-detected type 2 diabetes. β-cell function was measured using hyperglycaemic clamps and oral glucose tolerance testing. The primary outcome was the change in β-cell function from baseline to year 1, the time point where the maximal glucose-lowering effect was seen. At baseline, participants exhibited markedly impaired first-phase insulin response. Despite significant reductions in weight, fasting plasma glucose (PG) and 2-h PG, there was no clinically significant improvement in the first-phase insulin response. Late-phase insulin responses declined despite beneficial glycaemic effects of interventions. Insulin secretion is already severely impaired in early, screen-detected type 2 diabetes. Effective glucose-lowering intervention with acarbose was not sufficient to improve insulin secretion or halt the decline of β-cell function.