Il8ARTHURIANA shows the existence ofindoorand outdoor performances, frequententertainments by minstrels at ceremonial and social events, seasonal dramas at Christmas, Shrovetide, and Midsummer, household entertainments, and receptions for royal and noble visitors (all of which are listed in an Appendix whenever the records suggest some sort ofpublic display). The records that follow are divided into four localities, then subdivided by place and date, an arrangement that works especially well for situating Chester among its neighboring towns and parishes. Not surprisingly Chester claims center stage, given the wealth ofinformation that can be culled from sheriffs' rolls, mayors' lists, guild accounts, court records and other arms ofa record-keeping civic bureaucracy. A full apparatus of descriptions of the documents, explanatory and textual notes, translations, glossaries and index accompanies the records. While that apparatus is densewith valuable information, it can nonetheless be difficult for the non-specialist to locate everything needed to make sense of a particular entry, for instance, to be alerted that the mayors' list entry for 1269-70, which claims that 'In this yeare Whitson playes were invented in Chester by one Rondoll Higden...' derives from later revisions and so cannot be taken as thirteenth-century evidence of the date or authorship ofChester civic plays. For the specialist, however, these two fat volumes give the clearest, fullest picture of dramatic activity in Cheshire that scholarship can yield. Cheshire including Chester is the last in the series of REED volumes on the west of England, and thus fills in the final lines on the map of drama in that region. Like the other REED volumes that preceded it, this one makes available a wealth of information about early English drama and its cultural contexts and is an essential research tool for scholars of medieval theatricality and regional cultures. It makes a very welcome addition indeed to the history of performance. CLAIRE SPONSLER University of Iowa Richard barber, Richard brown, and julian MUNBY, EdwardIll's Round Table at Windsor. Woodbridge, UK, and Rochester, NY: The Boydell Press, 2007. Pp. xiv, 282. isbn: 978-1-84383-313-0. $47.95. In August 2006 a limited excavation took place at Windsor Castle on the site thought to be that of the Round Table built by Edward III in 1344. Construction of this building is well documented in the royal Exchequer accounts, and there is a brief description of it in Thomas Walsingham's chronicle. Edward abandoned the project before its completion, however, and no remains of the fabric survive above ground. The excavation, which took place over the three days of a public holiday weekend, was a limited one. Nonetheless, it identified the foundation trench of a large circular hall ofexactly the kind suggested, in their different ways, by both the chroniclers and the Exchequer accounts. The construction of the hall and its place in the world ofArthurian re-enactment form the twin subjects ofthis book. Richard Barber surveys late thirteenth-century Arthurian literature and the models which it REVIEWS119 afforded for a hall ofthis kind, whileJulian Munby offers a reconstruction ofits likely appearance, identifying contemporary parallels (notably Bellver in Majorca), and Munby again and the third co-author, Richard Brown, analyse the buildingaccounts and summarise the excavation finds. The great value ofthis multi-authored volume is that it highlights the close interaction ofimaginative literature and fourteenth-century chivalric practice. In a key contribution Richard Barber shows that, while there was a developing tradition in early fourteenth-century England of the construction of circular or octagonal buildings (think ofthe Ely Octagon), the main source on which Edward drew is likely to have been the hall described in the poem Perceforest. In a laterchapter, Barberoffers stimulatingsuggestions on the possible place ofthe Round Table in Edward's political and military thinking at this time. Placing the Round Table in the context of the role played by orders of chivalry in state formation, he plausibly suggests that the proposed company of knights was expected to support royal authority and to assist in military recruitment. Murimuth tells us that the Round Table was launched after a tournament in January 1344. Yet before the year was out, the project was abandoned and the half-finished building left incomplete. The authors...