Early Central Venous Catheter Research Articles

Early Central Venous Catheter Replacement After Candida in Pediatric Intestinal Failure Patients.

Deferred central venous catheter (CVC) replacement places children with intestinal failure (IF) at risk of complications. We hypothesized that early CVC replacement after uncomplicated candidemia is safe and beneficial. We performed a retrospective review of children with IF. Patients were divided into early (<7 days after their first negative culture), and late (≥7 days after their first negative culture) CVC replacement following uncomplicated candidemia. We calculated the median time to CVC removal, clearance of infection, CVC replacement or exchange, and duration of the initial hospitalization. The proportion of patients readmitted within 30 days was also calculated, taking note of the number of candida reinfections. Early replacement occurred in 18 encounters and late replacement in 21 encounters. The median time in both groups to CVC removal was 3 days (P = 0.949), and clearance of infection was 4 days (P = 0.466). The median time to CVC replacement or exchange in the early group was 4 days, compared to 10 days in the late group (P < 0.001). The median duration of the hospitalization in the early group was 12 days compared to 21 days in the late group (P = 0.011). In total 39% of patients from the early group were readmitted within 30 days compared to 57% from the late group (P = 0.359). None of the patients were reinfected with candida within 30 days. Early CVC replacement after uncomplicated candidemia in children with IF decreases hospital stay without increased risk of readmission or reinfection.

A longitudinal study of Candida bloodstream infections in a Japanese university hospital: species distribution, drug susceptibility, clinical features, and mortality predictors.

We aimed to detect possible changes in Candida species distribution over time and to know the antifungal susceptibility profile of isolates obtained from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) due to this pathogen. Risk factors associated with 30-day mortality were also assessed. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Candida BSI at a Japanese university hospital from 2013 to 2021. The change in the distribution pattern of the Candida spp. isolated was examined by considering three successive sub-periods of 3years each. Risk factors for 30-day mortality were determined using Cox regression analysis. In the entire study period, Candida albicans was the most frequent species (46.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (21.5%) and Candida parapsilosis (18.7%). There was no change in Candida species distribution comparing the three sub-periods analyzed. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin, and most were susceptible to fluconazole, except for C. glabrata. No isolates were resistant to amphotericin B or voriconazole. The overall 30-day mortality was 40.2%. Univariate analysis revealed an association between 30-day mortality and central venous catheter (CVC) removal at any time, high Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Multivariate Cox analysis found that high PBS was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality; subsequent multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that early CVC removal significantly reduced 30-day mortality. Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile in our hospital remained similar from 2013 to 2021. Early CVC removal may improve candidemia outcomes.

Vascular Access and Clinical Outcomes in Underserved Hemodialysis Patients in Mexico

Introduction: Central venous catheter (CVC) as vascular access in hemodialysis (HD) associates with adverse outcomes. Early CVC to fistula or graft conversion improves these outcomes. While socioeconomic disparities between the USA and Mexico exist, little is known about CVC prevalence and conversion rates in uninsured Mexican HD patients. We examined vascular access practice patterns and their effects on survival and hospitalization rates among uninsured Mexican HD patients, in comparison with HD patients who initiated treatment in the USA. Methods: In this retrospective study of incident HD patients at Hospital Civil (HC; Guadalajara, MX) and the Renal Research Institute (RRI; USA), we categorized patients by the vascular access at the first month of HD and after the following 6 months. Factors associated with continued CVC use were identified by a logistic regression model. We developed multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the effects of access and conversion on mortality and hospitalization over an 18-month follow-up period. Results: In 1,632 patients from RRI, the CVC prevalence at month 1 was 64% and 97% among 174 HC patients. The conversion rate was 31.7% in RRI and 10.6% in HC. CVC to non-central venous catheter (NON-CVC) conversion reduced the risk of hospitalization in both HC (aHR 0.38 [95% CI: 0.21–0.68], p = 0.001) and RRI (aHR 0.84 [95% CI: 0.73–0.93], p = 0.001). NON-CVC patients had a lower mortality risk in both populations. Discussion/Conclusion: CVC prevalence and conversion rates of CVC to NON-CVC differed between the US and Mexican patients. An association exists between vascular access type and hospitalization and mortality risk. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate if accelerated and systematic catheter use reduction would improve outcomes in these populations.

Acutely ill hematology/oncology patients with central-line associated bloodstream infections and the impact of timing of catheter removal on outcomes

Hematology/oncology patients are at risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). The purpose was to determine if infection-related mortality, persistent bacteremia, and recurrent bacteremia were decreased with early central venous catheter (CVC) removal. A case-matched, retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing patients with early catheter removal (≤12 hours) to late catheter removal (>12 hours) in hematology/oncology patients with CLABSI from June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2018. Patients were case-matched based on intensive care unit admission and presence of shock to control for severity of illness. Of 148 patients meeting study inclusion, 128 (86.5%), had their CVC removed during hospitalization (median 11.8 hours). The majority had a hematologic malignancy (90.5%). Following case-matching, 48 patients remained in each group. The primary outcome of infection-related mortality, persistent bacteremia, or recurrent bacteremia occurred more frequently in the late catheter removal group compared to the early catheter removal group although this was not statistically significant (18.8% vs 8.3%, P=.136). A lower incidence of infection-related mortality, persistent bacteremia, and recurrent bacteremia was found in patients early catheter removal; however the sample size was not adequate to detect statistical differences. Investigators should continue to evaluate if early catheter removal confers a benefit in a larger patient population.

Risk of pulmonary emboli after removal of an upper extremity central catheter associated with a deep vein thrombosis

AbstractStandard treatment of catheter-associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UE-DVT) is anticoagulation, although catheters are often removed for this indication. The optimal time for catheter removal and whether the act and/or timing of catheter removal is associated with pulmonary embolism (PE) remain unknown. A retrospective cohort study was performed at 8 participating institutions through the Venous thromboEmbolism Network US. Patients with hematologic malignancies and central venous catheter (CVC)–associated UE-DVT were included from 1 January 2010 through 31 December 2016. The primary outcome was objectively confirmed PE within 7 days of UE-DVT diagnosis in anticoagulated patients comparing early (≤48 hours) vs delayed (>48 hours) catheter removal. A total of 626 patients were included, among whom 480 were treated with anticoagulation. Among anticoagulated patients, 255 underwent early CVC removal, while 225 had delayed or no CVC removal; 146 patients received no anticoagulation, among whom 116 underwent CVC removal alone. PE within 7 days occurred in 2 patients (0.78%) with early removal compared with 1 patient (0.44%) with delayed or no CVC removal (P > .9). PE or any cause of death within 7 days occurred in 3 patients in both the early removal (1.18%) and delayed/no removal (1.33%) groups (P > .9). In patients treated with CVC removal only (no anticoagulation), there were no PEs but 3 deaths within 7 days. In patients with hematological malignancy and CVC-associated UE-DVT, early removal of CVCs was not associated with an increased risk of PE compared with delayed or no removal.

Management of enterococcal central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer

ObjectiveEnterococcus species are the third most common organisms causing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The management of enterococcal CLABSI, including the need for and timing of catheter removal, is not well defined. We therefore conducted this study to determine the optimal management of enterococcal CLABSI in cancer patients.MethodsWe reviewed data for 542 patients diagnosed with Enterococcus bacteremia between September 2011 to December 2018. After excluding patients without an indwelling central venous catheter (CVC), polymicrobial bacteremia or with CVC placement less than 48 h from bacteremia onset we classified the remaining 397 patients into 3 groups: Group 1 (G1) consisted of patients with CLABSI with mucosal barrier injury (MBI), Group 2 (G2) included patients with either catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) as defined in 2009 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) or CLABSI without MBI, and Group 3 (G3) consisted of patients who did not meet the CDC criteria for CLABSI. The impact of early (< 3 days after bacteremia onset) and late (3–7 days) CVC removal was compared. The composite primary outcome included absence of microbiologic recurrence, 90-day infection-related mortality, and 90-day infection-related complications.ResultsAmong patients in G2, CVC removal within 3 days of bacteremia onset was associated with a trend towards a better overall outcome than those whose CVCs were removed later between days 3 to 7 (success rate 88% vs 63%). However, those who had CVCs retained beyond 7 days had a similar successful outcome than those who had CVC removal < 3 days (92% vs. 88%). In G1, catheter retention (removal > 7 days) was associated with a better success rates than catheter removal between 3 and 7 days (93% vs. 67%, p = 0.003). In non-CLABSI cases (G3), CVC retention (withdrawal > 7 days) was significantly associated with a higher success rates compared to early CVC removal (< 3 days) (90% vs. 64%, p = 0.006).ConclusionCatheter management in patients with enterococcal bacteremia is challenging. When CVC removal is clinically indicated in patients with enterococcal CLABSI, earlier removal in less than 3 days may be associated with better outcomes.Based on our data, we cannot make firm conclusions about whether earlier removal (< 3 days) could be associated with better outcomes in patients with Enterococcal CLABSI whose CVC withdrawal is clinically indicated. In contrast, it seemed that catheter retention was associated to higher success outcome rates. Therefore, future studies are needed to clearly assess this aspect.

What's New in Shock, July 2021?

What's New in Shock, July 2021?

Clinical impact of early reinsertion of a central venous catheter after catheter removal in patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Early replacement of a new central venous catheter (CVC) may pose a risk of persistent or recurrent infection in patients with a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). We evaluated the clinical impact of early CVC reinsertion after catheter removal in patients with CRBSIs. We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients with confirmed CRBSIs in 2 tertiary-care hospitals over a 7-year period. To treat their infections, 316 patients with CRBSIs underwent CVC removal. Among them, 130 (41.1%) underwent early CVC reinsertion (≤3 days after CVC removal), 39 (12.4%) underwent delayed reinsertion (>3 days), and 147 (46.5%) did not undergo CVC reinsertion. There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups, except for nontunneled CVC, presence of septic shock, and reason for CVC reinsertion. The rate of persistent CRBSI in the early CVC reinsertion group (22.3%) was higher than that in the no CVC reinsertion group (7.5%; P = .002) but was similar to that in the delayed CVC reinsertion group (17.9%; P > .99). The other clinical outcomes did not differ among the 3 groups, including rates of 30-day mortality, complicated infection, and recurrence. After controlling for several confounding factors, early CVC reinsertion was not significantly associated with persistent CRBSI (OR, 1.59; P = .35) or 30-day mortality compared with delayed CVC reinsertion (OR, 0.81; P = .68). Early CVC reinsertion in the setting of CRBSI may be safe. Replacement of a new CVC should not be delayed in patients who still require a CVC for ongoing management.

Management and outcomes of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteremia in patients without cystic fibrosis: a retrospective observational study.

Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is an emerging pathogen of nosocomial infection in chronic or critically ill patients without cystic fibrosis (CF). The objective was to evaluate the management and outcomes of BCC bacteremia in patients without CF. We conducted a retrospective study of non-CF adult patients with BCC bacteremia between January 1997 and December 2016 at 4 tertiary hospitals in South Korea. A total of 216 non-CF patients with BCC bacteremia were identified. Most cases were hospital-acquired (79.2%), and the most common source was a central venous catheter (CVC) (42.1%). The rates of susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and piperacillin-tazobactam of BCC isolates were high as 92.8% and 90.3%, respectively. The rates of susceptibility to ceftazidime, meropenem, and levofloxacin were 75.5%, 72.3%, and 64.1%, respectively. The 14-day, 30-day, and in-hospital mortality rate was 19.4%, 23.1%, and 31.0%, respectively. Female (OR = 3.1; 95% CI, 1.4-6.8), liver cirrhosis (OR = 6.2; 95% CI, 1.6-16.6), septic shock (OR = 11.2; 95% CI, 5.1-24.8), and catheter-related infection (OR = 2.6, 95% CI, 1.2-5.8) were the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. The outcome did not differ according to type of antibiotics used. Among 91 patients with CVC-related BCC bacteremia, delayed CVC removal (> 3days) had a higher rate of persistent bacteremia (54.5 vs. 26.1%; P = 0.03) and lower rate of clinical response (49.0 vs. 71.9%; P = 0.04), compared with early CVC removal (within 3days). BCC bacteremia occurring in non-CF patients was mostly hospital-acquired and CVC-related. Early removal of the catheter is crucial in treatment of CVC-related BCC bacteremia.

120. The Impact of Early Central Venous Catheter Removal in the Management of Enterococcus Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

BackgroundThere has been a rise in Enterococcus species Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) ranking as the third overall causative organism according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report issued in 2014. Central Venous Catheter (CVC) management including the need and timing of CVC removal is not well defined for enterococcus bacteremia (EB) in the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) management guidelines given the paucity of studies addressing CVC management.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review on 543 patients diagnosed with EB between 2010 and 2018. We excluded patients without an indwelling CVC and those with mucosal barrier injury (MBI). We further evaluated 90 patients with EB that met the CDC definition for CLABSI without MBI or the IDSA definition for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and 90 patients with an indwelling CVC in place with documented non-CLABSI with another source.ResultsEarly CVC removal (within 3 days of EB) was significantly higher in the CLABSI without MBI/CRBSI group compared with the non-CLABSI (43% vs. 27%; P = 0.02). Microbiological eradication associated with early CVC removal within 3 days of EB was significantly higher in the CLABSI without MBI/CRBSI group compared with the non-CLABSI (78% vs. 48%; P = 0.016). Complications were lower in the CLABSI without MBI/CRBSI compared with the non-CLABSI group (0% vs. 18%; P = 0.017). Defervescence, mortality (all-cause and infection-related mortality) and relapse were similar in both groups. Within each group, the outcome was similar irrespective of CVC management (removal within 3 days vs. retention).ConclusionIn cases of EB, early CVC removal within 3 days of bacteremia is associated with a favorable outcome in the CLABSI without MBI/CRBSI group compared with the non-CLABSI group.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Clinical impacts of delayed central venous catheter removal according to the severity of comorbidities in patients with candidaemia

The effects of early central venous catheter (CVC) removal on the clinical outcomes of patients with candidaemia remain controversial. This study evaluated the impact of delayed CVC removal on mortality according to the severity of comorbidities in patients with candidaemia. Patients with candidaemia in a tertiary care hospital between January 2010 and December 2017 were included retrospectively. The severity of comorbidities was classified as low [Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≤3] or high (CCI score ≥4). Cases with removal of CVC >2 days after the onset of candidaemia or without CVC removal were classified as having delayed CVC removal. In total, 239 patients with candidaemia were included, excluding 18 who died within 2 days of onset of candidaemia. Of these, 149 had low CCI scores and 90 had high CCI scores. Septic shock [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=9.5] and delayed CVC removal (aOR=4.7) were significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality, whereas Candida parapsilosis infection (aOR=0.2) and cerebrovascular disease (aOR=0.3) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality, in patients with low CCI scores. Septic shock (aOR=13.0) was the only risk factor for 30-day mortality in those with high CCI scores. Delayed CVC removal was associated with increased 30-day mortality in patients with low CCI scores (50.0% vs 20.3%; P=0.001), but not in those with high CCI scores (50.0% vs 47.9%; P=0.87). Early CVC removal may improve the survival of patients with candidaemia and low CCI scores, but no such protective effect was evident in those with high CCI scores.

Impact of Early Dressing Removal on Tunneled Central Venous Catheters: A Piloting Study.

Background:Central Venous Catheters (CVC) are linked with Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CLABSI) or exit-site infections. Dressings may reduce the rate of infection, but they are uncomfortable, do not eliminate the risk of infection, and in some cases become the cause of infection. Aim:This study evaluates the impact of early CVC dressing removal on CLABSI, exit-site infections, and patient quality of life in an oncology setting. Method:A quasi-experimental pilot study was conducted over 15 months at a specialized oncology center. Sixteen patients were divided into control (n=8) and experimental (n=8) groups. The control group received the standard protocol of applying CVC dressings, while the experimental group received a “no-dressing” protocol. Results:There was no statistical significance in the infection rate between the two groups (p=1.0). Two cases developed CLABSIs, one in each group. One patient from the experimental group developed an exit-site infection as well. Patients in the experimental group reported high satisfaction and an improved quality of life.Conclusions:Applying a no-dressing protocol to a well-healed exit site CVC showed encouraging results in terms of exit-site and bloodstream infections. That is to say; it did not predispose patients to increased risk of infections. Furthermore, patients with no dressing protocol feel more comfortable in their life.

The Impact of Early Dressing Removal on the Tunneled Central Venous Catheters

Background: There were many studies compared between different types of dressing such as chlorhexidine gluconate gel (CHG), (CHG) disc, gauze dressing and transparent dressing regarding its intact to the skin, infection rate and patients satisfaction. However, there was few studies regarding the impact of removing the dressing on the occurrence of exit site infection of tunneled central venous catheters. Aim: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of early central venous catheter (CVC) dressing removal of the well-healed exit site infections. Methods: It was a quasi-experiment pilot study conducted over 15 months duration in a specialized oncology center. All adult patients who had newly inserted tunneled central venous catheters (CVC) in place were recruited. Patients were distributed to control and experimental group based on first come first served. Patients in the control group (n=8) received the standard protocol of applying (CVC) dressing, while patients in the interventional group (n=8) received the protocol of no dressing. Results: There was no significant difference in the infection rate between the two groups ( P = 1), so that, a total of two cases had developed catheter-related bloodstream infection (CLABSI), one in the control group and the other in the interventional group. Moreover, one patient in the interventional group had developed exit site infection. However, patients with no dressing protocol (interventional group) perceived an improvement in their quality of life and they were satisfied with this protocol. Conclusion: Applying no dressing protocol to a well-healed exit site CVCs showed encouraging results in terms of exit site and bloodstream infections. That is to say; it did not predispose patients to increased risk of infections. Furthermore, patients with no dressing protocol feel more comfortable in their lifestyle.

Clinical impact of delayed catheter removal for patients with central-venous-catheter-related Gram-negative bacteraemia

Gram-negative bacteria are increasingly the cause of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and the prevalence of multi-drug-resistant strains is rising rapidly. This study evaluated the impact of delayed central venous catheter (CVC) removal on clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative CRBSI. Between January 2007 and December 2016, patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia and CVC placement, from two tertiary care hospitals, were included retrospectively. Cases with CVC removal more than three days after onset of bacteraemia or without CVC removal were classified as having delayed CVC removal. In total, 112 patients were included. Of these, 78 had CRBSI (43 definite and 35 probable) and 34 had Gram-negative bacteraemia from another source (non-CRBSI). Enterobacteriaceae were less common pathogens in patients with CRBSI than in patients with non-CRBSI (11.5% vs 41.3%; P<0.001). Delayed CVC removal was associated with increased 30-day mortality (40.5% vs 11.8%; P=0.01) in patients with Gram-negative CRBSI; this was not seen in patients with non-CRBSI (25.0% vs 14.3%; P>0.99). Delayed CVC removal [odds ratio (OR) 6.8], multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteraemia (OR 6.3) and chronic renal failure (OR 11.1) were associated with 30-day mortality in patients with CRBSI. The protective effect of early CVC removal on mortality was evident in the MDR group (48.3% vs 18.2%; P=0.03), but not in the non-MDR group (11.1% vs 0%; P=0.43). CVCs should be removed early to improve clinical outcomes in patients with Gram-negative CRBSI, especially in settings where MDR isolates are prevalent.

Identification of catheter misplacement in early port CVC dysfunction.

The use of port central venous catheters (CVCs) for chemotherapeutical use has seen exponential growth over the last decades. However, port CVC misplacement may lead to catheter malfunction (such as partial or total catheter blockade), which might be complicated by thrombosis and catheter superinfections, and these in turn may lead to pulmonary embolism and bloodstream infections. The overall occurrence of port CVC misplacement is up to 6%; nonetheless, port CVC misplacement may occur in up to 67% of patients with early CVC dysfunction (occurring within three months of catheter insertion). Thereafter, the prompt evaluation of catheter position among patients with first-trimester CVC dysfunction is extremely important. The aim of the present manuscript is to support medical oncologists, haematologists, and clinicians in timely suspicion and recognition of port CVC misplacement among patients with early CVC dysfunction. Radiological educational iconographic materials that will assist a prompt estimate of port-CVC dislocation are provided.

Impact of inappropriate antifungal therapy according to current susceptibility breakpoints on Candida bloodstream infection mortality, a retrospective analysis

BackgroundThe mortality of Candida Bloodstream Infection (CBSI) remains high. Antifungal susceptibility breakpoints were recently updated for Candida species, the impact remains unknown. In this study we evaluated the impact of inappropriate antifungal treatment according to recent breakpoints on 30-day mortality of CBSI.MethodsFrom June 2008 to July 2014, data on CBSI episodes from two tertiary-care centers, treated > 72 h were analyzed. Antifungal therapy and 30-day mortality were registered. Inappropriate antifungal treatment according to current Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints was adjusted with 30-day mortality-related co-variates.ResultsOne hundred forty-nine episodes of CBSI were analyzed. The most frequent species were: C. albicans (40%), C. tropicalis (23%) and C. glabrata complex (20%). According to the 2012 CLSI, 10.7% received inappropriate treatment. The 30-day mortality was 38%; severe sepsis [Odds ratio (OR) 3.4; 95% CI 1.3–8.4], cirrhosis (OR 36; 95% CI 12.2–605), early central venous catheter removal (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08–0.66) and previous antifungal therapy (OR 0.15; 95%CI 0.03–0.62), were associated with 30-day mortality by multivariate analysis. Inappropriate antifungal treatment was not (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.03–1.2).ConclusionsAppropriate antifungal therapy according to CLSI 2012 did not have an impact on mortality. Mortality of CBSI remains high due to disease severity and comorbidities; early antifungal therapy and catheter removal may reduce it.

Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection Due to Candida spp. in China: Species Distribution, Clinical Features, and Outcomes.

To investigate the distribution of Candida spp., predictors of mortality, and effects of therapeutic measures on outcomes of nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Candida spp. This retrospective, population-based study enrolled adult patients with Candida nosocomial BSI from January 2010 to December 2014 in one tertiary care hospital. The demographics, comorbidities, species distribution, risk factors, and effects of antifungal treatment were assessed. In total, 190 episodes of Candida BSI were identified. The most prevalent species was C. albicans (38.9%), followed by C. parapsilosis (23.2%) and C. tropicalis (20.5%). In vitro susceptibility testing showed that 88.9% of Candida isolates were susceptible to fluconazole. The 30-day hospital mortality was 27.9%, while the early mortality (within 7days) was 16.3%. In a multivariate regression analysis, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score [odds ratio (OR) 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.080-1.390; P=0.002] and severe sepsis or septic shock (OR 15.35; 95% CI 2.391-98.502; P=0.004) were independently correlated with early mortality. Severe sepsis or septic shock (OR 24.75; 95% CI 5.099-120.162; P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality, while proven catheter-related candidemia (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.031-0.810; P=0.027) was a positive factor for 30-day mortality. Early central venous catheter removal and adequate antifungal treatment were closely related to decreased mortality in patients with primary candidemia. The proportion of candidemia caused by C. albicans was lower than that caused by non-albicans species. The severity of illness influenced early mortality, and the origin of the central venous catheter remarkably affected 30-day mortality.

Central Venous Catheter Retention and Mortality in Children With Candidemia: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Candidemia causes significant morbidity and mortality among children. Removal of a central venous catheter (CVC) is often recommended for adults with candidemia to reduce persistent and metastatic infection. Pediatric-specific data on the impact of CVC retention are limited. A retrospective cohort study of inpatients <19 years with candidemia at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between 2000 and 2012 was performed. The final cohort included patients that had a CVC in place at time of blood culture and retained their CVC at least 1 day beyond the blood culture being positive. A structured data collection instrument was used to retrieve patient data. A discrete time failure model, adjusting for age and the complexity of clinical care before onset of candidemia, was used to assess the association of CVC retention and 30-day all-cause mortality. Two hundred eighty-five patients with candidemia and a CVC in place at the time of blood culture were identified. Among these 285 patients, 30 (10%) died within 30 days. Central venous catheter retention was associated with a significant increased risk of death on a given day (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.91). Retention of a CVC was associated with an increased risk of death after adjusting for age and complexity of care at candidemia onset. Although there is likely persistence of unmeasured confounding, given the strong association between catheter retention and death, our data suggest that early CVC removal should be strongly considered.

Candida tropicalis bloodstream infection: Incidence, risk factors and outcome in a population-based surveillance

To assess the current clinical features and determinants of outcome of Candida tropicalis bloodstream infection (BSI). A population-based surveillance on Candida BSI was conducted from May 2010 to April 2011 in 29 Spanish hospitals. Antifungal susceptibility testing (EUCAST methodology) was centrally performed. The characteristics and outcome of C. tropicalis BSI episodes were compared with those due to other species. Fifty-nine out of 752 episodes (7.8%) were due to C. tropicalis (annual incidence: 0.62 cases per 100,000 population). Resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole was found in 23.2% and 26.8% of isolates. Breakthrough BSI occurred in 10.5% of episodes. Risk factors for C. tropicalis BSI were age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.01; P-value = 0.05), underlying leukaemia (OR: 4.77; P-value = 0.001) and chronic lung disease (OR: 2.62; P-value = 0.002). There were no differences in clinical failure (persistent BSI for ≥72 h after initiation of therapy and/or 30-day all-cause mortality) between C. tropicalis (39.6%) and non-C. tropicalis groups (45.6%). The appropriateness of antifungal therapy or the fluconazole MIC values had no significant impact on outcome, whereas early central venous catheter removal exerted a protective effect. C. tropicalis BSI was associated with advanced age, haematological malignancy and respiratory comorbidity. We found no correlation between the unexpectedly high resistance rate to azoles observed and outcome.

Safety and feasibility of a strategy of early central venous catheter insertion in a deployed UK military Ebola virus disease treatment unit.

Early central venous catheter (CVC) insertion in Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a novel approach and has not previously been described. This report delineates the safety, feasibility and clinical implications of early CVC insertion as the optimum means of vascular access in patients with EVD, in the setting of a deployed military Ebola virus disease treatment unit in Sierra Leone. In the gastrointestinal phase of EVD, a 7-French 20-cm triple-lumen CVC was inserted using aseptic technique. Data were collected prospectively on all cases to include baseline and subsequent blood test variables, insertion site and technique, and complications associated with CVC placement. Twenty-three patients underwent CVC insertion as follows: subclavian, 21 (88 %); internal jugular, 2 (8 %); axillary, 1 (4 %). The mean duration of CVC placement was 5 days. There were no significant procedure-related adverse events. Despite coagulopathy being present in 75 % of cases, CVC insertion was safe, and there was only 1 case of significant catheter site bleeding. A total of 152 needle venepunctures were avoided owing to the presence of a CVC, a mean of 7 (±3.8) per case over the average stay. The early use of CVCs in Ebola virus disease is safe, effective and facilitates patient care. It should be considered a feasible additional route of venous access, where physician expertise and resources allow.